معلومات عن هذه الحلقة
Breitling relaunches Gallet on September 3rd. Openwork hosts Gabe Reilly and Asher Rapkin unpack Georges Kern's play: chronographs at 3,000–5,000 CHF, an exploration story aimed at Bremont, Longines, and Tudor, sold in Breitling boutiques. Plus Universal Genève and Breitling's return to Watches & Wonders.
Then a listener question: how has working in the industry changed our collecting? It starts with selling nearly everything to help fund Collective Horology — what survived, what still stings (the Urwerk collaboration, the MB&F LM101, the Lange Odysseus), and rebuilding from an empty watch box.
What came back is different: neo-vintage tool watches, Holthinrichs, Ming, Singer. Buying on the merits instead of the hype, why an Aquanaut lands differently outside collector context, and the freedom that comes from retailing independent watches.
Openwork is a weekly podcast about how the watch industry actually works. An unfiltered look behind the scenes — no press releases, no hype, and no sponsored takes. Hosted by Asher Rapkin and Gabe Reilly, co-founders of Collective Horology. Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube Music, or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can find us online at collectivehorology.com. To get in touch with suggestions, feedback or questions, email podcast@collectivehorology.com.
وتظهر الملاحظات 🔗
النص 🔗
00:01.057 --> 00:04.825
Everything in our safe is an extension of
00:05.325 --> 00:07.454
you and me and our point of view and what we believe in and who
00:07.486 --> 00:11.269
we want to support and the watches that fundamentally get us excited,
00:11.878 --> 00:13.545
the same way kind of collecting is.
00:14.940 --> 00:18.867
This is Open Work, a look inside the watch industry, a podcast
00:19.367 --> 00:23.163
from Collective Horology. I'm Gabe Riley, co-founder of Collective,
00:23.195 --> 00:26.481
and I'm Asher Rapkin, co-founder of Collective. Collective Horology is
00:26.981 --> 00:30.152
an independent watch retailer based in Ventura, California. We carry a
00:30.652 --> 00:34.003
wide range of independent brands in Chapek, Niton, Bamford,
00:34.083 --> 00:37.776
London, and more. To learn more about us and check out our available
00:37.873 --> 00:42.063
inventory, visit collectivehorology.com. Gabe, it is the
00:42.563 --> 00:46.110
middle of August. Mm-hmm. We're almost coming to the end of our, of our summer
00:46.126 --> 00:49.771
holiday schedule here. That's right, summer hours are winding down.
00:49.819 --> 00:53.223
This will be the last sort of biweekly episode,
00:53.271 --> 00:56.819
or every 2 weeks, and then we're gonna be back to weekly
00:57.319 --> 01:01.283
in at Geneva Watch Days. I was
01:01.299 --> 01:05.168
about to say, we— yes, we head to Geneva in about 2
01:05.668 --> 01:09.760
and a half weeks now for the 3-day extravaganza
01:10.260 --> 01:13.003
that is Geneva Watch Days. And of course, only 3 days for us. It is.
01:13.485 --> 01:17.274
Yeah, got it. But plus travel, plus travel. But we will— and
01:17.354 --> 01:20.613
obviously we'll report from the ground, only on the ground for 3 days. We always
01:21.113 --> 01:22.748
say we're going to change that and then we never do. I thought we were
01:23.248 --> 01:27.540
going for longer. That's brutal. Okay. All right. 3 days.
01:28.040 --> 01:31.440
Oh my God. You know, I mean, it's, it's,
01:31.940 --> 01:35.260
it's far away and we have kids. It's tough, but it's exciting.
01:35.760 --> 01:39.060
We already know about several novelties that are coming at Geneva Watch Days, which are
01:39.560 --> 01:43.180
awesome. Some of them have already been announced. The Singer V72,
01:43.680 --> 01:47.440
for example. Just today we got a press release about some
01:47.940 --> 01:50.360
new releases from— oh wait, you don't want— you don't like it when I beep
01:50.860 --> 01:52.010
things. Yeah, I don't want to have to beep. You don't have to beep.
01:52.040 --> 01:56.814
Come on. New releases from— and some other releases from and
01:57.314 --> 02:00.644
a few more releases from— so pretty excited about all
02:01.144 --> 02:04.267
of that. But most of all, Geneva Watch Days offers a great opportunity. Don't forget
02:04.331 --> 02:08.322
all the terrible releases from the really, the really, the really boring
02:08.354 --> 02:12.681
watches. Exactly. The really bad watch from— but
02:13.181 --> 02:16.897
anyway, all kidding aside, Geneva Watch Days is a great vibe and an amazing
02:17.009 --> 02:20.423
opportunity for collectors too, because unlike Watches and Wonders,
02:20.856 --> 02:23.741
which I would absolutely not advise collectors to attend,
02:24.110 --> 02:28.133
Geneva Watch Days is really something, is really one of those unusual hybrid events
02:28.633 --> 02:32.205
that actually works both for the business and for collectors.
02:32.718 --> 02:36.196
They've really managed to figure that part out. It's, it's pretty remarkable. See, I'm waiting
02:36.308 --> 02:39.819
for it to cross over into an event where the industry
02:39.835 --> 02:43.217
focus sort of takes over and then the collectors are second
02:43.717 --> 02:47.145
fiddle. I hope you're just grouchy because Cannes Lions got taken over by all the
02:47.645 --> 02:50.399
tech companies. Well, I'm waiting sort of for the same thing to happen. It feels
02:50.431 --> 02:53.958
inevitable. That might just be the cynic in me. I hope that isn't the case.
02:54.118 --> 02:57.788
I hope that Geneva Watch Days remains pure at heart and
02:57.869 --> 03:01.731
remains primarily collector-focused. And the
03:01.811 --> 03:05.273
benefit of that for us is like the vibe is just way more—
03:05.754 --> 03:08.526
So when we, when we bring on board our new head of content, we should
03:09.026 --> 03:12.565
ask him to craft a narrative for Geneva Watch Days. Let's not, let's not do
03:12.693 --> 03:15.177
that. Yes, we are. Who's working on the narrative?
03:15.819 --> 03:18.912
I'm sorry. How many people did we just trigger?
03:19.104 --> 03:22.133
Yeah. And most people are like, what are they even talking about? But there's one
03:22.245 --> 03:25.419
guy out there who does know. So, hey, guy, I see you. Someone knows.
03:25.531 --> 03:28.592
But Look, one of the things happening at Geneva Watch Days that
03:29.092 --> 03:31.798
I think is interesting, the big headline, the big industry story, at least that we're
03:31.847 --> 03:35.229
aware of now, is what's happening with Galay. So of course
03:35.729 --> 03:38.547
we've reported here that Breitling purchased Galay.
03:38.980 --> 03:42.378
They acquired the brand recently and they are relaunching the brand.
03:42.442 --> 03:45.616
They're telling us September 3rd in Switzerland,
03:45.648 --> 03:48.967
probably in Geneva. I went hunting for details. I'm sure
03:49.480 --> 03:52.702
only the press and their retailers know exactly where it's
03:53.202 --> 03:57.190
happening, but they're officially relaunching the brand by— they sort of soft
03:57.690 --> 04:01.166
launched it like there's a website, there's an Instagram account. Any photos
04:01.198 --> 04:04.949
of the watches? No, but they, they, in their, in the content that
04:05.449 --> 04:08.860
they do share, it's very focused on the vintage chronographs, of course. Surprise, surprise.
04:09.036 --> 04:11.746
And this, I, you know, really around this territory,
04:12.483 --> 04:16.635
which I think is interesting from a business standpoint, of exploration.
04:17.068 --> 04:19.103
So what do you mean? Hiking,
04:19.937 --> 04:23.848
expeditions, those sorts of things. It feels very much in the world
04:24.025 --> 04:27.231
of kind of the Rolex Explorer, but which is strange for a
04:27.731 --> 04:30.604
chronograph. But more specifically, it feels feels like they're,
04:30.847 --> 04:34.259
at least from a brand positioning standpoint, they're kind of going after like
04:34.759 --> 04:38.205
the territory Bremont is trying to carve
04:38.705 --> 04:42.108
out, and at a similar price point. So Galet, they've said they're going
04:42.608 --> 04:45.912
to launch new watches. They'll primarily be chronographs. They'll be
04:46.041 --> 04:49.411
in the $3,000 to $5,000 Swiss franc range, so a
04:49.911 --> 04:53.219
notch below Breitling for, for sure. And they're
04:53.719 --> 04:57.457
very much going after this exploration and adventuring brand.
04:57.506 --> 05:00.858
That sounds more like they're going after Tudor. Yeah, I think
05:01.358 --> 05:05.507
Tudor's a bit all over the map. I mean, there's definitely like the North Flag
05:06.007 --> 05:09.001
was all about that. And then the Ranger, of course, is in that, in that
05:09.066 --> 05:11.967
space. But Tudor really flexes into diving,
05:12.095 --> 05:16.103
into racing, into cycling. Oh, I see what you're saying. So you're
05:16.603 --> 05:20.223
saying that their positioning is much more about outdoor exploration and adventuring.
05:20.351 --> 05:23.765
And that's definitely a territory like Bremont has
05:23.861 --> 05:27.372
gone after hard. Vacheron actually, to some extent, has done
05:27.388 --> 05:30.370
that. But boy, that's really interesting when you look at it in the context of
05:30.870 --> 05:35.034
just Breitling in general. So if you have this sort of like competitively priced
05:35.082 --> 05:38.128
fieldy slash adventure, you know,
05:38.208 --> 05:41.991
outdoorsy brand, then Bremont— pardon
05:42.491 --> 05:46.111
me, Breitling, which is, you know, obviously it's sea, land, and air.
