WEBVTT
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:00.800
Welcome everyone.
00:00:00.959 --> 00:00:05.839
This week's chorus, or this week's chorus, is actually about synodality.
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:07.360
What's going on with the synod?
00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.119
What's not going on with the synod?
00:00:09.199 --> 00:00:11.039
What, in fact, does synodality mean?
00:00:11.199 --> 00:00:20.079
And uh Charlie, one of our panelists, is going to need this conversation because part of it is based on a book I've just written and published called Uh Synod Diary.
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:22.079
Okay, Charlie, all yours now.
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:23.600
Thank you very much, Michael.
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:24.399
Good morning, everyone.
00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:27.519
Welcome to yet another exciting special edition of Core Eclasia.
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:29.199
As always, I'm joined by Dr.
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:34.719
Daniel Rober, who is an associate professor of Catholic Studies and former chair of the department.
00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:35.920
And I'm joined by Dr.
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:36.479
Michael W.
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:42.880
Higgins, distinguished author and the distinguished professor of Catholic thought emeritus here at Sacred Heart University.
00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:47.119
In addition to far more titles than we could list here, I'm Charlie Gillespie.
00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:51.359
I'm an associate professor in Catholic Studies and the associate dean of our School of Performing Arts.
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:54.880
What is synodality and why did I start with so many titles?
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:59.039
The most interesting thing about this word is that we're saying it all the time.
00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:05.519
And unless you have picked up Michael Higgins' new book, A Synod Diary, you might not have a sense of why this word is so important.
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.519
And that's where I want to start, Michael.
00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:10.560
Why do we need to know this word synod?
00:01:10.879 --> 00:01:15.120
And why do we need to think about synodality if it was just 60 days that shook the church?
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:18.879
Is it in the past or are we still feeling some aftershocks from this in your pain?
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:24.799
I would like to think we're going to have a lot of aftershocks, but I'm not absolutely convinced that we're getting them.
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:36.079
I think, I think the book's title, of course, is extravagant, and it's based in part upon John Wheat's famous book about the 10 days that shook the world in in 1917.
00:01:36.319 --> 00:01:42.480
I remember Jim Martin saying to me in Rome, he said, Michael, it's uh 60 days, it's going to be 60 years at best.
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:46.000
I said, yes, but it starts with the first 60 days.
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:49.920
You start with the tremors and then you get the earthquake.
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.799
And I said, we're still dealing with the tremors of the Second Vatican Council.
00:01:54.879 --> 00:01:58.799
And the synod, in many ways, is an expression of that.
00:01:59.120 --> 00:02:24.000
Um the difficulty uh I had in writing a book with the specific remit that I had for this, which was to give it a um a friendly face and accessibility, allowing um the non-specialists who don't spend their life in a bubble of synodality, um, to actually try and grasp what this word and experience means.
00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:31.680
And of course, it's uh uh multi-variegated, it's it's not multivalent and multi-everything else that for that matter.
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:36.639
It's not a word that is easy to univocally define.
00:02:36.960 --> 00:03:04.159
And talking to an archbishop recently who said to me, you know, some of us just um tremble at the S-word, and the S word is synodality, and they do, as some others are experiencing synod uh fatigue, they do in part, I think, because we talk about it, we talk about the way we can experience synodality, and we forget that in many ways we live synodally anyway.
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:15.599
Um the pastoral council that came out of the Second Vatican Council, that every parish was to erect, you had at least canonically to have a finance committee, but you were supposed to have a parish council.
00:03:15.759 --> 00:03:24.159
Many of the things that either atrophied or were never fully activated get a kickstart with this synodately project.
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:30.960
This is, I think, the most important project of the um Burgodio uh papacy.
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:48.719
It's not as most refined in and polished, like some of it is encyclicals, like Flatelli Tuti and whatnot, but they create the theological and philosophical framework that allows this pastoral strategy, synodality, to begin to take shape.
00:03:48.879 --> 00:04:03.759
So synodality is um is a word, it's a concept, it's an experience, um, it's a challenge because I think many people are trying to figure out how do we institute this, how do we find ways of making it work.
00:04:04.080 --> 00:04:16.480
And uh we're faced with what often happens when a new concept begins to implant itself in our consciousness and in our structures, we discover inertia.
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:40.079
Uh, I yeah, I think that many national episcopal conferences, they're not hostile to the project, they're not indifferent to it, they're just overwhelmed by what they see as the complexities of synodality, and so they just do what, you know, bureaucrats do in every structure, and that is they just quietly resist its implementation.
00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:44.480
So we're at that phase where people are saying, oh, synodality.
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:50.000
Oh, yeah, we well, you know, we did one thing in the parish and we did this and we did that.
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:52.399
But the reports have to be submitted.
00:04:52.560 --> 00:05:05.519
There is a three-year uh implementation phase, and much to the discouragement, I think, of people who thought, okay, this was another trendy Bergoglio notion, Leo will put it in perspective.
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:18.079
Leo's actually uh endorsed synodality, and no doubt will give it his own coloration, but he's not departed from this, is committed to the three-year implementation phase and whatnot.
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:19.759
So we are stuck with this.
00:05:19.920 --> 00:05:25.519
So let's let's let's grab it because you know in the end, it's not a scary thing.
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:28.160
It's a welcome moment in the history of the church.
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:35.279
That's so exciting you put it that way, Michael, because one of my favorite things about your book is you identify it as an amoose bouche.
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:48.720
It gets the reader so excited to meet the people, the experiences, the restaurants in Italy and the various pronzos and calazones of the day that you're having with all these journalists and prelates from around the church.
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:53.360
And my question, Michael, is how was your appetite wet by this experience?
00:05:53.519 --> 00:06:07.680
Because what is so exciting about your book, I think, for people, is we hear this highfalutin idea of synodality that our panel is going to come back to today as a theological concept, as a mess, to use Pope Francis's phrase.
00:06:08.240 --> 00:06:08.720
Right.
00:06:08.959 --> 00:06:15.279
But you give us a sense that synodality is about people walking together, and your book lets us meet those people.
00:06:15.439 --> 00:06:17.199
Why did you decide to write it that way?
00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:21.040
And how might that help us think about synodality as a theme and an idea?
00:06:21.439 --> 00:06:29.759
But I think, Charlie, um I realized in Polish Press at the time when we were thinking about this, that there will be many tomes on synodality.
00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:37.279
There'll be doctoral theses written on it, there'll be studies by church historians, by systematic theologians, historical theologians, whatnot.
00:06:37.439 --> 00:06:41.439
And that's all fine, and that's all to the good, and we welcome that.
00:06:41.839 --> 00:06:49.040
But you know, the experience of the synod is primarily a visceral, on-site, personal, relational experience.
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:52.399
And the journalists were not allowed into the aula.
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:58.160
We couldn't go into the hall, we couldn't hear what they were saying, we were not part of the dynamic.
00:06:58.319 --> 00:07:09.920
And I found that at the beginning very frustrating because with Francis's emphasis on transparency and Parisia and everything else, it seemed counterproductive to set constraints around it.
00:07:10.079 --> 00:07:12.319
But then I came to really appreciate what he was doing.
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:16.319
And what he was doing was to create a spiritual moment for them.
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:25.920
The delegates were going to gather around the roundtables, not the kind of the tiered levels, which was typical of the exclusively Episcopal synods in the past.
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:32.959
And so the round table allowed for a level of uh uh equanimity and a level of equity.
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.800
People were looking at each other, they weren't looking down at each other.
00:07:36.959 --> 00:07:41.120
And as a consequence, this created a more familial moment.
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:50.319
And um, for the delegates themselves, this was not only liberating, it actually uh was energizing for them.
00:07:50.480 --> 00:07:56.000
You could see them going in at the late hours of the day, and ordinarily they would be tired, but they weren't.
00:07:56.079 --> 00:08:06.240
They were looking forward to the next phase because they were getting to learn and to know people that they would not have been able to get to know in the ordinary one of the church.
00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:18.399
So you'd have a you'd have a cardinal sitting beside uh a female theologian of a at a prominent university sitting beside somebody who was involved in some kind of institutional life in a diocese or whatever.
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:19.600
And they were all together.
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:21.519
They would never have been together in any other way.
