TRANSKRİPT 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:09.679 --> 00:00:11.599
Hello, I will be your host.
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:13.599
My name is Deanna Five.
00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:17.679
I am a registered nurse and healthcare analyst.
00:00:18.399 --> 00:00:19.519
Let's get started.
00:00:20.079 --> 00:00:29.760
The views or opinions expressed in this podcast are for informational purposes only, not intended as legal or professional advice, and may not represent those of Verity Consulting.
00:00:30.079 --> 00:00:41.520
Although we make strong efforts to make sure our information is accurate at the time the podcast episode was recorded, Verity Consulting cannot guarantee that all information in this podcast is always correct, complete, or up to date.
00:00:41.759 --> 00:00:45.119
All information in this podcast is subject to change without notice.
00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:59.280
Today, this episode will be focusing on falls with major injury in long-term care facilities.
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:04.879
And today will be a day where I have a special guest joining me.
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:11.280
And I worked with this young lady for many years in doing healthcare quality compliance reviews.
00:01:11.840 --> 00:01:18.719
And we worked as well doing corporate integrity agreements for the Office of Inspector General.
00:01:19.040 --> 00:01:24.640
So I'm very happy today to introduce Janine Irwood.
00:01:26.879 --> 00:01:27.760
Hi, Dee.
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:29.920
Thank you so much for having me today.
00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:39.680
As Dean mentioned, she and I had the pleasure of working together for a number of years as monitors and my background, I'm a physical therapist by background.
00:01:39.920 --> 00:01:44.640
I have 40 years this year as of experience as a physical therapist.
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:49.519
My work has primarily been in long-term care and inpatient rehab.
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:54.560
Starting in about 2004, I began working in long-term care.
00:01:55.200 --> 00:02:05.680
Both as vice president of rehab and most recently as vice president of strategy and analytics for a large healthcare company that is a multi-state presence.
00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:10.879
Really excited to talk today about falls and fall prevention.
00:02:11.360 --> 00:02:31.120
Now, today we're going to talk about an Office of Inspector General report that came out September of 2025 titled Nursing Homes Failed to Report 43% of falls with major injury and hospitalization among their Medicare enrolled residents.
00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:42.639
So in that OIG report, there's a great deal of detail about the findings when there was a review of falls with major injury.
00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:45.840
Now, it talks about MDS accuracy, of course.
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:48.479
It talks about Medicare, Medicaid claims data.
00:02:48.639 --> 00:02:54.639
So what I'm going to do is ask Janine to talk a little bit about this in a little more detail from her experience.
00:02:55.120 --> 00:03:02.400
So, you know, OIG
Load full transcript
has been very transparent about their interest in quality of care issues.
00:03:02.479 --> 00:03:14.319
And that has only increased over the last several years as they monitor what's going on with long-term care and continue to give recommendations to CMS.
00:03:14.960 --> 00:03:36.240
And when they did this look at claims-based data and compared it to what was being reported in MDSs and found such a disparity, it certainly raised concern on the part of OIG and resulted in these recommendations that are in the report that you just referenced to CMS.
00:03:36.639 --> 00:04:02.800
And then CMS, in their response, certainly agreed that this was of significant concern and noted that they are now using claims data both from Medicare and Medicaid across the continuum of care to validate that the falls with major injury data in the MDS, MDSs that are submitted is accurate.
00:04:03.039 --> 00:04:18.240
And I think that it will be a certainly guidance to surveyors, if not a more aggressive approach in the future with regard to any disparities that they see in the in the comparison of these two data sources.
00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:23.040
So at the facility level, are we doing audits?
00:04:23.360 --> 00:04:27.360
Are we looking at how we are coding?
00:04:27.519 --> 00:04:29.680
Obviously, that's the that's important.
00:04:29.839 --> 00:04:33.040
But before that, what is our fall prevention program?
00:04:33.199 --> 00:04:39.759
What's our systems level review of compliance to prevent falls from the get-go?
00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:44.959
So I want you to talk a little bit more about fall prevention and some best practices that you've seen.
