TRANSCRIPT 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.120
A glass of red wine with dinner is good for the heart.
00:00:03.359 --> 00:00:06.240
A little liquid courage helps us connect.
00:00:06.400 --> 00:00:09.519
A glass of champagne is the perfect way to celebrate.
00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:14.960
Drinking socially, medicinally, and occasionally have all long been a part of human culture.
00:00:15.119 --> 00:00:17.679
As the saying goes, all things in moderation.
00:00:17.920 --> 00:00:20.960
But as they also say, the devil is in the details.
00:00:21.120 --> 00:00:30.640
My next guest is an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Senior Medical Director for Substance Use Disorder at Mass General Brigham.
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:36.799
She is also the author of Treatable Rethinking Addiction and How to Get Care Right.
00:00:37.119 --> 00:00:43.439
Today, she's going to help unpack the tangled mess of stigma, medical rumor, and human connection.
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:46.560
As we ask the question, is moderation a myth?
00:00:46.799 --> 00:00:49.679
This is the Curious Introvert Podcast with me, Meredith.
00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:53.600
Around here we explore taboo questions and societal blind spots.
00:00:53.759 --> 00:01:00.240
Please help me welcome the woman working to destigmatize beverage choice, addiction physician, Dr.
00:01:00.399 --> 00:01:01.439
Sarah Wakeman.
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:02.399
Thanks for being here.
00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:03.759
Thanks for having me.
00:01:04.079 --> 00:01:13.120
So I feel like when it comes to assessing our own alcohol use, we all pretty much have the measuring accuracy of fishermen.
00:01:14.719 --> 00:01:15.359
You know?
00:01:15.680 --> 00:01:20.560
So what do you see people considering as moderate drinking?
00:01:20.719 --> 00:01:25.439
Is it they don't visibly get drunk or that drinking doesn't interfere with their job?
00:01:25.599 --> 00:01:28.079
How are most people measuring moderation?
00:01:28.400 --> 00:01:34.799
So it's hard to measure how much you're drinking if you're not sure what are sort of health-related benchmarks to think about, or even what is one drink.
00:01:34.959 --> 00:01:39.680
You know, you can go to one restaurant and one drink can look one way, or at home you may have a glass that's a different size.
00:01:39.760 --> 00:01:42.879
And I think for many people, it's not widely discussed or talked about.
00:01:43.040 --> 00:01:46.480
And then people's sense of what's normal is just heavily influenced by what's around them.
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:51.680
And so we tend to measure ourselves based on people in our lives or our social context or how we grew up.
00:01:51.840 --> 00:01:57.200
And alcohol use can vary tremendously by social circles, by background and context.
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:01.040
And so what is normal in one group may be very different in another group.
00:02:01.120 --> 00:02:04.799
And none of that is necessarily benchmarked to what we would recommend from a health standpoint.
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:07.439
So, in other words, they're just not thinking about it.
00:02:08.319 --> 00:02:13.759
Well, I would say more and more people are having this conversation and there's a lot more attention than there used to be.
00:02:13.840 --> 00:02:16.560
But I think, yeah, I think historically people haven't really thought about it.
00:02:16.639 --> 00:02:22.159
And honestly, the science is confusing and the messaging from public health has been really confusing.
00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:26.560
It's an area that's evolved a lot, but also it's a tough thing to study in an accurate way.
00:02:26.639 --> 00:02:33.039
And so I think therefore, you know, you can read one article saying one thing and a few years later see something that seems to say the exact opposite.
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:35.919
And that sometimes leaves people just totally confused.
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:36.879
Exactly.
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:56.800
Like the CDC I read says that moderation is measured by one drink a day for women and two drinks a day for men, while the WHO says alcohol is not safe at any use level and it's a class one carcinogen.
00:02:57.120 --> 00:03:00.159
Why would those two health organizations measure that differently?
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:02.080
So they're sort of both right.
00:03:02.240 --> 00:03:04.240
So alcohol is considered a carcinogen.
00:03:04.479 --> 00:03:06.159
So is sunlight and so is meat.
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:13.919
So there are many things that we incorporate into a healthy lifestyle that don't have to be an all or nothing that do, in fact, are known to cause cancer.
00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:15.360
And that's true with alcohol for sure.
00:03:15.439 --> 00:03:19.360
And it's known to cause cancer, is associated with higher risk of cancer the more you drink.
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:26.319
And so I think the challenge is taking these very nuanced scientific findings and then making it easily understood to the public.
00:03:26.479 --> 00:03:35.199
And in that translation, I think the nuance gets lost and different groups have come down in different perspectives in terms of how they've portrayed that evidence to the general public.
00:03:35.599 --> 00:03:45.759
In my non-clinical mind, when someone announces that a substance is a class one carcinogen, that is like a big red X over that thing.
00:03:45.919 --> 00:03:48.560
But I never thought, like, oh yeah, well, so is sunlight.
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:49.840
You know?
00:03:50.479 --> 00:03:56.960
So am I interpreting and internalizing that information in too much of an extreme way?
00:03:57.120 --> 00:03:59.280
Or yeah, am I doing this wrong?
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:00.879
I don't think you're doing anything wrong.
00:04:00.960 --> 00:04:04.319
I think you're probably reading more than many people are and trying to understand the truth.
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:06.240
I actually think the messaging is what's confusing.
00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:12.080
You don't really
Load full transcript
hear the government saying sunlight is a carcinogen or even, you know, that bacon is a carcinogen.
00:04:12.319 --> 00:04:15.840
And so I do think that's a little bit of a hard thing to interpret.
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:16.639
What does that really mean?
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:22.399
Because I agree when I hear something described as a class of carcinogen, I would think, oh God, I should never ever be exposed to that.
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:26.720
But the reality is the science is a little bit more mixed than that when it comes to alcohol.
00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:28.160
Oh, interesting.
00:04:28.319 --> 00:04:28.639
Okay.
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:38.879
So that's where the whole nuance and difficulty of studying something like this in that sort of lifestyle bucket becomes a little messy, right?
00:04:39.120 --> 00:04:40.000
It's so messy.
00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:47.360
Cause if you think about how we do scientific research studies for other things, the gold standard is something called a randomized controlled trial.
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:56.480
And so what happens there is that researchers would randomly assign people to two different groups, and one group would get the thing that you want to study the effect of and the other group wouldn't.
00:04:56.639 --> 00:04:58.240
But you really can't do that with alcohol.
00:04:58.399 --> 00:05:05.920
You can't like randomly assign people to drink for the next 20 years and the other group to not drink for the next 20 years and then actually understand what happens.
00:05:06.160 --> 00:05:12.240
And the outcomes that we care about, things like death and cancer and heart disease, really do take 20, 30 years to accumulate.
00:05:12.319 --> 00:05:18.319
So you can't do sort of a short study where someone maybe would agree to not drink and be in a control group for that time period.
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:33.040
And so scientists are left with really big observational studies, which is how a lot of public health data is done, that generally leverage other studies that have followed people for decades, where people were asked about their drinking habits as a part of that study.
00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:40.399
And then based on that, they try to control for different factors and understand is there an association between alcohol and certain outcomes.
00:05:40.639 --> 00:05:49.120
But that's a much more imperfect science than knowing I just administered, you know, 10 ounces of alcohol to this person every day for 20 years and this was the outcome.
00:05:49.360 --> 00:05:50.959
We really don't have that kind of data.
00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:55.360
And so I think it's a combination of the science that exists is somewhat messy.
00:05:55.439 --> 00:05:57.360
But then two, the findings differ.
00:05:57.439 --> 00:06:04.160
So if you're looking at cancer, the outcomes are actually different than if you're looking at overall mortality or risk of death or heart disease.
00:06:04.319 --> 00:06:09.279
So it is not a simple thing
to understand or to try to explain in public health messaging.
00:06:09.519 --> 00:06:16.639
No, it totally isn't, which makes your job super challenging because that educational piece is part of what you do.
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:18.079
Obviously, we're here today.
00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:19.360
You wrote a book about it.
00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:27.279
And I want to come back to that unpacking the study details of the health outcomes of alcohol in a minute.
00:06:27.360 --> 00:06:36.079
But I I want to go back to the topic of moderation, because when asked, most people will say, Oh yeah, I drink in moderation.
