TRANSCRIPT 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:11.119 --> 00:00:13.640
Welcome back to Gray Matters, the podcast to the Seaboard
2
00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:15.919
and Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State.
3
00:00:16.079 --> 00:00:19.280
I'm jace LINCTON, the Gray Center's Policy and Strategy Director.
4
00:00:19.960 --> 00:00:22.480
Today I'm excited to share with you another episode I
5
00:00:22.519 --> 00:00:25.359
had hoped to publish last fall. This panel from our
6
00:00:25.399 --> 00:00:29.519
October conference focused on anti trust policy. The lively discussion
7
00:00:29.559 --> 00:00:32.240
is still relevant as we await the Supreme Court's decision
8
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:35.679
in Trump v. Slaughter later this year. Moderated by Judge
9
00:00:35.679 --> 00:00:39.679
Douglas Ginsburg, the conversation is between former FTC Commissioner Noah
10
00:00:39.679 --> 00:00:44.119
Phillips and anti monopoly policy expert Matt Stoller. Enjoy it's
11
00:00:44.159 --> 00:00:44.719
a good day.
12
00:00:44.679 --> 00:00:47.000
For a panel like this or anything like me.
13
00:00:47.079 --> 00:00:50.039
You're watching the news and seeing that anti trust is
14
00:00:50.039 --> 00:00:53.280
a big conversation on the left and the right. Those
15
00:00:53.359 --> 00:00:57.960
new conversations happening. It's outside the silos, and so if
16
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:00.840
you enjoy what you're about to hear your own luck.
17
00:01:01.560 --> 00:01:04.760
But now I should introduce our moderator. We're pleased to
18
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:07.599
be joined by a Judge Ginsburg from the d C circuit.
19
00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:10.239
In addition to being a judge, he's one of the
20
00:01:10.239 --> 00:01:14.079
most important intellectual mentors we have at the Gray Center,
21
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:16.560
and we're grateful that he could be here this morning.
22
00:01:17.319 --> 00:01:19.760
Before joining the d C Circuit, he ran the Department
23
00:01:19.799 --> 00:01:23.680
of Justices Anti Trust Division as well as Elyra, and
24
00:01:23.719 --> 00:01:27.159
he remains a great scholar of anti trust law and
25
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:28.760
a professor at Scalia Law.
26
00:01:29.400 --> 00:01:30.519
Welcome, Judge Ginsburg.
27
00:01:30.599 --> 00:01:30.920
Thank you.
28
00:01:32.159 --> 00:01:39.319
I'm going to begin by somewhat unconventionally asking each of
29
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:43.680
our panelists here. Matt first, so just tell us what
30
00:01:43.760 --> 00:01:47.040
he is doing now and what he did once before. First,
31
00:01:47.079 --> 00:01:50.879
before that eating my job, my job, or your job
32
00:01:50.959 --> 00:01:51.799
or whatever it is you're do.
33
00:01:52.120 --> 00:01:55.719
Oh yeah, So this is DC, so we can have
34
00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:59.439
fake jobs, right. I am a director of research at
35
00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:01.239
the American mcliberty's Project.
36
00:02:01.239 --> 00:02:02.280
That's one fake job.
37
00:02:02.719 --> 00:02:05.959
Another one, I write a newsletter on monopolies called The
38
00:02:05.959 --> 00:02:09.400
Big Newsletter, which has about one hundred and seventy thousand subscribers,
39
00:02:09.680 --> 00:02:13.000
And so that's sort of a mix of analyzing the law.
40
00:02:13.039 --> 00:02:15.800
I'm not a lawyer, and I'm talking to people about
41
00:02:15.800 --> 00:02:17.199
their experience in the economy.
42
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:17.639
Perfect.
43
00:02:17.719 --> 00:02:18.919
Thank you, Noah.
44
00:02:19.319 --> 00:02:21.280
All right, so I don't think I can call any
45
00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:24.199
of your fake job. My name is Noah Fellows.
46
00:02:25.560 --> 00:02:28.280
Lawyer and private practice at Cravatswing and More, where I
47
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:32.400
practice antitrust law. For the record, I'm speaking only today
48
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:35.000
for myself, not for the firm or on behalf of
49
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:38.199
any of its clients. Before that was a Federal Trade
50
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:42.719
commissioner appointed by President Trump, serving also in the modern administration.
51
00:02:44.039 --> 00:02:47.599
Thank you so now the title of the panel is
52
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:53.360
well pramised on popularism, all right, as I trust.
53
00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:54.599
In the a populist era.
54
00:02:55.479 --> 00:03:00.360
So I thought, maybe again somewhat unconventionally, before we before
55
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:02.400
I let you discuss this, we.
56
00:03:02.479 --> 00:03:04.639
Put some facts on the table.
57
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:13.400
The first Trump administration generally followed a traditional approach to
58
00:03:13.879 --> 00:03:18.039
antitrust enforcement. There was an uptick in merger case There's
59
00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:21.879
no question about that. And they brought the first fully
60
00:03:22.039 --> 00:03:28.000
litigated challenge to a vertical merger in about forty years.
61
00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:32.840
That was the ill fated AT and T.
62
00:03:32.680 --> 00:03:34.000
Time Warner case.
63
00:03:35.240 --> 00:03:39.360
And then in addition, they brought cases under Section two
64
00:03:39.439 --> 00:03:45.000
of an opilization against Google for search and against Meta.
65
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:49.840
These were the first meaningful Section two cases since Microsoft
66
00:03:50.520 --> 00:03:54.639
had been decided in two thousand and one, six months
67
00:03:54.639 --> 00:03:59.719
after President Biden took office, he announced what he called
68
00:03:59.719 --> 00:04:04.400
a well at Fritze. First, he said that forty years earlier,
69
00:04:04.479 --> 00:04:09.199
the United States said quote chosen the wrong path was
70
00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:13.439
quote when it adopted the consumer Welfare standard and informed
71
00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:20.519
and I trusted policy with economic analysis. And he then
72
00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:23.879
announced a what he called the whole of Government
Load full transcript
Approach
73
00:04:23.959 --> 00:04:29.680
to Competition policy, which listed seventy two specific things more
74
00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:33.600
or less specific things to be done, some of which
75
00:04:33.600 --> 00:04:36.959
involved direct and I trust policy, but others of which
76
00:04:36.959 --> 00:04:43.800
involved competition as handled by the various regulatory agencies, so
77
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:48.920
for example, urging the Federal Maritime Commission to be more
78
00:04:49.439 --> 00:04:55.040
energetic in seeking competitive prices, and instructing for Food and
79
00:04:55.079 --> 00:04:59.759
Drug Administration to make hearing aids available without a doctor's prescription,
80
00:05:00.639 --> 00:05:05.040
which in fact they did. The President Biden's speech, together
81
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:08.720
with his nomination of Lisa Khans, who chaired the Federal
82
00:05:08.759 --> 00:05:13.000
Trade Commission, and Jonathan Canter as Assistant Attorney General for
83
00:05:13.079 --> 00:05:17.560
anti trust, signaled about one hundred and eighty degree turn
84
00:05:17.720 --> 00:05:22.399
against the economic approach that he, the President, had criticized,
85
00:05:23.279 --> 00:05:25.920
and the new administrators set out to.
86
00:05:28.120 --> 00:05:29.519
Alter policy in.
87
00:05:32.439 --> 00:05:36.279
I wouldn't say hasty, but as quickly as possible, by
88
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:41.519
rescinding at least a dozen policy statements, some of which
89
00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.000
were fairly recent, others of which dated.
90
00:05:43.720 --> 00:05:46.279
Back more than twenty five, almost thirty years.
91
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.000
And issuing several substitute policy statements of their own, the
92
00:05:52.040 --> 00:05:56.720
most prominent perhaps being the new interpretation of Section five
93
00:05:56.839 --> 00:06:01.360
of the Federal Trade Commission Act, making in an unfair
94
00:06:01.519 --> 00:06:05.439
method of competition to do anything that seemed in any
95
00:06:05.480 --> 00:06:11.040
way unsavory. They issued new merger guidelines, the most interesting
96
00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:16.519
hallmark of which is that they involved seventy case citations.
97
00:06:17.079 --> 00:06:19.759
There's nothing wrong with citing cases, but most of the
98
00:06:20.120 --> 00:06:24.120
preceding merger guidelines didn't really do that. They were explaining
99
00:06:24.160 --> 00:06:32.360
how the agency analyzed mergers. The new guidelines cite cases
100
00:06:32.399 --> 00:06:35.600
from the nineteen sixties. Supreme Court has not had a
101
00:06:35.639 --> 00:06:39.759
merger case substance of merger case since nineteen seventy four,
102
00:06:41.279 --> 00:06:44.519
and so these are all cases that in the nineteen
103
00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:47.480
sixties in which a market share of as little as
104
00:06:47.519 --> 00:06:50.920
five percent could bring down the wrath of the United
105
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:57.639
States on a merger. The guidelines to retained some economic principles,
106
00:06:57.639 --> 00:07:01.360
but they're basically back away from any thorough commitment to
107
00:07:02.439 --> 00:07:08.920
economic analysis. The agency, if FTC engaged in rule making
108
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:12.399
substance of competition rule making for the first time since
109
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:18.560
nineteen seventy three, issuing a rule that would make unlawful,
110
00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:25.160
unenforceable all non competition agreements and employment contracts except those
111
00:07:25.240 --> 00:07:29.000
for high level executives that were already in place. No
112
00:07:29.120 --> 00:07:35.079
new contracts of any sort could be validly enforced going forward.
113
00:07:35.639 --> 00:07:39.319
The current commission now has just about a week ago,
114
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:45.360
decided that after two district courts and joined the effectiveness
115
00:07:45.360 --> 00:07:49.120
of the non competition rule, that they would not defend
116
00:07:49.160 --> 00:07:56.319
the rule any further. Commissioner Slaughter, who was Commissioner that day,
117
00:07:58.879 --> 00:08:04.000
pointed out that APA proceeding in order to rescind that
118
00:08:04.160 --> 00:08:10.600
rule that has not yet been proposed. Despite the rhetorical
119
00:08:10.680 --> 00:08:16.759
excesses or at least flourishes of the Biden administration and
120
00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:22.199
I trust enforcers, they did not show any greater willingness
121
00:08:22.199 --> 00:08:26.160
to bring challenges than had the Trump administration. They did
122
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:29.600
pursue the cases that wereing investigated in the big tech
123
00:08:29.639 --> 00:08:33.559
cases that they were being investigated before they came in
124
00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:41.559
and added some additional ones. They doubled down on vertical mergers,
125
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:45.639
even though that didn't seem like a very promising avenue,
126
00:08:46.279 --> 00:08:52.720
and basically lost those cases. They brought eight cases under
127
00:08:52.840 --> 00:09:00.480
Section two and an opposition provisions, seven of which are
128
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:04.879
premised on familiar theories of harm, only one of which
129
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:09.120
was really in any way groundbreaking, and so and most
130
00:09:09.159 --> 00:09:12.120
of those, by the way, are still not fully litigated.
131
00:09:12.480 --> 00:09:12.840
And so.
132
00:09:14.279 --> 00:09:15.840
At the end of the day, I think we can
133
00:09:15.879 --> 00:09:19.799
say that the Trump administration took steps towards a more
134
00:09:19.919 --> 00:09:24.679
vigorous enforcement approach. That the Biden administration came in with
135
00:09:24.720 --> 00:09:30.320
a considerably more aggressive, maybe even extreme reform agenda, which
136
00:09:30.360 --> 00:09:35.879
it pursued by rewriting guidelines, promulgating rules, bringing
some more
137
00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:40.799
novel merger cases and Section two cases.
138
00:09:40.840 --> 00:09:43.519
But the residue.
139
00:09:43.039 --> 00:09:47.279
Let's say, when the litigation is all over, is somewhat modest. Now,
140
00:09:47.279 --> 00:09:49.960
if that's not a fair statement, Matt, you first corrects
141
00:09:49.960 --> 00:09:51.840
me on that if you want to add anything otherwise,
142
00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:54.080
we'll turn to the larger subject.
143
00:09:55.919 --> 00:09:57.879
Well, I guess I would disagree.
144
00:09:57.879 --> 00:10:00.799
I would take issue with a lot of the the framing.
145
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:07.519
But my general observation is that we're talking about anti
146
00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:11.000
trust in a populist era. And the last panel was
147
00:10:11.039 --> 00:10:15.320
about the independence of the Federal Reserve, which is very dear.
148
00:10:15.159 --> 00:10:15.679
To my heart.
149
00:10:15.799 --> 00:10:19.679
Because it is a very populist question, and I don't
150
00:10:19.720 --> 00:10:24.159
think you can disentangle the tremendous lack of faith that
151
00:10:24.240 --> 00:10:27.919
Americans feel in their society on both sides of the aisle,
152
00:10:28.559 --> 00:10:32.559
from the enormous concentrations of power in the hands of
153
00:10:32.600 --> 00:10:36.919
Wall Street, in the hands of dominant firms, in the
154
00:10:36.960 --> 00:10:41.200
hands of often regulators who fuse the interests of the
155
00:10:41.240 --> 00:10:46.720
state with dominant private, coercive actors bork, which is, he
156
00:10:46.799 --> 00:10:49.960
created sort of the basis for what I would consider
157
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:55.759
a relatively lawless form of antitrust, hated populism.