00:04:45.439 --> 00:04:57.120
Well, and and I think that when you think about the leading factors that result in falls with major injury, it's the same leading factors that lead into falls in the first place.
00:04:57.279 --> 00:05:04.639
And unfortunately, in some cases, you know, a fall results in a fracture or significant laceration, et cetera.
00:05:04.879 --> 00:05:11.839
You know, residents' cognitive status, of course, comes to mind as a first step, really safety awareness here.
00:05:12.319 --> 00:05:23.439
If a resident may have, you know, dementia that has resulted in memory loss, but safety awareness may have been retained in the short run.
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:32.160
And on the other hand, however, there may be residents who do well on a BIMS but have really poor safety awareness.
00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:34.399
And then history of falls, of course.
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:41.839
So the more frequently you fall, you know, just statistically speaking, the more likely you are to have an injury.
00:05:42.079 --> 00:05:54.000
And so when we have a resident with a history of falls, the real issue here is how effective are our fall interventions.
00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:57.600
Are those interventions individualized for the resident?
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:05.360
Are we doing a root cause analysis at the time of the
fall to really drill down to see why did the resident fall?
00:06:06.079 --> 00:06:10.560
They didn't fall because they have dementia or because they have Parkinson's disease.
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:14.480
They fell because they were trying to do something.
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:34.399
And so, really, you know, interviewing the resident, understanding what their motivation was for perhaps trying to get up out of the wheelchair or get out of bed really gives us insight into what kind of intervention to put in place to prevent future falls.
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:42.399
So what I hear you saying is putting that fall prevention program in place, a comprehensive fall prevention program.
00:06:42.879 --> 00:06:46.240
So tell me a little bit more about some of the elements of that program.
00:06:46.639 --> 00:06:47.040
Absolutely.
00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:58.560
And so having a falls program within the organization that is structured and replicable has to be sort of a foundation for a successful facility.
00:06:58.879 --> 00:07:20.800
Starting really pre-admission, you know, is there a fall risk assessment that is completed by the interdisciplinary team prior to the resident ever arriving at the facility, recognizing what's really happening with them, what are their diagnoses, why are they in the hospital, have they already had a fall?
00:07:21.040 --> 00:07:30.720
And then implementing interventions prior to the resident ever coming to the building really gets you set off at the right on the right foot.
00:07:31.040 --> 00:07:41.920
And then following that with any significant changes as they occur and continuing to use standardized tools to identify fall risk.
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:57.600
But while standardized tools are great, they don't make up for truly knowing our residents and truly knowing what the motivating factors are for that individual resident as we get to know them in the facility.
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:04.079
And then continuing on with our quarterly assessments or any time that there is a significant change.
00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:17.759
So what you're saying is you've conducted a risk assessment of a resident, you've put a plan in place that you believe is going to help prevent falls, and you reassess and reevaluate.
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:24.319
But let's say, despite all your efforts, the resident continues to have fall experiences.
00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:25.920
What do you do then?
00:08:26.160 --> 00:08:28.000
Take me down that path.
00:08:28.959 --> 00:08:49.519
And and so if I if I kind of walk through a process, I would say that the root cause analysis that's done by the team at the time of the fall is the key step in terms of obviously if no one, if a resident hasn't had any falls, then you're doing a good job, right?
00:08:49.679 --> 00:09:12.559
But it if we have a fall, to pull together an interdisciplinary team that includes the CNA that's caring for the resident, the nurse that is responsible for the care of the resident, any of the nurse leadership that is available, the director of therapy to take a look at the fall circumstance and talk to the resident at the time of the fall.
00:09:12.799 --> 00:09:15.759
Often these are called post-fall huddles.
00:09:16.399 --> 00:09:27.679
And using a standardized tool to always capture the same information during that little gaggle up to see what you know what really happened during this fall is a key.
00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:39.039
And then identifying an immediate intervention that will address whatever the circumstance was, and including that on the care plan, of course, very, very important.
00:09:39.919 --> 00:10:00.000
Then next step being whenever the interdisciplinary team has their next meeting, whether that's at the end of the day or the beginning of the next day, that a more in-depth root cause analysis is reviewed and identifying what were the factors that were involved in this fall.
