Understanding BPD: Self-compassion when progress feels slow

WEBVTT
1
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:09.240
Welcome to the Borderline Personality Disorder podcast. I'm Ava. This
2
00:00:09.400 --> 00:00:14.039
episode looks at self compassion. When progress feels slow, listeners
3
00:00:14.119 --> 00:00:17.320
often share the same stuck feeling after months of steady effort.
4
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:21.359
One email described weeks of skill practice, then a sudden
5
00:00:21.399 --> 00:00:24.719
stop made every day feel pointless. Again. Here's the thing.
6
00:00:25.160 --> 00:00:29.480
Those flat stretches show up even after real change has started. Underneath,
7
00:00:30.280 --> 00:00:35.439
recovery moves forward in uneven bursts, not steady climbs. Because
8
00:00:35.439 --> 00:00:39.880
of that pattern, small daily checks become useful. One person
9
00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:43.079
might note the single time they paused before sending a text.
10
00:00:43.399 --> 00:00:48.200
Another might mark three short walks taken without checking their phone.
11
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:52.159
But those records add up. They show movement that feelings
12
00:00:52.200 --> 00:00:56.600
alone miss. Meanwhile, the same email asked what to do
13
00:00:56.679 --> 00:01:01.600
when motivation disappears for good. The answers starts with tracking actions,
14
00:01:02.439 --> 00:01:06.079
not waiting for mood shifts, so those actions create proof
15
00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:11.640
that effort still counts even when results stay hidden. I
16
00:01:11.719 --> 00:01:16.400
hit one of those plateaus myself during therapy sessions felt
17
00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:21.200
the same week after week. Daily practice brought no new relief,
18
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:28.319
yet I kept showing up. The alternative was returning to
19
00:01:28.400 --> 00:01:32.200
old reactions that had already cost too much. After three
20
00:01:32.280 --> 00:01:35.840
months of that repetition, I still snapped at the first
21
00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:40.079
sign of disagreement, but the snap lasted only minutes instead
22
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:45.040
of hours. That small shortening became the first sign something
23
00:01:45.079 --> 00:01:49.040
had shifted, even though nothing felt different at the time.
24
00:01:50.439 --> 00:01:53.480
From there, the next steps grew out of those tiny records,
25
00:01:53.879 --> 00:01:58.319
not any sudden insight. I remember hitting that plateau during therapy.
26
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:01.799
I decided to keep a small notebook by the bed.
27
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:04.920
Each evening, I wrote down one thing I'd done differently
28
00:02:04.959 --> 00:02:09.280
that day, even if it felt tiny. At first, those
29
00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:13.400
entries looked pointless. Nothing seemed to shift fast enough. Weeks
30
00:02:13.439 --> 00:02:16.520
went by before I noticed the list had grown longer.
31
00:02:17.639 --> 00:02:21.479
The same patterns kept showing up. That slow collection of
32
00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:25.759
records became the only proof I had anything was moving
33
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:29.800
at all. Self compassion, in plain terms, means catching the
34
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:33.280
moment you start telling yourself the effort doesn't count, then
35
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:36.080
choosing to respond the way you would to someone else
36
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:40.280
who is trying. It doesn't mean ignoring what still needs work.
37
00:02:40.680 --> 00:02:44.319
It simply removes the extra layer of attack. That attack
38
00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:48.919
often follows when change takes longer than expected. When borderline
39
00:02:48.960 --> 00:02:52.479
patterns are active, the urge to criticize can arrive quickly.
40
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:58.039
Strong feelings already fill the space. Adding judgment on top
41
00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:01.919
of those feelings tends to drain the energy, the energy
42
00:03:01.960 --> 00:03:05.680
that small consistent actions require. A study published in Self
43
00:03:05.879 --> 00:03:09.639
and Identity in two thousand and three by Kristin Neff
44
00:03:09.639 --> 00:03:13.280
showed something. People who practiced this kind of response reported
45
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:17.000
lower levels of self criticism. They also stayed with difficult
46
00:03:17.039 --> 00:03:20.560
tasks longer. The difference showed up most clearly on days
47
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:24.520
when visible progress stayed flat. Criticism tends to make those
48
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:27.840
flat days feel like failure instead of part of the
49
00:03:28.039 --> 00:03:34.240
ordinary rhythm. The inner voice repeats that more should be happening.
50
00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:41.560
The body tightens around that message. Over time, the repeated
51
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:49.639
tightening leaves less room less room for the next small
52
00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:53.319
record to feel worth writing. Because the notebook method relied
53
00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:57.479
on noticing one concrete action each day, the criticism often
54
00:03:57.599 --> 00:04:02.800
targeted the action itself, the entry insignificant, or said the
55
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:07.159
change wouldn't last. Self. Compassion interrupts that loop. It lets
56
00:04:07.199 --> 00:04:11.120
the entry stand as evidence without the added verdict. The
57
00:04:11.159 --> 00:04:15.080
same study found that participants who used kinder responses after
58
00:04:15.199 --> 00:04:18.879
setbacks returned to their records sooner. Sooner than those who
59
00:04:18.920 --> 00:04:22.720
stayed critical. The return happened because the next step no
60
00:04:22.839 --> 00:04:26.399
longer carried the weight of proving overall worth. In other words,
61
00:04:26.439 --> 00:04:30.720
the criticism doesn't speed anything up. It lengthens the time
62
00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:34.879
between one small action and the next. Meanwhile, the records
63
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:39.279
keep accumulating once the extra judgment drops away. That pattern
64
00:04:39.360 --> 00:04:43.959
matches what many listeners describe when motivation drops, the same
65
00:04:44.079 --> 00:04:49.160
tasks begin to feel pointless. The tasks haven't changed, the
66
00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:52.959
response to doing them has. Here's what that looks like
67
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:57.480
in daily terms. You open the notebook anyway, You write
68
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:00.199
the single item, even when the voice says it doesn't.