05:46.784 --> 05:49.750
So yeah, it's a— the air thing is pretty broad. Yes,
05:49.830 --> 05:53.213
the sea, like they've done a pretty solid job of developing that too. So,
05:53.357 --> 05:56.162
you know, but, but definitely, yeah, Breitling is definitely air first.
05:56.322 --> 05:59.865
Yeah, and they have a long heritage in aeronautics that I think is pretty defensible,
06:00.330 --> 06:03.794
you know. And then you get to Universal Genève, which, look, I was discussed on
06:04.294 --> 06:07.472
the pod before, these watches, you know, I'll leave it up to someone to make
06:07.972 --> 06:10.154
a decision about whether it's worth it or whatever, but like objectively they're attractive,
06:10.604 --> 06:15.246
you know. So you have this sort of luxury upscale vintagey
06:15.278 --> 06:19.455
brand, you have this aeronautics-inspired luxury mass-market
06:19.955 --> 06:23.968
luxury brand, and now what it sounds like is sort of enthusiast-focused outdoorsy,
06:24.257 --> 06:28.096
you know, field watchy kind of thing. Yeah, feels like they're going after Bremont and
06:28.353 --> 06:32.202
Longines. From like a price positioning and a brand standpoint and
06:32.282 --> 06:35.648
all that and that kind of stuff. And, you know, and Longines, as we've discussed,
06:35.664 --> 06:39.063
has definitely been like making strides in getting collector attention, especially with that
06:39.191 --> 06:42.701
new diver. They have a lot of the same ingredients. Obviously, it's a,
06:42.798 --> 06:46.068
it's a storied heritage brand. Chronographs have been a focus.
06:46.164 --> 06:49.498
The price positioning is similar and all that kind of stuff. So it'll be very
06:49.530 --> 06:53.009
interesting to see. What we're hearing is it'll be chronograph focused, which again,
06:53.538 --> 06:56.632
I think is actually kind of unexpected. You know, when you think chronographs,
06:56.664 --> 06:59.774
you think automotive or you think medical
07:00.274 --> 07:04.647
uses like for pulsation or you think, you think of flying
07:04.903 --> 07:08.654
oftentimes, flight and aviation, but you don't really think of
07:08.831 --> 07:12.261
outdoor adventuring. Yeah. So it'll be interesting to see how they thread
07:12.293 --> 07:15.643
that, that needle. But that's where a lot of their content and their sponsorships
07:15.659 --> 07:19.555
are, are focused. And again, very much going after the lunch of some of those,
07:19.811 --> 07:23.130
those competitors. They're only going to be distributed, at least to
07:23.162 --> 07:26.897
start, apparently in Breitling boutiques. I did a little research. Well, does that
07:27.397 --> 07:31.064
mean authorized dealers? And apparently it means like Breitling-focused. Well, on the website
07:31.564 --> 07:35.023
it literally says like manufactured Breitling. Yeah, that's the other thing. They're sort of positioning
07:35.135 --> 07:38.308
Breitling as like Intel inside, you know, like giving,
07:38.885 --> 07:42.619
giving the Galet watches some credibility. I wonder if they'll run
07:42.892 --> 07:46.401
on B01 chronograph movements. I have no
07:46.417 --> 07:49.799
idea. I would find that hard to believe given the price point, but, but maybe.
07:49.879 --> 07:53.452
But it's, it's really interesting. They're using the Breitling brand
07:54.029 --> 07:57.138
to give some shine to Galet in the way that other brands,
07:57.555 --> 08:00.920
you know, with this house of brands setup similar to Breitling now, don't.
08:01.000 --> 08:04.205
Like Rolex, it's not like Tudor by Rolex.
08:04.526 --> 08:07.443
Or— well, it sort of was back in the day, but they never— they never—
08:07.943 --> 08:11.820
I mean, like, in the sense that there were like components. Yeah, but they didn't—
08:11.900 --> 08:15.651
it wasn't like Tudor by Rolex. Yeah, you know, and this is very much— yeah,
08:15.667 --> 08:18.665
you're right, on the website it's kind of like a Galley by Breitling, or they're
08:19.165 --> 08:22.689
reminding you that Breitling is involved, which is probably smart because most people
08:22.801 --> 08:26.392
have never heard of Galley. You know, it's a very inside world.
08:26.664 --> 08:29.229
Those who are familiar with the brand or would sort of view it as a
08:29.729 --> 08:32.884
desirable thing or very dialed-in kind of vintage collectors.
08:33.637 --> 08:37.292
No matter how you cut it, I'm curious. I'm very curious.
08:37.501 --> 08:40.771
So we'll see how they do it. The other thing that's interesting, the news from,
08:40.835 --> 08:43.865
from the House of Brands over at Breitling is they're joining
08:44.458 --> 08:47.904
Watches and Wonders this coming year, which makes sense now that they
08:48.404 --> 08:51.639
have this House of Brands. They can get all 3 probably into one booth
08:51.687 --> 08:55.326
again because presumably at retail, UG is
08:55.438 --> 08:58.981
going to be available through some Breitling boutiques. Galley is going to be available through
08:59.045 --> 09:03.181
300 Breitling boutiques. They can show up together. There's a clear link between
09:03.438 --> 09:07.365
brands. So there's a kind of an economy of scale for them, and they hadn't
09:07.525 --> 09:11.228
relaunched UG yet. Of course they did around the time of Watches
09:11.728 --> 09:15.027
and Wonders, but you know, they did it off the beaten path. Now they will
09:15.060 --> 09:18.618
have launched Galet with product, so kind
09:19.118 --> 09:22.369
of makes sense for them to join Watches and Wonders. But that was surprising because
09:22.869 --> 09:26.425
we sort of talked about Breitling as this rogue brand that kind of goes
09:26.457 --> 09:30.577
its own way and likes being a bit unpredictable. Yeah, look, all of this boils
09:31.077 --> 09:33.975
down to one very key fact, which has been proven again and again and again
09:34.475 --> 09:37.710
in the watch industry, which is underestimate George Kern at your own peril. Yeah.
09:38.303 --> 09:41.526
You know, I wonder if it tells us that, that they may be looking for
09:42.026 --> 09:45.020
additional doors for Galley. That might be a reason why they show up. Well,
09:45.196 --> 09:48.980
if we, if we go back to, to, as listeners know, my favorite
09:49.480 --> 09:52.314
brand, AP, you could— that was your theory. Well,
09:52.490 --> 09:55.408
that was my theory. How did it turn out? It turned out, so far as
09:55.456 --> 09:59.223
I can tell, to be untrue, which makes me wonder if maybe it
09:59.723 --> 10:02.415
really is like a media and press play. You know, and just like, well,
10:02.463 --> 10:05.272
we can't really get the attention if we're not sat at the table. Yeah.
10:05.433 --> 10:09.461
So it could be that. Yeah. So I don't know, but I
10:09.509 --> 10:12.880
am confident that especially based with what—
10:13.380 --> 10:15.271
and I haven't gone hands-on with them yet and I very much would like to,
10:15.287 --> 10:18.786
but everything that I've seen and heard in the live photos
10:19.043 --> 10:21.852
and by speaking to people who have had meetings with Universal Genève,
10:22.173 --> 10:26.138
the watches are really good. Yeah. And sure,
10:26.266 --> 10:29.941
they're on the higher end of reasonable, but I don't think they're unreasonable. For what
10:30.117 --> 10:33.724
you're getting. And I bet you with Galet, if they're smart and you look at
10:34.224 --> 10:37.170
it and it's sort of in the, you know, it's priced similarly, like reasonably or
10:37.670 --> 10:40.152
on the higher end of reasonable, but they're doing something really interesting with it.
10:41.338 --> 10:45.169
I'm interested. The other question that I find fascinating
10:45.266 --> 10:47.686
here is around Breitling boutiques.
10:48.552 --> 10:52.191
So this is an interesting one. So Breitling, Breitling is a brand that
10:52.992 --> 10:56.390
sort of sits, you know, there are enthusiasts that are into
10:56.423 --> 11:00.254
Breitling. Absolutely. Yes. Whether it's like Cosmonaut
11:00.754 --> 11:04.051
in particular, a lot of the quirkier watches, the Cosmonaute, the Aerospace. Yeah.
11:04.516 --> 11:07.544
Oh yeah, Aerospace Evo, great watch. May it, may it, you know, long may it—
11:07.640 --> 11:10.924
there are a lot of people who really love the, the dive watches,
11:10.988 --> 11:14.369
whether the Superocean. Yeah. And there are versions of the Superocean I
11:14.869 --> 11:18.454
think are pretty cool. But my point being, I think the majority of people who
11:18.954 --> 11:22.027
buy Breitling, you know, it's a major— it's a mass-market luxury
11:22.059 --> 11:25.503
brand. They move so many units that I think that there is a segment of
11:26.003 --> 11:29.685
it that is driven by enthusiasts, but there's also a pretty meaningful chunk of
11:29.733 --> 11:32.795
it that's just like, I want to buy a nice watch. Breitling is a brand
11:33.295 --> 11:35.269
that appeals to me either aesthetically or I recognize the brand. I'm going to go
11:35.285 --> 11:38.882
buy it. Yes, I think that's probably the majority of them. Yeah. So here's the
11:39.382 --> 11:42.897
question then. Galay is probably going to be much more of an
11:43.397 --> 11:46.222
enthusiast drive, at least at the outset. Who knows where the brand will develop,
11:46.366 --> 11:50.301
but certainly at the outset, Universal Genève for sure. So the
11:50.801 --> 11:54.445
question becomes, is the— are the Breitling boutiques equipped for
11:54.477 --> 11:58.299
that? Because that is a different profile of salesperson.