158
00:10:56.080 --> 00:10:58.120
It's all over the anti trust paradox.
159
00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:01.159
He talked about populism being terrible, and he talked about
160
00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:04.679
anti trust needing to be done scientifically. If you look
161
00:11:04.840 --> 00:11:07.759
at what Donald Trump talked about in twenty sixteen, and
162
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:10.720
I'm a Democrat, so this made me very jealous. He
163
00:11:10.759 --> 00:11:14.039
talked about the AT and T Time Warner merger on
164
00:11:14.159 --> 00:11:17.000
the trail as a threat to democracy. It is a
165
00:11:17.120 --> 00:11:19.360
very political statement, and I don't think you can get
166
00:11:19.399 --> 00:11:22.919
away from the fact that antitrust and corporate power is
167
00:11:22.960 --> 00:11:26.159
now a political issue in a way that it hasn't been,
168
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:28.919
maybe since the nineteen thirties, maybe the fifties.
169
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:31.000
However, we want to talk about it.
170
00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:34.919
Just okay, So sixty five percent of Americans play video games. Yesterday,
171
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:38.080
Microsoft just increased the price of I see you nodding, right,
172
00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:40.879
It's like annoying. There is the price of game Pass,
173
00:11:40.919 --> 00:11:42.840
which is essentially the Netflix for video games.
174
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:44.000
Really dramatically.
175
00:11:44.759 --> 00:11:46.639
Two years ago, there was an attempt to stop a
176
00:11:46.639 --> 00:11:50.000
merger between Microsoft and Activision which enabled them to do
177
00:11:50.080 --> 00:11:54.039
this price hike, and the judge said, no, there's no
178
00:11:54.120 --> 00:11:56.679
case here. And you see that over and over and over.
179
00:11:56.799 --> 00:11:59.279
I deal with people who are in consolidated industries and
180
00:11:59.320 --> 00:12:03.679
they are terrified and they're getting ripped off. That system
181
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:07.000
of private coercion is the system that we're dealing with today.
182
00:12:07.399 --> 00:12:10.320
And Trump, in his first time, I would argue, did
183
00:12:10.519 --> 00:12:13.799
had sort of different I think both parties have multiple
184
00:12:13.919 --> 00:12:19.399
have disagree on internally, and Trump certainly brought important vertical
185
00:12:19.399 --> 00:12:22.320
merger challenges. He brought two important Section two cases. He
186
00:12:22.440 --> 00:12:27.480
started on labor enforcement. He definitely adhered to the Board
187
00:12:27.519 --> 00:12:30.279
framework in some areas, but broke with it dramatically in others.
188
00:12:30.320 --> 00:12:34.080
And I would say the Biden administration antitrust broke with
189
00:12:34.159 --> 00:12:36.679
it even more dramatically. But in other areas of the
190
00:12:36.679 --> 00:12:40.279
Biden administration you did see tremendous attempts to consolidate power.
191
00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:44.720
What is about bringing those monopoly cases that breaks.
192
00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:45.320
With the tradition?
193
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.559
Well, I think what if you look at what they
194
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:49.840
did with you're talking.
195
00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:52.120
About the well Try and tech cases you just manchined.
196
00:12:52.159 --> 00:12:54.600
Well, I think just getting around Trinco would be the big,
197
00:12:54.720 --> 00:12:57.639
you know, a really significant change. But just bringing them
198
00:12:57.639 --> 00:13:01.159
anopolization case after twenty five years of not bringing any
199
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:04.879
has a tremendous effect on business behavior.
200
00:13:04.919 --> 00:13:06.399
If you look at the number of.
201
00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:11.080
Private anti trust cases, it jumped from something like four
202
00:13:11.159 --> 00:13:13.960
hundred to seven hundred from twenty twenty three to twenty
203
00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:17.559
twenty four, and it's jumping again this year because business
204
00:13:17.559 --> 00:13:21.360
people are saying, oh, that kind of syst that structure
205
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:25.039
of Google or Apple or Ticketmaster, that kind of looks
206
00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:27.919
like my industry, and they're starting to call lawyers and
207
00:13:28.559 --> 00:13:29.080
anti trust.
208
00:13:29.080 --> 00:13:30.080
I mean, you would probably know this.
209
00:13:30.120 --> 00:13:33.200
There's a lot more interest in well, you probably add
210
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:36.440
another zero to your salary. There's a lot more interest
211
00:13:36.759 --> 00:13:41.039
in anti trust because of the just actually using the law.
212
00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:43.679
So just using the law was pretty meaningful. But I
213
00:13:43.720 --> 00:13:47.440
also think trying to address tech platforms after a series
214
00:13:47.480 --> 00:13:49.480
of cases that made it much much harder to do
215
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:52.360
so and getting around them is very significant move on
216
00:13:52.440 --> 00:13:57.600
both both the first Trump administration, the Biden administration, and
217
00:13:57.639 --> 00:13:59.840
then the second Trump administration. I do think there are
218
00:13:59.919 --> 00:14:02.840
very very significant differences between the second Trump administration and
219
00:14:02.879 --> 00:14:03.639
the Biden administration.
220
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:04.799
But I'll leave it there.
221
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:09.759
Oh, we've had only a few months of it, so okay, Noah,
222
00:14:09.960 --> 00:14:10.279
would you?
223
00:14:11.120 --> 00:14:14.480
So there's a lot to unpack in those comments.
224
00:14:15.039 --> 00:14:17.639
Let me say a few things starts, and I just
225
00:14:17.679 --> 00:14:19.679
have to do this because I'm a former FDC person.
226
00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:24.200
Those were not the only Section two cases brought from
227
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:27.399
the Trump administration. There were other Section two cases as well.
228
00:14:27.679 --> 00:14:29.799
There was a conduct case and there was a merger case,
229
00:14:30.039 --> 00:14:34.000
both from the FTC. To the extent we have some
230
00:14:34.120 --> 00:14:38.840
qualifier on this, like significant or whatever. The big Tech
231
00:14:38.840 --> 00:14:42.080
case is definitely dealt with brands that are much more recognizable.
232
00:14:42.120 --> 00:14:44.559
But it's actually not true to say that there wasn't
233
00:14:45.159 --> 00:14:48.679
other Section two enforcement, and I think had importance to recognize,
234
00:14:48.960 --> 00:14:52.360
just as there was quite vigorous merger enforcement in the
235
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:54.799
first Trump administration. But I want to come back to
236
00:14:54.840 --> 00:14:56.679
sort of the framing of the panel, which is about
237
00:14:56.720 --> 00:15:01.919
populism and antitrust. At least to me, populism is a
238
00:15:02.080 --> 00:15:05.759
form of politics. It's sort of a political instinct, and
239
00:15:05.879 --> 00:15:09.320
it can be very very effective in, you know, bringing
240
00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:14.080
attention to and popularity to a kind of law
enforcement. Right,
241
00:15:14.639 --> 00:15:17.159
It's certainly true people are signing up for anti trust
242
00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:20.600
classes intros. I don't know that it impacts what I make,
243
00:15:20.799 --> 00:15:23.080
but it certainly impacts like law students who are interested
244
00:15:23.080 --> 00:15:24.000
in the practice.
245
00:15:23.639 --> 00:15:25.720
Of law better try harder than help you out.
246
00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:33.799
It can also, right sometimes be a means by which
247
00:15:35.519 --> 00:15:39.519
enforcers are encouraged to do more of something. It can
248
00:15:39.559 --> 00:15:43.240
be a means by which legislation is adopted. Right, popular
249
00:15:43.320 --> 00:15:47.240
movements can lead politicians to adopt laws. There is some
250
00:15:47.320 --> 00:15:50.120
truth in that with respect to in particular, I think
251
00:15:50.159 --> 00:15:53.039
the Sherman anti trust of eighteen ninety, right, there was
252
00:15:53.399 --> 00:15:57.639
popular concern with the trusts, right, and they were dealt
253
00:15:57.679 --> 00:15:59.360
with to some extent at the state level, But there
254
00:15:59.399 --> 00:16:01.600
was felt a need for federal law, and that's what
255
00:16:01.720 --> 00:16:06.279
Congress adopted. What populism, though, is not good at and
256
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:08.919
I think this is important to recognize is it's not
257
00:16:09.039 --> 00:16:14.120
a particularly good guide for how you do the day
258
00:16:14.159 --> 00:16:17.639
to day that constitutes antitrust. It's not a good guide
259
00:16:18.039 --> 00:16:22.279
for deciding whether someone is liable if you're really trying
260
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:24.960
to apply the rule of law. Right, if all I
261
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:27.600
know is who's doing it, and that's the answer to
262
00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:30.320
my question, it's probably not a rule of law that's
263
00:16:30.360 --> 00:16:35.600
being applied. It's also not a particularly helpful guide for
264
00:16:36.240 --> 00:16:37.440
advising companies.
265
00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:38.159
Right.
266
00:16:38.279 --> 00:16:41.519
So, like the business that I'm in now is helping
267
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:45.679
people understand is that deal doable? Can I engage in
268
00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:50.200
this course of conduct? And simply saying something like you know,
269
00:16:50.799 --> 00:16:54.759
there's too much consolidation or corporate power is bad doesn't
270
00:16:54.799 --> 00:16:55.240
give me.
271
00:16:55.240 --> 00:16:56.360
A rule to apply.
272
00:16:56.919 --> 00:16:58.919
And when we're dealing with the rule of law, those
273
00:16:58.960 --> 00:17:02.679
are critical things, right, answers to those more difficult questions.
274
00:17:02.960 --> 00:17:06.359
I would also add this in particular with respect to legislation.
275
00:17:07.640 --> 00:17:11.200
We saw like a lot of political unity around the
276
00:17:11.240 --> 00:17:13.400
premise that
we should hold big tech accountable.
277
00:17:13.480 --> 00:17:13.599
Right.
278
00:17:13.640 --> 00:17:16.079
That was a phrase that we heard constantly from the hill.
279
00:17:16.119 --> 00:17:19.119
We heard it from Democrats, from Republicans. But when you
280
00:17:19.440 --> 00:17:22.400
peeled the onion just a bit, what you learned is
281
00:17:22.400 --> 00:17:26.279
that different people wanted to hold different companies accountable for
282
00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:29.680
different things, and the different like the different big tech
283
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:33.599
companies were doing different things right that were upsetting to
284
00:17:33.680 --> 00:17:39.279
different groups of people. And when we're just drafting legislation, right,
285
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:41.200
one of the things we have to grapple with is
286
00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:42.119
the effect.
287
00:17:41.720 --> 00:17:43.279
That that legislation is going to have.
288
00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:46.279
And what you saw in the legislative process, I think
289
00:17:47.000 --> 00:17:52.319
we disagree with this characterization was legislators dealing with the
290
00:17:52.359 --> 00:17:56.200
fact that maybe the thing that they were interested in
291
00:17:56.279 --> 00:17:59.599
remedying wasn't really the thing that the legislation was going
292
00:17:59.640 --> 00:18:03.559
to or maybe even they had a thing they had
293
00:18:03.559 --> 00:18:07.400
a concern that was like zero, and their partner on
294
00:18:07.440 --> 00:18:09.079
the other side of the aisle had a concern that
295
00:18:09.200 --> 00:18:11.319
was like one, and there was no way we were
296
00:18:11.319 --> 00:18:12.559
going to resolve these together.
297
00:18:12.759 --> 00:18:14.039
So I'll give an example of this.
298
00:18:15.519 --> 00:18:17.359
You wrote a piece about when I testified about this,
299
00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:18.559
so we can have this conversation.
300
00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:19.640
When I was in.
301
00:18:19.599 --> 00:18:24.200
Office at the FTC, Democrats would say that because of
302
00:18:24.240 --> 00:18:28.480
the absence of competition in social media, we have too
303
00:18:28.599 --> 00:18:32.680
much bad stuff on social media, and Republicans would say,
304
00:18:33.079 --> 00:18:35.920
because of the absence of competition on social media, we
305
00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:38.759
have too much censorship, meaning they're keeping too much stuff
306
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:42.319
out of social media. Both people see a problem, and
307
00:18:42.359 --> 00:18:45.920
they're both invoking principles of competition, but they think that
308
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:49.079
competition is going to yield opposite results, and the two
309
00:18:49.079 --> 00:18:52.240
are unlikely to be true at the same time. And
310
00:18:52.319 --> 00:18:56.559
certainly the legislation that they were considering wouldn't address both
311
00:18:56.599 --> 00:19:00.119
together because they had the
opposite goal in mind. And
312
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:02.559
I think that's a critical thing when we think about
313
00:19:02.559 --> 00:19:06.440
populism and anti trust that often anti trust or generally
314
00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:09.160
anti trust is actually dealing in specifics that are a
315
00:19:09.200 --> 00:19:12.319
lot more granular. So now I've been talking too much.
316
00:19:13.359 --> 00:19:16.319
I have not seen peasants with pitchforks around the Ft
317
00:19:16.519 --> 00:19:21.240
shape building. So tell me about this widespread disaffection you've described.
318
00:19:21.960 --> 00:19:24.279
Well, so you know, it's easy to focus on the
319
00:19:24.640 --> 00:19:28.720
tech firms, I am, but that isn't the main I mean,
320
00:19:28.759 --> 00:19:31.880
there were a number of you know that anti trust
321
00:19:31.960 --> 00:19:37.119
was more significant across the economy. I will I will
322
00:19:37.119 --> 00:19:40.759
say there's a little bit of Wall Street was freaking
323
00:19:40.799 --> 00:19:42.960
out for four years of the Biden administration.
