TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:05
Speaker 1: Appoja production.
00:00:10
Speaker 2: This is episode four of poison the podcast that delves into the allegations that a social media influencer in Australia drugged a child to illstit social media followers and cash. This matter is currently before the court and we're limited in what we can say about the specific case, but it's brought up some issues that we're exploring. Generally, the discussion that follows is not related to that case. The accused mother in the matter is entitled to a fair trial and we want to make sure.
00:00:38
Speaker 1: That's allowed to occur.
00:00:44
Speaker 2: Each episode, I'm joined by Micky Fisher, who's a content creator, a Reykid practitioner and a mum. If you have information you want to share with us, you can email us anonymously at podcast Poisoned at gmail dot com. Before we speak to an expert in criminal psychology, we wanted to cover some of the huge profile cases where the defense of Munchausen's by proxy have been used.
00:01:06
Speaker 3: Well, the first time I ever heard about it, I think, was to do with the gypsy Rose Blanchard case, and that was the first time I'd sort of been aware that such a thing really existed, and all I know about more chausends making up like a medical disorder and then by proxy it's to do it to somebody else.
00:01:25
Speaker 2: We're talking about Gypsy Rose is probably one of the more high profile cases. And she was American, right.
00:01:30
Speaker 3: Yes, I followed it quite deeply, like like when I first told Yeah, when I first heard about the story, I was so interested and intrigued and shocked to shit about like how such a thing could happen and occur and how people could get away with something like that for such a long time. Re researching it recently, given you know this type of case that we're investigating, it is fascinating.
00:01:57
Speaker 2: So maybe for those people that don't know the story of Gypsy Rose and her mum, d D. Blanchard, do you want to just give us an view of what happened?
00:02:06
Speaker 1: Okay? So the general story is that DEDE.
00:02:08
Speaker 3: Blanchard was found stabbed to death in her Missouri home on the fourteenth of June twenty fifteen, after friends and family alerted authorities after seeing a Facebook post that was posted by Gypsy on her and a mum's shared ACCOUMP that said that.
00:02:23
Speaker 1: Bitch is dead.
00:02:25
Speaker 2: Oh wow.
00:02:25
Speaker 3: Obviously red flags started to go off. DEDI had been stabbed to death by Nicholas, who was Gypsy's.
00:02:34
Speaker 1: Boyfriend at the time.
00:02:35
Speaker 3: So he's currently still in prison serving his time for first degree murder. But let's backtrack to the mum and sort of what led to the stabbing and kind of like how this all occurred and the why and everything. That's what's so interesting because it ended up being a murder and the woman who had the more chosen by proxy and was essentially abusing her daughter ended up becoming a victim of murder.
00:03:03
Speaker 1: And then so that's where it sort of back and forth.
00:03:05
Speaker 3: But according to Rod Blanchard, who is Gypsy's father, when Gypsy was three months old did he had become convinced that Gypsy had sleep apnea and had begun taking her to the hospital. It was found that she had no sign of the condition, but it just continued. Diddy was just like convinced that Gypsy had like a range of health issues, which she attributed to an unspecified chromosomal disorder, and she even claimed that Gypsy had muscular dystrophy and made her use a walker. Her parents would like take her to the special Olympics events, and Dede would tell people that Gypsy was younger than she was, like an accept sage. She was ten years old, but she'd be telling people, oh no, she's only eight, and generally claimed that Gypsy was disab well, that was the whole thing. Gypsy's you know, she's got this, that and the other thing, the medical disorders, like just sort of went on and on and on, and then eventually ended up in a wheelchair. In two thousand and five, they moved because of the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, and that's where they were living at the time, and so Dedi claimed that because of the hurricane, all of Gypsy's medical records were flooded, they were lost, and so they moved to Missouri. By this stage, she was claiming that Gypsy had been diagnosed with multiple conditions, including leukemia and again the muscular dystrophee and in two thousand and eight, a couple of years later, they were gifted a pink house that was built by an organization called Habitat for Humanity. The house included accessibility features like the wheelchair ramp, the oxygen tank, and feeding tube. But Gypsy and DD received a lot of support again from the community organizations like Make a Wish, celebrities, They were donating massive amounts of money, they were going on charity chip trips like Disney World and all of.
00:05:03
Speaker 2: These things, because like they are amazing organizations that help people that actually need really and they are going, well, Gypsy Rose is really ill, san let's.