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:06.480
During that process, reviewing the entire care plan related to falls.
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:10.159
So let's say that this is a resident that's been with us for three years.
00:10:10.320 --> 00:10:13.120
And during that three years, they've had multiple falls.
00:10:13.279 --> 00:10:24.559
Not only looking at this fall, but looking for commonalities across the most recent falls that the person has had, often will identify additional information that one fall might not.
00:10:24.799 --> 00:10:31.120
And then upgate updating the care plan again truly with an intro an individualized intervention.
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:54.080
So for example, if a resident was attempting to get out of bed into the wheelchair, and they tell you that they were, you know, they wanted to get up and their feet slid out from under them, we wouldn't put in an intervention that related to bathroom safety, right?
00:10:54.159 --> 00:11:00.639
We we have to drill down to what really happened and identify an intervention that relates to that specific issue.
00:11:01.200 --> 00:11:09.120
Often we also see that in care plans if a resident has been with us for a long time and if they have fallen multiple times.
00:11:10.240 --> 00:11:13.759
Our fall prevention care plan might be pages long.
00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:29.759
And so if that's the case and you're the direct care provider for that resident, it's difficult to sift through all of the interventions that are listed on the care plan to identify truly what you should be doing in the care of the resident to keep them safe.
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:49.840
And so winnowing your care plan to interventions that are truly individualized and proven to be effective, and don't say, you know, sort of generic items that we do for all of our residents really results in a much more effective care plan.
00:11:50.320 --> 00:11:58.080
So would you say getting this information to direct care staff, the team, so they know what it is we need to do?
00:11:58.720 --> 00:11:59.840
Absolutely.
00:12:00.799 --> 00:12:20.320
And and you know, when when we are together as an IDT and we are discussing and we've come up with a great new intervention and we're super excited about it, and we put it in the care plan, if we then all walk away and nothing else is done, how does the direct care provider know what it is that they're supposed to do that's new and different?
00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:37.759
And so a method for communication real time that might be a you know post-morning clinical meeting, you know, gaggle up with the direct care staff on the unit where the fall occurred, in which we talk about Mrs.
00:12:37.840 --> 00:12:43.440
Jones had a fall, this was the circumstance, and here's the intervention we would like to put in place.
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:55.279
And then that that communication goes shift to shift on the go forward so that it's communicated directly, not just via the care plan, but also in a in a you know face-to-face way.
00:12:56.240 --> 00:13:10.240
So, you know, you talked a little bit about huddles or uh manners by which the staff come together and talk about here's our plan, here's how we're going to keep this resident from falling, certainly from having a major fall.
00:13:11.039 --> 00:13:26.799
And we know that it's important for the interdisciplinary team to talk, keep each other updated, any changes that is occurring with the resident, any early changes that could lead to their falls, certainly a major fall.
00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:28.399
So talk a little bit about that.
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:32.480
So we want to we want to avoid falls, we do not want any further incidents.
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:34.480
So talk a little bit about that.
00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:52.320
And and to your point there, you know, then three or four days later, most facilities have something that they would call resident review, incident review, something like that, and in which once a week they review residents that have had major changes.
00:13:52.559 --> 00:14:18.080
And so another recommendation then would be for any resident that's fallen in the last seven days since your last resident review meeting to go back and look at the intervention that was put in place after the most recent fall, and then discuss whether that intervention has been effective in the last few days and pulling in the direct care staff who directly treat care for the resident, the CNAs, and saying, What do you think?
00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:19.120
Is this working?
00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:21.679
Was this intervention effective?
00:14:21.919 --> 00:14:23.360
Should we try something else?
00:14:23.600 --> 00:14:27.679
And then, of course, documenting that discussion, right, would be an important piece.
00:14:28.399 --> 00:14:32.080
Of course, being a therapist, I have to throw in the therapy screen.
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:40.000
So most facilities that I have worked with over the years that have really effective fall prevention programs.
00:14:40.320 --> 00:14:50.960
Their therapy team is highly engaged in all things fall prevention, both with regard to actual therapy treatment, resident equipment, positioning, et cetera.