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:40.800
And I'm wondering how that is different than gray area drinking.
00:06:40.959 --> 00:06:43.360
Can you help differentiate the two?
00:06:43.759 --> 00:06:48.160
So it's confusing, and different organizations have changed their stance on this over time.
00:06:48.319 --> 00:06:53.439
But for a long time, we went by in the US, by the NIAA drinking risk limits.
00:06:53.519 --> 00:07:03.519
And their recommendation or sort of definitions were that lower risk drinking was seven or fewer drinks per week for a woman or anyone over 65 and no more than three drinks on a drinking occasion.
00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:07.759
So you couldn't sort of save up all seven for Saturday and still be in that lower risk category.
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:13.120
And then for men under 65, it was 14 drinks a week and no more than four per drinking occasion.
00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:18.240
So if you have, you know, six drinks on one occasion, that is considered sort of a binge drinking episode.
00:07:18.319 --> 00:07:23.680
But it doesn't necessarily mean that you have alcohol use disorder, which we'll talk about, which is what we think of as addiction.
00:07:23.839 --> 00:07:30.240
It just means that above those lower risk limits, in the studies that we have, we've seen evidence that health risks start to accumulate.
00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:38.079
And so that can be things like um cancer, high blood pressure and heart problems and acid reflux, sort of more mundane medical problems.
00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:44.879
And so they with the best evidence we have from these large survey studies, they sort of set these thresholds of what they think are lower risk strengthening limits.
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:47.199
And so when I think that's kind of the best we have.
00:07:47.360 --> 00:07:49.120
So I'm giving guidance to patients.
00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:56.639
That's sort of the general rule of thumb I try to keep in mind is, you know, as a woman, seven or fewer a week and no more than three on a drinking occasion.
00:07:56.720 --> 00:08:01.439
And as a man under 65, 14 or fewer a week and no more than four on a drinking occasion.
00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:03.920
That does unbeg the question of like what is a drink?
00:08:04.079 --> 00:08:05.839
Because that's the other piece of that equation.
00:08:05.920 --> 00:08:11.920
So if you have, you know, a drink
is a bottle of wine, that would that would not count and would be over the recommended amount.
00:08:12.079 --> 00:08:19.680
So the definitions in the US are that one standard drink is five ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer, or one and a half ounces of liquor.
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:24.240
Five ounces of wine is like, I mean, that is a tiny glass.
00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:25.439
It's a small four.
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:26.000
Yes.
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:26.560
Yeah.
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:27.680
A small four.
00:08:27.759 --> 00:08:28.000
Yeah.
00:08:28.399 --> 00:08:29.920
Yeah, that's a small four.
00:08:30.160 --> 00:08:39.360
That's what we call like, you know, when you get a flight of beer, I don't know if, or like it's it's basically like a wine tasting, you know, is is five ounces.
00:08:39.519 --> 00:08:39.840
Okay.
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:43.039
So let me repeat that just so that it's in my brain.
00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:51.120
One drink is considered five ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer, or one and a half ounces of liquor.
00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:52.720
So like a one and a half ounce shot.
00:08:52.879 --> 00:08:53.120
Okay.
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:55.360
So like the little glass shot is one and a half.
00:08:55.600 --> 00:08:58.559
The metal one at the bar, that's two.
00:08:59.120 --> 00:08:59.600
There you go.
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:00.080
Exactly.
00:09:00.399 --> 00:09:05.519
So you can see how tricky it is already to measure your drinking, because you know, depending on where you are, these things will look different.
00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:05.840
Yeah.
00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:08.720
I guess the thing I would add, because the goal here is not perfection.
00:09:08.879 --> 00:09:12.320
The goal is thinking about overall health improvement in my mind.
00:09:12.480 --> 00:09:17.519
And so, you know, these recommendations are based on these large studies that ask people, how much do you drink?
00:09:17.679 --> 00:09:20.559
And so that also is very much open to interpretation.
00:09:20.720 --> 00:09:22.799
And so it is not a perfect science.
00:09:23.039 --> 00:09:30.639
So back to the term gray area drinking, is that more of a behavioral distinction or it does it have to do with quantity?
00:09:30.879 --> 00:09:37.279
So if you think of it as a pyramid, you know, then with sort of health risks increasing the further you get to the top of the pyramid.
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:39.279
At the bottom of the pyramid are people who don't drink at all.
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:43.519
You're obviously not going to have any health-related problems if you don't drink alcohol due to alcohol.
00:09:43.840 --> 00:09:50.559
Next is kind of the biggest group, which are people who drink in a way that actually doesn't cause obvious risk to their health or their life.
00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:53.360
And so that's that kind of lower risk or moderation bucket.
00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:54.879
Okay, let's unpack that really quick.
00:09:54.960 --> 00:09:55.360
Hold on.
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:55.919
Oh, yeah.
00:09:56.159 --> 00:09:58.240
It doesn't cause, say it again.
00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:02.080
It doesn't cause negative impact on their life or obviously on their health.
00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:03.679
Okay, let's hang out there for a minute.
00:10:04.240 --> 00:10:07.039
Since this episode is about that department.
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:23.919
And uh, so if somebody goes to the doctor and the doctor says, Hey, your drinking is negatively impacting your health and they choose to drink anyway, would that be more on alcohol use disorder side of things?
00:10:24.159 --> 00:10:25.120
Yeah, great question.
00:10:25.279 --> 00:10:32.879
One of the diagnostic criteria of alcohol use disorder, there's 11 and you have to meet at least two to be diagnosed with a mild alcohol use disorder.
00:10:33.039 --> 00:10:38.240
One is if you have known medical problems related or worsened by alcohol and you continue to drink despite that.
00:10:38.480 --> 00:10:39.279
But that's different.
00:10:39.440 --> 00:10:41.279
There's sort of two things embedded in what you said.
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:44.879
One was a doctor just generally saying you shouldn't drink for health reasons.
00:10:45.039 --> 00:10:48.240
That's very different than a doctor saying you have liver inflammation.
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:54.240
And if you keep drinking alcohol, alcohol is going to cause your liver to get even more injured and for you to develop cirrhosis.
00:10:54.480 --> 00:11:04.639
If you continue to drink despite getting that very personalized medical feedback that alcohol is making a health condition worse for you, that would be sort of one of the criteria towards alcohol use disorder.
00:11:05.279 --> 00:11:05.840
Interesting.
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:06.320
Okay.
00:11:06.799 --> 00:11:09.840
And does it matter why a person drinks?
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:13.120
So, like, say we're hanging out in the moderate zone, right?
00:11:13.360 --> 00:11:13.759
Yeah, yeah.
00:11:14.000 --> 00:11:17.679
But the reason that we drink is specific.
00:11:17.919 --> 00:11:25.440
You know, it could be you feel sad or you feel anxious or you feel angry or I don't know, you feel bored, or you want to socialize?
00:11:25.600 --> 00:11:32.159
Like there's so many reasons that we drink in our culture to celebrate, to mourn, to unwind, to wind up.
00:11:32.720 --> 00:11:33.919
It's a long list.
00:11:34.240 --> 00:11:38.240
Does answering that question matter when it comes to moderate drinking?
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:57.600
It's not something that is on any of our sort of screening tools, but there are studies that have looked at that that people who drink to relieve bad emotions, so like who drink because of sadness or trauma or grief, are at increased risk of ultimately developing an alcohol use disorder compared to people who drink for sort of positive reasons, like drink to socialize, drink to celebrate.
00:11:57.759 --> 00:12:02.480
You know, it's hard to know is that speak to the fact that one of the biggest risk factors for addiction is trauma.
00:12:02.559 --> 00:12:10.159
And so if you're drinking to relieve sadness, you may have sort of pre-existing trauma versus is there something different about that type of behavioral pattern?
00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:21.360
But certainly that is something that would make me as a clinician more worried or sort of would my ears would perk up if someone said that they really drink to relieve depression or sadness or guilt or loneliness.
00:12:21.519 --> 00:12:26.799
That is a riskier situation than someone who's drinking, you know, at a social event with their friends or their family.
00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:35.279
I did a very casual Facebook survey of just personal contact to see, you know, what people do in terms of moderation.
00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:38.240
Do they have specific strategies that work for them?
00:12:38.480 --> 00:12:40.240
Do they have rules that they follow?
