PROMOTED

ABOUT THIS EPISODE

This recording is from a panel discussion on understanding and reducing the consequence side of the risk equation (risk = consequence * likelihood). Joining me in this discussion are:

The two gentleman begin by explaining their respective consequence based risk assessment and risk management, and the diagrams they refer to are below.

INL CCE Approach In One Slide

aeSolutions CyberPHA Approach In One Slide

After the initial descriptions we discuss:

  • how the two approaches are similar and different?
  • how long it takes to perform a CCE or CyberPHA?
  • what are some of the novel consequence reduction solutions?
  • the difference between disruption and destruction as a consequence?
  • will the CyberPHA be integrated into the PHA?

Links

This episode was sponsored by CyberX. Founded by military cyber experts with nation-state expertise defending critical infrastructure, CyberX has developed an end-to-end platform for continuous ICS threat monitoring and risk mitigation.

Check out the 2019 CyberX GlobaICS and IIoT Risk Reportthe CyberX report on the NIS Directive, and my podcast from last year on the report with Phil Neray.

English
United States
PROMOTED

TRANSCRIPT

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dale Peterson: ICS Security Catalyst and S4 Conference Chair, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.

EDIT

Thank you for helping to keep the podcast database up to date.
PROMOTED
ELSEWHERE

RECOMMENDATIONS