สำเนาบทสนทนา 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:04.280 --> 00:00:07.799
With laurn segle And from London and Gerard Read from Berlin.
2
00:00:08.320 --> 00:00:11.119
This is Redefining Energy Today.
3
00:00:11.439 --> 00:00:16.199
On Refining Energy job, we're going to talk about space.
4
00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:25.800
The final frontier, Space a final frontier.
5
00:00:31.920 --> 00:00:36.759
And there's been so much debate conversation around data centers
6
00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:40.960
in space, and especially all the excitement around the SpaceX
7
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:43.759
IPO that we really wanted to know if it was
8
00:00:43.799 --> 00:00:45.439
science fiction or if it was for.
9
00:00:45.479 --> 00:00:48.840
Real absolutely charty, right, Yeah.
10
00:00:48.439 --> 00:00:51.520
Before we introduce our guests, I have a one minute
11
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:57.359
clip from Elon Musk explaining why half of the centers
12
00:00:57.479 --> 00:00:59.640
will be in space in a few years. Let's listen
13
00:00:59.679 --> 00:01:01.679
to the.
14
00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:03.880
The availability of energy is the issue. If you look
15
00:01:03.880 --> 00:01:07.560
at electrical output outside of China, everywhere outside of China
16
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:09.680
it's more or less flat. But if you're putting data
17
00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:12.280
centers anywhere except China, where you're gonna get you electricity,
18
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:14.840
especially as you scale, the output of chips is growing
19
00:01:14.879 --> 00:01:18.159
pretty much exponentially, but the output of electricity is flat.
20
00:01:18.519 --> 00:01:20.719
So how you're going to tell them chips aren't It's
21
00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:23.200
harder to scale on the ground than it is to
22
00:01:23.200 --> 00:01:26.000
scale in space. But also you're going to get about
23
00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:29.599
five times the effectiveness of solid pals in space versus
24
00:01:29.599 --> 00:01:31.840
the ground. And you don't need batteries because you don't
25
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:36.159
have a day, night cycle, or seasonality, clouds or an
26
00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:39.640
atmosphere in space. So it's actually much cheaper to do
27
00:01:39.719 --> 00:01:42.480
in space. And my prediction is that it will be
28
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:45.519
by far the cheapest place to put AI will be space,
29
00:01:45.680 --> 00:01:48.359
and thirty six months less, you can mark my words,
30
00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:52.040
in thirty six months, the most economically compelling place to
31
00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:53.400
put AI will be space.
32
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:57.359
Lauren, I'm not going to bet against Ela Musco on that.
33
00:01:57.359 --> 00:01:58.359
That's what I would say too.
34
00:01:58.959 --> 00:02:01.359
Now is timing my be out a little bit as usual.
35
00:02:01.480 --> 00:02:03.480
I definitely think we're going to get there. I definitely
36
00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:05.159
think we're going to get there now.
37
00:02:07.120
Load full transcript
--> 00:02:09.479
Not the only thing in space. There's a lot of
38
00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:14.719
satellites already and more coming. So our guest had an idea,
39
00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:18.639
and this guy has already built two space companies, so
40
00:02:18.879 --> 00:02:21.479
you know what he's talking about is at the Innovation
41
00:02:22.039 --> 00:02:26.639
and Engineering Committee at NASAU. His idea is to help
42
00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:28.599
refuel the satellites.
43
00:02:29.360 --> 00:02:32.240
Yes, Laura, and we were really lucky to get one
44
00:02:32.280 --> 00:02:34.759
of those pioneers that come on the show, and this
45
00:02:34.840 --> 00:02:38.479
is Andrew Rush is a CEO of Star Catcher. As
46
00:02:38.479 --> 00:02:40.560
you said, what they're doing is they're building the world's
47
00:02:40.599 --> 00:02:43.560
first orbital electrical.
48
00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:48.159
Grid, and he's signing PPAs his satellite company, which is
49
00:02:48.199 --> 00:02:52.319
absolutely extraordinary. So let's bring you on the show and
50
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:56.159
try to understand what energy as a service platform in
51
00:02:56.240 --> 00:02:57.520
space is all about.
52
00:02:57.879 --> 00:03:15.319
Absolutely, Andrew, welcome to the show. Thank you for having me, Hundrew.
53
00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:18.120
Great to have you, and I'd like to really kick
54
00:03:18.159 --> 00:03:22.000
off with a simple question, which is if I look
55
00:03:22.039 --> 00:03:24.439
at what you're doing, you're trying to build the world's
56
00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:28.199
first orbital energy grid. Just please explain to us what
57
00:03:28.240 --> 00:03:28.639
that is.
58
00:03:29.240 --> 00:03:32.120
Yeah, we live in an amazing time. We live in
59
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:35.159
basically the second Golden Age, and we've seen the number
60
00:03:35.159 --> 00:03:38.479
of satellites on orbit go from one thousand to now
61
00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:41.599
ten thousand and soon to be one hundred thousand. Every
62
00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:45.199
satellite in space has its own power generator. They're all
63
00:03:45.240 --> 00:03:47.560
going on basically camping trips to space. They have their
64
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:49.759
own solar rays. When they see the sun, they charge up.