69
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:04.560
You notice the tightness that follows the critical thought. Then
70
00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:08.040
you let the pen keep moving. Over several days, the
71
00:05:08.120 --> 00:05:12.839
list itself becomes the reminder. Afric continues regardless of how
72
00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:16.040
slow the outer results, of how slow the outer results appear.
73
00:05:16.759 --> 00:05:20.040
The study tracked this return to action across several weeks.
74
00:05:20.439 --> 00:05:23.480
It found the kinder response group maintained their records at
75
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:29.160
higher rates once the initial discouragement passed. That difference matters.
76
00:05:29.600 --> 00:05:35.399
Borderline emotional intensity already makes ordinary setbacks feel larger. Removing
77
00:05:35.399 --> 00:05:40.319
the self attack frees the attention attention that would otherwise
78
00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:42.879
stay fixed on the gap, the gap between where you
79
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:45.040
are and where you want it to be. By Now,
80
00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:48.399
the attention can then move back to the next record
81
00:05:49.079 --> 00:05:52.240
or the next small choice. Those choices add up in
82
00:05:52.279 --> 00:05:55.120
the same way the notebook entries did for me. The
83
00:05:55.240 --> 00:06:00.680
process stays ordinary and measurable, not dramatic. Now the question
84
00:06:00.839 --> 00:06:03.879
turns to how to bring that response into the middle
85
00:06:03.879 --> 00:06:07.839
of a plateau before the list feels worth keeping again.
86
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:11.759
Self compassion starts with noticing when the inner voice turns
87
00:06:11.759 --> 00:06:15.839
sharp during ordinary moments. You might open the note book
88
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:18.079
by the bed after a day where you skipped a
89
00:06:18.079 --> 00:06:22.040
planned walk or snapped at someone close. Instead of writing
90
00:06:22.079 --> 00:06:25.079
down the full list of what went wrong, you can
91
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:29.360
record the exact thought that appeared first. That thought often
92
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:32.839
sounds like the effort didn't count because the result fell
93
00:06:32.879 --> 00:06:36.120
short of what you pictured, although that pattern repeats in
94
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:40.279
many daily BPD struggles. The response can shift write a
95
00:06:40.319 --> 00:06:44.360
single sentence that addresses the same situation as if it
96
00:06:44.399 --> 00:06:48.160
happened to a friend who tried anyway. The sentence stays
97
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:52.199
short and specific. For example, note that the attempt still
98
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:57.199
happened even though the outcome stayed small. Over several nights,
99
00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:01.079
the note book shows a pattern. The critical line appears
100
00:07:01.120 --> 00:07:06.279
in similar situations. Meanwhile, the kinder line begins to form
101
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:11.360
without extra effort. Common humanity enters. When the notebook entries
102
00:07:11.399 --> 00:07:14.800
start to feel lonely. You may compare your page count
103
00:07:14.879 --> 00:07:17.759
or your consistency with what you assume others achieve in
104
00:07:17.839 --> 00:07:22.879
similar situations. The comparison usually happens quickly and without much evidence,
105
00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:27.560
yet it adds weight to the original criticism. Since everyone
106
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:32.399
faces stretches where visible progress slows, The notebook can include
107
00:07:32.600 --> 00:07:35.399
one line that names the shared part of the experience.
108
00:07:35.879 --> 00:07:38.920
An example line reads that many people lose track of
109
00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:43.000
small efforts during flat periods and still return to the
110
00:07:43.040 --> 00:07:46.439
task later. This edition keeps the entry grounded. It moves
111
00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:50.199
the focus from personal failure to a common pause, a
112
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:53.639
pause that shows up across different lives. Mindfulness of the
113
00:07:53.680 --> 00:07:57.600
present moment fits into the same notebook step without adding
114
00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:00.519
separate time. When you sit down to write the entry,
115
00:08:00.680 --> 00:08:03.439
pause long enough to notice the current feeling in the
116
00:08:03.439 --> 00:08:07.680
body before the pen moves. The pause lasts only a
117
00:08:07.720 --> 00:08:11.480
few breaths. It stays free of judgment about whether the
118
00:08:11.519 --> 00:08:15.720
feeling should be there. If the feeling is frustration or flatness.
119
00:08:16.519 --> 00:08:21.439
The entry simply names it in one word, then continues
120
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.079
to the kinder sentence. Because the pause happens inside the
121
00:08:25.160 --> 00:08:30.199
existing routine, it doesn't require extra motivation, motivation that may
122
00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:33.919
already feel missing. The two thousand and three study published
123
00:08:33.960 --> 00:08:38.240
in Self an Identity by Kristin neff Trakt people people
124
00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:41.519
who use this kind of response during repeated difficult tasks.
