1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,200
Today on the Bourbon Bytes Podcast, Bulleit drops a massive 20 year old rye,
2
00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:11,340
we have an official Dragon Con Bourbon, and Nintendo finally brings Star Fox to the Switch 2,
3
00:00:11,580 --> 00:00:16,680
then I have a byte-sized review of the new Maker's Mark Star Hill Farm 2026.
4
00:00:28,990 --> 00:00:34,170
Hello everyone and welcome to the Bourbon Bytes Podcast, I'm your host Clifton,
5
00:00:34,170 --> 00:00:42,250
and this is the week of July 2nd, 2026. We are now in the full swing of summer,
6
00:00:42,670 --> 00:00:48,110
I know the July 4th weekend is coming up, and hopefully you all are going to have a fantastic
7
00:00:48,110 --> 00:00:53,290
long weekend. We don't do anything too crazy here, there's a local park that shoots off
8
00:00:53,290 --> 00:00:58,150
fireworks that we can walk to, so we'll probably walk down there and enjoy the show, maybe have a
9
00:00:58,150 --> 00:01:03,650
to-go cup of bourbon on the way. But not only is it getting warm, the whiskey drops are getting
10
00:01:03,650 --> 00:01:09,170
hotter this year, so get yourself a glass poured, or a coffee, depending on when you're listening to
11
00:01:09,170 --> 00:01:14,930
this, and let's get into the hottest topics of the week. The first of which was announced last week,
12
00:01:15,050 --> 00:01:22,510
and this is the oldest rye ever from Bulleit. So this is limited to just 1776 bottles,
13
00:01:22,730 --> 00:01:30,310
obviously to honor the nation's 250th anniversary, and it's made up of their 95/5 mash bill. Now I'm
14
00:01:30,310 --> 00:01:36,550
excited because I love Indiana rye whiskey. Now what's interesting is this was aged in Kentucky,
15
00:01:36,550 --> 00:01:41,390
but distilled in Indiana, so it's going to have a lot of the effects of the Kentucky heat on it,
16
00:01:41,810 --> 00:01:46,950
but of course that delicious Indiana rye that we've come to know and love. Now what's crazy
17
00:01:46,950 --> 00:01:53,710
interesting is this is also going to be released at Cask Strength, and it's going to be 137 proof,
18
00:01:53,850 --> 00:01:58,630
so nearly hazmat rye whiskey. Now of course it's going to be hard to get your hands on a bottle,
19
00:01:58,630 --> 00:02:03,530
retail on it's going to be about $300, but I think it's incredible to see such a highly
20
00:02:03,530 --> 00:02:09,289
aged rye whiskey at a massive proof. You know with Bulleit I feel like a lot of times they'll
21
00:02:09,289 --> 00:02:14,230
release high age stuff but lower proof, or vice versa, high proof stuff and lower age.
22
00:02:14,530 --> 00:02:19,050
So seeing them come out with this special release gets me really excited. I hope it becomes a trend
23
00:02:19,050 --> 00:02:25,290
to continue to release older rye whiskeys. I'm a big fan of Bulleit 12-year rye, so I don't know
24
00:02:25,290 --> 00:02:29,530
if I'll get my hands on this with there being such limited allocation of it, but knowing how
25
00:02:29,530 --> 00:02:35,450
much I love Indiana rye, I've never had it quite that old. I think I've had 13 years, 6 months is
26
00:02:35,450 --> 00:02:41,370
the oldest Indiana rye I've had, but that was incredible. I think that was 120 proof, so I can
27
00:02:41,370 --> 00:02:47,630
only imagine this is going to be pretty darn great at 20 years old. It also could be over-oaked,
28
00:02:47,670 --> 00:02:52,270
you never know. I mean again, rye whiskey is such an interesting category. The only time I've had
29
00:02:52,270 --> 00:02:56,690
older rye whiskey than that is Canadian whiskey, but that's such a different category. I don't
30
00:02:56,690 --> 00:03:02,270
think it really exemplifies what an Indiana rye could taste like at that age. So if you have a
31
00:03:02,270 --> 00:03:06,710
chance to try this, let me know. Do you think it's over-oaked or do you think it's just right? I
32
00:03:06,710 --> 00:03:12,890
would love to hear your thoughts. Now in direct contrast to this $300 Bulleit, Redwood Empire is
33
00:03:12,890 --> 00:03:21,070
releasing a budget bottle for just $39.99. This is a four grain expression that marries their
34
00:03:21,070 --> 00:03:26,770
Northern California grain to glass spirit with four to 14 year old high wheat bourbons from both
35
00:03:26,770 --> 00:03:32,290
Kentucky and Indiana. And they're calling this the Colonel Armstrong Wheated Bourbon. So even though
36
00:03:32,290 --> 00:03:37,110
it's a four grain, it is going to be considered a wheated bourbon. The mash bill is 59% corn,
37
00:03:37,230 --> 00:03:43,850
30% wheat, 6% rye, and 5% malted barley. And it's going to come in at $90 for proof. Now this is a
38
00:03:43,850 --> 00:03:50,210
small barrel blend or relatively small, 122 barrels went into this. And yeah, I think it's great to see
39
00:03:50,210 --> 00:03:54,530
Redwood Empire release coming in at a really good price point. Definitely one I'm going to keep an
40
00:03:54,530 --> 00:03:59,150
eye out for. I don't expect it to impress me like some of their high-end stuff, but love to see it.
41
00:03:59,770 --> 00:04:03,670
Now, another one that caught my eye just because of the whole nerdom of this podcast,
42
00:04:04,210 --> 00:04:10,250
Dragon Con, which is one of the largest multimedia pop culture conventions in the United States.
