TRANSKRYPCJA 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:28.920
So let's hit rewind. Welcome to Multiplex Rewind.
00:00:29.500 --> 00:00:32.320
Today, our mission is to revisit a truly remarkable
00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:35.460
free article by Brian Romer from readmultiplex
00:00:35.460 --> 00:00:38.159
.com. It's a great one. Yeah, it's titled, The
00:00:38.159 --> 00:00:40.679
Actual Reasons the QWERTY Keyword Layout Was
00:00:40.679 --> 00:00:44.490
Invented and How It Changed Us. And I mean, I
00:00:44.490 --> 00:00:46.009
have to say, diving into this source material,
00:00:46.250 --> 00:00:49.310
it is just stunning how incredibly ahead of its
00:00:49.310 --> 00:00:51.890
time this piece was. Oh, absolutely. Like in
00:00:51.890 --> 00:00:54.570
predicting our modern, almost symbiotic relationship
00:00:54.570 --> 00:00:58.020
with our keyboards. So I want you to look at
00:00:58.020 --> 00:01:00.479
the keyboard you are. Likely touching right now.
00:01:00.619 --> 00:01:02.859
Or at least have in your pocket, right? Exactly.
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:05.239
Whether it's the glowing glass on your smartphone
00:01:05.239 --> 00:01:08.099
or the physical clicking keys on your laptop,
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:10.879
that layout was not designed for your efficiency.
00:01:11.180 --> 00:01:14.260
No, not at all. It is actually a 150 -year -old
00:01:14.260 --> 00:01:16.939
marketing trick that is literally rewiring how
00:01:16.939 --> 00:01:19.900
you think, how you feel, and believe it or not,
00:01:19.939 --> 00:01:22.439
even what you are naming your babies. What's
00:01:22.439 --> 00:01:25.480
fascinating here is the sheer scale of the evolutionary
00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:28.019
disconnect. I mean, if you look at human history...
00:01:28.510 --> 00:01:31.469
Typing is a highly mechanical, rigidly linear
00:01:31.469 --> 00:01:33.950
process. Right. And that is fundamentally at
00:01:33.950 --> 00:01:36.569
odds with how we evolved to communicate. For
00:01:36.569 --> 00:01:39.370
roughly half a million years, our primary method
00:01:39.370 --> 00:01:42.349
for expressing sound and emotion and complex
00:01:42.349 --> 00:01:45.390
thought has been vocal. Just talking. Yeah. Speech
00:01:45.390 --> 00:01:48.090
is natural. It's fluid. Typing, on the other
00:01:48.090 --> 00:01:50.450
hand, is a completely artificial bottleneck that
00:01:50.450 --> 00:01:52.329
we've essentially forced our brains to adapt
00:01:52.329 --> 00:01:55.109
to. We're basically cramming this massive ancient
00:01:55.109 --> 00:01:58.760
system through a tiny filter. A very tiny, very
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:02.120
rigid mechanical filter. And to understand how
00:02:02.120 --> 00:02:04.620
this, you know, artificial layout took over our
00:02:04.620 --> 00:02:08.539
brains and our world, we first have to bust the
00:02:08.539 --> 00:02:11.039
absolute biggest myth about why it was created
00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:13.560
in the first place. The famous anti -jamming
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:17.780
story. Yes. If you've ever taken a typing class
00:02:17.780 --> 00:02:20.800
or just... browsed random historical trivia online,
00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:23.699
you've probably heard this classic folktale.
00:02:23.719 --> 00:02:26.360
The idea that the QWERTY layout was supposedly
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:29.060
designed by Christopher Latham Scholes specifically
00:02:29.060 --> 00:02:32.280
to separate highly used key combinations. Yeah,
00:02:32.319 --> 00:02:34.840
that is the prevailing myth that just refuses
00:02:34.840 --> 00:02:37.900
to die. The story claims that Scholes relied
00:02:37.900 --> 00:02:40.219
on the bigram frequency of the English language
00:02:40.219 --> 00:02:43.050
to design the board. Right. And just to unpack
00:02:43.050 --> 00:02:45.150
that term really quickly for anyone who wasn't
00:02:45.150 --> 00:02:48.030
a linguist, a bigram is basically just the frequency
00:02:48.030 --> 00:02:50.750
with which two specific letters appear right
00:02:50.750 --> 00:02:53.250
next to each other in written words. Right. Like
00:02:53.250 --> 00:02:56.349
T and H. Exactly. Like T and H in the word the
00:02:56.349 --> 00:03:00.169
or E and R in a word like letter. So the theory
00:03:00.169 --> 00:03:02.389
goes that in early mechanical typewriters, you
00:03:02.389 --> 00:03:04.930
had these little metal arms or strikers that
00:03:04.930 --> 00:03:06.889
would swing up to hit the ink ribbon. And they
00:03:06.889 --> 00:03:09.659
were clunky. Super clunky. And if you type two
00:03:09.659 --> 00:03:12.080
adjacent letters too quickly, those metal arms
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:14.400
would collide midair and just jam the machine.