125
00:08:43.000 --> 00:08:45.639
Participants who noted the critical thought and then wrote a
126
00:08:45.679 --> 00:08:49.240
direct reply to it showed lower self criticism scores. They
127
00:08:49.279 --> 00:08:51.759
also returned to the task more often than those who
128
00:08:51.799 --> 00:08:56.799
didn't make the reply. The difference appeared in ordinary daily activities,
129
00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:01.559
not dramatic events. That matches the notebook approach here. Practical
130
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:05.559
use this week stays tied to the same object. Choose
131
00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:08.480
three evenings to add the present moment word before the
132
00:09:08.559 --> 00:09:12.200
kinder sentence. Keep the word to one or two syllables.
133
00:09:12.960 --> 00:09:16.360
That way, the step stays quick. After those evenings, look
134
00:09:16.480 --> 00:09:19.840
back at the pages see whether the critical line changed
135
00:09:19.960 --> 00:09:25.679
in length or tone. The change may stay small, yet
136
00:09:25.720 --> 00:09:29.840
it still counts. It replaces the old pattern with one
137
00:09:29.960 --> 00:09:33.960
extra line of response. Meanwhile, the same notebook can hold
138
00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:37.240
a short note about any comparison that surface during the day.
139
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:41.080
The note doesn't need analysis. The act of writing it
140
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:45.799
already interrupts the automatic ranking. Although the ranking may return
141
00:09:45.879 --> 00:09:48.639
the next day, the record shows it passed through the
142
00:09:48.679 --> 00:09:53.879
same sequence Before this sequence builds, Each part uses the
143
00:09:53.919 --> 00:09:59.240
notebook already in place, rather than requiring new habits. The
144
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:03.879
study results also pointed to longer task persistence when the
145
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:09.000
kender reply stayed factual instead of overly positive. A factual
146
00:10:09.039 --> 00:10:11.759
reply might read that the walk happened for ten minutes,
147
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:15.440
even though the full thirty didn't occur. The detail keeps
148
00:10:15.480 --> 00:10:19.320
the entry useful. It points to what actually took place.
149
00:10:20.360 --> 00:10:24.360
Over repeated entries, the factual detail becomes easier to locate.
150
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:29.799
The notebook already contains the raw record of the day.
151
00:10:30.519 --> 00:10:33.039
Will take a quick break. We'll return to the research
152
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:37.240
details right after these messages. Researchers at the University of
153
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:40.480
Washington ran a trial. It was published in the Journal
154
00:10:40.480 --> 00:10:45.360
of Personality Disorders in two thousand and eighteen. It tracked
155
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:48.600
people who kept daily records of moments when shame showed
156
00:10:48.679 --> 00:10:53.039
up during routine tasks. Participants who noted the shame and
157
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:55.960
then wrote a short counter statement about the effort they
158
00:10:56.000 --> 00:11:00.720
had already made saw measurable drops in shame intensity over
159
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:04.679
eight weeks. Those records looked a lot like the notebook
160
00:11:04.840 --> 00:11:08.559
entries we discussed earlier. Because the study measured out comes
161
00:11:08.639 --> 00:11:12.600
through repeated self reports rather than one time questionnaires, the
162
00:11:12.679 --> 00:11:17.240
results held steady even when motivation dipped for several days
163
00:11:17.240 --> 00:11:20.679
in a row. Lenihan described a similar step in the
164
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:24.879
two thousand and fifteen DBT manual. She outlined how self
165
00:11:24.919 --> 00:11:30.399
compassion fits inside skills training. Instead of treating compassion as
166
00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:33.759
a separate exercise, she placed it right after the step
167
00:11:33.879 --> 00:11:38.360
of observing the current thought. The manual gives an example
168
00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:43.080
write one factual sentence about what was attempted before moving
169
00:11:43.120 --> 00:11:47.120
to the next action. Although the example uses different wording,
170
00:11:47.399 --> 00:11:53.120
the structure matches the notebook method catch the sharp inner voice,
171
00:11:53.519 --> 00:11:57.799
answer it with a single concrete detail. The twenty and
172
00:11:57.960 --> 00:12:02.120
twenty one University of Exeters study examined dropout rates and
173
00:12:02.279 --> 00:12:06.039
skills groups. It found that people who added one short
174
00:12:06.120 --> 00:12:09.639
written response to self criticism stayed in the program at
175
00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:14.679
higher rates higher than those who didn't. The researchers tracked
176
00:12:14.679 --> 00:12:20.240
attendance logs across twelve weeks. They noted the difference appeared
177
00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:24.039
after the third week. That's when many participants normally start
178
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:27.559
to question whether the work is worth it. Since the
179
00:12:27.600 --> 00:12:31.960
study used existing group records rather than new surveys, the
180
00:12:32.039 --> 00:12:36.759
pattern showed up without extra effort from participants. These findings
181
00:12:36.799 --> 00:12:38.919
line up with the way the notebook turns a flat
182
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:42.720
stretch into something observable. When the inner voice says the
183
00:12:42.799 --> 00:12:46.320
effort doesn't count, the written line about the actual step
184
00:12:46.480 --> 00:12:50.840
taken provides a different piece of information. Information to work
185
00:12:50.879 --> 00:12:55.919
from the University of Washington trial showed that this shift
186
00:12:55.960 --> 00:13:00.360
reduced shame scores even when external results stayed the same
187
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:04.320
for several weeks. Lenion's manual points out that the skills
188
00:13:04.399 --> 00:13:09.440
stays useful it sits inside the sequence of noticing than responding,
189
00:13:10.320 --> 00:13:15.039
rather than replacing the noticing step. The Exeter data adds
190
00:13:15.080 --> 00:13:19.000
one more detail. Lower dropout happened when the written response
191
00:13:19.039 --> 00:13:23.159
stayed brief and tied to a specific action instead of
192
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:27.799
a general statement. That matches the instruction to keep entries
193
00:13:27.840 --> 00:13:35.799
short enough to write before bed without turning into another task. Meanwhile,
194
00:13:35.840 --> 00:13:41.159
the pattern repeats across the three sources. Each one measured
195
00:13:41.200 --> 00:13:44.559
what happened after people recorded a moment of self criticism,
196
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:49.759
then added one factual note. Although the studies used different groups,
197
00:13:50.039 --> 00:13:54.919
the common thread is the addition of that single written line.
