TRANSCRIPT 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.090 --> 00:00:03.089
Now, here's your Care for My Wealth guide, Chris Klein.
2
00:00:05.509 --> 00:00:07.690
Good morning and welcome to the Care for My Wealth show.
3
00:00:07.809 --> 00:00:11.289
I am your host, Chris Klein. It is, what is today?
4
00:00:11.410 --> 00:00:18.820
Holy smokes, Thursday, November the 5th, 2026. Boy, you know,
5
00:00:18.839 --> 00:00:21.420
there's always so much going on in any given day.
6
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:26.519
So far this morning, futures are just not doing anything crazy.
7
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:29.920
But my question right now is, is the consumer really dead?
8
00:00:30.910 --> 00:00:33.850
You know, if you were to pay attention to only
9
00:00:33.890 --> 00:00:36.450
the consumer confidence data that comes out each month, you
10
00:00:36.479 --> 00:00:39.560
might think the average consumer is just dead broke and
11
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:42.479
not spending. But you might think differently if you were
12
00:00:42.500 --> 00:00:45.240
to look at a basket of companies that reflect where
13
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:49.840
and how people are actually spending money. The consumer confidence
14
00:00:49.880 --> 00:00:54.619
data tells us that there are persistent worries about purchasing power, inflation, affordability,
15
00:00:54.950 --> 00:00:59.600
keeping the consumer under pressure, lack of confidence, right? Considering
16
00:00:59.619 --> 00:01:03.259
how inflation's been, it's pretty easy to see how people
17
00:01:03.340 --> 00:01:07.060
feel that way. According to the University of Michigan Consumer
18
00:01:07.079 --> 00:01:10.469
Sentiment Survey, sentiment is down about 10% from a year ago,
19
00:01:10.549 --> 00:01:13.650
about 15% below the February levels, which of course marked
20
00:01:13.670 --> 00:01:18.090
the whole Iran stupidity. But what are the companies that
21
00:01:19.090 --> 00:01:22.430
actually benefit from real consumer spending doing? I mean, if
22
00:01:22.450 --> 00:01:25.329
you look at a real life basket of companies, Like,
23
00:01:25.379 --> 00:01:30.400
for example, Apple, Walmart, Costco, Target, Disney, Visa, MasterCard, American Express,
24
00:01:30.819 --> 00:01:35.480
United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Uber, Simon Property Group. I mean,
25
00:01:35.500 --> 00:01:37.579
that's a pretty good basket. If you did that, you'd
26
00:01:37.620 --> 00:01:40.099
see that the consumer might be doing better than the
27
00:01:40.140 --> 00:01:44.269
data suggests. Look, that's a homemade index. Bigger companies still
28
00:01:44.310 --> 00:01:46.709
get bigger wage, just like the official index. But in
29
00:01:46.769 --> 00:01:51.409
this index, you've got tech, financials, industrials, communications, and real estate.
30
00:01:51.989 --> 00:01:55.810
Pretty much like real life. Right now, that particular dashboard
31
00:01:55.849 --> 00:01:59.359
looks a lot healthier than the official consumer index does. Now,
32
00:01:59.420 --> 00:02:03.060
that doesn't
Load full transcript
mean every family is doing great. In fact,
33
00:02:03.859 --> 00:02:06.680
the opposite is very real. I mean, clearly we know
34
00:02:07.280 --> 00:02:09.819
that not every family is doing awesome. But when we
35
00:02:09.860 --> 00:02:12.620
include more of the businesses where families actually spend money,
36
00:02:13.120 --> 00:02:15.030
the picture gets a little bit more clear for us
37
00:02:15.110 --> 00:02:18.849
to make a decision on whether or not the consumer
38
00:02:19.270 --> 00:02:23.110
is consuming or falling apart. And right now, it doesn't
39
00:02:23.129 --> 00:02:27.469
look like they're necessarily falling apart. How about high yield?
40
00:02:27.530 --> 00:02:29.939
You know what? High yield bonds are always a good
41
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:33.699
place to take a peek as to what's going on.