65
00:03:49.759 --> 00:03:52.120
When they don't, they live off the batteries. This is
66
00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:56.080
really constraining, and in fact, the average satellite in space
67
00:03:56.400 --> 00:04:00.439
has something like fifteen hundred blatts of power availability on
68
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:03.840
board about as much as my kid's gaming computer uses.
69
00:04:04.479 --> 00:04:07.759
But we want our satellites to act like cell phone
70
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:11.080
towers in space. We want to do orbital compute in space.
71
00:04:11.120 --> 00:04:12.360
We want to do manufacturing.
72
00:04:12.360 --> 00:04:12.759
One day.
73
00:04:12.840 --> 00:04:15.800
We take amazing high resolution images and process those and
74
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.560
send them down to Earth. All of these things are
75
00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:22.319
really power intense, so there's a disconnect between the amount
76
00:04:22.319 --> 00:04:24.279
of power available and what we want to do in space.
77
00:04:24.759 --> 00:04:27.920
At Starcatcher, the company that I co founded, we are
78
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:31.560
solving this problem by building a power grid in space
79
00:04:31.680 --> 00:04:34.920
that collects energy from the Sun and concentrates it and
80
00:04:34.959 --> 00:04:39.040
then distributes that energy to our client satellites by sending
81
00:04:39.120 --> 00:04:42.920
them basically the kinds of light that solarrays are already
82
00:04:42.959 --> 00:04:46.000
really good at turning into power, which basically visible and
83
00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:49.439
near infrared light. So we're building a grid in space
84
00:04:49.839 --> 00:04:52.519
that will beam energy from our satellite to our client
85
00:04:52.519 --> 00:04:55.279
satellites so that they don't have just fifteen hundred blots
86
00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:58.279
of power availability, they have like fifteen thousand months or
87
00:04:58.319 --> 00:05:02.240
one hundred thousand months, begin to have enough power to
88
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:05.720
answer the call of what we are building in the
89
00:05:05.720 --> 00:05:06.600
future in space.
90
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:09.240
And Andrew just let me cut across. Say when you
91
00:05:09.279 --> 00:05:11.160
say when you When I heard the words be me,
92
00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:16.000
I thought of beam me up, Scotty, right and sorry.
93
00:05:16.040 --> 00:05:19.439
Explain to me how you're transmitting the power.
94
00:05:19.920 --> 00:05:21.800
Talk a little bit about that, Jerald.
95
00:05:21.800 --> 00:05:24.279
I appreciate that because I grew up on this steady
96
00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:28.160
diet of science fiction and sites fact and specifically Star Trek,
97
00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:31.600
so appreciate the reference. So we have on board our
98
00:05:31.600 --> 00:05:35.800
satellites we have multiple wavelengths of lasers that we use
99
00:05:35.879 --> 00:05:39.000
to generate essentially of flashlight, and you think of it
100
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:41.720
as a flashlight in space, like a big column of
101
00:05:41.800 --> 00:05:44.319
light that we can steer in space. It's about a
102
00:05:44.399 --> 00:05:46.680
meter and a half across, so it starts with lasers,
103
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:48.959
but it really is more like a flashlight. And that's
104
00:05:49.079 --> 00:05:51.759
enough to bathe the average solar ray that's on a
105
00:05:51.759 --> 00:05:56.000
spacecraft on orbit in energy so that that can supercharge.
106
00:05:56.480 --> 00:05:59.759
So the Saturday light will keep their batteries, but they
107
00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:02.839
would receive your beam. So how far away are you
108
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:04.279
going to be and how long is it going to
109
00:06:04.319 --> 00:06:06.560
take to chalk the battery.
110
00:06:06.639 --> 00:06:10.439
We put a lot of emphasis on being backward compatible.
111
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:12.839
People don't have to buy a custom receiver to work
112
00:06:12.879 --> 00:06:15.480
with us, They don't have to change the orientation of
113
00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:17.680
their spacecraft on moor a bit, and we just beam
114
00:06:17.759 --> 00:06:21.120
energy to their arrays whether they're in sunlight themselves and
115
00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:23.519
they can actually get more energy by bias putting more
116
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:25.839
light on them, or when they're an eclipse, and we
117
00:06:25.879 --> 00:06:28.839
can keep them powered. How long it takes to charge
118
00:06:29.000 --> 00:06:33.079
is really mission dependent. If somebody says, hey, my satellite
119
00:06:33.319 --> 00:06:37.000
has a thousand lots of power native on board, really
120
00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:39.199
like another two thousand watts, well, we're just going to
121
00:06:39.279 --> 00:06:43.680
put a couple of suns of energy equivalent on them consistently.
122
00:06:44.199 --> 00:06:47.519
Now contrast that with somebody that says, hey, I'm going
123
00:06:47.560 --> 00:06:49.360
to go do this maneuver. I'm going to use my
124
00:06:49.480 --> 00:06:52.600
electric propulsion thruster to boost my orbit up a little bit.
