#486: September 27, 2020 的完整文字稿

00:04:32 Speaker 1: No, he's great. 00:04:32 Speaker 4: Okay. 00:04:33 Speaker 3: He's very good. It's a relief. 00:04:34 Speaker 1: No, it's all right. 00:04:35 Speaker 3: So, Jordan, today, speaking of monsters, we're going to be talking about the September 27th, 2020 episode of The Alex Jones Show. I'm Dan. This is Alex Jones. God damn it. Wait, 2020? I fucked up. 00:04:46 Speaker 1: Did you say, God damn it's Alex Jones? 00:04:48 Speaker 4: Yep. 00:04:51 Speaker 3: Anyway, it's an interesting time. And what I wanted to do for this episode was talk about anything except Alex Jones. However, the present day required that we discuss things because... Why? 00:05:02 Speaker 1: Did anything new happen? Yeah. 00:05:03 Speaker 3: At the end of last week, Trump announced his pick for the Supreme Court, which was, of course, Amy Coney Barrett. That's great. And I thought that we needed to find out what Alex's response to this was because... Immediately when Ginsburg passed away, Alex said that the inside scoop was that Coney Barrett was the choice. 00:05:25 Speaker 2: Totally. 00:05:25 Speaker 3: She was the choice, and Alex was excited about this. 00:05:28 Speaker 1: Of course. 00:05:28 Speaker 3: Then he started to talk to Robert Barnes, his former lawyer and noted weirdo, and Barnes... Was coming in with some real hot mess talk about Barrett. 00:05:40 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:05:40 Speaker 3: Saying that she was going to let the Pope decide the Supreme Court. 00:05:43 Speaker 2: Yep. 00:05:44 Speaker 3: They decided that she was the worst pick possible. Of course. She was basically an authoritarian weirdo. You got it. And that Barbara Lagoa was the choice that Trump should make. Sure. Barnes pitched Lagoa as somebody who would give him basically a win in Florida. Right. Was a perfect choice. very conservative doesn't have a lot of the baggage that barrett may have. 00:06:06 Speaker 1: Do you mean like being in a cult well they wouldn't. 00:06:09 Speaker 3: Put it that way surprise uh you might uh as a former cult member and that's your prerogative it's a little bit there um and so you know they were really anti barrett in the days prior to barrett's nomination yeah uh they were really pushing for lagoa and uh boy yeah they accidentally tapped into the reality of evangelical christians which is that they hate catholics somehow this is getting lost in in all of this. 00:06:38 Speaker 1: Rah-rah how dare you criticize catholicism shan't be analyzed by alex so we will leave it aside for now But one thing I thought was really interesting was like, OK, so that announcement came. 00:06:51 Speaker 3: And so Saturday, Alex, usually whenever there's big news, we'll have a Saturday episode. 00:06:56 Speaker 1: He didn't have a Saturday episode. 00:06:57 Speaker 3: So we had to wait until Sunday. So we're recording this fairly late. And so we could see what his Sunday reaction would be to the announcement of Trump. Trump nominating somebody that he and his buddy Barnes, who he respects greatly and is a great constitutional lawyer. The two of them have almost daily been talking about how it would be a huge mistake to nominate Barrett. 00:07:22 Speaker 1: She sucks. 00:07:23 Speaker 3: She's a choice of the Federalist Society and they're a bunch of monsters on the right. So I was really curious. How is this going to play? It seems like now that Barrett is the choice, it seems like That's going to be tough to justify. So we're going to see how it goes. 00:07:40 Speaker 1: I think you're wrong. 00:07:41 Speaker 3: Well, I think they might have to stoop to some levels that you might not expect. Okay. 00:07:48 Speaker 2: That's sad. 00:07:48 Speaker 3: I was curious to see how it was going to play out, and that's why we are doing this episode kind of late. 00:07:53 Speaker 2: Sure, sure. 00:07:53 Speaker 3: A little down to the wire, but I think it may be worth it. Let's do it. So before we get down to business on that, Jordan, let's take a little moment to say thank you to some folks who have signed up and are supporting the show. 00:08:04 Speaker 1: Oh, that's great. 00:08:05 Speaker 3: So first, Paschetti Western. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. 00:08:08 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:08:10 Speaker 1: Thanks, Paschetti. 00:08:11 Speaker 3: Thank you. Nick Sawyer. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. 00:08:14 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:08:14 Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Sawyer. 00:08:16 Speaker 3: I hope it's not the character from Lost who I don't like. 00:08:18 Speaker 1: No, it's got to be him. 00:08:19 Speaker 3: I told you about him today. I don't like Sawyer. 00:08:22 Speaker 1: Yes, you have. But I think we were drunk one night and you made me watch the first episode of Lost. And the whole time you fucking shit all over the show you love. 00:08:34 Speaker 3: Well, I don't like a number of characters on it. A lot of the characters suck. 00:08:39 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:08:40 Speaker 3: The Sawyer among them. But this Sawyer donated to the show. He's not a fictional character. He's wonderful. So thank you very much. Next, Andy J. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. 00:08:48 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:08:49 Speaker 1: Thank you, Andy. 00:08:50 Speaker 3: Thank you. Next, George Soros, Antifa Slush Fund. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. 00:08:54 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:08:55 Speaker 1: Thank you very much, GSASF. 00:08:59 Speaker 3: Yep, you got it. 00:09:00 Speaker 2: Yep. 00:09:00 Speaker 3: Next, Kmart. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. 00:09:02 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:09:04 Speaker 3: I assure you, it is not the Kmart. This is not sponsored by Kmart. 00:09:10 Speaker 1: That would be a surprising move for an ad agency. It's just like, here's our trick. We've got one show where they will call out your name no matter fucking what. 00:09:21 Speaker 3: And that's cut right for an ad. If this were Kmart, that would be

genius. 00:09:27 Speaker 1: We have discovered a real problem here. I think this is called arbitrage. 00:09:32 Speaker 3: There are so many problems with the way that we do this. This is the stupidest thing in the world. 00:09:37 Speaker 1: We are not good. 00:09:38 Speaker 3: No. We're operating as if we're a podcast where no one's listening. 00:09:42 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:09:42 Speaker 3: Because we are still thinking that's the case, because that was the case. 00:09:48 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah. 00:09:48 Speaker 3: Of course. And we kind of updated how we do this. Why would we? Oh, God. 00:09:52 Speaker 1: It's a ma and pa kind of old-fashioned store. We've been doing it this way since 1974. Causes me a lot of headaches. 00:09:58 Speaker 3: Yeah. So thanks, Kmart. Yes, thank you. Next, Obadiah H. Thank you so much. You are now a policy wonk. 00:10:06 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. 00:10:07 Speaker 1: Thank you, Obadiah. 00:10:08 Speaker 3: Thank you. And finally, I'd like to say thank you to a couple of folks who signed up on an elevated level. We appreciate that very much. 00:10:13 Speaker 1: So first, Frank L. 00:10:15 Speaker 3: Thank you so much. You are now a technocrat. Patrick B., thank you so much. You are now a technocrat. And Josh B., thank you so much. You are now a technocrat. 00:10:23 Speaker 2: I'm a policy wonk. Crikey, mate. That's fantastic. Have yourself a brew. How's your 401k doing, bro? We got to go full tilt boogie on this, Watson, all right? Let's just get down to business. We ain't making that money off that heroin. Why are you pimps so cool? My neck is freakishly large. I declare Infowar on you. 00:10:41 Speaker 3: Thank you so much, Frank. Thank you so much, Patrick. And thank you so much, Josh. Yes, thank you very much to all of you. If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support these gents, too, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, or. 00:10:53 Speaker 1: Or what you could do is... I see your eyes looking around my desk for anything. No, I'm not looking at your desk. I'm looking in my mind to see if there's anything rolling around in there. And all I can think is what you can do is be browbeaten by the administration of your school into doing absolutely nothing. Wait, is that like me? No, this is like my partner is dealing with the fucking. 00:11:18 Speaker 3: I thought I was the metaphorical administration of your school that was browbeating you into doing this shit. 00:11:22 Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, no, not at all. Normally, I fucking pull this off perfectly every time. Oh, yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. 00:11:28 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:11:29 Speaker 3: And with your supportive partner in the scene. Yeah, absolutely. 00:11:34 Speaker 1: Nice little back and forth. 00:11:35 Speaker 3: Takes nothing but the best of how you choose to do this. 00:11:38 Speaker 1: Yeah, I really like the old no-butt improv style. 00:11:42 Speaker 3: That look in your eye is like... a nightmare on an improv stage yeah like that look in your eye was oh no. 00:11:51 Speaker 1: I was just overwhelmed with all of the the tears that just the tears i do this every time every episode now i tell you or oh do you want me to try and not improv it do you want to plan in advance and make it real disingenuous like i would like. 00:12:07 Speaker 3: It to be i mean i would assume if by this point it would be less of a surprise for you I don't want you to necessarily script something out. That's not what I'm asking. Just come in with a little bit of a plan. I'm not even saying that. I'm saying the surprise and terror in your eyes seems... I don't know. It seems like an indication that you might not be able to learn things. I'm worried about you being a memento guy. That might be true. Maybe get a tattoo on your arm. 00:12:37 Speaker 1: Come up with a thing to do right there. 00:12:40 Speaker 2: Okay. 00:12:40 Speaker 1: Now that could happen. 00:12:41 Speaker 3: Dad is going to pimp you into a scene. Just get that tattooed on your arm so you don't forget. That's not a terrible idea. It is. It is a terrible idea. 00:12:48 Speaker 2: I told you. 00:12:49 Speaker 1: I told you, I was off a little bit before we even started recording. 00:12:53 Speaker 3: Look, that tattoo on your arm is a terrible idea, but what's not a terrible idea is taking that generosity and directing it to a charity in your area. 00:12:59 Speaker 1: How dare you swoop in like the hero? How dare you swoop in like you fucking nailed this the whole time, like this was your goddamn plan? 00:13:07 Speaker 3: That's why they call me the vulture. I come in for those bits that are dead on the ground and take the meat. 00:13:15 Speaker 1: All right, I like it. 00:13:16 Speaker 3: I like it. 00:13:16 Speaker 1: You're a nice little Horatio Sands on the improv. 00:13:19 Speaker 3: And that'll be our next shirt is me as a bit vulture. All right. That was great. 00:13:25 Speaker 1: That was good stuff. 00:13:26 Speaker 3: So, Jordan, today, like I said, 27th Sunday episode. Alex comes in and he wants to talk about like important issues. Sure. And actually, I should say, here's an out of context drop from today's show where he's talking about series. He talks about series issues on this show. 00:13:43 Speaker 2: Tons of entertaining Antifa clips. I've got all sorts of funny videos. I've got all this cutesy stuff. You know what? I'm not covering all that. This is a broadcast for really serious people. 00:13:52 Speaker 3: This is a broadcast for serious people. That's the out of context drop from the middle of the show. 00:13:57 Speaker 1: From the middle of the show. 00:13:58 Speaker 3: Right. So now I should tell you this is how the show starts. 00:14:01 Speaker 1: All right. 00:14:02 Speaker 2: But I thought I'd start with something that's really at the heart of it. Remember four years ago how InfoWarriors took over