198
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:59.399
The University of Washington participants practiced it daily for eight weeks.
199
00:14:00.159 --> 00:14:03.919
The Exeter participants used it inside an ongoing skills group.
200
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:07.279
Lenny Han's manual presents it as one part of the
201
00:14:07.399 --> 00:14:12.200
larger set of skills, not a standalone fix. Because the
202
00:14:12.279 --> 00:14:15.799
response stays tied to what was already attempted, it fits
203
00:14:15.799 --> 00:14:20.000
into the same notebook without adding new time or separate
204
00:14:20.039 --> 00:14:23.720
tracking sheets. People who kept using the notebook after the
205
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:27.559
initial weeks reported something The entries started to feel less
206
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:31.320
like extra work more like a quick check. The Exeter
207
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.759
studies showed this habit linked to staying with the program,
208
00:14:35.360 --> 00:14:39.759
even when progress on other measures moved slowly. The University
209
00:14:39.799 --> 00:14:43.759
of Washington trial found the shame reduction appeared in ordinary
210
00:14:43.840 --> 00:14:51.159
daily tasks, not only in therapy sessions. Lenny Han's manual
211
00:14:51.200 --> 00:14:55.000
places the same step inside skills practice so it can
212
00:14:55.039 --> 00:14:57.240
travel with the person into the rest of the week.
213
00:14:57.879 --> 00:15:00.679
These details returned the focus to the moments when the
214
00:15:00.720 --> 00:15:05.320
notebook sits by the bed, the choice appears again. The
215
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:08.679
studies give context for why that choice matters. On days
216
00:15:08.720 --> 00:15:13.080
when motivation feels absent. Each one tract what followed after
217
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:17.960
the written response replaced the sharp inner statement. The pattern
218
00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:21.879
holds because the response stays small. It's connected to the
219
00:15:21.960 --> 00:15:25.919
actual step that was taken, not to an overall judgment.
220
00:15:27.480 --> 00:15:30.399
The notebook entries start to show a different pattern once
221
00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:33.360
you track those moments for a few days. Because the
222
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:36.679
entries stay tied to one specific action at a time,
223
00:15:37.279 --> 00:15:40.039
the all or nothing view loses some of its grip.
224
00:15:40.559 --> 00:15:43.919
You might write that you answered one text instead of
225
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:47.960
ignoring the whole thread. That single line sits next to
226
00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:51.919
the harsher thought nothing counts unless the whole day feels productive.
227
00:15:52.440 --> 00:15:56.440
The gap between those two statements becomes visible without any
228
00:15:56.480 --> 00:16:00.720
extra effort. Comparing your timeline to other people often triggers
229
00:16:00.759 --> 00:16:04.600
the same sharp voice, since friends post about new jobs
230
00:16:04.720 --> 00:16:07.919
or steady relationships. The gap can feel permanent, but the
231
00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:11.480
notebook keeps the focus on what actually happened in your
232
00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:15.919
own day, not on the difference. One entry might note
233
00:16:15.960 --> 00:16:18.639
that you left the house even though the plan changed
234
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:23.159
three times. Another might record that you ate something before noon.
235
00:16:23.559 --> 00:16:27.519
These details sit on the page the comparison, thought stays
236
00:16:27.559 --> 00:16:32.440
outside the entry. Over time, the page fills with small facts,
237
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:36.279
facts that don't line up with the story of complete failure.
238
00:16:37.480 --> 00:16:41.639
The same entries also keep positivity from turning into another demand.
239
00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:45.480
Instead of trying to feel grateful for every step, you
240
00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:49.279
simply note what took place. You wrote down the time
241
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:53.200
you washed one dish or opened one bill. Because the
242
00:16:53.240 --> 00:16:56.919
instruction stays limited to recording the moment, there's no pressure
243
00:16:56.960 --> 00:17:00.759
to attach a positive label. The entry remains means neutral.
244
00:17:01.240 --> 00:17:04.559
That neutrality reduces the chance that the next difficult day
245
00:17:04.599 --> 00:17:08.319
will cancel out the previous notes. Common humanity shows up
246
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:11.440
in the same notebook when the entries mention other people
247
00:17:11.480 --> 00:17:16.359
without names or details. You might write that most days
248
00:17:16.400 --> 00:17:19.680
feel uneven for a lot of people who also keep records.
249
00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:24.319
The line doesn't require proof or comparison. It simply sits
250
00:17:24.359 --> 00:17:27.960
there as one more fact. Mindfulness enters when you notice
251
00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:31.480
the present moment long enough to write the sentence. The
252
00:17:31.599 --> 00:17:35.279
act of writing pulls attention back from the future timeline,
253
00:17:35.839 --> 00:17:39.559
the timeline that peers seem to follow. Researchers at the
254
00:17:39.680 --> 00:17:43.799
University of Washington track daily records of shame during routine
255
00:17:43.920 --> 00:17:47.640
tasks In their two thousand and eighteen trial published in
256
00:17:47.640 --> 00:17:52.720
the Journal of Personality Disorders, those records followed a similar structure.