125
00:06:52.959 --> 00:06:55.079
So I just need additional power for like this two
126
00:06:55.079 --> 00:06:57.439
hour period, and so then we would just give them
127
00:06:57.480 --> 00:06:59.959
a dish that power for about that two hour period.
128
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:02.399
And then in terms of how far we can throw
129
00:07:02.439 --> 00:07:05.560
the light. Now, we're a slave to physics like everyone is.
130
00:07:05.959 --> 00:07:08.639
So the configuration that we have, the design we have,
131
00:07:09.120 --> 00:07:12.040
we can beam energy up to about two thousand kilometers
132
00:07:12.199 --> 00:07:15.879
away from our core power node satellites and so we
133
00:07:16.040 --> 00:07:18.800
cover everywhere in LEO by putting up a constellation of
134
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:20.160
about two hundred satellites.
135
00:07:20.720 --> 00:07:23.319
Now I've done a bit of research, and of course
136
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:28.399
what's been amazing is the decrease in the cost of
137
00:07:28.480 --> 00:07:32.920
sending some mass into space. So if I look twenty
138
00:07:32.959 --> 00:07:35.680
five years ago, you had the legacy, the low key,
139
00:07:35.839 --> 00:07:40.160
the high end, they would charge you ten thousand dollars pokidogram.
140
00:07:41.120 --> 00:07:44.319
Now Falcon nine is going to charge you one thousand,
141
00:07:44.399 --> 00:07:47.839
five hundred, so that's what eight times cheaper. And of
142
00:07:47.839 --> 00:07:52.399
course Starship announced two hundred dollar pakido Are you banking
143
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:53.560
on those advancements?
144
00:07:54.480 --> 00:07:57.879
The reduction in launch cost over the last like ten
145
00:07:57.959 --> 00:08:01.639
or fifteen years has just been an enormous boon to
146
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:06.560
the commercial space industry. Really, it birthed this modern commercial
147
00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:10.959
space industry, like having launch cost way down and expanding availability,
148
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:16.480
and that's what's enabled next generation remote sensing Earth observation
149
00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:20.120
companies like Planet and that's what's enabled the direct to
150
00:08:20.199 --> 00:08:24.240
sell connectivity constellations we're seeing being put up from AST Mobile,
151
00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:29.639
Amazon and SpaceX themselves, and that's what is enabling the
152
00:08:29.680 --> 00:08:34.039
future of space. But you really need additional infrastructure. Can
153
00:08:34.120 --> 00:08:37.720
think of launch as basically transportation infrastructure the roads of space,
154
00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:41.879
and we really need additional infrastructure to unlock the true
155
00:08:42.399 --> 00:08:45.440
next generation applications of space, and that's where building power
156
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:49.799
grid like we're doing Starcatcher comes into play. We're excited
157
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:53.360
for launch costs to continue to come down, but we're
158
00:08:53.399 --> 00:08:57.840
not reliant upon our business, our technology. Our constellation doesn't
159
00:08:57.879 --> 00:09:01.639
require starship for exams sample to be up and flying
160
00:09:01.679 --> 00:09:05.120
and available at two hundred dollars a kilogram, because we've
161
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:08.200
actually seen a little bit of a retraction in the
162
00:09:08.279 --> 00:09:11.679
last two or three years in that trajectory of launch cost.
163
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:14.639
We got down to about that thirteen hundred dollars kilogram number,
164
00:09:14.679 --> 00:09:16.840
and now it's actually gone, it's ticked up a little
165
00:09:16.879 --> 00:09:19.080
bit to maybe more like two thousand Andrew.
166
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:22.320
Could you just explain to me, if I am a
167
00:09:22.360 --> 00:09:27.440
satellite company today, what's the economic benefit for me actually
168
00:09:27.480 --> 00:09:30.440
going and using your services right now?
169
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:34.039
If you're a satellite owner operator, you buy everything up front,
170
00:09:34.200 --> 00:09:37.240
the capex, to design your system, to build your satellites,
171
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:39.720
and the field those is the biggest hurdle for you
172
00:09:39.799 --> 00:09:42.639
to clear and in fact, a lot of space companies
173
00:09:42.759 --> 00:09:46.679
die in that capital formation capex part of the story.
174
00:09:47.159 --> 00:09:49.759
So one of the huge benefits
that we provide just
175
00:09:49.799 --> 00:09:52.919
from a business perspective is that the power system is
176
00:09:52.919 --> 00:09:56.120
fifteen to twenty percent of the cost of a satellite.
177
00:09:56.200 --> 00:09:58.480
But what we do is we're selling energy to you
178
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:00.480
not as a big upfront call it is a big
179
00:10:00.480 --> 00:10:03.799
capex cost, but actually just as an opex cost. So
180
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:07.240
we sell energy like on a WAT per year delivered basis,
181
00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:10.440
as an operating expense, and so that lowers that initial
182
00:10:10.519 --> 00:10:14.159
cost barrier and enables folks to get up faster and
183
00:10:14.200 --> 00:10:17.600
more cheaply, and also stay in a smaller form factor
184
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:20.840
because although launch costs have come down, it's still not
185
00:10:20.960 --> 00:10:24.480
free to put things in space. We enable satellites that
186
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:27.879
are a few hundred kilograms that costs maybe single digit
187
00:10:27.960 --> 00:10:32.720
millions to have the same power availability as satellites that
188
00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:36.120
are thousands of kilogram and cost tens of millions of dollars.