00:08:21.680 --> 00:08:38.879
And so I looked to the press conferences uh, because that was the primary, that was the only avenue outside the less orthodox conventional ones where you're having a coffee in a tetheria or something like that, trying to uh um uh uh get some information out of a reluctant clergyman.
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:50.080
But the the majority of cases it would be in the press conference, and they were unlike any press conference I had ever attended in the Stampa della Santa City or the press office of the Holy See.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:53.360
Usually they're very controlled, they're very structured.
00:08:53.519 --> 00:08:59.519
Uh the your interlocutor uh is is overly cautious, they're boring.
00:08:59.919 --> 00:09:01.919
This did not happen this time.
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:04.480
They came in, they were excited.
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:07.679
Every prel, and I mean, every prelate who spoke.
00:09:07.840 --> 00:09:09.919
Now we were there for a long time.
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:39.360
Um, one month, one whole month, press conferences pretty well every day, five days of the week, usually sometimes on Saturday and Sunday, if there was a particular development, so a lot of press conferences, which meant that when you had six or seven people at the front table uh and the dais responding to the queries from the media, you over a period of time you would rotate so many figures from the Senate delegates, you put him up got everyone, certainly the majority.
00:09:39.679 --> 00:09:51.440
And as a consequence, I was especially interested in how they they've uh factored in their appreciation of the current Sonoto experience with what they had in the past.
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:57.039
Now, this would apply only to the cardinals, archbishops, and bishops who had been present at previous synods.
00:09:57.279 --> 00:10:02.960
Everyone, without exception, said this was a genuine Sonoto experience.
00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:17.919
They contrasted it with their previous experience, one American, one African cardinal saying, you know, you landed on the tarmac for the first day of the synod in the past, and you knew everything was done, everything was written, the Pope knew exactly what he was going to say.
00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:20.080
It really didn't matter.
00:10:20.399 --> 00:10:24.720
This time around, it did matter, and you could feel it.
00:10:24.879 --> 00:10:30.000
They um some of them were cautious, some of them were skeptical, some of them were cynical.
00:10:30.080 --> 00:10:35.679
Uh many of them just wanted to see how this worked, but they were uh anxious.
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:48.799
They came around, with the exception, I think, of possibly two among the entire uh delegate uh uh uh congregation, they um they they bought in to the to the Francis model.
00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:58.799
Now, the problem with this, and this this Tom Reese and I were the were talking about it briefly at the end of the uh concluding mass for the first session.
00:10:59.039 --> 00:11:03.679
And you will remember uh Reese, he had been an editor of America Magazine.
00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:11.919
Um he had been censured at one point, um, he's resurfaced, he's one of the most knowledgeable commentators on the Catholic scene in Rome.
00:11:12.159 --> 00:11:26.399
And he um I said, Well, now we've just spent so much time uh watching, observing, tasting the enthusiasm, the fervor, and indeed the intelligence of the synodelegates.
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:31.519
Um, and they're having a great time, and there's 365 of them, including the Pope.
00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:34.240
What about the other 1.4 billion Catholics?
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:38.240
How are we going to be able to translate this to the Church Universal?
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:43.360
And he said, Michael, in my uh professional life, I'm a political scientist.
00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:47.200
And if one thing I know is it's this leadership.
00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:49.279
It will depend on the leadership.
00:11:49.440 --> 00:11:52.159
And I think that's true, and that's where we are now, Charlie.
00:11:52.799 --> 00:11:54.720
That's such a great way to think about it.
00:11:54.799 --> 00:12:24.879
And I want to commend one aspect of your book to our listeners and viewers, which is because you've structured it as this diary where you can sort of compare dates between the first and second session and you reflect on your experience of being at the Extraordinary Synod in 1985 as a way to think about the differences, it really opens up the recognition that this event in the history of the church isn't just a blip for its documents, but it might actually be a consequential change to how we think about being church.
00:12:25.039 --> 00:12:54.000
And that's where I want to bring Dan in, actually, which is to say, Dan, have you seen any ways in which Catholic life has felt some of the aftershocks of the synod in the way that Michael's been describing, both the structure of making room to not know what's going to come next, actually having conversations, but also embracing Catholic life where it's not a person at the dais speaking out, except for at these press conferences where we're rotating people, but the small circles are actually tables in a room.
00:12:54.159 --> 00:12:57.840
How have you seen this play out in Catholic life around the world in your work, Dan?
00:12:59.039 --> 00:12:59.360
Sure.
00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:08.240
Well, I think I think it's important to understand, um, just to add something before I get to directly to your question, right?
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:19.440
That you know, so much of this is a reception of um Vatican II, um, and really kind of right at the intersection of the letter and spirit of Vatican II, right?
00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:35.120
In the sense of the council fathers coming out of the council asked for a synod, um, and Paul VI sprung one on them um that was slightly different from what they had in mind, slightly more consultative and less legislative uh than they had in mind.
00:13:35.519 --> 00:13:52.159
Um, and so Francis bringing forward synodality and the synods in the way he did um was very much a way of revisiting that decision, um, right, somewhat by indirection, but also expanding the scope of it, right?
00:13:52.320 --> 00:14:03.679
Saying, yes, it's not just the synod of bishops, right, but um it's the the synod bringing synodality out to the rest of the church, right?
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:05.600
And that does move the goalposts, right?
00:14:05.759 --> 00:14:21.360
Because many of the critics of the last synod were focused on, well, it's really supposed to be the synod of bishops, uh, which is still giving the synod of bishops more credence than I think some of them might have given it uh before Francis started bringing synodality forward.
00:14:21.679 --> 00:14:31.200
So I think really, and again, the the beauty of synodality, right, is it plays out differently in different parts of the world.
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:32.000
Yes, right.
00:14:32.159 --> 00:14:46.000
So in the parts of the world where the church is thriving and growing, they're very much doing a lot of synodality because they don't have the experience of the top-down clerical church of the same kind as we have, because they don't have priests.
00:14:46.159 --> 00:14:46.799
Uh, right.
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:52.320
Because then, you know, this connects it to the synod on the Amazon, which Michael does discuss in his book, also, right?
00:14:52.480 --> 00:15:01.440
That uh, and which does get cited in uh sneak preview, the document we'll be discussing more next week on uh women in the life of the church, right?
00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:07.279
Um, but those people have been living a more synodal church because they have to do it themselves.
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:13.039
Um, we in the West are really kind of growing into this, whether we like it or not, right?
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:23.759
In the sense that in the face of secularization, right, in the face of fewer clergy, um, and certainly fewer clergy in the way that we are kind of accustomed to, right?
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:28.159
Um being part of the church means being part of a synodal church.
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:38.320
It means being part of a church where you are engaged in discussion and life um of the church with your neighbors because that's who the church is for you.
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:41.519
It's not the institution, it's not the hierarchy.
00:15:42.000 --> 00:15:44.080
I mean, Michael, you want to respond to Dan?
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:46.879
Yes, I think Dan's absolutely right, actually.
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:58.639
Um, you know, Francis made it clear again and again in his writings, but particularly also in the context of the synod, that he wanted to talk about the church as an inverted pyramid.
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:07.360
And so uh he pope and the hierarchy are not the top of the of the uh of the pyramid there uh any longer, they're at the bottom.
00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:13.919
And so the bishop of Rome, the supreme pontiff of the universal Roman jurisdiction or whatever, is actually the servant of the servants of God.
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:16.399
And this this was a big thing for him.
00:16:16.559 --> 00:16:25.919
One of the reasons why I think uh Francis achieved um during the course of his pontificate was the wonderful humanizing of the face of the papacy.
00:16:26.159 --> 00:16:37.120
And uh this was another illustration of his intention of making it, and uh well, I put this in brackets, more democratic in its uh in its living reality.
00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:48.720
So the the synod itself is uh an effort, an outcropping of many of the things that were released um uh by the capsule that needed articulation.
00:16:48.879 --> 00:17:04.799
And certainly the global church is more sinned in its very constitution than the European and American churches, which tend to rely on a more 19th-century continental model of deeply embedded hierarchy and control.
00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:06.960
And Francis wanted to move away from that.
00:17:07.039 --> 00:17:08.799
Of course, Francis was an Argentine, right?
00:17:08.880 --> 00:17:16.079
So, I mean, he his experience was a Latin American experience, very much like our current father, who also has 20 years of Latin American experience.