42
00:02:34.020 --> 00:02:36.819
High yield bonds often tell a story about where equities
43
00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:40.780
might be headed as their particular values tend to be
44
00:02:40.819 --> 00:02:44.169
more closely tied to equities earnings than they are yields
45
00:02:44.250 --> 00:02:47.729
like traditional bonds. And we can see how high yield
46
00:02:48.129 --> 00:02:51.210
is doing by looking at the advanced decline data for
47
00:02:51.250 --> 00:02:55.180
high yield bond investments versus simple moving averages and currently
48
00:02:55.419 --> 00:02:58.240
what the S & P 500 index is doing. And
49
00:02:58.259 --> 00:03:01.180
so what is that saying? Well, it's just telling us
50
00:03:01.219 --> 00:03:03.800
that high yield still stinks. It's down about 4% so
51
00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:08.330
far this year. And that's frankly unfortunate for the stock
52
00:03:08.370 --> 00:03:12.110
market buy and hold bulls since those two items, high
53
00:03:12.150 --> 00:03:16.009
yield advanced decline and the stock market index, the S
54
00:03:16.009 --> 00:03:17.969
& P 500, well, they tend to move in the
55
00:03:18.009 --> 00:03:21.900
same direction with high yield leading. Now, if that relationship
56
00:03:21.939 --> 00:03:25.650
remains true, yesterday might not have been the bottom for U.S.
57
00:03:25.719 --> 00:03:29.430
equity markets, especially for tech. Words of the day for investors,
58
00:03:29.889 --> 00:03:32.930
be nimble and have a process. If those two things
59
00:03:32.969 --> 00:03:35.729
don't exist, you might want to rethink your buy and
60
00:03:35.789 --> 00:03:40.500
hold strategy when it relates to markets in general. So
61
00:03:40.539 --> 00:03:42.680
let's think about the strength of markets in general. Let's
62
00:03:42.699 --> 00:03:45.620
look at trend strength. Within the S & P 500,
63
00:03:45.620 --> 00:03:48.439
or excuse me, indexes, which would include the S &
64
00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:53.949
P 400 indexes, 500 and 600, just basically looking at
65
00:03:53.990 --> 00:03:57.180
large cap, mid cap, small cap, the percentage of stocks
66
00:03:57.319 --> 00:04:01.599
with 50-day moving averages above their 200-day averages has begun
67
00:04:01.659 --> 00:04:05.819
to recede pretty meaningfully. Now, this is reversing the gains
68
00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:08.819
that we saw earlier this year, and that's pointing to
69
00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:13.120
some underlying weaknesses. The mid cap indexes are signaling the
70
00:04:13.159 --> 00:04:18.250
weaker of the three cap weightings, and that's interesting. often
71
00:04:18.310 --> 00:04:22.569
because the mid-cap weightings can, in many cases, do better
72
00:04:22.850 --> 00:04:25.670
than the other cap weightings. Small caps, of course, are
73
00:04:25.730 --> 00:04:28.860
subject to all sorts of problems with high interest rates
74
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:31.620
because they don't have the same cash flows that mid
75
00:04:31.660 --> 00:04:34.839
and large caps do. Large caps can't grow their earnings
76
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:38.160
as rapidly as small caps. So volatility, of course, is
77
00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:40.540
different between the two. And mid-caps, they sit right in
78
00:04:40.560 --> 00:04:43.899
the middle. And so oftentimes we see mid-cap stuff really
79
00:04:43.939 --> 00:04:47.480
do okay. Well, So far, the signals we're getting out
80
00:04:47.540 --> 00:04:50.370
of mid caps are the weaker of the three. Now,
81
00:04:50.389 --> 00:04:53.889
does this mean that markets are just ready to crash? No,
82
00:04:54.089 --> 00:04:58.149
not necessarily. But underlying weakness in individual constituents versus the
83
00:04:58.209 --> 00:05:01.290
index is clearly not ideal. That's not what we would
84
00:05:01.329 --> 00:05:06.540
like to see. Interestingly, the safe stocks have become expensive.
