TRANSKRİPT 🔗
00:00:00
Speaker 1: Stephen Baker discovers buried footage of Brian Cole walking in D.C. in some other place than the pipe bomb. Bomber was planning pipe bombs. It feels and seems like Iran is about to blow off again.
00:00:17
Speaker 2: And guess what?
00:00:20
Speaker 1: Early voting has started, so the October surprises are flowing like wine.
00:00:26
Speaker 2: All today on The David Rutherford Show. Welcome back to the show, everybody. I am your host, David Rutt Rutherford.
00:00:35
Speaker 1: And man, I'll tell you what, it has been a wild ride for the past week. And as Jordy and I were deciding what we were going to do next, he hit me up and he's like, hey, Rutt, no way. Let's do a new show because there's so much stuff going on that some of this stuff needs a little context and it needs a little needs a little rut rant on it. So to appease my good friend and colleague, Mr. Jordy Long, here I am. So let's jump right in, all right? Oh, and before we do, Like, subscribe, leave a comment. A five-star rating has a huge thing. And to all those fans out there that have been watching, we have had the largest month in views and impressions that we've ever had. So we just can't thank you all enough. We love you, and we hope you're enjoying the show.
00:01:31
Speaker 2: All right.
00:01:32
Speaker 1: So Steve Baker, formerly of The Blaze, has been on the scent of the January 6th, I almost said January shits, which is totally what happened. But on the January 6th fiasco, whether it was not getting all the footage, whether it was inside personnel being on the ground, Antifa people dressed up as MAGA, the 1,400 indictments of red-blooded Americans for basically just protesting all the way to what I think is the most fascinating aspect of the entire thing, other than the fact that the 2020 elections were stolen, was the January 6th pipe bomber. Now, if you're not familiar, there was footage from multiple places around DC where this individual placed pipe bombs at DNC headquarters, and I'm pretty sure the RNC headquarters, or in and around mostly the DNC headquarters. And what made it so crazy was the following day, apparently, uh, Kamala Harris was at the end heads headquarters while these pipe, this, these pipe bomb or these devices.
00:02:45
Speaker 2: Were in and around the area.
00:02:47
Speaker 1: Now, Steve Baker has been tracking this down like a dog on a bone, man.
00:02:52
Speaker 2: And this guy is really amazing.
00:02:54
Speaker 1: And the thing that if you're not paying too much attention, that his first initial ones was, um, Because remember, nothing happened on this case for years and years and years. In fact, what was so unique about it was just how much coverage it got from both Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, two people who ended up taking over.
00:03:18
Speaker 2: At the FBI.
00:03:19
Speaker 1: And they certainly had time and opportunity to get in there and do all the research figured out, see what all leads, release all the footage, do
Load full transcript
all the things they did, which doesn't seem to have happened. But this guy, Steve Baker, he stuck on this thing and eventually discovered what he thought was through expert gait analysis that the individual who basically a let know, he said the individual who he alleges.
00:03:47
Speaker 2: Was responsible for this.
00:03:48
Speaker 1: And this was always also in conjunction with, there's a certain cellular net that police officers, off-duty cops, security personnel, that they.
00:04:00
Speaker 2: Use, right?
00:04:01
Speaker 1: And this service, this system pinged multiple times in the exact area where this alleged pipe bomber was seen and around the area. So what he did through gate analysis and this this pinging of the cell coverage is he concluded or alleges that a, uh, Capitol police officer named Shawnee Kirk Kirk off, um, was the person who was the pipe bomber because of the way she walks. And then he analyzed it, did all this and, you know, certain, uh, AI gate analysis was like, you know, plus 88% or something like that, something high. Um, and, um, oh no, it was, uh, 94%, uh, and a 98 analyst visual assessment.
00:04:53
Speaker 2: Right.
00:04:54
Speaker 1: Uh, so when this came out, all hell break loose, but nothing ever happened. This person was questioned and then cleared, you know, and then apparently, allegedly this person is no longer at the Capitol police, but now works in my old unit or a version of my old unit at GRS at.
00:05:11
Speaker 2: The central intelligence agency.
00:05:12
Speaker 3: So.
00:05:14
Speaker 2: I find that's interesting.
00:05:15
Speaker 1: Well, the most recent video that came out, well, hold on, let me back up. Well, right when he released these allegations about this police officer, there was an immediate rest of a, how old was Brian Cole, was arrested. And Brian is a young man in his 20s who has severe autism. And based on a testimony, which he had, he conducted by himself, not with his parents who are his caretakers by himself with officers, FBI agents for hours and hours and hours on end. And the fact that he had some receipts for some of the components that were in his car around him. And the fact that, you know, he was relatively the same size and all this. and that he'd had a pair of the same shoes that a pipe bomber had had, they arrested this guy and they've got him in custody. Well, nobody who's been following Baker's news reporting on this believes anything they say. And the most recent thing that Baker released is this video. So, Jordy, go ahead and play this thing for our people.
00:06:40
Speaker 2: So it says, Brian Cole... And it points to his location.
00:06:44
Speaker 1: Then it says January 6th pipe bomber is here. Then it flashes to a video at 7.57.04 p.m. on that same night of Brian Cole walking. Then it shows another video at the same time of the January 6th pipe bomber walking in another location closer to where these bombs were dropped. And Brian's about a mile plus away from this
person. And so those of you who are watching on video, you can see, like, these are the same times Brian Cole is nowhere near where the pipe bombs were dropped. So based on this evidence and based on what Baker has released now by digging through all of the available footage, and I think he got a couple FOIA requests, so what he believes is conclusive evidence is that Brian Cole was in DC, yes, at the time of but the video of him walking where he was versus the video of the pipe bomber walking where they were conclusively proves it is impossible that Brian Cole was.
00:07:51
Speaker 2: The pipe bomber.
00:07:52
Speaker 1: Now, you know, this is pretty, you know, if, if this seems, if this comes out, this will absolutely just really continue to destroy the credibility of the FBI and the credibility of cash Patel. Uh, I certainly believe if you pay attention to anybody on X that Dan Bongino and his reputation took a pretty huge hit as a result of the fact of his stance on the Epstein files on this, uh, and a whole slew of other things that basically he had been talking about for years on end, Russiagate, the whole thing that essentially never came to fruition.
00:08:32
Speaker 2: Nothing ever happened. And he, uh, bailed after about a year in office.
00:08:36
Speaker 1: So, Um, you know, in my mind, when I think about this and I think about how easy it would for the FBI to regain some credibility, to come out and say, yep, absolutely. This video conclusively proves it.
00:08:51
Speaker 2: You know what?