00:12:40.399 --> 00:12:45.200
Or is it just kind of a, you know, take it or leave it feeling towards alcohol?
00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:50.799
And the the responses that I got were all over the place, but very passionate.
00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:54.879
A lot of people who had decided to just not drink at all.
00:12:55.039 --> 00:13:02.960
And I'm starting to see, based on your answers here, how just not drinking would be like the drinking version of a capsule wardrobe.
00:13:03.759 --> 00:13:07.519
You know, like how Steve Jobs had all black t-shirts and jeans.
00:13:07.600 --> 00:13:13.200
And so he never had to make a wardrobe decision a day in his life because he just wore black t-shirts and jeans.
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:20.960
I'm starting to see why people kind of exit the mental spinning that involves like, okay, now this is a drink.
00:13:21.039 --> 00:13:23.440
Now that counts as two drinks, and how many have I had?
00:13:23.519 --> 00:13:25.519
And oh, wait, I only do this on the weekend.
00:13:25.679 --> 00:13:26.879
Am I drinking because I'm sad?
00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:28.879
I could see where people would just go, you know what?
00:13:28.960 --> 00:13:30.000
I'm just not gonna do it.
00:13:30.240 --> 00:13:30.639
Totally.
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:34.000
And I think it also depends on what someone's relationship is with alcohol.
00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:42.399
So for, I mean, it's sort of like if you think about food or eating dessert, there's similarities there where for some people it's sort of take it or leave, and it's not that big of a deal.
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:52.720
They eat dessert when they're at an event, but it's not something that they are constantly thinking about or having to resist the urge to eat, or that it sort of consumes their mental energy or decision-making capacity.
00:13:52.879 --> 00:14:04.000
But there's other people who share this concept of like food noise that if you put a bag of cookies on the table, they're gonna be spending most of their mental energy
thinking about whether they should or could or how many cookies they're gonna eat the whole time.
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:05.039
And that's exhausting.
00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:10.799
And so, in that circumstance, some people just say, you know, I'd rather just like not make that decision or not have to deal with it.
00:14:11.200 --> 00:14:13.360
So I think there's a lot of individual nuance here.
00:14:13.679 --> 00:14:20.799
And that again is really tough to sort of talk about or educate about, you know, when we think about these kind of gray zone topics like alcohol use.
00:14:21.120 --> 00:14:34.960
So for those who are moderate drinkers based on CDC guidelines, one drink a day for a woman and two drinks a day for a man, what are the health risks for those folks?
00:14:35.279 --> 00:14:35.840
Great question.
00:14:36.000 --> 00:14:42.559
So I think and and the CDC is sort of an extrapolation of that seven drinks a week for a woman and 14 drinks a week for a man.
00:14:42.639 --> 00:14:44.080
So just averaging it out of birth.
00:14:44.240 --> 00:14:46.559
I have a hard time with the total week count up.
00:14:46.639 --> 00:14:50.480
And so the days are like every day is easier for me.
00:14:50.639 --> 00:14:51.120
I don't know.
00:14:51.440 --> 00:14:53.440
So sorry if that's messing things up.
00:14:53.679 --> 00:14:54.399
No, that's really fun.
00:14:54.559 --> 00:15:05.600
I guess the the thing I would poke into that is that, you know, as people are thinking about how alcohol fits in their life, sometimes it can be helpful to think about having alcohol-free days so that it's not that, you know, alcohol is a part of your everyday life.
00:15:05.679 --> 00:15:09.120
And so in that case, the sort of how many drinks a day can get in the way of that.
00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:12.639
So thinking I could add like seven drinks a week a week-ish.
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:22.080
And so as a woman, you know, two drinks a night for three days or having those kind of benchmarks can be helpful if people are thinking about sort of their own personal practices with alcohol.
00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:31.759
In terms of pelvis, I think the biggest one where there are concerns even with light drinking and there being an association with negative health outcomes, are for certain types of cancer.
00:15:32.080 --> 00:15:42.559
So for most health conditions that alcohol is associated with, thinking of things like fibro disease, heart disease, mortality, the risk really starts to increase as people are drinking more and more.
00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:46.720
And then flexion point of where that is varies depending on what condition you're looking at.
00:15:46.879 --> 00:15:54.000
But for mortality, that sort of light drinking, which would be less than those limits we just talked about, there does not seem to be a negative impact on mortality.
00:15:54.159 --> 00:16:06.399
But once you get above those thresholds that the sort of 14 drinks a week for men, seven drinks a week for
women, depending on what study and what definitions they're using, you stop seeing any sort of reduction in mortality and you actually begin to see an increase.
00:16:06.639 --> 00:16:08.000
For cancer, it's a little different.
00:16:08.080 --> 00:16:14.960
There are some types of cancer, including breast cancer, where even light drinking has been associated with an increased risk of getting breast cancer.
00:16:15.279 --> 00:16:22.879
So if you think of women, that one drink a day, actually, breast cancer, is associated with a very small increased risk of developing breast cancer.
00:16:23.039 --> 00:16:32.799
And so from a cancer perspective, there really is, you know, no amount of drinking that is safe or not associated with an increased risk of these types of cancer like breast.
00:16:32.879 --> 00:16:35.840
And that's probably most relevant, especially for women who are listening.
00:16:36.000 --> 00:16:37.919
That then varies again with your personal history.
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:48.080
So if you're someone who has a strong family history of breast cancer or a personal history of breast cancer, if I were your doctor, I would counsel you very differently around thinking about alcohol use than someone without that risk factor.
00:16:48.159 --> 00:16:56.720
And then people have different preferences around their life and what they value in making health decisions and different risk tolerance as they think about different behaviors in their life.
00:16:56.799 --> 00:17:09.200
And so it really is this situation that is a little exhausting to your point about factoring in all the data, but deciding sort of what matters to you, what's your own health history, and then how do you think about this health-related behavior in the context of that?
00:17:09.519 --> 00:17:16.319
Is it common for a cancer doctor to tell their patient who has cancer to stop drinking alcohol?
00:17:16.559 --> 00:17:22.079
I think cancer doctors are counseling very differently about alcohol than they were 10 years ago before all of this data came out.
00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:27.680
You know, both alcohol and obesity are known risk factors for multiple different types of cancer, including breast cancer.
00:17:27.759 --> 00:17:42.000
And so, you know, I'm not a cancer doctor, but from my colleagues, my sense is that people are talking about alcohol in a different way, especially breast cancer specialists, of thinking about sort of really the less or or no alcohol is the safest option if you're if you're trying to reduce your risk of cancer.
00:17:43.200 --> 00:17:50.559
In other developed countries, the toxic load for people would be less than the US.
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:59.119
And so they might have some of these what we call bad habits, smoking and drinking, and they could have different rates of cancer.
00:17:59.359 --> 00:18:14.480
How do we know that our breast cancer rates, to use this specific example, are specifically due to even moderate alcohol use and not the total toxic load of the country we live in?
00:18:14.799 --> 00:18:15.920
Yeah, great question.
00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:27.599
And this is one of the real limitations of the type of data that exists around alcohol use is that again, we don't have these controlled research environments where we can isolate the specific factor of alcohol.
00:18:27.759 --> 00:18:39.279
So, what researchers try to do in studies is, you know, with breast cancer, for example, they would take a big massive study that followed women for many decades that asked about lots of different health-related behaviors, including alcohol.
00:18:39.359 --> 00:18:47.279
And then they would compare the association between the amount that someone drinks and their risk of ultimately getting breast cancer across those groups.
00:18:47.440 --> 00:18:53.839
And they do this sort of statistical analysis where they try to control for other things that might be contributing to the risk factor.
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:56.000
The issue is we can't control for all those things.
00:18:56.079 --> 00:19:03.279
Like we actually don't measure on these surveys, like, you know, do you live in an area that's more exposed to pesticides or other chemicals?
00:19:03.359 --> 00:19:10.480
Or, you know, they often ask about diet, but they don't ask in that great of a detail about sort of diet or preparation or, you know, many other elements.
00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:13.119
And so the science is imperfect at best.
00:19:13.200 --> 00:19:28.799
I think what they can say is that with the limitations of those types of studies, when you control for things like body weight and exercise and, you know, other health habits like tobacco, you do see this association with increase in alcohol use being associated with increasing rates of cancer.