189
00:10:36.279 --> 00:10:39.320
There's just enormous savings and changes in the way that
190
00:10:39.360 --> 00:10:42.240
we design systems. Now, of course, there are other benefits
191
00:10:42.320 --> 00:10:45.320
to life extension of assets on orbit. That's a really
192
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:48.039
big one of being able to letting people increase the
193
00:10:48.120 --> 00:10:51.159
uptime that they have available on their spacecraft. All of
194
00:10:51.200 --> 00:10:54.360
these things are additional ways that we provide a lot
195
00:10:54.360 --> 00:10:56.720
of value just satellite designers today.
196
00:10:57.080 --> 00:10:59.639
So you can to announce two hundreds of them, one
197
00:10:59.679 --> 00:11:00.960
of them, how much does it cost.
198
00:11:01.799 --> 00:11:04.320
The general approach that we take at Starcatcher is a
199
00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:08.320
crawl walk run approach to technology maturation and then fielding
200
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:12.759
system we're building. We've actually built our first satellite. It's
201
00:11:12.759 --> 00:11:16.200
a subscale system that will fly in the next year.
202
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:18.240
We are closer to that launch date. We're going to
203
00:11:18.279 --> 00:11:20.639
talk more about that, and then we'll field in a
204
00:11:20.679 --> 00:11:24.360
subscale operational prototype pilot power plant a few years after that,
205
00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:27.720
and then get to full up operational capacity. By the
206
00:11:27.840 --> 00:11:31.159
end of the decade. Each satellite will have about one
207
00:11:31.240 --> 00:11:34.679
hundred kilo loots of energy delivery capacity, and the total
208
00:11:34.759 --> 00:11:38.240
constellational be able to service about twenty percent of the
209
00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:42.000
current power generation demand on orbit today. Now, of course,
210
00:11:42.039 --> 00:11:44.960
that demands a moving target ten x number satellite space.
211
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:46.480
That demand is going to go up by ten x
212
00:11:46.799 --> 00:11:49.639
and so the constellation size actually will grow as the
213
00:11:49.759 --> 00:11:51.879
number of customers grow in space.
214
00:11:52.360 --> 00:11:57.120
I'm making comparison which don't make any sense, but for me,
215
00:11:57.679 --> 00:11:59.879
that makes sense. You know, it's a bit EV charging
216
00:12:00.600 --> 00:12:04.039
and EV's but a good thing is now the EV's
217
00:12:04.080 --> 00:12:07.399
already in space, so you arrived with your EV charging
218
00:12:07.799 --> 00:12:12.960
satellite charging. So the economics, let's say one of your boxes,
219
00:12:13.039 --> 00:12:15.879
because I don't know ten million for the sake of
220
00:12:16.039 --> 00:12:20.080
the argument, maybe it's one. Maybe I don't know, how
221
00:12:20.120 --> 00:12:22.919
confident are you that you're going to say, say a
222
00:12:23.000 --> 00:12:26.039
million a year? How does the economics of one of
223
00:12:26.039 --> 00:12:27.039
your box works?
224
00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:30.039
I love the comparison to the EV chargic network.
225
00:12:30.679 --> 00:12:31.279
One of the.
226
00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:33.679
Things that I'm proud of that in the way that
227
00:12:33.720 --> 00:12:36.480
we've designed this is that the way we send the
228
00:12:36.600 --> 00:12:40.159
energy is compatible with sort of the existing gas cap
229
00:12:40.440 --> 00:12:43.480
that'sllites have, like with their existing solo right, we don't
230
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:47.039
have this Tesla plug design versus the next plug design
231
00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:50.000
kind of war going on there. But to your question
232
00:12:50.039 --> 00:12:52.519
of you know, how confident are we in the economics
233
00:12:52.519 --> 00:12:55.639
of it? One of the first things I did when
234
00:12:55.679 --> 00:12:59.320
we started this company was just call a whole bunch
235
00:12:59.320 --> 00:13:01.879
of my friend the space industry. This is actually the
236
00:13:01.919 --> 00:13:05.320
third space company that I have fled or scaled. Then
237
00:13:05.360 --> 00:13:07.639
the first two had quite good outcome. I was the
238
00:13:07.679 --> 00:13:09.960
CEO of a company called Made in Space, which was
239
00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:11.879
the first company to three print off the face of
240
00:13:11.919 --> 00:13:13.919
the planet, and built that up and sold that quite
241
00:13:13.960 --> 00:13:17.320
successfully in twenty twenty. And then I was the chief
242
00:13:17.320 --> 00:13:20.519
operating officer of red Wire through taking that company public
243
00:13:20.559 --> 00:13:23.159
and now it's a couple billion dollar firm. And so
244
00:13:23.600
--> 00:13:27.600
I called CEOs of space station companies, coos, remote sensing
245
00:13:27.639 --> 00:13:31.600
companies and tele communications companies and described what we wanted
246
00:13:31.600 --> 00:13:34.879
to build, described the ambition, and every single one of
247
00:13:34.879 --> 00:13:38.120
those prepol said, hey, this is really cool. I would
248
00:13:38.200 --> 00:13:40.159
use it this way like I would use it like
249
00:13:40.200 --> 00:13:42.600
in the way that you suggested, and hear other use cases,
250
00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:44.360
and so that gave us a lot of confidence. And
251
00:13:44.399 --> 00:13:48.200
then from there we've gone and actually gotten forty letters
252
00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:51.480
of intent signed by basically every flavor of space company.