00:08:52
Speaker 1: We're he's out. We're going to get to the bottom of this. We're sorry. We're sorry to them. Like just that admission of guilt. If indeed this video does prove that, that Brian Cole was not the pipe bomber, man. leading into the midterms right now, you need some truth to come out. You need this administration to basically say, Hey, guess what? We made a mistake and we're going to correct it. And we're going to get the bottom of it. And we can't thank you enough so much. That would actually do better than kind of the other things that they're trying to do to double down on, their importance and what they're able, been able to accomplish in their, you know, two years, essentially they've been in office. So, you know, I always think about when I watch stuff like this, I first and foremost, who's the person reporting on it. And Steve Baker certainly appears to be credible. I've watched probably about 10 interviews with him since he's been doing this. He's, he's been indicted himself and tried to take the, take into jail under the Biden administration. You know, so like the guy is, is in my mind, pretty legit. One of the most thorough investigators I've ever seen. And as I go through his analysis, his research and what I'm watching with my own eyes, and the interviews I've heard with Brian Cole's family, his parents, I tell you what, this is pretty damning evidence against the FBI. Now, as you just continue to have this idea that the FBI has pretty much been, well, fudging stuff since J. Edgar Hoover's foundation and the blackmail they had him on as a cross-dressing agent kind of homosexual pedophile in cases. But then he used the same thing with the people he would blackmail as well. But he stayed in office for like 40 years. And he was what built the foundation. Now, I will say there's been some other incredible work done at the FBI.
00:11:02
Speaker 2: There's no doubt.
00:11:02
Speaker 1: I know a lot of bureau guys myself, really phenomenal human beings. But when you think about all the different stuff we found out about the Oklahoma City bombings recently, Waco, 9-11, and following these terrorists from Indonesia into California, down in South Florida, and doing fight plans, all the way up through and now us dealing with the J6 insurrection, in quotations, right? And how that all was handled and what Chris Wray said and all the lies he said on testifying on Congress.
00:11:38
Speaker 2: Man, they could use a dub right now. They could really use a dub.
00:11:42
Speaker 1: And I'm here to tell you, you know, and this is the motivational rut stepping in just so you know, and I want you to just lean in, put your ear right up against the little speaker there or push your little ear plug in deeper while you're out there on your elliptical or doing your morning walk or jog, listening to my voice. Here's the deal. When you tell the truth, people seem.
00:12:05
Speaker 2: To like you better. I don't know.
00:12:07
Speaker 1: I might be some new profound thing, but the, what I've always learned is that when you tell the truth and you admit your mistakes and you act with some grace and humility, guess what? You seem to get a lot more points than trying to bring down, you know, a 20 something.
00:12:25
Speaker 2: Year old autistic kid for pipe bombs.
00:12:29
Speaker 1: I don't know about you, but somehow those two doesn't seem like they're compatible, right? Let's bring down an autistic kid or let's tell the truth.
00:12:41
Speaker 2: I don't know. Could work. I don't know. Let's try.
00:12:44
Speaker 1: Obviously, we haven't seen a lot of that from politicians over the last, I don't know, ever, but I believe that that's the secret.
00:12:51
Speaker 2: So don't pay attention to what they do.
00:12:54
Speaker 1: You just live a life of honesty, and I promise you it'll be hard. But at the end of the day, people will actually trust you, unlike we do with what?
00:13:04
Speaker 2: The federal government.
00:13:05
Speaker 1: All right.
00:13:07
Speaker 2: Next story.
00:13:08
Speaker 1: And this is a doozy. And I've been covering kind of lead-ups to the midterms. I've been covering a ton of the stuff in Iran and a ton of voting stuff as everybody who pays attention to me.
00:13:19
Speaker 2: And I'm fascinated by it. I really am.
00:13:21
Speaker 1: I think it's one of those things in life that it's very easy to just throw your hands up in the air and be like, you know what?
00:13:29
Speaker 2: I'm sick of the negativity. I'm sick of all the lying and the corruption. Nothing's going to change. And you know, you're probably right.
00:13:38
Speaker 1: We're all probably just going to have to sit back and suck on it, but it's entertainment for me.
00:13:44
Speaker 2: I enjoy it.
00:13:45
Speaker 1: I love watching all this stuff. Ask Jordy, like he'll text me in some random time. And there I am trying to figure out what's hilarious online or what kind of story is, well, this.
00:13:58
Speaker 2: One I'm talking about.
00:13:59
Speaker 1: I'm not exactly, it's not exactly hilarious in any way, shape or form. And so this is a serious one and I want to bring a serious undertone. We're leading up to the midterms. Gas prices are high. In fact, we've got a diagram we're going to show you where bent crude is at, $ 118 today. We know that talks have continuously broken down in the Middle East. Kushner and Witkoff are not making any progress. We know there's been an uptick in attacks from the Houthis into Saudi Arabia.
00:14:38
Speaker 2: And as a result of all.
00:14:39
Speaker 1: This and some of what the rhetoric of Trump, Netanyahu, and also what the Iranian officials are putting out, This thing is not going to end anytime soon. In fact, all the rumblings and many of the reportings from NBC or the Wall Street Journal or New York Times or AP or Reuters or Al Jazeera or whatever you want. And then a whole slew of online, you know, small independent media companies are pretty much reporting that Trump just before the midterms is.
00:15:13
Speaker 2: Going to light Iran up. like an old pinball machine, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
00:15:21
Speaker 1: And people are going, well, why the hell would you do that? Now there's a whole other contingency that is saying, no, no, no, no, that's not what Trump's saying. He's saying, we're going to wait until after the midterms, right? We're going to wait until after the midterms in order to give Trump, you know, I ran more time. We're going to negotiate. We're going to come to fruition. Uh, Right. And even though nobody's really quite sure what's all on the table, you know, there there there's a different mentality, it seems, from multiple different areas. So. What I want to show is trying to go through these things a little bit to give it some more context to help you kind of formulate your own opinion.
00:16:03
Speaker 2: All right. Thanks, everybody, for paying attention to this episode.
00:16:06
Speaker 1: I hate to interrupt, but I have to give credit where credit is due. And that's to our number one sponsor, Black Rifle Coffee. They finally came out. And they named a coffee after me. And this is the rut coffee right there. And so if you know anything about me and instructor rut, you know who I am and what, and they've been so brilliant to depict me as some, you know, massive, beautiful elk with like a 26 million point reputation. you know, rack up there in this beautiful crown.
00:16:40
Speaker 2: So I, you know, I, if, if you haven't.
00:16:43
Speaker 1: Tried rut coffee yet, which is named after me for sure, 100%.
00:16:47
Speaker 2: And thanks, BRCC. I really appreciate the tribute there to old ruddy rut, right?
00:16:54
Speaker 1: Go out there, head over to black rifle coffee, head over to the web website, look up rut. And, uh, as you check out, just, uh, you know, put in, uh, frog logic to zero and you get your discount code on there for me. This is what Kings drink right here. Cause that's why it's called rut coffee. So thank you very much. Appreciate it boys. Let's get back to the show. First one we're going to start with is we're going to start with an ambassador overseas who had a sit down with Mara Nawal. And I really found what he was fascinating because the way he described all of this was very articulate. It was I think he was very measured in his words, but it sounded like he was pretty open with what he was suggesting.