00:19:29.279 --> 00:19:34.640
There's also the always the possibility of what we call confounders, which means that things travel together.
00:19:34.799 --> 00:19:41.440
So for example, if you didn't control for smoking, you might find that alcohol is associated with this really high risk of lung cancer.
00:19:41.519 --> 00:19:45.039
But then actually you look and you see that people who smoke are also more likely to drink heavily.
00:19:45.119 --> 00:19:49.599
And so you're not actually isolating the effect of alcohol, you're actually measuring the effect of tobacco.
00:19:49.759 --> 00:19:56.960
So that's one of the challenges is the studies are only as good as what inputs of data they have from these surveys and then what things they control for.
00:19:57.359 --> 00:19:59.119
So it really is this imperfect science.
00:19:59.200 --> 00:20:03.839
And I think, like many things, should be just sort of factored in as you're making health-related decisions.
00:20:04.240 --> 00:20:12.640
Does all of this make it particularly difficult for you in your job to help patients stop drinking?
00:20:12.880 --> 00:20:26.480
Because, you know, you it's it's not completely accurate to say, oh, this
100% causes X and Y, but we see a strong correlation and you're so good at it unpacking all these nuanced details.
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:35.200
However, someone who is maybe negatively affected by their drinking habits, so we'll call that like diminished capacity, right?
00:20:35.279 --> 00:20:45.599
They're not feeling well, you know, and maybe there's some, as you said, trauma happening and they're dealing with that, and they're just trying to be like, lady, do I drink or do I not drink?
00:20:45.680 --> 00:20:54.559
And, you know, and you have to explain with accuracy and integrity, medical integrity, oh, well, it could cause this and it could cause that, but we don't exactly know.
00:20:54.799 --> 00:20:58.160
Doesn't that make it a bit difficult for you to really sell it?
00:20:58.400 --> 00:21:04.079
It's actually much simpler when, you know, when you think about addiction, which is what I spend, I do general medicine and also addiction.
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:07.119
So I take care of patients, you know, come in for their annual visit.
00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:10.559
And that's where I'm really talking about sort of the moderation side of things.
00:21:10.799 --> 00:21:17.920
Once someone develops addiction, you know, by definition, at that point, they're drinking in a way that alcohol is causing negative consequences in their life.
00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:24.640
And so in that context, it's not that hard because sort of the horse is out of the barn at that point that however you measure it, alcohol is causing problems to them.
00:21:24.799 --> 00:21:25.119
Yeah.
00:21:25.279 --> 00:21:28.400
I think the nuance or challenge can be that people have different goals.
00:21:28.559 --> 00:21:30.960
So some people's goal is to never drink again.
00:21:31.039 --> 00:21:34.240
And for other people, their goal is to try to drink in a lower risk way.
00:21:34.319 --> 00:21:38.640
And so that is a more nuanced conversation and does vary person to person.
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:45.359
But I actually think the much messier thing to understand is this moderation bucket where, you know, the science is not perfect.
00:21:45.599 --> 00:21:51.039
We do have really good data suggesting some things, and it is this very nuanced conversation.
00:21:51.119 --> 00:21:59.759
And, you know, I asked a dear colleague of mine who's an addiction specialist who's since passed away, but he was an alcohol researcher, you know, someone that I would turn to in the field to ask questions.
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:03.359
And, you know, I would see him drinking a cocktail at dinner or at events.
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:05.920
And so I sort of asked him, like, how how do you think about this?
00:22:06.079 --> 00:22:09.200
Because that, you know, alcohol has been known to be a carcinogen for a long time.
00:22:09.599 --> 00:22:16.960
And he said, you know, I think our problem is that we've been promoting alcohol as sort of a healthy positive behavior as something that improves your health.
00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:21.519
But it's actually a different conversation if you think, can alcohol be a part of a healthy lifestyle?
00:22:21.680 --> 00:22:28.799
So the shift there is a little bit like, I don't think anyone eats a bag of, you know, Skittles thinking they're going to make their health better.
00:22:29.119 --> 00:22:35.759
But many people have a healthy lifestyle and like eat dessert now and again and, you know, eat candy and it's not the end of the world.
00:22:36.000 --> 00:22:38.480
Same thing, you know, with bacon or with sunbathing.
00:22:38.559 --> 00:22:41.519
Like I think everyone knows melanoma can kill you and skin cancer is bad.
00:22:41.599 --> 00:22:44.880
And being out in the sun, you know, increases your risk of skin cancer.
00:22:44.960 --> 00:22:51.519
And yet we still go to the beach and, you know, we wear sunscreen, we kick precautions, but we're able to have a sort of nuanced framework for that.
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:56.480
And I think alcohol's kind of in that bucket where it, you know, for some people is absolutely deadly.
00:22:56.720 --> 00:23:00.079
The more you do of it, probably the more health harms you're going to have related to it.
00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:04.640
And it is possible to incorporate low-risk drinking into an otherwise healthy lifestyle.
00:23:04.880 --> 00:23:05.599
Well, hey there.
00:23:05.759 --> 00:23:13.680
Since you seem to be enjoying this episode so far, double check that you've hit the follow button on your podcast listening app and subscribe on YouTube.
00:23:14.079 --> 00:23:21.119
And to join my free private Facebook group, search MFR Curious Insiders on Facebook or click the link in the show notes.
00:23:21.359 --> 00:23:23.119
Okay, back to the show.
00:23:23.440 --> 00:23:25.519
That's such a great way to explain that.
00:23:25.680 --> 00:23:26.480
And you're right.
00:23:26.720 --> 00:23:30.960
I remember when everyone was singing the praises of resveratrol.
00:23:31.359 --> 00:23:42.640
And in my research for our episode, I learned that in the 1700s there was this hospital in France that used to give two liters of wine per day to its patients.
00:23:42.799 --> 00:23:52.720
And so I thought, okay, well, this is not, you know, a particularly modern phenomenon, but it is a longstanding one, which makes it harder to undo.
00:23:52.880 --> 00:24:05.519
You know, especially when we see these robust centurions drinking their, you know, whatever, brandy at night, or, you know, grandma is drinking her wine at night, and we think, okay, well, it must be fine because it's fine for them.
00:24:05.759 --> 00:24:14.319
But the personalized approach does simplify it because you don't you can't outsource all of your thoughts, you know, to a study.
00:24:14.559 --> 00:24:18.960
As scientific and reliable as the study is, you have to make that decision for yourself.
00:24:19.039 --> 00:24:25.599
And if I'm hearing you right, what you're saying is that's what you help patients walk
through is that individual decision.
00:24:25.920 --> 00:24:26.400
Exactly.
00:24:26.559 --> 00:24:35.920
And I think, you know, for better or worse, that's true of so many health decisions, that there are very few things where we have sort of a black and white answer of, you know, you should absolutely only do it this one way.
00:24:36.079 --> 00:24:37.119
Often it depends.
00:24:37.200 --> 00:24:40.799
And it depends on your own personal history and and other factors.
00:24:40.960 --> 00:24:46.960
And so I think it is simpler to your point of the capsule wardrobe, it's simpler to just be like, tell me what to do and I'm gonna do it.
00:24:47.119 --> 00:24:50.720
But yeah, you know, in this space, it really is sort of an individualized perspective.
00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:51.279
Okay.
00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:58.480
So talk to me about other health risks that are potentialities in with moderate drinking.
00:24:58.640 --> 00:25:00.880
So, how about like, let's talk about the brain?
00:25:01.039 --> 00:25:03.279
What are the impacts of alcohol on the brain?
00:25:03.599 --> 00:25:08.559
Yeah, so the impact of alcohol on the brain depends on the sort of moderate level versus higher risk level.
00:25:08.640 --> 00:25:10.640
I'll start with the easier side, which is a higher level.
00:25:10.799 --> 00:25:16.319
So when people are drinking in a heavy category, we know that when their risk of stroke increases.
00:25:16.400 --> 00:25:19.759
So that obviously has negative, terrible impacts on the brain.
00:25:19.920 --> 00:25:22.799
But also we see an alcohol-related dementia can develop.
00:25:22.880 --> 00:25:33.680
So people can get cognitive impairment over many years of heavy drinking that looks almost like Alzheimer's or another type of dementia where they have just profound cognitive impact from heavy alcohol use.