43
00:04:10,450 --> 00:04:15,950
They've actually just announced their Dragon Con bourbon, and this is their second annual release
44
00:04:15,950 --> 00:04:21,730
of this. And I had no idea that Dragon Con Spirits even existed. It's a collaboration with Atlanta
45
00:04:21,730 --> 00:04:27,670
based Old Fourth Distillery and Dragon Con's co-founders to celebrate the convention's 40th
46
00:04:27,670 --> 00:04:33,050
anniversary. It's a limited edition high rye bourbon, and it's aged between four to six years old
47
00:04:33,050 --> 00:04:40,290
and bottled at 94 proof. Interestingly enough, this is also priced at $40, same price as that new
48
00:04:40,290 --> 00:04:45,430
Redwood Empire release. But I didn't know this was a thing. I love to see nerd culture come together
49
00:04:45,430 --> 00:04:50,950
and make cool spirits. Now they've also previously released a vodka. They actually have a mead,
50
00:04:51,070 --> 00:04:57,010
which is really cool. But yeah, this is a bourbon. Now looking at the source, this is MGP bourbon,
51
00:04:57,130 --> 00:05:01,010
so they're very straightforward with that, but it has been aged in Atlanta. So it looks like you can
52
00:05:01,010 --> 00:05:05,870
get your bottles of this at Dragon Con coming up later this year in about two months. It's in
53
00:05:05,870 --> 00:05:10,430
beginning of September and they'll offer bottle engraving. So if anyone's going to that, let me
54
00:05:10,430 --> 00:05:14,090
know. I wish I could make it to Atlanta. I mean, there's always such fun conventions happening
55
00:05:14,090 --> 00:05:19,250
there. Being on the West Coast, it's a little bit harder, but really, really cool. I'm hoping to
56
00:05:19,250 --> 00:05:24,830
see more fun, nerdy collaborations like that. Now Father's Day was just last weekend, but there are
57
00:05:24,830 --> 00:05:29,030
two new spirits that I'm reading about that I imagine were probably released for the occasion.
58
00:05:29,470 --> 00:05:34,510
So the first of which is from Sweetens Cove and they're releasing their Father's Finish bourbon.
59
00:05:34,850 --> 00:05:41,170
Not sure about that name, but it is a $70 bourbon. It says it is a blend of aged bourbons,
60
00:05:41,170 --> 00:05:47,990
incorporating a magnetic removable ball marker in their unique cork design. So I had to do a
61
00:05:47,990 --> 00:05:51,970
double take. I didn't know what they meant by that, but I assume it's to do with golfing. That
62
00:05:51,970 --> 00:05:56,430
kind of is the theme here with Sweetens Cove. They've done quite a bit of new releases lately
63
00:05:56,430 --> 00:06:00,330
to kind of distance themselves from their first releases. They have a six-year-old bourbon. They
64
00:06:00,330 --> 00:06:04,310
have a five-year-old Tennessee bourbon. This one doesn't have an age statement, but is a blend of
65
00:06:04,310 --> 00:06:10,310
Kentucky and Tennessee whiskeys, and it is finished in cuvee wine barrels. It's going to be released
66
00:06:10,310 --> 00:06:14,830
at 98 proof. But yeah, I think it was a Father's Day release, but it is still available to the
67
00:06:14,830 --> 00:06:18,870
public. So if you're looking for a special gift for a father or dad figure in your life,
68
00:06:19,210 --> 00:06:24,050
maybe consider giving them a Father's Finish. All right. Well, before I get into my byte-sized
69
00:06:24,050 --> 00:06:29,770
review, I do want to mention a new video game release that has people talking. So this is the
70
00:06:29,770 --> 00:06:36,490
new release of Star Fox for Nintendo Switch 2. So, you know, all the big flashy things about a
71
00:06:36,490 --> 00:06:42,090
Star Fox game were a little bit misleading. Technically, it's a remake of Star Fox 64,
72
00:06:42,430 --> 00:06:48,210
but it's been updated with all of the latest graphics and mechanics of a modern game. But if
73
00:06:48,210 --> 00:06:54,110
you look at it, it actually is a truly faithful-looking edition of this game. Personally,
74
00:06:54,190 --> 00:06:58,790
I've only played a little bit of Star Fox 64. I was a big fan of the Super Nintendo game when I was
75
00:06:58,790 --> 00:07:04,570
little. So I'm really excited about this re-release. People say they've really nailed the nostalgic
76
00:07:04,570 --> 00:07:08,770
element of Star Fox. They didn't over-complicate it. The controls are pretty similar based on what
77
00:07:08,770 --> 00:07:14,190
I've seen on gameplay footage, and people are hopeful that this can signal an era of new,
78
00:07:14,470 --> 00:07:19,450
modern Star Fox games. It's an amazing IP. Like I said, I love the brand. I love the characters.
79
00:07:19,830 --> 00:07:23,390
I love the voices of the characters. So when I saw this coming out, I thought it was going to
80
00:07:23,390 --> 00:07:28,690
be a new story, but hearing that it's kind of just a rehash of Star Fox 64, it's a little bit
81
00:07:28,690 --> 00:07:33,030
disappointing. But again, people are hopeful that this is going to reignite an interest in
82
00:07:33,030 --> 00:07:39,610
the franchise and maybe lead to future Star Fox games. I would 100% be here for it. I'll probably
83
00:07:39,610 --> 00:07:43,710
pick this up if it goes on sale. Like I said, I'm not in a huge rush to play this. I can always
84
00:07:43,710 --> 00:07:48,290
play the classic ones if I need to. But I did want to talk about it since this just came out.
85
00:07:48,410 --> 00:07:52,830
I think it was either last week or early this week, but people are definitely talking about it.
86
00:07:53,290 --> 00:07:58,070
Well, I know this is a very loose tie, but our byte-sized review also has to do with
87
00:07:58,070 --> 00:08:10,790
the stars. So let's get into it. All right. Well, like I said, it's a loose connection,
88
00:08:11,030 --> 00:08:17,730
but I'm reviewing the new Star Hill Farm from Maker's Mark. Now, this is the 2026 release.
89
00:08:17,890 --> 00:08:23,210
I didn't have a chance to try the 2025, but I heard good things about it. It's actually
90
00:08:23,210 --> 00:08:28,610
their first new mash bill that they've ever released at Maker's Mark. Of course, talking
91
00:08:28,610 --> 00:08:34,650
about last year's, but this is the first new whiskey from the brand in 70 years. It's actually
92
00:08:34,650 --> 00:08:39,250
their first wheat whiskey because Maker's Mark is a wheated bourbon, but it's still a bourbon.