00:17:39
Speaker 2: So go ahead, Jordy, play that clip for us.
00:17:42
Speaker 3: The likelihood that we'll see strikes this weekend. Again, I know you don't have the answer. But as the Muneer was in Iran, the Qataris, the Pakistanis are trying everything they can to find a middle ground between both sides. What is the end game and what is the disagreement? And are we at a position where a deal is looking less and less likely as time goes by?
00:18:09
Speaker 4: So, and I'll give you the most candid answer that I can because I'm just, I'm a facilitator of policy.
00:18:14
Speaker 5: I'm not, the creator of policy, President Trump and Congress.
00:18:18
Speaker 2: It ain't me.
00:18:18
Speaker 5: It's not my fault. We'll decide what that policy is. Could there be a strike this weekend? Absolutely.
00:18:28
Speaker 4: The president has been clear. I'm giving you American policy. The president is very clear. He's open and available and accessible to a deal. And we've been at the table.
00:18:42
Speaker 5: For decades.
00:18:45
Speaker 4: Months and months and months, starting with what's clear is the elimination of the imminent threat of nuclear.
00:18:53
Speaker 5: I think we've established that everybody agrees pretty.
00:18:55
Speaker 4: Much that that particular threat has gone. Now the nuclear proliferation and where we go with enrichment and all those things are, are details that the punctuation and the chapters.
00:19:04
Speaker 2: Pause that for me real quick, Jordy. I just want to just step in.
00:19:07
Speaker 1: So this guy is saying it is clear that, That the nuclear proliferate, like the nuclear capability, the imminent nuclear threat is gone. So that's a real critical thing to understand. The imminent nuclear threat is gone, right? So that I want you to just keep that in the back of your little donut back there.
00:19:28
Speaker 2: All right, go ahead.
00:19:30
Speaker 4: Then along the way, we end up with the Straits of Honolulu being another hostage point of saying,
okay, now we're at another place. Where if we're in a bargain, what are we in a bargain for? Stop that.
00:19:44
Speaker 1: Stop that too. I just, I got to point this. So again, it's language. You always got to hear the language, right?
00:19:49
Speaker 5: So this.
00:19:50
Speaker 1: Guy is calling the body of water, the Strait of Hormuz, which because of our actions is now a hostage. Yeah. And, and remember, like we don't negotiate with hostage takers, right? But this body of water is now a hostage.
00:20:11
Speaker 2: All right. So just listen to the language. Okay.
00:20:13
Speaker 6: Check.
00:20:13
Speaker 4: Again, for unfreezing assets, releasing sanctions, um, no more kinetic engagement, uh, Sorry, press.
00:20:23
Speaker 2: Press, press pause.
00:20:24
Speaker 1: Now, now releasing sanction is a big deal because you have to understand if you haven't been paying attention, we just unlocked a truckload of sanctions from the Russians up in the Ukraine war.
00:20:36
Speaker 3: Why?
00:20:36
Speaker 1: Because diesel is going through the fricking roof and it's going to collapse economy. It's already driven inflation up a little bit more, all gas, all prices, and pretty much everything is higher because guess what? Because the trucking company is not going to pay for the additional costs from the Straits of Hormuz being taken hostage, right?
00:20:55
Speaker 2: They're going to make you pay for it. The American, the American consumer, because pretty much.
00:21:00
Speaker 1: Everything you buy from your coffee cups to your coffee to, you know, your flashbang grenade, probably not that, but your water, whatever it is like, you know, that comes through a truck to your local distribution center. And guess what? Prices, all trucks and everything you get and you use runs on diesel. And so we lifted sanctions because, to have president Trump deliver more diesel. Well, about enough diesel to have for like a couple of days or a week. Well, that was awesome, but it was an unlimited, you know, sanction release. Well, he said, you know, late 27 or something like that. So now this guy is floating out the idea like, Hey, guess what? Come to the table and we'll get some sanctions for Iran. All right.
00:21:44
Speaker 2: We haven't heard the sanctions talk in quite a while. Go ahead.
00:21:49
Speaker 4: The, the needed help to Israel, our ally. What's her commitment to them? What's that engagement like?
00:21:57
Speaker 1: And pause again, like a component of the deal, right?
00:22:04
Speaker 2: And you got to listen to this champ, right?
00:22:06
Speaker 1: A component of deal-making obviously is going to be right as, as Kushner and Witkoff are sitting there and Trump's in their earpiece, you know, while he's, you know, typing out crazy stuff about Vivek Waswami on true social, right? He's sitting there and he's calling, you know, Hey man, Hey, Hey, hold on, hold on before you say anything. Hey BB, Hey BB, does this sound like a deal?
00:22:35
Speaker 2: Is this good to go?
00:22:37
Speaker 1: And we'll get to BB in a second. Cause he's had some interesting statements lately, but so, so right. Let's go through it. I hate, A strike is imminent or possibly in a minute. Uh, we're gonna, uh, we're basically, we realized you were considering you a hostage taker. We, we, we acknowledge that all this other stuff that we just frivolously toss around, like Iran can't have a nuclear weapon.
00:23:04
Speaker 2: Like what's his name?
00:23:05
Speaker 1: Senator Scott from, you know, the great state of Florida, like his canned responses, everything. We will not let Iran have a nuclear weapon. Well, the guy just said it's over, so stop saying that shit, right? But he won't, knowing well. It's this imminent threat, right? The next four weeks, the next four years, the next four minutes, right? All right, but then he was like, all right, well, we'll talk about enrichment, but it'll involve sanctions, but we got to converse with Israel and go.
00:23:32
Speaker 5: All right.
00:23:33
Speaker 4: Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff have done an amazing job, along with J.D. Vance's help, and always... Secretary Rubio is an amazing set of hands. But the expectation on the other side of having.
00:23:47
Speaker 5: An event.
00:23:49
Speaker 4: Obviously is not what Iran has wanted and not what they're doing. And I've said and I get in trouble for this, but it's for sure. President Trump has great respect for the Iranian civilization.
00:24:03
Speaker 5: It's 3,000 years old.
00:24:04
Speaker 2: All right, stop that.
00:24:05
Speaker 1: I got to just, I just got to, I got to evaluate this, right?
00:24:09
Speaker 2: This is a big one.
00:24:10
Speaker 1: Like this is where, like this guy was told to go out there and start following the balls of the Iranian leadership a little bit, right? And he starts off by saying, President Trump has profound respect for the Persian people and civilizations. But we also remember a bit of a true social post that happened about six to eight months ago during Easter, which was interesting, where Trump basically said, we're going to wipe the entire place off the map, right? So it's nice to hear we've kind of tempered that, hey, we're going to turn Iran into glass.
00:24:45
Speaker 2: That's good.
00:24:45
Speaker 7: All right, go.