00:05:15
Speaker 3: Help, and the normal person is never going, what if they're making it up? You're seeing sick kids every day, you're involved in it, or like you know, you're just a general person and you're hearing this horrible, awful story and you just want to be able to do anything to help these people and help this child. But between two thousand and seven and two thousand and nine is when some red flags started to sort of appear, so doctor started having doubts. Gypsy's former neurologists reportedly found no evidence of her conditions, and that was in two thousand and seven.
00:05:50
Speaker 1: He even wrote a letter to Gypsy's.
00:05:52
Speaker 3: Primary doctor stating that he believed that the mother suffers from more Chausen's by proxy.
00:05:58
Speaker 1: So that was in two thousand and seven that he mentioned that.
00:06:01
Speaker 3: Two years
Load full transcript
later, another doctor called authorities when he couldn't any symptoms that supported what Ded alleged to be wrong with her daughter, and medical records show that Dede and Gypsy visited over one hundred and fifty medical professionals over the year. So the way that they kind of got away with this in a way is one you know, say, like the flood where they apparently lost or medical records. Dede would also slightly change Gypsy's name. She would change the spelling, adjust it slightly, so it was always kind of different, and they would just jump from.
00:06:33
Speaker 1: Doctor to doctor, to doctor to doctor to doctor.
00:06:36
Speaker 3: Twenty eleven, Gypsy attempted to run away to be with a man that she met at a convention, but when Dede caught her, and this is according to Gypsy. Gypsy's written a book She's mentioned all of this, Dede destroyed her phone and laptop and changed her to a bed and placed bells on the doors so she couldn't leave. In October twenty twelve, that's when Nicholas and Gypsy began chatting via a Christian dating app and they were like very much in love. Through all of this, gyps he was still forced to go to appointments and everything else.
00:07:09
Speaker 2: So Mom's still saying she's really sick. Oh yeah, and Gypsy Rose is starting to get romantically involved with Nicholas, who will end up being the killer of her mum.
00:07:19
Speaker 3: Yes, I think like Gypsy was starting to become aware of it all and recognizing.
00:07:25
Speaker 1: It as abuse. But of course, what when you're in an.
00:07:29
Speaker 3: Abusive situation like that, There's not really much that you can do. If she's like, you know, chaining her daughter to the bed and things like that, you know, there's only so much that you can do.
00:07:40
Speaker 1: And so this brings us to the murder.
00:07:43
Speaker 4: Right.
00:07:43
Speaker 3: Gypsy gave Nicholas the boyfriend gloves, a knife, duct tape, and she hid in the bathroom while he stabbed d d seventeen times and again. This is in twenty fifteen, and Nicholas and Gypsy then fled the scene. They apparently had sex in the same room and then.
00:08:03
Speaker 1: Off they went.
00:08:04
Speaker 3: The day after the body was found, police were able to sort of track where Gypsy and her boyfriend were. They were I think his place, and he surrendered himself to the police. Police also found that Gypsy was with him, unharmed and wheelchair less, completely able to walk, which apparently, you know, she was supposed to not be able to walk and was bound to a wheelchair.
00:08:28
Speaker 2: As a miracle. Second degree murder for Gypsy Rose means that she would be eligible for parole. First degree murder on his count meant no parole, so it was first degree with no chance of parole. So he will stay in jail forever unless someone pardons him. So she obviously got out in December of twenty twenty three, and she'd served eight years of a ten year sentence. The moment she got out, she did interviews with every single
media outlet in the States.
00:08:54
Speaker 5: Gypsy Rose Blanchard, who helped kill her mother to escape a life of suffering and abuse, has been the subject of countless media stories at a Hollywood series, Well, now she's a free woman and she's telling her own story.
00:09:09
Speaker 6: I share my story to be a cautionary tale so that the next person that might be in a situation like mine, they don't take the route that I did.
00:09:22
Speaker 2: She's now got like almost eight million followers on Instagram, ten million follows on TikTok. She appeared on the fifth seasons of The Kardashians on Hulu.
00:09:32
Speaker 4: Hi, Gypsy Hill, I've been following your case for a really long time, really, so like I wouldn't want to come and you know, really meet with someone that I feel like can make an impact, just for like the sensation of the case, right, I.
00:09:49
Speaker 2: Mean, she's got a movie about her, the Movies called The Act if you've not seen it on Hulu.
00:09:54
Speaker 1: She's become famous, a celebrity.