253
00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:54.919
It's several billion dollars potential contract value associated with that.
254
00:13:55.159 --> 00:13:57.879
And then we even converted seven of those two power
255
00:13:57.919 --> 00:14:01.120
purchase agreements where folks that pay us a deposit to
256
00:14:01.279 --> 00:14:03.720
lock in the power rates contemplated in their letters of
257
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:07.120
intent for a period of years. So that plus the
258
00:14:07.159 --> 00:14:08.759
work that we've been able to do with the US
259
00:14:08.879 --> 00:14:12.679
government gives us really high confidence that the Economics Pencil
260
00:14:12.720 --> 00:14:15.480
out not only on a per spacecraft basis, but for
261
00:14:15.559 --> 00:14:18.320
the overall TAM and the overall constellation.
262
00:14:18.879 --> 00:14:21.120
Andrew can I also just to ask a little bit
263
00:14:21.120 --> 00:14:23.960
about data centers in space, and I know they're not
264
00:14:24.039 --> 00:14:27.080
necessarily doing that, but I can imagine if they do
265
00:14:27.240 --> 00:14:29.960
take off, this is just a huge market, a huge
266
00:14:29.960 --> 00:14:32.399
opportunity for you, right, So what's your views on that
267
00:14:32.600 --> 00:14:34.879
and how do you fit into it? And I just
268
00:14:34.879 --> 00:14:37.799
actually just look to hear generally how you see the
269
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:39.519
success possibilities.
270
00:14:40.080 --> 00:14:44.759
I'll lead off by saying, essentially every orbital data center
271
00:14:45.360 --> 00:14:48.639
startup has signed either a letter of intent or a
272
00:14:48.639 --> 00:14:52.039
power prise agreement with us because it's this interesting like
273
00:14:52.120 --> 00:14:57.799
symbiotic relationship there that they know power is the key thing,
274
00:14:58.200 --> 00:15:02.519
and for us it represents huge upside potential. We recently
275
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:06.240
closed a series a round of sixty five million dollars,
276
00:15:06.279 --> 00:15:08.720
which is one of the largest series as for space
277
00:15:08.759 --> 00:15:14.000
technology company ever and that was before SpaceX went public
278
00:15:14.120 --> 00:15:17.960
on a thesis of building data centers in space, and
279
00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:21.559
so there's even more kind of upside that we see there.
280
00:15:22.200 --> 00:15:25.679
In general, the thing that's interesting about data centers in
281
00:15:25.720 --> 00:15:27.840
space is if you kind of break it down into
282
00:15:28.279 --> 00:15:31.159
use cases. The most near term use case for compute
283
00:15:31.159 --> 00:15:34.799
in space is just GPUs to do high speed processing
284
00:15:34.919 --> 00:15:37.919
and inference and AI analysis of things and then providing
285
00:15:37.960 --> 00:15:41.879
that data and providing insights to folks, not just raw data.
286
00:15:42.039 --> 00:15:46.279
That's something that's happening now on satellites. What I believe
287
00:15:46.600 --> 00:15:50.480
the near slash medium term use case for data centers
288
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:53.480
in space like that actually underpins the thesis of them
289
00:15:53.840 --> 00:15:55.120
is the fact that.
290
00:15:55.039 --> 00:15:57.279
We are moving a lot of.
291
00:15:57.200 --> 00:16:01.080
Telecommunications into the space layer. Your cell phone, if it's
292
00:16:01.159 --> 00:16:04.639
less than like two generations old, probably has the capacity
293
00:16:04.799 --> 00:16:07.559
to send text messages or other data through a satellite,
294
00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:11.399
like directly to a satellite, and that brings satellites kind
295
00:16:11.399 --> 00:16:14.519
of into the telecommunications tapestry of the planet, and so
296
00:16:15.039 --> 00:16:20.480
services that benefit from being geographically close to that telecommunications tapestry.