00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:38.319
How would you know regular dementia from alcohol-induced dementia?
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:41.599
There's not a clear diagnostic way of determining that.
00:25:41.680 --> 00:25:45.920
So dementia is actually a big bucket term, and then there's lots of causes of dementia.
00:25:46.000 --> 00:25:55.440
So people can get dementia from Alzheimer's, they can get dementia from having multiple strokes, they can get dementia from rare causes like frontotemporal dementia.
00:25:55.599 --> 00:26:04.000
So dementia is really sort of the end state that we understand and how we see people who've lost their, you know, are losing their memory and all of the symptoms of dementia.
00:26:04.079 --> 00:26:07.119
But the reason for why someone develops dementia can be varied.
00:26:07.200 --> 00:26:10.640
And with alcohol, it's really based on history and sort of excluding other causes.
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:24.640
So if you see on, you know, on MRI or CAT scan that someone's never had a stroke, you know, they don't have classic findings consistent with Alzheimer's and they have a heavy alcohol use history, it would be sort of attributed to alcohol or alcohol-related dementia.
00:26:25.519 --> 00:26:31.440
I I know someone who has dementia right now and his symptoms get worse when he has a beer.
00:26:31.599 --> 00:26:33.920
Is that pretty normal, pretty common?
00:26:34.240 --> 00:26:43.839
Yeah, if you think alcohol impacts, you know, so many different parts of the brain, it crosses the blood-brain barrier very quickly and can make people more impulsive or, you know, more dysregulated.
00:26:43.920 --> 00:26:50.559
And so if someone already has a neurocognitive disorder or dementia, you know, that can really cause significant symptoms for them.
00:26:51.039 --> 00:26:54.000
Is it true that it reduces the neuroplasticity of your brain?
00:26:54.319 --> 00:26:59.759
You know, that area of research, I think, is more ongoing and evolving and a little bit tougher to determine.
00:26:59.920 --> 00:27:12.880
There have been earlier studies, much like the confusing cardiovascular literature, that sort of light drinking was associated with a reduced amount of dementia or a reduced risk of dementia, but then more recent studies have suggested perhaps there is an association.
00:27:13.039 --> 00:27:17.039
So I think it's it's not as clear as sort of the data around heart disease or cancer.
00:27:17.279 --> 00:27:18.799
And what about mental health?
00:27:18.960 --> 00:27:23.039
Because a lot of people drink to improve their mental health.
00:27:23.200 --> 00:27:29.680
I mean, it, you know, can make you feel relaxed and it can help you go to sleep.
00:27:29.839 --> 00:27:33.279
Sometimes not always stay asleep, but at least you're getting to sleep.
00:27:33.359 --> 00:27:36.319
It can help you socialize, which is good for your mental health.
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:38.160
Is there, is it a two-sided coin?
00:27:38.400 --> 00:27:43.119
Yes, alcohol and mental health is a really interesting conversation because it can be bi-directional.
00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:58.799
So people with other mental health diagnoses, so people with depression, certainly trauma, we talked about adverse childhood experiences or PTSD, people with anxiety are more likely and at greater risk of developing alcohol use disorder or problems related to alcohol use.
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:06.319
And part of that is, you know, again, that idea of seeking relief through alcohol and then the spiraling effect of the negative consequences of alcohol setting in.
00:28:06.480 --> 00:28:12.319
There's a saying that, you know, there's no problem that you can't make worse by drinking, that I haven't heard that.
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:19.359
People think that drinking may relieve sort of a worry or stress or anxiety, but often it it ends up being the exact opposite.
00:28:19.599 --> 00:28:23.359
The other thing is that you can actually get what's called a substance-induced mood disorder.
00:28:23.440 --> 00:28:27.920
So someone who's drinking really heavily, that can actually cause rebound anxiety and depression.
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:42.720
And so it's sometimes really hard to differentiate, you know, clinically, if I'm seeing someone who is meeting criteria for depression, feeling hopeless and has depressed mood, is having difficulty sleeping, low appetite, if they having heavy chaotic alcohol use, it's actually hard to know.
00:28:42.799 --> 00:28:48.559
Is this major depressive disorder that has led someone to drink heavily, or is this actually the alcohol causing the depression?
00:28:48.720 --> 00:28:55.279
And the only way to really clarify that is a period of sobriety where you can see do the mood symptoms get better or not.
00:28:55.440 --> 00:29:00.799
Sometimes if someone's had, you know, they've had depression their whole life and alcohol came later, then it's very obvious.
00:29:00.960 --> 00:29:10.160
But I think it's important to note that alcohol actually can cause anxiety and depression symptoms and make worse, you know, symptoms that people already have, even if in the moment it feels like it's giving reliefs.
00:29:10.400 --> 00:29:13.839
It's interesting that you mentioned having a break because I was gonna ask you about this.
00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:18.400
A lot of people love, you know, sober October or dry January.
00:29:18.640 --> 00:29:29.759
And I often wonder about the benefit of that, but you're saying sometimes it can provide a like a good set point, like, you know, before and after for that person.
00:29:29.920 --> 00:29:36.880
But I found, I found it interesting uh because I was thinking, well, I wonder what alcohol sales do in February.
00:29:37.759 --> 00:29:52.000
And there was a numerator report that dry January participants spend$4,000 a year on alcohol compared to everyone else spends about$1,300, which I'm like, oh my gosh, that is a big difference.
00:29:52.240 --> 00:30:01.519
So ironically, it means that the people who participate in these sober challenges are the core customer for alcohol companies.
00:30:01.680 --> 00:30:10.400
So it kind of makes me wonder for the general public, maybe not your patients who are actively striving towards that sobriety finish line.
00:30:10.559 --> 00:30:16.000
I wonder for the rest of us, for those moderate drinkers, what does that say about those sobriety challenges?
00:30:16.240 --> 00:30:17.759
Yeah, I think it's really interesting.
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:30.480
And, you know, you always worry about sort of setting up for like heavy drinking or a binge in response to this period of deprivation that people go for a month without drinking and then they're sort of off to the races and drinking even more heavily in February.
00:30:30.559 --> 00:30:31.759
And the data's a little mixed.
00:30:31.839 --> 00:30:37.359
There have been different studies country to country, but I think the the benefit of someone wants to participate is twofold.
00:30:37.440 --> 00:30:39.200
One, it's just an opportunity to be curious.
00:30:39.279 --> 00:30:50.319
So even if you don't go the whole month
without drinking, maybe you try, you know, only drinking a couple days out of the week or trying to just better understand the role alcohol plays in your life, or taking a break for a month and seeing how you feel.
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:51.920
It's sort of like keeping a food journal.
00:30:52.000 --> 00:30:59.200
Like it forces you to be more mindful of something that maybe you hadn't been sort of aware of, what were the associations between your mood and drinking?
00:30:59.359 --> 00:31:02.960
Are you drinking because you're sad, or are you drinking because you're in a social situation?
00:31:03.039 --> 00:31:06.079
It's actually pleasurable and you're building relationships with people.
00:31:06.240 --> 00:31:10.640
So I think that that opportunity for awareness actually is an intervention in and of itself.
00:31:10.799 --> 00:31:14.079
And then certainly it's kind of a litmus test to see do you feel better?
00:31:14.160 --> 00:31:24.079
So if you're wondering, like, is alcohol making me feel tired or giving me brain fog or is it interrupting my sleep, or is it causing my skin to look terrible, or am I gaining weight because of how much I drink?
00:31:24.240 --> 00:31:26.480
Or, you know, is my mood worse because I'm drinking?
00:31:26.640 --> 00:31:32.480
You know, month isn't for some of those things, you'd need to see longer than a month, but in a month, you actually can see a fair amount of change.
00:31:32.559 --> 00:31:43.359
And so sometimes that can be both helpful, kind of clarifying for someone whether alcohol is causing negative responses in their body, but also, you know, it just gives this moment of pause and reflection.
00:31:43.519 --> 00:31:55.119
And then I think the last thing is if you're worried that you may have problems related to alcohol, you know, in terms of like actually meeting criteria for alcohol use disorder, one of the criteria is trying to stop and not being able to.
00:31:55.359 --> 00:32:10.160
And so there is a little bit of a test there that if you kind of say that you want to stop and you find actually you're thinking about drinking all the time and you're not able to cut back or stop, that may be cause to be a little bit more concerned about your drinking and actually talk to a professional about it.