11:58.636 --> 12:01.778
And those Breitling boutiques— the other thing is I just thinking about when you say
12:02.278 --> 12:05.433
that, the way Breitling boutiques are built out, I will give Breitling
12:05.689 --> 12:09.633
credit for their boutiques. If you look at a Breitling boutique
12:10.133 --> 12:13.528
or a shop-in-shop, it definitely has its own vibe. It's very
12:13.640 --> 12:18.065
clearly Breitling branded. It's very clearly aviation focused.
12:18.513 --> 12:22.441
But there's a lot of like exposed brick, a lot of like leather.
12:22.537 --> 12:25.871
It's not quite like your central casting luxury
12:25.967 --> 12:29.189
watch boutique. You know, if you think of like if you run into like a
12:29.254 --> 12:32.924
JLC boutique boutique, or, you know, insert luxury
12:33.197 --> 12:36.227
Patek boutique, insert luxury watch brand here. Like,
12:36.563 --> 12:40.122
Breitling actually— it's a little more rock and roll, it's a little more rough
12:40.250 --> 12:44.258
around the edges, and has such a clear identity that's
12:44.322 --> 12:47.384
really focused around the Breitling brand and being different in that way.
12:47.704 --> 12:51.119
Can it hang together Universal Genève
12:51.375 --> 12:55.062
and Galée? Well, I just wonder, like, what's the cross-sales conversation there,
12:55.142 --> 12:58.557
right? Like, yeah, no, I'm serious. Like, if somebody walks into
12:58.605 --> 13:02.260
a Breitling boutique, excluding someone who comes in, is like, can I look at
13:02.757 --> 13:05.529
Like, okay. Yeah. They just want like a, they're just, they want a cool,
13:05.593 --> 13:08.767
nice luxury dive watch. And then someone's like, well, take a look at this
13:09.267 --> 13:13.399
Galet. And I'll explain, I'll explain why that's weird. Sure. There's lots of stores
13:13.447 --> 13:16.637
that have Rolex and Tudor, but there are no Rolex boutiques
13:17.137 --> 13:20.211
with Tudors in them. Right. Right. Yeah. Cause that'd be weird, right?
13:20.323 --> 13:23.401
Yes. Yeah. You know, it's like, oh, like, oh, but you know, but sir,
13:23.529 --> 13:27.183
the Submariner is the peak of diving watches. That's why they have CPO
13:27.215 --> 13:30.597
instead. That's how you, that's how you divert a Rolex buyer.
13:31.046 --> 13:34.124
To another watch. Sure. But I'm not, I'm not making that point. I'm just— toward
13:34.188 --> 13:37.923
Tudor. Yeah. But my point is like, it would be a weird conversation
13:37.955 --> 13:40.552
to have. Right. So I wonder,
13:40.920 --> 13:44.607
and they're sort of like positioning Galet with, you know,
13:44.687 --> 13:48.342
Galet is to Breitling as Tudor is
13:48.374 --> 13:51.869
to Rolex. Right. Because they're doing that on their website. Breitling is
13:51.901 --> 13:55.555
an ingredient brand in Galet and there's a heavy overlap on chronographs.
13:55.972 --> 14:00.080
Yeah, exactly. So I just wonder what that's gonna look like
14:00.561 --> 14:03.901
and what that cross-sell would be, how it doesn't cannibalize an
14:04.013 --> 14:07.803
entry-level Breitling even though the prices are significantly different.
14:07.851 --> 14:11.624
I think like an entry-level B01 chrono from them is like pushing $8,000 or $9,000
14:12.124 --> 14:15.670
now. Yeah, US. But anyway, just strategically, that's interesting. Goes back to the Tudor
14:15.734 --> 14:19.925
thing of like we talked about what the fundamental paradox with Tudor, as successful
14:19.973 --> 14:23.441
as it's been, is it lives in the shadow of Rolex. And as they
14:23.941 --> 14:27.341
try to grow and popularize the brand, will a brand conscious person
14:27.454 --> 14:31.365
be able to get over the fact that it's not a Rolex? And to
14:31.865 --> 14:35.341
your point, Tudor and Rolex have been very deliberate about keeping the brands separate.
14:35.389 --> 14:38.675
Yes, they're in some of the same multi-brand boutiques, but you never have a Tudor
14:39.175 --> 14:42.955
sold out of a Rolex-dedicated boutique. Now, CPO plays the role
14:43.147 --> 14:45.776
of the place you point someone who can't get their hands on a Rolex.
14:46.433 --> 14:49.992
Is Breitling setting up Galet to fail from
14:50.056 --> 14:53.871
a brand positioning standpoint by tying it so clearly to Breitling
14:54.288 --> 14:58.280
as like a lesser baby Breitling? Will Breitling— will Galet
14:58.780 --> 15:01.964
therefore ever be able to get out of the shadow and graduate beyond that when
15:02.061 --> 15:05.649
its identity is so intertwined now with Breitling? Well,
15:05.665 --> 15:09.142
hearing you say that, I— a counterpoint comes into my mind,
15:09.286 --> 15:13.067
which is the Ralph Lauren boutique on 72nd Street
15:13.195 --> 15:16.688
in New York City. Can you get Polo Sport there? Well, you can get all
15:17.201 --> 15:21.142
of the Ralph Lauren brands from Polo all the way up to Purple Label.
15:21.302 --> 15:25.163
Double RL? Yeah. And they, they organize it.
15:25.227 --> 15:28.495
But now the difference there, though, is that you can't get chaps there, though.
15:30.197 --> 15:33.729
But you— but like, like literal chaps or the brand? No, the brand Chaps.
15:33.809 --> 15:36.859
Like, to me it's like, you look— you're looking— you're looking for chaps,
15:36.876 --> 15:39.958
man? Galay is to Breitling as Chaps is to
15:39.990 --> 15:43.955
Polo Ralph Lauren. Okay, I just keep talking about chaps.
15:45.224 --> 15:48.178
I know it's funny, but like that— I, I hear what you're saying, but they
15:48.678 --> 15:52.592
don't put— they don't put Chaps in, in that store in 72nd
15:53.092 --> 15:56.429
Street. No, no, but, but Polo Ralph Lauren is probably the entry-level brand there.
15:56.510 --> 15:59.702
It is. But my point about that though is that Polo,
16:00.359 --> 16:03.389
Ralph Lauren, Double RL, Black Label,
16:03.582 --> 16:07.477
Purple Label, all of these have different aesthetic and creative angles
16:07.509 --> 16:11.661
to them, right? Like Purple Label has always been about like trying to ape
16:12.302 --> 16:15.604
the sort of sartorial Italian vibe. Sure. You know,
16:16.406 --> 16:19.499
and have the construction that, that justifies the price point.
16:20.012 --> 16:22.657
You know, Double RL is like very Americana,
16:23.202 --> 16:27.050
vintage-driven, you know, etc. and so forth. So each of those brands are less
16:27.550 --> 16:30.624
of a cross-sell and more of a vibe. And sure, they're at different price points.
16:31.073 --> 16:33.044
But if you were to go in there and say to a stylist, like,
16:33.060 --> 16:36.281
here are the things that I'm looking for, you know, they would drop— you could
16:36.781 --> 16:39.470
walk out with a pretty cool— yeah, you could walk out with, with like some
16:39.970 --> 16:43.012
work shirts from RRL, some sartorial stuff for a suit, like whatever. Or if you
16:43.512 --> 16:47.354
just want a polo shirt or some chaps. But, but my point is, you know,
16:47.403 --> 16:50.896
you really don't remember the brand Chaps? I don't, but I, but I'm
16:50.944 --> 16:54.197
just like driven by my image of you wandering around in chaps in a center.
16:54.406 --> 16:57.867
No, so Chaps, like, you know, like British, like Chaps
16:58.300 --> 17:01.905
is, is like the, the cheaper version of Polo Ralph Lauren.
17:02.562 --> 17:05.929
It's Chaps by Ralph Lauren. It's a sub-brand that's like sportier,
17:06.153 --> 17:09.776
less formal, and cheaper. It would be sold at like TJ Maxx
17:10.276 --> 17:13.431
or Macy's versus— sure, that's my point. I think, I think in the hierarchy
17:13.463 --> 17:17.278
of brands, Galay would be a higher ranking brand relative
17:17.310 --> 17:20.564
to the— anyway, without getting too deep into this metaphor, Chaps by Breitling.
17:21.302 --> 17:24.572
Yeah, exactly. Pinbuckle by Breitling.
17:25.069 --> 17:28.836
Look, I— what was it? What was it like the, the 19— like
17:28.852 --> 17:32.667
early aughts thing? It's like the 2-word names. It's like Garlic and Pinbuckle
17:32.779 --> 17:36.019
by Breitling or something. Yeah. The cafe from Breitling. Yeah, you have to have an
17:36.067 --> 17:39.548
ampersand or a plus sign. Oh my God. Okay. Anyway, back, back on
17:39.596 --> 17:43.093
track. My point is it would be interesting
17:44.007 --> 17:47.568
if they pivot the way that they look at clients. Like if you come into
17:47.601 --> 17:50.761
a Breitling boutique, let's imagine there's a Breitling boutique like in New York, that big
17:51.261 --> 17:54.996
one on 57th Street, and that becomes a House of Breitling kind of store name.