297
00:16:20.679 --> 00:16:25.919
So think like inference nodes, think content distribution networks. Those
298
00:16:26.000 --> 00:16:29.320
things make sense to put in space where they're geographically
299
00:16:29.600 --> 00:16:35.559
close to Starling satellites, Amazon satellites, ast mobile satellites. Now
300
00:16:35.679 --> 00:16:38.200
the longer term, it will data centers be as cheap
301
00:16:38.240 --> 00:16:40.000
to put in space as they are to build on
302
00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:43.679
the ground. That is a maybe it's not a today
303
00:16:43.679 --> 00:16:46.879
thing it's a good marketing ploy for the SpaceX S one.
304
00:16:47.279 --> 00:16:49.480
I don't think it's going to be realistic that it's
305
00:16:49.519 --> 00:16:51.519
going to be as cheap to put a data center
306
00:16:51.559 --> 00:16:53.120
in space in two or three years as it is
307
00:16:53.159 --> 00:16:53.919
de bulod plant.
308
00:16:54.440 --> 00:16:57.480
So I've done a bit of a back and on
309
00:16:57.639 --> 00:17:00.600
the loop calculation. You get it if I'm or wrong.
310
00:17:01.039 --> 00:17:04.319
If you put a one gigat orbital data center, it
311
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:08.200
requires one hundred thousand tons of hardware, and even if
312
00:17:08.200 --> 00:17:12.279
we use the
starship level pricing, which is two hundred pakido,
313
00:17:13.480 --> 00:17:15.519
the cost of that data center is going to be
314
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:19.799
forty trillion dollar, which is the GDP of the US,
315
00:17:20.440 --> 00:17:23.799
knowing that on Earth one gigaba data center costs two
316
00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:26.119
hundred times less. Am I wrong?
317
00:17:27.240 --> 00:17:30.960
The reporting that I have seen for a one gigawatt
318
00:17:31.200 --> 00:17:35.119
data center is if you make some fairly aggressive assumptions
319
00:17:35.279 --> 00:17:38.920
about what the spacecraft would cost and what SpaceX is
320
00:17:39.079 --> 00:17:42.799
cost for launches, not the price but their cost, you
321
00:17:42.920 --> 00:17:46.920
get more like one hundred billion. And maybe you get
322
00:17:47.079 --> 00:17:50.400
into like the sixty or eighty billion, but it's more
323
00:17:50.440 --> 00:17:53.000
like one hundred. And I've also seen folks say that
324
00:17:53.680 --> 00:17:56.680
a one gigawatt all up no data center is the
325
00:17:56.759 --> 00:17:59.319
tens of billion of cost depending on where you're building it,
326
00:17:59.440 --> 00:18:00.519
regulatory kind of things.
327
00:18:00.559 --> 00:18:02.559
I think I've seen. That's what I've seen.
328
00:18:03.200 --> 00:18:06.559
So what you're saying is that not my back on
329
00:18:06.759 --> 00:18:10.359
the envelope calculation, but some real experts think that the
330
00:18:10.599 --> 00:18:14.599
price in space is in the current zone of what
331
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:16.359
we're seeing on the land.
332
00:18:17.119 --> 00:18:20.519
To modify that slightly, what I've seen from folks that
333
00:18:20.920 --> 00:18:23.559
are close to the metal here is that they see
334
00:18:23.559 --> 00:18:27.000
a pathway where there might be price parity if you
335
00:18:27.079 --> 00:18:32.440
make assumptions about launch cadence for Starship and real optimization
336
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:36.160
on launch cost for SpaceX to put their own hardware up,
337
00:18:36.240 --> 00:18:38.599
and that they can get the satellites to a very
338
00:18:38.640 --> 00:18:42.759
aggressive cost point. Obviously, Starship is not flying operationally yet
339
00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:46.279
and therefore it's not cost optimized for launch, but it
340
00:18:46.319 --> 00:18:50.000
paints a picture to I think in the five or
341
00:18:50.039 --> 00:18:54.079
ten year timescale that you could achieve a reasonable cost
342
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:56.039
parody if you're totally vertically ingrated.
343
00:18:56.559 --> 00:18:59.960
Andrew, that's fascinating for me to actually hear that, because
344
00:19:00.200 --> 00:19:03.200
maybe I just come back a little bit too, what
345
00:19:03.240 --> 00:19:05.720
are the problems that we see in space? Because I
346
00:19:05.759 --> 00:19:07.759
get the whole idea of a data center in space,
347
00:19:08.000 --> 00:19:09.960
But what are the issues?
What are we missing?
348
00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:13.119
There's a lot of engineering that needs to happen. And look,
349
00:19:13.359 --> 00:19:16.880
I mean, I just I'll just like identify myself as
350
00:19:16.960 --> 00:19:20.880
a space optimist. I believe deeply in the potential that
351
00:19:20.920 --> 00:19:24.119
space has for humanity and for enriching people's lives and
352
00:19:24.200 --> 00:19:28.480
the planet. It's exciting to be talking about new uses
353
00:19:28.519 --> 00:19:31.720
of space. That is what data processing in space is.