324
00:19:43.200 --> 00:19:44.519
At Lee Nukhan and Jonathan Canter.
325
00:19:44.799 --> 00:19:47.400
You turned on CNBC every single day they were mad
326
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:51.519
that they were stopping mergers and or that they were
327
00:19:51.680 --> 00:19:55.920
trying to bring cases, and there was a you know,
328
00:19:56.119 --> 00:19:58.759
I often hear from the defense bar that, oh, well
329
00:19:58.759 --> 00:20:00.519
they didn't really bring that many cases. Is they didn't
330
00:20:00.519 --> 00:20:02.880
actually do anything very different, and they weren't very successful.
331
00:20:02.920 --> 00:20:05.000
There's a little bit of that old Woody Allen joke
332
00:20:05.079 --> 00:20:07.559
where he says, you know, the food is terrible and
333
00:20:07.599 --> 00:20:11.119
the portions are so small. Right, it's not that funny
334
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:14.400
joke because considering the reaction in this audience, it's a
335
00:20:14.400 --> 00:20:14.880
good joke.
336
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:16.039
I like that joke.
337
00:20:17.079 --> 00:20:19.519
Thank you for the it's always better if you sell
338
00:20:19.680 --> 00:20:20.759
you No, it's bad.
339
00:20:20.839 --> 00:20:22.359
Jokes are better if you have to explain them. Just
340
00:20:22.400 --> 00:20:23.119
an fyi.
341
00:20:24.319 --> 00:20:28.880
They come on laugh people there, But there isn't there's
342
00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:31.319
an element here of there was a significant change and
343
00:20:31.359 --> 00:20:32.519
the capital markets felt it.
344
00:20:32.839 --> 00:20:35.400
You can't just say, oh, it didn't happen. But they didn't.
345
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:37.559
They didn't really succeed, They didn't really do anything. Like
346
00:20:37.839 --> 00:20:39.799
Walshet was very mad, and they were mad for a reason.
347
00:20:39.839 --> 00:20:41.759
But I want to get to something that you
talked
348
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:44.400
about in terms of populism, because you're saying, like pop
349
00:20:44.440 --> 00:20:46.559
populism is not a very good guide for what to
350
00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:51.200
do or for how to organize, you know, legal cases,
351
00:20:51.480 --> 00:20:53.920
and I would I would make two observations about that.
352
00:20:53.960 --> 00:20:55.559
So first, I would bring an area where I think
353
00:20:55.559 --> 00:21:01.039
it's legitimate to use political guideposts to talk about enforcement priority.
354
00:21:01.079 --> 00:21:04.200
So last week you'll notice there was this Argentina bailout
355
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:07.759
and US soybean farmers are really angry about it because
356
00:21:08.480 --> 00:21:11.119
Argentina has a lot of soybean producers too, and so
357
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:13.039
the US is effectively bailing.
358
00:21:12.720 --> 00:21:14.880
Out their competitors.
359
00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:17.640
And so the Trump administration has promised a number of things.
360
00:21:17.640 --> 00:21:20.880
One of them is their own bailout. But another thing
361
00:21:20.920 --> 00:21:23.480
that they promised, and this was Brooke Rolins and Gale Slater,
362
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:27.359
was they were going to look into agricultural input costs
363
00:21:27.440 --> 00:21:29.759
because as the price of soybeans and other row crops
364
00:21:29.759 --> 00:21:33.119
have gone down, the input costs have not, and this
365
00:21:33.279 --> 00:21:35.079
is well understood in the industry.
366
00:21:35.119 --> 00:21:36.279
Farmers really mad about it.
367
00:21:36.400 --> 00:21:38.839
Now, I don't think that there is anything wrong with
368
00:21:39.039 --> 00:21:42.519
a president or an administration saying, look, we see a problem,
369
00:21:42.599 --> 00:21:44.880
a policy problem in the sector, and we are going
370
00:21:44.920 --> 00:21:47.920
to put these tools in this particular area because we
371
00:21:47.960 --> 00:21:50.960
think it is important for the national interest. So that
372
00:21:51.240 --> 00:21:53.880
would be an area where I think the frustration from
373
00:21:53.920 --> 00:21:56.240
farmers and yes they I mean they weren't holding pitchforks,
374
00:21:56.240 --> 00:21:58.880
but you know, it's the age of AI, so they
375
00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:02.000
automate that or something. So that would be a legitimate
376
00:22:02.039 --> 00:22:06.160
area where you see public frustration turning into political action.
377
00:22:06.240 --> 00:22:08.640
This didn't really happen in the Biden administration. Biden wouldn't
378
00:22:08.640 --> 00:22:10.160
talk about anti trust. None of the people in the
379
00:22:10.160 --> 00:22:12.640
White House would talk about it. It really was much
380
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:16.519
more oddly enough, there were structuralists. They were taking a
381
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:20.000
much more populist approach. They but the political people in.
382
00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:21.640
The White House weren't using it.
383
00:22:21.759 --> 00:22:24.160
The other part of where I think we're seeing this is,
384
00:22:24.960 --> 00:22:27.720
you know, Andrew Feruson, who's the chair of the FTC,
385
00:22:28.519 --> 00:22:33.920
is you know, using lots of talking about DEI and wokeness.
386
00:22:34.160 --> 00:22:39.039
And he allowed a merger which was probably unlawful, between
387
00:22:39.480 --> 00:22:43.920
Omnicom and ipp which is two of the four big
388
00:22:43.960 --> 00:22:47.160
advertising agencies, and he did it as long as they
389
00:22:47.240 --> 00:22:50.799
agreed to spend more money, essentially on conservative advertising. And
390
00:22:50.839 --> 00:22:54.200
we know this because Twitter executives were saying, and this
391
00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:56.759
was quoted in the Wall Street Journal, you better advertise
392
00:22:56.799 --> 00:22:59.680
on us or else you're going to have anti trust problems. Now,
393
00:22:59.759 --> 00:23:02.440
that form of that's very political.
394
00:23:02.920 --> 00:23:04.240
I would argue.
395
00:23:04.599 --> 00:23:09.160
It is just explicitly benefiting conservative interest troops and engaging
396
00:23:09.160 --> 00:23:11.599
in forms of speech control, and that is coming from
397
00:23:11.599 --> 00:23:14.279
the Trump administration. You've seen this with Jimmy Kimmel, You've
398
00:23:14.279 --> 00:23:16.160
seen it in a number of other areas. And I
399
00:23:16.200 --> 00:23:20.559
think that form of arbitrary coercion is one that Democrats
400
00:23:20.559 --> 00:23:23.119
are very attuned to right now, but it's also one
401
00:23:23.160 --> 00:23:25.640
that I think Republicans. You go back a few years ago,
402
00:23:26.079 --> 00:23:29.599
and Republicans would be deeply attuned to. I think they
403
00:23:29.599 --> 00:23:33.000
would argue similar forms of arbitrary coercion. And I don't
404
00:23:33.000 --> 00:23:35.400
think you can get away from this problem that there
405
00:23:35.480 --> 00:23:38.640
is just arbitrary coercion going on in the economy writ large,
406
00:23:38.880 --> 00:23:41.079
and that there's a perception that the other side of
407
00:23:41.119 --> 00:23:45.599
the aisle is fusing the state with arbitrary coercive private
408
00:23:45.680 --> 00:23:48.599
entities to enact their own policy agenda. And that's why
409
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:51.759
we're kind of beyond the era of bork and technocracy.
410
00:23:51.920 --> 00:23:53.799
You might want to bring it back, but it's gone.
411
00:23:54.200 --> 00:23:56.519
It's over, and we just see that that both parties
412
00:23:56.599 --> 00:23:58.640
have kind of abandoned it, so there really needs to
413
00:23:58.680 --> 00:24:04.920
be some more theoretical or I guess the conservative anti
414
00:24:04.920 --> 00:24:09.119
trust is under theorized because conservatives have not chosen whether
415
00:24:09.440 --> 00:24:13.960
they want to create liberty from
arbitrary coersion for everyone
416
00:24:14.400 --> 00:24:17.960
or fuse that arbitrary coersion with their own political leaders
417
00:24:18.000 --> 00:24:20.240
and enact a policy. Again, I don't think Democrats have
418
00:24:20.279 --> 00:24:23.160
necessarily made that choice either, But that is those are
419
00:24:23.200 --> 00:24:25.720
the stakes, and they're very important stakes.
420
00:24:26.799 --> 00:24:31.119
Yeah, a lot to unpack there, I think I note
421
00:24:31.119 --> 00:24:31.759
a few things.
422
00:24:31.799 --> 00:24:33.960
First of all, it's not clear to me is your
423
00:24:34.079 --> 00:24:38.079
position that that's good or bad?
424
00:24:38.960 --> 00:24:42.359
Like you seem to be like in favor.
425
00:24:42.039 --> 00:24:44.839
Of populism, but then you're criticizing the way that Trump
426
00:24:44.920 --> 00:24:49.400
administration is whether the second Trump administration is approaching it.
427
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:52.000
And I guess one of the things that I noted
428
00:24:52.240 --> 00:24:54.400
or tried to note before is that one of the
429
00:24:54.440 --> 00:24:58.039
difficulties with populism is that sometimes we're at a level
430
00:24:58.039 --> 00:25:01.839
of sloveneering that it doesn't really give you a helpful guidepost.
431
00:25:02.000 --> 00:25:06.880
So it's not clear, like you're opposed to arbitrary coercion. Okay,
432
00:25:07.400 --> 00:25:10.119
and let's unpack what that means. So I guess I
433
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:12.319
don't know kind of the direction that you want to
434
00:25:12.359 --> 00:25:12.559
go in.
435
00:25:12.680 --> 00:25:13.359
I know that you.
436
00:25:13.359 --> 00:25:19.359
Want less corporate power, however you define that, And I
437
00:25:19.400 --> 00:25:21.799
know you want more government power, and I guess be
438
00:25:21.920 --> 00:25:23.480
unnecessarily true, but I'll go.
439
00:25:24.799 --> 00:25:25.240
I can I go?
440
00:25:25.319 --> 00:25:29.079
Can I give an example two moderators for sorry.
441
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:33.920
So, FTC in the Biden administration did two things that
442
00:25:33.960 --> 00:25:37.720
were very interesting, both of which were alluded to by
443
00:25:37.759 --> 00:25:44.079
Judge Ginsburg. One is, they introduced a redefinition of Section
444
00:25:44.200 --> 00:25:45.920
five of the FTC Act. So the way to think
445
00:25:45.920 --> 00:25:49.039
about this is like the FTC Act covers everything in
446
00:25:49.079 --> 00:25:52.359
the Sherman Act and then a margin outside it, and
447
00:25:52.599 --> 00:25:56.799
the scope of that margin has been debated for more
448
00:25:56.839 --> 00:25:58.880
than one hundred years, like one hundred and ten years
449
00:25:58.880 --> 00:26:03.960
since the FTC meant to being in nineteen fifteen. What
450
00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:07.440
the FTC effectively wrote in that document was that they
451
00:26:07.480 --> 00:26:11.200
could condemn whatever they want. At the same time, they
452
00:26:11.240 --> 00:26:13.519
were pushing the notion so that's the Section five state,
453
00:26:13.559 --> 00:26:17.519
that's the section plausive, And at the same time they
454
00:26:17.519 --> 00:26:21.079
were pushing the notion that they could fashion regulations around
455
00:26:21.160 --> 00:26:24.880
Section five. This arose in the context of noncompete agreements.
456
00:26:25.039 --> 00:26:28.720
There is something at least to me, terrifically concerning about
457
00:26:28.759 --> 00:26:31.279
making the statement that you can condemn what you want
458
00:26:31.279 --> 00:26:32.880
and I'm not going to let you know what it is,
459
00:26:33.240 --> 00:26:36.759
and also I can establish regulations around it. Like that's
460
00:26:36.799 --> 00:26:39.640
an awesome amount of power. And that was very much
461
00:26:39.759 --> 00:26:43.559
core to at least as I understood the anti trust
462
00:26:43.559 --> 00:26:44.440
reform project.
463
00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:48.960
So notably, the section five says that unfair methods of
464
00:26:49.920 --> 00:26:52.559
competition are barred, and one of the things that you
465
00:26:52.640 --> 00:26:55.839
will sort of see. And I've been thinking a lot
466
00:26:55.839 --> 00:26:59.440
about the moral economy, right, and it is weird in
467
00:26:59.480 --> 00:27:01.160
a sort of a found me weird moment, and I
468
00:27:01.160 --> 00:27:03.359
find the Conservative project. I really like this because you
469
00:27:03.359 --> 00:27:05.480
guys always go to first principles, and I'm a Democrat.
470
00:27:05.519 --> 00:27:06.960
We're not allowed to do that. All we get to
471
00:27:07.000 --> 00:27:09.039
do is worship the institution. So I like coming here.