17:55.060 --> 17:58.765
They'd have to redesign every floor. Forget about that for a second. But let's assume
17:59.265 --> 18:01.957
that they use that real estate that they have to do that. Okay. That's kind
18:02.457 --> 18:05.724
of interesting to me because then it's kind of like the Grand Seiko boutique
18:05.804 --> 18:08.754
in the sense that like, sure, there's the, you know,
18:09.106 --> 18:12.184
there's a handful of Creedors available in like the very special room.
18:12.793 --> 18:16.336
There's the main Grand Seiko line. And I don't think they sell it anymore.
18:16.384 --> 18:19.045
But back in the day, they used to sell Seiko or Prospex or things like
18:19.545 --> 18:23.053
that there too. And there— and those things weren't necessarily in opposition to each other
18:23.373 --> 18:26.162
and they weren't in opposition to the buyer either. Like, sure, there were guys that
18:26.662 --> 18:28.759
came in and wanted a Cocktail Time and that was it. But there were also
18:29.259 --> 18:31.901
guys that came in that wanted a Cocktail Time and an Ichi-2, and they were
18:31.933 --> 18:35.800
able to speak to both of them Because each of them met a different—
18:36.300 --> 18:38.700
I'm not saying that was then, this is now. And there's a reason why Seiko
18:39.200 --> 18:42.660
backed off that strategy and now has dedicated Grand Seiko boutiques. I'm with you.
18:43.160 --> 18:45.040
I'm just trying to— I'm just trying to work it out. Yeah, I get you.
18:45.540 --> 18:48.430
I think the Ralph Lauren— why isn't it just Ralph Lauren?
18:48.620 --> 18:52.160
But people say Ralph Lauren. It's even if it is his name, Ralph Lifshitz.
18:52.680 --> 18:55.480
Like, I think that's his actual name, to be honest with you. Like, my major
18:55.980 --> 18:59.660
connection to the Bronx, my major connection to that brand was when—
19:00.160 --> 19:03.180
was when what's-her-face Jennifer Aniston's character worked there on Friends. Oh, interesting. Remember that whole
19:03.680 --> 19:06.590
storyline? Sure. Yeah. And there— yeah, anyway, whatever.
19:07.055 --> 19:11.303
But Ralph Lauren or Ralph Lauren or Ralph Lifshitz, whatever. Rachel. That's Rachel.
19:11.528 --> 19:15.311
Yeah. So I think that's a— that's an interesting one because you're right, it works,
19:15.535 --> 19:19.286
works kind of well there. I think this is a tightrope that
19:19.318 --> 19:22.701
brands have tried to walk and it won't— it won't be easy to do if
19:22.749 --> 19:25.378
they— Yeah. But you know what, though? As I'm talking about this, I think the
19:25.410 --> 19:28.904
part that's actually like cool is I'm actually like excited and curious
19:28.953 --> 19:33.794
about this because let's be honest, a lot of brands that enter in the sub-$5,000
19:33.810 --> 19:36.887
US range are, with a few extremely notable exceptions,
19:37.272 --> 19:40.674
are usually highly derivative. Yes. And to his credit— or,
19:40.786 --> 19:44.733
or they try way too hard, you know? And this offers like
19:45.233 --> 19:49.674
this really interesting path of something that could be aesthetically appealing,
19:50.091 --> 19:53.541
potentially technically interesting, have some heritage.
19:53.861 --> 19:57.808
Maybe they're trying to give themselves permission to bust out of like what the
19:57.872 --> 20:01.530
historical tropes are. Like, depending on how much of a
20:01.578 --> 20:04.757
risk they're willing to take, this could be really cool.
20:05.576 --> 20:08.580
I'm really curious. And to his credit, look, we've talked all the time on this
20:08.644 --> 20:12.563
podcast that the watch— the segment of the watch market that's
20:12.579 --> 20:16.177
booming is in the $20,000 and up segment. Generally, volumes of
20:16.677 --> 20:20.144
watches out coming out of Switzerland are going down, but the industry is growing on
20:20.644 --> 20:23.613
the back of price increases and higher-priced watches.
20:24.208 --> 20:27.886
And so I do think George Kern is, is doing something
20:28.303 --> 20:31.854
that is very long-term in its thinking, which is saying, I'm not
20:32.354 --> 20:35.645
just going to launch UG as a complementary brand to Breitling. I'm going to
20:35.710 --> 20:38.152
think about how I'm building a stable. I'm going to build a stable, and I'm
20:38.652 --> 20:41.541
going to build something at a price point which is the toughest price point in
20:41.654 --> 20:45.397
watches, where you're right, things are very derivative. It's extremely
20:45.494 --> 20:49.349
crowded. And so just by nature of how crowded
20:49.430 --> 20:52.836
it is, it's hard to— it's hard to break in and do well. But then
20:53.336 --> 20:56.641
it's a segment of, of the watch industry that is really struggling.
20:57.074 --> 21:01.065
So I do think he deserves credit for some long-term thinking here, and how they
21:01.565 --> 21:05.025
do it and how they— how it plays out will be fascinating because Breitling is
21:05.525 --> 21:08.968
so defined by Breitling. And I'm also gonna question my own assumptions on
21:09.016 --> 21:12.735
this one before we move on. I was very skeptical of Universal
21:12.767 --> 21:16.038
Genève. I am much less skeptical about
21:16.150 --> 21:18.811
UG now that I've seen what they did. I really want to look— I'm gonna
21:19.311 --> 21:21.937
see if I can try to get an appointment to see some of those UG
21:22.161 --> 21:25.527
watches, or just get to sneak in there to see some. Yeah, I would like
21:26.027 --> 21:28.480
to see that too. And it's less about like, oh, I think they should join
21:28.980 --> 21:30.740
our roster. I think it's more like— I want to see what they're doing.
21:30.760 --> 21:33.920
Me too. So if anyone from UG hears this,
21:34.320 --> 21:38.220
we'd like to see you. I requested press media credentials.
21:38.720 --> 21:41.820
So, and you can select which brands you want to hear from or have an
21:42.320 --> 21:44.680
appointment with. You're going to get like one of those little hats with the little
21:45.180 --> 21:48.680
press tab. Yeah, exactly. You know, I went to high school with a kid in
21:49.180 --> 21:51.720
high school and he wore one of those hats with a little press tab.
21:52.220 --> 21:55.780
And he was like, uh, at age 17, he was, he would
21:56.280 --> 21:57.720
have like a police scanner and follow fire trucks around Brooklyn.
21:59.704 --> 22:02.913
Really? And when we were like, like juniors in high school,
22:03.362 --> 22:07.421
he had a photo of like a fire scene like on the front page,
22:07.469 --> 22:11.111
like front cover of the Daily News. No way. Yeah, Mark Herman.
22:11.609 --> 22:14.737
He was like— and he, he did the whole shtick where he like
22:15.237 --> 22:18.556
dressed up like the 1950s press guy with the hat with the card in
22:18.668 --> 22:21.925
it and all. It was amazing. Get that man a Universal Genève.
22:21.973 --> 22:25.599
Really cool, really cool dude. And yeah, that, that was
22:25.663 --> 22:28.439
wild. But in any event, I'm really curious to see those watches.
22:29.176 --> 22:32.220
And that's my method of subterfuge. Like all the brands we
22:32.720 --> 22:35.873
can't get a meeting with on commercial terms, I'm trying to sneak in through the
22:36.642 --> 22:39.735
media door. I'm just, as someone who works in this business,
22:39.847 --> 22:43.500
I'm just real curious. Yeah. So speaking of curious,
22:44.237 --> 22:47.906
the focus of today's episode is actually
22:47.922 --> 22:51.190
a listener question. And we actually got a few different kinds
22:51.286 --> 22:54.555
of versions of this question, which I found really interesting. It came
22:54.603 --> 22:59.203
up enough in enough different ways that I think it's actually worth worth
22:59.380 --> 23:02.577
really the episode, which is this, this question, which is,
23:03.091 --> 23:07.397
how has becoming part of the watch industry changed your collecting?
23:08.071 --> 23:11.300
And if we have time, there's a couple riffs on that, questions related to it,
23:11.349 --> 23:14.690
which I think are interesting. But, you know, normally we don't talk about our
23:14.738 --> 23:18.658
collections or our collecting, but look, this came up enough that there's
23:19.158 --> 23:22.498
some signal, I think, from the, the, the question. And more importantly,
23:22.948 --> 23:26.208
it's a question about how has the business of watches the thing
23:26.305 --> 23:29.549
we talk about this on this podcast, how does that intersect with and how
23:29.661 --> 23:33.306
has it impacted us as collectors? And I'll
23:33.806 --> 23:37.626
start here with the big one, which is probably
23:38.126 --> 23:42.090
not what people are expecting, but building this business
23:42.668 --> 23:46.538
required a lot of capital. And some of the best advice that
23:46.619 --> 23:50.151
we got was from Mike DeMartini
23:50.232 --> 23:53.827
of Everest Brands and of Monta, which is The
23:53.843 --> 23:57.129
business will probably take more money than you have, but less than you
23:57.629 --> 24:01.008
think you need. And do everything you can not to give
24:01.281 --> 24:05.080
any piece of your business as an equity to anyone else.
24:05.208 --> 24:08.751
Don't take outside money. Do what you can to figure it out. And so one
24:09.251 --> 24:11.780
of the ways we figured it out was through,
24:12.694 --> 24:15.884
I know you did, I did too, selling off most of our watch
24:16.384 --> 24:19.539
collections at the time. So the biggest
24:19.635 --> 24:22.990
way going into this industry has impacted,
24:23.103 --> 24:27.101
or impacted my collection and my collecting, was it just— it started by
24:27.358 --> 24:31.229
blowing a big, a big hole in my,
24:31.534 --> 24:34.280
my collection. Oh, I just had this conversation. Nothing left.