354
00:19:31.279 --> 00:19:34.319
It is a new use in space. All that being said,
355
00:19:34.319 --> 00:19:36.119
if you think about a data center on the Earth,
356
00:19:36.519 --> 00:19:41.440
you are constantly maintaining it. You're constantly rebuilding it, putting
357
00:19:41.480 --> 00:19:44.839
the latest and greatest GPUs in GPUs do have a
358
00:19:45.079 --> 00:19:49.119
useful operational life, a useful economic life of several years.
359
00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:53.119
But ten year old GPUs is not commercially viable, so
360
00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:56.839
you have to maintain and upgrade those systems. Obviously, thermal
361
00:19:57.119 --> 00:19:59.680
like heat is a big issue. Now, that's an issue
362
00:19:59.680 --> 00:20:01.920
that we have that on the one hundred kill a
363
00:20:01.920 --> 00:20:05.359
watt scale we have solved in space already, Like the
364
00:20:05.400 --> 00:20:08.440
International Space Station has a thermal control system that's one
365
00:20:08.480 --> 00:20:11.119
hundred hundred feet kill lots. So the size of spacecraft
366
00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:14.039
that folks like SpaceX and others are talking about thermal
367
00:20:14.119 --> 00:20:16.920
has been solved at that class of heat rejection. Now
368
00:20:16.960 --> 00:20:19.000
gig a lot. If you're going to have a thousand
369
00:20:19.079 --> 00:20:21.240
satellites to do that, then you just got to build
370
00:20:21.240 --> 00:20:23.119
a thousand of the systems. If you want to create
371
00:20:23.160 --> 00:20:25.359
one big monel ethic one, there's a whole lot of
372
00:20:25.400 --> 00:20:28.079
other building structures in space, things that you've not done
373
00:20:28.119 --> 00:20:29.519
yet that would need to be solved.
374
00:20:29.839 --> 00:20:32.240
So then my prediction at the beginning of the year,
375
00:20:32.319 --> 00:20:34.400
which was we would have the first data center in
376
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.359
space by the end of the year is probably are
377
00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:37.680
you were going.
378
00:20:37.640 --> 00:20:39.279
To put odds in it? What would you give me?
379
00:20:40.319 --> 00:20:40.559
No?
380
00:20:40.559 --> 00:20:42.799
No, Gerald, you won your bet. You won your bet.
381
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:45.519
That Depending on how you define a data center, it's
382
00:20:45.559 --> 00:20:48.400
already happened. Like Phil Johnson at star Cloud has already
383
00:20:48.400 --> 00:20:51.079
put GPUs in space, and I think we did that
384
00:20:51.079 --> 00:20:53.160
in October of last year. If on the other hand,
385
00:20:53.160 --> 00:20:54.440
you're saying, hey, I want to see a gig a
386
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:58.160
lot of power in space or gigle lass like, yeah,
387
00:20:58.200 --> 00:20:59.240
you're you're not going to win that.
388
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:01.359
Bet, all right, Andrew you I've won the bet. So
389
00:21:01.400 --> 00:21:03.160
this is making difference, Thank you very much.
390
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:04.359
If you just answered I won't.
391
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:05.799
That's all right, that's all accounts.
392
00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:08.599
Yeah, so let me explain you how it works with Jah.
393
00:21:08.680 --> 00:21:10.759
So we throw a dots on a wall and then
394
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:13.599
he paints the round around.
395
00:21:13.240 --> 00:21:17.880
Date, so it's bullseye. It's always want time under you've
396
00:21:17.920 --> 00:21:20.880
made my day. That'd be a certaince.
397
00:21:21.880 --> 00:21:24.279
And just maybe to finish off there, maybe talk a
398
00:21:24.319 --> 00:21:26.880
little bit about where you're at now as a company
399
00:21:27.000 --> 00:21:30.240
in terms of real commercial readiness, and then you know
400
00:21:30.359 --> 00:21:33.000
what the next steps are, and then really how do
401
00:21:33.039 --> 00:21:34.960
you see the business in five years time.
402
00:21:35.799 --> 00:21:40.559
Starcatcher has just been an incredibly high velocity run so far,
403
00:21:40.759 --> 00:21:42.799
and the company is two years old, and in those
404
00:21:42.839 --> 00:21:45.839
two years we have gone from three folks with an
405
00:21:45.880 --> 00:21:50.079
idea to fifty strong, and we've threw an it's demonstration
406
00:21:50.279 --> 00:21:54.440
and a series of ground demonstrations proven out the core technology.
407
00:21:54.759 --> 00:21:58.559
Like we broke Darkwol's world record for optical power transmission.
408
00:21:58.880 --> 00:22:01.079
We did this cool demonstration and down at Kennedy Space
409
00:22:01.119 --> 00:22:03.440
Center where they used to land, launch and land the
410
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:06.599
space level and broke that record. We did our first
411
00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:09.839
in space demonstration showing how we locate client satellites in
412
00:22:09.880 --> 00:22:12.160
space and track them so we can BEM energy at them.