472
00:27:09.240 --> 00:27:11.559
But it is really weird that we have a society
473
00:27:11.599 --> 00:27:15.119
that's full of sports, gambling and pornography and all of
474
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:17.640
these things that you know, and they're considered parts of
475
00:27:17.680 --> 00:27:20.240
our speech or freedom, and like that was never like
476
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:23.400
that's crazy if you go back to any other part
477
00:27:23.400 --> 00:27:27.599
of American history and yet to talk about yourselves as originalists,
478
00:27:27.640 --> 00:27:30.720
like that doesn't that just doesn't make any sense. So,
479
00:27:31.640 --> 00:27:34.720
you know, there were there were moral questions about you
480
00:27:34.759 --> 00:27:38.839
could never you could not patent things that helped gambling,
481
00:27:38.920 --> 00:27:39.200
Like that.
482
00:27:39.240 --> 00:27:41.359
Was something that existed until the nineteen sixties.
483
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:44.200
From the early eighteen hundreds, there was an all set
484
00:27:44.240 --> 00:27:47.920
of moral implications in our economic order. And one of
485
00:27:47.960 --> 00:27:52.480
them is the concept of unfairness right, which which you
486
00:27:52.480 --> 00:27:56.279
know is all over
our statutes. And economists and defense
487
00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:58.880
lawyers just hate the concept of unfairness. They're like, oh,
488
00:27:58.920 --> 00:28:01.119
I can't define it. Oh my god, I don't know,
489
00:28:01.359 --> 00:28:03.519
Like how do I even know what's unfair and what's not?
490
00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:06.240
And then you talk to normal people and they're just
491
00:28:06.240 --> 00:28:09.720
getting screwed and harmed, and we've all been cheated, like
492
00:28:09.920 --> 00:28:11.720
every single one of us has been cheated, and we
493
00:28:11.759 --> 00:28:15.000
all know what unfairness is. Now there are definitions in
494
00:28:15.039 --> 00:28:17.920
section five. The section five statement. You know may just
495
00:28:18.079 --> 00:28:21.119
cited Supreme Court case after Supreme Court case saying this
496
00:28:21.200 --> 00:28:22.960
is what's unfair, this is what's not unfair. You know,
497
00:28:23.000 --> 00:28:24.640
it has to be a business method, it has to
498
00:28:24.640 --> 00:28:27.880
address competition. There are some market definition question there are
499
00:28:28.079 --> 00:28:31.119
Indishia here. It's not just whatever you want, but it
500
00:28:31.200 --> 00:28:33.960
is a moral statement, and it is saying that the
501
00:28:34.079 --> 00:28:38.400
idea that we need to just listen to what theoretical
502
00:28:38.480 --> 00:28:42.359
and speculative and unwieldy economic models say in terms of output,
503
00:28:42.359 --> 00:28:44.480
that that is not what the law means, and if
504
00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:46.519
you want it to mean that, then you should change
505
00:28:46.519 --> 00:28:47.559
the law to mean that.
506
00:28:48.079 --> 00:28:51.079
So, in a sense, I think a better.
507
00:28:50.839 --> 00:28:52.799
Example would be to look at what happened in twenty
508
00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:57.519
fifteen when Josh Wright, who who is somebody who was
509
00:28:57.519 --> 00:29:00.880
at George Mason, you know, was on the the FTC
510
00:29:00.960 --> 00:29:04.240
and he got and he was very influential, and he
511
00:29:04.319 --> 00:29:10.119
got the FTC to unanimously under Obama say that section five,
512
00:29:10.240 --> 00:29:14.359
which was explicitly written not in reaction to the Sherman Acts,
513
00:29:14.359 --> 00:29:16.920
because Congress said, no, no, this is the Sherman Act doesn't
514
00:29:16.920 --> 00:29:19.720
cover enough. He said no, no, Actually, what we need
515
00:29:19.759 --> 00:29:22.640
to do is we need to cabin our own authority
516
00:29:22.920 --> 00:29:26.920
to consumer welfare. The Sherman Act, Clayton Ax KNOCKO out
517
00:29:27.039 --> 00:29:30.240
of those bounds. And to me, that is just lawless.
518
00:29:30.400 --> 00:29:33.680
Those are just enforcers saying we're going to ignore what
519
00:29:33.880 --> 00:29:37.039
Congress said, and that is I think characteristic of the
520
00:29:37.079 --> 00:29:40.759
old technocratic model, which you saw again
with Robinson Patman
521
00:29:40.960 --> 00:29:42.880
was another example where they just said, yeah, we don't
522
00:29:42.920 --> 00:29:44.759
like the law, we're not going to enforce it. And
523
00:29:44.799 --> 00:29:47.480
I don't understand how you can think about the rule
524
00:29:47.480 --> 00:29:51.559
of law as a meaningful, binding set of constraints on
525
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:53.440
society if you can just sort of pick and.
526
00:29:53.480 --> 00:29:56.119
Choose what you enforce and what you don't enforce.
527
00:29:56.200 --> 00:29:58.559
That's sort of what I saw with this old model
528
00:29:58.599 --> 00:30:02.680
of you know, of technocratic anti trust. I think we
529
00:30:02.759 --> 00:30:06.119
have serious problems with the new models of thinking about
530
00:30:06.839 --> 00:30:09.519
corporate power as well. But I just wanted to say
531
00:30:09.519 --> 00:30:12.000
we're beyond that old model for a lot of reasons,
532
00:30:12.400 --> 00:30:15.240
and we have to theorize new ways of thinking about
533
00:30:15.240 --> 00:30:15.960
this body of law.
534
00:30:16.640 --> 00:30:18.720
Can I speak to this.
535
00:30:18.680 --> 00:30:21.799
Moral economy as chief that you've phraised. It's really interesting.
536
00:30:22.119 --> 00:30:25.640
We used to have a joke at the FTC that,
537
00:30:25.799 --> 00:30:34.960
like gambling and liquor, we were sometimes protecting competition in
538
00:30:35.039 --> 00:30:38.400
things that were bad. Right, there's consumer demand for a product,
539
00:30:38.960 --> 00:30:45.960
maybe there's regulation, maybe there isn't. Nonetheless, there can be
540
00:30:46.039 --> 00:30:48.359
competition in that thing. There are people who think that
541
00:30:48.440 --> 00:30:53.400
video games are bad. I have a profoundly different perspective
542
00:30:53.440 --> 00:30:54.599
on this as a parent.
543
00:30:54.400 --> 00:30:55.359
Than I did as a child.
544
00:30:56.160 --> 00:30:59.400
I mean, in fact, I will hear myself like sounding
545
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:01.440
like my dad when I talk to my son about it.
546
00:31:02.279 --> 00:31:09.839
Competition isn't necessarily going to yield only things that we esthetically, morally,
547
00:31:09.960 --> 00:31:14.279
or otherwise think is good. That's not necessarily what competition does.
548
00:31:14.319 --> 00:31:17.799
And I don't know why we would believe that so, Right, Competition,
549
00:31:17.920 --> 00:31:22.839
for example, may yield to or may yield like effects
550
00:31:22.880 --> 00:31:24.480
of business that.
551
00:31:24.519 --> 00:31:25.880
Are socially negative.
552
00:31:25.960 --> 00:31:28.599
Right, And so that's why we have regulations to deal
553
00:31:28.640 --> 00:31:32.519
with these things. Part of what competition enforcers should do
554
00:31:33.559 --> 00:31:36.759
is think about the competition part and so like, even
555
00:31:36.920 --> 00:31:43.119
if a deal were bad for Actually, i'll give you
556
00:31:43.119
--> 00:31:48.039
an example of this. We had a case involving the
557
00:31:48.200 --> 00:31:52.119
merger of two coal mines in the Southern Powder River
558
00:31:52.240 --> 00:31:55.839
basin in Wyoming. It's kind of a special kind of coal.
559
00:31:56.480 --> 00:31:59.720
One of the arguments against liability, which all the commissioners
560
00:31:59.720 --> 00:32:03.880
agreed upon, Democratic and Republican alike, was the notion that
561
00:32:04.039 --> 00:32:08.960
it doesn't really matter what happens in coal, because over
562
00:32:09.039 --> 00:32:12.680
time we're still moving to natural gas fired plants.
563
00:32:12.759 --> 00:32:12.880
Right.
564
00:32:12.920 --> 00:32:15.279
That's how we're going to produce more energy, and coal
565
00:32:15.359 --> 00:32:18.759
is sort of on the way. But another argument is that, like,
566
00:32:19.799 --> 00:32:22.440
maybe we don't want more coal production, and the benefit
567
00:32:22.480 --> 00:32:25.440
of a monopoly would be the reduction and output. But
568
00:32:25.480 --> 00:32:29.319
as a competition enforcer, that's not your job. And I
569
00:32:29.359 --> 00:32:32.839
do think like, nowhere in the history of the FTC Act,
570
00:32:33.519 --> 00:32:37.359
nowhere in the text, nowhere in the legislative history is
571
00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:40.519
this notion that the FTC commissioners are supposed to be
572
00:32:41.000 --> 00:32:45.000
moral determinants. Like I think that business is bad. I
573
00:32:45.039 --> 00:32:47.759
think that business is good. And I think that distinction
574
00:32:48.359 --> 00:32:51.880
right between what a competitive economy yields and what our
575
00:32:51.960 --> 00:32:54.759
vision of a moral economy might yield is important to understand.
576
00:32:54.799 --> 00:32:57.039
I'm not disagreeing you on the substance of what you're saying.
577
00:32:58.039 --> 00:33:02.200
You know, the competition isn't isn't necessarily a moral morally
578
00:33:02.240 --> 00:33:06.519
virtuous or you know, and and the FTC can.
579
00:33:07.200 --> 00:33:07.720
That it is.
580
00:33:07.759 --> 00:33:10.519
But yeah, it depends how you define it.
581
00:33:10.559 --> 00:33:12.079
I think that's a really core point.
582
00:33:12.119 --> 00:33:15.720
But Bork defined corpetition competition in a very different way
583
00:33:15.839 --> 00:33:16.160
than I.
584
00:33:16.079 --> 00:33:17.079
Think Brandeis would have.
585
00:33:17.599 --> 00:33:19.240
But I guess, you know, you just said that there's
586
00:33:19.279 --> 00:33:21.799
no moral there's nothing in the statutes of the FTC
587
00:33:22.000 --> 00:33:25.079
that has any moral valance, that has any that has any.
588
00:33:24.920 --> 00:33:26.039
Sort of moral statement.
589
00:33:27.160 --> 00:33:29.440
I mean, I don't know. We're talking about Section five.
590
00:33:29.519 --> 00:33:33.799
You know, unfair methods of competition. Unfair is a very clear,
591
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:38.119
morally freighted word, and you also have unfair methods or
592
00:33:38.240 --> 00:33:41.200
unfair and deceptive practices another so.
593
00:33:41.559 --> 00:33:43.160
Very moral term. I mean you can't.
594
00:33:43.200 --> 00:33:45.400
I mean, like, obviously, you know liquor needs to be
595
00:33:45.440 --> 00:33:47.720
regulated in different there's a lots of different parts of communists.
596
00:33:47.720 --> 00:33:50.440
There's a reason, there's a lot of different bodies of law.
597
00:33:50.480 --> 00:33:53.920
But to say that there's no moral element to the FTC,
598
00:33:54.039 --> 00:33:56.079
it's just it's like, where why is the set you've
599
00:33:56.119 --> 00:33:57.039
written to say unfair?
600
00:33:57.440 --> 00:33:59.839
What I'm saying is that it doesn't give the commission
601
00:34:00.240 --> 00:34:04.160
license or law enforcement license to decide which things in
602
00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:07.039
the economy that's But that's not That's not what you
603
00:34:07.119 --> 00:34:07.599
said though.
604
00:34:08.159 --> 00:34:10.400
That what you said is there's nothing in the in
605
00:34:10.440 --> 00:34:13.519
the statue that says the FTC commissioners are general moral
606
00:34:13.639 --> 00:34:15.199
arbiters for the economy.
607
00:34:14.599 --> 00:34:17.840
Well, I yes, unfair methods of competition, that's what the
608
00:34:17.880 --> 00:34:20.119
statute says. But let me ask you this Matt, do
609
00:34:20.159 --> 00:34:24.519
you think right unfair methods of competition would enable the
610
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:28.719
FTC to bless price fixing in like alcohol or gambling. No,
611
00:34:28.760 --> 00:34:31.840
of course, and reduce reduce the output of something that
612
00:34:31.920 --> 00:34:33.719
was morally of course not.
613
00:34:33.840 --> 00:34:36.960
Well, I'm not I'm not saying that the FTC is
614
00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:39.920
the moral arbiter of our society, and I don't think
615
00:34:39.960 --> 00:34:44.280
anybody would claim that. But we have a whole set
616
00:34:44.320 --> 00:34:48.199
of governing institutions. We have a whole set of civil institutions,
617
00:34:48.440 --> 00:34:51.079
we have a whole set of religious institutions, and all
618
00:34:51.119 --> 00:34:53.440
of these have a place in governing the.
619
00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:54.719
Morals of our society.