all the live events and said Bill Clinton's a rapist and pointed out that Bill Clinton and Hillary were globalists and tied to Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile island? We would talk about Jeffrey Epstein on national TV and take over live events, so much so they canceled most of their live events the last few weeks. 00:14:23 Speaker 3: Did they? 00:14:24 Speaker 2: Well, they were out front just yesterday at CNN, the full videos on Infowars.com. CNN was outside the Supreme Court building and thought they'd be able to go live out there. And it turns out everywhere CNN goes, this now happens. Justice on the Supreme Court over the next 30 or 40 years. Right? 00:14:43 Speaker 1: Well, absolutely. I just wanted to say that while. 00:14:46 Speaker 2: We were here, the crowd behind us. 00:14:49 Speaker 1: Trump supporters. 00:14:52 Speaker 3: So that's cool. 00:14:54 Speaker 1: Serious people. 00:14:55 Speaker 3: Serious people. 00:14:57 Speaker 1: It's like on Good Morning America whenever they had the window open behind you and all those people were standing kind of like waving at the camera and shit. Instead, imagine a bunch of people with rocks just like slamming on the glass during the broadcast. 00:15:10 Speaker 3: Yeah. Alex didn't go really hard about Epstein back then. He was doing some Pizzagate stuff, though. That's for damn sure. But the thing that I think is really interesting is what Alex is describing is that in the last election cycle, he literally paid people to to go yell, Bill Clinton's a rapist. 00:15:29 Speaker 1: Yes, he did. 00:15:30 Speaker 3: And if they got on TV, he would give them a bonus. Right. And now they're doing it for free. That's what's going on. 00:15:39 Speaker 1: That's the win of a grifter. That's the real, like, I put in money up top. It was an initial investment, and it's always going to pay off. It's almost as if these people forgot that they were getting paid to do it to begin with. And now they just delight in the monstrosity. 00:15:55 Speaker 2: Right. 00:15:55 Speaker 3: With the same expectation of some sort of charge or payment. It will not come. So serious people. It's real serious. Real serious. We're starting the show talking about people yelling at CNN. 00:16:09 Speaker 1: CNN's fake news! 00:16:10 Speaker 3: Great. 00:16:11 Speaker 1: Fake news! 00:16:12 Speaker 3: So it turns out the Biden's. What about them? They hate everybody. 00:16:16 Speaker 2: Sure. 00:16:17 Speaker 3: And Alex has this information that he's reporting from a very trustworthy source. Okay. 00:16:22 Speaker 2: He grew up next door to their bar and to their restaurant. They even, I think, sold them some property, he was saying. And that's Tyler Nixon up in Delaware. They're on record being family friends because they live next door to each other. And there's a lot of correspondence, photos, all that on record. 00:16:39 Speaker 1: Good thing we got it on record. 00:16:40 Speaker 2: They hate everyone and think they're elitist. And just

have this air, this imperious nature. 00:16:48 Speaker 3: Yeah, great. Tyler Nixon has told you. And they're on record as being friends. Let's look that up. 00:16:55 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:16:56 Speaker 3: Google that. Okay. I don't care. Tyler Nixon is Roger Stone's lawyer friend. 00:17:01 Speaker 1: What about it? 00:17:01 Speaker 3: I don't care. 00:17:02 Speaker 1: Are you saying that he's coming into this with some sort of agenda or bias? 00:17:07 Speaker 3: I'm going to say that I'll take a different source on character stuff about the guy who's running against the guy who got Roger Stone out of prison. Maybe. 00:17:17 Speaker 1: He hates everybody, says John Wayne Gacy. 00:17:22 Speaker 3: Don't care about Tyler Nixon's character assessments. So, for the longest time, Alex has been, every single episode, he's been like, hey, 46 days till the election. Like, really counting down. He has a show that's actually called Election Countdown. 00:17:39 Speaker 1: Yes, that's true. 00:17:40 Speaker 3: On the weeknights. And now he's started to change what his countdown is now that things are getting a little closer. 00:17:48 Speaker 2: Liftoff on this live Sunday, September 27th, 2020. Transmission 114 days out of the inauguration. 00:17:56 Speaker 1: Motherfucker to the election fuck you now as everyone knows. 00:18:03 Speaker 2: Business is promoting human freedom and liberty sure info wars business is being tomorrow's news or next week's news next year's news today and i don't need to go over if you're a regular listener all the things that we've accurately chronicled over the horizon that uh has now manifested itself. 00:18:19 Speaker 3: As soon as he said that my eyes rolled back in my head and just like There was a download of all the things he's been wrong about. Yep, yep, yep, yep. Cascading before my eyes. It's like, okay. I know that you're going to try and relish in being right about the Amy Coney Barrett selection. Sure, sure. And you're going to try and maybe pretend that you didn't say that it was the worst decision possible. Sure. But, yeah, okay. You were right about that. But so were a lot of people. 00:18:45 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:18:46 Speaker 3: There were a lot of people who were saying that she was on. 00:18:47 Speaker 1: I was pretty sure that was like the moment. 00:18:49 Speaker 3: No. 00:18:50 Speaker 2: No. 00:18:51 Speaker 1: Hours after ginsburg died it was everybody going like i think the i think the consensus is amy coney barrett is going to be yeah and. 00:18:59 Speaker 3: Alex i mean i'm not taking it away from him that initially that was the direction he was going it's like hey it looks like uh she's the pick sure uh but he was far from the only person who was putting that out in the days after uh ginsburg's passing totally So Alex gets into talking about something else that he was totally right about way before, way ahead of everybody else. And this is a bit of rewriting history and a bit of just making things up. 00:19:26 Speaker 2: I mean, at the Davos group, they put out a report in February saying, we're going to use COVID-19 to lock down the economy, bring in global digital tracking apps on everybody's phones, shut down all small businesses, and start a third world to death, lower carbon emissions. They call it the Great Reset. We were saying in February, this looks like the big reset that Davos has been calling for to shut down the world economy. and consolidate power for them. 00:19:51 Speaker 3: So Alex is making up a lot of the specific details there. We got into this on a past episode, so I'm not going to break down again how all of this stuff about using COVID-19 to take over shit, that's just completely made up. Yeah, yeah, yeah. However, I'd like to point out how little Alex seems to remember or care about the details of his own stupid conspiracies. He says that the Davos Group put out this document, The Great Reset, in February. The reality is that the thing that he's referring to is a huge online presentation that you can access yourself if you'd like to, which was hosted by the World Economic Forum, not the Davos Group. It was posted online on July 14th, not in February. The thing here is that the Davos Group isn't really an actual title of something. The World Economic Forum does hold their meeting every year in Davos in Switzerland, Which is colloquially referred to as Davos. 00:20:42 Speaker 2: Right. 00:20:42 Speaker 3: Davos meeting. Right, right, right. If Alex were interested in accurately conveying information or even knew, he would say that the World Economic Forum put out this report, not Davos, because... It's precise. It's inaccurate. 00:20:52 Speaker 2: Right. 00:20:52 Speaker 1: It would be like if the World Economic Forum held a thing in Austin and he called it the Austin Group. 00:20:58 Speaker 3: Right. I mean, the Bilderberg Group is the name of an actual group. 00:21:01 Speaker 2: Exactly. 00:21:02 Speaker 3: And it was named after where they had their first meeting. Right. This is different. This is the World Economic Forum has a meeting at Davos called Davos. But to be fair, a lot of people do like. you know, talk about these people as the Davos folks. Sure. But it's not a real thing. And people who put out this Great Reset presentation is a real thing. It's the World Economic Forum. 00:21:23 Speaker 1: Right, right, right. 00:21:23 Speaker 3: He's sloppy with his language on purpose. 00:21:25 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:21:26 Speaker 3: This Great Reset presentation was released by the World Economic Forum in July based on a publication written by Terry Mallaret and Klaus Schwab. And it was basically about exploring the ways in which COVID-19 has revealed fixable problems and how things are structured across a great swath of things like ecological issues, economic issues. It's very wide ranging. Alex is saying it's from February because that's when he thinks the Davos meeting was this year. But it was actually January 21st to