00:17:16.240 --> 00:17:18.400
It's a very different kind of a church.
00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:25.759
But I think uh for me, well, uh, because my approach was just to look at the characters, it's like a drama, right?
00:17:25.839 --> 00:17:37.680
And you understand this, because if you hook your own work in uh in theater and the interrelationship of the aesthetic with the religious sensibility, that a lot of what goes on in Rome is theater.
00:17:37.759 --> 00:17:41.519
And a lot, and and our liturgy is theater in an important way.
00:17:41.920 --> 00:17:48.079
So the the theater uh or the drama of the synod is to be found in a strummatus persona.
00:17:48.160 --> 00:17:49.359
So you look to the characters.
00:17:49.519 --> 00:17:50.160
What are they like?
00:17:50.240 --> 00:17:51.440
What were they expecting?
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:57.599
Well, how what did they what did they take from this great moment of dialogue and tension?
00:17:57.839 --> 00:18:02.880
And one of the things you you discovered, and again, when you're covering the synod, you're not actually in it.
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:06.079
You're not in the aula, you're outside the aula.
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:22.640
That is a disadvantage, but it's also an advantage because when you go to the press conferences, distinguished by the remarkable degree of transparency, by the way, uh, when you go to the press conferences and you talk to them private, you were reliving something of what happened in the original council.
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:32.000
I mean, when there were various people, like the greatest of all conciliar journalists, of course, was the American Xavier Ryn, which Mia was a pseudonym for Francis X.
00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:42.079
Murphy, writing for the New Yorker, it was greatly driven by talking to the people, talking to the people outside the aula, outside the Great Hall.
00:18:42.319 --> 00:18:44.319
And that's what I think many of us try to do.
00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:46.400
We try to try to replicate that.
00:18:46.559 --> 00:19:08.160
Uh, because there have been various apologia, uh, various um arguments, treatises, uh, compilations, anthologies, all about synodality, consultation around synod documents, early synod documents, and whatnot, wanted to try something a little different from that major corpus or canon and look at the characters.
00:19:08.319 --> 00:19:09.200
Who are the characters?
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:10.319
What are they doing?
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:12.880
What's some of the excitement that's in Rome?
00:19:13.039 --> 00:19:14.000
The tension.
00:19:14.160 --> 00:19:26.799
I mean, the the one that uh scene that I particularly enjoyed um was uh a remarkably clever young woman, um, a journalist, uh, an American, but educated in Switzerland and Germany.
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:29.279
And she um would always get up.
00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:42.640
She'd be the first speaker or the second speaker of the press conference, and she would hammer um the her interlocutor with a tough question, and she she would keep coming back to it until she got an answer, was always respectful.
00:19:42.799 --> 00:19:45.680
She employed all the honorifics and everything else.
00:19:45.839 --> 00:19:51.119
She wasn't uh casual or or dismissive, she just didn't believe them.
00:19:51.359 --> 00:19:54.400
And she kept pushing, she kept pushing, right?
00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:57.440
So she made a lot of enemies and she didn't care.
00:19:57.680 --> 00:20:07.920
Well, one day during uh a recess, we were standing on the uh Borgle, and uh she was eating some gelato, and she was by herself.
00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:09.680
And I felt sorry for her.
00:20:09.759 --> 00:20:14.240
And so I said to a couple of my colleagues who were with me, I said, I'm going to go over and talk to her.
00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:26.799
And so they came with me and I went over and I said, I want to congratulate you on the uh thoroughness of your research and the tenacity of uh your opinion and its delivery.
00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:29.200
She said, Oh, oh, she said, Do you agree with me?
00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:30.880
I said, No, I never agree with you.
00:20:31.119 --> 00:20:33.759
I said, I just appreciate the way you're doing it.
00:20:33.920 --> 00:20:40.319
So she looked at me and she said, You know, if it wasn't for your native Irish charm, I would hit you in the nose right now.
00:20:40.480 --> 00:20:47.920
So I turned to my colleagues and I said, For God's sake, don't tell her I'm not Irish, but English.
00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:52.240
But anyway, you know, you know, it's a survival tactic.
00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:59.599
But I, though, those kind of colorful moments, I think, uh speak to sometimes the intensity of encounters.
00:20:59.680 --> 00:21:07.680
Uh, and if that was true among the journalists, how much more true must it have been among many of the synodelicates themselves?
00:21:07.839 --> 00:21:31.440
And yet when they came out and when they were together in communion and they were at liturgy, and sometimes uh liturgical ceremonies outside uh Eucharist proper, um uh uh, you know, um a marvelous ceremony around reparation and sex abuse and everything else, there was a tremendous sense of the integrity and wholeness of the community.
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:37.200
And you can't um you you can't misrepresent that or caricature it.
00:21:37.359 --> 00:21:38.240
You have to feel it.
00:21:38.319 --> 00:21:43.119
And I I think there was an advantage, Charlie, in the fact that this was not my first in it.
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:49.680
Because I'm not caught up in Romanita, the the great excitement you have when you're in Rome the first time.
00:21:49.839 --> 00:21:51.119
Um, yeah, you go through that.
00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:52.720
It's like going to New York for the first time.
00:21:52.799 --> 00:21:56.319
You go through that, and then eventually you move beyond that, right?
00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.880
So um I'm way beyond that.
00:21:59.119 --> 00:22:12.319
So I I have no interest in writing something that's going to be a yahoy kind of jubilant text of celebration.
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:24.880
But at the same time, it was not my intention to write a negative vehicle propagandizing a cynical view that I may hold over church governance.
00:22:25.039 --> 00:22:28.319
I wanted to taste the experience of the synod.
00:22:28.400 --> 00:22:39.759
And I did this most effectively for myself at least by contrasting it with previous synod experiences to show what a significant rupture from the past this new Synod is.
00:22:40.400 --> 00:22:43.279
And you certainly achieve that with this book, Michael.
00:22:43.440 --> 00:22:53.599
It's uh one of the best things about it for me is because you invite us to thinking about this synod conversationally, between what has come before the rupture of this moment?
00:22:54.079 --> 00:22:56.720
It invites me to think about how it looks to the future.
00:22:56.880 --> 00:23:03.839
And we should spend a little bit of our remaining time thinking about one of those characters from the synod that was Robert Privost, who's now Pope Leo.
00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:06.000
And so I want to throw a question to both of you.
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:07.119
We'll start with Dan.
00:23:07.279 --> 00:23:10.720
Does synodality help us think about peace in any way?
00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:20.079
Are we seeing anything from Pope Leo's response to some of the global conflicts, particularly the war in Iran, right now in his calls for peace?
00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:27.599
Are there any ways that we see that connected to synodality or this sense of people talking to one another that Michael's opened up for us?
00:23:27.759 --> 00:23:37.519
Dan, what are some of your thoughts on some of the recent comments from uh Pope Leo around war in the world or even the situation of the world vis-a-vis the Vatican right now?
00:23:38.559 --> 00:23:55.599
Well, I think I think you can see ironically uh the commitment to synodality in um a pretty vicious uh Babylon B headline uh that came out the other day um criticizing Pope Leo, right?
00:23:55.759 --> 00:24:06.720
Now, um I'll read it verbatim, uh, but you know, and you have to be sort of uh you have to understand the the Babylon B's kind of way of doing things, right?
00:24:06.799 --> 00:24:12.079
So their supposedly Christian satire website that's gone kind of full MAGA, right?
00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:18.079
Um so their article is headlined, Pope condemns Allied forces for not just talking it out with Nazis.
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:19.279
Um, right.
00:24:19.359 --> 00:24:29.279
And this, of course, is warmongering um about the US um and Iran, of course, ironically, uh hitting somewhat close to Pius XII's approach to the actual Nazis.
00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:34.559
But um what it what it's doing is actually criticizing synodality.
00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:50.000
It's saying, right, how could you encourage the US to talk to the Iranian government, um, which has said all these nasty rhetorical things about the US over the years and all that, instead of just going ahead with war, right?
00:24:50.480 --> 00:24:58.880
Um, so clearly on that level, right, the way that Leo is approaching this is catching on in terms of negative traction.
00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:03.519
There's also an article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday by uh William McGuern, right?
00:25:03.759 --> 00:25:10.799
Basically accusing uh Pope Leo of not applying just war theory, when in fact he is applying just war theory.