24:34.729 --> 24:38.343
2 watches survived the, the business, which was my
24:38.843 --> 24:42.662
Facebook Tudor Black Bay— can't give that up— and this
24:42.695 --> 24:45.665
should tell you something, an IWC 3706,
24:45.682 --> 24:49.258
so the original Pilot its chronograph. I kept,
24:49.338 --> 24:52.895
I kept my kids' birth watches. I kept that Black Bay just as you
24:53.395 --> 24:57.142
did. And I kept the C3, the IWC collab that we did.
24:57.446 --> 25:00.923
Yeah, I do have that. There are a couple that sort of survived through the
25:01.131 --> 25:04.640
process, I guess. Including your Seikos. We all kept our Seikos. No, I got rid
25:05.140 --> 25:06.964
of a lot of my Seikos. You got to figure out how to make it
25:07.464 --> 25:10.617
work sometimes. I guess it's interesting. I thought you were going to go somewhere else
25:10.729 --> 25:14.302
with that, which is, I mean, I did that too. So yeah, I thought
25:14.334 --> 25:17.959
you were going to go to we don't like— because we now know what's
25:18.459 --> 25:22.113
involved, I am very careful, even in a context of like professional
25:22.613 --> 25:26.060
courtesy, not to expect anybody to do me any favors when I buy a watch,
25:26.461 --> 25:28.803
which I think is interesting. Oh, that's it. That never even occurred to me.
25:28.851 --> 25:32.364
Yeah. Well, so look, anyone who's ever bought a watch from us knows
25:32.717 --> 25:36.439
that we are— that we don't discount. And the reason why we don't discount
25:36.503 --> 25:39.166
fundamentally is because we believe in the brands that we retail.
25:39.439 --> 25:42.037
And if we want to see secondary values stay high,
25:42.502 --> 25:45.626
and we also want to represent brands and maintain their integrity, we have to hold
25:46.126 --> 25:48.911
that line. And I get why people don't like that, because everybody wants to pay
25:48.975 --> 25:52.435
the least they can to get the most value. Sure. I buy cars— the amount
25:52.935 --> 25:54.983
of money we're talking about here isn't trivial. So it's not, it's not like I
25:55.483 --> 25:58.123
have a problem with that. I completely understand why people do that. We just have
25:58.524 --> 26:02.433
a way that we do business because of how deeply we believe in what
26:02.933 --> 26:06.583
we do. And I've had people say to me sometimes when they see me wearing,
26:06.855 --> 26:09.515
you know, a watch, be like, oh, I bet you got a deal on that.
26:09.563 --> 26:12.544
Yeah. And the thing about that is like, I don't ask for that, you know,
26:12.929 --> 26:15.110
it isn't to say that like there isn't a brand that we've worked with or
26:15.610 --> 26:17.388
somebody is going to be like, hey, I'll help. Like, if you want this,
26:17.404 --> 26:20.740
I'm going to proactively make you an offer as an industry courtesy. No, but you
26:20.804 --> 26:24.205
and I famously go watch shopping almost every day. And we pay retail.
26:24.301 --> 26:27.701
We pay retail. You and I went, we did some watch shopping. I bought a
26:28.201 --> 26:31.230
watch the other week. I bought a Tudor. You even paid a 3% credit card
26:31.730 --> 26:34.438
fee. And that's the thing. So I paid full price for the watch I bought
26:34.938 --> 26:37.310
from an authorized dealer, dealer we're friendly with and has,
26:37.630 --> 26:41.622
has helped us in a lot of ways. And when
26:41.655 --> 26:44.731
I'm buying the watch, like, you can pay by wire, or if you want to
26:44.779 --> 26:48.513
pay by credit card, there's a 3% credit card fee. And I was
26:48.609 --> 26:52.631
almost— because we don't charge a 3% credit card fee— I was almost like,
26:53.112 --> 26:56.109
you're really gonna make me do that? But then I remembered,
26:56.141 --> 26:59.346
like, look, this dealer, just like us,
26:59.362 --> 27:02.663
has been through a lot of painful economics in Alaska, and this is a relatively
27:03.163 --> 27:05.515
new policy. You don't have to buy from them, so it's your choice. It's my
27:06.015 --> 27:09.923
choice. But I know for a fact on a number of the lines
27:10.423 --> 27:14.058
that they carry, their margins have been squeezed because of tariffs.
27:14.122 --> 27:17.311
Now, of course, prices have increased too. But part of the reason we've
27:17.811 --> 27:21.382
talked about this, the, the part of the way the brands have
27:21.398 --> 27:24.812
figured out how they're going to work within tariffs has
27:24.844 --> 27:27.953
been in a lot of cases to squeeze dealers on their margins. Yep.
27:28.194 --> 27:31.575
So the money's got to come from somewhere. They have mouths to feed, they have
27:32.075 --> 27:36.430
a store, they have inventory they're carrying, all that sort of stuff. So not
27:36.930 --> 27:40.890
only did I pay retail, I paid above retail for
27:41.390 --> 27:44.810
a tutor. So I'm sure I'll be lambasted for that. I guess my point here
27:45.310 --> 27:48.710
though, but I stopped myself and I was like, you know what? I get why
27:49.210 --> 27:52.090
they're doing that and I get where they come from. It's given me more empathy
27:52.590 --> 27:55.570
and understanding. And I don't want this to be misinterpreted as virtue signaling because I
27:56.070 --> 27:58.610
don't mean it that way. It's just there are other things in life where I
27:59.110 --> 28:01.850
ask, I'm not paying retail for a car. There you go. But I guess my
28:02.350 --> 28:05.130
point is because you and I have a deeper level of empathy with that particular
28:05.630 --> 28:08.864
component, we're much more, we're much less We have much lower expectations when
28:09.364 --> 28:11.642
it comes to that sort of thing. Ironically, I think what we're saying is it's
28:12.142 --> 28:15.480
made us more willing to pay full retail on watches.
28:15.833 --> 28:19.463
Yes. Now pivoting over though to the, I think
28:19.527 --> 28:22.915
probably the more interesting side of it, you and I exist
28:23.415 --> 28:27.139
in a really unusual situation, which is because we chose
28:27.639 --> 28:31.330
to liquidate our collections along with so many other assets to fund this business,
28:32.133 --> 28:35.311
we found ourselves in an unusual position when we came, you know,
28:35.327 --> 28:38.567
when we came up for air. Yeah. Which is we
28:39.067 --> 28:42.223
now, we know a lot about watches. Well, can I ask you one question on
28:42.723 --> 28:45.414
the— let me just finish the thought though of collections though. Yeah, but hang on.
28:46.232 --> 28:49.391
We know a lot about watches, but we actually didn't have any, which is like
28:49.891 --> 28:52.501
an unusual situation. Before you go there though. Yeah. Before you go there,
28:53.464 --> 28:56.590
I can, I can answer this one easily. Sure. Is there anything— look,
28:57.617 --> 29:01.161
what a privileged position where we had watches we
29:01.661 --> 29:05.072
could sell. To help fund our business. Right. A lot of people have to make
29:05.489 --> 29:09.112
way too— to be clear, it was, it was to help fund.
29:09.240 --> 29:12.479
It did not fund. To help fund our business. And we
29:12.979 --> 29:15.108
did not— it was a lever we could pull. It was one lever we could
29:15.188 --> 29:18.378
pull. And a lot of people don't have that lever. Right. That's a,
29:18.539 --> 29:21.136
that's a, that's a blessing to have.
29:21.200 --> 29:24.486
Absolutely. I know the answer to this question for me before we go to
29:24.986 --> 29:28.528
coming up for air, because we did come up for air. Is Is there anything
29:29.218 --> 29:32.830
you sold that you really regret or that really just
29:32.991 --> 29:36.250
pains you? Oh, absolutely. I often can just sell a watch
29:36.442 --> 29:39.107
and move on and just get on with life. Oh, I can tell you the
29:39.607 --> 29:42.704
3 watches that I, that I regret losing. Oh, there's 3? There's 3 that I,
29:42.848 --> 29:45.144
I, I just, I, I miss all the time.
29:45.914 --> 29:48.595
And it is my white gold gray dial LM101.
29:49.125 --> 29:52.464
Yeah. I miss that watch all the time. Killer. It is
29:52.721 --> 29:56.141
our Urwerk collaboration. Yep, that watch meant so
29:56.270 --> 29:59.304
much to me on so many levels, and I loved it.
29:59.481 --> 30:03.110
Yeah, I still love it. I just don't have it. Yeah, and bizarrely,
30:03.190 --> 30:06.514
this may surprise you, but my A. Lange Söhne Odysseus.
30:07.429 --> 30:11.234
Really? Yeah, and, and I love— that was the day,
30:11.443 --> 30:14.606
and I, you know, I'm lucky to have A. Lange in my collection now.
30:15.120 --> 30:18.829
Yeah, as of relatively recently, but it's
30:19.329 --> 30:22.619
not an Odysseus. It's a beautiful watch. It's still a killer watch. Great watch.
30:22.844 --> 30:25.975
But, but that Odysseus— well, the Odysseus just
30:26.475 --> 30:30.536
felt like the, the Lange for me. Sure. And to its, to its credit,
30:30.552 --> 30:34.117
yes, it's in a derivative category, but it's not a derivative watch.
30:34.309 --> 30:38.436
Oh no, that watch was great. But I miss those watches profoundly.