620
00:34:55.440 --> 00:34:58.840
The FTC doesn't have doesn't shouldn't tell you who to worship,
621
00:34:58.840 --> 00:35:02.039
and shouldn't tell you also you know whether an industry
622
00:35:02.119 --> 00:35:06.639
is good or bad. However, there is very clearly a
623
00:35:06.800 --> 00:35:10.599
moral lens that the FTC has to look at competition policy,
624
00:35:10.639 --> 00:35:15.320
which is why they wrote unfairness into the statute in
625
00:35:15.440 --> 00:35:18.559
multiple ways, and why there's such debate over unfairness, and
626
00:35:18.599 --> 00:35:22.719
why Josh Wright in twenty fifteen and Edith Ramirez tried
627
00:35:22.760 --> 00:35:26.639
to get rid of it through administrative FIA. You can't
628
00:35:26.719 --> 00:35:30.400
avoid the fact that morality is part of commerce. That's
629
00:35:30.440 --> 00:35:33.239
why people are so angry at being nickel and dimed
630
00:35:33.280 --> 00:35:35.280
even when they can afford it, because we don't like
631
00:35:35.320 --> 00:35:35.880
being cheated.
632
00:35:36.599 --> 00:35:39.519
So I want to speak to that. Even deception is
633
00:35:39.519 --> 00:35:42.559
a moral term. One of the things that the policy
634
00:35:42.679 --> 00:35:50.000
statement did right was take out of antitrust for purposes
635
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:52.840
of section five, what we call the rule of reason.
636
00:35:53.360 --> 00:35:53.519
Right.
637
00:35:54.000 --> 00:35:56.519
It enabled the agency to create Sorry, this is like
638
00:35:56.559 --> 00:35:59.960
anti trust chargon. There's like two big buckets. There's person
639
00:36:00.639 --> 00:36:04.719
price fixing, market division. These things are obviously and clearly bad,
640
00:36:04.719 --> 00:36:06.360
and we don't need to ask a lot of questions
641
00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:09.880
about them. Sometimes even criminal liability can be assigned to them.
642
00:36:10.199 --> 00:36:12.599
And then there's the rest. And that's the rule of reason.
643
00:36:12.880 --> 00:36:15.360
And the general trend of the case law over many
644
00:36:15.400 --> 00:36:19.440
many decades has been toward the rule of reason. The premise,
645
00:36:19.760 --> 00:36:23.559
the idea behind the Section five policy statement is that
646
00:36:23.639 --> 00:36:28.679
the FTC can condemn things even though they would pass
647
00:36:28.800 --> 00:36:31.039
muster under the rule of reason. And the theory of
648
00:36:31.079 --> 00:36:34.480
the thing is that Congress in nineteen fourteen, when it
649
00:36:34.599 --> 00:36:38.159
passed the FTC Act, looked at the Standard Oil decision
650
00:36:38.159 --> 00:36:42.280
from nineteen eleven, which articulated a version of the rule
651
00:36:42.280 --> 00:36:46.280
of reason and rejected it. And so the FTC in
652
00:36:46.840 --> 00:36:50.440
what was it twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four, twenty
653
00:36:50.480 --> 00:36:53.719
twenty two, said to itself, great, I don't need to
654
00:36:53.760 --> 00:36:55.599
do all the things that the rule of reason requires.
655
00:36:55.639 --> 00:36:57.519
So what the rule of reason in some and substance
656
00:36:57.559 --> 00:37:00.480
requires is that you do a careful examination of the
657
00:37:00.519 --> 00:37:03.199
markets at issue and the conducted issue and what effect
658
00:37:03.559 --> 00:37:08.440
in those markets that conduct hask. It is not true
659
00:37:09.039 --> 00:37:12.440
that the FTC Act categorically rejected the rules of reason.
660
00:37:12.800 --> 00:37:15.400
It's answer to what the courts were doing and the
661
00:37:15.519 --> 00:37:18.440
legislators were annoyed that the courts seemed to be taking
662
00:37:18.480 --> 00:37:22.480
power over things was a structural Sorry, that's the wrong word.
663
00:37:22.519 --> 00:37:27.079
It was an institutional response instead of doing just court
664
00:37:27.360 --> 00:37:31.199
mediated antitrust. We're going to have two other selves. One
665
00:37:31.239 --> 00:37:34.400
is congressional and one is through an expert agency. The
666
00:37:34.400 --> 00:37:39.639
congressional response was the Clayton Act that actually came just
667
00:37:39.719 --> 00:37:42.519
before and the Clayton Act is a series of more
668
00:37:42.920 --> 00:37:47.519
specific things that are condemnable under the antitrust laws as
669
00:37:47.559 --> 00:37:49.880
opposed to the Sherman Act, which is written in very
670
00:37:50.039 --> 00:37:54.280
very broad terms. And the second response is institutional. They
671
00:37:54.280 --> 00:37:57.199
create an agency in theory and expert agency, and that's
672
00:37:57.239 --> 00:38:00.880
the FTC. And so the difference is less like the
673
00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:04.719
substantive liability. It's more in the process for getting out
674
00:38:04.719 --> 00:38:06.960
of it. One is a congressional response and one is
675
00:38:07.000 --> 00:38:10.440
having an agency to do it. And yes, like the
676
00:38:10.519 --> 00:38:12.960
wordfare is a little bit different, and we recognize it
677
00:38:13.000 --> 00:38:15.960
to be a little different than we do restraints of
678
00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:20.800
trade under the Sherman Act, but it's also not true
679
00:38:20.800 --> 00:38:23.039
that we've ever viewed it, I mean, other than this
680
00:38:23.079 --> 00:38:26.639
one policy statement as a general rip for that agency
681
00:38:26.840 --> 00:38:28.079
to condemn whatever it wants.
682
00:38:29.119 --> 00:38:33.679
Okay, So I guess I want to get pull out
683
00:38:33.719 --> 00:38:37.239
of the sort of details of the law because I
684
00:38:37.280 --> 00:38:40.320
think it's missing, the conversation is missing a sort of
685
00:38:40.360 --> 00:38:46.000
perspective of just ordinary people's experience of the economy, why
686
00:38:46.039 --> 00:38:50.199
they're so angry about what's happening right now. So I'll
687
00:38:50.280 --> 00:38:52.440
just note there's this quote that always sticks with me,
688
00:38:53.039 --> 00:38:55.719
which is a small business person who sold auto parts,
689
00:38:56.039 --> 00:39:00.119
and it was in twenty nineteen, and he said, the
690
00:39:00.440 --> 00:39:04.719
government can harass me and find me, but Google can
691
00:39:04.719 --> 00:39:07.920
make me homeless because Google, could you know, with its
692
00:39:07.920 --> 00:39:11.320
algorithm not intentional, just took him out of Google Maps,
693
00:39:12.159 --> 00:39:14.880
and I think, what, I hear this all the time
694
00:39:15.199 --> 00:39:17.320
across lots of different areas of our economy.
695
00:39:17.360 --> 00:39:18.800
It's not just big
tech. Today.
696
00:39:18.800 --> 00:39:20.239
I got an email or yesterday I got an email
697
00:39:20.280 --> 00:39:22.320
from somebody who does his state sales. There's like an
698
00:39:22.440 --> 00:39:26.280
estate sale portal monopoly. I hear it from people who buy.
699
00:39:27.599 --> 00:39:29.079
What's it called the.
700
00:39:28.760 --> 00:39:31.159
Office for coolers of water, Like there's just been a
701
00:39:31.239 --> 00:39:32.320
roll up into a monopoly.
702
00:39:32.400 --> 00:39:32.679
There.
703
00:39:33.000 --> 00:39:35.719
Hear it just kind of in all parts of the economy.
704
00:39:35.880 --> 00:39:40.840
There is fear. There is fear, and you saw it
705
00:39:40.880 --> 00:39:43.320
in the conservative space a few years ago when these
706
00:39:43.320 --> 00:39:46.880
companies were banning conservative speakers.
707
00:39:47.880 --> 00:39:48.440
That fear.
708
00:39:48.639 --> 00:39:52.519
You felt that that is what every American feels about
709
00:39:52.559 --> 00:39:56.400
the private coercive entities that have been allowed to emerge
710
00:39:56.800 --> 00:39:58.239
because of the Bork Framework.
711
00:39:59.079 --> 00:40:01.639
And there is a choice here about what to do
712
00:40:01.719 --> 00:40:02.199
about that.
713
00:40:02.599 --> 00:40:06.960
Are we going to have a country where life, liberty,
714
00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:10.079
and the pursuit of happiness are available to all of us,
715
00:40:10.440 --> 00:40:13.599
or are we going to continue down this road to
716
00:40:13.679 --> 00:40:16.280
surf them. And that is the choice, and that is
717
00:40:16.280 --> 00:40:18.519
the choice that we have to make as a society,
718
00:40:18.880 --> 00:40:21.599
as political actors as well. And that's the fight that
719
00:40:21.679 --> 00:40:24.360
I think is happening within the Trump administration. It's happening
720
00:40:24.360 --> 00:40:26.119
on the democratic side of the aisle, it's happening in
721
00:40:26.199 --> 00:40:28.840
rooms like this, and it's also happening in conversations over
722
00:40:28.840 --> 00:40:29.719
things like the Federal Reserve.
723
00:40:29.920 --> 00:40:32.039
And I just want to want to center this.
724
00:40:32.239 --> 00:40:35.559
In this really fundamental moral and political question that does
725
00:40:35.599 --> 00:40:37.960
go back to the English Civil.
726
00:40:37.679 --> 00:40:41.840
War and Levelers and all the rest of that. So anyway,
727
00:40:42.119 --> 00:40:42.639
all right.
728
00:40:42.559 --> 00:40:47.199
I want to take a slight turn up direction here.
729
00:40:47.800 --> 00:40:51.519
Can the two of you agree that weaponization of ani
730
00:40:51.599 --> 00:40:58.599
trust is and should be a concern and a bipartisan concern. Yeah, yeah, okay,
731
00:40:59.079 --> 00:41:03.360
So engining the consumer welfare standard, the Bork approach with
732
00:41:03.480 --> 00:41:07.840
you as you've broadly described it, for some more subjective
733
00:41:08.679 --> 00:41:13.400
criteria such as fairness, just increase the potential to weaponize
734
00:41:13.519 --> 00:41:14.719
kind of trust enforcement.
735
00:41:15.239 --> 00:41:17.519
So there's no such thing as the consumer welfare standard,
736
00:41:17.639 --> 00:41:18.079
you can.
737
00:41:18.360 --> 00:41:23.239
You know, when I first started looking at antitrust in well,
738
00:41:23.280 --> 00:41:27.360
I was a young man. Then the consumer welfare standard
739
00:41:27.440 --> 00:41:30.199
was about short term price effects. Bork wrote about it
740
00:41:30.239 --> 00:41:35.440
as as price theory, and then people started saying, well,
741
00:41:35.719 --> 00:41:38.840
but how did you allow Google to get so big?
742
00:41:38.880 --> 00:41:41.960
How why are their monopolies everywhere. This seems like it's
743
00:41:42.000 --> 00:41:45.079
not really helping. And also consumers aren't doing so well,
744
00:41:45.599 --> 00:41:48.320
and oh, we can change the consumer.
745
00:41:48.360 --> 00:41:48.559
We can.
746
00:41:48.599 --> 00:41:51.239
We can incorporate innovation, we can incorporate quality. Oh, we
747
00:41:51.280 --> 00:41:54.280
can incorporate labor. We can totally you know, change the
748
00:41:54.320 --> 00:41:58.159
standard to match every you know, to match like new
749
00:41:58.199 --> 00:41:58.760
needs and stuff.
750
00:41:58.760 --> 00:42:00.760
And then you're just not good about standard.
751
00:42:00.760 --> 00:42:04.800
You're just like, it's just you just substituted on fairness
752
00:42:04.920 --> 00:42:08.239
or you know, the monopolization attempt to anoplish all these
753
00:42:08.280 --> 00:42:10.639
laws that are words that are in statute with a
754
00:42:10.639 --> 00:42:13.400
different set of words that are not in statute and
755
00:42:13.639 --> 00:42:15.519
are just tweaking, you know, just changing.
756
00:42:15.280 --> 00:42:17.199
Fairness is your word if we use fair enough.
757
00:42:17.440 --> 00:42:19.760
Fairness is not my word on fairness is in Section
758
00:42:19.800 --> 00:42:21.079
five fair.
759
00:42:20.960 --> 00:42:23.159
Enough, but the one you would like to say emphasized
760
00:42:23.239 --> 00:42:23.960
more than it is.
761
00:42:24.039 --> 00:42:26.119
I'm not saying it needs to be emphasized more than
762
00:42:26.159 --> 00:42:28.119
it is. What I'm saying is it's there. I'm saying
763
00:42:28.119 --> 00:42:31.599
it's there. My issue is simply that I don't think
764
00:42:31.599 --> 00:42:34.719
that the conservative that the I mean, the conservative legal
765
00:42:34.719 --> 00:42:37.239
movement is heteronoxi as many different ports. But I think
766
00:42:37.280 --> 00:42:42.599
that the technocratic frame that came out of Stigler and
767
00:42:42.679 --> 00:42:47.320
Borg and Friedman just wholesale rejected the American tradition. And
768
00:42:47.360 --> 00:42:50.119
the American tradition is in a whole series of words
769
00:42:50.119 --> 00:42:53.199
that are put there in
statute by Congress that have
770
00:42:53.280 --> 00:42:56.679
common law meetings, meanings that go back to the Middle Ages.