24th. But February is when he would have been mad about it. 00:22:01 Speaker 1: Yeah, that makes more sense. 00:22:02 Speaker 3: But Alex is just talking shit. And if you pay close attention, I think that there's actually a strong indication in there that Alex is intentionally lying. Listen to this section again and listen closely. To where Alex says when the thing came out. 00:22:16 Speaker 2: I mean, at the Davos group, they put out a report in February saying. 00:22:22 Speaker 3: Alex seems to know that the report came out in July. 00:22:24 Speaker 1: He did almost say July. 00:22:25 Speaker 2: Wow. 00:22:25 Speaker 3: Yeah, he seems to know when it came out, but he knows also that that information doesn't fit with the narrative, that he's using high-level globalist documents to inform his reporting. He wants the audience to think that he knew back in February that COVID-19 was a plot to control society because he read this Davos Group document. But if that document didn't exist in February, that falls apart. 00:22:46 Speaker 1: That is an issue. That's a little hole there. 00:22:48 Speaker 3: Alex catches himself when he's about to say July because he knows that that would invalidate the whole timeline that he's building. 00:22:54 Speaker 1: Really wouldn't work. 00:22:55 Speaker 3: So he lies that back to February. He knows exactly what he's doing. This is all just complete nonsense. 00:22:59 Speaker 1: In February, he said there would only be low survivors well that was Mike Adams who he pretends not to know now oh well that's fair that's fair I just I just can't You can't start saying and then say, oh, no, no, February. But that's so much worse. 00:23:17 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a bit of a tell. 00:23:18 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:23:19 Speaker 3: Also, isn't it weird to think that Mike Adams is not in Four Wars anymore because he took COVID too seriously? 00:23:24 Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't even bother. Everything is topsy-turvy surreal now. So I just let that all slide. That one is a matter for historians. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You guys figure that one out. 00:23:34 Speaker 3: We'll deal with that down the line. Yeah. So Alex gets to talking about those two police officers who were shot in Louisville. And this is actually something that I think is really important. Not the story itself, but the methodology by which Alex tells the story. 00:23:53 Speaker 2: District attorneys in the areas being shot are not even charging the people that are shooting police. You heard that right. 00:24:00 Speaker 1: In Louisville. 00:24:02 Speaker 2: They arrested the man who, in front of everyone, fired premeditatively with a handgun, shot a cop in the leg and the gut to police. He's not being charged with attempted murder. 00:24:10 Speaker 3: So this whole thing is just a charade. The suspect in the shooting of the police officers in Louisville has been identified as Lorenzo Johnson, and he's been arrested. 00:24:20 Speaker 1: According to an article in. 00:24:21 Speaker 3: WLKY out of Louisville, quote, he's charged with 14 counts of wanton endangerment on police officer and two counts of assault on police officers. He's pled not guilty and a bond of $ 1 million was set. Alex is trying to play games with his coverage here. He's saying that the liberal district attorneys won't even charge this guy, presumably because they support shooting cops. But that's absolutely not true. He is being charged, which is why Alex then says he's not being charged with attempted murder. So if anyone calls him out over his clear misreporting, he can say that he meant that the liberal district attorneys won't charge him with attempted murder, not that they weren't charging him at all. Sure. Alex is making two separate claims in that sentence, that they aren't charging the shooter at all, and that they're not charging him with attempted murder. The narrative in the story only has weight if you accept the first claim, because it's outrageous, whereas the second claim makes some sense. It might be an issue where the punishment for first-degree assault on a cop is pretty steep. And if the evidence they have might not be successful in leading to a conviction on attempted murder charges, the prosecutors might decide that this is the best way to prosecute the crime. The fact that Johnson isn't being charged with attempted murder is something that's very easy to understand without having to jump to the conclusion that the district attorney must love people who shoot cops. The explanation that assault charges are far more likely to be successfully prosecuted makes total sense, and rational people can understand why a DA would choose that route. Conversely, it's much harder to understand how a DA would take someone who is suspected of shooting police officers and not charge them at all. This is the sort of thing that Alex can use to drum up fear and anger in his audience, because it seems like the only explanation for that would be people in the DA's office want to promote shooting the police. 00:26:01 Speaker 1: Does seem like that. 00:26:03 Speaker 3: Alex wants his audience to hear and respond as if there are no charges for this shooter. But he only wants to be held responsible for reporting that there are no attempted murder charges. 00:26:12 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a nice spot to be in. 00:26:15 Speaker 3: He plays this game a lot. I do like only. 00:26:17 Speaker 1: Receiving the consequences for the thing that is true, but not the lying part. 00:26:23 Speaker 3: That's good. 00:26:24 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:26:24 Speaker 3: That's great. And a little bit later in the episode, he even does this again. 00:26:28 Speaker 2: The final straw is letting Islamicist and communist kill and firebomb and rape people and not charge them. And that's now happening across the United States. It's unbelievable. I got a stack of news on that coming up. You hear what I said? You walk up to a police line, pull a gun and shoot two cops in the stomach

and the leg. Confess to it and they don't charge you with attempted murder. That's Louisville, Kentucky. 00:26:55 Speaker 3: See at the beginning it's talking about people shooting cops and there's no charges then not charged with attempted murder sure wants these two realities to be in people's heads emotionally respond to the part about them being no charges for shooting sure uh the cops and then intellectually if alex has to argue it he could be like i was just saying they weren't charged with attempted murder like go fuck yourself you know what you're doing So in this next clip, we get to a little bit of a reveal, kind of, about Alex's, you know, he's days till the inauguration now instead of days till the election. And that is because we have a new narrative. That is the time between the election and inauguration. That might be hell. Okay. Might be the rapture. I don't know. 00:27:45 Speaker 1: All right. 00:27:46 Speaker 2: It's not even going to be... The mail-in ballot itself that does that, that bullet's already been fired. That arrow's already been loosed. It's the Democrat judges in Michigan and other states like Pennsylvania saying they're going to keep the election going for months, if not longer. Some say weeks. Others say months. To, quote, make sure all the ballots are counted to create a civil war crisis in America. 00:28:14 Speaker 1: I don't think the last part. 00:28:15 Speaker 2: President Trump has to. 00:28:17 Speaker 1: Sir, excuse me. The last part. 00:28:19 Speaker 2: People about the Democrat plan. 00:28:21 Speaker 3: Sir. 00:28:21 Speaker 2: What I call 79 days of hell. 79 days in another brazen attempt, just like the Russia hoax. to claim that the election of Donald John Trump, the 45th president of the United States, the first time and the second time is illegitimate. They know they're losing. Mr. President, you have the Podesta war game that even the New York Times reported on that they can't deny, where they say we're going to contest it because we know we're going to lose. And then we try to hold it up to inauguration day and hope the military takes out Trump. 00:28:55 Speaker 1: Those are quotes. 00:28:56 Speaker 3: No, they're not. No, they're not. Yeah, that's all nonsense. 00:28:59 Speaker 1: I'm real mad. I'm real mad when you invert reality at 180 degrees, Dan. That's annoying and boring. 00:29:05 Speaker 3: What about 79 degrees of hell? 00:29:07 Speaker 1: What about 98 degrees of fun? Yeah, this is where I was going. 00:29:12 Speaker 3: Yeah, 79 Days of Hell is probably going to be an InfoWars shirt soon or something. I mean, it's just you can smell the branding. Oh, man. Yep. So I guess that's where we're at now. The election is going to happen, and then any kind of time that's needed to count ballots and to go through the process is going to be the hell that is the hoax that is stopping Trump from getting elected. uh rightfully of course right and sure sure sure alex can misrepresent this podesta thing