00:14:51.279 --> 00:15:02.000
And that therapy screening process after a fall will take a look at whether there has been a change in independence with regard to mobility.
00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:16.879
And if so, then therapy, you know, seeks evaluate and treat orders and initiates treatment to try to address any change in mobility and move that person back up to their level of prior functioning.
00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:37.679
You know, if I if I would think about facilities that I have worked with over the years that have really struggled with high fall rates, an approach we used as monitors very frequently was something of a gap analysis in which we looked at the falls program of the facility.
00:15:38.000 --> 00:15:43.360
And typically every facility across the country would have a fall prevention program.
00:15:43.840 --> 00:15:56.159
And then we would say, okay, you know, there's 12 steps in this program, and then assess whether the individual facility was effectively using all of those steps.
00:15:56.320 --> 00:16:07.519
And if a gap was identified, then we would work with the facility to identify what the roadblocks are to implementing that missed step.
00:16:08.080 --> 00:16:11.600
And often we would see significant improvements involved.
00:16:12.000 --> 00:16:21.519
In my experience as a monitor, I have worked with organizations to conduct gap analysis exercises to look at resident falls.
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:26.960
And looking at that is what you're doing is you're getting the policy and procedure out.
00:16:27.200 --> 00:16:31.440
That once you once you review that, are there any gaps in what we were supposed to do?
00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:32.480
What did we not do?
00:16:32.639 --> 00:16:34.320
That's identifying the gap.
00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:35.679
And from there you go.
00:16:35.919 --> 00:16:37.919
I had some great experiences doing that.
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:43.360
And one thing I want to emphasize here is it's really important to get key stakeholders involved.
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:59.679
Make sure that folks who know the residents and know what's going on with the residents on a day-to-day basis, all shifts, weekends, et cetera, that they are brought to the table to provide feedback on what their view is as to contributing factors for falls.
00:16:59.840 --> 00:17:01.519
So it's real important, key stakeholders.
00:17:01.840 --> 00:17:08.240
Well, you nicely outlined some of the steps that go into root cause analysis, gap analysis.
00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:09.279
What else are you doing?
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:10.720
Can you tell us a little bit more?
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:22.559
Some work that I'm doing right now in my company relates to really residents who have the unfortunate circumstance of having repeated falls over and over again.
00:17:23.039 --> 00:17:37.680
And so we're doing some work with regard to more of a deep dive analysis across falls in the same resident, looking at things like, you know, what are the diagnoses that this resident has?
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:49.279
What are if we look at the circumstance or the events occurred in the in the last, you know, let's say five falls, what are the commonalities?
00:17:49.599 --> 00:17:54.480
Time of day, location, you know, what is the resident saying?
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:56.960
And then looking at the BIMs.
00:17:57.359 --> 00:18:02.319
Is the resident able to remember these safety instructions that we give them?
00:18:02.559 --> 00:18:05.200
If not, what else do we need to be doing?
00:18:05.519 --> 00:18:20.880
Looking at the most recent therapy documentation and identifying the mobility status at the time of discharge, comparing that to the mobility status that we're seeing now, and asking for therapy referrals, if indeed we're seeing a decline.
00:18:21.599 --> 00:18:34.400
Reviewing care plan interventions to ensure that the interventions that are listed in the care plan are current, are effective, and are in place.
00:18:35.359 --> 00:18:43.359
So if the facility has a customer service rounding process, you know, we call it concierge rounds.
00:18:43.759 --> 00:18:46.079
Sometimes they're called guardian angel rounds.
00:18:47.279 --> 00:18:57.440
Is that concierge or guardian angel taking a look at safety every time they go into that resident room to see if the plant care planned interventions are in place?
00:18:58.559 --> 00:19:01.759
Next up, what medications is the resident on?
00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:13.519
Are they on a number of medications that are known to have potential side effects of dizziness, faintness, you know, uh vertigo, et cetera?
00:19:13.759 --> 00:19:22.480
Is there an opportunity for gradual dose reductions on psychoactive meds, which often result in issues with falls?