30:38.500 --> 30:41.134
Now, do I miss them more than having Collective? No.
30:42.017 --> 30:45.791
But if I could, like, you know, just snap my fingers
30:46.291 --> 30:49.244
and get 3 pieces back— what if you could only have one of those 3
30:49.744 --> 30:52.644
back? The Your work. Yeah, same for me. I sold— I had to sell my
30:53.144 --> 30:56.332
Urwerk before as well. But, you know, like, I think I sold that for
30:57.102 --> 31:00.021
$54,000. That's a lot of capital.
31:00.165 --> 31:03.212
I did the same. And that was— that paid my salary for
31:03.712 --> 31:07.029
a long time. It kills me. Of every watch I sold,
31:07.462 --> 31:11.038
that's the one that really hurts on so many
31:11.054 --> 31:14.197
levels. In many ways, it's the collaboration we did that I'm the most
31:14.697 --> 31:18.670
proud of for many reasons. It's the nicest watch I've ever owned just
31:19.170 --> 31:21.443
from terms of like its monetary value. Yeah, but you also had like a right
31:21.491 --> 31:24.842
to have it in like a really like, you know, because sometimes with really expensive
31:24.858 --> 31:27.439
watches, at least for me, I can be like, do I feel comfortable wearing this?
31:27.519 --> 31:31.478
No, that I did. It wouldn't exist without us. But that one, that one really,
31:32.296 --> 31:35.630
really hurts. But when you zoom back out, here's the fun
31:35.742 --> 31:39.269
opportunity of it. We can now— the slate was wiped
31:39.285 --> 31:42.379
clean. Yeah. And if you think about it, like, I know collectors do this all
31:42.395 --> 31:45.665
the time, like as a thought experiment. What if I could reset my collection?
31:45.713 --> 31:48.872
Well, we did the table over. Yeah. And what's really interesting about the choices
31:48.904 --> 31:51.570
that like I've been making and I'm seeing you even make some of these too,
31:51.810 --> 31:54.958
is like we are at least now I
31:55.006 --> 31:58.153
feel like our collecting falls into— actually, I won't characterize yours.
31:58.297 --> 32:01.557
For mine, my collecting now falls into 2 buckets.
32:02.376 --> 32:05.731
One is 100% independent watch focused.
32:06.245 --> 32:09.505
Like what are the indies that I want, believe in, want to support?
32:09.858 --> 32:13.342
And like really like, you know, setting my sights and like picking those off,
32:13.455 --> 32:16.425
right? Yep. And that's why I have a Holthin Ricks in my collection now.
32:16.521 --> 32:18.817
Obviously, it's why I have Ming. It's why I have a Singer Dual Track.
32:18.945 --> 32:23.553
Oh, I love that watch. Yeah, you know, these are indies that like are watches
32:23.585 --> 32:26.941
that I have seen, immediately fell in love with, and just
32:27.441 --> 32:30.456
like went for. The other side of it is like I am being way more
32:30.633 --> 32:34.647
honest with myself now about what it is that I like and
32:34.727 --> 32:38.163
what I want to collect. And now that's why you're seeing— and that's a function
32:38.259 --> 32:41.003
of having reset things. Yes, that just to, you know,
32:41.163 --> 32:44.240
growing and evolving and maturing. Well, you know that I've gone
32:44.352 --> 32:48.101
through more watches than any of us can imagine. Your old saying
32:48.198 --> 32:51.579
about this is you buzz through all through butter like a chainsaw through butter.
32:51.627 --> 32:55.248
There you go. But, but, but I think as a result, I have
32:55.264 --> 32:59.014
gotten to a point where there are certain things that I know that
32:59.514 --> 33:02.619
I really like, certain eras of certain watchmakers I know I really like. You know
33:02.635 --> 33:06.449
I love neo-vintage Vacheron. Yeah, I love neo-vintage Breguet. I've even gotten you
33:06.545 --> 33:09.451
hooked on that. And these are the kinds of things where I'm like,
33:09.837 --> 33:13.178
that's what I'm looking for. And it's entirely driven now
33:14.414 --> 33:17.225
by what I like. And I think the measure for me is that the tenure
33:17.725 --> 33:21.465
of those watches in my collection is way longer. So you're— were you just taking
33:21.562 --> 33:24.614
flyers on watches before to check them out, or you didn't
33:24.630 --> 33:28.244
know what you liked, or were you somehow not honest with yourself
33:28.744 --> 33:31.295
in a way that you are now? Like, I'm trying to understand. All of the
33:31.795 --> 33:34.604
above. All of the above. I mean, like, how much time do you have?
33:34.668 --> 33:38.276
Yeah, look, Look, I, everyone collects in different ways and we set
33:38.776 --> 33:42.139
up these arbitrary rules for ourselves, right? Like if you sell a watch, you're a
33:42.187 --> 33:45.377
flipper. No, no, that's not what that is.
33:46.034 --> 33:49.159
You know, if you over-collect, you're wasteful. If you under-collect, you, you know, you're a
33:49.659 --> 33:53.070
tire kicker. Like there's all these different things that people
33:53.278 --> 33:56.997
assign to collecting, which is
33:57.013 --> 34:00.315
probably more a projection of, of the, of the person making that comment than it
34:00.815 --> 34:03.985
is an actual collector. Because the thing is, the collectors that I admire, they all
34:04.485 --> 34:07.824
have different behaviors in the way that they collect. But they all follow
34:07.841 --> 34:11.215
their heart. They do. And, and I think I'll give an example.
34:11.311 --> 34:14.300
You remember, like, when we were in Geneva and I bought the Breguet 3700BA,
34:14.911 --> 34:18.751
the Worldtimer, from the Davidoffs? That, that was not a monumentally
34:18.847 --> 34:22.141
expensive watch, but it wasn't cheap. No. And I made that decision relatively
34:22.641 --> 34:25.098
quickly inside the Davidoff store. I mean, how could you not with that watch?
34:25.210 --> 34:28.408
Sure. But my point, though, is, is that a watch that I would have bought
34:28.908 --> 34:31.780
5 to 7 years ago? Absolutely not. Not? Because I wouldn't have the balls to
34:32.280 --> 34:35.537
do it. So you went from telling me that you just sort of willy-nilly
34:35.569 --> 34:38.651
bought anything, and now you're more focused. No, I said all
34:38.716 --> 34:42.167
of the above, because different watches fell into different categories. And for me,
34:42.296 --> 34:45.812
I would have been— I would have been so focused 10 years ago on
34:46.326 --> 34:49.793
what's the residual value of this watch that I wouldn't have
34:50.293 --> 34:52.346
been able to pull the trigger on it, even though my heart would have told
34:52.846 --> 34:56.665
me aesthetically I love it. When I was in there, my mathematics
34:57.165 --> 35:01.305
were, can I afford this watch that I love? Yes, I'll take
35:01.805 --> 35:02.777
it? Got it. Not if I get home and I don't like it, how do
35:03.277 --> 35:06.352
I get out of it? And do you, so you think being in the industry
35:06.368 --> 35:09.494
has changed that mindset? Yes. And the reason why is that when
35:09.574 --> 35:12.459
I look at a lot of the senior people who have been in this business
35:12.959 --> 35:16.546
for a long time who collect, they got some weird stuff.
35:17.043 --> 35:20.297
They have weird stuff. They're deeply passionate about it, but it always is driven
35:20.393 --> 35:23.487
by what they like. Yeah. Not what the value is. Yes. You know, and I
35:23.615 --> 35:27.109
think that's, that, that is a, a maturity that I had aspired
35:27.609 --> 35:31.267
to. And I hadn't gotten there. And I'm, you know, I'm slowly getting
35:31.379 --> 35:34.349
there now. And as a result, my collection is way more interesting. Like, I opened
35:34.849 --> 35:38.025
my watch box today to pick something out. And like, the way my watch
35:38.057 --> 35:41.589
box looks today is so different than it looked 10 years ago.
35:42.392 --> 35:46.325
10 years ago was way more hypey. Hmm. You know, this year when
35:46.825 --> 35:49.102
I open my box, there's not— the only thing in there that's like remotely hypey
35:49.150 --> 35:51.991
at this point are like my kids' birth watches, which are GMT-Masters,
35:53.051 --> 35:56.101
you know? And I don't even know if my kids were to be born today,
35:56.117 --> 35:59.645
if those were the— if that's the watch I would have picked. Picked. So my
35:59.725 --> 36:03.186
point is, I find it really interesting. Why do you think you lost interest in
36:03.234 --> 36:07.305
the hypey stuff? Because I think the hypey stuff can sometimes be not very interesting.
36:08.298 --> 36:11.551
Like, I'll give you an example. We had a, we had a very, very,
36:11.583 --> 36:15.157
very famous sporty Patek come into the office on a trade
36:15.189 --> 36:18.843
this week. We did. This is a watch that has appreciated dramatically
36:18.939 --> 36:22.096
for the, the client who traded it. Aquanaut, is it
36:22.256 --> 36:25.768
not? Okay, there you So, but the point is, one of
36:26.268 --> 36:28.719
the folks in our office had never actually seen an Aquanaut. Yeah. And we handed
36:29.219 --> 36:31.992
it to them and the response was like, fine, I don't get it. It's fine.
