TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:04
Speaker 1: From the Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey. It's Wednesday, February four, twenty twenty six. Police are worried there are major security challenges surrounding next week's visit by Israeli President Isaac Hertzog. He will visit Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne and copse embracing for pro Palestine rallies and demonstrations. That mean every event has to have a detailed evacuation plan and a way to keep Jewish community members safe. That's an exclusive live now at Beaustralian dot com dot au. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison faces new accusations he froze out and victimized a senior staffer after the rape of Brittany Higgins. It comes from Fiona Brown, whose career was destroyed by false allegations from Higgins that she tried to cover up the rape. Now Brown says, in a statement of claim lodged with the Federal Court that the former PM's top advisors gagged her and that she felt frightened and intimidated by Morrison's actions. That's today's story. When Brittaney Higgins in twenty twenty one, told her story of having been raped inside Parliament House two years earlier, allegedly by fellow staff of Bruce Lahman. It wasn't just a story of rape. It was the tale of how she was pressured by senior government figures not to pursue the story for fear of damaging Scott Morrison's chances of reelection, And so I would.
00:01:40
Speaker 2: I would try and raise it, and I would try and bring it up.
00:01:42
Speaker 3: Then it was always it always sort of came back to sort of being a mere issue.
00:01:47
Speaker 2: And I say, if you can't deal with it, then you can leave.
00:01:51
Speaker 1: Morrison initially tried to tough it out, but quickly buckled under immense public pressure to seem as if he understood.
00:02:00
Speaker 4: Jenny and I spoke last night and she said to me, you have to think about this as a father first. What would you want to happen if it were our girls? Jenny has a way of clarifying things, always has.
00:02:25
Speaker 1: It wasn't enough for Higgins. I didn't want his sympathy as a father.
00:02:31
Speaker 4: I wanted him to use his power as Prime minister.
00:02:35
Speaker 1: Nor for activist Grace Tame, who rode a wave of public anger and what were seen as Morrison's failings.
00:02:43
Speaker 3: On the seventeenth of August last year, not five months after being named Australian of the Year, I received a threatening phone call from a senior member of a government funded organization asking for my word that I wouldn't say anything damning about the Prime Minister, you know, with an election coming soon.
00:03:10
Speaker 1: And in Parliament the then Labor opposition tried to make the most of the rage. Does the Minister accept that Miss Higgins felt pressured not to proceed. In her original Project interview, Brittany Higgins described in detail the actions she said constituted pressure from her former bosses, Minister Linda Reynolds and Chief of Staff Fiona Brown, minimizing and ignoring her rape.
00:03:36
Speaker 5: She made me in that program with the Project, more of the villain than Bruce Lahman. I was framed as the perpetrator in that interview.
00:03:48
Speaker 1: This is Fiona Brown talking to the Australians Stephen Rice and Janet Albretson in twenty twenty three.
00:03:55
Speaker 5: All you have is your name. That's what you come in with, is what you go out with your name, and so that's what I did.
00:04:04
Speaker 1: The Federal Court has found that on the balance of probabilities. Brittany Higgins was raped by Bruce Laman, a charge he denies. Justice Michael Lee also found there was no evidence of a conspiracy to cover up the rape, a finding backed in a separate court proceeding by West Australian Supreme Court Judge Paul Tottle, who said this of Higgins, we've used a voice actor to bring you his words.
00:04:30
Speaker 2: The defendant had persuaded herself there had been a cover up, even though that conclusion was not supported by the facts.
00:04:40
Speaker 1: Fiona Brown has always told a very different story. Brown says that when she realized something had happened late at night to Brittney Higgins, she personally walked Higgins to the police office within Parliament House and offered her counseling and assistance. In the Federal Court trial, Brown gave evidence that instead of covering up the rape, Linda Reynolds had ordered Brown to go to the police, but that Brown resisted, saying she wanted to support Higgins, who at that time was saying she didn't want cops involved. And now Fiona Brown has filed papers of her own in the Federal Court in which she tells a remarkable story that brings it all back around to Scott Morrison. Stephen Rice is The Australian's New South Wales editor, Ricey. We rarely get an insight into how government at the most senior levels operates. This is a pretty secret world. Fiona Brown paints a picture of the Prime Minister's office in panic when they first started hearing that stories were coming about Britney Higgins. How according to Fiona Brown in her statement of claim, did the staff in Morrison's office react to her and ask her to behave.
00:05:54
Speaker 2: Well, they reacted very badly as far as Fiona was concerned. They wanted to shut the whole thing down, and they appear to have felt that the best way to get rid of it was to freeze Fiona Brown out of all of it and just take it on themselves to try to kill the story, deal with the story as best they can. But part of their feeling seems to be, at least what they were telling her was it'll all go away, don't worry about it. These things don't last. Even without the benefit of hindsight. That was, you know, for some pretty experienced media hands. They clearly didn't have any idea how to deal with something of this magnitude.