771
00:42:56.800 --> 00:42:59.239
And they just said, nah, that's not there. And I
772
00:42:59.840 --> 00:43:03.000
think that's not a legitimate way to analyze law. And
773
00:43:03.039 --> 00:43:05.679
I think it has put us into a system of
774
00:43:05.840 --> 00:43:09.000
deep arbitrary coercion. And if we don't deal with it,
775
00:43:09.280 --> 00:43:11.599
they're going to come for you. That's the thing, is like,
776
00:43:11.679 --> 00:43:15.320
if we don't deal with this problem, you're in the crosshairs.
777
00:43:15.599 --> 00:43:19.679
So a system of arbitrary coercion where that is legal,
778
00:43:20.039 --> 00:43:22.480
is terrifying. And that is what Americans are experiencing in
779
00:43:22.480 --> 00:43:26.679
the commercial sector. It's what they've been experiencing for probably
780
00:43:26.719 --> 00:43:29.320
twenty thirty years, and that's coming for all of us
781
00:43:29.320 --> 00:43:30.440
if we don't put a stop to it.
782
00:43:31.039 --> 00:43:34.800
Okay, a few points. I think the first thing is.
783
00:43:36.280 --> 00:43:38.480
When you talk about putting a stop to it, I
784
00:43:38.519 --> 00:43:41.159
think what you mean is government power.
785
00:43:42.559 --> 00:43:43.920
No, I don't what is the.
786
00:43:45.559 --> 00:43:48.039
I think a lot well, we can hold. I want
787
00:43:48.039 --> 00:43:51.960
to hit a point here. You Mann specifically mentioned the
788
00:43:52.000 --> 00:43:56.599
concerns that conservatives had about being deep platform and being censored.
789
00:43:56.840 --> 00:44:00.280
You also criticized, right, the case that the FTC the
790
00:44:00.280 --> 00:44:05.239
merger enforcement action in ipg Omnicon, and there's an interesting
791
00:44:05.320 --> 00:44:08.320
tension there. But I think the thing I want to
792
00:44:08.360 --> 00:44:10.239
say one thing for the audience to understand. Because we
793
00:44:10.280 --> 00:44:14.480
throw around these terms like consumer welfare, throw around other
794
00:44:14.559 --> 00:44:18.880
terms as well. One of the big differences right that
795
00:44:18.880 --> 00:44:21.639
that kind of frame of thinking makes is the following.
796
00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:25.400
There are things you can do in commerce that will
797
00:44:25.440 --> 00:44:31.480
disadvantage smaller competitors but also benefit consumers. And the classic
798
00:44:31.519 --> 00:44:35.159
example of this is you take advantage of economy of scale,
799
00:44:35.559 --> 00:44:39.480
meaning you're a bigger company and so you can do
800
00:44:39.559 --> 00:44:42.119
things more cheeky. You have fewer lawyers that you need
801
00:44:42.159 --> 00:44:45.760
to advise you maybe you can secure better contracts with
802
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:48.960
suppliers because you're willing to buy more of what they're
803
00:44:49.000 --> 00:44:54.280
selling and thus
turn those price decreases for yourself into
804
00:44:54.360 --> 00:44:58.280
lower prices for consumers. That has been the predominant framing.
805
00:44:58.400 --> 00:45:01.639
Understanding that that is consistent with competition has been the
806
00:45:01.679 --> 00:45:05.400
predominant training for decades it's something you object to. It's
807
00:45:05.440 --> 00:45:08.960
fair to have a debate. I think about the costs
808
00:45:08.960 --> 00:45:10.800
and the benefits of this conduct. But one of the
809
00:45:10.800 --> 00:45:12.719
things that needs to be part of that debate is
810
00:45:12.760 --> 00:45:15.719
part of what we're talking about are lower prices. And
811
00:45:15.840 --> 00:45:19.000
lower prices are something that people care very very much about.
812
00:45:19.159 --> 00:45:22.719
When we began to see inflation tick up just a bit,
813
00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:26.760
people really really got upset, and it had political ramifications,
814
00:45:26.920 --> 00:45:28.519
and that is totally understandable.
815
00:45:29.000 --> 00:45:29.559
It is not.
816
00:45:29.719 --> 00:45:33.239
Simply a question of whether a firm is large. The
817
00:45:33.360 --> 00:45:36.239
question and this is also true under the case law right,
818
00:45:36.320 --> 00:45:41.119
this is true under many many Supreme Court precedents. The
819
00:45:41.199 --> 00:45:43.960
question is not just your size, but what you are
820
00:45:44.039 --> 00:45:46.679
doing with that size. And if you have a rule
821
00:45:47.079 --> 00:45:50.719
that says it is illegal to succeed, if you have
822
00:45:50.760 --> 00:45:54.440
a rule that says it is illegal legitimately to attain monopoly,
823
00:45:54.480 --> 00:45:57.239
which is not the rule, sorry, which is not the rule,
824
00:45:57.920 --> 00:45:59.960
then what you will do is you will discourage things
825
00:46:00.079 --> 00:46:02.840
that are popular with consumers. You will discourage low prices.
826
00:46:02.920 --> 00:46:06.079
And your Robinson patent case is interesting, but the following reason.
827
00:46:07.079 --> 00:46:08.800
One of the things that the FTC did in this
828
00:46:08.880 --> 00:46:11.599
policy statement that I keep talking about is they said
829
00:46:11.599 --> 00:46:16.199
they could color a margin not only around the Sherman Act,
830
00:46:16.599 --> 00:46:19.480
which was the antecedent law when the FTC Act was passed,
831
00:46:19.920 --> 00:46:23.079
but also around the Robinson Patent acting. What Robinson Patent
832
00:46:23.119 --> 00:46:27.639
does is it bars certain kinds of discrimination and pricing
833
00:46:27.960 --> 00:46:31.679
that ultimately translate into certain kinds of discounting.
834
00:46:32.000 --> 00:46:33.840
So what the FTC was doing was they were.
835
00:46:33.719 --> 00:46:37.480
Saying, not only do you have to follow the statute
836
00:46:37.480 --> 00:46:40.480
and the case law on Robinson Patent, but also there
837
00:46:40.519 --> 00:46:43.280
are other discounts that we can condemn, but we're not
838
00:46:43.360 --> 00:46:45.440
going to tell you what those are. And what that
839
00:46:45.480 --> 00:46:48.639
means as a practical matter is that companies have to
840
00:46:48.679 --> 00:46:51.559
think twice before lowering their prices, and that is not
841
00:46:51.719 --> 00:46:54.559
good for consumers. And that is important.
842
00:46:54.840 --> 00:46:59.039
And I don't think Americans are happier with higher prices. Okay,
843
00:46:59.599 --> 00:47:01.000
I I think we can.
844
00:47:02.159 --> 00:47:05.519
I guess I started by talking about Microsoft Activision and
845
00:47:05.559 --> 00:47:08.719
the dramatic price hike that took place over a game pass.
846
00:47:09.280 --> 00:47:11.559
I mean there is a sort of speculative, an unwieldy,
847
00:47:11.840 --> 00:47:15.320
silly theoretical model in which you have to consolidate everything
848
00:47:15.320 --> 00:47:17.719
in order to lower prices. But I think people who
849
00:47:17.760 --> 00:47:20.639
live in the real world know that when companies get bigger,
850
00:47:20.719 --> 00:47:23.639
they don't get more efficient and they don't lower prices.
851
00:47:24.119 --> 00:47:27.920
And I think you can see that we have just
852
00:47:28.039 --> 00:47:32.599
macro economists. Look at the high persistent rate of profit
853
00:47:32.760 --> 00:47:35.079
in the US, which is relatively new. This is not
854
00:47:35.280 --> 00:47:37.760
something that America used to be a low profit, high
855
00:47:37.800 --> 00:47:41.960
productivity economy, and we're moving towards a high profit less
856
00:47:42.679 --> 00:47:47.039
sort of less productivity economy. Our companies are older, bigger,
857
00:47:47.360 --> 00:47:51.000
and more profitable than they've ever been. You just talk
858
00:47:51.039 --> 00:47:53.599
to any private equity guys, and they're looking for places
859
00:47:53.599 --> 00:47:55.519
that they can invest that have pricing power. Like, they're
860
00:47:55.559 --> 00:47:57.639
not trying to make things more efficient so they can
861
00:47:57.639 --> 00:48:00.199
deliver more to consumers. That's just like one of these
862
00:48:00.400 --> 00:48:02.360
silly models. And I think if you just talk, if
863
00:48:02.400 --> 00:48:04.400
you just do any polling, you'll find that most people
864
00:48:04.440 --> 00:48:07.639
are like, yeah, that's that's that's absurd. You've seen in
865
00:48:07.639 --> 00:48:10.559
a tremendous collapse of faith in big business and faith.
866
00:48:10.599 --> 00:48:13.079
One of the only institutions in America that it has
867
00:48:13.239 --> 00:48:15.360
the people like is small business. And there's a reason
868
00:48:15.400 --> 00:48:17.079
for that. And you can say, oh, that's fake. And
869
00:48:17.119 --> 00:48:20.320
my theoretical model of the world. That's actually what's going on,
870
00:48:20.400 --> 00:48:22.760
but the public is just not there anymore.
871
00:48:24.280 -->
00:48:27.400
People say that that's survey evidence. Let's say, okay, what
872
00:48:27.519 --> 00:48:30.000
did they do? They go to Walmart? They don't go
873
00:48:30.039 --> 00:48:33.760
to the local grocer of those small main street stores, right.
874
00:48:34.039 --> 00:48:35.920
Well, but that that I buy off of Amazon.
875
00:48:36.000 --> 00:48:39.199
I mean, the point of a monopoly is that they have,
876
00:48:40.000 --> 00:48:43.239
you know, is that that a monopoly makes it impossible
877
00:48:43.320 --> 00:48:46.000
not to do business with them. I mean, it's so
878
00:48:46.159 --> 00:48:48.239
one of so one of the the Amazon case of
879
00:48:48.239 --> 00:48:53.480
those no hey, when I'm talking time, so Amazon, for example,
880
00:48:53.559 --> 00:48:56.119
the anti trust case against Amazon from the FTC says
881
00:48:56.480 --> 00:49:01.039
that Amazon is artificially is tell companies that if they
882
00:49:01.159 --> 00:49:04.360
they're so big as an online seller, that if you
883
00:49:04.400 --> 00:49:07.719
want to sell through Amazon, you can't sell your products
884
00:49:07.840 --> 00:49:08.880
lower anywhere else.
885
00:49:09.199 --> 00:49:11.079
So Amazon looks like it has.
886
00:49:10.920 --> 00:49:13.320
The cheapest prices, but that's only because they're so powerful
887
00:49:13.360 --> 00:49:16.920
they can raise prices everywhere else in the economy. So
888
00:49:17.480 --> 00:49:20.440
I don't know, I think just this this notion that
889
00:49:20.840 --> 00:49:23.239
you know, these these companies are passing on lower prices,
890
00:49:23.239 --> 00:49:25.440
it just doesn't it's just not consistent.
891
00:49:25.000 --> 00:49:26.559
With with with what's happening.
892
00:49:27.039 --> 00:49:29.880
And if I'm not going to buy something it's more
893
00:49:29.880 --> 00:49:33.719
expensive on some thirty party site for some moral reason,
894
00:49:33.760 --> 00:49:35.920
I'm going to I'm going to buy it where it's cheapest.
895
00:49:36.280 --> 00:49:39.199
And if Amazon has the raw market power and the
896
00:49:39.239 --> 00:49:42.039
ability to coerce everyone else into raising their prices so
897
00:49:42.119 --> 00:49:46.239
that they can get massive fees, well that's a huge
898
00:49:46.239 --> 00:49:48.239
problem for the economy. But it's not something that you
899
00:49:48.280 --> 00:49:52.960
can solve with individual consumer behavior anymore that you can solve,
900
00:49:53.159 --> 00:49:56.760
you know, the any boycotts that have happened in our
901
00:49:56.840 --> 00:50:00.519
society without the follow on political action to address them.
902
00:50:00.960 --> 00:50:02.159
So I asked you about Walmart.
903
00:50:02.159 --> 00:50:06.360
You're answered with Amazon, Well about Walmart's larger.
904
00:50:06.199 --> 00:50:06.559
Isn't it?
905
00:50:07.079 --> 00:50:10.760
I think Amazon just passed. But they're similar, roughly similar.
906
00:50:10.840 --> 00:50:12.920
I mean Walmart is a good example. Like so the
907
00:50:13.239 --> 00:50:16.519
Walmart Pepsi case, well it was a Pepsi case, but
908
00:50:16.719 --> 00:50:19.960
you know it was redacted. They were like a company
909
00:50:19.960 --> 00:50:24.000
that rhymes with Smalmart, and so it was Pepsi sells
910
00:50:24.000 --> 00:50:24.800
its stuff to.
911
00:50:24.840 --> 00:50:27.360
Walmart for lower prices. And this is consistent.
912
00:50:27.480 --> 00:50:30.800
So you know, there was a private, you know, robson
913
00:50:30.840 --> 00:50:33.639
patent case where you know, a bag of Frito's or
914
00:50:33.639 --> 00:50:35.440
a bag of Drido something like that, which is owned
915
00:50:35.480 --> 00:50:38.039
by Pepsi. They sell it to a small grocer at
916
00:50:38.079 --> 00:50:40.719
five bucks, they sell it to, you know, a big
917
00:50:40.760 --> 00:50:43.119
grocer like a Kroger at two bucks. I'm just making
918
00:50:43.159 --> 00:50:44.960
up the numbers, but that's the gist of it. And
919
00:50:45.000 --> 00:50:47.480
it's like, that's not there's nothing more efficient about that.