00:32:10.400 --> 00:32:13.599
So I think there are layers where these kind of sobriety challenges can be helpful.
00:32:13.680 --> 00:32:20.319
But I mean, for someone who is clear that alcohol, they're drinking in those lower risk drinking limits, alcohol is not causing a problem in their health.
00:32:20.400 --> 00:32:23.440
There's certainly no imperative to do a sober month challenge.
00:32:23.519 --> 00:32:37.680
And I think importantly, if you do it, just like if you sort of go through a period of healthy eating, you don't want to undo all the benefits by then, you know, doing the exact opposite, sort of eating everything in sight for a month, you're gonna erase any benefits you saw from that time of sobriety.
00:32:38.160 --> 00:32:38.400
Yes.
00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:40.319
Well, that would be very logical, Dr.
00:32:40.400 --> 00:32:41.039
Wakeman.
00:32:42.000 --> 00:32:43.839
And if only we all worked that way.
00:32:44.079 --> 00:32:46.319
Yeah, sometimes it doesn't work that way.
00:32:46.720 --> 00:33:07.039
I was doing some research on um sex addiction a while back for an episode, and I learned something really interesting that for many people, the reason that they categorize their sexual desires and their drive in the category of addiction is due to moral incongruence.
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:17.279
A lot of these folks are from strict religious communities, and so the, you know, desire to masturbate would be a sin.
00:33:17.359 --> 00:33:25.119
And so then they they still do it despite their understanding that it's a sin, and therefore, ah, it must be an addiction.
00:33:25.359 --> 00:33:32.960
And I'm wondering how much that moral incongruence dynamic plays a part in your world in in drinking.
00:33:33.279 --> 00:33:36.480
Well, I think I mean morality is is very subjective to that point.
00:33:36.559 --> 00:33:41.599
It depends on the the norms and customs of your culture, of your community.
00:33:41.759 --> 00:33:44.400
And so that that's true with alcohol too.
00:33:44.480 --> 00:33:45.759
You know, there actually can be the opposite.
00:33:45.839 --> 00:33:53.839
There can be an incongruence if your entire social setting and relationships are based around heavy alcohol use and you decide to stop drinking, that's really hard.
00:33:53.920 --> 00:33:58.160
There's an incongruence there between sort of the accepted norms in your community and what you're doing for your health.
00:33:58.319 --> 00:34:01.359
So I think anytime there are deltas there, it's challenging.
00:34:01.519 --> 00:34:13.280
I think with alcohol, unlike other stigmatized drugs, like alcohol is a drug, it is every bit as harmful, if not more, more harmful than other drugs, but it is socially accepted or more socially accepted, generally speaking, than other drugs.
00:34:13.440 --> 00:34:20.639
And so because of that, people often are not wrestling with the same moral incongruence that they would with, you know, more stigmatized type of drug.
00:34:20.880 --> 00:34:27.440
And so I think, you know, often the social norm still is that alcohol is, you know, widely available and acceptable.
00:34:27.599 --> 00:34:37.760
And so I don't think people have that same sense outside of certain religious groups or cultural groups where any alcohol uses them as a sinner is incongruent with the beliefs of their culture.
00:34:38.079 --> 00:34:58.800
How much of what we experience as a pull towards alcohol is just what I've heard people call an alcohol puppy in the brain, meaning that uh strong and repeated reinforced association between pleasure and alcohol or relief from pain and alcohol.
00:34:59.119 --> 00:35:04.159
Yeah, there are powerful neurotransmitters and pathways in
your brain that are happening when you drink.
00:35:04.320 --> 00:35:10.639
And different people have differing amounts of activation in those systems, which is part of why some people are more at risk of developing addiction than others.
00:35:10.880 --> 00:35:23.280
But generally speaking, you know, the reason we feel pleasure when we drink is sort of the end stop of pleasure for any substances, dopamine release is the brain releasing dopamine, which is a feel-good hormone that also teaches you to pay attention to something.
00:35:23.360 --> 00:35:28.320
So it's sort of signaling to the brain this concept of salience, which is the idea that you associate things.
00:35:28.400 --> 00:35:36.400
So this idea of like, oh, I drank that glass of wine and I feel relaxed and more connected to my friends, or I, you know, felt more comfortable in that first date.
00:35:36.480 --> 00:35:38.480
And so you're creating an association there.
00:35:38.639 --> 00:35:40.320
And so that can, that's normal.
00:35:40.480 --> 00:35:42.800
That happens with many, many things in your life all the time.
00:35:42.880 --> 00:35:46.400
There's your sort of brain is constantly making associations between things.
00:35:46.559 --> 00:36:08.400
But that is particularly powerful in the con in the construct of addiction, where over time the brain, that sort of salience, that idea of pay attention to alcohol, this is the thing that's going to make me feel better, becomes kind of outsized and outpaces everything else and actually outpaces sort of normal, healthy, reward-seeking behavior like relationships or food or sex or other things where there's a reason behind that salience.
00:36:08.559 --> 00:36:13.039
I think the other thing that they're showing with alcohol is it actually activates your endogenous painkiller system.
00:36:13.199 --> 00:36:19.920
So in the brain, people have probably heard of the concept of endorphins, which are endogenous opioids in your brain.
00:36:20.000 --> 00:36:23.840
So endorphin is an amalgamation of the words endogenous and morphine.
00:36:23.920 --> 00:36:25.760
So it's like your brain's morphine system.
00:36:26.000 --> 00:36:32.239
And people hear of that with like runners high or other things, this idea that your brain releases these, these pain-relieving and feel-good hormones.
00:36:32.400 --> 00:36:37.920
And for many people, alcohol actually triggers release of their endogenous opioids that estimates that system too.
00:36:38.079 --> 00:36:43.280
And so not only you're getting a dopamine release, but you're actually getting sort of a painkiller relief when you're drinking.
00:36:43.360 --> 00:36:48.480
And so that also then, of course, causes pleasure and relaxation and positive feelings.
00:36:48.559 --> 00:37:05.519
And that's the way one of the medications we use to help people either stop drinking or reduce the amount of drinking that they're doing actually blocks that opioid system so that it tries to block that reinforcement of this
sort of pleasure and reward of alcohol use has a medicine called Naltrexone that people are hearing a little bit more about than I think they used to.
00:37:05.679 --> 00:37:10.159
But it's interesting when you first hear about it, it's sort of like, well, why would an opioid blocker work for alcohol use?
00:37:10.239 --> 00:37:17.199
But it's really the blunting of that sort of reinforcing cycle of, oh, I drink and I see all these amazing feelings from drinking.
00:37:17.519 --> 00:37:23.280
So if someone is trying to just moderate their drinking, would that be a viable option for them?
00:37:23.519 --> 00:37:23.760
Yeah.
00:37:23.840 --> 00:37:26.559
And we're there's, I think, more attention to that than there used to be.
00:37:26.639 --> 00:37:29.360
So niltrexin is a medication that's been around for a long time.
00:37:29.519 --> 00:37:40.960
And in part, I think due to a lot of separation of addiction from the rest of medicine, the fact that many people, even if we talk about addiction as an illness, really think that this is an issue, sort of bad behavior.
00:37:41.039 --> 00:37:45.519
And we have lots of, I think, thoughts that people should just have willpower and sort of knock it off.
00:37:45.679 --> 00:37:54.800
And so very few people with alcohol use disorder ever get treated with medications, even though we have really effective medications that can help people either stop drinking or cut back on their drinking.
00:37:54.960 --> 00:37:59.199
But this medication, altruxone, is interesting because it can also be used just to moderate your drinking.
00:37:59.360 --> 00:38:09.760
And so there's a thing called the Sinclair method, which is named after a scientist by the name of Sinclair who studied it, which is the idea of actually pre-medicating before an event where you're tempted to drink more.
00:38:09.920 --> 00:38:20.400
So if you know that whenever you go to happy hour, you walk in intending to drink one or two and you leave having drunk five or six, and you just like once you start drinking, it's really hard to stop.
00:38:20.559 --> 00:38:24.880
What Sinclair studied is actually taking this medicine before you're in a situation like that.
00:38:25.039 --> 00:38:28.159
And what happens is you drink, but you just don't get the same pleasurable effect.