93
00:08:39,370 --> 00:08:45,450
It's still more corn. This has more wheat in the mash bill than corn. Actually, it's 27% wheat,
94
00:08:45,630 --> 00:08:51,750
62% malted wheat, and 11% malted barley. So there's no corn in here at all. And they say
95
00:08:51,750 --> 00:08:56,990
the goal of Star Hill Farm whiskey is to celebrate the role regenerative agriculture plays to create
96
00:08:56,990 --> 00:09:02,030
healthier soil and better flavor. So each of these, they partner with local farmers to show
97
00:09:02,030 --> 00:09:07,710
the nuances and influence of land in whiskey making. Now, last year, this became the first
98
00:09:07,710 --> 00:09:13,370
whiskey to earn an estate whiskey certification. And this one continues that tradition with the
99
00:09:13,370 --> 00:09:18,530
Estate Whiskey Alliance. This is established by the University of Kentucky to highlight local
100
00:09:18,530 --> 00:09:24,050
sourcing and sustainable production and recognize whiskey producers entirely on the distillery
101
00:09:24,050 --> 00:09:30,590
estate using grains grown on a state owned or controlled land. So again, I'm a huge fan of this.
102
00:09:30,750 --> 00:09:36,190
I love estate grown whiskey or estate distilled products. Even small farmers just trying their
103
00:09:36,190 --> 00:09:41,410
distillate to me is so, so special. So when Maker's Mark first announced this, I was really excited to
104
00:09:41,410 --> 00:09:47,690
get my hands on it. By the way, this one comes in at 116.4 proof. It comes in a 700 milliliter bottle
105
00:09:47,690 --> 00:09:54,030
and the price was about $120. So up there for a Maker's Mark product for sure. Now I will note
106
00:09:54,030 --> 00:09:58,070
there's not an age statement on this whiskey, but they do tell you that the grains were harvested,
107
00:09:58,310 --> 00:10:04,090
distilled and barreled in both fall of 2017 and fall of 2018. So I would guess this whiskey is
108
00:10:04,090 --> 00:10:08,190
between six and eight years old. But again, no age statement here. I think that's an interesting
109
00:10:08,190 --> 00:10:12,130
choice, especially for a high end bottle. You would think they would have an age statement on
110
00:10:12,130 --> 00:10:16,430
it, but they give you a little bit of info here, like I said. So let's go ahead and get this whiskey
111
00:10:16,430 --> 00:10:22,390
poured and see how it is. By the way, if you are new to the podcast or channel, I typically do love
112
00:10:22,390 --> 00:10:28,290
high-end Maker's Mark products. I always used to say that the only Maker's Mark I don't like is the
113
00:10:28,290 --> 00:10:33,490
regular Maker's Mark, but everything from the 46 to the Cask Strengths to the Private Selects to
114
00:10:33,490 --> 00:10:38,550
the Wood Finishing Series, I've been a fan of. So this being my first new addition to the Maker's
115
00:10:38,550 --> 00:10:42,770
Mark lineup in a couple of years, I'm pretty excited. Let's go ahead and give it a nose and
116
00:10:42,770 --> 00:10:49,030
see what's going on. Oh, interesting. There's like a sweet effervescence that's kind of happening
117
00:10:49,030 --> 00:10:52,950
here. It kind of reminds me of when you just pour a soda and you're getting a little bit of that
118
00:10:52,950 --> 00:10:58,270
tingly on the nose as you're, you know, pouring it into your mouth. I'm getting a little bit of
119
00:10:58,270 --> 00:11:04,230
cola notes here, along with a lot of sweetness. It's a lot sweeter than most colas are. Definitely
120
00:11:04,230 --> 00:11:10,710
some like vanilla creaminess on the nose, maybe a touch of cherry, but it's like a tart cherry
121
00:11:10,710 --> 00:11:14,870
versus like a sweeter maraschino or luxardo cherry. You're getting a little bit of that
122
00:11:14,870 --> 00:11:20,010
wheat grain note that you get on some, you know, smaller or craft wheated bourbons and wheat
123
00:11:20,010 --> 00:11:25,810
whiskeys. Not like barnyardy in some ways, like some of these do. It definitely is more like a
124
00:11:25,810 --> 00:11:30,650
traditional whiskey nose. Honestly, it smells pretty similar to some Maker's Mark I've had
125
00:11:30,650 --> 00:11:35,510
before. Not getting too much oak here. Again, we don't know the age on it, but I'm hoping to see
126
00:11:35,510 --> 00:11:39,750
a little bit more complexity on the palate because the nose is sweet. It's nice, but
127
00:11:39,750 --> 00:11:44,270
nothing too crazy. So let's see how it does on the taste. Cheers.
128
00:11:47,170 --> 00:11:52,950
Okay. Not crazy different from the nose, honestly. It's still very sweet, but it's an interesting
129
00:11:52,950 --> 00:11:57,170
sweetness. It's not like, you know, I said vanilla on the nose, but it was more of the creamy aspect.
130
00:11:57,390 --> 00:12:02,470
This isn't like a vanilla or caramel. Honestly, it's kind of still like that powdered sugar kind
131
00:12:02,470 --> 00:12:07,810
of note, but almost has a bit of a burnt sugar kind of element. Like you burn a dessert a little
132
00:12:07,810 --> 00:12:13,210
bit around the edges, or even this is a weirdly specific note, but it's like you have a creme
133
00:12:13,210 --> 00:12:18,210
brulee, but you only eat the top part. So that, uh, solidified sugar that's been charred with like
134
00:12:18,210 --> 00:12:22,770
the blow torch or whatever. If you're just eating that and not the custard below, that's kind of the
135
00:12:22,770 --> 00:12:27,930
flavor profile happening here. It's bright. It's sweet. Um, not as fruity as it was on the nose,
136
00:12:27,990 --> 00:12:34,170
but it's very, very deserty on the palate. Let me get a second sip here. Yeah. I mean,
137
00:12:34,170 --> 00:12:39,590
you have to dig deep to find anything beyond that sweetness. I didn't expect this to be so sweet.
138
00:12:39,810 --> 00:12:44,290
You know, Maker's Mark to me, it's a little sweet, but I usually get that from the finishes, right?