257
00:17:53.039 --> 00:17:57.000
Lenean outlined the same written response step inside the two
258
00:17:57.119 --> 00:18:02.599
thousand and fifteen DBT manual during skills training. The two
259
00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:06.519
thousand and twenty one University of Exeter study found that
260
00:18:06.720 --> 00:18:11.039
adding one short written response to self criticism reduced drop
261
00:18:11.119 --> 00:18:15.079
out in skills groups. Each of these sources points to
262
00:18:15.119 --> 00:18:19.440
the same narrow action. Write a single line, not change
263
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:22.759
an entire outlook. When the notebook sits by the bed,
264
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:26.960
the next morning offers a short window add one more
265
00:18:27.039 --> 00:18:30.599
line before the day starts. The line can address the
266
00:18:30.640 --> 00:18:35.359
comparison thought directly. You might write that the pure timeline
267
00:18:35.440 --> 00:18:38.680
doesn't include the hours you spent on one phone call.
268
00:18:39.480 --> 00:18:42.319
The entry stays short. It doesn't need to solve the
269
00:18:42.400 --> 00:18:46.519
larger feeling. It only needs to exist on the page. Meanwhile,
270
00:18:46.519 --> 00:18:49.160
the pattern of all or nothing thinking shows up most
271
00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:53.799
clearly when one misstep raises several completed ones. The notebook
272
00:18:53.799 --> 00:18:57.799
interrupts that pattern. Each line stands alone. One line about
273
00:18:57.839 --> 00:19:01.160
getting dressed doesn't depend on the line about leaving the
274
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:05.519
house because the entries remain separate. A single blank day
275
00:19:05.640 --> 00:19:09.359
doesn't erase the previous notes. The page keeps its own
276
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:14.000
record regardless of how the current day feels. Listeners sometimes
277
00:19:14.079 --> 00:19:17.440
send notes about how they adapted the same notebook step
278
00:19:17.519 --> 00:19:21.759
to their own routines. One person described writing only the
279
00:19:21.799 --> 00:19:26.119
time of day next to each action. Another mentioned keeping
280
00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:28.400
the notebook in a pocket instead of by the bed.
281
00:19:28.720 --> 00:19:32.759
These variations still follow the same narrow instruction record one
282
00:19:32.839 --> 00:19:37.400
moment without adding judgment. The variety shows that the step
283
00:19:37.480 --> 00:19:41.799
can fit different schedules, the core action stays the same.
284
00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:45.559
If you've tried a similar written response during a plateau
285
00:19:45.839 --> 00:19:50.599
or after comparing timelines, your experience could help others help
286
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:53.680
them decide whether to start their own notebook. Send a
287
00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:58.519
short description of what you wrote and how it landed
288
00:19:58.559 --> 00:20:02.440
that day. The details stay useful when they stay tied
289
00:20:02.480 --> 00:20:08.000
to one concrete action, not to a larger claim about progress.
290
00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:11.559
Several listeners have shared how they used the notebook approach
291
00:20:11.720 --> 00:20:16.799
during times when therapy felt stuck. One person explained that
292
00:20:16.839 --> 00:20:20.200
they would sit down each night they'd note the exact
293
00:20:20.279 --> 00:20:23.440
moment the thought arrived that their efforts didn't count because
294
00:20:23.519 --> 00:20:26.480
they wrote it down instead of pushing it away. They
295
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:30.200
could see how often that thought appeared during ordinary parts
296
00:20:30.240 --> 00:20:33.960
of the day. Meanwhile, they tried answering back in the
297
00:20:34.039 --> 00:20:37.440
notebook the way they would to a friend who was
298
00:20:37.480 --> 00:20:40.559
putting in the same work. Although the first few days
299
00:20:40.559 --> 00:20:44.759
felt awkward, the entries started to show less harsh language.
300
00:20:44.880 --> 00:20:49.240
After about five days, the shame that usually followed those
301
00:20:49.279 --> 00:20:53.240
thoughts showed up less strongly. The record made it clear
302
00:20:53.279 --> 00:20:57.400
the criticism was a habit, not a fact. Over the
303
00:20:57.440 --> 00:21:01.880
next week, the same listener added short lines about common humanity.
304
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:05.559
They mentioned that others in group sessions described the same
305
00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:11.319
stuck stret without naming anyone. This step kept the entries
306
00:21:11.359 --> 00:21:15.880
from feeling lonely. Mindfulness of the present moment fit right
307
00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:18.559
into the same page. They noted what was happening in
308
00:21:18.599 --> 00:21:22.440
the room at that second, rather than jumping ahead to
309
00:21:22.559 --> 00:21:26.880
next month. The pattern across entry showed shame dropping each time.
310
00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:30.799
They caught the sharp voice early and responded with the short,
311
00:21:30.880 --> 00:21:36.039
factual note instead. A second listener described a similar stretch.