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:20.079
Um so I think Leo, right, has been thrown very much into um having to pick up on the world being on fire, right?
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:26.799
Which is something that Francis certainly acknowledged, it's something that Leo has been um consistent on, right?
00:25:27.119 --> 00:25:41.039
Um, but I think the way he's doing it, right, is through precisely the kind of dialogical approach uh that Synodality recommends to us, um, and that I think he's learned as a religious, right?
00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:43.359
As somebody who's had to live with other people, right?
00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:47.599
It's somebody who's also been a missionary of in a culture that was foreign to him, right?
00:25:47.759 --> 00:25:53.759
Someone who had to be on the ground with people and dialogue with them and learn about them, um, right.
00:25:53.920 --> 00:26:02.799
And then as somebody who's also been involved in appointing bishops for um uh North America, Europe, and Latin America, right?
00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:11.759
Where again you're looking at quite different cultural contexts and trying to find the right way uh for the church to move forward in those places.
00:26:11.920 --> 00:26:29.920
So I think on that level, he's kind of living out um versions of synodality, um, even as again, in terms of planning for the kind of broader synodal project that's specifically discussed here, um, I think he's playing a somewhat longer game than Francis was.
00:26:30.079 --> 00:26:36.720
Francis, to use an American football analogy, was kind of running the two-minute offense uh for much of his pontificate, right?
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:43.440
Uh, where you're kind of like trying a lot of things, uh, you know, high risk, high reward things.
00:26:43.599 --> 00:27:04.640
Um, whereas I think Leo is trying to do a bit longer-term game planning uh in terms of how to make these things part of the life of the church rather than being viewed as some kind of charismatic gimmick, um, which um I think a lot of people who have been negative about the synod um have uh tried to portray it as.
00:27:05.119 --> 00:27:06.960
Michael, same question to you.
00:27:07.279 --> 00:27:19.680
Uh, I think there was a marvelous example of how synodality can have implications for geopolitical realities, um, ad extra or outside the church, if you like.
00:27:19.920 --> 00:27:56.160
In a conversation um in one of the press conferences when Cardinal Schoenberg, Christoph Schoenberg, the Dominican Archbishop Emeritus of Vienna, uh commented, and a great supporter of Francis, and a very keen supporter of synodality from the get-go, commented on a um uh kind of a learned, not kind of, but a learned official who said to him, you know, if we did these, if we acted the way you are, with this synodal model of engagement at the UN with which he was attached, uh, we would not have global war.
00:27:56.240 --> 00:27:58.400
We wouldn't be in the situation we're in right now.
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:26.799
And of course, it's easy to say that, and we do realize it's a rather rarefied moment to have all these 364 delegates or whatever gathered in Rome over a period of two years, is a special privileged grace moment, but it is uniquely elitist, if you like, in the in that it is not representative of the uh larger experience of the church, though the individual delegates would be largely representative of their constituencies.
00:28:26.960 --> 00:28:30.640
The number itself is minuscule by comparison, of course.
00:28:30.880 --> 00:28:35.759
And um, but how how we translate that experience is going to be the great challenge.
00:28:35.920 --> 00:28:36.799
I think Dan is right.
00:28:36.880 --> 00:28:39.839
I think Leo is committed to the long term, right?
00:28:40.240 --> 00:28:57.839
Um, and the an example of that, I think, and we discussed this uh Charlie fairly recently with regard to uh Leo's creating this extraordinary consistorio meeting in Rome, which he's now established as a template of synodal behavior.
00:28:58.000 --> 00:28:59.119
So, you know, he's there.
00:28:59.200 --> 00:29:00.400
He said, Well, what can I do?
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:04.799
I mean, how do I implement this model of serious conversation and listening?
00:29:04.960 --> 00:29:08.319
Well, I can't do it for the whole church, but I can do it with my advisors.
00:29:08.480 --> 00:29:14.480
I can do it with the people who I invited at the beginning of my pontificate to help me in the governance, right?
00:29:14.720 --> 00:29:21.680
So this is a way of uh institutionalizing or enacting that Synodal principle at his level.
00:29:21.839 --> 00:29:33.599
Now, if every bishop did this with their presbyteral councils, if every pastor did this in their uh in their community, then we would have synodality on a row because we know.
00:29:33.759 --> 00:29:50.559
We know that it's not going to be necessary to recreate the full structure uh with 10 people around the table with a facilitator and a redactor and using the three-point system, going around uh punctuating with silent, reverent listening prayer.
00:29:50.720 --> 00:29:52.079
It's not going to happen.
00:29:52.240 --> 00:29:57.599
It can happen and should happen at least once, but it's not going to happen irregularly.
00:29:57.759 --> 00:30:02.240
We have to find other modalities and ways of carrying synodality forward.
00:30:02.480 --> 00:30:10.960
But that fundamental experience, if you like, will be uh will be transformative in a way, and people will know what to expect.
00:30:11.119 --> 00:30:13.200
And that's what I think is really important.
00:30:13.440 --> 00:30:31.599
So it's a matter, to uh agree with Tom Reese on this, it's a matter now of implementing it uh at the appropriate level of leadership uh to actually implement another great uh doctrinal uh social doctrinal principle, subsidiarity in structural ecclesial terms.
00:30:31.759 --> 00:30:33.839
How do we allow this to work?
00:30:34.160 --> 00:30:37.839
Um, it's gonna take time, it'll be driven by personalities.
00:30:38.079 --> 00:30:40.319
Personalities make up the church.
00:30:40.480 --> 00:30:54.319
One of the reasons why the diary attempted to identify who some of these characters are, because there are they're, I mean, a church in Chicago or in Peoria or downtown Toronto or whatnot, they're gonna have all their own characters, right?
00:30:54.559 --> 00:30:57.440
And how do we lead with them?
00:30:57.759 --> 00:31:09.839
Oh, in this by saying that I truly believe this to be the case, that this is another wonderful instance where the church will rely on the wisdom, the charisms, and the genius of the laity.
00:31:10.160 --> 00:31:32.720
And it was not a surprise to me that it was during this period of sononal reflection and development that we both canonized and then declared a doctor of the church, the thinker most responsible for the recovery of the lay charism and the importance of consensus uh fidee in the church, John Henry Newman.
00:31:32.799 --> 00:31:44.000
So Newman, I hope, somewhere a theologian of consequence will, or a doctoral student of consequence, will take on the Newman component of synodality.
00:31:44.160 --> 00:32:03.200
What how did how did Newman provide uh some background and reflection uh on synodality, especially given his own patristic work and especially given his ressourcement tendency, but also his magnificent um 1859 on consulting the laity and matters of doctrine?
00:32:03.359 --> 00:32:12.480
I think that's such an important work, and it should be uh a working Bible for Synod uh delegates and those working on synodality in the church now.
00:32:12.880 --> 00:32:25.680
Michael, thank you so much for not only being our regular host for our podcast, but for also offering us such a rich resource to understand how the synod is going to affect the life of the church moving forward.
00:32:25.920 --> 00:32:42.480
But on that point about John Henry Newman, as we bring ourselves to a close, it's a reminder that here at Coraclesia, what we're trying to do is bring that sense of synodality and ressorts mol, that wonderful Catholic term for recovering the sources for their life today in conversation with others.
00:32:42.640 --> 00:32:51.279
And we're looking forward to the fact that one of the ways in which lay co-responsibility can cooperate with the Synodal Project is to keep having difficult conversations.
00:32:51.440 --> 00:33:18.319
Cora Klazen will be back very soon with some special guests to engage in some discussion about an output of the synod, reminding us that the whole point of synodality is to allow us to develop those relationships, those senses of the people that Michael gives us so wonderfully in his Synod Diary, so that we can then engage in some of the most difficult conversations that look to the signs of the times, so that our living tradition can continue to give life in the presence.
00:33:18.480 --> 00:33:22.640
I'm so honored that I got to host this conversation with you both this morning.
00:33:22.799 --> 00:33:27.519
And we look forward to this next edition of Core Clasia coming your way sooner than usual.
00:33:27.680 --> 00:33:28.480
Thanks so much, everyone.
00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:29.119
See you next week.
00:33:29.279 --> 00:33:29.920
Thank you, Jeremy.
00:33:30.079 --> 00:33:30.880
Thank you, Daniel.