00:24:48
Speaker 4: It's some of the most amazing poetry, some of the most amazing art, some of the most amazing people.
00:24:54
Speaker 5: The adversary is the IRGC.
00:24:56
Speaker 4: Since 1979, this harsh entity that was created, that's at odds with Israel and at odds with us. The Iranian people themselves are not, can be in this fabric. We've been through 10 wars. We've seen what happened.
00:25:13
Speaker 5: The Byzantine- Hold on, press pause on that.
00:25:16
Speaker 1: So he talks about these 10 wars, and I found this was really fascinating. And people are like, well, we've been through Been through 10 wars. What 10 wars is he talking about, right? And I
think he's going back to Byzantine, that whole time frame and all that. But the wars that I really kind of care about, obviously, in my mind, as it relates to the Persian people and Iran, basically starts in World War I, certainly World War II, post-World War II, right? It starts with us helping overthrow the leader in 1953.
00:25:54
Speaker 2: Propping up, right. The former shake, right.
00:25:57
Speaker 1: And then I are, you know, that fell and then are funding both sides of the Iran Iraq war, right. For, you know, so those weapons sales through Israel to help demolish them against each other with Saddam Hussein and the, I told back in the day called Maney, right. And the, and the collapse of, of that relationship. And we were feeding both sides of that to also, you could argue that, uh, I think what they want to believe is that the.
00:26:28
Speaker 2: Hezbollah bombing of the– it wasn't Hezbollah.
00:26:31
Speaker 1: It was another terrorist group that bombed the Marine barracks in 1983. You got to also look at the Israel-Lebanon conflict leading up to that. Then you've got obviously the hostages they took out of Pakistan in Iranian hostage crisis in 1980. Then, you know, there's a lot of people say, well, they've been killing Americans since the GWAT. And yeah, something like 607 American soldiers were killed as a result of our involvement in the GWAT, which is kind of interesting because we basically waged war and put our presence on their border and began, you know, killing a bunch of people. And then the latest one, which is kind of interesting to me that, you know, we went in and we basically assassinated the Pope of Shia Islam, which was their supreme leader, and all of his family and kids and grandkids and all of the top leaders, and then continued to assassinate top leaders as we were trying to engage in, you know, negotiations with them. So, you know, yeah, they're... warring people and you could probably go back to you know bc times and all that and look at ancient samaria and assyria and you know through that whole the ottoman empire certainly there was a role in persia and all that but man modern times is really i think what we need to do and in the real I think questions emerged and originated post-World War II as Russia, Britain, and the USSR basically carved up the world at that point. And I think that's where you really got to go back. And maybe we'll do a show on that in the future. But all right, go ahead and finish what he said.
00:28:23
Speaker 4: It's assassinate war was 125 years.
00:28:27
Speaker 5: What happened?
00:28:27
Speaker 4: They wore each other out and finally Arabs walked in and just took it. So the Iranian notion of negotiating in a win is very different than our notion of negotiating in a win.
00:28:38
Speaker 5: But the president has been very clear. All right, stop that one.
00:28:44
Speaker 1: So, you know, I always love when people– I always love when fucking ambassadors, in particular Trump's ambassadors, they seem to be– a unique breed, but all presidents appoint.
00:29:03
Speaker 2: Business owners, business leaders, donors.
00:29:06
Speaker 1: Hell, we had Don Jr. 's ex-wife who's in the news. She's going to come out with a tell-all book unless they pay her off. She basically was in Greece doing a pay-for-play every day.
00:29:18
Speaker 2: But ambassadors are ambassadors, right?
00:29:20
Speaker 1: And so now we're getting this history lesson on how significantly diplomatic the United States is And.
00:29:28
Speaker 2: All you got to do, man, is just go back from.
00:29:32
Speaker 1: I think Korea, the 38th parallel was the actual last time we used diplomacy to end a conflict. in any real meaningful way. Certainly didn't happen in Vietnam. Certainly didn't happen in any of the other conflicts that we've been involved in. Certainly didn't happen in Japan.
00:29:51
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Man, that diplomacy is... Some great diplomacy in Japan, for sure. Yeah, yeah.
00:29:57
Speaker 1: And we just recently saw that mog guy from the Fabian Society.
00:30:02
Speaker 2: Say, that was morally justified for annihilating half a million women and civilians, women and kids in Japan.
00:30:13
Speaker 1: Anyways, I just find it interesting that we hold the high ground on diplomacy from this guy.
00:30:22
Speaker 4: Steve Woodcroft's phone number is right here. You call me and I want to do something on a peaceful basis. I want to create a process that eventually brings the temperatures down. But if we don't, and if you keep threatening the world, our allies, the Gulf, there will be a consequence. The consequence won't be regime change. The United States, the President of the United States has said he's not interested in regime change. He's interested in rebalancing so that there's no hostages, there's no threats, and the world can calm down and ensure what's there. The problem with regime change always is what's the day-two scenario? So I think it's open for dialogue. The problem is with whom is the dialogue?
00:31:16
Speaker 1: Yeah, with whom's the dialogue? Because we murdered everybody that's not a radical. And now the radicals are in charge, especially at the IRGC. So again, man, I appreciate these guys getting on. I commend them for trying to sling the slop they're slinging. If you're an ambassador and that's what your commander in chief wants you to do, that's what you do.
00:31:37
Speaker 2: And I thought he was graceful. I thought he was articulate.
00:31:41
Speaker 1: But again, the underlying components of of what he's really saying is, you know, is pretty interesting. And, you know, the idea, I mean, all you got to do is just like look through some of the rhetoric that Trump and that Yahoo have basically been saying, right? And so it says that, you know, that guy, Ambassador Barrack says, oh yeah, Trump wants to peaceful negotiation. But then on the other side, He's all out supporting Netanyahu, by the way, is in the
middle of a big presidential race for him. And that's why most people believe because that thing's like two weeks away. There are some reports out of Israeli news sources saying that he's in some trouble and that he needs to spark another war, needs to increase stuff. I just saw him in a bulletproof vest today talking about they need to get into the West Bank and clear out some terrorists or clear out whatever. So we could see, you know, an incursion into the West Bank here before his. And, yeah. you know, and you've got Trump saying he's a great war warrior, prime minister, a key partner against Iran, systematically destroyed military financial.
00:33:03
Speaker 2: And then he goes, and this is from Trump in.
00:33:05
Speaker 1: Quotations, unless they change their ways rapidly, we will soon finish the job. Now, again, he gets pressed on these questions and I certainly want to know what has finished the job. And All you got to do is you got to look at what Netanyahu, who's our best partner, who's our strategic, who's involved in our decision-making process. You heard him say it. You've heard other people comment about it. And so Netanyahu has repeatedly affirmed commitment to, and I quote, completing the elimination of the Iranian regime, end quote. And next, end quote, toppling the terrorist regime in Iran, end quote. Right. And he calls it the venomous octopus. And then he says it with discussions with Trump, including recent.