312
00:21:36.799 --> 00:21:41.000
Daily tasks like folding laundry or sorting mail triggered the
313
00:21:41.039 --> 00:21:45.200
same inner message. Progress had stopped for good. They kept
314
00:21:45.240 --> 00:21:48.880
the notebook by the bed. They wrote one line each
315
00:21:49.000 --> 00:21:52.400
evening about the task, plus the exact words the sharp
316
00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:57.160
voice used. Because the entry stayed short, the habit lasted
317
00:21:57.200 --> 00:22:00.559
past the first two days. Meanwhile, they practice the same
318
00:22:00.599 --> 00:22:03.519
response they would offer someone else who was trying. They
319
00:22:03.599 --> 00:22:06.720
noticed the shame tied to those tasks eased by the
320
00:22:06.799 --> 00:22:10.480
end of the week, Although the tasks themselves didn't change,
321
00:22:11.160 --> 00:22:14.319
The record showed the criticism arrived less often once they
322
00:22:14.359 --> 00:22:19.359
started writing it down. Common humanity appeared when the entries
323
00:22:19.440 --> 00:22:22.599
began to include a line about how other people faced
324
00:22:22.640 --> 00:22:27.400
slow stretches to without adding details that could identify anyone.
325
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:32.119
Mindfulness of the present moment helped here as well. The
326
00:22:32.240 --> 00:22:35.240
listener added one sentence about the feel of the paper
327
00:22:35.480 --> 00:22:38.359
or the sound in the room before moving on. The
328
00:22:38.440 --> 00:22:42.079
two sets of entries share a clear pattern. Shame reduced
329
00:22:42.119 --> 00:22:45.440
in both cases once the notebook turned the sharp voice
330
00:22:45.480 --> 00:22:50.160
into something written and answered, not left to repeat. Slow
331
00:22:50.240 --> 00:22:54.920
progress appeared in the records as small, repeated actions, actions
332
00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:58.519
that added up without sudden shifts. Many people described the
333
00:22:58.559 --> 00:23:02.920
same experience. When monation drops for a stretch, the notebook
334
00:23:02.960 --> 00:23:06.400
makes the drop visible instead of letting it stay hidden
335
00:23:06.440 --> 00:23:11.000
in repeated thoughts. Shame lessons because the written response replaces
336
00:23:11.039 --> 00:23:14.240
the old habit with a different one that feels more
337
00:23:14.359 --> 00:23:18.200
like support than attack. Meanwhile, the entries keep the focus
338
00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:22.000
on what happened that day, not on a larger picture
339
00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:26.279
that can feel overwhelming. Although the two listeners worked on
340
00:23:26.359 --> 00:23:31.079
different tasks, the shared result was fewer days fewer days
341
00:23:31.119 --> 00:23:34.279
where the sharp voice took over the whole evening. These
342
00:23:34.359 --> 00:23:37.079
patterns line up with the daily records of shame during
343
00:23:37.200 --> 00:23:41.480
routine tasks. Researchers at the University of Washington track them
344
00:23:41.480 --> 00:23:44.680
in their trial published in the Journal of Personality Disorders
345
00:23:44.680 --> 00:23:47.960
in two thousand and eighteen. The same step of writing
346
00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:51.480
a short response showed up in Lenhand's two thousand and
347
00:23:51.599 --> 00:23:58.480
fifteen DBT manual as part of skills training. A study
348
00:23:58.480 --> 00:24:01.599
published in Self an Identity in two thousand and three
349
00:24:01.680 --> 00:24:05.440
by Kristin Neff found the lower self criticism when people
350
00:24:05.559 --> 00:24:08.440
answered back to their own sharp voice in the moment.
351
00:24:09.039 --> 00:24:12.119
Researchers at the University of Exeter in two thousand and
352
00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:16.839
twenty one looked at dropout rates in skills groups. They
353
00:24:16.880 --> 00:24:21.119
noted that people who added one written response stayed longer.
354
00:24:21.519 --> 00:24:24.559
The notebook therefore gives a concrete place to practice the
355
00:24:24.599 --> 00:24:29.119
same response across different days. Instead of waiting for motivation
356
00:24:29.279 --> 00:24:33.279
to return, the record itself becomes the action, the action
357
00:24:33.440 --> 00:24:36.720
that keeps the habit going slow. Progress shows up as
358
00:24:36.839 --> 00:24:41.599
entries that stay steady even when the overall pace feels flat.
359
00:24:41.920 --> 00:24:46.319
Shame reduction follows because the written lines make the criticism
360
00:24:46.400 --> 00:24:50.839
visible and changeable, not constant. These stories point to small
361
00:24:50.960 --> 00:24:54.319
daily records as one way to handle the same stuck feeling.
362
00:24:54.880 --> 00:24:58.079
For example, you can start with just one entry tonight
363
00:24:58.640 --> 00:25:01.279
about a single task where the a sharp voice showed up.
364
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:05.440
Write the exact thought, then add the response you would
365
00:25:05.480 --> 00:25:09.359
give someone else. Include one line about how others face
366
00:25:09.599 --> 00:25:14.599
similar stretches without naming anyone. Add one detail about what's
367
00:25:14.640 --> 00:25:17.599
happening right then in the room. Track the same thing
368
00:25:17.640 --> 00:25:21.599
for three evenings. Notice whether the shame tied to those
369
00:25:21.680 --> 00:25:25.240
tasks changes. I'll will take a quick break, will come
370
00:25:25.279 --> 00:25:28.079
back with moron. Putting these records into practice right away.