413
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:14.359
And then we built our first satellite that's going to
414
00:22:14.440 --> 00:22:18.599
fly soon. So the next steps for US is putting
415
00:22:18.680 --> 00:22:22.240
up a series of satellites to continue to operationalize the technology,
416
00:22:22.640 --> 00:22:25.240
and then by the end of the decade having operational
417
00:22:25.319 --> 00:22:29.119
capacity to start servicing the gigawatts of power command that
418
00:22:29.240 --> 00:22:32.559
are currently
unmet in space. And really, if I look
419
00:22:32.640 --> 00:22:35.640
out ten years from now, what Starcutcher look like, what
420
00:22:35.680 --> 00:22:38.839
does space look like? I'm really excited actually for the
421
00:22:38.920 --> 00:22:41.400
things I can't predict, because I think that what we
422
00:22:41.519 --> 00:22:45.839
are building, in combination with the increased availability of low
423
00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:50.519
cost launch, really forms the infrastructure the foundation that all
424
00:22:50.599 --> 00:22:55.200
of these other amazing known and knowable but also new
425
00:22:55.279 --> 00:22:59.720
applications are going to come online. This enables five G connectivity.
426
00:23:00.079 --> 00:23:02.920
We're on the planet like literally anywhere without cell towers,
427
00:23:02.960 --> 00:23:06.160
like to just a normal phone. This enables in space
428
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:10.640
manufacturing at scale, enables or data centers at scale and
429
00:23:10.759 --> 00:23:14.240
at reasonable prices, and all of that then just allows
430
00:23:14.319 --> 00:23:16.640
us to kind of go further out from a commercial
431
00:23:16.680 --> 00:23:20.000
and an exploration and a national global security perspective.
432
00:23:20.640 --> 00:23:24.920
When Andrew, as you say in Star Trek, Peace and prosperity,
433
00:23:25.599 --> 00:23:29.119
live long and prosper live long and prosper.
434
00:23:30.359 --> 00:23:31.799
I prefer baby Up, Scottie.
435
00:23:34.279 --> 00:23:36.079
They're both strongs a lot.
436
00:23:36.480 --> 00:23:37.160
That's brilliant.
437
00:23:37.480 --> 00:23:39.480
Thanks so much. Yeah, thanks folks.
438
00:24:05.680 --> 00:24:09.119
Mind blowing, Laurente, mind blowing. Really, it's just the speed
439
00:24:09.759 --> 00:24:12.720
of change, the speed of innovation. It's just hard to
440
00:24:12.799 --> 00:24:13.559
keep up with everything.
441
00:24:14.599 --> 00:24:20.799
What is exciting it is the America. I love, ambitious, fearless, innovative.
442
00:24:21.440 --> 00:24:24.200
You won't find this in any other country. So that's
443
00:24:24.440 --> 00:24:28.559
my admiration. The fact that you can raise almost one
444
00:24:28.640 --> 00:24:32.359
hundred million dollars for his plan and the only ecosystem
445
00:24:33.000 --> 00:24:38.359
around him with NASA, with SpaceX, with Amazon. The advance
446
00:24:38.519 --> 00:24:41.640
that the US are taken in the space economy is
447
00:24:42.039 --> 00:24:45.200
absolutely phenomenon. Whether or not we're going to put that
448
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:48.119
at center in space, there will be a space economy,
449
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:51.319
and I think that the niche that Andrew is trying
450
00:24:51.400 --> 00:24:55.359
to carve is brilliant because those that the light need energy.
451
00:24:55.799 --> 00:24:58.720
Laurent what you actually said was that will be there already.
452
00:24:58.839 --> 00:25:02.920
ISS satellites up there already, So there is a booming
453
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:04.000
business in this area.
454
00:25:04.119 --> 00:25:06.200
But I think the point we're making is we're only
455
00:25:06.279 --> 00:25:07.400
the beginnings of this, right.
456
00:25:08.279 --> 00:25:10.920
There is something we need to track very closely. Is
457
00:25:11.839 --> 00:25:18.599
not Starcatcher, which is Andrew's company. It's another project called Suncatcher,
458
00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:23.640
and that's a joint venture between Google and SpaceX. There's
459
00:25:23.680 --> 00:25:26.880
been a lot of report in the press that together
460
00:25:27.599 --> 00:25:32.000
they're going to accelerate the launch of data center satellites exactly,
461
00:25:32.279 --> 00:25:35.079
So I'm with you on that. So it's not science
462
00:25:35.119 --> 00:25:39.079
fiction and it's going to arrive much faster than we think.
463
00:25:39.960 --> 00:25:41.119
Absolutely. Listen.
464
00:25:41.359 --> 00:25:43.960
We were laughing in terms of Star Trek and stuff
465
00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:46.759
like that, but Star Trek might have been forty years ago,
466
00:25:47.400 --> 00:25:50.680
but it finally feels as if it's becoming a reality.
467
00:25:50.880 --> 00:25:55.519
Right, Okay, job really, Bizzard, and I'll talk to you
468
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:56.079
next week.
469
00:25:56.279 --> 00:25:56.759
Look forward.
470
00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:01.319
Thank you for listening to Redefining Energy. Don't forget to
471
00:26:01.440 --> 00:26:06.079
rate the show and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or
472
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:07.599
the platform of your choice.