00:33:54
Speaker 2: Calls and quotes. We have to finish the job. All right.
00:34:00
Speaker 1: So you want to know why the State Department is removing families out of Saudi Arabia? That's that's pretty confirmed and non-essential people.
00:34:12
Speaker 2: And now there's.
00:34:12
Speaker 1: Other reports that have said that this, like I said, NBC, CBS, Reuters, and I know what you're saying, Rudd, but they are liars. They're the fake news, right? What they're saying is that the Pentagon has quietly reduced and relocated troops from bases in Jordan, Qatar, and Kuwait in recent days, while several other embassies shifted to restricted operations. a status introduced in August that allows reduced staffing without full suspension. All right. And CENTCOM has described the movements as routine optimization.
00:34:52
Speaker 2: For readiness, right?
00:34:53
Speaker 1: So even in the canned response, it's optimization for readiness. And I just read another report as I was going through here from the Hormoz report that basically said Russia has flown, been flying in their big you know, super cargo plants and they're removing all of their scientists out.
00:35:15
Speaker 2: Of Iran and their families.
00:35:17
Speaker 1: And then what you also have is you have, what was the other one?
00:35:23
Speaker 2: Oh, there's a lot of other people that are bailing out of there.
00:35:28
Speaker 1: People that live and working in those regions are basically getting out of Dodge, right? So, you know, when I kind of look at all these pieces on this, you know, An infinite chessboard of madness I see like a build up I see a preparation I see the hammer coming, right? And that's not what I see Just from evaluating this stuff pretty intensely Since I was 23 years old And I'm 54, right? So when I hear finish the job What does that look like? What does finishing the job mean? And that means you have to remove the entire senior executive level, even mid-level management level of the IRGC. So, Jordy, bring up right now how many IRGC members do they believe are existing in Iran? And then give us the source that tells us that.
00:36:30
Speaker 2: All right. So you got to remove the head of the IRGC.
00:36:34
Speaker 1: Then you got to like, you're going to have to basically, the only way you can do that is by going into Iran.
00:36:41
Speaker 2: Right.
00:36:42
Speaker 1: And, and invading Iran in these key strategic areas where there's these large contingencies of Iranian military personnel, which it seems, I just saw videos, some senior general walking down some underground bump bunker, rows and rows and rows and rows and rows and rows of missiles.
00:37:01
Speaker 2: You know, and all that.
00:37:03
Speaker 1: And, and it doesn't seem like the strikes they've been making, uh, in and around the area, like they're like, they really are ready to stop doing what they're doing.
00:37:13
Speaker 2: So what's it say there? It says roughly 150,000 to 190,000 active IRGC personnel.
00:37:18
Speaker 7: Okay.
00:37:19
Speaker 2: So does anybody remember how many active Taliban there were?
00:37:31
Speaker 1: In the beginning of the war Does anybody remember how many active Sunni radicals Or Iraq Al-Qaeda Iraq In the Sunni triangle Or how many Shias were in Sadr City With that cleric Sadr himself Does anybody remember those numbers Now you probably It wasn't 150,000 Alright And the other thing is Let me ask you this question if all of a sudden China came to our borders or whoever it was, Russia, whatever, you know, whatever floats your boat is a Mexicans. I don't know, whatever, but I don't see why they would invade us, but other than cartels and if they're pissed and based on the last show we did, we know cartels are getting training over in our Ukraine right now, which is interesting. But what we have is we've got them on our borders, getting ready to invade us. I'll tell you what, the dumbest thing that would ever happen in the world is is if you got these sons of bitches and they did a D-Day style invasion down in South Beach or in Fort Lauderdale, man, Florida Man's going to fuck them up pretty bad, dude.
00:38:43
Speaker 2: Like, there's some crazy human beings that have guns.
00:38:47
Speaker 1: Now, you get, if I had a platoon of 50 crazy Florida Man on meth and they would actually listen to them because I tell them they go kill people who want to kill their families.
00:38:57
Speaker 2: Man, that'd be a pretty strong resistance, right?
00:39:00
Speaker 1: I'm no spring chicken, but I
know some tactics and I think we could put up a hell of a fight. What do you think the Persians are going to do? So, you know, this whole idea that we got to finish the job and we thought the first job they told us was, hey, we got to make sure they have no nuclear capability, which we just heard Ambassador Barack say.
00:39:26
Speaker 2: To us that we are done. Right.
00:39:29
Speaker 1: And we also have strategic intelligence reports from last February from Tulsi Gabbard herself. There's no nuclear imminent threat whatsoever. So that's good. Whatever Rick Scott wants to tell you and all the other crazies, um, that's, that's out of the question.
00:39:48
Speaker 2: So where, what's next?
00:39:50
Speaker 1: Then it just comes down to, well, let's strike a deal and let's like release the hostage of the Strait of Hormuz. But guess what? We just destroyed their infrastructure. We destroyed their military, their all kinds of systems, probably energy systems, oil distribution points, all this stuff, bays, harbors, you name it. How many billions of dollars in it? So I don't know about you, but if I could control the Strait of Hormuz the way they're doing, I wouldn't budge unless somebody told me they were going to pay me back for all the damage they created. And I don't think Israel's got those funds, so that means it's you and me. So we bombed the shit out of it to get rid of it, which I thought we did two summers ago.
00:40:39
Speaker 2: And now price of fuel is up through the roof, diesel is up.
00:40:42
Speaker 1: That's Ukraine mostly and Russia, which is far out, but maybe I'll do that one next one. And so what we got here is we got this unique Mexican standoff, right? We've got these two countries at each other's throats and nobody has the upper hand tactically.
00:40:58
Speaker 2: And so now what do we have to do?
00:41:00
Speaker 1: You've got these two guys that are in control of the situation, one who's praising Netanyahu and is trying to help him get elected who's saying, we're not stopping until this is done with or without you. Don't even get me started on the people below him. They're all in, man. This is the war of all wars, which they have every right to do, right? If you're running a country and you think you're under existential threat, man, have at it. But the problem is it's costing me extra five, 600 bucks a month because of my Food prices are up. My gas prices are up. Diesel prices, all the things I'm buying on Amazon are up. My fuel prices when I fly to go to work all the time is costing my firm a ton, so that's probably going to reduce my compensation. You see how all this is connected in order to get the job done. I don't know if they know what that looks like in reality. I think it's just another way to keep a hot war.
00:42:01
Speaker 2: Going on, which is, by the way, The number.
00:42:06
Speaker 1: One thing that's relative to why there's a big consternation of how the Republicans are probably going to lose the midterms.
00:42:17
Speaker 5: All right.
00:42:18
Speaker 2: We'll pay close attention, keep you up to date.
00:42:21
Speaker 1: The next one is right here is early voting is open. And we've got the October surprisers in full force, man.
00:42:31
Speaker 2: Those are my favorite.