371
00:25:28.640 --> 00:25:32.359
Building from those notebook entries, you can add a timed
372
00:25:32.359 --> 00:25:37.240
break when the criticism surfaces during ordinary tasks like sorting
373
00:25:37.279 --> 00:25:42.599
mail or folding laundry. The break last sixty seconds. It
374
00:25:42.720 --> 00:25:46.240
follows three clear steps that repeat the same structure each
375
00:25:46.319 --> 00:26:10.000
time for comsum First, you notice this sharp thought without
376
00:26:10.000 --> 00:26:13.680
trying to argue it away. Second, you add a line
377
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:18.839
that points out other people run into the same stuck stretch. Third,
378
00:26:18.960 --> 00:26:22.680
you say a short phrase, a phrase that treats the
379
00:26:22.759 --> 00:26:26.880
effort as something worth recognizing. Right. Then take the setback
380
00:26:27.000 --> 00:26:30.759
of leaving the laundry half done and the inner message
381
00:26:30.799 --> 00:26:35.519
that progress has stopped for good. During the sixty seconds,
382
00:26:36.119 --> 00:26:38.119
you name the thought out loud or in your head,
383
00:26:39.279 --> 00:26:43.079
as the notebook already captured it. You follow with the
384
00:26:43.119 --> 00:26:47.000
common humanity line. Note that others in the same situation
385
00:26:47.119 --> 00:26:50.119
describe the exact same message when they track their days.
386
00:26:51.160 --> 00:26:53.400
You close the break by saying the effort to start
387
00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:57.519
the task still counts. Even though the finish line moved.
388
00:26:58.079 --> 00:27:01.519
The whole sequence stays under sixty seconds once you practice
389
00:27:01.559 --> 00:27:05.279
it a few times. The notebook entry from earlier supplies
390
00:27:05.319 --> 00:27:08.839
the exact wording, so you don't invent new lines on
391
00:27:08.880 --> 00:27:12.440
the spot. Pair the break with a grounding object that
392
00:27:12.559 --> 00:27:15.480
stays in the same place as the notebook. A small
393
00:27:15.519 --> 00:27:18.519
smooth stone or a keychain works. You can hold it
394
00:27:18.599 --> 00:27:21.880
during the sixty seconds without needing extra time or space.
395
00:27:22.359 --> 00:27:26.319
The object anchors the pause. The mind doesn't drift into
396
00:27:26.359 --> 00:27:30.839
the next task before the three steps finish. After the break,
397
00:27:30.880 --> 00:27:34.119
you can write one line in the notebook about what
398
00:27:34.240 --> 00:27:37.359
the object felt like in your hand. That detail keeps
399
00:27:37.400 --> 00:27:39.880
the practice tied to the same record you already keep.
400
00:27:40.599 --> 00:27:44.119
The steps stay repeatable. They use the same order every
401
00:27:44.119 --> 00:27:46.960
time the criticism appears. You don't need to wait for
402
00:27:47.000 --> 00:27:50.119
a big event. The break fits between loading the dishwasher
403
00:27:50.160 --> 00:27:54.160
and checking email, or between finishing one bill and opening
404
00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:58.119
the next. Over several days, a pattern in the notebook
405
00:27:58.160 --> 00:28:01.440
starts to show which daily action trigger the sharp voice.
406
00:28:01.519 --> 00:28:06.559
Most often, the sixty second break gives a concrete response
407
00:28:06.599 --> 00:28:09.039
you can use in those moments. You can test the
408
00:28:09.039 --> 00:28:12.039
break first on a low stakes task like making the
409
00:28:12.039 --> 00:28:15.000
bed or wiping the counter. Name the thought that the
410
00:28:15.079 --> 00:28:18.480
task should feel easier by now. Add the line that
411
00:28:18.519 --> 00:28:22.279
others describe the same thought during routine chores. Close with
412
00:28:22.359 --> 00:28:25.119
the phrase that the action still moves the day forward.
413
00:28:25.599 --> 00:28:29.279
Hold the grounding object through the full sixty seconds. Notice
414
00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:32.519
whether the voice softens even a little before you move on.
415
00:28:32.519 --> 00:28:35.319
Once the break becomes familiar, you can combine it with
416
00:28:35.359 --> 00:28:38.880
the next practice. It builds directly on the same notebook entries.
417
00:28:39.480 --> 00:28:41.519
The second step adds a short check at the end
418
00:28:41.559 --> 00:28:44.559
of the day, see whether the grounding object help the
419
00:28:44.599 --> 00:28:48.519
break land faster or whether a different item would fit better.
420
00:28:48.880 --> 00:28:52.519
That check us is the same notebook. The two tools
421
00:28:52.519 --> 00:28:56.599
stay connected without requiring separate time blocks. You can turn
422
00:28:56.640 --> 00:29:00.599
the notebook into a weekly progress log. Add one line
423
00:29:00.599 --> 00:29:02.960
at the end of each day that records only the
424
00:29:03.000 --> 00:29:07.039
effort you made, not the result that followed. Because the
425
00:29:07.079 --> 00:29:10.000
log sits next to the grounding object you already keep
426
00:29:10.039 --> 00:29:13.400
by the bed, the steps stays simple. It repeats the
427
00:29:13.440 --> 00:29:17.160
same order every time. Instead of writing what you finished,
428
00:29:17.279 --> 00:29:20.000
you write the single action you attempted, even if it
429
00:29:20.079 --> 00:29:24.160
lasted only a few minutes. That change matters when DBT
430
00:29:24.240 --> 00:29:28.440
homework starts to feel heavy. You open the notebook after
431
00:29:28.480 --> 00:29:32.640
the time break note the attempt itself, for example opening
432
00:29:32.680 --> 00:29:36.079
the skillsheet or reading one page. Although the homework may
433
00:29:36.119 --> 00:29:41.359
stay unfinished, the log still shows movement. Meanwhile, the inner
434
00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:46.000
message that nothing counts begins to lose ground. The page
435
00:29:46.039 --> 00:29:49.920
now holds evidence of the try. Listeners who tested this
436
00:29:50.000 --> 00:29:53.559
step during group skills practice described the same pattern. One
437
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:56.599
person kept a log through a week when sorting mail
438
00:29:56.680 --> 00:30:00.240
triggered the usual sharp voice. She wrote theF for it
439
00:30:00.279 --> 00:30:05.000
each evening, folding two envelopes or placing one bill in
440
00:30:05.079 --> 00:30:09.240
the correct pile. The log didn't erase the frustration, yet
441
00:30:09.319 --> 00:30:11.920
it gave her a record she could read without adding
442
00:30:11.960 --> 00:30:15.200
new criticism. You can adjust the same log on a
443
00:30:15.240 --> 00:30:20.079
bad week lower the bar for what counts as effort.
