บทถอดความฉบับเต็มของ Common Questions about AI for Educators

choice, especially if you are planning curriculum or if you're working with policy and procedures. I would go to the system provided tool for those use cases. every time and definitely run experiments and even if you wanted to compare across tools I think it'd be worth your time not every time just as an initial test run now outside of that chat GBT Copilot and Gemini are common in education spaces but again it depends on what you can actually access in your organization There's no point falling in love with a tool that's blocked at work, right? the second criteria here in making a decision, and this is the one that people don't think about or expect, the best AI is the one that you're already using. Every conversation you've had with it, it's been learning about you, your context, your tone, your recurring problems. When you switch tools, you're starting typically from zero although the models now allow you to transfer relatively easily. I actually did this earlier this year. I switched from ChatGPT to Claude and I just followed the guides that are provided by Anthropic who built Claude. But again there's no point doing that if you can't get Claude in your work environment. And with this criteria, Ethan Mollock made a great point a couple of years back that the worst AI is the one you're using today because they continue to get better in two ways. Firstly, the models the developers continue to improve the models. And secondly, as I just talked about, your interaction, your training the model to respond, to meet your preferences. So that's worth considering when you ask what's the best tool. Now finally, and this one links to the next frequently asked question. if you are using one of the bigger free models, the paid version of whatever that is is better, of course, than the free version. The free versions block you or you know, cap you right at the moment when you need the most typically. It's so frustrating, right? So just to wrap up this question, in time you'll find the strengths and limitations across the platforms and you'll work out which one will execute the task best. I recently heard the term app smashing, where you use a platform for its strengths. And I'm gonna say, okay, so you use the system-built tool for curriculum planning, and then you would use other models for resources like images of modeled responses, or generating a podcast as a student resource, or conducting deep research to support the material in the unit that you're teaching. So the best AI for teachers isn't a single answer, it really does depend on what you're using it for. The one that you can access in your work environment, the one that you've already been training, and whatever that is, upgrade it to paid. So let's get into that next. Question two: Is it worth paying for one of the models? And I'm gonna say yes, and let me tell you why I don't even hesitate on this anymore. A couple of ways to think about this. firstly. I am going to bet that you have been outlaying your hard-earned money for classroom resources, education resources for years. textbooks, commercial products, printables, stationery. we all do it. None of us blink at that. And this is no different, except the return on your investment is arguably higher. If you're on the free version, And constantly hitting those limits, you're not saving money, you are wasting time working around that paywall that a subscription would remove. Now the pricing is often quoted in US dollars, so factor that into the conversion. But even then, for most school leaders and teachers. it's genuinely a small outlay for a tool doing hours of work. And in Australia, if you're using it for your role, it's worth talking to your accountant about claiming it as a tax deduction. If we come at this question from a different angle, how much would you pay for a virtual assistant? And how much is it worth to get your Sundays back? Sometimes we make a decision based on a dollar value when there are other significant costs like time. And how much do you value that and what would you pay for it? So here's my advice. Just trial the paid version for a month or two. The beauty of it is you're just paying month by month. So at any time you can cancel. And if you're not getting your money's worth, easy, right? but I say trial it first. Now here's the question that has a bit more weight. How do you make sure you're getting a balanced answer from your AI model, not just an echo of what you already believe? How do you get the AI to challenge you, not just agree with you? So firstly, understand that the models are trained to be helpful and helpful often gets confused with agreeable. If you ask it am I right with this behavior decision, it will very often find you reasons you're right. because of the way you asked it. So the fix is in the prompt. Instead of asking it to confirm your read on a situation, ask it to argue the opposite case. For example, give me the strongest argument against my view. That one shift changes everything you get back in the response. If you're a principal drafting a tough message to a parent and you ask the AI, does this response seem fair? You'll get affirmation because you framed it in the way that you've asked. If you ask instead what would the parents' strongest objection to this be, you'll catch your blind spots before you hit send on that email. So let me share a few other prompt. stems that I use. For example, you could try what assumptions have I made? Or what perspectives have I overlooked? This one's a favourite. Give me five counterintuitive ideas. Ask it what would critics point out? Or something like generate three alternative options or points of view. This whole question really matters more in leadership than almost any other context because leaders, you already have positional power. The people below you are less likely to challenge your thinking. And if your AI tool is just nodding along, you've built an entire feedback loop with nobody in it willing to say. Have you considered you might be wrong here? Balance isn't something that the AI will deliver to you by default, but it is something you have to deliberately ask for every time. The same way a good leader deliberately seeks out alternative voice in the room rather than waiting for it to be offered up. But if you really wanted to step this up, you could also go beyond what you ask in the prompts and you could adjust the settings in your profile. So find the profile menu, it's usually where your name or initials are, and in there customize the settings for the bass style and tone. The other thing you could think about as well is developing a preferred response style in a conversation with your model and then prompt it, ask it to save that to the memory. And that will then shift how it responds in every interaction with you. So as I wrap up this episode, here's my question for you. Next time you ask AI for its take on a decision you've already half made, Whose voice is missing from that answer? And did you even give it permission to bring that voice into the conversation? And of course, I've got a next step for you for the next week. Before your next big decision, a staffing call, a parent response, potentially a policy change. Ask the AI to argue against your position before you ask it to confirm it. One sentence could make the difference. What's the strongest case against what I'm about to do? Do that one this week and noticed the shift. So there you go. Three frequently asked questions over the last three years. Which AI is it worth it? And how do I keep it honest? The first two have simple answers. The third one is worth building a habit around. Until next time, take care.