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:00.800
Welcome everyone.
00:00:00.959 --> 00:00:05.839
This week's chorus, or this week's chorus, is actually about synodality.
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:07.360
What's going on with the synod?
00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.119
What's not going on with the synod?
00:00:09.199 --> 00:00:11.039
What, in fact, does synodality mean?
00:00:11.199 --> 00:00:20.079
And uh Charlie, one of our panelists, is going to need this conversation because part of it is based on a book I've just written and published called Uh Synod Diary.
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:22.079
Okay, Charlie, all yours now.
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:23.600
Thank you very much, Michael.
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:24.399
Good morning, everyone.
00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:27.519
Welcome to yet another exciting special edition of Core Eclasia.
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:29.199
As always, I'm joined by Dr.
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:34.719
Daniel Rober, who is an associate professor of Catholic Studies and former chair of the department.
00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:35.920
And I'm joined by Dr.
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:36.479
Michael W.
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:42.880
Higgins, distinguished author and the distinguished professor of Catholic thought emeritus here at Sacred Heart University.
00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:47.119
In addition to far more titles than we could list here, I'm Charlie Gillespie.
00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:51.359
I'm an associate professor in Catholic Studies and the associate dean of our School of Performing Arts.
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:54.880
What is synodality and why did I start with so many titles?
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:59.039
The most interesting thing about this word is that we're saying it all the time.
00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:05.519
And unless you have picked up Michael Higgins' new book, A Synod Diary, you might not have a sense of why this word is so important.
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.519
And that's where I want to start, Michael.
00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:10.560
Why do we need to know this word synod?
00:01:10.879 --> 00:01:15.120
And why do we need to think about synodality if it was just 60 days that shook the church?
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:18.879
Is it in the past or are we still feeling some aftershocks from this in your pain?
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:24.799
I would like to think we're going to have a lot of aftershocks, but I'm not absolutely convinced that we're getting them.
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:36.079
I think, I think the book's title, of course, is extravagant, and it's based in part upon John Wheat's famous book about the 10 days that shook the world in in 1917.
00:01:36.319 --> 00:01:42.480
I remember Jim Martin saying to me in Rome, he said, Michael, it's uh 60 days, it's going to be 60 years at best.
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:46.000
I said, yes, but it starts with the first 60 days.
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:49.920
You start with the tremors and then you get the earthquake.
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.799
And I said, we're still dealing with the tremors of the Second Vatican Council.
00:01:54.879 --> 00:01:58.799
And the synod, in many ways, is an expression of that.
00:01:59.120 --> 00:02:24.000
Um the difficulty uh I had in writing a book with the specific remit that I had for this, which was to give it a um a friendly face and accessibility, allowing um the non-specialists who don't spend their life in a bubble of synodality, um, to actually try and grasp what this word and experience means.
00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:31.680
And of course, it's uh uh multi-variegated, it's it's not multivalent and multi-everything else that for that matter.
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:36.639
It's not a word that is easy to univocally define.
00:02:36.960 --> 00:03:04.159
And talking to an archbishop recently who said to me, you know, some of us just um tremble at the S-word, and the S word is synodality, and they do, as some others are experiencing synod uh fatigue, they do in part, I think, because we talk about it, we talk about the way we can experience synodality, and we forget that in many ways we live synodally anyway.
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:15.599
Um the pastoral council that came out of the Second Vatican Council, that every parish was to erect, you had at least canonically to have a finance committee, but you were supposed to have a parish council.
00:03:15.759 --> 00:03:24.159
Many of the things that either atrophied or were never fully activated get a kickstart with this synodately project.
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:30.960
This is, I think, the most important project of the um Burgodio uh papacy.
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:48.719
It's not as most refined in and polished, like some of it is encyclicals, like Flatelli Tuti and whatnot, but they create the theological and philosophical framework that allows this pastoral strategy, synodality, to begin to take shape.
00:03:48.879 --> 00:04:03.759
So synodality is um is a word, it's a concept, it's an experience, um, it's a challenge because I think many people are trying to figure out how do we institute this, how do we find ways of making it work.
00:04:04.080 --> 00:04:16.480
And uh we're faced with what often happens when a new concept begins to implant itself in our consciousness and in our structures, we discover inertia.
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:40.079
Uh, I yeah, I think that many national episcopal conferences, they're not hostile to the project, they're not indifferent to it, they're just overwhelmed by what they see as the complexities of synodality, and so they just do what, you know, bureaucrats do in every structure, and that is they just quietly resist its implementation.
00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:44.480
So we're at that phase where people are saying, oh, synodality.
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:50.000
Oh, yeah, we well, you know, we did one thing in the parish and we did this and we did that.
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:52.399
But the reports have to be submitted.
00:04:52.560 --> 00:05:05.519
There is a three-year uh implementation phase, and much to the discouragement, I think, of people who thought, okay, this was another trendy Bergoglio notion, Leo will put it in perspective.
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:18.079
Leo's actually uh endorsed synodality, and no doubt will give it his own coloration, but he's not departed from this, is committed to the three-year implementation phase and whatnot.
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:19.759
So we are stuck with this.
00:05:19.920 --> 00:05:25.519
So let's let's let's grab it because you know in the end, it's not a scary thing.
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:28.160
It's a welcome moment in the history of the church.
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:35.279
That's so exciting you put it that way, Michael, because one of my favorite things about your book is you identify it as an amoose bouche.
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:48.720
It gets the reader so excited to meet the people, the experiences, the restaurants in Italy and the various pronzos and calazones of the day that you're having with all these journalists and prelates from around the church.
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:53.360
And my question, Michael, is how was your appetite wet by this experience?
00:05:53.519 --> 00:06:07.680
Because what is so exciting about your book, I think, for people, is we hear this highfalutin idea of synodality that our panel is going to come back to today as a theological concept, as a mess, to use Pope Francis's phrase.
00:06:08.240 --> 00:06:08.720
Right.
00:06:08.959 --> 00:06:15.279
But you give us a sense that synodality is about people walking together, and your book lets us meet those people.
00:06:15.439 --> 00:06:17.199
Why did you decide to write it that way?
00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:21.040
And how might that help us think about synodality as a theme and an idea?
00:06:21.439 --> 00:06:29.759
But I think, Charlie, um I realized in Polish Press at the time when we were thinking about this, that there will be many tomes on synodality.
00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:37.279
There'll be doctoral theses written on it, there'll be studies by church historians, by systematic theologians, historical theologians, whatnot.
00:06:37.439 --> 00:06:41.439
And that's all fine, and that's all to the good, and we welcome that.
00:06:41.839 --> 00:06:49.040
But you know, the experience of the synod is primarily a visceral, on-site, personal, relational experience.
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:52.399
And the journalists were not allowed into the aula.
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:58.160
We couldn't go into the hall, we couldn't hear what they were saying, we were not part of the dynamic.
00:06:58.319 --> 00:07:09.920
And I found that at the beginning very frustrating because with Francis's emphasis on transparency and Parisia and everything else, it seemed counterproductive to set constraints around it.
00:07:10.079 --> 00:07:12.319
But then I came to really appreciate what he was doing.
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:16.319
And what he was doing was to create a spiritual moment for them.
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:25.920
The delegates were going to gather around the roundtables, not the kind of the tiered levels, which was typical of the exclusively Episcopal synods in the past.
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:32.959
And so the round table allowed for a level of uh uh equanimity and a level of equity.
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.800
People were looking at each other, they weren't looking down at each other.
00:07:36.959 --> 00:07:41.120
And as a consequence, this created a more familial moment.
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:50.319
And um, for the delegates themselves, this was not only liberating, it actually uh was energizing for them.
00:07:50.480 --> 00:07:56.000
You could see them going in at the late hours of the day, and ordinarily they would be tired, but they weren't.
00:07:56.079 --> 00:08:06.240
They were looking forward to the next phase because they were getting to learn and to know people that they would not have been able to get to know in the ordinary one of the church.
00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:18.399
So you'd have a you'd have a cardinal sitting beside uh a female theologian of a at a prominent university sitting beside somebody who was involved in some kind of institutional life in a diocese or whatever.
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:19.600
And they were all together.
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:21.519
They would never have been together in any other way.