139
00:12:44,310 --> 00:12:48,930
Like the French Oak with the 46 brings a different element of spice and sweetness that regular Maker's
140
00:12:48,930 --> 00:12:55,270
Mark doesn't have. This one is really, really sweet. So I'm wondering if the corn and like
141
00:12:55,270 --> 00:13:00,870
Maker's Mark really is bringing more depth to it because this, while it tastes good, um, really
142
00:13:00,870 --> 00:13:05,690
leaves a lot to be desired in terms of complexity here. And I know with the wheat whiskey, that's a
143
00:13:05,690 --> 00:13:10,470
little bit harder to find, but that being said, I mean, one of my favorite whiskeys this year so far
144
00:13:10,470 --> 00:13:15,350
was the Bernheim 10 year old wheat whiskey. Now that's a little bit older than this price was
145
00:13:15,350 --> 00:13:19,890
actually a little bit cheaper than this, but to me, that one has so much complexity and depth to
146
00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:24,770
it that I've never really experienced on a wheat whiskey. So maybe I've kind of set my expectations
147
00:13:24,770 --> 00:13:29,450
so high because of that really great release earlier this year, but this is kind of reminding
148
00:13:29,450 --> 00:13:34,010
me of what I normally expect from wheat whiskeys, you know, a little bit of a simpler flavor profile,
149
00:13:34,210 --> 00:13:40,290
not spicy at all. Honestly, this does not drink the 116.4 proof. I'd probably guess it's between
150
00:13:40,290 --> 00:13:46,050
105 to 110 if I was guessing. Um, but honestly, that's not a bad thing. It's just the lack of
151
00:13:46,050 --> 00:13:52,370
depth and character beyond just the initial sweet, you know, bright, um, approachable flavor.
152
00:13:52,510 --> 00:13:57,150
There's really not much more beyond that. There's a hint of citrus on the back end towards the finish,
153
00:13:57,150 --> 00:14:01,990
but the finish is short to medium. It's not crazy long like some other Maker's Mark releases are.
154
00:14:02,450 --> 00:14:06,690
And I really wish I could get some of that Oak note. And I'm wondering again, because
155
00:14:06,690 --> 00:14:11,490
there's a chance this is younger whiskey. So there's a chance that is impacting it as well.
156
00:14:11,610 --> 00:14:15,490
And now it's time to get into my byte-sized review, which I keep it short and sweet here.
157
00:14:15,730 --> 00:14:20,510
I just give it a score out of 10 that considers all things like availability, price, proof,
158
00:14:20,510 --> 00:14:27,110
palate, nose, everything all considered. So for this year's Star Hill Farm American wheat whiskey,
159
00:14:27,410 --> 00:14:32,210
I think it's a great idea. I love that Maker's Mark is expanding beyond the traditional mash
160
00:14:32,210 --> 00:14:36,090
bill. I love that they're trying something new. I like that. They're putting a different label on
161
00:14:36,090 --> 00:14:39,450
it to not confuse people that are fans of maker's mark. I think that's actually a really good
162
00:14:39,450 --> 00:14:46,490
marketing move, but that being said, this to me does not drink like a $100 to a $120 whiskey.
163
00:14:46,490 --> 00:14:51,470
Honestly, if this were priced between $50 and $60, I would have a much more favorable opinion on it.
164
00:14:51,770 --> 00:14:58,450
So with all that into consideration, I'm going to give this one a six and a half out of 10
165
00:14:58,450 --> 00:15:03,210
because I like it. It's not a bad whiskey at all. I would gladly drink a pour of it.
166
00:15:03,470 --> 00:15:07,930
I don't think I would buy a second bottle of it, especially at $120. I think honestly,
167
00:15:08,350 --> 00:15:13,010
you know, if it was retail of $120, I would probably rank this closer to a six, but because
168
00:15:13,010 --> 00:15:17,110
I did overpay a little bit, that's more on me. So it's a hundred. I think it's, you know,
169
00:15:17,210 --> 00:15:21,550
that's still up there in price. So I'll give it a 6.5. It's not something I'm going to be
170
00:15:21,550 --> 00:15:27,030
reaching for another bottle of, but it's definitely a fun one to showcase what, um,
171
00:15:27,050 --> 00:15:32,310
you know, estate grown whiskey can be. Um, so seeing sustainable farming and, um, other people
172
00:15:32,310 --> 00:15:37,410
doing sustainable barrel sourcing is incredible. So I want to encourage them to keep it up. That's
173
00:15:37,410 --> 00:15:41,750
why I'll give it a 6.5, but I've heard that last year's release was maybe a little bit better.
174
00:15:41,750 --> 00:15:47,330
So if I have a chance to try a 2025, I'll definitely give that a comparison, but yeah,
175
00:15:47,390 --> 00:15:52,170
for me, this one, it was fine. I don't regret picking it up. I do regret paying what I did,
176
00:15:52,410 --> 00:15:57,110
but yeah, that's just my honest Byte-Sized review for you guys. Now, feel free to disagree with me.
177
00:15:57,230 --> 00:16:01,470
This might be your favorite whiskey of the year. If so, let me know in the comments on the YouTube
178
00:16:01,470 --> 00:16:06,250
video of this podcast, or you can join our discord server. You can go to bourbonbytes.com
179
00:16:06,250 --> 00:16:10,510
and click the link to the bourbon bytes discord server there. Everyone's welcome. We share the
180
00:16:10,510 --> 00:16:15,150
news stories there automatically as well as have cool discussions about what we've picked up
181
00:16:15,150 --> 00:16:19,550
lately. So if you have thoughts on this bottle beyond, uh, what I've said, please leave a
182
00:16:19,550 --> 00:16:24,090
comment. Let me know what you think, but that does it for this week's episode. I feel like I
183
00:16:24,090 --> 00:16:28,150
went a little fast, so apologies if this is a little shorter than normal. I just had a lot to
184
00:16:28,150 --> 00:16:33,110
get through and I was really excited to try this whiskey, so a little bummed, but I'm glad I tried
185
00:16:33,110 --> 00:16:37,170
it. I might not seek out another bottle for next year, unless maybe they bring in an age statement
186
00:16:37,170 --> 00:16:41,370
or people just are raving about it. So I'm curious to hear what you think. I actually see a
187
00:16:41,370 --> 00:16:45,670
few whiskeytubers reviewed it. So I'm going to watch those right after this podcast. Um, I think
188
00:16:45,670 --> 00:16:50,330
Jason from the Mash & Drum just uploaded literally a couple hours ago. So I wanted to make sure not
189
00:16:50,330 --> 00:16:54,370
to watch that before it, cause I didn't want to shape my opinion. So you guys go watch Jason's
190
00:16:54,370 --> 00:17:00,490
video as well. He's an amazing whiskeytuber on the internet. So cheers until next time. This has
191
00:17:00,490 --> 00:17:05,390
been the Bourbon Bytes podcast, a whiskey podcast with a gaming twist. I'll talk to you guys next
192
00:17:05,390 --> 00:17:07,410
episode. Cheers and game on.