00:09:56
Speaker 2: A celebrity of So that's right, No doubt suffered shocking abuse at the hands of someone that was supposed to look after.
00:10:04
Speaker 7: Yeah.
00:10:04
Speaker 2: Yeah, but you still go that sort of glorification if you like, of a moment in her life she comes out, she becomes famous. Yeah, yeah, yeah, you think about the timing. You could imagine that someone sees something like this and goes, oh, that's interesting.
00:10:20
Speaker 3: The obsessional, like what we you know, begin to learn around muchausends is it's just this need for attention or this like obsession with attention.
00:10:34
Speaker 2: There's a lot of celebrities that have that have also claimed that they were part of Munchausen's by proxy. I don't know if you know Eminem's song Cleaning Out My Closet in two thousand and two. The lines from his song essentially mentioned Munchausen's and I'll read them for you. Witnessing your mama popping prescription bills in the kitchen, bitching that someone's always going.
00:10:53
Speaker 3: Through a going, person missing, gone through public housing systems, victim Munchausen syndrome.
00:10:59
Speaker 1: My whole life, I was need to believe I was sick when I wasn't.
00:11:02
Speaker 3: To like who?
00:11:03
Speaker 2: Now? Who?
00:11:03
Speaker 1: What makes it sick to you? My stomach doesn't it? Wasn't it the reason?
00:11:07
Speaker 2: You mean? So? I think probably the best way to find out what it all means is to talk to someone that's an expert.
00:11:13
Speaker 7: Tim Watson Monroe, a criminal psychologist, former National Chairperson of the Forensic College of the Australian Psychological Society, former academic. I've worked in this space for about forty six years now. I've assessed in excess of twenty five thousand people during that time.
00:11:33
Speaker 2: Tim, we're not going to talk in specifics about the people involved in the case that we're talking about right now that's being investigated, but we are interested in Munchausen's by proxy, which I believe has a new name now.
00:11:47
Speaker 7: It's not described as a factitious disorder imposed on another. Basically, what it means is a person seeks attention through presenting their child at hospitals and other medical facilities, claiming that they're ill, and they keep going back. So there's a rain of diagnostic in dishea of Munchausen's by proxy. I prefer that term. I think it's sort of it's a bit more automatic paic in a way, but they've changed the name of it. There's various symptoms of it. The offender, if I could use that term, maybe the patient is more appropriate, may add blood to the child's urine or steel. They may with whole food so the child looks like they are unable to gain weight. They may heat up thermometers so it looks like the child has a fever. They can make up lab results, and they can give the child child drugs to get them to throw up or to have diarrhea. So it's a very serious condition and potentially life threatening for the child.
00:12:54
Speaker 3: I'm really interested to know They're like, are the other diagnosises that are involved in that, because to me, it's like, is that sociopathic?
00:13:02
Speaker 1: Is it psychopathic or is it really just a standalone dyke on its own.
00:13:07
Speaker 7: It's a good question. There's some research that now suggests that about fifty eight to sixty percent of people diagnosed with Munchausen's by proxy can also reliably be diagnosed as suffering a borderline personality disorder, and a borderline personality disorder is a construct referrable to a person's personality. They have all sorts of psychological problems that may derive from an early childhood, sexual abuse, trauma, and so on. So this research indicates that there's possibly some overlap between BBT BPD. I should say, as it's described in Munchausen's by proxy or as it's now known, factitious disorder imposed on another. I think the important component to it is that these people are not insane. They're in touch with reality, they are aware of what they're doing, and they have a clear consequence in mind. And that clear consequence is to get attention vicariously through presenting an ill child. And I can recall probably three or four decades ago now, it was when shortly after I morved to Melbourne from Sydney and I became involved with a forensic psychiatrist, the late doctor David Syme, a brilliant man, and this was a case where a mother was having her child taken from her by the government because she had been diagnosed with Munchausen's by proxy. The context of the case was this that she had repeatedly presented a child. I think it was the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, a very keen, perhaps over Zella's social worker had seen her a couple of times and wrote on her notes Munchausen's by proxy with a question mark. And it's a classic example of how these things can then gather a life of their own. So what happened with this case.