00:08:21.680 --> 00:08:38.879
And so I looked to the press conferences uh, because that was the primary, that was the only avenue outside the less orthodox conventional ones where you're having a coffee in a tetheria or something like that, trying to uh um uh uh get some information out of a reluctant clergyman.
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:50.080
But the the majority of cases it would be in the press conference, and they were unlike any press conference I had ever attended in the Stampa della Santa City or the press office of the Holy See.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:53.360
Usually they're very controlled, they're very structured.
00:08:53.519 --> 00:08:59.519
Uh the your interlocutor uh is is overly cautious, they're boring.
00:08:59.919 --> 00:09:01.919
This did not happen this time.
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:04.480
They came in, they were excited.
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:07.679
Every prel, and I mean, every prelate who spoke.
00:09:07.840 --> 00:09:09.919
Now we were there for a long time.
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:39.360
Um, one month, one whole month, press conferences pretty well every day, five days of the week, usually sometimes on Saturday and Sunday, if there was a particular development, so a lot of press conferences, which meant that when you had six or seven people at the front table uh and the dais responding to the queries from the media, you over a period of time you would rotate so many figures from the Senate delegates, you put him up got everyone, certainly the majority.
00:09:39.679 --> 00:09:51.440
And as a consequence, I was especially interested in how they they've uh factored in their appreciation of the current Sonoto experience with what they had in the past.
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:57.039
Now, this would apply only to the cardinals, archbishops, and bishops who had been present at previous synods.
00:09:57.279 --> 00:10:02.960
Everyone, without exception, said this was a genuine Sonoto experience.
00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:17.919
They contrasted it with their previous experience, one American, one African cardinal saying, you know, you landed on the tarmac for the first day of the synod in the past, and you knew everything was done, everything was written, the Pope knew exactly what he was going to say.
00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:20.080
It really didn't matter.
00:10:20.399 --> 00:10:24.720
This time around, it did matter, and you could feel it.
00:10:24.879 --> 00:10:30.000
They um some of them were cautious, some of them were skeptical, some of them were cynical.
00:10:30.080 --> 00:10:35.679
Uh many of them just wanted to see how this worked, but they were uh anxious.
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:48.799
They came around, with the exception, I think, of possibly two among the entire uh delegate uh uh uh congregation, they um they they bought in to the to the Francis model.
00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:58.799
Now, the problem with this, and this this Tom Reese and I were the were talking about it briefly at the end of the uh concluding mass for the first session.
00:10:59.039 --> 00:11:03.679
And you will remember uh Reese, he had been an editor of America Magazine.
00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:11.919
Um he had been censured at one point, um, he's resurfaced, he's one of the most knowledgeable commentators on the Catholic scene in Rome.
00:11:12.159 --> 00:11:26.399
And he um I said, Well, now we've just spent so much time uh watching, observing, tasting the enthusiasm, the fervor, and indeed the intelligence of the synodelegates.
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:31.519
Um, and they're having a great time, and there's 365 of them, including the Pope.
00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:34.240
What about the other 1.4 billion Catholics?
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:38.240
How are we going to be able to translate this to the Church Universal?
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:43.360
And he said, Michael, in my uh professional life, I'm a political scientist.
00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:47.200
And if one thing I know is it's this leadership.
00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:49.279
It will depend on the leadership.
00:11:49.440 --> 00:11:52.159
And I think that's true, and that's where we are now, Charlie.
00:11:52.799 --> 00:11:54.720
That's such a great way to think about it.
00:11:54.799 --> 00:12:24.879
And I want to commend one aspect of your book to our listeners and viewers, which is because you've structured it as this diary where you can sort of compare dates between the first and second session and you reflect on your experience of being at the Extraordinary Synod in 1985 as a way to think about the differences, it really opens up the recognition that this event in the history of the church isn't just a blip for its documents, but it might actually be a consequential change to how we think about being church.
00:12:25.039 --> 00:12:54.000
And that's where I want to bring Dan in, actually, which is to say, Dan, have you seen any ways in which Catholic life has felt some of the aftershocks of the synod in the way that Michael's been describing, both the structure of making room to not know what's going to come next, actually having conversations, but also embracing Catholic life where it's not a person at the dais speaking out, except for at these press conferences where we're rotating people, but the small circles are actually tables in a room.
00:12:54.159 --> 00:12:57.840
How have you seen this play out in Catholic life around the world in your work, Dan?
00:12:59.039 --> 00:12:59.360
Sure.
00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:08.240
Well, I think I think it's important to understand, um, just to add something before I get to directly to your question, right?
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:19.440
That you know, so much of this is a reception of um Vatican II, um, and really kind of right at the intersection of the letter and spirit of Vatican II, right?
00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:35.120
In the sense of the council fathers coming out of the council asked for a synod, um, and Paul VI sprung one on them um that was slightly different from what they had in mind, slightly more consultative and less legislative uh than they had in mind.
00:13:35.519 --> 00:13:52.159
Um, and so Francis bringing forward synodality and the synods in the way he did um was very much a way of revisiting that decision, um, right, somewhat by indirection, but also expanding the scope of it, right?
00:13:52.320 --> 00:14:03.679
Saying, yes, it's not just the synod of bishops, right, but um it's the the synod bringing synodality out to the rest of the church, right?
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:05.600
And that does move the goalposts, right?
00:14:05.759 --> 00:14:21.360
Because many of the critics of the last synod were focused on, well, it's really supposed to be the synod of bishops, uh, which is still giving the synod of bishops more credence than I think some of them might have given it uh before Francis started bringing synodality forward.
00:14:21.679 --> 00:14:31.200
So I think really, and again, the the beauty of synodality, right, is it plays out differently in different parts of the world.
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:32.000
Yes, right.
00:14:32.159 --> 00:14:46.000
So in the parts of the world where the church is thriving and growing, they're very much doing a lot of synodality because they don't have the experience of the top-down clerical church of the same kind as we have, because they don't have priests.
00:14:46.159 --> 00:14:46.799
Uh, right.
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:52.320
Because then, you know, this connects it to the synod on the Amazon, which Michael does discuss in his book, also, right?
00:14:52.480 --> 00:15:01.440
That uh, and which does get cited in uh sneak preview, the document we'll be discussing more next week on uh women in the life of the church, right?
00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:07.279
Um, but those people have been living a more synodal church because they have to do it themselves.
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:13.039
Um, we in the West are really kind of growing into this, whether we like it or not, right?
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:23.759
In the sense that in the face of secularization, right, in the face of fewer clergy, um, and certainly fewer clergy in the way that we are kind of accustomed to, right?
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:28.159
Um being part of the church means being part of a synodal church.
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:38.320
It means being part of a church where you are engaged in discussion and life um of the church with your neighbors because that's who the church is for you.
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:41.519
It's not the institution, it's not the hierarchy.
00:15:42.000 --> 00:15:44.080
I mean, Michael, you want to respond to Dan?
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:46.879
Yes, I think Dan's absolutely right, actually.
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:58.639
Um, you know, Francis made it clear again and again in his writings, but particularly also in the context of the synod, that he wanted to talk about the church as an inverted pyramid.
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:07.360
And so uh he pope and the hierarchy are not the top of the of the uh of the pyramid there uh any longer, they're at the bottom.
00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:13.919
And so the bishop of Rome, the supreme pontiff of the universal Roman jurisdiction or whatever, is actually the servant of the servants of God.
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:16.399
And this this was a big thing for him.
00:16:16.559 --> 00:16:25.919
One of the reasons why I think uh Francis achieved um during the course of his pontificate was the wonderful humanizing of the face of the papacy.
00:16:26.159 --> 00:16:37.120
And uh this was another illustration of his intention of making it, and uh well, I put this in brackets, more democratic in its uh in its living reality.
00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:48.720
So the the synod itself is uh an effort, an outcropping of many of the things that were released um uh by the capsule that needed articulation.
00:16:48.879 --> 00:17:04.799
And certainly the global church is more sinned in its very constitution than the European and American churches, which tend to rely on a more 19th-century continental model of deeply embedded hierarchy and control.
00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:06.960
And Francis wanted to move away from that.
00:17:07.039 --> 00:17:08.799
Of course, Francis was an Argentine, right?
00:17:08.880 --> 00:17:16.079
So, I mean, he his experience was a Latin American experience, very much like our current father, who also has 20 years of Latin American experience.