920
00:50:47.480 --> 00:50:48.719
That's just raw bargaining power.
921
00:50:48.760 --> 00:50:49.880
And we have a law. We actually have.
922
00:50:49.880 --> 00:50:51.440
The Clayton Neck was passed to deal with that, but
923
00:50:51.480 --> 00:50:53.719
that didn't really work, and so Congress passed Robinson Pattan
924
00:50:53.800 --> 00:50:56.239
to deal with it, and for about forty years that
925
00:50:56.280 --> 00:50:58.079
worked until we stopped enforcing it.
926
00:50:58.119 --> 00:51:00.320
So the reason that you shop at Walmart is.
927
00:51:00.280 --> 00:51:04.400
Because Walmart has the bargaining power to tell all of
928
00:51:04.440 --> 00:51:06.920
these dominant firms that they need to get better prices,
929
00:51:06.960 --> 00:51:08.960
even though that's against the law. It's against the law
930
00:51:09.000 --> 00:51:11.239
that we haven't enforced for four years. You can't put
931
00:51:11.280 --> 00:51:12.079
that on the consumer.
932
00:51:12.199 --> 00:51:14.400
And then it turns out that Kroger and Albertson and
933
00:51:14.440 --> 00:51:16.199
all the others also have low prices.
934
00:51:16.320 --> 00:51:20.280
Well, Kroger and Albertson's not all the others. Those are
935
00:51:20.840 --> 00:51:23.559
the third biggest supermarket change in the country.
936
00:51:24.320 --> 00:51:25.920
And yeah, it's law.
937
00:51:25.960 --> 00:51:28.679
It's funny because when Albertson's executive went on the stand
938
00:51:29.119 --> 00:51:31.840
during the merger case between Kroger and Albertsons and said, look,
939
00:51:31.880 --> 00:51:34.400
we're getting killed by Walmart because we can't get good
940
00:51:34.480 --> 00:51:37.000
enough prices. And this is a twenty four billion dollar company.
941
00:51:37.039 --> 00:51:41.400
So look, if you want consolidation and arbitrary coercion, then
942
00:51:41.400 --> 00:51:44.400
you should allow for systemic
price discrimination. But if you
943
00:51:44.440 --> 00:51:46.559
want to follow the law, then you should And you
944
00:51:46.599 --> 00:51:50.159
want a free economy and bear markets, reasonable markets, actually
945
00:51:50.199 --> 00:51:53.000
open markets, then you know, at lower prices, then you
946
00:51:53.039 --> 00:51:55.119
would actually enforce the laws. And it worked, and when
947
00:51:55.159 --> 00:51:57.519
we stopped enforcing the laws, we have this society that's
948
00:51:57.559 --> 00:51:58.280
just gone crazy.
949
00:51:58.559 --> 00:52:03.840
So Walmart's an interesting example here because I think the
950
00:52:03.840 --> 00:52:08.400
notion that Walmart is arbitrarily coercing consumers doesn't make a
951
00:52:08.400 --> 00:52:10.679
lot of sense. You have a claim that they are
952
00:52:11.079 --> 00:52:15.679
coercing low prices from their suppliers, right, what are they
953
00:52:15.679 --> 00:52:18.360
doing with those lower prices? They are definitely translating it
954
00:52:18.400 --> 00:52:21.760
into low price for consumers. That's why people shop at Walmart,
955
00:52:21.920 --> 00:52:24.840
and those people like the same people. I think we
956
00:52:24.880 --> 00:52:27.280
all want to protect. I think those interests need to
957
00:52:27.320 --> 00:52:30.360
be taken into account, people really don't like to pay
958
00:52:30.360 --> 00:52:32.559
more than they have to for the products that they
959
00:52:32.559 --> 00:52:33.280
want access to.
960
00:52:33.519 --> 00:52:36.639
The notion that you are arbitrarily coerced to go to Walmart,
961
00:52:36.719 --> 00:52:38.320
I just don't think that Land.
962
00:52:38.519 --> 00:52:41.000
I am not talking just about consumers, although there have
963
00:52:41.039 --> 00:52:43.880
been serious deception cases against Walmart in a number of
964
00:52:43.880 --> 00:52:44.599
different areas.
965
00:52:45.039 --> 00:52:46.360
But let's just accept.
966
00:52:46.559 --> 00:52:48.519
I'll just accept for the state of their argument that
967
00:52:48.559 --> 00:52:54.119
Walmart offers low prices, they are coercing suppliers.
968
00:52:54.000 --> 00:52:55.599
Right, And I'll give you I'll give you an examples.
969
00:52:55.639 --> 00:52:56.840
The pepsi in your example.
970
00:52:56.960 --> 00:53:00.280
The victim here is Pepsi is so big that there's
971
00:53:00.639 --> 00:53:03.360
essentially an economy of golias. The victim here, and this
972
00:53:03.440 --> 00:53:06.199
is an example, would be a Snoop Dogg. He wanted
973
00:53:06.239 --> 00:53:08.880
to launch a cereal because he was like, look, I
974
00:53:09.320 --> 00:53:10.559
can launch a wave that's awesome.
975
00:53:10.800 --> 00:53:11.280
Yeah. Yeah.
976
00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:14.280
It was a sugar cereal targeted the black community because
977
00:53:14.280 --> 00:53:15.719
he's like, I can make sugar cereal as well as
978
00:53:15.719 --> 00:53:17.719
anyone else. And I wanted to make this a family business.
979
00:53:17.719 --> 00:53:20.800
And he went to Post, which and Post wanted to
980
00:53:20.800 --> 00:53:22.280
buy him out. He said, no, I want to keep
981
00:53:22.320 --> 00:53:26.079
this company in my family. And Post said sure, okay,
982
00:53:26.079 --> 00:53:30.199
we'll help you distribute it with Walmart, and then Post
983
00:53:30.320 --> 00:53:35.960
ended up not distributing it and you know, putting it
984
00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:39.960
in the back charging crazy prices. And Walmart was part
985
00:53:39.960 --> 00:53:43.880
of this too, because they wanted to prevent differentiated products
986
00:53:44.039 --> 00:53:45.920
from coming into the market. And that's why when you
987
00:53:45.960 --> 00:53:48.639
go into you know, and it's not just Walmart, but
988
00:53:48.679 --> 00:53:51.880
when you go into every like rest stop in America,
989
00:53:51.960 --> 00:53:55.119
which are consolidator, you go into like lots of different
990
00:53:55.119 --> 00:53:56.920
you know, there's seven eleven or lots of different stores.
991
00:53:57.000 --> 00:53:59.360
You see the same products everywhere in America.
992
00:53:59.400 --> 00:54:01.119
And he used to be you would go to a
993
00:54:01.159 --> 00:54:02.760
place that sells a lot of cherries, there would be
994
00:54:02.760 --> 00:54:04.880
a lot more cherry stuff. And you go into a
995
00:54:04.920 --> 00:54:06.320
place that has a lot of apples, you'd be a
996
00:54:06.320 --> 00:54:10.079
lot more apple stuff. We were regionally differentiated because people
997
00:54:10.079 --> 00:54:13.440
had the freedom to ply their trade. And now it's
998
00:54:13.480 --> 00:54:17.800
all just you know, gummy bears and the same you know,
999
00:54:17.880 --> 00:54:18.880
the same chocolates.
1000
00:54:19.000 --> 00:54:21.199
You took mister Beast tried to introduce chocolate. He said
1001
00:54:21.239 --> 00:54:21.639
it was a.
1002
00:54:21.719 --> 00:54:24.079
Nightmare to get into onto Walmart shelves. I mean, this
1003
00:54:24.239 --> 00:54:27.079
is an economy. We don't look at this as tyranny
1004
00:54:27.199 --> 00:54:29.280
because we divide up the world into the economics and
1005
00:54:29.320 --> 00:54:33.360
the political. But like, these are people's livelihoods. And mister
1006
00:54:33.400 --> 00:54:36.800
beast had trouble, if soup dog have trouble, what about
1007
00:54:36.800 --> 00:54:38.639
all the people that are not super famous and not
1008
00:54:38.719 --> 00:54:41.320
super wealthy, Like that's who I'm thinking about. And yet
1009
00:54:41.360 --> 00:54:44.239
it hurts consumers because if you look at Walmart, Walmart
1010
00:54:44.239 --> 00:54:47.159
goes into an area, it kills most of the of
1011
00:54:47.199 --> 00:54:49.679
the other grocers in the area, and obesity goes up
1012
00:54:49.840 --> 00:54:52.639
because people now are not able to get as many
1013
00:54:52.960 --> 00:54:55.320
fresh ingredients. This is alt a true more true with
1014
00:54:55.400 --> 00:54:58.320
dollar stores. There are all sorts of consequences here are
1015
00:54:58.360 --> 00:55:01.280
competing with Walmart, no off, and they will the dollar
1016
00:55:01.320 --> 00:55:03.760
store will come in when a Walmart has left, right,
1017
00:55:04.199 --> 00:55:04.960
This is like.
1018
00:55:07.440 --> 00:55:10.519
People are like, you find this all over the country.
1019
00:55:10.599 --> 00:55:11.760
This is not a partisan thing.
1020
00:55:12.159 --> 00:55:14.880
People are very upset when these big box stores come
1021
00:55:14.920 --> 00:55:18.199
to their town and get tax concessions and get infrastructure
1022
00:55:18.199 --> 00:55:21.760
concessions and then out compete their local guy who's actually
1023
00:55:21.800 --> 00:55:24.360
putting out the fresher stuff. It's why Iowa, which is
1024
00:55:24.400 --> 00:55:27.679
the best soil in the world, doesn't sell its own food.
1025
00:55:27.719 --> 00:55:29.360
They they if they.
1026
00:55:29.280 --> 00:55:32.920
Out compete and they win, and they offer people whatever
1027
00:55:32.960 --> 00:55:33.920
it is they want convenience.
1028
00:55:34.079 --> 00:55:37.039
Stop, that's a company you give me. It might be
1029
00:55:37.079 --> 00:55:38.800
a problem, but that's not a companution.
1030
00:55:39.039 --> 00:55:42.960
Give me a billion dollar tax concession and better prices
1031
00:55:43.079 --> 00:55:47.039
on every good that I on a wholesale level, and
1032
00:55:47.159 --> 00:55:49.800
I will outcompete you every time. And you can't tell
1033
00:55:49.840 --> 00:55:51.599
me that that is because I'm better at it.
1034
00:55:51.840 --> 00:55:55.039
I don't disagree with you that the government intervention in
1035
00:55:55.119 --> 00:55:56.920
markets can distort coming.
1036
00:55:56.719 --> 00:56:01.320
Say, government intervention where you did? Oh yeah, tax and sessions. Yeah,
1037
00:56:01.440 --> 00:56:04.679
so municipal Okay, so you know tax and sessions. Yes, Well,
1038
00:56:04.719 --> 00:56:06.920
I mean I'm just saying that that so we're talking
1039
00:56:06.960 --> 00:56:08.400
about pop This is the avantage.
1040
00:56:08.079 --> 00:56:09.159
Of being a lawyer. I could be like, well, I'm
1041
00:56:09.159 --> 00:56:12.599
not a lawyer. Uh, don't prove me wrong. That's awkward.
1042
00:56:15.360 --> 00:56:18.400
But the point is is that you know, you can
1043
00:56:18.639 --> 00:56:21.239
Most people don't see the law as like a set
1044
00:56:21.280 --> 00:56:24.880
of discreet silos. They see the society that's around them,
1045
00:56:24.960 --> 00:56:28.199
and they see no opportunities and they and and that
1046
00:56:28.360 --> 00:56:31.440
is because the political power that Walmart had when they
1047
00:56:31.480 --> 00:56:33.480
lobbied to drop the Robinson patent case.
1048
00:56:33.679 --> 00:56:35.639
And that is what happened, and we know.
1049
00:56:35.639 --> 00:56:39.159
That Walmart and Pepsi did it is the same political
1050
00:56:39.199 --> 00:56:42.800
power that they use to get those tax concessions and
1051
00:56:43.000 --> 00:56:45.559
destroy all of the local people who used to be
1052
00:56:45.639 --> 00:56:48.239
able to make a little something of theirselves, build a
1053
00:56:48.280 --> 00:56:49.239
community institution.
1054
00:56:49.800 --> 00:56:51.920
And now it's just it's just not that way in
1055
00:56:51.960 --> 00:56:53.599
America anymore. And you want to live in.
1056
00:56:53.559 --> 00:56:56.079
A society like that, you know, it's it's a society
1057
00:56:56.079 --> 00:56:59.000
where people are killing themselves, society where people are very,
1058
00:56:59.119 --> 00:57:01.639
very angry. And I'm just saying it's not just the
1059
00:57:01.639 --> 00:57:04.000
anti trust that's doing it. But you can't ignore the
1060
00:57:04.039 --> 00:57:07.199
consolidation of power and the coersion that goes along with it.
1061
00:57:07.559 --> 00:57:10.480
Nor frankly, can you ignore the fact that Trump is
1062
00:57:10.519 --> 00:57:13.679
fusing the state with that private coercion in a very
1063
00:57:13.760 --> 00:57:16.079
dangerous way that I think is going to come for
1064
00:57:16.159 --> 00:57:17.639
all of us if we don't stop it.