00:38:28.320 --> 00:38:33.280
And so it's not like you get sick, but people, you know, patients will describe to me this sense of like, oh, I had a glass of wine.
00:38:33.440 --> 00:38:35.760
I just like didn't have that urge to want another.
00:38:35.840 --> 00:38:36.719
It didn't feel that good.
00:38:36.800 --> 00:38:42.400
And so that can help reinforce people's if they have an intention of trying to cut back or not drink in a heavy manner.
00:38:42.719 --> 00:38:50.559
So is that something that the average person could just talk to their regular doctor about without fear?
00:38:50.719 --> 00:38:57.440
Because, you know, there is a lot of stigma around drinking and as you said,
like willpower and all of that.
00:38:57.599 --> 00:39:11.760
So if someone is just trying to stay in the moderate zone and they're finding that it's difficult, but they're just not ready to do the cold turkey thing, do you realistically do you think that they could just say, hey, doc, I heard that there is a medicine that helps me do that?
00:39:11.920 --> 00:39:22.480
Or would that like, you know, trigger some sort of cascade of responses from that person's medical team that would be, you know, undesired?
00:39:22.719 --> 00:39:26.559
So in a perfect world, absolutely you can and should say that to your primary care doctor.
00:39:26.719 --> 00:39:29.039
You know, any doctor can prescribe that medicine.
00:39:29.119 --> 00:39:32.159
You don't need like special training or a special license or anything like that.
00:39:32.320 --> 00:39:37.039
And primary care doctors are often sort of the trusted healthcare professional that people know over time.
00:39:37.199 --> 00:39:46.000
And there have been lots of studies that patients actually feel most comfortable talking to their PCPs as opposed to some random other person or specialist about their alcohol use.
00:39:46.159 --> 00:39:51.280
And so I think absolutely you could say to your primary care doctor, you know, I'm realizing I'm drinking more than my goal.
00:39:51.440 --> 00:39:53.360
You know, I've heard about these lower drinking limits.
00:39:53.440 --> 00:39:56.159
I want to try to keep it to one drink a day or two drinks a day.
00:39:56.239 --> 00:40:00.320
And I find in certain settings, you know, I'm I I tend to drink more than that.
00:40:00.400 --> 00:40:04.079
And I've heard there's this medicine that can help people cut back and I want to try it.
00:40:04.159 --> 00:40:05.760
And they should be able to prescribe that.
00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:14.639
There actually are now these companies, online companies that are doing sort of direct-to-consumer consultations, kind of similar to the whole industry with GLP ones around weight loss.
00:40:14.800 --> 00:40:21.360
And I think that so that can be an option too for people if they either don't have a primary care doctor or feel like they're not able to talk to that person.
00:40:21.519 --> 00:40:30.960
To me, it's sort of a sad testament of medicine that we've so failed to address substance use as a part of health, that there have to be these like pop-off valves that are separate for people to find care.
00:40:31.119 --> 00:40:50.079
And I actually think that talking to your doctor is an important part of changing the system and normalizing this, that that's part of how doctors change their practice, actually, especially when we've been in practice a long time, is they realize they have to get with their times that their patients need help with different things and there are treatments that they can learn how to prescribe them and how to offer them and make them a part of their practice.
00:40:50.320 --> 00:41:05.280
Well, I find it interesting that you were talking about the intersection of behavior and medicine and what we consider disease, because in my non-medical brain, those things are always connected and always linked arms with one another.
00:41:05.519 --> 00:41:15.679
And so if a medicine could help a behavior which equals a better health outcome, then that feels like an obvious choice.
00:41:15.840 --> 00:41:33.199
I I think where I have trouble is the all or nothings of alcohol in our society, where people are saying it's 100% a disease, I inherited it, and it is always if someone has the same problem I do, it is 100% a disease.
00:41:33.440 --> 00:41:40.239
And or it's a hundred percent behavior, and you just need to buck up and you know make that change.
00:41:40.400 --> 00:41:44.079
And I don't know, that black or white part is is tough for me.
00:41:44.159 --> 00:41:47.599
I I found this study actually, I think that you would find interesting.
00:41:47.760 --> 00:41:49.280
It's it was an experiment, actually.
00:41:49.360 --> 00:41:52.400
It was South Dakota's 24-7 sobriety program.
00:41:52.639 --> 00:41:54.320
You probably already have you heard of this.
00:41:54.559 --> 00:41:54.880
Interesting.
00:41:54.960 --> 00:41:55.760
I haven't heard of it now.
00:41:55.840 --> 00:41:56.320
Oh my gosh.
00:41:56.400 --> 00:41:57.599
Okay, this is kind of cool.
00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:03.039
I I would love to see our town experiment with this, but I don't know how all that stuff works.
00:42:03.199 --> 00:42:07.119
But the participants were required to take twice daily breathalyzer tests.
00:42:07.519 --> 00:42:09.679
The participants were people who got DUIs.
00:42:09.920 --> 00:42:10.079
Okay.
00:42:10.400 --> 00:42:12.719
So they had to take a breathalyzer test twice a day.
00:42:12.880 --> 00:42:19.760
And if they failed or skipped even just one test, they went straight to jail, like and stayed there overnight.
00:42:19.920 --> 00:42:21.920
And it was very swift.
00:42:22.159 --> 00:42:27.599
So they did this from 2005 to early 2017 with over 30,000 people.
00:42:28.159 --> 00:42:52.320
And they accumulated over 5 million days without a detected alcohol violation, over almost a million breathalyzer tests recorded, 99.4% passed, which is really cool because like there was a strong and swift incentive because earlier you were talking about how strong that association becomes.
00:42:52.400 --> 00:42:57.519
Like it starts out as an alcohol puppy and it grows into a mastiff.
00:42:58.400 --> 00:43:04.480
You know, those little paws, they grow into a big old animal and you can't, it's like you've lost control.
00:43:04.639 --> 00:43:07.519
You didn't realize this is what it was going to snowball into.
00:43:07.760 --> 00:43:14.800
And so it was interesting to me that this experiment had a had a big consequence to kind of counter that.
00:43:14.960 --> 00:43:21.360
And it led to a 12% reduction in DUI arrests and 9% reduction in domestic violence arrests.
00:43:21.599 -->
00:43:25.519
So overall, it reduced the risk of death by 50%.
00:43:26.239 --> 00:43:34.480
And I thought that was so cool, but it it definitely pushes back a little bit on the alcoholism is 100% a disease narrative.
00:43:34.559 --> 00:43:49.840
And I'm wondering if it might be better for everyone if we could find some sort of compassionate middle ground where we don't need to be overly attached to labels and instead, as you were doing, taking a more personalized approach and like, okay, well, what what can I do?
00:43:50.000 --> 00:43:50.639
What can be done?
00:43:50.719 --> 00:43:54.320
But but from a systemic point of view, I thought that was fascinating.
00:43:54.639 --> 00:44:05.599
Yeah, well, I think, I mean, there's so many layers then to what you just shared, but I I think first the idea that Like most chronic health conditions, addiction is a mix of sort of behavior and biology.
00:44:05.679 --> 00:44:07.360
And that's true for diabetes.
00:44:07.440 --> 00:44:08.480
That's true for heart disease.
00:44:08.559 --> 00:44:09.599
That's true for cancer.
00:44:09.760 --> 00:44:15.199
That's true for addiction, where there's some element of your individual risk that you're, you know, inherit.
00:44:15.280 --> 00:44:19.039
And that can be like roughly half or or so of the picture.
00:44:19.280 --> 00:44:26.880
And then there's like what you're exposed to, the circumstances that you're in, your health-related behaviors, what age you start drinking, how often you're drinking.
00:44:27.039 --> 00:44:31.280
And so there's always this intercepting interplay between behavior and biology.
00:44:31.360 --> 00:44:34.800
And, you know, same thing with diabetes, where someone, you know, is born.
00:44:34.960 --> 00:44:38.719
If everyone in your family has diabetes, you're going to be at greater risk, but that's not a done deal.
00:44:38.800 --> 00:44:41.599
There's many things you can do to prevent diabetes from occurring.
00:44:41.679 --> 00:44:42.400
And same thing.
00:44:42.480 --> 00:44:45.199
Some people have no family history and, you know, develop diabetes.