00:17:16.240 --> 00:17:18.400
It's a very different kind of a church.
00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:25.759
But I think uh for me, well, uh, because my approach was just to look at the characters, it's like a drama, right?
00:17:25.839 --> 00:17:37.680
And you understand this, because if you hook your own work in uh in theater and the interrelationship of the aesthetic with the religious sensibility, that a lot of what goes on in Rome is theater.
00:17:37.759 --> 00:17:41.519
And a lot, and and our liturgy is theater in an important way.
00:17:41.920 --> 00:17:48.079
So the the theater uh or the drama of the synod is to be found in a strummatus persona.
00:17:48.160 --> 00:17:49.359
So you look to the characters.
00:17:49.519 --> 00:17:50.160
What are they like?
00:17:50.240 --> 00:17:51.440
What were they expecting?
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:57.599
Well, how what did they what did they take from this great moment of dialogue and tension?
00:17:57.839 --> 00:18:02.880
And one of the things you you discovered, and again, when you're covering the synod, you're not actually in it.
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:06.079
You're not in the aula, you're outside the aula.
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:22.640
That is a disadvantage, but it's also an advantage because when you go to the press conferences, distinguished by the remarkable degree of transparency, by the way, uh, when you go to the press conferences and you talk to them private, you were reliving something of what happened in the original council.
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:32.000
I mean, when there were various people, like the greatest of all conciliar journalists, of course, was the American Xavier Ryn, which Mia was a pseudonym for Francis X.
00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:42.079
Murphy, writing for the New Yorker, it was greatly driven by talking to the people, talking to the people outside the aula, outside the Great Hall.
00:18:42.319 --> 00:18:44.319
And that's what I think many of us try to do.
00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:46.400
We try to try to replicate that.
00:18:46.559 --> 00:19:08.160
Uh, because there have been various apologia, uh, various um arguments, treatises, uh, compilations, anthologies, all about synodality, consultation around synod documents, early synod documents, and whatnot, wanted to try something a little different from that major corpus or canon and look at the characters.
00:19:08.319 --> 00:19:09.200
Who are the characters?
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:10.319
What are they doing?
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:12.880
What's some of the excitement that's in Rome?
00:19:13.039 --> 00:19:14.000
The tension.
00:19:14.160 --> 00:19:26.799
I mean, the the one that uh scene that I particularly enjoyed um was uh a remarkably clever young woman, um, a journalist, uh, an American, but educated in Switzerland and Germany.
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:29.279
And she um would always get up.
00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:42.640
She'd be the first speaker or the second speaker of the press conference, and she would hammer um the her interlocutor with a tough question, and she she would keep coming back to it until she got an answer, was always respectful.
00:19:42.799 --> 00:19:45.680
She employed all the honorifics and everything else.
00:19:45.839 --> 00:19:51.119
She wasn't uh casual or or dismissive, she just didn't believe them.
00:19:51.359 --> 00:19:54.400
And she kept pushing, she kept pushing, right?
00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:57.440
So she made a lot of enemies and she didn't care.
00:19:57.680 --> 00:20:07.920
Well, one day during uh a recess, we were standing on the uh Borgle, and uh she was eating some gelato, and she was by herself.
00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:09.680
And I felt sorry for her.
00:20:09.759 --> 00:20:14.240
And so I said to a couple of my colleagues who were with me, I said, I'm going to go over and talk to her.
00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:26.799
And so they came with me and I went over and I said, I want to congratulate you on the uh thoroughness of your research and the tenacity of uh your opinion and its delivery.
00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:29.200
She said, Oh, oh, she said, Do you agree with me?
00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:30.880
I said, No, I never agree with you.
00:20:31.119 --> 00:20:33.759
I said, I just appreciate the way you're doing it.
00:20:33.920 --> 00:20:40.319
So she looked at me and she said, You know, if it wasn't for your native Irish charm, I would hit you in the nose right now.
00:20:40.480 --> 00:20:47.920
So I turned to my colleagues and I said, For God's sake, don't tell her I'm not Irish, but English.
00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:52.240
But anyway, you know, you know, it's a survival tactic.
00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:59.599
But I, though, those kind of colorful moments, I think, uh speak to sometimes the intensity of encounters.
00:20:59.680 --> 00:21:07.680
Uh, and if that was true among the journalists, how much more true must it have been among many of the synodelicates themselves?
00:21:07.839 --> 00:21:31.440
And yet when they came out and when they were together in communion and they were at liturgy, and sometimes uh liturgical ceremonies outside uh Eucharist proper, um uh uh, you know, um a marvelous ceremony around reparation and sex abuse and everything else, there was a tremendous sense of the integrity and wholeness of the community.
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:37.200
And you can't um you you can't misrepresent that or caricature it.
00:21:37.359 --> 00:21:38.240
You have to feel it.
00:21:38.319 --> 00:21:43.119
And I I think there was an advantage, Charlie, in the fact that this was not my first in it.
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:49.680
Because I'm not caught up in Romanita, the the great excitement you have when you're in Rome the first time.
00:21:49.839 --> 00:21:51.119
Um, yeah, you go through that.
00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:52.720
It's like going to New York for the first time.
00:21:52.799 --> 00:21:56.319
You go through that, and then eventually you move beyond that, right?
00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.880
So um I'm way beyond that.
00:21:59.119 --> 00:22:12.319
So I I have no interest in writing something that's going to be a yahoy kind of jubilant text of celebration.
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:24.880
But at the same time, it was not my intention to write a negative vehicle propagandizing a cynical view that I may hold over church governance.
00:22:25.039 --> 00:22:28.319
I wanted to taste the experience of the synod.
00:22:28.400 --> 00:22:39.759
And I did this most effectively for myself at least by contrasting it with previous synod experiences to show what a significant rupture from the past this new Synod is.
00:22:40.400 --> 00:22:43.279
And you certainly achieve that with this book, Michael.
00:22:43.440 --> 00:22:53.599
It's uh one of the best things about it for me is because you invite us to thinking about this synod conversationally, between what has come before the rupture of this moment?
00:22:54.079 --> 00:22:56.720
It invites me to think about how it looks to the future.
00:22:56.880 --> 00:23:03.839
And we should spend a little bit of our remaining time thinking about one of those characters from the synod that was Robert Privost, who's now Pope Leo.
00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:06.000
And so I want to throw a question to both of you.
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:07.119
We'll start with Dan.
00:23:07.279 --> 00:23:10.720
Does synodality help us think about peace in any way?
00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:20.079
Are we seeing anything from Pope Leo's response to some of the global conflicts, particularly the war in Iran, right now in his calls for peace?
00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:27.599
Are there any ways that we see that connected to synodality or this sense of people talking to one another that Michael's opened up for us?
00:23:27.759 --> 00:23:37.519
Dan, what are some of your thoughts on some of the recent comments from uh Pope Leo around war in the world or even the situation of the world vis-a-vis the Vatican right now?
00:23:38.559 --> 00:23:55.599
Well, I think I think you can see ironically uh the commitment to synodality in um a pretty vicious uh Babylon B headline uh that came out the other day um criticizing Pope Leo, right?
00:23:55.759 --> 00:24:06.720
Now, um I'll read it verbatim, uh, but you know, and you have to be sort of uh you have to understand the the Babylon B's kind of way of doing things, right?
00:24:06.799 --> 00:24:12.079
So their supposedly Christian satire website that's gone kind of full MAGA, right?
00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:18.079
Um so their article is headlined, Pope condemns Allied forces for not just talking it out with Nazis.
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:19.279
Um, right.
00:24:19.359 --> 00:24:29.279
And this, of course, is warmongering um about the US um and Iran, of course, ironically, uh hitting somewhat close to Pius XII's approach to the actual Nazis.
00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:34.559
But um what it what it's doing is actually criticizing synodality.
00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:50.000
It's saying, right, how could you encourage the US to talk to the Iranian government, um, which has said all these nasty rhetorical things about the US over the years and all that, instead of just going ahead with war, right?
00:24:50.480 --> 00:24:58.880
Um, so clearly on that level, right, the way that Leo is approaching this is catching on in terms of negative traction.
00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:03.519
There's also an article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday by uh William McGuern, right?
00:25:03.759 --> 00:25:10.799
Basically accusing uh Pope Leo of not applying just war theory, when in fact he is applying just war theory.