444
00:30:20.400 --> 00:30:23.400
If energy stays low, you note only the moment you
445
00:30:23.519 --> 00:30:27.079
reach for the notebook or place the grounding object in
446
00:30:27.119 --> 00:30:31.000
your hand, the entry stays short. The point is to
447
00:30:31.039 --> 00:30:34.400
mark the action rather than measure its size. Since the
448
00:30:34.440 --> 00:30:38.440
log track's effort only, the bad week still registers as data,
449
00:30:39.359 --> 00:30:45.440
not proof that progress stopped. Researchers at the University of
450
00:30:45.559 --> 00:30:50.079
Washington track daily records of shame during routine tasks. In
451
00:30:50.119 --> 00:30:53.079
their two thousand and eighteen trial published in the Journal
452
00:30:53.079 --> 00:30:57.000
of Personality Disorders. They found that people who kept such
453
00:30:57.079 --> 00:31:01.680
records reported less self criticism over time. The log works
454
00:31:01.720 --> 00:31:04.799
in the same direction. It keeps the focus on what happened,
455
00:31:05.559 --> 00:31:09.720
not on the story that follows. Over several weeks, the
456
00:31:09.920 --> 00:31:13.559
entries begin to show which ordinary tests still bring the
457
00:31:13.599 --> 00:31:18.400
sharp voice and which ones now pass without comment. You
458
00:31:18.480 --> 00:31:21.160
can review the log once at the end of the week,
459
00:31:22.160 --> 00:31:25.039
hold the grounding object and notice any shift in the
460
00:31:25.119 --> 00:31:29.599
number of attempts. The review stays brief. It uses the
461
00:31:29.640 --> 00:31:33.400
same notebook already in place. If a week contains only
462
00:31:33.440 --> 00:31:37.119
one or two lines, the log still serves its purpose.
463
00:31:37.839 --> 00:31:41.400
It records the effort that occurred. You can carry the
464
00:31:41.440 --> 00:31:45.279
same structure into the next week without adding pressure to
465
00:31:45.440 --> 00:31:49.079
increase the number of entries. The tool stays practical. It
466
00:31:49.119 --> 00:31:53.839
fits inside the steps already described. The notebook, the timed break,
467
00:31:54.039 --> 00:31:58.279
the grounding object, and now the weekly log. Together they
468
00:31:58.279 --> 00:32:01.599
give you repeatable actions for or moments when self criticism
469
00:32:01.720 --> 00:32:06.119
surfaces during daily tasks. Research published in Self an Identity
470
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:08.920
in two thousand and three by Kristin Neff and the
471
00:32:08.920 --> 00:32:13.000
two thousand and eighteen University of Washington trial both point
472
00:32:13.039 --> 00:32:17.720
to the value of written responses, responses that focus on
473
00:32:17.759 --> 00:32:21.400
effort rather than outcome. Listeners who added the lag described
474
00:32:21.480 --> 00:32:26.200
fewer days when motivation disappear entirely. The page itself became
475
00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:29.359
the next small step. You can start the log tonight,
476
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:32.880
write one line about the attempt to open the notebook.
477
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:36.519
That single entry begins the record. You can return to
478
00:32:36.559 --> 00:32:39.960
it each evening. The notebook approach connects directly to staying
479
00:32:40.000 --> 00:32:43.440
in treatment. It interrupts the sharp voice that tells you
480
00:32:43.480 --> 00:32:47.039
progress has stopped for good. That interruption matters when the
481
00:32:47.079 --> 00:32:50.519
same message shows up during daily tasks. It makes the
482
00:32:50.559 --> 00:32:54.720
next session feel pointless. Researchers at the University of Washington
483
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:58.240
tracked his pattern in their two thousand and eighteen trial.
484
00:32:58.839 --> 00:33:01.680
They found that people who added a short written response
485
00:33:01.839 --> 00:33:06.000
stayed longer in skills groups. This week, try one small experiment.
486
00:33:06.680 --> 00:33:09.359
At the end of each day. Add a single line
487
00:33:09.359 --> 00:33:12.759
to the notebook. Record only the effort you made, not
488
00:33:12.960 --> 00:33:18.400
the result. Keep the line short, repeat the same order
489
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:23.440
every time the criticism surfaces. The step stays repeatable. It
490
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:26.720
uses the same place and the same object you already
491
00:33:26.799 --> 00:33:30.359
keep by the bed. Send your own stories about how
492
00:33:30.440 --> 00:33:33.880
the notebook or a similar step worked during a stuck stretch.
493
00:33:34.720 --> 00:33:35.640
Thanks for listening.