00:44:45.280 --> 00:44:48.480
And so I think there are very few things that are totally binary.
00:44:48.559 --> 00:44:55.039
And certainly in the realm of substance use, most things are an overlapping mix of behavior and biology.
00:44:55.199 --> 00:44:57.840
And again, that aligns with other chronic illnesses.
00:44:58.079 --> 00:45:08.000
You know, the DUI literature is interesting because mixed in that group is probably a whole hodgepodge of people who actually have addiction and people who are just drinking at a heavy level.
00:45:08.239 --> 00:45:18.239
And so again, if we think of that as a spectrum, it's not sort of this all or nothing of either you are, you know, have alcohol use disorder or alcoholism, or you have no problems with alcohol.
00:45:18.320 --> 00:45:24.719
It's there's a whole spectrum in there that we've been exploring and beyond that of drinking in ways that are really beginning to cause problems in your life.
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:33.199
And many people with their first DUI, they may not yet actually have the kind of compulsive loss of control characteristics that we see with alcohol use disorder.
00:45:33.280 --> 00:45:38.800
And so that's a time when there is more choice involved in terms of sort of decision change.
00:45:38.960 --> 00:45:41.599
So you're you've got like a mixed population there.
00:45:41.760 --> 00:45:53.920
But I think the other two things that I'm struck by what you say, one is, you know, I always say to our fellows who I'm I'm teaching or our teams that it really doesn't matter why we as professionals think someone should make changes to their alcohol use.
00:45:54.000 --> 00:45:58.400
Like the only thing that matters is that they think their life is going to change in a positive way if they do.
00:45:58.639 --> 00:46:16.159
And so in that context, if you don't want to lose your license or you don't want to go to jail or whatever it is that you're facing in your unique circumstances, like that is a very salient motivator of making change, especially if you're drinking in a way that's unhealthy and don't necessarily have this sort of compulsive loss of control that we see with addiction.
00:46:16.320 --> 00:46:28.320
You know, the flip side of that coin is the very severe end of the spectrum of people with severe addiction, you know, sometimes even facing terrible negative consequences like jail or losing their kids or losing their job, people just are not able to make changes.
00:46:28.480 --> 00:46:31.440
So there is, you know, shades of severity in there.
00:46:31.679 --> 00:46:44.000
And then the last thing is that one of the most sort of effective interventions from a behavioral standpoint for all types of addiction is something called contingency management, which is actually positive incentives for behavior change.
00:46:44.159 --> 00:46:54.400
So this would be things like if someone has a negative drug test or if they engage in treatment or show up to see their therapist or their doctor, they actually get positive incentives or rewards.
00:46:54.480 --> 00:47:00.559
So sometimes these are like vouchers that support a healthy lifestyle or other entering a raffle to win something.
00:47:00.800 --> 00:47:04.159
And it can sound kind of weird at first of like, well, why would that work?
00:47:04.239 --> 00:47:06.800
But actually, we do this across lots of different areas of health.
00:47:06.880 --> 00:47:22.239
So if you have a health insurance plan where you get money back if you join the gym or go to the gym a certain number of days of the year, or you get sort of a rebate for any pro-healthy behavior, that in essence is positive contingency management, trying to change people's behavior with positive rewards.
00:47:22.400 --> 00:47:31.840
And some of the concept of why that works with addiction is that when someone gets to the degree of having addiction, often they have a
lot of things that have fallen apart in their life.
00:47:32.000 --> 00:47:36.159
They may have lost relationships with family, they may have lost their work or their housing.
00:47:36.320 --> 00:47:38.719
And that stuff takes years to rebuild sometimes.
00:47:38.880 --> 00:47:43.280
And alcohol is a very powerful source of relief as we've covered.
00:47:43.360 --> 00:47:49.920
It's something that gives you immediate escape from the challenges of daily life or your pain or your suffering or withdrawal.
00:47:50.079 --> 00:48:00.400
And so you're essentially asking someone to discount the sort of immediate reward of drinking for these very abstract long-term rewards of like, well, if you just stay sober for two years, maybe you'll get your housing back.
00:48:00.639 --> 00:48:01.679
And that's really hard.
00:48:01.760 --> 00:48:08.079
You know, you're sort of saying no to this thing that can immediately make you feel better for this concept that maybe things will get better down the road.
00:48:08.239 --> 00:48:18.079
And so part of contingency management is actually giving people a positive, immediate good thing for doing the sort of healthy behavior that that is a part of supporting their recovery, like not drinking.
00:48:18.159 --> 00:48:23.039
And so, so there certainly are ways in which sort of behavioral interventions like that can be helpful.
00:48:24.079 --> 00:48:27.199
You said something interesting in another interview.
00:48:27.440 --> 00:48:33.360
You said the opposite of alcoholism isn't sobriety, it's connection.
00:48:33.599 --> 00:48:36.079
As we close, can you unpack that?
00:48:36.480 --> 00:48:40.719
Yeah, you know, I think we we focus so much on sort of is someone sober or not?
00:48:40.880 --> 00:48:43.360
What is their drug test show or their alcohol test show?
00:48:43.519 --> 00:48:45.679
Really, addiction is a disease of isolation.
00:48:45.920 --> 00:48:54.000
People often are isolated from relationships, from connection with people that bring hope and meaning and purpose to their lives.
00:48:54.239 --> 00:49:04.239
And as powerful as an incentive as negative things happening to you can be, you know, the idea that you want to escape the pain of ongoing alcohol use disorder.
00:49:04.719 --> 00:49:10.480
Actually, one of the biggest incentives is a sense of hope that your life could look better, that people care about you and believe in you.
00:49:10.719 --> 00:49:17.760
And those connections are a powerful vehicle for getting there, but are also sort of the reward that comes along with that journey of recovery.
00:49:17.840 --> 00:49:31.760
And so whether you find that through support groups or through engaging with a doctor or a nurse or a therapist, you know, that connection is often the thread that is so powerful in helping people get to a place where they they think their life could be better if they were to make changes to alcohol.
00:49:32.000 --> 00:49:32.159
Yeah.
00:49:32.320 --> 00:49:38.639
And I think that it's neat what you're doing to help kind of facilitate that that connection.
00:49:38.800 --> 00:49:46.800
You know, the very you seem very hands-on, personable with your patients and with your approach at educating the public.
00:49:46.960 --> 00:49:49.760
So I appreciate you taking time to do that with us.
00:49:50.000 --> 00:49:58.480
Can you can you tell people where they can find your book and any sources of ongoing research or educational material that you have?
00:49:58.800 --> 00:49:59.039
Yeah.
00:49:59.119 --> 00:50:01.679
Well, first, thank you so much for saying that and for having me.
00:50:01.840 --> 00:50:05.440
So my book is called Treatable, and it is coming out January 5th.
00:50:05.519 --> 00:50:09.039
And you can pre-order it now on my website, drsarahwakeman.com.
00:50:09.199 --> 00:50:13.039
You can contact me through my website or follow me on Instagram, also Dr.
00:50:13.119 --> 00:50:20.880
Sarah Wakeman or on LinkedIn, and I would be excited to connect and really hope people enjoy the book and can hear more about these topics there.
00:50:21.199 --> 00:50:22.239
Well, thank you again.
00:50:22.400 --> 00:50:23.199
This was great.
00:50:23.519 --> 00:50:25.039
Thank you so much, Meredith.
00:50:25.840 --> 00:50:26.719
Thanks for listening.
00:50:26.880 --> 00:50:30.960
Since you've made it this far, I'd like to invite you to be part of my private Facebook group.
00:50:31.119 --> 00:50:33.840
And there I post content that I don't share anywhere else.
00:50:33.920 --> 00:50:37.119
You can talk to me directly, and I even do occasional giveaways.
00:50:37.280 --> 00:50:41.360
Search MFR Curious Insiders on Facebook or click the link in the show notes.
00:50:41.519 --> 00:50:49.199
If you liked this episode, you'll also like the one with the sober scientist who answers the question how do you know if you're an alcoholic?
00:50:49.360 --> 00:50:51.440
That's episode 265.
00:50:51.599 --> 00:50:57.519
And stay tuned next week for a remastered favorite asking if political parties are just cults.
00:50:57.679 --> 00:50:59.599
Until then, keep it curious.