It went up the line, a psychologist saw it, and by the time a psychiatrist saw it, it was more or less established that she had Munchausen's by proxy. There was no evaluation of her, It was just the paper chain that led to that diagnosis. The reality of the story was this that this poor woman had lost a baby to sudden infant death syndrome cock death, and she was understandably anxious about the health and wellbeing of the next child, and so whenever there was symptoms of illness to reassure herself, she would present the child at a hospital, and eventually she became well known down there, and consequently the diagnosis we gave evidence in that case and the child was returned to her. The court accepted that she didn't have one Charles and spar proxy in passing. It's such a rare phenomenon anyway, you know you'd be lucky to encounter one one Charleis and spa proxy case in your career. My career is in a forty six years plus and that's the only one that I've ever been involved with. But these people are not insane. They're psychologically troubled. Clearly. If there's a concommonant diagnosis of personality disorder or borderline personality disorder, often these people are very troubled individuals, but not Matt.
00:16:47
Speaker 2: Sim also has a podcast of his own called Motive and Method.
00:16:50
Speaker 7: I do a podcast with doctor Zanth Mallett, an eminent, well known, renowned criminologist, assays your professor of criminology at the University of Newcastle, and our podcast is titled Motive and Method and so we look at various types of crimes and the motive and method behind them, doing a deep dive into some of the more notorious cases around Australian overseas. One of the ones we looked at, which is kind of on point here but not quite was that of Lucy let Be. I'm sure your listeners are aware of Lucy let Be. She was a nurse in a hospital in the UK and she ended up being charged with the murder of quite a number of neonatal babies who are in high intensity care. What drives these people? Who knows? I think with Munchausen's by proxy or Munchausen's, it's in need to have attention, it's a need to be part of the scene. And often these people are well versed in matters medical. They understand her hotel routines and so on. They will present the child time and time again with symptoms it may have been created by administering medication and so on, and they want to be very involved in the process of seeing what's wrong with a child. The interesting thing is, and it's one of the diagnostic features, is that generally these children, once they're discharged from hospital, they get well, then they come back again because they're sick, and eventually the red flags are waving loudly in the wind and people take a closer look at it.
00:18:32
Speaker 3: Does someone just kind of get them more chousened by proxy diagnosis or is there often kind of a history of them having more chousend themselves?
00:18:43
Speaker 1: You know, like, is there sort.
00:18:44
Speaker 3: Of a history to it, or does it sort of just like come about the second that they have a child, or do you find there's often a correlation between the two.
00:18:54
Speaker 7: Look, it's a very good question. My understanding is that it presents when the child arrives, a person who has Munchausen's is busy enough seeking medical attention for themselves. It may be triggered by their own childhood trauma, It may be triggered by higher levels of anxiety. But as the research indicates, a fair percentage of these people have a concomitant diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, which means that they are aware of what they're doing. It's almost it almost becomes compulsive for them. So it's not a form of malingering. It's an illness if I could put it that way, where people need to have attention vicariously through presenting a sick child at a hospital.
00:19:46
Speaker 2: Tim is it criminally defensible in general terms?
00:19:50
Speaker 7: The person has to be charged with a crime, and I guess if there was a crime, it would be over medicating a child, creating illness and a child and so on. But if I understand your question correctly, is this a diagnosis which would possibly give the sufferer a defense to their behavior. My sort of sense of that is that it's not. It may be a diagnosis that gives the sufferer some mitigatory factors regarding their actions and so on, but it seems to me, as I've said, they're not insane, they're not criminally insane. The test of all this is whether they have mensrael, whether they're aware of what they're doing, and whether they're aware of the consequences of their behavior. It would only, i think, drift into the criminal jurisdiction if a crime against the child was committed. Arguably, in some of these cases, if not all of them, there are criminal actions that are being taken in terms of compromising the health and wellbeing of the child and sometimes leading to potential death and so on. That's certainly criminal behavior in my Yeah, So.
00:21:09
Speaker 2: There's a lot of people out there who really want to know more about who we are as cable and kind of how we are as parents, and how y'are in our relationship and how we get along with that band and all that sort of good stuff. I have been sick for over a week now and I am not here for it.
00:21:23
Speaker 1: Why can't I get better?
00:21:27
Speaker 2: She's like so out. Thanks for listening to this episode and supporting this story. Independent storytelling that shapes the world is what podshape really cares about right now, There's thousands of people listening to this show and our other true Crimes, and they're completely engaged. More than ten million Australians listen to podcasts each week. If you've ever thought about advertising your business in a podcast, there's a link to reach out in the show notes, or head to podshape dot com to book a free call.