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:20.079
Um so I think Leo, right, has been thrown very much into um having to pick up on the world being on fire, right?
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:26.799
Which is something that Francis certainly acknowledged, it's something that Leo has been um consistent on, right?
00:25:27.119 --> 00:25:41.039
Um, but I think the way he's doing it, right, is through precisely the kind of dialogical approach uh that Synodality recommends to us, um, and that I think he's learned as a religious, right?
00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:43.359
As somebody who's had to live with other people, right?
00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:47.599
It's somebody who's also been a missionary of in a culture that was foreign to him, right?
00:25:47.759 --> 00:25:53.759
Someone who had to be on the ground with people and dialogue with them and learn about them, um, right.
00:25:53.920 --> 00:26:02.799
And then as somebody who's also been involved in appointing bishops for um uh North America, Europe, and Latin America, right?
00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:11.759
Where again you're looking at quite different cultural contexts and trying to find the right way uh for the church to move forward in those places.
00:26:11.920 --> 00:26:29.920
So I think on that level, he's kind of living out um versions of synodality, um, even as again, in terms of planning for the kind of broader synodal project that's specifically discussed here, um, I think he's playing a somewhat longer game than Francis was.
00:26:30.079 --> 00:26:36.720
Francis, to use an American football analogy, was kind of running the two-minute offense uh for much of his pontificate, right?
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:43.440
Uh, where you're kind of like trying a lot of things, uh, you know, high risk, high reward things.
00:26:43.599 --> 00:27:04.640
Um, whereas I think Leo is trying to do a bit longer-term game planning uh in terms of how to make these things part of the life of the church rather than being viewed as some kind of charismatic gimmick, um, which um I think a lot of people who have been negative about the synod um have uh tried to portray it as.
00:27:05.119 --> 00:27:06.960
Michael, same question to you.
00:27:07.279 --> 00:27:19.680
Uh, I think there was a marvelous example of how synodality can have implications for geopolitical realities, um, ad extra or outside the church, if you like.
00:27:19.920 --> 00:27:56.160
In a conversation um in one of the press conferences when Cardinal Schoenberg, Christoph Schoenberg, the Dominican Archbishop Emeritus of Vienna, uh commented, and a great supporter of Francis, and a very keen supporter of synodality from the get-go, commented on a um uh kind of a learned, not kind of, but a learned official who said to him, you know, if we did these, if we acted the way you are, with this synodal model of engagement at the UN with which he was attached, uh, we would not have global war.
00:27:56.240 --> 00:27:58.400
We wouldn't be in the situation we're in right now.
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:26.799
And of course, it's easy to say that, and we do realize it's a rather rarefied moment to have all these 364 delegates or whatever gathered in Rome over a period of two years, is a special privileged grace moment, but it is uniquely elitist, if you like, in the in that it is not representative of the uh larger experience of the church, though the individual delegates would be largely representative of their constituencies.
00:28:26.960 --> 00:28:30.640
The number itself is minuscule by comparison, of course.
00:28:30.880 --> 00:28:35.759
And um, but how how we translate that experience is going to be the great challenge.
00:28:35.920 --> 00:28:36.799
I think Dan is right.
00:28:36.880 --> 00:28:39.839
I think Leo is committed to the long term, right?
00:28:40.240 --> 00:28:57.839
Um, and the an example of that, I think, and we discussed this uh Charlie fairly recently with regard to uh Leo's creating this extraordinary consistorio meeting in Rome, which he's now established as a template of synodal behavior.
00:28:58.000 --> 00:28:59.119
So, you know, he's there.
00:28:59.200 --> 00:29:00.400
He said, Well, what can I do?
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:04.799
I mean, how do I implement this model of serious conversation and listening?
00:29:04.960 --> 00:29:08.319
Well, I can't do it for the whole church, but I can do it with my advisors.
00:29:08.480 --> 00:29:14.480
I can do it with the people who I invited at the beginning of my pontificate to help me in the governance, right?
00:29:14.720 --> 00:29:21.680
So this is a way of uh institutionalizing or enacting that Synodal principle at his level.
00:29:21.839 --> 00:29:33.599
Now, if every bishop did this with their presbyteral councils, if every pastor did this in their uh in their community, then we would have synodality on a row because we know.
00:29:33.759 --> 00:29:50.559
We know that it's not going to be necessary to recreate the full structure uh with 10 people around the table with a facilitator and a redactor and using the three-point system, going around uh punctuating with silent, reverent listening prayer.
00:29:50.720 --> 00:29:52.079
It's not going to happen.
00:29:52.240 --> 00:29:57.599
It can happen and should happen at least once, but it's not going to happen irregularly.
00:29:57.759 --> 00:30:02.240
We have to find other modalities and ways of carrying synodality forward.
00:30:02.480 --> 00:30:10.960
But that fundamental experience, if you like, will be uh will be transformative in a way, and people will know what to expect.
00:30:11.119 --> 00:30:13.200
And that's what I think is really important.
00:30:13.440 --> 00:30:31.599
So it's a matter, to uh agree with Tom Reese on this, it's a matter now of implementing it uh at the appropriate level of leadership uh to actually implement another great uh doctrinal uh social doctrinal principle, subsidiarity in structural ecclesial terms.
00:30:31.759 --> 00:30:33.839
How do we allow this to work?
00:30:34.160 --> 00:30:37.839
Um, it's gonna take time, it'll be driven by personalities.
00:30:38.079 --> 00:30:40.319
Personalities make up the church.
00:30:40.480 --> 00:30:54.319
One of the reasons why the diary attempted to identify who some of these characters are, because there are they're, I mean, a church in Chicago or in Peoria or downtown Toronto or whatnot, they're gonna have all their own characters, right?
00:30:54.559 --> 00:30:57.440
And how do we lead with them?
00:30:57.759 --> 00:31:09.839
Oh, in this by saying that I truly believe this to be the case, that this is another wonderful instance where the church will rely on the wisdom, the charisms, and the genius of the laity.
00:31:10.160 --> 00:31:32.720
And it was not a surprise to me that it was during this period of sononal reflection and development that we both canonized and then declared a doctor of the church, the thinker most responsible for the recovery of the lay charism and the importance of consensus uh fidee in the church, John Henry Newman.
00:31:32.799 --> 00:31:44.000
So Newman, I hope, somewhere a theologian of consequence will, or a doctoral student of consequence, will take on the Newman component of synodality.
00:31:44.160 --> 00:32:03.200
What how did how did Newman provide uh some background and reflection uh on synodality, especially given his own patristic work and especially given his ressourcement tendency, but also his magnificent um 1859 on consulting the laity and matters of doctrine?
00:32:03.359 --> 00:32:12.480
I think that's such an important work, and it should be uh a working Bible for Synod uh delegates and those working on synodality in the church now.
00:32:12.880 --> 00:32:25.680
Michael, thank you so much for not only being our regular host for our podcast, but for also offering us such a rich resource to understand how the synod is going to affect the life of the church moving forward.
00:32:25.920 --> 00:32:42.480
But on that point about John Henry Newman, as we bring ourselves to a close, it's a reminder that here at Coraclesia, what we're trying to do is bring that sense of synodality and ressorts mol, that wonderful Catholic term for recovering the sources for their life today in conversation with others.
00:32:42.640 --> 00:32:51.279
And we're looking forward to the fact that one of the ways in which lay co-responsibility can cooperate with the Synodal Project is to keep having difficult conversations.
00:32:51.440 --> 00:33:18.319
Cora Klazen will be back very soon with some special guests to engage in some discussion about an output of the synod, reminding us that the whole point of synodality is to allow us to develop those relationships, those senses of the people that Michael gives us so wonderfully in his Synod Diary, so that we can then engage in some of the most difficult conversations that look to the signs of the times, so that our living tradition can continue to give life in the presence.
00:33:18.480 --> 00:33:22.640
I'm so honored that I got to host this conversation with you both this morning.
00:33:22.799 --> 00:33:27.519
And we look forward to this next edition of Core Clasia coming your way sooner than usual.
00:33:27.680 --> 00:33:28.480
Thanks so much, everyone.
00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:29.119
See you next week.
00:33:29.279 --> 00:33:29.920
Thank you, Jeremy.
00:33:30.079 --> 00:33:30.880
Thank you, Daniel.