that he didn't even read great um i'm not you know what i'm not looking forward to what's that um we're recording this on sunday yeah and alex was on air When the news was breaking about the New York Times article about Trump's tax. Sure, sure, sure, sure. I am not looking forward to like he doesn't know about it on this episode. 00:30:05 Speaker 2: Oh, no. 00:30:06 Speaker 3: I am not looking forward to what his spin is going to be on that. Oh, my God. That's going to be brutal. Oh, I don't want to deal with it. No, anyway. 00:30:12 Speaker 1: No, no, me neither. 00:30:13 Speaker 3: We'll deal with that when it comes. 00:30:14 Speaker 1: Throw a stone. 00:30:15 Speaker 3: So what what Alex wants Trump to do, and he's basically begging him to do this. He's been he spends almost an entire segment. What he thinks is a direct message to Trump, Mr. President, you need to do this. 00:30:27 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:30:28 Speaker 3: He wants Trump to come out with an ad or a series of ads that essentially argues that he's already won the election. 00:30:35 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:30:37 Speaker 3: You know, basically, what's going to happen afterwards is I have rightfully won, and any attempts by Democrats to say anything is them trying to interfere with the election. 00:30:48 Speaker 1: I want a free and fair election, and as we all know, the outcome of a free and fair election is already decided. 00:30:53 Speaker 3: Which will be I have won. 00:30:54 Speaker 1: Exactly. And I will accept no other explanations. 00:30:58 Speaker 3: Alex wants Trump to come out with that ad campaign now. 00:31:02 Speaker 2: You know you put out these unprecedented ballots and mailed them to dead cats, literally, about 10 years ago, so you can hold things up, and here's where Podesta said it, and here's where Hillary said it, and put out the ads that go like this. And we have all the documents, and it's in the news. We've covered it. Secretly, over a year ago, Democrats began to approach the Pentagon and ask them to remove President Trump if he really won the 2020 election. And then it goes on. The Pentagon said no. 00:31:32 Speaker 3: I think Alex is trying to pitch himself as the VO guy, the voiceover guy for those series of commercials. 00:31:38 Speaker 1: Don LaFontaine? 00:31:39 Speaker 3: Yeah. Hey, Trump, please let me be the voice of your commercials. 00:31:43 Speaker 2: In a world where only one man can legally win an election, will we survive? 00:31:50 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:31:51 Speaker 3: He's really, really trying to push this talking point hard. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And it's scary because it's pretty authoritarian-ish. No, no, no, it's great. Kind of talking point. 00:32:02 Speaker 1: No, it's great, Dan. Mm-hmm. 00:32:04 Speaker 3: And if you think that that's kind of dictator-y and kind of scary, Alex gets into talking about, you know, hey, if there's all of these protests, which are going to destroy cities, Trump might have to call in the military to put down protesters, and then they're going to call him a dictator. 00:32:21 Speaker 1: Who among us has thought that crossing the Rubicon was a bad idea? 00:32:25 Speaker 2: When they activate the BLM and the Antifa and the operatives they've got the BLM and Antifa just decoys for as patsies as cover. They're going to say when the military has to get deployed, when you've got 10 times the burning you currently see, that that's Trump's martial law, you see, and trick everybody, and then it's going to get even worse. And so they believe the crisis will be so big. Oh, here's the other part. They're going to drop the stock market 10,000, 15,000 points during the 79 days. I forgot that part. And then they're going to say, all your pension funds are bad, nothing's worth anything, and all the yuppies, even conservatives, are going to be I remember during the 2008 deal, they plunged the markets to get Obama in, and I went to a soccer game with one of my daughters. 00:33:20 Speaker 1: What now? 00:33:21 Speaker 2: My middle daughter. 00:33:22 Speaker 1: Excuse me? 00:33:22 Speaker 2: And a little peewee soccer. 00:33:24 Speaker 1: Sir? 00:33:25 Speaker 2: All the men had their newspapers out, not even watching the game, just freaking out over their money. I walked over to them, and I'd say, hey, just as soon as Obama gets in, stop market and go back up. And then they were like arrogant yuppies, you know, like, oh, you don't drive a BMW. I'm sure, man. What do you know? I bet it never comes back because they're just schmucks, you know, just airheads. 00:33:46 Speaker 3: Alex seems so angry in these fake stories that he tells. Yeah. All these yuppies with their newspapers and they look down on me, but I was right. Oh, Jesus. 00:33:59 Speaker 1: Jesus Christ. That's such a fucking... God damn it. So W can destroy the economy in eight years. 00:34:10 Speaker 3: He was only doing that to hold the country hostage so Obama would get elected. Okay. 00:34:14 Speaker 1: Well, now that all makes sense. 00:34:15 Speaker 3: Thank you. Yes. 00:34:16 Speaker 1: I apologize. I apologize. I never should have said anything. 00:34:20 Speaker 3: Right. 00:34:20 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:34:21 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah. I apologize. god yeah there's magical solutions to all the all of your little counterpoints based in fair enough quote unquote reality i. 00:34:31 Speaker 1: It's just not fair right that they get to have the reality that dominates things and it's not real that's not fair. 00:34:39 Speaker 3: I think that's a part of it that's not fair yeah. 00:34:41 Speaker 1: That's i i'm starting to think this whole system is not based in fairness dan. 00:34:45 Speaker 3: Nope And apparently, Alex forgot that during the 79 days of hell, they're going to crash the stock market. Sure. 00:34:51 Speaker 2: Well, you know. 00:34:52 Speaker 3: Oh, I forgot this part. 00:34:53 Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. 00:34:54 Speaker 3: Almost as if I'm making it up as I go along and trying to come up with things

that'll scare you. 00:34:58 Speaker 1: I forgot this part. 00:34:59 Speaker 3: Yeah. You know. Oh, I forgot this gigantic detail. 00:35:03 Speaker 1: I forgot that they're also going to send alligators to eat your feet. 00:35:06 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:35:07 Speaker 3: And it won't be crocodiles. 00:35:09 Speaker 1: No, absolutely not. 00:35:10 Speaker 3: You wouldn't be scared of crocodiles. Alligators. 00:35:12 Speaker 1: What is this, Egypt? 00:35:13 Speaker 3: Scary. So yeah, we've thought for a long time, based on the propaganda that people like Alex have been pushing out, that fake ballots are a problem. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Turns out it's not. 00:35:26 Speaker 1: Oh, that's nice. 00:35:26 Speaker 3: Fake ballots aren't the problem. Okay. What? 00:35:29 Speaker 1: That's great. 00:35:30 Speaker 3: Yeah. 00:35:30 Speaker 1: All right. Let's move on then. We can just get rid of it. 00:35:33 Speaker 3: Different problem. 00:35:34 Speaker 1: Oh, no. 00:35:35 Speaker 2: It's not steal the election with the fake ballots. They know the landslide's too big. It's hold it up and create a stock market crash. But that's what told us what the plan is. Or the plan B is they. 00:35:53 Speaker 2: And Trump's on to plan A, so they may go to plan B and just say, Trump loses, even though the numbers don't show it, and then have all the major media announce it, and then say Trump's insane. 00:36:04 Speaker 3: So the plan with the ballots, I guess, is to have a reason for the decision to take longer so they can crash the stock market. Doesn't make any sense. 00:36:16 Speaker 1: No, that doesn't make any sense. 00:36:17 Speaker 3: Look, this is all fun and games for Alex, but honestly, I listened to this episode as someone who's listened to a lot of Alex's work. And if you believe anything he's been saying, there's no reason to think that this election matters. There's no reason that Alex should be worked up about whether or not the globalists are successful in his imaginary plan to keep Trump from re-election because it's ultimately trivial. Mere days ago on his show, Alex discussed how the globalists' plan A is to wait until robots are working the fields and shit. Then they'll make us all like cattle with welfare and vaccines and tracking chips, which will lead to the population being killed off in a few years. Of course. However, Alex's life work screwed up plans in the timeline. 00:36:54 Speaker 2: Right. 00:36:54 Speaker 3: So it looked like the globalists, who work for the literal Christian devil, were going to have to go with plan B. which is the release of super bioweapons, which will just kill everyone, probably through the deployment of robot trash trucks that release electromagnetic weapons. 00:37:06 Speaker 1: And they'll do it in a very pouty way. 00:37:08 Speaker 3: Yes. 00:37:08 Speaker 1: How dare you make. 00:37:09 Speaker 3: Us kill you, bastard? Because they wanted to have the fun. 00:37:11 Speaker 1: You really ruined it for us, Alex. 00:37:12 Speaker 3: Only a few people will survive this, and when it's all said and done, they'll need to crawl out of the rubble and enact vengeance for the fallen patriots. Naturally. Trump being elected or Biden being elected should not matter at all to anyone who believes Alex means a word he says. Sure, you may prefer Trump, but him getting another four years means nothing when the globalists will just release super bioweapons if he threatens their plans at all. Mail-in ballots mean nothing. Antifa means nothing. The stock market crashing means nothing because none of it has any effect on what the actual outcome is. If Alex meant a goddamn word that came out of his mouth and his show wasn't just a platform to push for Christian identity politics while scaring listeners into buying his dumb pills, this show would not be about politics anymore. Every single minute of his show should be dedicated towards educating the population about how to survive in this post-super bioweapon release world so as to increase the chances that someone who makes it through will be able to recreate society. He's been clear that the globalist plans are not something they can stop. The extinction level event is going to happen, so why the fuck is he on air rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic? This may seem like a small point, but it's not. The fact that Alex cares at all about whether or not Trump stays in office reveals that he doesn't believe his own conspiracies. He wants Trump to stay in power because that furthers the white Christian identity politics that he supports. And he's using the conception of all this conspiracy bullshit in order to trick his audience into thinking something bigger is going on to keep them on board. That's all that's going on. He can't even remember that. couple days ago he was fucking yelling about how like all plan b we're all dead anyways who fucking robot trash trucks from. 00:38:49 Speaker 1: My emotional day of course the globalists are going to kill everybody when he's having an emotional. 00:38:54 Speaker 3: Look i drank some codeine cough syrup and watched soylent green i got real freaked out and i decided that we're all gonna die by way of trash truck and uh now hey we gotta elect trump it's a life or death thing to elect trump because trump we'll stop the robot trash trucks. 00:39:09 Speaker 1: If I did know with 100% certainty that the globalists were just going to kill us all within the next year, that would almost bring me a sense of calm. Like, I wouldn't be angry on air. I'd be like, you know, let's appreciate the things that we have in the time we have left. We're all going to die no matter what. And since we all die at the same time, it's like nobody died. Nobody's going to miss us. Nobody loses their friends. It's all the same. 00:39:37 Speaker 3: Well, I mean, the reality with or without imaginary globalist murder is that we all will die. And we don't have a lot of control over a lot of coincidences in life. Exactly. A