00:42:33
Speaker 1: I just love the depths that politicians of all kinds are willing to go to completely sacrifice their dignity, their integrity, their faith by just being absolute cretins to each other.
00:42:53
Speaker 2: And it's always been that way. It's never going to stop. It is what it is.
00:42:57
Speaker 1: Don't get your, you know, clutch your pearls or pick out, you know, get your panties in a bunch, you know, because it's the way it happens. It's the way it does it. So let me just run a little bit through the mail-in ballot. And again, this whole concept of early mail-in balloting, right? And I've covered when does this start? When did it go into hyperdrive, right? Are mail-in ballots capable of being in fraud? Well, I think we've seen any number of reporting on how mail-in ballots can be manipulated or in fraud, right? Especially, you know, as we saw with the Doge and security, social security numbers, right?
00:43:45
Speaker 2: You remember, yeah, and Keith, you forgot. You remember there.
00:43:49
Speaker 1: Were 3.6 million active social security numbers with people that were 120 to 130 years old. Now they say they cleaned all that up, but I have to also remember and let you know, there are, I think like 20 plus court cases going on with the Department of Justice in blue states because they won't clean their voter rolls and they won't let the federal government get access to their voter rolls.
00:44:23
Speaker 2: Because why?
00:44:23
Speaker 1: States control their voting, which I'm all for if you ain't cheating, right? Anyways, so here we go. So early voting is running well ahead of 2022. And as of October 23rd, 2026, about 22 to 23% million early votes have already come in. Now, this is early voting at a location as well as mail-in votings. Now, the University of Florida Election Lab, which is Michael McDonald, approximately 23.1 million total early votes, about 12.7 million mail returned, and 10.5 million in person, with mail ballots requested around 59 million. 59 million people have figured out that I don't want to get off my fat ass, go into the polling station and do it the old fashioned way where paper ballot stamp or poke or whatever my ballot, I'm just going to sit here and I'm going to look at the six to eight ballots that have been mailed to me three or four.
00:45:41
Speaker 2: Of them with names. I don't even know.
00:45:43
Speaker 1: Maybe they lived here long time ago, but they're the same party affiliation and So, you know, what the heck, fireman?
00:45:50
Speaker 2: I'm going to do my civic duty. I'm going to open their ballots.
00:45:53
Speaker 1: I'm going to mark Democrat straight ticket or Republican straight ticket.
00:45:58
Speaker 2: Either way you want.
00:46:00
Speaker 1: And I'm going to send those suckers back in. Or if I'm a nonprofit, I might just go down to Skid Row, summing up about a couple thousand homeless people, give them $ 2 per person. Per signature, have my list of voter rolls of dead people, people with social, remember those social security cards, Medicare, whatever it is, and I'm going to do it. Or I'm just going to go to a polling station where they don't check ID. They don't ask my name. They don't ask anything else, any positive ID for me whatsoever. But early mail-in voting, boy, thank God we've got that. So in roughly two dozen states that publish party registration or early votes, the split is Consistently in the mid-40s for Democrat versus around 30% for Republicans. So that's about 10% to 15% higher turnout for mail-in early voting for Democrats. Top states, top volume, which I find fascinating, right? Because what would be the greatest catastrophe for Republicans today? in modern election history. What would be the most significant loss for the old big R's, the big old elephants or rhinos, whatever you want to call them?
00:47:19
Speaker 2: That'd be Texas.
00:47:21
Speaker 1: Right now, 2.7 million early ballots have come into Texas, which, by the way, has a very tight race with Mr. Ken Paxton, the former acting attorney general who's Republican, versus Tallarico, that guy that is running for Senate, who's oddly the hyper-Christian guy who believes God was, you know, uh, love was like fluid or something like that.
00:47:51
Speaker 2: I don't know.
00:47:52
Speaker 1: Uh, anyways, and he's there, he's an interesting candidate. Um, you know, so you think about it and all these early votes are coming in. Now, Florida's 2.1 million, Georgia, 1.5 million. There's another huge tight Senate race in Georgia, right?
00:48:07
Speaker 2: We've got there. There's a huge Senate race in Michigan. That's real close.
00:48:11
Speaker 1: We've got, uh, some great gubernatorial races that are close.
00:48:16
Speaker 2: Um, So play play the one video of.
00:48:22
Speaker 1: The guy at Real Clear Politics and what he believes on all the polls, because this is really fascinating.
00:48:27
Speaker 2: So why don't you play that for me, bud?
00:48:30
Speaker 5: The early voting stuff.
00:48:33
Speaker 7: All I can say is that people are out there cherry picking whatever they want to see. And in general, it's going to be tough to use that to predict an actual result. Because independents are the main part of what's going on here. Independents have had a massive shift to left nationally, and nobody's really modeling that. So you're not really seeing the independent story. And then also Democrats are apparently changing their voting behavior and not voting by mail anymore. And so people are looking mail-in ballot returns and saying, oh, look, Democrats turned us down. It's like, yeah, it's going to be up somewhere else, right?
00:49:06
Speaker 1: So when you think about
this guy who's basically saying it's really tough to predict all this stuff, I'd go with that.
00:49:13
Speaker 2: What you need to do is uh, I.
00:49:15
Speaker 1: Think you need to pay attention to your own precincts, your own, your own races, that whole thing.
00:49:20
Speaker 2: Uh, see what you're doing. Go read the comments of people.
00:49:23
Speaker 1: Although the bot wars, the bot, the bot armies are out in full force for that. Um, but my, my favorite place, uh, about early voting and the lead up to all big campaigns and elections are the October surprises.
00:49:38
Speaker 5: Right?
00:49:38
Speaker 1: That's the true entertainment. And I'll tell you what, we have had some fricking doozies, right? Probably the most notorious one that's out there right now was Vivek Ramaswamy, who's running against Amy Acton for the gubernatorial race in Ohio. And this past week, Oh, the vague dropped a $ 4 million spend, uh, airing Amy Acton's, uh, estranged mother who basically said, Amy was a liar. She's always been a liar.
00:50:17
Speaker 2: She sucks. She's horrible.
00:50:19
Speaker 1: And then as it turns out, she was allowing her husband, stepfather, whatever, to physically and sexually abuse Amy and her brother to the point where they had to be pulled out of their home at 8.
00:50:35
Speaker 2: And 12 years old.
00:50:38
Speaker 1: So that was a great job on Vivek or his campaign leader. It's almost as if we're going to tank Vivek on this one. It's not like you could have just gone and looked into her entire profile and what was going on. Any podcast she'd been on talking about the trauma of her childhood whatsoever. But to attack her with the woman who allowed her abuse to take place and hasn't spoken to her since she was taken out of her home at 12 as some type of political hit job, that's just low rent, man. That just proves that you're basically a piece of shit in my book, right? Going after a man's family and his kids, but that's what politicians do. That's what they do when they do it, when they know they're getting crushed. And even when they're not, even when they're up, they're going to hit below the belt and they're going to smile doing it. And I just saw a video today, basically begging Vivek's audience, the whole intention was not to discredit the trauma that Ms. Acton received while she was a kid. We're not talking about, we're turning our backs on child pedophilia. That's not what we do in our party. What we do do is, you know, we just hit below the belt and we hope you don't notice.