00:06:40
Speaker 1: In almost the most surprising of ways, Ricey. This is coming back around to Scott Morrison. The allegation from Brittany Higgins, which Morrison has always denied, was that there was
Load full transcript
a cover up at the highest levels and it was all about making sure Scott Morrison got reelected. Brown and Linda Reynolds have said and two courts have agreed that they were not part of any conspiracy at all. But what Fiona Brown is describing is senior staff who were reacting to this as a political story, weren't they They were.
00:07:09
Speaker 2: I mean, let's get one thing very clear that neither Linda Reynolds nor Fiona Brown was involved in any kind of cover up, and that's been established now by two very senior judges. But it does appear that when this story broke, there were senior people in the Morrison government who were prepared to I won't say go to any lengths, but who I think acted from what Fiona Brown is saying, who acted poorly in the way that they dealt with this. And part of that was that they literally froze Fiona Brown out of the whole process. They wouldn't let her in on their meetings. They asked her for her evidence, but then apparently didn't do anything with it. At times, it seems they actually hid questions from her that were being asked by the media. For what reason, who knows, but it didn't give her any opportunity to respond. I mean, not forget. There was a conflagration going on outside. The media was hounding her. There were questions being asked under parliamentary privilege in Parliament that completely skewered Fiona Brown as having in some way connived in or overlooked the rape of Britney Higgins for political reasons. It was a very febrile atmosphere and Fiona Brown was really given no chance at all to present her side of the story.
00:08:46
Speaker 1: Especially when Fiona Brown's story, as she has always maintained it, this is her version of events, was good for the government, according to her. She took Brittany Higgins to the police office in Parliament House she encouraged. She in fact received warm text messages from Britney Higgins thanking her for her help. You've been around politics and around journalism for a long time, Ricey. We've seen what happens when politicians don't know how to respond, But it seems very unusual that they would not reveal information at that stage that would have helped them.
00:09:22
Speaker 2: Look, it doesn't make sense. I find it inexplicable that you had these very seasoned political operatives in Morrison's office who had a good message to sell. It was Fiona Brown who had led Britney Higgins down to the AFP office in Parliament House to report this. As you say, they had a glowing text that Brittany had sent to Fiona Brown only a couple of months after the incident, which was absolutely praising Fiona for the great help that she'd given her during that whole period. They had that in their hands. Why didn't they offer that to the media. They didn't Scott.
00:10:04
Speaker 1: Morrison as the kind of lightning rod for rage and anger about this whole issue. I think it was treated a little bit unfairly in some public discourse. You know, he was slated for saying, oh, I talked
to Jenny, and Jenny talked me through why this was significant. I think he was reacting like many middle aged men might, a little bit clumsily in his language, but there's no suggestion that he didn't actually grasp that a rape was bad or was serious. But it's Scott Morrison's interactions with Fiona Brown that are odd and interesting if we had to believe what she says in her statement of claim. Fiona Brown says that Morrison initially shunned her completely, then said publicly that he had spoken to her, and then, according to her, kind of lent on her to make that true, even though it wasn't.
00:10:55
Speaker 2: Said we've spoken, haven't we, When she says that was absolutely untrue. They had never done that, and she says that she was intimidated by that. She immediately agreed and she was bewildered. She actually didn't know what was happening at that point until she thought about it afterwards and realized that he was trying to put into her mouth something that didn't actually happen.
00:11:23
Speaker 1: Coming up more of my conversation with Stephen Rice. Now, of course Scott Morrison has always denied wrongdoing. This is a statement of claim, so she gets to have her say. We're not going to hear his side of the story for a very long time until and if this matter makes its way to court. But this is part of a fair work claim by Fiona Brown against the Commonwealth. What does she want.
00:11:57
Speaker 2: She wants an acknowledgment that she was wronged by the government. In legal terms, she wants the court to find that there was a breach of the Fair Work Act, that the Commonwealth did not live up to its responsibilities to keep her safe in her working environment, and she wants some damages for that. Let's not forget that her life was destroyed by this whole episode. She hasn't been able to work since, her mental health in particular has been devastated, so she's hoping to get some justice out of this case.
00:12:38
Speaker 1: The Commonwealth is, though robustly defending this with some pretty expensive lawyers on they.
00:12:43
Speaker 2: Extraordinary the amount of money that they have thrown at defending this case. It would be remarkable enough anyway, even if you didn't contrast it to the amount of scrutiny that they gave to the two point four million dollars that they gave to Britney Higgins, which was no scrutiny at all. And part of Fiona Brown's claim is that she was further damaged because she was never given an opportunity to challenge the settlement that Britney Higgins got. Most people after that thought, well she got two point four million dollars. Her story must have been right, her story must have been examined properly, and therefore the allegations against Fiona Brown must be true. All of this just multiplied in terms of the damage that it was doing to Fiona Brown.
00:13:44
Speaker 1: Stephen Rice is The Australian's new South Wales editor. You can read this story and all Rice is reporting right now at the Australian dot com. Do reju