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,200
Today on the Bourbon Bytes Podcast, Bulleit drops a massive 20 year old rye,
2
00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:11,340
we have an official Dragon Con Bourbon, and Nintendo finally brings Star Fox to the Switch 2,
3
00:00:11,580 --> 00:00:16,680
then I have a byte-sized review of the new Maker's Mark Star Hill Farm 2026.
4
00:00:28,990 --> 00:00:34,170
Hello everyone and welcome to the Bourbon Bytes Podcast, I'm your host Clifton,
5
00:00:34,170 --> 00:00:42,250
and this is the week of July 2nd, 2026. We are now in the full swing of summer,
6
00:00:42,670 --> 00:00:48,110
I know the July 4th weekend is coming up, and hopefully you all are going to have a fantastic
7
00:00:48,110 --> 00:00:53,290
long weekend. We don't do anything too crazy here, there's a local park that shoots off
8
00:00:53,290 --> 00:00:58,150
fireworks that we can walk to, so we'll probably walk down there and enjoy the show, maybe have a
9
00:00:58,150 --> 00:01:03,650
to-go cup of bourbon on the way. But not only is it getting warm, the whiskey drops are getting
10
00:01:03,650 --> 00:01:09,170
hotter this year, so get yourself a glass poured, or a coffee, depending on when you're listening to
11
00:01:09,170 --> 00:01:14,930
this, and let's get into the hottest topics of the week. The first of which was announced last week,
12
00:01:15,050 --> 00:01:22,510
and this is the oldest rye ever from Bulleit. So this is limited to just 1776 bottles,
13
00:01:22,730 --> 00:01:30,310
obviously to honor the nation's 250th anniversary, and it's made up of their 95/5 mash bill. Now I'm
14
00:01:30,310 --> 00:01:36,550
excited because I love Indiana rye whiskey. Now what's interesting is this was aged in Kentucky,
15
00:01:36,550 --> 00:01:41,390
but distilled in Indiana, so it's going to have a lot of the effects of the Kentucky heat on it,
16
00:01:41,810 --> 00:01:46,950
but of course that delicious Indiana rye that we've come to know and love. Now what's crazy
17
00:01:46,950 --> 00:01:53,710
interesting is this is also going to be released at Cask Strength, and it's going to be 137 proof,
18
00:01:53,850 --> 00:01:58,630
so nearly hazmat rye whiskey. Now of course it's going to be hard to get your hands on a bottle,
19
00:01:58,630 --> 00:02:03,530
retail on it's going to be about $300, but I think it's incredible to see such a highly
20
00:02:03,530 --> 00:02:09,289
aged rye whiskey at a massive proof. You know with Bulleit I feel like a lot of times they'll
21
00:02:09,289 --> 00:02:14,230
release high age stuff but lower proof, or vice versa, high proof stuff and lower age.
22
00:02:14,530 --> 00:02:19,050
So seeing them come out with this special release gets me really excited. I hope it becomes a trend
23
00:02:19,050 --> 00:02:25,290
to continue to release older rye whiskeys. I'm a big fan of Bulleit 12-year rye, so I don't know
24
00:02:25,290 --> 00:02:29,530
if I'll get my hands on this with there being such limited allocation of it, but knowing how
25
00:02:29,530 --> 00:02:35,450
much I love Indiana rye, I've never had it quite that old. I think I've had 13 years, 6 months is
26
00:02:35,450 --> 00:02:41,370
the oldest Indiana rye I've had, but that was incredible. I think that was 120 proof, so I can
27
00:02:41,370 --> 00:02:47,630
only imagine this is going to be pretty darn great at 20 years old. It also could be over-oaked,
28
00:02:47,670 --> 00:02:52,270
you never know. I mean again, rye whiskey is such an interesting category. The only time I've had
29
00:02:52,270 --> 00:02:56,690
older rye whiskey than that is Canadian whiskey, but that's such a different category. I don't
30
00:02:56,690 --> 00:03:02,270
think it really exemplifies what an Indiana rye could taste like at that age. So if you have a
31
00:03:02,270 --> 00:03:06,710
chance to try this, let me know. Do you think it's over-oaked or do you think it's just right? I
32
00:03:06,710 --> 00:03:12,890
would love to hear your thoughts. Now in direct contrast to this $300 Bulleit, Redwood Empire is
33
00:03:12,890 --> 00:03:21,070
releasing a budget bottle for just $39.99. This is a four grain expression that marries their
34
00:03:21,070 --> 00:03:26,770
Northern California grain to glass spirit with four to 14 year old high wheat bourbons from both
35
00:03:26,770 --> 00:03:32,290
Kentucky and Indiana. And they're calling this the Colonel Armstrong Wheated Bourbon. So even though
36
00:03:32,290 --> 00:03:37,110
it's a four grain, it is going to be considered a wheated bourbon. The mash bill is 59% corn,
37
00:03:37,230 --> 00:03:43,850
30% wheat, 6% rye, and 5% malted barley. And it's going to come in at $90 for proof. Now this is a
38
00:03:43,850 --> 00:03:50,210
small barrel blend or relatively small, 122 barrels went into this. And yeah, I think it's great to see
39
00:03:50,210 --> 00:03:54,530
Redwood Empire release coming in at a really good price point. Definitely one I'm going to keep an
40
00:03:54,530 --> 00:03:59,150
eye out for. I don't expect it to impress me like some of their high-end stuff, but love to see it.
41
00:03:59,770 --> 00:04:03,670
Now, another one that caught my eye just because of the whole nerdom of this podcast,
42
00:04:04,210 --> 00:04:10,250
Dragon Con, which is one of the largest multimedia pop culture conventions in the United States.