00:52:00
Speaker 2: That's it.
00:52:02
Speaker 1: So that sucks. Um, there's another one, uh, where, um, um, this is pretty awesome. Uh, Wesleyan media project, uh, had a, uh, $ 137 million with 220 ads, uh, majority for Republican groups where basically, uh, had, uh, Janet Georgia, Senator John also receiving beauty treatments, uh, All this is AI. This is AI conducted advertising, right?
00:52:35
Speaker 2: What was it?
00:52:37
Speaker 1: James Tallarico was using a crayon with a Bible. Abu El-Sayed with a fabricated family and a board game imagery that had written on it, death to America style elements, you.
00:52:53
Speaker 2: Know, and on and on.
00:52:54
Speaker 1: We saw some other crazy stuff before against Massey. we've seen, you know, like the whole idea, like you think you're getting one up and when you do, whether it's, you know, some childlike Lego video against them or, you know, some kind of AI thing with, you know, somebody walking in, like they have, I remember Massey was next to Ilyan Omar and someone else walking in. Right. And then the other one, that one that's actually two that really hit me that were seemed legit, which was, Ilihan Omar, basically, they've discovered that she's using a fake name Um, and here was her in an interview and how she responded to it, which again, listen to the language. This man that was your husband, when did they start saying that he was your brother?
00:53:42
Speaker 5: Why?
00:53:43
Speaker 6: I started with the Somali blog, um, uh, that I don't know if it still exists, but somebody put in there that, you know, that he had to have been my brother or something to that effect. And, um, white wings, um, conspiracy theorists in Minneapolis got a hold of it, and they just kind of went and found random people who were like, she introduced us.
00:54:09
Speaker 5: She introduced him to us and said.
00:54:11
Speaker 6: He was her brother, which is insane. I mean, I don't know those people that they talk about.
00:54:20
Speaker 5: You were not related to him at all?
00:54:22
Speaker 2: Not that.
00:54:22
Speaker 1: There's not some weird kernel of truth that through some game.
00:54:25
Speaker 6: Not to my knowledge.
00:54:27
Speaker 2: That was the big gotcha.
00:54:28
Speaker 1: Right.
00:54:28
Speaker 5: In terms of what you're talking about promising, like we're going.
00:54:30
Speaker 2: To nail her on the.
00:54:31
Speaker 1: And that's, you know, I'd stop. And that's, you know, here she is. She got into this question and then she drops the thing. Not to my knowledge. So, you know, whether this is real or not, I mean, there's the president and a long thing is calling for her to be removed from Congress. And Tom Holman, the head of, you know, border patrol and all that he's calling, you know, get rid of her right now. She needs to be ripped out and sent away. And, you know, and, and, you know, they're MAGA diehards. They're like, hell yeah, put her in coughs and send her overseas and all that. And, you know, and it's like, it's like these distractions, but you know, I guess you got to do what you got to do.
00:55:11
Speaker 2: And then the other one was, there was a really.
00:55:14
Speaker 1: Significant one from the Dems that came out that released a video, uh, uh, against Lindsey Graham with three male escorts that accused Lindsey Graham of having paying them for sex. And one of them was 17 when he did it in Arizona. And he, the, the
alleges that it was at like John McCain's place or something like that. It was Pretty intense stuff. And, and basically saying, and it would, I forget, I was just like, God, this guy is, you know, I mean, he's like pays for sex and, you know, if that's your thing and that's what you want to do, it is illegal, but you know, but the pedophile one for certainly is, you know what, and then. what I find is like that then documentary shifts over and it's like, how can we let his sister run for Senate now when, when she.
00:56:03
Speaker 2: Knew about this the whole fricking time.
00:56:06
Speaker 1: And, and, and then they, they have the little clip of her when she's in her debate and they ask her about Greta Van Susteren asked her about, how do you feel about middle East, uh, uh, policy and what we should do. And she's like, you know, I'm just going to be, I'm just going to be honest with you. I just, uh, you know, Foreign policy is just not my thing. I wouldn't be okay answering that question.
00:56:31
Speaker 2: I'm okay being a U.S.
00:56:33
Speaker 1: Senator, the most powerful position in all of politics, but I'm not okay to understand, which, by the way, my brother was responsible for the Ukraine war, the Iran war, every other war that's been going on for the last decade. 40 years since he's been off. I don't know nothing about foreign policy, but you can, you can guarantee I will rubber stamp everything my brother believed in.
00:56:57
Speaker 2: Dude, you can't make this shit up, man. So like, all right, what is that? Like the dude's dead.
00:57:08
Speaker 1: We're going to come out and say he was gay, which are pretty much what I'm watching is everybody like, Oh great. He's gay. What's what's the big deal. Well, the 17-year-old is kind of a big deal for sure. The other ones, that's on him, whatever he wants to do. But the 17-year-old for sure is not okay, right? So does that negate her ability? Should we not vote for her sister?
00:57:33
Speaker 7: I don't know.
00:57:34
Speaker 1: If that woman makes it into office, then I will from now here till the end of day say, all right, the sky's falling. It's over now because that woman should be nowhere near the Senate in any way, shape, or form.
00:57:47
Speaker 2: Um, what was the last one? And then the other one was, uh, Nope. That was pretty much it, but we'll see more. We'll see. Oh, Oh, ah, and halt there.
00:58:01
Speaker 1: Right.
00:58:02
Speaker 2: Jordy's shaking his head at me like, no, you got one more. Okay. Last week. This is a doozy.
00:58:10
Speaker 1: Uh, vanity fair released a gigantic article about Jared Kushner, uh, Now, in this article, it alleges that the Dutch GRU, which is their intelligence agency, somehow was able to hack into Jared Kushner's phone and alleges that he had access to a Middle Eastern slush fund up to the tune of about a billion dollars or so, $ 700 million or something like that, and that he was It showed the emails and the transactions of these accounts that he had access to. Yet there was no record of it anywhere. And you would think the guy that is leading the world, basically leading the world away from war as the senior negotiator for Europe, Ukraine and Russia and Ukraine. Iran, Israel, and the U S that this guy would pretty, in some case would, we would probably want him to disclose whether he was acting as a foreign agent, whether he was getting paid by foreign countries or companies or whatever it is you would think. Now, you know, I'll tell you what, the Dems are going hard at old Jared Kushner, man. Because if you forgot the whole craziness when he and Ivana were going to buy this fortified former military underground bunker compound.
00:59:47
Speaker 2: In Albania and then a million Albanians were in.
00:59:50
Speaker 1: The street protesting because it was a Rothschild that was going to sell them the island and.