lot of fretting about that is wasted time. And I'm guilty of that in the present and in the past. And yes, certainly. 00:40:01 Speaker 1: Now, this has made us all take a lot more of the philosophical long view of like, you know, these cycles happen. Sure, my generation will be decimated, obviously. But you know what? This is just part of the long game, Dan. 00:40:16 Speaker 3: Yeah. You're bumming me out, man. 00:40:18 Speaker 1: Yeah, don't worry about it. It's an endless cycle of violence, Dan. 00:40:22 Speaker 3: Come on! 00:40:23 Speaker 1: I just think, I mean, leaving what you're bringing to the table aside, I think... Do you want to go back and try that bit again from the beginning? 00:40:32 Speaker 3: No, I think you were fine. I just, I don't have a lot to add to it other than you're bumming me out. I think that if you look at what Alex is saying, though, it's a real problem because... All this should be trivial, minutiae to him. It should mean nothing. His ultimate quest is to stop the globalists. And if you believe the way he's been, you know, his rhetoric has evolved. Sure. Then this cycle, it's impossible to defeat the globalists. Yeah. The only thing that can happen is after this cataclysm, people find Soros and take him out. 00:41:07 Speaker 4: Right. 00:41:07 Speaker 3: Or whatever. You know? And so, like, hey, the best way to succeed in your mission is to discuss... life after right right right right right how do you clean water like that would. 00:41:20 Speaker 1: Be what his show would be i don't think that's a terrible show i think we should probably find a show like that and see if we can critique it for being racist there's a lot of useful information that he could be conveying to his audience i don't think it's as profitable as being like biden's a demon who only cares about himself so say sure roger stone's lawyer and then trying to, like, juice everybody up for this election that, based on his own worldview, is meaningless. All right, so here's what you can do. You can boil water. You can also, and this is a thing not a lot of people know, you can put a little bit of silver in there, and that will also disinfect the water, make it a little bit drinkable. 00:41:57 Speaker 4: Now. 00:41:57 Speaker 1: You're going to need to wait after that. 00:41:58 Speaker 3: Now. 00:41:59 Speaker 1: Buy my zinc pills, you idiots. 00:42:01 Speaker 3: The post-apocalyptic Attorney General of New York Township will sue me for trying to sell you silver, but... Don't listen to her. 00:42:10 Speaker 1: With mud on her face, holding a fucking torch. 00:42:14 Speaker 2: Give us the gasoline outright. 00:42:16 Speaker 3: I just get struck by that. If Alex truly believes that the devil and all this stuff... The plan B is to just kill everybody with the super bioweapon. 00:42:29 Speaker 1: Sure, why not? 00:42:30 Speaker 3: Nothing that he's saying means anything. All this is so stupid. Oh, yeah. 00:42:36 Speaker 2: Oh, man. 00:42:37 Speaker 3: Anyway... Speaking of things that are stupid, Amy Coney Barrett has been announced as Trump's pick for a nominee for the Supreme Court. Alex has been saying that this is a very bad idea with Robert Barnes for a bit, but hey, you've got to fall in line. 00:42:55 Speaker 2: And I don't want to be pushing hopium on people. We've got a problem, and obviously I'm going to end up supporting the nomination because the Democrats are going to try to block it. They would put somebody in probably even worse. At least she's anti-abortion. but she is for forced inoculation. 00:43:11 Speaker 3: What a fucking coward worm. Look at this guy. I mean, I have a worm farm, and I'm calling him a worm. 00:43:16 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah. 00:43:17 Speaker 3: This fucking dude, he's like, okay, yeah, obviously I'm not into this, but hey, I'm going to support her because the Democrats don't like her, and hey, they would choose someone worse. 00:43:27 Speaker 2: Great. 00:43:29 Speaker 1: Cool. 00:43:30 Speaker 3: Pointless point. And then he's like, eh, she's against abortion, but also she's in favor of forced vaccines. 00:43:37 Speaker 4: So. 00:43:38 Speaker 1: Then you're saying that you want a Supreme Court justice who is in favor of the globalist plan to vaccine and vaccinate everyone and kill them. 00:43:48 Speaker 3: Yep. 00:43:49 Speaker 1: That is strength of conviction, Dan. 00:43:52 Speaker 3: And for some reason, Trump nominated her to be on the Supreme Court. Odd. Despite that belief in her believing and supporting one of the pillars of the globalist plan. 00:44:03 Speaker 2: Yeah. Wow. Weird. 00:44:04 Speaker 1: But hey. 00:44:06 Speaker 3: Democrats would be worse. 00:44:07 Speaker 1: Well, I mean, Democrats would probably put somebody in there who wants to force to vaccinate everybody, which now that you think about it, that would suggest that there is an elite class of people who all want to force to vaccinate everybody. So Alex should really be against all of them, not for some of them. 00:44:27 Speaker 3: Well, there's a real struggle that Alex is going through because, like, the Democrats are clearly against anybody, Trump nominating anybody to the Supreme Court, and especially Barrett. But she has a lot of ideas that Alex doesn't like. But he's got to support her because the Democrats don't like... See, whenever you create your politics that's basically just oppositional defiance, you end up in holes like this. It's an issue. Yeah. 00:44:54 Speaker 2: But again, the Democrats are already saying kill her, they hate her, blah, blah, blah. I don't like them. I'm not trying to join them. I'm not saying don't confirm her. I'm just saying... My God, I wish I'd have been on this earlier and we'd have been hammering this harder to get to the president because I know the president means well. And now they've got, well, they're going to have five justices. She's going to join the Democrats in forced inoculation and lockdowns, which she just ruled on. And

I've got the articles right here. 00:45:24 Speaker 3: Oh, no, she's pro-lockdown and pro-vaccines. 00:45:27 Speaker 4: Oh, no. 00:45:28 Speaker 3: Oh, but the Democrats don't like her. I can't be opposed to her without joining the Democrats. 00:45:34 Speaker 1: Oh, no. 00:45:34 Speaker 3: See, this is the difference between someone like Alex and someone like Steve Pachanek. Like, Steve can come on Alex's show and... Fuck! 00:45:41 Speaker 1: Amy cohen barrett i think melania trump should be on. 00:45:45 Speaker 3: There i have not heard steve's take on this pick but when gorsuch was nominated steve was like this is the worst fucking idea ever he's a neocon we can't accept this yep and he didn't have any qualms about like being against trump's pick for a it violated some piece of his politics. He didn't think that, like, oh, this is me siding with the Dems or something. Alex is such a baby that he can't justify his politics except in opposition to X. And so, like, he thinks, oh, if I'm against this nomination because she's a bad candidate, I am now a globalist. 00:46:21 Speaker 1: I'm a Democrat. There's no other explanation for me. 00:46:24 Speaker 4: Oh, no. 00:46:26 Speaker 1: I mean, that is such their strength and the reason that they get conned by everybody so much is they're unified in one belief. Anything the left likes is evil. So they don't have to think hard. about their political positions and they're a unified block so they have greater strength well another piece of it too and it also makes you susceptible to anything that they don't like means you have to support it. 00:46:51 Speaker 3: Well another piece of it too that i think especially in this case for alex is that like obviously he believes that like soros pays all the protesters and he runs blm and antifa and everything And so the real function of that is to invalidate left-leaning arguments that you hear. Or socially responsible, social equity-type arguments. 00:47:13 Speaker 1: Toss a little Pez dispenser in there. 00:47:15 Speaker 3: Right, sure. You have this, like, anytime you hear people talking about Black Lives Mattering, there's an element of, hey, this is paid. Anytime there's protest, it's paid protesters. These aren't valid opinions that people would have if they weren't coerced into having them. And he's spent so much time with those narratives that, you know, if you're listening to him, you could be forgiven if you believe on some level that anybody who believes anything to the right or I'm sorry, to the left of Rand Paul is being paid to believe those things. It's all astroturf protests and all this. It's an illusion. It's a foreign takeover or whatever. 00:47:53 Speaker 2: Sure. 00:47:53 Speaker 3: So, for Alex, there's a position that needs to be called artificial, and that is opposing Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court justice. All of this has to be another thing that's, like, it's ludicrous for someone to believe it, but... It's not. And Alex himself should. 00:48:11 Speaker 1: Be opposed to it. 00:48:12 Speaker 3: And he can't. He can't be opposed to it. Not because that's him joining the left, but because that's having the same opinion as them and being a free thinker. It opens up Pandora's box where the audience could start to realize like, oh, you believe the same thing. you're not getting paid to believe maybe they aren't getting paid to believe their beliefs oh. 00:48:33 Speaker 1: Yeah can't really can't really jive with that it opens it opens up a box where you could accidentally invite um philosophical alliances what's he gonna say i think the democrats are right on this one like imagine him saying that in 2020 imagine that can't do it get the fuck out of here yep So Robert Barnes comes in to rub Alex's belly that he's showing to Trump at all times. 00:48:58 Speaker 3: Well, they have to come up with a way to play this because, I mean, obviously you want someone like her on the court, but you also don't. Right. And you've got to figure out why the fuck did Trump nominate this person if she's pro-lockdown and pro-vaccine. 00:49:14 Speaker 1: Sure seems difficult to figure that one out. 00:49:16 Speaker 3: Yeah. The 22 judges that. 00:49:20 Speaker 4: The president was considering only one had supported the lockdown and that was judge barrett. 00:49:26 Speaker 1: Oh this is a deep hole okay so now you should be against. 00:49:31 Speaker 3: Her oh yeah And William Barr, the Attorney General, has come out and said that the lockdown is the gravest violation of civil rights since slavery. 00:49:40 Speaker 1: And that's why we need her on the Supreme Court. 00:49:43 Speaker 3: I don't know how you thread this needle. 00:49:45 Speaker 1: I don't think you need to worry about it because reality doesn't worry you, so why bother? 00:49:50 Speaker 3: Well, it turns out that this is all a machination of the Federalist Society. Okay. 00:49:56 Speaker 4: So what they told Trump is that she would support him in the election because she was part of the Bush v. Gore team, and that's how they got Trump to go along with it. Trump's not been following the lockdown lawsuits in any detail or the forced vaccination cases. 00:50:10 Speaker 2: Brother, I've been busy, too. You're the one that told me about it. 00:50:17 Speaker 3: Hey brother i love that response hey uh trump didn't know that she was the worst possible choice brother i've been busy too. 00:50:28 Speaker 1: I'm busy too what else what else you got come on come on next next thing that's great what else have i ignored. 00:50:35 Speaker 3: Also the undercurrent there of barnes's comments are that Trump got bamboozled into electing or nominating a pro-lockdown, pro-vaccine, mandatory vaccine candidate because he was told she would hand him the election. 00:50:52 Speaker 1: Right. Because she was part of the Bush-Gore team. Whenever Bush stole the election. Which Alex has called that. That's what he said that was, stealing the election. Because it