43
00:04:10,450 --> 00:04:15,950
They've actually just announced their Dragon Con bourbon, and this is their second annual release
44
00:04:15,950 --> 00:04:21,730
of this. And I had no idea that Dragon Con Spirits even existed. It's a collaboration with Atlanta
45
00:04:21,730 --> 00:04:27,670
based Old Fourth Distillery and Dragon Con's co-founders to celebrate the convention's 40th
46
00:04:27,670 --> 00:04:33,050
anniversary. It's a limited edition high rye bourbon, and it's aged between four to six years old
47
00:04:33,050 --> 00:04:40,290
and bottled at 94 proof. Interestingly enough, this is also priced at $40, same price as that new
48
00:04:40,290 --> 00:04:45,430
Redwood Empire release. But I didn't know this was a thing. I love to see nerd culture come together
49
00:04:45,430 --> 00:04:50,950
and make cool spirits. Now they've also previously released a vodka. They actually have a mead,
50
00:04:51,070 --> 00:04:57,010
which is really cool. But yeah, this is a bourbon. Now looking at the source, this is MGP bourbon,
51
00:04:57,130 --> 00:05:01,010
so they're very straightforward with that, but it has been aged in Atlanta. So it looks like you can
52
00:05:01,010 --> 00:05:05,870
get your bottles of this at Dragon Con coming up later this year in about two months. It's in
53
00:05:05,870 --> 00:05:10,430
beginning of September and they'll offer bottle engraving. So if anyone's going to that, let me
54
00:05:10,430 --> 00:05:14,090
know. I wish I could make it to Atlanta. I mean, there's always such fun conventions happening
55
00:05:14,090 --> 00:05:19,250
there. Being on the West Coast, it's a little bit harder, but really, really cool. I'm hoping to
56
00:05:19,250 --> 00:05:24,830
see more fun, nerdy collaborations like that. Now Father's Day was just last weekend, but there are
57
00:05:24,830 --> 00:05:29,030
two new spirits that I'm reading about that I imagine were probably released for the occasion.
58
00:05:29,470 --> 00:05:34,510
So the first of which is from Sweetens Cove and they're releasing their Father's Finish bourbon.
59
00:05:34,850 --> 00:05:41,170
Not sure about that name, but it is a $70 bourbon. It says it is a blend of aged bourbons,
60
00:05:41,170 --> 00:05:47,990
incorporating a magnetic removable ball marker in their unique cork design. So I had to do a
61
00:05:47,990 --> 00:05:51,970
double take. I didn't know what they meant by that, but I assume it's to do with golfing. That
62
00:05:51,970 --> 00:05:56,430
kind of is the theme here with Sweetens Cove. They've done quite a bit of new releases lately
63
00:05:56,430 --> 00:06:00,330
to kind of distance themselves from their first releases. They have a six-year-old bourbon. They
64
00:06:00,330 --> 00:06:04,310
have a five-year-old Tennessee bourbon. This one doesn't have an age statement, but is a blend of
65
00:06:04,310 --> 00:06:10,310
Kentucky and Tennessee whiskeys, and it is finished in cuvee wine barrels. It's going to be released
66
00:06:10,310 --> 00:06:14,830
at 98 proof. But yeah, I think it was a Father's Day release, but it is still available to the
67
00:06:14,830 --> 00:06:18,870
public. So if you're looking for a special gift for a father or dad figure in your life,
68
00:06:19,210 --> 00:06:24,050
maybe consider giving them a Father's Finish. All right. Well, before I get into my byte-sized
69
00:06:24,050 --> 00:06:29,770
review, I do want to mention a new video game release that has people talking. So this is the
70
00:06:29,770 --> 00:06:36,490
new release of Star Fox for Nintendo Switch 2. So, you know, all the big flashy things about a
71
00:06:36,490 --> 00:06:42,090
Star Fox game were a little bit misleading. Technically, it's a remake of Star Fox 64,
72
00:06:42,430 --> 00:06:48,210
but it's been updated with all of the latest graphics and mechanics of a modern game. But if
73
00:06:48,210 --> 00:06:54,110
you look at it, it actually is a truly faithful-looking edition of this game. Personally,
74
00:06:54,190 --> 00:06:58,790
I've only played a little bit of Star Fox 64. I was a big fan of the Super Nintendo game when I was
75
00:06:58,790 --> 00:07:04,570
little. So I'm really excited about this re-release. People say they've really nailed the nostalgic
76
00:07:04,570 --> 00:07:08,770
element of Star Fox. They didn't over-complicate it. The controls are pretty similar based on what
77
00:07:08,770 --> 00:07:14,190
I've seen on gameplay footage, and people are hopeful that this can signal an era of new,
78
00:07:14,470 --> 00:07:19,450
modern Star Fox games. It's an amazing IP. Like I said, I love the brand. I love the characters.
79
00:07:19,830 --> 00:07:23,390
I love the voices of the characters. So when I saw this coming out, I thought it was going to
80
00:07:23,390 --> 00:07:28,690
be a new story, but hearing that it's kind of just a rehash of Star Fox 64, it's a little bit
81
00:07:28,690 --> 00:07:33,030
disappointing. But again, people are hopeful that this is going to reignite an interest in
82
00:07:33,030 --> 00:07:39,610
the franchise and maybe lead to future Star Fox games. I would 100% be here for it. I'll probably
83
00:07:39,610 --> 00:07:43,710
pick this up if it goes on sale. Like I said, I'm not in a huge rush to play this. I can always
84
00:07:43,710 --> 00:07:48,290
play the classic ones if I need to. But I did want to talk about it since this just came out.
85
00:07:48,410 --> 00:07:52,830
I think it was either last week or early this week, but people are definitely talking about it.
86
00:07:53,290 --> 00:07:58,070
Well, I know this is a very loose tie, but our byte-sized review also has to do with
87
00:07:58,070 --> 00:08:10,790
the stars. So let's get into it. All right. Well, like I said, it's a loose connection,
88
00:08:11,030 --> 00:08:17,730
but I'm reviewing the new Star Hill Farm from Maker's Mark. Now, this is the 2026 release.
89
00:08:17,890 --> 00:08:23,210
I didn't have a chance to try the 2025, but I heard good things about it. It's actually
90
00:08:23,210 --> 00:08:28,610
their first new mash bill that they've ever released at Maker's Mark. Of course, talking
91
00:08:28,610 --> 00:08:34,650
about last year's, but this is the first new whiskey from the brand in 70 years. It's actually
92
00:08:34,650 --> 00:08:39,250
their first wheat whiskey because Maker's Mark is a wheated bourbon, but it's still a bourbon.