1065
00:57:17.679 --> 00:57:20.480
And that was that's not just a Republican thing.
1066
00:57:20.920 --> 00:57:22.519
That is a that is something that I think you
1067
00:57:22.519 --> 00:57:24.599
could see on the Democratic side as well with a
1068
00:57:24.639 --> 00:57:26.559
lot of speech. Some of the speech stuff I didn't
1069
00:57:26.599 --> 00:57:28.519
like what some of the Democrats were saying there. But
1070
00:57:28.559 --> 00:57:32.360
this is a consolidated economy, is a loaded gun. You're
1071
00:57:32.440 --> 00:57:35.159
leaving around for anyone to pick up and point it
1072
00:57:35.199 --> 00:57:39.039
at whole regions, at our ability to speak. And people
1073
00:57:39.079 --> 00:57:41.280
may not use that gun, or they may use it,
1074
00:57:41.360 --> 00:57:43.960
but it is a loaded gun. That is just a weapon,
1075
00:57:44.119 --> 00:57:46.199
and we have to get rid of that or else
1076
00:57:46.239 --> 00:57:47.760
we won't live in a free country anymore.
1077
00:57:47.760 --> 00:57:49.679
And your vision of how we get rid of it is.
1078
00:57:50.800 --> 00:57:52.800
I think a lot of humbers down. No, the state
1079
00:57:52.880 --> 00:57:53.639
comes down.
1080
00:57:53.440 --> 00:57:55.679
And I think a lot of them right like, and
1081
00:57:55.800 --> 00:57:57.079
you don't gy.
1082
00:57:56.719 --> 00:57:59.880
We prevent people from winning in the market by actually look.
1083
00:58:00.119 --> 00:58:00.960
Per se rules.
1084
00:58:01.320 --> 00:58:04.360
Look, nobody says that a stop sign is arbitrary and
1085
00:58:04.400 --> 00:58:05.840
coercive in micromanagement.
1086
00:58:05.960 --> 00:58:07.679
Okay, a stop sign just on the stop sign and
1087
00:58:07.719 -->
00:58:08.599
we okay.
1088
00:58:08.480 --> 00:58:13.000
Fair enough, but you'll you'll you know, cravaft us. A
1089
00:58:13.000 --> 00:58:16.480
stop sign just says you got to stop every single time, right,
1090
00:58:16.760 --> 00:58:19.079
It doesn't matter if anyone's around, it doesn't matter if
1091
00:58:19.119 --> 00:58:20.679
it's dangerous, you stop.
1092
00:58:20.840 --> 00:58:21.199
Okay.
1093
00:58:21.760 --> 00:58:24.199
There's no there's no like rule of reason there, it's
1094
00:58:24.280 --> 00:58:26.719
just oh well, in his particular case, I didn't give
1095
00:58:26.760 --> 00:58:29.280
you a ticket because like, a stop sign is super
1096
00:58:29.280 --> 00:58:33.800
int is super easy to administer. I am in favor
1097
00:58:33.880 --> 00:58:35.960
of a whole set of rules like that per Se
1098
00:58:36.079 --> 00:58:37.559
rules that just you.
1099
00:58:37.519 --> 00:58:39.679
Know, number of companies in a market.
1100
00:58:39.719 --> 00:58:42.039
If it's fewer than five, no merger if there are
1101
00:58:42.079 --> 00:58:45.880
certain size caps. And I like the chain broadcasting rules
1102
00:58:45.920 --> 00:58:48.679
from the FCC in the nineteen forties, which just said, no,
1103
00:58:48.840 --> 00:58:50.159
we're just going to put straight up. Well, there's a
1104
00:58:50.159 --> 00:58:52.360
whole bunch of stop signs in the economy, so everybody
1105
00:58:52.480 --> 00:58:55.400
understands what is legal and what is not, versus this
1106
00:58:55.800 --> 00:58:58.079
totally arbitrary thing where you have to spend five million
1107
00:58:58.119 --> 00:59:00.320
dollars on an economist to find out whether the thing
1108
00:59:00.360 --> 00:59:01.000
is legal or not.
1109
00:59:01.199 --> 00:59:03.559
Like, that's crazy. The whole rule of reason idea is
1110
00:59:03.639 --> 00:59:04.360
totally nuts.
1111
00:59:04.360 --> 00:59:06.320
To say we have no idea whether this violates the
1112
00:59:06.400 --> 00:59:08.480
law until we bring it before a judge and that
1113
00:59:08.559 --> 00:59:11.440
judge pontificates for five years and then makes a decision
1114
00:59:11.440 --> 00:59:13.519
Like that is a crazy that's not the rule of law.
1115
00:59:13.760 --> 00:59:17.239
So I think you just actually write rules, write real
1116
00:59:17.320 --> 00:59:19.920
rules that just say that are that are simple and
1117
00:59:19.960 --> 00:59:22.679
easy to follow, And that's how we used to do
1118
00:59:22.760 --> 00:59:24.960
it and it worked.
1119
00:59:25.239 --> 00:59:27.000
Okay, So first of all, that's not actually how we
1120
00:59:27.119 --> 00:59:29.800
used to do it. The per Se rules arose largely
1121
00:59:29.920 --> 00:59:33.320
after the rule of reason right like is pretty long standing.
1122
00:59:33.559 --> 00:59:36.480
But let's leave us. For example, the rule of reason.
1123
00:59:36.239 --> 00:59:39.239
Applying to non compete laws Team Electic, the nineteen night
1124
00:59:39.400 --> 00:59:42.800
reason and its application to non compete rules in labor
1125
00:59:42.840 --> 00:59:45.320
contract goes back to the Middle Ages, right.
1126
00:59:45.199 --> 00:59:47.960
Because we didn't have labor contracts because we didn't have printers.
1127
00:59:48.079 --> 00:59:51.559
Yeah, I have labor con We did that while they
1128
00:59:51.599 --> 00:59:53.760
were litigating them in Old England, Almos, that's why we
1129
00:59:53.800 --> 00:59:54.039
know that.
1130
00:59:54.239 --> 00:59:56.239
Yes, when they sold the bakery or something like that.
1131
00:59:56.400 --> 00:59:59.760
I mean, come on, man, this is let's talk about rules.
1132
01:00:00.400 --> 01:00:03.719
I agree with you, it's good right when we have
1133
01:00:03.800 --> 01:00:04.840
clear rules to follow.
1134
01:00:06.039 --> 01:00:07.320
The problem with.
1135
01:00:07.480 --> 01:00:10.880
Just imposing rules on everything is that those rules have costs.
1136
01:00:11.199 --> 01:00:13.639
So we could make driving safer if no one could
1137
01:00:13.639 --> 01:00:17.480
ever drive above forty five. By the same token, there
1138
01:00:17.480 --> 01:00:20.079
are lots of other rules in the economy that govern
1139
01:00:20.199 --> 01:00:23.000
conduct that isn't inherently bad. And this is the problem
1140
01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:25.400
with the argument, is that you are taking things that
1141
01:00:25.519 --> 01:00:29.079
generate benefits and you want to ban them. Don't have
1142
01:00:29.119 --> 01:00:32.760
any more discounts, right, don't ever merge. These aren't things
1143
01:00:32.760 --> 01:00:36.599
that are inherently bad. Quite the contrary, they generate lots
1144
01:00:36.599 --> 01:00:40.199
of benefits for consumers, and that is it is again
1145
01:00:40.360 --> 01:00:41.880
fair to have these policy arguments.
1146
01:00:41.880 --> 01:00:43.760
But I think we actually need to weigh the costs.
1147
01:00:44.159 --> 01:00:47.159
The drive to do things that are better for small
1148
01:00:47.199 --> 01:00:50.679
businesses and bad for consumers, which has been the thrust
1149
01:00:50.719 --> 01:00:53.400
of a lot of the criticism over the last few years,
1150
01:00:53.599 --> 01:00:56.360
is a conversation worth having as long as we take
1151
01:00:56.360 --> 01:00:58.840
into account the cost that it imposes. And I think
1152
01:00:58.880 --> 01:01:01.320
that is a really important parts of the policy conversation.
1153
01:01:01.480 --> 01:01:04.000
All right, well, I appreciate the argument against stop signs.
1154
01:01:05.800 --> 01:01:08.440
Effectively, what is you said of writing a rule for
1155
01:01:08.519 --> 01:01:11.280
everyone has costs and therefore we shouldn't do it.
1156
01:01:11.400 --> 01:01:13.800
Well, I mean, okay, context.
1157
01:01:13.599 --> 01:01:15.679
Having rules right like, we have to waive a cost
1158
01:01:15.760 --> 01:01:18.079
and the benefits, and we obviously decided as a society,
1159
01:01:18.159 --> 01:01:21.639
look hold
on that we want stop signs on certain court.
1160
01:01:23.119 --> 01:01:26.679
Having more or less rules? Is this weird libertarian fetish
1161
01:01:26.800 --> 01:01:30.119
about what freedom is. It's ridiculous to say that more
1162
01:01:30.280 --> 01:01:33.239
or fewer rules creates more or less freedom. I could
1163
01:01:33.239 --> 01:01:35.920
see a society where you have a master, and your
1164
01:01:35.960 --> 01:01:38.280
master is really nice to you and says, go do
1165
01:01:38.559 --> 01:01:41.000
whatever you want, and you are super free.
1166
01:01:41.079 --> 01:01:43.079
I could also see a society where there are no.
1167
01:01:43.119 --> 01:01:47.280
Masters, but you know gambling is illegal, and are you saying, well,
1168
01:01:47.360 --> 01:01:49.639
you get to gamble, but you have a master. Therefore
1169
01:01:49.719 --> 01:01:52.159
you're more free than people who are who don't actually
1170
01:01:52.159 --> 01:01:55.079
have masters. And it's this really dumb way to understand
1171
01:01:55.079 --> 01:01:58.440
the world, which is why intuitively we all understand that
1172
01:01:58.480 --> 01:02:02.320
when someone coerces you it's wrong in a way that
1173
01:02:02.400 --> 01:02:04.760
it is not wrong when there are just rules against
1174
01:02:04.760 --> 01:02:07.920
gambling or rules against that bind us all on basic
1175
01:02:08.039 --> 01:02:11.800
moral assumptions like it just there's just two different visions
1176
01:02:11.840 --> 01:02:14.719
of freedom here. And my vision of freedom is the
1177
01:02:14.760 --> 01:02:17.360
one that's in the Declaration of Independence, It's the one
1178
01:02:17.440 --> 01:02:20.039
that's in the Sherman Act, it's the one that's in
1179
01:02:20.079 --> 01:02:24.079
the Gettysburg Address. And your your vision of freedom is
1180
01:02:24.119 --> 01:02:26.199
the one that I'm reading English.
1181
01:02:25.920 --> 01:02:27.920
Civil War books right now. But it's it's you know,
1182
01:02:27.960 --> 01:02:30.920
it's King James, right. It's this goes back.
1183
01:02:30.719 --> 01:02:33.400
To you just are into the divine right of kings,
1184
01:02:33.440 --> 01:02:36.239
and I just think we this country was founded to
1185
01:02:36.280 --> 01:02:36.800
oppose that.
1186
01:02:37.199 --> 01:02:39.320
Thirty seconds Noah and we're finished.
1187
01:02:41.639 --> 01:02:46.440
I guess I wanted to the divine right of kings.
1188
01:02:48.280 --> 01:02:49.760
I think let me say the far I want to
1189
01:02:49.800 --> 01:02:51.480
address the audience first of all, I want to think
1190
01:02:51.480 --> 01:02:54.559
the judge. This is what I hope was, in fact,
1191
01:02:54.599 --> 01:02:57.480
a fun conversation. I don't want to be to meet
1192
01:02:57.519 --> 01:03:00.800
my other conversations. This is a more fun conversation.
1193
01:03:00.280 --> 01:03:01.280
About and I trust.
1194
01:03:01.320 --> 01:03:01.519
Yeah.
1195
01:03:02.079 --> 01:03:05.440
Let's do it up and thank you all for being here.
1196
01:03:05.599 --> 01:03:06.360
That's all I.
1197
01:03:06.280 --> 01:03:06.679
Want to say.
1198
01:03:06.840 --> 01:03:09.880
Thank you, thanks so much, and to the audience. You
1199
01:03:09.960 --> 01:03:12.599
can still send us emails with questions or comments about
1200
01:03:12.639 --> 01:03:17.400
the show at CSAs at GMU dot edu. We read
1201
01:03:17.440 --> 01:03:19.320
all of them and work to make this the best
1202
01:03:19.360 --> 01:03:21.639
show it can be. If you like what you heard today,
1203
01:03:21.639 --> 01:03:24.239
please consider sharing the episode with a friend and leaving
1204
01:03:24.280 --> 01:03:26.719
us a five star review wherever you're listening so we
1205
01:03:26.760 --> 01:03:30.119
can keep bringing you more conversations like this one. And
1206
01:03:30.119 --> 01:03:32.679
if you'd like to stay on top of our latest research, papers,
1207
01:03:32.719 --> 01:03:35.480
and events, sign up for our email list by clicking
1208
01:03:35.480 --> 01:03:36.599
the link in our show notes.
1209
01:03:37.119 --> 01:03:41.440
Thanks