36:33.130 --> 36:36.723
And I think it's cool to sort of see that because if you
36:36.900 --> 36:40.188
are completely— this person's like newer to watches, you know,
36:40.204 --> 36:43.509
switched industries to work here. Yeah. If they can look at
36:44.009 --> 36:46.877
it and be like, yeah, it seems like, well, it was the old,
36:46.941 --> 36:50.711
like the Pepsi challenge, right? Yeah. You know, like they didn't understand
36:51.211 --> 36:55.091
or know what the— what Patek Philippe really is, or what the Aquanaut is,
36:55.188 --> 36:58.317
or just evaluating it as a watch compared to all the other watches they see
36:58.817 --> 37:01.622
on a daily basis, which I would say are probably far more interesting. I used
37:02.122 --> 37:05.297
to own a 5167A. It's a great watch. I loved owning it. Like, it's— I'm
37:05.313 --> 37:09.003
not trying to throw shade on it. My point is, when removed
37:09.503 --> 37:12.983
from all of the collector context, it's not quite as interesting as
37:13.079 --> 37:16.128
other watches at a competitive price point, in my opinion. Yeah.
37:16.689 --> 37:19.996
And I think— or I think another way of saying it is like when you
37:20.496 --> 37:23.499
remove the hype from the picture and evaluate the watch on its merits, on its
37:23.612 --> 37:27.130
merits, it changes things 100%. So I think that's
37:27.630 --> 37:32.208
really interesting because if you do that and you go through the mental like gymnastics
37:32.708 --> 37:35.871
of it, it's like within the Patek line there are way more available,
37:36.208 --> 37:40.065
way more accessible, awesome Patek Philippes than what is quote-unquote
37:40.145 --> 37:43.535
desirable. But so often as a community we just
37:44.035 --> 37:47.545
don't approach it that way because because in fairness, on one hand, the cost is
37:48.045 --> 37:51.279
so high from an absolute standpoint that there is a financial component
37:51.311 --> 37:54.692
to that. You can't remove that because it's just a lot of money. And then
37:55.192 --> 37:58.457
there's the other side of it too, which is it's very difficult to look
37:58.505 --> 38:02.495
at something objectively when you exist in a community that is utterly subjective.
38:03.265 --> 38:05.892
So when we collect now,
38:06.373 --> 38:09.658
or at least when I collect now, and I try to look at something that
38:10.158 --> 38:14.098
I like, I really am just looking it on the merits
38:14.226 --> 38:18.235
and trying to decide if that's something I want to own, far— way
38:18.539 --> 38:21.602
less considering what it will say about me to
38:22.102 --> 38:25.370
somebody else, and way less considering what, you know,
38:25.851 --> 38:29.667
what its residual value or whatnot will be. I recognize
38:29.860 --> 38:33.772
one could say, okay, that sounds like a privileged position, but I think
38:33.868 --> 38:36.979
I would argue that that's true whether you're buying a $100,
38:37.155 --> 38:40.651
$500, $10,000, $100,000 watch depending on
38:41.151 --> 38:44.708
on what your budgets are. You know, like you are madly in love with that
38:45.208 --> 38:48.317
Citizen GMT you bought for $500. It's a cool watch.
38:48.445 --> 38:51.332
There you go. And like you bought that, did you buy that and even give
38:51.832 --> 38:54.861
a second thought to if you'd see that $500 again? No, I bought it because
38:54.877 --> 38:57.523
I really liked that watch. But if you went to the farmer's market, would you
38:58.023 --> 39:01.549
pause before spending $500? Sure. Right. So my point is like absolute
39:02.049 --> 39:05.366
sums vary dramatically based on context. Sure. Yeah.
39:05.446 --> 39:08.878
And if your drive, and if you're buying something because you fundamentally
39:09.071 --> 39:13.094
like it, which is a thing that I think watch collectors often say is
39:13.142 --> 39:16.989
what they do, but we struggle with the reality of that because of the absolute
39:17.489 --> 39:21.205
cost and because of community pressure. And I say this speaking myself,
39:22.038 --> 39:25.645
you know, if you remove that, it changes your collecting. Yeah. I think one
39:26.145 --> 39:29.219
of the interesting things I'm just thinking about for myself here
39:29.412 --> 39:32.473
when you say this is, man, these Facebook comments are going to
39:32.973 --> 39:36.240
be brutal. No, when, when we were purely enthusiasts and
39:36.320 --> 39:40.058
purely part of the watch community, the collector community,
39:40.732 --> 39:45.145
what we're mostly surrounded by and influenced
39:45.645 --> 39:48.836
by and just exposed to is what we see
39:49.336 --> 39:53.168
in watch media and then really the collector community itself, the things people
39:53.668 --> 39:57.052
are talking about in, in chats and in groups and
39:57.100 --> 40:00.165
in meetups. And, and this is no dig, it's just
40:00.665 --> 40:04.144
a reality. Like, people are social creatures, we take cues from each other, and that
40:04.160 --> 40:07.769
definitely puts wind in the sail, that creates
40:08.269 --> 40:10.864
a lot of the hype. You know, something gets shared in a group, that's currency
40:10.896 --> 40:13.734
in a group, the group likes it, it turns you on to it. You may
40:14.007 --> 40:17.423
genuinely love it, but you're being influenced by the group. And I don't mean that
40:17.695 --> 40:20.838
in a necessarily bad thing. We're just creatures of our environment.
40:21.384 --> 40:24.655
Our job now has forced us to go out into the wilds of watchmaking.
40:25.168 --> 40:28.889
Like, we're— we still love collecting, we still go to watch collecting events, we're still
40:28.937 --> 40:32.657
in groups. All of that stuff is true, but we're also forced
40:32.705 --> 40:36.019
by virtue of our own survival in this industry to
40:36.115 --> 40:39.673
go out and find the next thing, to meet with the new watchmaker, to look
40:40.173 --> 40:43.618
around the other corner, to try more watches, to have an open point
40:44.118 --> 40:47.511
of view, because it's necessary to our business and to our survival. I'm thinking,
40:47.768 --> 40:50.855
as I look at you, opened up the aperture for us, I think. Would you,
40:51.064 --> 40:53.573
would you have bought and worn that Caballero 5 years ago?
40:55.192 --> 40:59.209
I don't know. Yeah, I don't know. I'm wearing the Singer titanium
40:59.242 --> 41:02.622
Caballero with the cocoa brown dial, which is It's very
41:02.718 --> 41:06.779
you. It's very me, I think. So for me, what's, what's changed— I
41:06.811 --> 41:10.470
had the opportunity, like you said, to flip over the table and reset my collection,
41:10.598 --> 41:14.017
and it was definitely along 2 lines. One is I kind of rebuilt my collection.
41:14.274 --> 41:17.291
Yeah. So a lot of the watches I had to sell or move on from,
41:17.403 --> 41:20.757
I was able to acquire. Yeah. Again, fortunately,
41:21.752 --> 41:25.556
the privilege I enjoy being in the industry is I can
41:25.604 --> 41:28.830
be more picky about what I buy, and more things come my
41:29.038 --> 41:33.259
way, sort of opportunistically, so I can get
41:33.759 --> 41:37.083
better examples of things or whatever, really find— oh, that's true about the Seamaster
41:37.583 --> 41:40.617
300 Bond that I bought, which is a— which was actually my very first watch,
41:40.681 --> 41:44.054
except that one was quartz. Yes, one isn't. But to your point, this was a
41:44.134 --> 41:47.362
really good example that we saw before it went up for sale, so I snagged
41:47.862 --> 41:51.458
it. Yes. And the same thing is true for me. Like, I rebuilt my collection
41:51.958 --> 41:56.870
with a Seamaster 300, a vintage one from the '90s, a vintage Speedmaster,
41:57.400 --> 42:01.495
neo-vintage Rolex stuff that I really like, and rebuilt
42:01.995 --> 42:05.683
my collection really around like neo-vintage tool watches is what I really like.
42:05.731 --> 42:08.844
And so I rebuilt that collection. Yeah. And then
42:09.502 --> 42:13.593
I explored the world of independents. But even in independents,
42:13.609 --> 42:17.493
if I think about the last few watches I bought, like this Singer
42:18.006 --> 42:22.082
Heritage— or sorry, the Singer Caballero Titanium— or the
42:22.098 --> 42:25.532
Ming Uni, oh yeah, those are very kind of like tactical watches.
42:25.628 --> 42:30.169
Oh yeah, totally. So I've been able in the world of independents
42:30.669 --> 42:34.078
to gain exposure to and appreciate all that there is in independent watchmaking, and then
42:34.143 --> 42:37.589
within that world find the things that really meet my brief or meet,
42:38.054 --> 42:41.372
you know, really appeal to what I'm, what I'm attracted to.
42:41.436 --> 42:45.300
Now, the thing I thought you were gonna say about how
42:45.428 --> 42:48.137
has this changed your collecting was to say, well,
42:49.227 --> 42:52.641
it's really changed my collecting because I own half of the watches at
42:52.657 --> 42:56.408
Collective, or I own half of every watch in the safe at Collective,
42:56.424 --> 42:59.711
which is also true. And I, I do— sure, no, no,
42:59.727 --> 43:02.456
you can't wear them. No, no, no, no. But I don't think you need to
43:02.584 --> 43:06.278
wear something to collect it. You know, I— one of my favorite
43:06.778 --> 43:10.003
watches I own is a watch I almost never wear, which is like a
43:10.503 --> 43:13.905
1977 Seiko Turtle. I never wear it, but I love
43:14.405 --> 43:17.197
it. It will never go anywhere. I cherish that thing. I just— I love it
43:17.697 --> 43:21.533
as an object. And I feel that way about the watches in
43:22.033 --> 43:24.584
our safe, which is, of course, you and I aren't gonna wear them. They're gonna,
43:25.162 --> 43:27.571
you know, be delivered to someone as a new watch one day.