93
00:08:39,370 --> 00:08:45,450
It's still more corn. This has more wheat in the mash bill than corn. Actually, it's 27% wheat,
94
00:08:45,630 --> 00:08:51,750
62% malted wheat, and 11% malted barley. So there's no corn in here at all. And they say
95
00:08:51,750 --> 00:08:56,990
the goal of Star Hill Farm whiskey is to celebrate the role regenerative agriculture plays to create
96
00:08:56,990 --> 00:09:02,030
healthier soil and better flavor. So each of these, they partner with local farmers to show
97
00:09:02,030 --> 00:09:07,710
the nuances and influence of land in whiskey making. Now, last year, this became the first
98
00:09:07,710 --> 00:09:13,370
whiskey to earn an estate whiskey certification. And this one continues that tradition with the
99
00:09:13,370 --> 00:09:18,530
Estate Whiskey Alliance. This is established by the University of Kentucky to highlight local
100
00:09:18,530 --> 00:09:24,050
sourcing and sustainable production and recognize whiskey producers entirely on the distillery
101
00:09:24,050 --> 00:09:30,590
estate using grains grown on a state owned or controlled land. So again, I'm a huge fan of this.
102
00:09:30,750 --> 00:09:36,190
I love estate grown whiskey or estate distilled products. Even small farmers just trying their
103
00:09:36,190 --> 00:09:41,410
distillate to me is so, so special. So when Maker's Mark first announced this, I was really excited to
104
00:09:41,410 --> 00:09:47,690
get my hands on it. By the way, this one comes in at 116.4 proof. It comes in a 700 milliliter bottle
105
00:09:47,690 --> 00:09:54,030
and the price was about $120. So up there for a Maker's Mark product for sure. Now I will note
106
00:09:54,030 --> 00:09:58,070
there's not an age statement on this whiskey, but they do tell you that the grains were harvested,
107
00:09:58,310 --> 00:10:04,090
distilled and barreled in both fall of 2017 and fall of 2018. So I would guess this whiskey is
108
00:10:04,090 --> 00:10:08,190
between six and eight years old. But again, no age statement here. I think that's an interesting
109
00:10:08,190 --> 00:10:12,130
choice, especially for a high end bottle. You would think they would have an age statement on
110
00:10:12,130 --> 00:10:16,430
it, but they give you a little bit of info here, like I said. So let's go ahead and get this whiskey
111
00:10:16,430 --> 00:10:22,390
poured and see how it is. By the way, if you are new to the podcast or channel, I typically do love
112
00:10:22,390 --> 00:10:28,290
high-end Maker's Mark products. I always used to say that the only Maker's Mark I don't like is the
113
00:10:28,290 --> 00:10:33,490
regular Maker's Mark, but everything from the 46 to the Cask Strengths to the Private Selects to
114
00:10:33,490 --> 00:10:38,550
the Wood Finishing Series, I've been a fan of. So this being my first new addition to the Maker's
115
00:10:38,550 --> 00:10:42,770
Mark lineup in a couple of years, I'm pretty excited. Let's go ahead and give it a nose and
116
00:10:42,770 --> 00:10:49,030
see what's going on. Oh, interesting. There's like a sweet effervescence that's kind of happening
117
00:10:49,030 --> 00:10:52,950
here. It kind of reminds me of when you just pour a soda and you're getting a little bit of that
118
00:10:52,950 --> 00:10:58,270
tingly on the nose as you're, you know, pouring it into your mouth. I'm getting a little bit of
119
00:10:58,270 --> 00:11:04,230
cola notes here, along with a lot of sweetness. It's a lot sweeter than most colas are. Definitely
120
00:11:04,230 --> 00:11:10,710
some like vanilla creaminess on the nose, maybe a touch of cherry, but it's like a tart cherry
121
00:11:10,710 --> 00:11:14,870
versus like a sweeter maraschino or luxardo cherry. You're getting a little bit of that
122
00:11:14,870 --> 00:11:20,010
wheat grain note that you get on some, you know, smaller or craft wheated bourbons and wheat
123
00:11:20,010 --> 00:11:25,810
whiskeys. Not like barnyardy in some ways, like some of these do. It definitely is more like a
124
00:11:25,810 --> 00:11:30,650
traditional whiskey nose. Honestly, it smells pretty similar to some Maker's Mark I've had
125
00:11:30,650 --> 00:11:35,510
before. Not getting too much oak here. Again, we don't know the age on it, but I'm hoping to see
126
00:11:35,510 --> 00:11:39,750
a little bit more complexity on the palate because the nose is sweet. It's nice, but
127
00:11:39,750 --> 00:11:44,270
nothing too crazy. So let's see how it does on the taste. Cheers.
128
00:11:47,170 --> 00:11:52,950
Okay. Not crazy different from the nose, honestly. It's still very sweet, but it's an interesting
129
00:11:52,950 --> 00:11:57,170
sweetness. It's not like, you know, I said vanilla on the nose, but it was more of the creamy aspect.
130
00:11:57,390 --> 00:12:02,470
This isn't like a vanilla or caramel. Honestly, it's kind of still like that powdered sugar kind
131
00:12:02,470 --> 00:12:07,810
of note, but almost has a bit of a burnt sugar kind of element. Like you burn a dessert a little
132
00:12:07,810 --> 00:12:13,210
bit around the edges, or even this is a weirdly specific note, but it's like you have a creme
133
00:12:13,210 --> 00:12:18,210
brulee, but you only eat the top part. So that, uh, solidified sugar that's been charred with like
134
00:12:18,210 --> 00:12:22,770
the blow torch or whatever. If you're just eating that and not the custard below, that's kind of the
135
00:12:22,770 --> 00:12:27,930
flavor profile happening here. It's bright. It's sweet. Um, not as fruity as it was on the nose,
136
00:12:27,990 --> 00:12:34,170
but it's very, very deserty on the palate. Let me get a second sip here. Yeah. I mean,
137
00:12:34,170 --> 00:12:39,590
you have to dig deep to find anything beyond that sweetness. I didn't expect this to be so sweet.
138
00:12:39,810 --> 00:12:44,290
You know, Maker's Mark to me, it's a little sweet, but I usually get that from the finishes, right?