01:00:00
Speaker 2: Oh, man, old Kush there, buddy.
01:00:03
Speaker 1: You know, I just, you know, it really seems like he's putting his best foot forward every chance he gets. He's really trying to bring peace through the world. Don't forget the Abrahamic Accords, which, you know, guaranteed the Middle East would receive a boatload of money and financial opportunities to redevelop Israel. Remember, all that happened prior to october 7th and the fiasco of that horrific terrorist attack and the consequential response from the israelis in gaza and now it looks like they might launch an offensive they certainly already have in southern lebanon and now they're about ready to launch into west bank as reported today so you know that's a pretty substantial now why is it well because that's the president's son man And if the president's son is doing some dirty dealings with these countries over there that are sympathetic to Iran or, or Islam or Al Qaeda or, or Syria or whatever it might be, you know, against our way of life, I guess, because right. Cause, cause the Persian Arab Muslim crazies and all the, you know, people are saying the Islamic extremists is coming to here. Look at France.
01:01:24
Speaker 2: Right?
01:01:25
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, it was a, you know, a, a, the European union that basically opened the flood gates. It was both the Republicans and the Democrats that have pretty much opened the flood gates to America. Some people say as high as 60 million foreigners are in the country.
01:01:41
Speaker 2: We don't know.
01:01:42
Speaker 1: Because guess what? They're illegal and they're not reporting themselves. Um, which was also another, uh, uh, promise that we were going to, you know, kick out millions and millions of illegals, which haven't seemed to go anywhere since that promise took place.
01:01:57
Speaker 2: So, you know, when.
01:01:58
Speaker 1: Kush is identified as a guy that's doing some shady dealings for the president, what does that do? That just adds to the already preexisting notion that the half or the independents or the libertarians, whatever that
coalition was that was one of the most legendary historical coalitions in the history of politics, which won Trump 2024 by a landslide, Electoral College, you know, the populist vote.
01:02:30
Speaker 2: He had the mandate to shut the border, remove illegals, no new.
01:02:35
Speaker 1: Wars, kick out the, you know, go after the Epstein class, lower, end the war in Russia, lower prices, the golden age, the golden age of America economically. Man, no wonder we're seeing some October surprises. Again, one of the things that I think everybody needs to wisen up to, and I'm seeing this more and more, and again, don't, don't, I was just out in Iowa.
01:03:10
Speaker 2: I was in Nashville recently. I've been all over the place.
01:03:14
Speaker 1: And the sentiment with people that I asked to talk to, they're sick of being lied to by all politicians. It's not just Republicans. It's certainly not just Democrats. It's all politicians. They're sick of it on their local level. They're sick of it with the flock cameras and the surveillance. They're sick of it with the data centers. They're sick of it. with all these different things, man. And, you know, uh, that reality is, is, is, is coming to fruition. So what are we going to have? We're probably going to have some, uh, tight races that, uh, seem like they might inch over to the Democrats.
01:03:52
Speaker 2: It's yet to be seen.
01:03:53
Speaker 1: I can't pick that until after all the votes in, because, uh, in many places we know those votes will keep coming in for one two, three, maybe a month afterwards.
01:04:04
Speaker 2: Especially if there's some kind of thing.
01:04:06
Speaker 1: My other favorite rumor that's out there, and I don't know, Jordy, if you saw this one, but there was a rumor out there that.
01:04:17
Speaker 2: There was this hidden recording.
01:04:19
Speaker 1: And again, this is all ex-rumor mill and all that, but I always get a kick out of these ones, that apparently there's this large group, like 1,800 people, Former intel and generals and politicians that are basically working with state governors from blue states, and they believe that Trump is going to try and instill the Insurrection Act or something that as a result of. you know, foreign interference in the election systems and all that stuff. And that they're basically getting together and they're going to say, Hey, guess what? You old, old Donnie boy, you can go pack sand. We're not listening to the federal government anymore. We're going to do whatever we want to do. So we got that going for us, which is nice. But what I'm going to tell you is I'm going to say, keep your ear to the grindstone, right? Make sure you're paying close attention. Look at all stories with an open mind. Uh, don't get fooled by the AI, uh, uh, AI videos or the, the ad campaigns or whatever.
01:05:23
Speaker 2: Let, leave all that shit to the boomers.
01:05:25
Speaker 1: Uh, you need to just come out of your hole and you need to basically start doing some, uh, significant research with Claude Grok, chat GPT, you pick and just dig into a subject, dig into a, a race, uh, have it give you a comprehensive analysis about policy. about what they're saying they're going to do, what their past record looks like, what they've said on every interview or podcast they've ever done. Because all these things can do all that stuff for you. And the fact that we have this at our disposal, at our fingertips, it gives you zero excuse to be uninformed right now. Again, that's all to boobers, Wade, and that's their They can just watch Fox or MSNBC and they can get convinced that Elon Musk talking about white Christian nationalism on his Facebook and that he's going to indict everybody. Or the same thing on the other side, that Trump is going to put a bunch of Democrats in concentration camps afterwards. That's just the state of where we're at. So it's on you, as I always tell you. I'm here to help you. You know, I've got Rutt Coffee, right? Actually, it's Black Rifle Coffee, but they make a Rutt product, which I highly recommend. Everybody go get and use FrogLogic20 as your promo code and let them know I sent you because there's no better coffee on the planet than Rutt.
01:06:55
Speaker 2: Rutt Coffee at Black Rifle Coffee. Thank you very little.
01:06:59
Speaker 1: Um, and, uh, you know, I just believe in my heart that it's on us, man. It's on you and me to really understand and decipher, uh, what's going on here and, uh, what's in store for us, because I believe over the next, uh, at least, uh, four to eight years, uh, things are going to get spicy. And if you're not prepared, if you're not ready for it mentally, emotionally, uh, probably physically with some prepper shit as well, too, uh, then it's on you. because we live in a really dynamic world where information is coming at us like a fucking typhoon every single day. And I'm here to try and give you some context to try and map it out, to get you to understand it for sure. But again, I can't hit it all myself anyways. Well, that's all I got. I've hoped you'd enjoyed this little session with a rut rant today. And, um, man, please, if you can give us a follow a subscribe, a like, share us with your friends, leave a comment, give us a five-star writing, all that stuff. And then just continue spreading the word to your family and friends about what we're trying to do here again. My job is not to single anyone out, but to give some context to the whole scenario based on as I see it and even learn myself what my own biases are trying to convince me based on this crazy, nasty algorithm that feels like it's got a, it's, you know, shit kicking boot on my throat 24 seven.
01:08:31
Speaker 2: But that's why we're here.
01:08:33
Speaker 1: That's why Geordie, that's our mission to try and bring you a little bit of fast bang and truth.
01:08:39
Speaker 2: And we love you a ton. We hope you're good. God bless you.
01:08:43
Speaker 7: Hoo-yah.