43:27.635 --> 43:31.048
But like I do view them in a sense as something of
43:31.096 --> 43:34.926
a collection because we buy stuff we believe in. See, I don't, I don't think
43:35.426 --> 43:39.012
about that as part of my collection, but I do recognize like the opportunity
43:39.044 --> 43:42.153
it provides us, which is we get— literally view it as part of my collection,
43:42.169 --> 43:46.046
but I view it as a form of a different kind of form of collecting.
43:46.383 --> 43:50.613
Sure. Which is where we're buying and literally investing in and acquiring
43:50.725 --> 43:54.058
watches that we believe in and excite us. A lot of dealers,
43:54.170 --> 43:56.939
mainstream watch dealers, don't pick their inventory.
43:57.293 --> 44:00.432
The truck shows up every week and unloads whatever came
44:00.932 --> 44:04.281
in from Omega or Rolex or whatever, and it's like you just have this— like,
44:05.333 --> 44:08.325
you know, like you're a goose being force-fed,
44:08.746 --> 44:12.479
you know, stuffed rotten. Eat the sub.
44:14.236 --> 44:17.655
But for us, what's different about the world of independent watchmaking
44:17.768 --> 44:21.600
is we are intentional with our orders. We don't— it's not just like the
44:21.665 --> 44:24.245
brand is like, you buy package of watch and it shows up and here it
44:24.261 --> 44:27.369
is and you sell it. No, we choose what we want.
44:27.433 --> 44:30.855
We choose what we— we choose the brands we work with. Yeah, we choose
44:30.887 --> 44:34.374
what— and we choose what we believe in. And so to me,
44:34.647 --> 44:38.406
everything in our safe is an extension of
44:38.422 --> 44:41.073
you and me and our point of view and what we believe in and who
44:41.154 --> 44:44.833
we want to support and the watches that fundamentally get us excited,
44:45.491 --> 44:48.849
the same way kind of collecting is. Now, we're custodians
44:48.946 --> 44:52.063
of them, we're, we're promoters of them,
44:52.239 --> 44:55.659
we're retailing them, But there is a level
44:56.172 --> 45:00.231
of personal investment, of course, in there that's
45:00.343 --> 45:03.696
similar to collecting. Yeah. Look, in the end,
45:04.594 --> 45:08.508
I wondered if by doing this when we started it 8 years ago
45:08.621 --> 45:12.022
that I would get bored of watches or numb to them.
45:12.936 --> 45:16.321
And instead what I found is quite the opposite.
45:17.043 --> 45:20.380
But instead of the way that I acted as a consumer, which was is
45:20.957 --> 45:24.792
highly acquisition-driven. I still am, I'm still buying
45:24.889 --> 45:28.403
watches and I'm still buying them like probably more than the average person does.
45:29.382 --> 45:33.313
But what I'm buying and the cadence
45:33.813 --> 45:37.437
of it is way, way, way more refined and way more about
45:37.937 --> 45:41.256
me, which I think is interesting because I've had people say to me like,
45:41.336 --> 45:44.160
well, if you're going to buy that watch, like, could you, you know, if you,
45:44.240 --> 45:47.032
hey man, that's cool, Longa, but like, are you really going to wear that?
45:47.129 --> 45:50.305
Because you only sell into And the answer to that to me is
45:50.337 --> 45:54.250
like, well, yeah, of course I will, because my passion for
45:54.330 --> 45:58.564
independent watches doesn't exist in a void from my love of watchmaking.
45:58.932 --> 46:02.637
Do I want to be in business with Lange? Probably not. No shade,
46:02.685 --> 46:04.770
but like, it's a giant holding company. I don't know if I want to do
46:05.270 --> 46:08.779
that. The watches are phenomenal, but why
46:09.279 --> 46:13.478
should that prevent me as a business owner from owning something
46:13.670 --> 46:16.689
as an individual? Jewel. And as a result, same thing with Breguet. I mean,
46:16.721 --> 46:19.209
like, you know, we're not going to— I'm sure the Swatch Group has a picture
46:19.709 --> 46:23.224
of me up on a dartboard, you know, but like chestnut, it's probably
46:23.724 --> 46:27.382
true. Maybe at a shooting range. But my point is that doesn't stop me from,
46:27.543 --> 46:30.738
from loving neo-vintage Breguet or giving them credit where credit is
46:30.834 --> 46:34.479
due on some of those new stuff. Yeah. Which like someone woke
46:34.527 --> 46:38.172
the sleeping giant up over there. That's awesome. So I
46:38.220 --> 46:42.170
guess my point is Being in this business hasn't
46:42.670 --> 46:45.976
changed how much I love watches. It has changed how I acquire watches, and it
46:45.992 --> 46:48.641
has increased the tenure for which I keep watches.
46:49.316 --> 46:52.559
Because if I'm buying them for the reasons I'm buying them for now,
46:53.506 --> 46:57.007
I'm more inclined to keep them for longer periods of time. Yeah.
46:57.408 --> 47:00.860
On a related note, one of the questions I get all the time,
47:00.892 --> 47:03.542
and it actually came up, it was a question we got from a listener,
47:03.590 --> 47:05.388
was like, well, do you just buy independents now?
47:06.400 --> 47:09.710
And the answer is obviously no. I buy,
47:09.886 --> 47:13.790
I buy independents and more mainstream watches. I just love watches. I buy what I
47:14.290 --> 47:17.742
love. And I would expect the same of our, of our clients.
47:17.887 --> 47:21.597
They, most of them just love watches. There are very few who self-identify
47:22.097 --> 47:25.437
purely as an independent collector. There, they are out there for sure, and,
47:25.935 --> 47:30.642
and bless those, bless those people. But retailing
47:30.754 --> 47:35.070
independent watches has actually given us a level of independence,
47:35.086 --> 47:38.116
not just in the way we collect, but in everything we do around our business.
47:38.437 --> 47:41.514
Yes. That I think people might not expect.
47:41.643 --> 47:45.185
Now, if you are retailing mainstream watch brands
47:45.685 --> 47:49.594
from the big holding companies, you don't have a ton of independence
47:49.658 --> 47:52.190
in the way— forget you're collecting for a second— in the way you run your
47:52.238 --> 47:55.685
business, the way you dress, the way you, the way you dress, the way that
47:56.185 --> 47:59.660
you buckle a watch on someone's wrist, which watch, which brand sits next to which
47:59.773 --> 48:03.732
brand in your display, what you can say publicly, your cologne
48:03.780 --> 48:06.893
in some cases. Yeah. All this stuff is highly controlled,
48:06.909 --> 48:10.633
and they sign agreements with these companies that give
48:10.745 --> 48:14.982
them tons of control over the retailer, what— every
48:15.079 --> 48:18.433
aspect of how they, of how they do business. They're very
48:18.529 --> 48:22.141
tightly controlled and very limited in what they can do, and they probably can't
48:22.157 --> 48:25.672
and shouldn't be wearing, say, like an independent watch. They may not be permitted to.
48:25.784 --> 48:29.187
It may not be permitted to. We, because we carry independent watches
48:29.219 --> 48:32.670
and independent watch brands, These are, you know, it's like the independents are
48:33.170 --> 48:36.620
this rogues' gallery of characters and geniuses and,
48:37.150 --> 48:41.084
and, you know, tortured people and all this stuff. And the
48:41.180 --> 48:44.215
people who are in independent watchmaking are doing it because they love it and they
48:44.715 --> 48:48.261
have a passion around watchmaking and creativity and art and all of this sort
48:48.761 --> 48:52.356
of stuff. And they don't make us sign crazy agreements and gag
48:52.404 --> 48:57.170
orders. And so we have a level of flexibility
48:58.036 --> 49:00.793
that few people in the watch industry really enjoy.
49:01.947 --> 49:05.008
Even in the media, you know, when we talked to Stephen Pulverin years ago
49:05.508 --> 49:08.984
about like, well, why does the media not— why aren't they more critical of watch
49:09.016 --> 49:12.029
brands? And one of the things he pointed out, among many things, was,
49:12.221 --> 49:15.780
well, it's about access to some extent. Sure. You need to be very careful about
49:15.828 --> 49:19.435
what you say, because if you go out on a limb and say
49:19.451 --> 49:22.576
something really negative, you may lose access to that brand. You know,
49:22.640 --> 49:25.942
that brand could be Patek or Rolex. And if you lose access to
49:26.006 --> 49:28.938
them, you're cooked as a journalist or a media entity.
49:29.515 --> 49:32.864
We don't have that problem. So, you know, in some ways,
49:33.280 --> 49:36.790
being in the business of independent watches has
49:36.838 --> 49:41.421
afforded us an independence with our collection. I can collect mainstream
49:41.469 --> 49:45.491
watches and I have the total freedom to do it. And so for,
49:45.555 --> 49:49.705
for that, I'm grateful. It's a— it's another reason to love independent
49:49.785 --> 49:53.124
watchmaking. Making. Shall we leave it there? I guess we'll leave it there.
49:53.317 --> 49:56.528
Well, thank you for listening. This, of course, is Open Work. It's a
49:57.028 --> 50:00.366
production of Collective Horology. You can find us online at
50:00.462 --> 50:04.621
collectivehorology.com, where you'll find all of those independent watches.
50:05.038 --> 50:08.121
And to get in touch, please send us an email, send us
50:08.186 --> 50:11.397
questions. We had questions on today's episode— see, we really
50:11.461 --> 50:14.705
do use them— ideas for show topics, all that stuff.
50:14.769 --> 50:17.187
We love it. And to do that, you can email podcast@collectivehorology.com.
50:28.723 --> 50:31.450
New releases from, uh, and some other releases from,