was stealing an election. 00:51:03 Speaker 3: Yeah, so this doesn't seem like a great... argument. The Federalist Society told him that they could steal the election and so he said that everybody could get vaccinated. 00:51:15 Speaker 1: Think about how truly evil you think everyone involved in that story is if you're Barnes. very like how can you not understand that your guy who's your god king you telling me that he got bamboozled by the federalist society those fuck nuts well and like think about that's the guy that you want to be president and think about how pathetic the argument is too like if barnes is saying that these people convinced trump To nominate this person. 00:51:47 Speaker 3: Right. Because of the Bush v. Gore stealing of an election, she's going to help you out. Yeah. Right? That's what he gets. Yeah. Now, what she brings to the table, if you're Barnes and Alex, is... Lockdowns and forced vaccinations. Which they believe is genocide of the entire population. So essentially, Trump would have sold out the entire population in order to stay in power. 00:52:14 Speaker 4: Yeah. 00:52:15 Speaker 3: That's the argument that he can come up with. 00:52:17 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:52:17 Speaker 3: That's not good. 00:52:18 Speaker 1: No, that's perfect. See, that convinced me. I really love the idea of nominating a Supreme Court justice. ignoring everything that you disagree with her about simply because she is more than willing to help you steal an election i don't get it what's wrong with that dan. 00:52:34 Speaker 3: It's bad i mean it's just a it's a shoddy argument but i don't know what else they have because they obviously want there to be a right-wing leaning court right but at the same time they've been pretty clear they don't like this lady And also they can't stop supporting Trump. It's very weird. 00:52:50 Speaker 1: It's a real bummer that Republicans are the dumbest fucking. 00:52:52 Speaker 3: People on the planet. It's a really interesting box, particularly that Alex and Barnes have created for themselves. 00:52:58 Speaker 1: Yeah. 00:52:58 Speaker 3: If they just hadn't covered this much and talked all this shit, then they could just pretend. 00:53:04 Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's like William Barr. They said that Barr was a terrible choice, and then he was elected, and they're like, and they know why, because everybody knew why Barr was appointed there, because he had previously helped people cover up fucking crimes, and so he was hired to help people cover up crimes. 00:53:20 Speaker 3: Alex does later try to ponder whether she could be another William Barr, someone who, like. 00:53:27 Speaker 1: Helps you cover up crimes. 00:53:28 Speaker 3: Someone who's like, hey, this looks like a bad idea, but Trump can get her in line. 00:53:33 Speaker 1: She's going to help me cover up crimes. 00:53:34 Speaker 3: We'll get to that in a little bit. But before we do, we have to wrestle with a really difficult thing here. And that is that the Koch brothers, well, the one who's still alive, and the Koch foundations have supported Amy Coney Barrett. And that is something... Mic down for this because this is going to probably piss you off. 00:53:54 Speaker 4: The Koch family put in massive amounts of money and effort to make sure Barrett got the pick, and they're already spending more money than the Republican Party is to make sure she gets on the bench. And people who may not know, the Koch family is big on their pro-immigration, actually. They're also big on protecting big tech. 00:54:12 Speaker 2: Oh, they've given more money to Democrats than to Republicans. That's a psyop. Wow. Wow! 00:54:18 Speaker 4: What? 00:54:20 Speaker 3: That's one of the first times I've seen you have to get up in your chair. 00:54:23 Speaker 1: Honestly, that makes me shiver. Like, I'm physically. 00:54:28 Speaker 3: Shivering right now. You reacted like you just took a shot of something weird for the first time. Like, an alcohol you've never tasted. 00:54:34 Speaker 2: Like, ooh! 00:54:34 Speaker 1: That was a bit of... Like, a surge went through you. That one was... That's a big swing. That's a Pachanic-level swing right there. 00:54:41 Speaker 3: That is gaslighting. Wow. Yeah. 00:54:43 Speaker 2: Wow. 00:54:43 Speaker 3: But the way you get around that is, like, Alex has now said that being a libertarian was the stupidest thing ever. 00:54:49 Speaker 1: Sure. 00:54:49 Speaker 3: And, like, So he can say that the libertarians are actually lefty. Secretly democratic. Oh my god. 00:54:56 Speaker 2: Or whatever. 00:54:56 Speaker 3: Kill me. Yeah, so the Koch brothers are a psyop, and they mostly give to democrats. This is going to be a really difficult thing for Alex to unwrite a lot of his career, considering the Citizens for a Sound Economy was Koch-funded, and Ron Paul was the first president of it way back, and then Koch brothers, through FreedomWorks, funded and AstroTurfed a ton of the Tea Party, which is I mean, that alone, it's tough to understand how they're pro-immigration. 00:55:24 Speaker 4: Yeah. 00:55:25 Speaker 3: I think it's... The people who funded the Tea Party are pro-immigration. 00:55:29 Speaker 1: You know, I'm not enjoying watching or listening to these two guys eat what is clearly a big bowl of shit. 00:55:36 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:55:37 Speaker 1: Like, they are taking big spoonfuls of... Like, they're convincing me that it's a bad idea while they're trying to convince me it's a good idea. 00:55:44 Speaker 3: Well, I kind of enjoy it, honestly. I did, too! Well, here's the thing. I agree with you, but that sound you just made is exactly how I feel. Yeah. Because I enjoy it on one level, which is it's kind of funny to see Alex and Barnes be uncomfortable in their own bed. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, like, you did this to yourself, you dumbasses. 00:56:02 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. 00:56:03 Speaker 3: And it is funny to hear that. Like, you have to, like, in order to make things

make sense... You have to be like, yeah, you know, the Koch brothers are really leftist. Yeah. 00:56:11 Speaker 1: You know, like that kind of thing is pretty funny. I am going to take a big bite of this poop. 00:56:15 Speaker 3: Yeah. It's uncomfortable because the reality doesn't change. Like laughing at this dumb shit leaves us in the same position that in the real world. Exactly. That is Amy Coney Barrett has a decent chance of getting on the Supreme Court. And then what do we do? 00:56:31 Speaker 4: Yeah. 00:56:31 Speaker 3: You know, like. It's the same thing with laughing at Alex's stupid ideas about the globalists' plan A and plan B. It's like, yes, this is funny, and this is the only way that you can keep your grift running. 00:56:41 Speaker 2: Right, right, right. 00:56:41 Speaker 3: But at the same time, it's really just a facade on the real-life issues that you and I and everybody listening have to deal with. 00:56:50 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:56:51 Speaker 3: In the real world. Yeah. And so, yeah, it's bittersweet. It's a shit sandwich you can enjoy watching them eat, but you know that, like, it still affects you. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That does suck. 00:57:00 Speaker 1: It does. It's not unadulterated. 00:57:03 Speaker 3: Yeah. 00:57:03 Speaker 1: That's what fucks me up. 00:57:04 Speaker 3: It's not pure schadenfreude. 00:57:05 Speaker 1: I get to schadenfreude But then at the end of it, I'm just shivering and angry. You know, it's a very unsatisfying blue balls feeling of schadenfreude. 00:57:14 Speaker 3: That's one of the problems with the present day stuff. Yeah. That's the reality of the issues that they talk about and the real world impact things are going to have tomorrow and the week after. It's really tough to fully enjoy it in the same way that looking back on the past, you know, we have hindsight. We have a gift of hindsight that makes the schadenfreude a little bit purer. Yeah. um the consequences are unclear and that's tough i think what's. 00:57:41 Speaker 1: Funny to me is i don't think it really matters too much for them to nominate and and sit another supreme court justice like because if you add coney barrett to that the supreme court is so comically uh corrupted that There's no point in even having it. 00:58:03 Speaker 3: We've talked about this and I don't wholly disagree with you, but that still. 00:58:08 Speaker 1: But what that means is that even then, you know, whenever if we elect Biden and that actually works, ballots are great, that we were going to have to reckon with the Supreme Court anyways. Now it's just so blatantly obvious that we have to either pack the court or frankly remake the entire system that it's it's like it's not too much different to me in terms of what's going to or what needs to be done to correct. 00:58:38 Speaker 3: It right do you know what i'm saying well yes and and i don't know what the answer to that is but i i do want to offer this slight insight from looking at these worlds i think that this could be a critical misstep uh on trump's part yeah Amy Coney Barrett is somebody who, specifically because of these pro-vaccine, pro-lockdown type positions, is someone who's highly susceptible to attack from the fringe right. There is a possibility that this could have such backlash on people who are like Ted Cruz's, like these types of people that they might end up not being able to support her nomination for fear of pissing off the QAnon crowd or those people, the anti-vax crowd who have such loud voices within their coalition now. So I think that there's a possibility that this nomination could get stalled to the point where it might not go through. Right. And we end up with getting to the election with an opening. 00:59:39 Speaker 4: Right. 00:59:39 Speaker 1: No, if I'm the Democrat. 00:59:41 Speaker 3: Oh, sorry. There are other people that could have been nominated that wouldn't have had that difficulty that I think could have put us in a much more difficult position. 00:59:48 Speaker 2: Right. 00:59:49 Speaker 3: I think that Barrett is probably not good to be on the Supreme Court. But the nomination itself might be the best case scenario. Right. It's going to really piss off a lot of the base. 01:00:00 Speaker 1: Totally. 01:00:01 Speaker 3: Trump's base. And I think that's a positive. 01:00:08 Speaker 1: I would appeal to far-right bigotry more than anything else. 01:00:12 Speaker 3: So that's what you do? 01:00:13 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, what I would say they should do is, like, a reverse psychology appeal to the far-right's bigotry. 01:00:22 Speaker 3: Rope-a-dope. 01:00:22 Speaker 1: Like, seriously, just compliment her for all the stuff that she believes that the far-right fringe would absolutely lose their shit about. 01:00:30 Speaker 3: Do you mean to tell me, Ms. Barrett, that you believe in science? 01:00:33 Speaker 2: Yeah. 01:00:34 Speaker 1: Like, seriously. 01:00:35 Speaker 3: Fantastic. 01:00:35 Speaker 1: Like, I think it's great that you believe vaccines are good. Who would you prefer a vaccine? Would you prefer everyone get vaccinated? You know, like that kind of thing. It's just over and over and over again until they realize that the far right is so bigoted they won't even deal with the far right. Yeah, I think that that strategy could be useful in some way. I mean, somebody should try it. 01:00:59 Speaker 3: I think that. 01:01:00 Speaker 1: Everything is on the table. 01:01:02 Speaker 3: I think that this is a candidate who is particularly vulnerable to angering that base. 01:01:10 Speaker 1: Totally. 01:01:10 Speaker 3: And I think it is a tool that is in the left's disposal. And the Democrats, if they should like to delay this or make this not happen... I think that's the best way to go about it because there are a lot of people, and Alex rightfully recognizes a couple of the attack points that could be used. And I think it would be good. 01:01:31 Speaker 1: Well, they hate her. 01:01:33 Speaker 4:

Well. 01:01:34 Speaker 1: They're clearly saying that they don't like her. Yes. They're eating shit. 01:01:38 Speaker 3: And they're really setting themselves up for disappointment. 01:01:41 Speaker 2: Totally. Totally. 01:01:42 Speaker 4: So Jacobson was the foundation for the Buck decision, which was forced sterilizations and the peak of eugenics in America. It was the basis for the Korematsu decision, which was the detention camps in America. So Jacobson is the most dangerous decision ever issued in American constitutional legal history. 01:01:59 Speaker 1: Citizens United. 01:01:59 Speaker 2: We can kill your ass. I mean, we can put you in a concentration camp. 01:02:03 Speaker 4: Jacobson was cited as the grounds for the forced draft. Jacobson was cited as the grounds that you could kill Americans overseas as enemy combatants. 01:02:12 Speaker 1: By the way, you're not just saying that. 01:02:14 Speaker 2: I looked this up. Jacobson is seen as one of the most evil rulings in U.S. history, but there's been a lot of evil ones. And this lady just endorsed it in 2020. Man, you talk about shaking that tail feather. 01:02:23 Speaker 3: Shaking that tail feather. 01:02:24 Speaker 2: What are we doing? What are you idiots doing? 01:02:28 Speaker 1: You're selling me on not... They're so fucking stupid. 01:02:33 Speaker 3: Yeah, so, I mean. 01:02:34 Speaker 1: God, have a fucking spine! 01:02:37 Speaker 3: Yeah, so this goes to show, like, how potent the potential backlash to this nomination could be. Like, I don't know, because I'm not a legal scholar, I don't know if Jacobson v. Massachusetts is really as evil as they're saying. 01:02:50 Speaker 2: Sure. 01:02:51 Speaker 3: I know that the underlying case was about a guy in 1905 was when the decision happened. It was a guy named Henning Jacobson, and he opposed this law in Massachusetts where vaccines were mandatory... But if you refused to get one, they'd fine you $ 5. And he didn't like that because he didn't want to pay that $ 5. So the case went up to the Supreme Court and they ruled against him, finding that the Massachusetts law was not unconstitutional. Sure. And it was up for legislatures to decide this stuff as opposed to the courts. 01:03:17 Speaker 2: Okay. 01:03:17 Speaker 3: That kind of makes sense. You know, like not getting vaccinated, it creates a public health burden. And that translates to public expenses a lot of the time. Yep. So if you, it is a kind of dicey, hairy territory when it's like forcing people to get vaccines or any kind of medical thing, you know, bodily autonomy. Sure. Kind of decisions. I don't want to litigate that because I can't. But I think a fine compromise could be that if you don't get a vaccine, you pay a fine. You help society deal with the potential consequences. 01:03:49 Speaker 2: Right. 01:03:50 Speaker 3: And, you know, anyway, that's what Jacobson is. Now, whatever the reality of how it's been used subsequently to that, I don't know. Yeah. But I do

know that Alex and Barnes are saying that it basically is the justification for literally all evil. 01:04:05 Speaker 1: And she supports it. This year she supported it. Jesus Christ. 01:04:11 Speaker 3: It's not like she supported it the first year out of college. 01:04:13 Speaker 4: Yeah. 01:04:14 Speaker 3: She supports it now. 01:04:15 Speaker 4: Yep. 01:04:16 Speaker 1: I can't believe how succinctly they are making the case for not supporting her. 01:04:22 Speaker 2: Yeah. 01:04:23 Speaker 3: And at the same time... Saying you gotta support her. 01:04:25 Speaker 1: You gotta support her. 01:04:26 Speaker 3: Yeah. 01:04:26 Speaker 1: That is so fucking pathetic. 01:04:29 Speaker 3: Now, it gets even weirder because this was a level of gaslighting that I don't think... I've experienced even on InfoWars. 01:04:40 Speaker 2: Oh, no. 01:04:41 Speaker 3: Mic down for this. Okay. 01:04:42 Speaker 1: Am I going to shiver again? 01:04:43 Speaker 3: Yes, you are. This is a fucking pretzel. 01:04:47 Speaker 4: Bigger message is we need trump elected now more than ever because the effect of barrett being on the bench means that the only thing stopping forced vaccines the only thing stopping another national lockdown the only thing stopping these uh sort of george soros coke family big money elite agenda bill gates agenda will be donald trump getting. 01:05:09 Speaker 3: Re-elected that's amazing so the only thing. 01:05:14 Speaker 1: With we want trump to appoint this lady who is pro-forced vaccination in order to stop forced vaccinations well no no. 01:05:26 Speaker 3: So trump did by himself make the decision to nominate this person for the supreme court and them being on the supreme court is going to make Forced vaccinations and lockdowns happen. And that is why we need to re-elect the person who nominated that person for the Supreme Court because he's the only thing that's stopping forced vaccinations and lockdowns. 01:05:47 Speaker 1: Exactly. 01:05:48 Speaker 3: What the fuck? 01:05:49 Speaker 1: Exactly. That makes perfect sense. 01:05:50 Speaker 2: You know what? 01:05:51 Speaker 3: This would be like, legitimately, this would be like trying to argue that we need to vote for Hillary to save us from Merrick Garland. 01:05:58 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah. 01:05:58 Speaker 3: Yeah, it would be that would even be weaker because she wouldn't have nominated. 01:06:03 Speaker 2: Yeah. 01:06:03 Speaker 3: If Obama had a second term in 2016, let's say his first election was in 2012. Right. Sure. Just imagine rewrite history. He nominates Merrick Garland. 01:06:12 Speaker 2: Yep. 01:06:13 Speaker 3: Merrick Garland goes through. And then, I don't know, the young Turks is like making the argument that we got to reelect Obama to save us from Merrick Garland. So stupid. 01:06:23 Speaker 1: I just, I just can't, I can't believe. This is the flimsiest shit. I just can't believe this. You know, you want people to find some backbone in times of crisis. Just a little bit. But we see it from no one. We, no one. We, Democrats don't have a backbone. Republicans don't have a backbone. Fucking local governments don't have a backbone. 01:06:48 Speaker 3: We need Trump. To save us from the consequences of Trump's direct appointments. 01:06:54 Speaker 1: That makes perfect sense. No one could stop it. Because if we had a Democrat in there, they'd nominate somebody who was for forced vaccinations. 01:07:03 Speaker 3: And lockdowns. 01:07:03 Speaker 1: And lockdowns. That would be even worse. 01:07:06 Speaker 3: I guess. 01:07:06 Speaker 2: What? Wow. 01:07:09 Speaker 3: When I hear things like that, I really wonder if someone like Barnes even knows what he's saying. He must. He's a smart guy. 01:07:18 Speaker 1: He's a lawyer. 01:07:18 Speaker 3: You would hope. He's not an idiot. I've seen him in various interview scenarios. And like he knows, like he has a pretty good sense about himself. But he's saying legitimately, we need Trump to get reelected to fight against his Supreme Court nomination that he chose to make himself. 01:07:38 Speaker 1: I mean, it is it's not even making a lesser of two evils arguments. It's making an evil of two evils argument. You know, like we have to elect this guy. He's evil. 01:07:50 Speaker 3: Well he put someone evil on the supreme court. 01:07:52 Speaker 1: Yeah he just the other guy is so evil yeah and this guy is evil in the same exact way and we gotta get him. 01:08:00 Speaker 3: And what if like you know in the next four years there's another opening on the supreme court we might need uh trump to have a third term to fight whoever he nominates. 01:08:10 Speaker 1: I think i think whenever trump nominates uh fucking bernie sanders to the bench We're going to have to elect Trump for a third term in order to keep him from becoming a socialist. 01:08:19 Speaker 3: I don't know what's going on anymore. 01:08:21 Speaker 1: No, this doesn't mean anything. 01:08:22 Speaker 3: Nope. 01:08:22 Speaker 1: They just want to kill leftists. That's all you want. Say it. 01:08:26 Speaker 3: And all this shit is such a pretzel. Like, you're bending over backwards to blame... Like, oh, the Federalist Society was actually... The leftist Koch brothers are the ones who. 01:08:36 Speaker 1: The Federalist Society has anything other than fucking right-wing dingbats. 01:08:40 Speaker 3: Yeah, and if Trump is as strong of a leader and as brave and smart as you all say he is, then the Federalist Society doesn't get to take credit for a nomination that is only Trump's to make. 01:08:52 Speaker 1: This is terrible. 01:08:53 Speaker 3: Yeah, very stupid. It's really. 01:08:55 Speaker 1: I must... You know, it's one of those things where I think the right has to be a little... disappointed in their dictator. You know, like Mussolini wasn't really good at being a dictator, but he was competent. You know, they were evil dictators who kind of knew how to dictate right. And Trump doesn't even know how to do that