85
00:05:06.579 --> 00:05:09.060
And when I say safe, I mean those that make
86
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:12.620
up the S & P 500 low volatility group. You
87
00:05:12.639 --> 00:05:16.399
can look at that via SPLV as an example. a
88
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:19.959
lot of these stocks have become expensive, while growth and
89
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.939
momentum names have become relatively cheap. Additionally, the S &
90
00:05:23.899 --> 00:05:29.120
P 500 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio is at levels not seen, well,
91
00:05:29.139 --> 00:05:33.019
for several years. And this might point towards rotation within
92
00:05:33.050 --> 00:05:37.230
the index more than anything else. Rotation away from tech
93
00:05:37.290 --> 00:05:42.089
still seems pretty relevant, and while at the same time
94
00:05:42.230 --> 00:05:46.670
we're seeing rotation toward more value names like Staples in healthcare.
95
00:05:47.670 --> 00:05:50.829
The value style factor is clearly stronger than the growth
96
00:05:50.870 --> 00:05:54.040
style factor. And all you have to do is compare IWD,
97
00:05:54.100 --> 00:05:57.199
which is the value fund, versus IWF, which is the
98
00:05:57.259 --> 00:06:00.959
growth fund. If you go to our website, careformywealth.com, hover
99
00:06:01.259 -->
00:06:05.319
over listen and read, click on CWM's daily briefing, there's
100
00:06:05.339 --> 00:06:08.310
a chart on the very bottom of the page that
101
00:06:08.370 --> 00:06:13.389
shows that comparison. And when you compare IWD versus IWF,
102
00:06:15.370 --> 00:06:17.810
what you want to see is, well, which direction is
103
00:06:17.860 --> 00:06:22.459
the line moving? If you're comparing that ratio, IWD to IWF,
104
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:24.600
and the line is moving up, it's telling us that
105
00:06:24.639 --> 00:06:27.180
value is beating growth. And if you just look at
106
00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:31.250
individual charts of IWD versus IWF, you'd see very clearly
107
00:06:31.550 --> 00:06:34.930
that's true. It's also important to note that there are
108
00:06:34.970 --> 00:06:38.050
some pretty big names that take up space in both
109
00:06:38.089 --> 00:06:41.839
of those style factors. Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, for example, are
110
00:06:41.879 --> 00:06:44.490
a few. And again, this just points more towards internal
111
00:06:44.529 --> 00:06:48.930
market rotation than anything. NVIDIA and all the semiconductors and Google, well,
112
00:06:48.949 --> 00:06:51.470
they're lagging, to say the least, kind of getting hammered,
113
00:06:52.069 --> 00:06:55.009
along with the entire AI infra trade that's been going on.
114
00:06:55.629 --> 00:06:58.649
While those other three, at least to this point, have
115
00:06:58.709 --> 00:07:04.230
picked up. Amazon has recovered from their earnings bashing. Same
116
00:07:04.290 --> 00:07:07.410
is true with Apple. Microsoft seems to be hanging in
117
00:07:07.449 --> 00:07:11.180
there so far. So until that changes, we just have
118
00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:13.379
to look at what the data is saying. And the
119
00:07:13.430 --> 00:07:16.410
data is saying value is better than growth. We've got
120
00:07:16.449 --> 00:07:20.970
some problems with underlying constituents versus the index. And if
121
00:07:21.029 --> 00:07:25.370
weakness in individual constituents by way of how they're trading
122
00:07:25.569 --> 00:07:29.430
in terms of their 50-day and 200-day averages, if that
123
00:07:29.470 --> 00:07:32.879
continues to weaken, then eventually we could see the indexes
124
00:07:32.959 --> 00:07:35.339
catch up. Same is true for high yield. If we
125
00:07:35.379 --> 00:07:40.370
compare HYG to SPY, you can see that there's a diversion.
126
00:07:40.790 --> 00:07:44.509
And if the stock index tends to catch up to
127
00:07:44.550 --> 00:07:48.759
high yield, well, then that tells us that we probably
128
00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:53.079
haven't seen a bottom yet. And time will tell. We'll
129
00:07:53.100 --> 00:07:54.800
just have to kind of let it play out as
130
00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.540
we always do and then move on from there. All right,
131
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:00.180
that's it for today. I hope you have an amazing, wonderful,
132
00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:01.899
beautiful day. You know how to reach us. If you'd
133
00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:04.199
like to, feel free and do so. And we will
134
00:08:04.259 --> 00:08:07.750
see you on the other side. Until then, always remember,
135
00:08:08.120 --> 00:08:08.689
Jesus loves you.