00:19:23.519 --> 00:19:37.200
Looking at provider notes and provider orders, not just of the direct care, sorry, the medical director or physician caring for the resident, but any consultations, perhaps psych notes, et cetera.
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:51.599
And then based on that, what are we seeing as the commonalities across all of these pieces of data that may give us insight into what else might we be able to do to prevent future falls with the same resident?
00:19:53.359 --> 00:19:55.279
And this is certainly a time commitment.
00:19:55.359 --> 00:20:04.720
I mean, you're you're bringing folks together to start talking about what we can do to prevent falls, certainly major falls.
00:20:05.119 --> 00:20:08.720
It is a commitment, but it's well worth it because we're going to protect the resident.
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:16.000
So we've talked about fall, fall prevention, uh avoiding major injuries.
00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:29.519
I want to go back again to the OIG, the CMS initiative to really examine more closely MDS accuracy and uh and Medicaid
Medicare claims.
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:32.960
So come back to that and talk a little bit more about that.
00:20:33.680 --> 00:20:34.319
Certainly.
00:20:34.480 --> 00:20:58.319
And and you know, when you take a look at OIG guidance for long-term care in terms of internal audit and the kinds of things that we should be monitoring, one of the key elements is MBS accuracy, whether that is either for Medicare residents, but also truly for your Medicaid residents and your managed care residents as well.
00:20:58.559 --> 00:21:27.200
And so developing a standardized tool that you can use to do that auditing and then reporting that, those results to your compliance committee, as well as if there are errors in your MDSs, that you are modifying the MDSs to correct the errors, which may result in decreased reimbursement or may result in increased reimbursement based upon the timing of your audits.
00:21:27.680 --> 00:21:47.839
But a newer factor that OIG has really been focused on recently has been accuracy of MDS data as it relates to those factors that are included in quality measures and any quality reporting that results in changes to reimbursement.
00:21:48.160 --> 00:21:59.759
And so things like accuracy of if a resident has had a major injury due to a fall, is that coded correctly on an MDS is a perfect example of something that might.
00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:07.759
Be on your audit tool to ensure that you are aware of the accuracy of your MDSs in an individual facility or across a company.
00:22:08.319 --> 00:22:16.160
So, Janine, we know that the oversight, the review that will be conducted will have some far-reaching implications.
00:22:16.400 --> 00:22:18.319
You want to talk a little bit about that?
00:22:19.440 --> 00:22:20.079
Absolutely.
00:22:20.319 --> 00:22:20.720
Absolutely.
00:22:20.960 --> 00:22:29.920
And you know, one other thought related to OIG's focus and ultimately CMS's focus relates to special focus facilities.
00:22:30.079 --> 00:22:52.960
And so, you know, the fall prevalence of falls being a new component of determination of which facilities will become special focus facilities across the country, it just adds even more emphasis on the importance of fall prevention and the importance of really understanding what the gaps are in your falls programs and how to better prevent falls.
00:22:53.440 --> 00:23:08.319
Well, I think we have really conducted a pretty comprehensive review of the discussion related to falls with major injury, the implications indicated by the OIG and the CMS and where things are going to go.
00:23:08.559 --> 00:23:15.759
It's been great having you come in and share with me some of this information, and I hope to have you come back.
00:23:15.920 --> 00:23:22.400
There are a few more topics that I know you'll be able to help us develop and have some good discussion.
00:23:22.559 --> 00:23:24.079
Thank you again, Janine.
00:23:25.359 --> 00:23:26.720
I would love it, Dee.
00:23:28.000 --> 00:23:29.200
Thank you for listening.
00:23:29.440 --> 00:23:31.519
Your time is appreciated.
00:23:31.759 --> 00:23:38.640
We hope you enjoyed this episode of Vital Compliance Insights and found this to be informative.
00:23:39.359 --> 00:23:51.839
Please feel free to reach out to Verity Consulting at VerityTeam.com if you'd like further assistance with your healthcare compliance needs.
00:23:52.559 --> 00:23:55.200
Stay tuned for the next episode.