right. 01:09:15 Speaker 3: Yeah, they're in a unique position of like an embarrassing dictator. 01:09:18 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's terrible. 01:09:18 Speaker 3: That's terrible. So you were asking earlier about the William Barr sort of thing where it's like, you know, hey, he's bad, but Trump made him good. Sure. Kind of that argument that they make. 01:09:30 Speaker 2: Yeah. 01:09:30 Speaker 3: And I told you that that comes up. And Alex is trying to talk to Barnes about like, hey, you know, hey, Barr, we didn't like him. He was sketchy, but it turns out he's pretty good. 01:09:41 Speaker 1: We like him. 01:09:42 Speaker 3: He's doing the stuff we want. What about. 01:09:45 Speaker 1: What about Barrett? 01:09:46 Speaker 3: Maybe she'll be like that. And this is so weak. This is just the weakest thing ever. 01:09:52 Speaker 2: Trump makes mistakes, he gets educated. I think we educate him and warn him on this lady so that when he gets concessions and behind the scenes up front, she gets hit with some real questions by Republicans instead of fawning at her so that we can get her position to not be a total traitor. Because I think she's a follower, Barrett is, and I think overall she has some good ideas, some really bad ideas. I think just her M.O., now that I've had a chance to look at her, maybe I'm wrong, is that if there's enough pressure put on her at the hearings about a culture that she won't be the creature of the Koch brothers and that Trump can cut her out? Or is that just no hope? 01:10:27 Speaker 4: Oh, no, there's hope of that because she's a memorizer personality. She's not like a Bork-level intellect. So she's one of those people that memorized everything in school and was kind of the teacher's pet kind of personality. 01:10:38 Speaker 2: But wasn't Bork also another kind of authoritarian? Oh, yes. 01:10:43 Speaker 4: Bork had a lot of crazy ideas. He was for forced sterilization as a condition of employment. So I was never a Bork fan. But he was extremely intelligent. So that meant he was better to move. She's not very intelligent, actually, at all. And so she's someone that can, through pressure, be pushed to change positions. 01:11:03 Speaker 3: So Trump has nominated someone for the Supreme Court who you think is stupid and malleable. 01:11:08 Speaker 1: What?! What is wrong with these people? How can you eat this much shit? This is so much shit. They don't get tired of eating this much shit. I'm tired of watching them eat this much shit. 01:11:23 Speaker 3: Yeah. 01:11:23 Speaker 1: It's all that schadenfreude is fun for a little bit. And now it's just watching two people eat shit. 01:11:29 Speaker 3: Yeah. 01:11:29 Speaker 1: Eventually that the novelty wears off and now you're just grossed out by what's happening. 01:11:35 Speaker 3: You're not wrong. And you want to think like, well, the alternative must be worse. But what's the alternative? I mean, like for them. 01:11:42 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. 01:11:43 Speaker 3: Exactly.

I can't imagine that Barnes or Alex is worried about going to jail or something. I don't know what it could be other than, well, we've made too much of our identity and our position in the market surrounding Trump. And to go back on that would be to go broke. 01:12:01 Speaker 1: It's like a dance with the one what brung ya, you know? 01:12:04 Speaker 3: But if the one what brung ya is making you eat shit sandwiches. 01:12:08 Speaker 1: It's stabbing you in the balls over and over and over again. 01:12:11 Speaker 3: Don't dance with her. You can find another dance part. 01:12:14 Speaker 1: That's probably true. Go back to Ron Paul. He just had a stroke. Yeah. You got to support Ron Paul, but put him on the Supreme Court. 01:12:21 Speaker 3: Fuck it. No, but you can go back to like rallying around him in his time of need. You can make that a big deal. The light of liberty. And, you know, you could do all sorts of shit about that. 01:12:32 Speaker 2: Yeah. 01:12:32 Speaker 3: Just like and God damn it. Why not? Why not? Let this be. I'm done with Trump. Why not? Based on his narratives, the election doesn't matter. The globalists are going to release super bioweapons. Who gives a shit? Politics is meaningless. Who cares? Supreme Court doesn't matter. Let's leave it alone. Trump has fucked us because he nominated somebody who's into forced vaccines. I am a man who has a breaking point, and this is it. Listen, ladies and gentlemen, I believed in him. I was given assurances that all this stuff was Machiavellian games, but I can say at this point, the law of the land is determined by the Supreme Court, and you cannot take lightly who someone nominates to be on the Supreme Court, and if he's going to put somebody in who's in favor of vaccines and forced lockdowns, I say no! 01:13:26 Speaker 4: Or. 01:13:27 Speaker 1: you could get down on your knees, first rub your nose in the shit that you've already eaten, leave a little leftovers there, and then lick Trump's boots over and over and over again until maybe he smiles at you? 01:13:39 Speaker 3: Yep, I guess that's the choice. 01:13:40 Speaker 1: That sounds right. 01:13:41 Speaker 3: Yep. Anyway, this is a bummer. I expected better, but I don't know why. Yeah. 01:13:49 Speaker 4: Yeah. 01:13:50 Speaker 3: Just a bunch of disgraceful dicks. 01:13:52 Speaker 1: It is almost like... I expect this. And yet at the same time, it still surprises me. I expect them to pull out bowls of Trump flavored shit and eat it in front of us because there's no bottom. 01:14:07 Speaker 3: Yeah. 01:14:08 Speaker 1: But at the same time, how can anyone pull out a bowl of Trump flavored shit? and not be not have. 01:14:15 Speaker 3: A problem with it's becoming farcical it. 01:14:17 Speaker 1: Is it is this is a parody yeah continuing to make a an argument for why somebody should not be nominated as though you're saying that it's a great choice is a parody. 01:14:28 Speaker 3: Well but the only the only way to thread that needle and what they're trying to do which is just transparent and sad is uh yeah this is a bad bad nomination from trump but it's not trump's fault i know it's just come on guys and it's entirely. 01:14:41 Speaker 1: Trump's decision because he's so smart and so great but also it's not his fault because he got bamboozled because he's an idiot yeah no. 01:14:48 Speaker 3: Because they told him that she would give him another term because. 01:14:52 Speaker 1: She would steal an election i mean here's okay here's why it's not even parody or why it is parody is because it's unparodiable what he's literally saying is you should vote for this guy because he's an appointing a supreme court justice who is in favor of killing all of us How do you escalate that? 01:15:11 Speaker 3: Who will allow killing all of us if it means Trump having another term? 01:15:15 Speaker 1: Exactly. Like, how do you escalate that? 01:15:18 Speaker 3: Sounds like a good guy. I don't know. But we'll certainly probably find out when we come back for another episode. But until then, we have a website. 01:15:26 Speaker 1: We do have a website. It's knowledgefight.com. 01:15:28 Speaker 2: Yep. 01:15:29 Speaker 3: We are also on Twitter. 01:15:30 Speaker 1: We are on Twitter. It's at knowledge underscore fight and at go to bed Jordan. 01:15:33 Speaker 3: Yep. We're on Facebook. 01:15:34 Speaker 2: We are on Facebook. 01:15:36 Speaker 1: Download, write, leave a review. And if you would like, please donate to a charity or bail fund in your area. 01:15:41 Speaker 3: Or a bear fund. Oh, or a bear fund. 01:15:43 Speaker 2: Absolutely. 01:15:44 Speaker 4: Yep. 01:15:44 Speaker 3: We'll be back. But until then, I'm Neo. I'm Leo. I'm DZX Clark. I am the juiciest ice cube. 01:15:52 Speaker 2: Andy in Kansas, you're on the air. Thanks for holding. 01:15:56 Speaker 1: Hello, Alex. I'm a first-time caller. 01:15:57 Speaker 2: I'm a huge fan. I love your work. 01:15:59 Speaker 3: I love you.