139
00:12:44,310 --> 00:12:48,930
Like the French Oak with the 46 brings a different element of spice and sweetness that regular Maker's
140
00:12:48,930 --> 00:12:55,270
Mark doesn't have. This one is really, really sweet. So I'm wondering if the corn and like
141
00:12:55,270 --> 00:13:00,870
Maker's Mark really is bringing more depth to it because this, while it tastes good, um, really
142
00:13:00,870 --> 00:13:05,690
leaves a lot to be desired in terms of complexity here. And I know with the wheat whiskey, that's a
143
00:13:05,690 --> 00:13:10,470
little bit harder to find, but that being said, I mean, one of my favorite whiskeys this year so far
144
00:13:10,470 --> 00:13:15,350
was the Bernheim 10 year old wheat whiskey. Now that's a little bit older than this price was
145
00:13:15,350 --> 00:13:19,890
actually a little bit cheaper than this, but to me, that one has so much complexity and depth to
146
00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:24,770
it that I've never really experienced on a wheat whiskey. So maybe I've kind of set my expectations
147
00:13:24,770 --> 00:13:29,450
so high because of that really great release earlier this year, but this is kind of reminding
148
00:13:29,450 --> 00:13:34,010
me of what I normally expect from wheat whiskeys, you know, a little bit of a simpler flavor profile,
149
00:13:34,210 --> 00:13:40,290
not spicy at all. Honestly, this does not drink the 116.4 proof. I'd probably guess it's between
150
00:13:40,290 --> 00:13:46,050
105 to 110 if I was guessing. Um, but honestly, that's not a bad thing. It's just the lack of
151
00:13:46,050 --> 00:13:52,370
depth and character beyond just the initial sweet, you know, bright, um, approachable flavor.
152
00:13:52,510 --> 00:13:57,150
There's really not much more beyond that. There's a hint of citrus on the back end towards the finish,
153
00:13:57,150 --> 00:14:01,990
but the finish is short to medium. It's not crazy long like some other Maker's Mark releases are.
154
00:14:02,450 --> 00:14:06,690
And I really wish I could get some of that Oak note. And I'm wondering again, because
155
00:14:06,690 --> 00:14:11,490
there's a chance this is younger whiskey. So there's a chance that is impacting it as well.
156
00:14:11,610 --> 00:14:15,490
And now it's time to get into my byte-sized review, which I keep it short and sweet here.
157
00:14:15,730 --> 00:14:20,510
I just give it a score out of 10 that considers all things like availability, price, proof,
158
00:14:20,510 --> 00:14:27,110
palate, nose, everything all considered. So for this year's Star Hill Farm American wheat whiskey,
159
00:14:27,410 --> 00:14:32,210
I think it's a great idea. I love that Maker's Mark is expanding beyond the traditional mash
160
00:14:32,210 --> 00:14:36,090
bill. I love that they're trying something new. I like that. They're putting a different label on
161
00:14:36,090 --> 00:14:39,450
it to not confuse people that are fans of maker's mark. I think that's actually a really good
162
00:14:39,450 --> 00:14:46,490
marketing move, but that being said, this to me does not drink like a $100 to a $120 whiskey.
163
00:14:46,490 --> 00:14:51,470
Honestly, if this were priced between $50 and $60, I would have a much more favorable opinion on it.
164
00:14:51,770 --> 00:14:58,450
So with all that into consideration, I'm going to give this one a six and a half out of 10
165
00:14:58,450 --> 00:15:03,210
because I like it. It's not a bad whiskey at all. I would gladly drink a pour of it.
166
00:15:03,470 --> 00:15:07,930
I don't think I would buy a second bottle of it, especially at $120. I think honestly,
167
00:15:08,350 --> 00:15:13,010
you know, if it was retail of $120, I would probably rank this closer to a six, but because
168
00:15:13,010 --> 00:15:17,110
I did overpay a little bit, that's more on me. So it's a hundred. I think it's, you know,
169
00:15:17,210 --> 00:15:21,550
that's still up there in price. So I'll give it a 6.5. It's not something I'm going to be
170
00:15:21,550 --> 00:15:27,030
reaching for another bottle of, but it's definitely a fun one to showcase what, um,
171
00:15:27,050 --> 00:15:32,310
you know, estate grown whiskey can be. Um, so seeing sustainable farming and, um, other people
172
00:15:32,310 --> 00:15:37,410
doing sustainable barrel sourcing is incredible. So I want to encourage them to keep it up. That's
173
00:15:37,410 --> 00:15:41,750
why I'll give it a 6.5, but I've heard that last year's release was maybe a little bit better.
174
00:15:41,750 --> 00:15:47,330
So if I have a chance to try a 2025, I'll definitely give that a comparison, but yeah,
175
00:15:47,390 --> 00:15:52,170
for me, this one, it was fine. I don't regret picking it up. I do regret paying what I did,
176
00:15:52,410 --> 00:15:57,110
but yeah, that's just my honest Byte-Sized review for you guys. Now, feel free to disagree with me.
177
00:15:57,230 --> 00:16:01,470
This might be your favorite whiskey of the year. If so, let me know in the comments on the YouTube
178
00:16:01,470 --> 00:16:06,250
video of this podcast, or you can join our discord server. You can go to bourbonbytes.com
179
00:16:06,250 --> 00:16:10,510
and click the link to the bourbon bytes discord server there. Everyone's welcome. We share the
180
00:16:10,510 --> 00:16:15,150
news stories there automatically as well as have cool discussions about what we've picked up
181
00:16:15,150 --> 00:16:19,550
lately. So if you have thoughts on this bottle beyond, uh, what I've said, please leave a
182
00:16:19,550 --> 00:16:24,090
comment. Let me know what you think, but that does it for this week's episode. I feel like I
183
00:16:24,090 --> 00:16:28,150
went a little fast, so apologies if this is a little shorter than normal. I just had a lot to
184
00:16:28,150 --> 00:16:33,110
get through and I was really excited to try this whiskey, so a little bummed, but I'm glad I tried
185
00:16:33,110 --> 00:16:37,170
it. I might not seek out another bottle for next year, unless maybe they bring in an age statement
186
00:16:37,170 --> 00:16:41,370
or people just are raving about it. So I'm curious to hear what you think. I actually see a
187
00:16:41,370 --> 00:16:45,670
few whiskeytubers reviewed it. So I'm going to watch those right after this podcast. Um, I think
188
00:16:45,670 --> 00:16:50,330
Jason from the Mash & Drum just uploaded literally a couple hours ago. So I wanted to make sure not
189
00:16:50,330 --> 00:16:54,370
to watch that before it, cause I didn't want to shape my opinion. So you guys go watch Jason's
190
00:16:54,370 --> 00:17:00,490
video as well. He's an amazing whiskeytuber on the internet. So cheers until next time. This has
191
00:17:00,490 --> 00:17:05,390
been the Bourbon Bytes podcast, a whiskey podcast with a gaming twist. I'll talk to you guys next
192
00:17:05,390 --> 00:17:07,410
episode. Cheers and game on.