00:03:14.900 --> 00:03:17.800
So supposedly, Cordy was designed to scatter
00:03:17.800 --> 00:03:20.479
those common bigrams far apart to physically
00:03:20.479 --> 00:03:23.860
slow down fast typists and prevent jams. But
00:03:23.860 --> 00:03:26.259
the source material completely dismantles that
00:03:26.259 --> 00:03:28.360
logic with just a quick look at the keyboard
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:31.639
itself. I mean... If Scholz was actually trying
00:03:31.639 --> 00:03:34.199
to separate the most common letter pairings to
00:03:34.199 --> 00:03:36.719
prevent metal strikers from colliding, putting
00:03:36.719 --> 00:03:39.259
E and R right next to each other makes absolutely
00:03:39.259 --> 00:03:42.139
zero sense. Right. Because aren't they incredibly
00:03:42.139 --> 00:03:45.939
common? Extremely common. E and R form the fourth
00:03:45.939 --> 00:03:48.340
most common letter pairing in the entire English
00:03:48.340 --> 00:03:50.919
language. And if you reverse them, you know,
00:03:50.939 --> 00:03:53.659
R and E, you get the sixth most common pairing.
00:03:53.900 --> 00:03:56.939
Wow. Yeah. So add those together and they surpass
00:03:56.939 --> 00:04:00.439
even... T and H as the single most used key combination.
00:04:01.000 --> 00:04:04.120
Yet, there they sit, side by side, basically
Load full transcript
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:06.500
touching each other on the top row of the keyboard.
00:04:06.759 --> 00:04:08.400
That immediately throws a wrench in the whole
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:11.240
anti -jamming theory right there. It really does.
00:04:11.620 --> 00:04:13.400
But the myth falls apart even further when you
00:04:13.400 --> 00:04:16.800
look at the actual timeline of when this machine
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:18.860
was invented, right? It completely collapses.
00:04:19.100 --> 00:04:21.480
When Scholz was designing and patenting this
00:04:21.480 --> 00:04:24.339
layout, which was in the late 1860s and early
00:04:24.339 --> 00:04:28.189
1870s, the concept of touch typing did not exist.
00:04:28.490 --> 00:04:30.170
Like using all your fingers without looking.
00:04:30.430 --> 00:04:33.569
Exactly. Nobody did that. Every single person
00:04:33.569 --> 00:04:36.110
who interacted with an early typewriter used
00:04:36.110 --> 00:04:39.709
a very slow, deliberate, hunt -and -peck visual
00:04:39.709 --> 00:04:42.009
method. You literally had to scan the board with
00:04:42.009 --> 00:04:43.970
your eyes, find the letter, and press it with
00:04:43.970 --> 00:04:47.089
one or two fingers. So nobody was fast enough
00:04:47.089 --> 00:04:50.170
to jam it anyway. Right. Rapid, multi -finger
00:04:50.170 --> 00:04:52.670
key jamming from blindingly fast typists wasn't
00:04:52.670 --> 00:04:55.449
a widespread problem because nobody had the physical
00:04:55.449 --> 00:04:58.019
speed to cause it yet. Okay, let's unpack this.
00:04:58.100 --> 00:05:00.379
Okay. Because I love this point so much. It just
00:05:00.379 --> 00:05:02.959
highlights the absurdity of the timeline. Yeah.
00:05:03.100 --> 00:05:05.959
It's like a mechanical engineer designing a complex
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:09.399
anti -lock braking system for a car before anyone
00:05:09.399 --> 00:05:12.079
has even conceptualized a paved road. That's
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:13.959
a great way to put it. Right. It just doesn't
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:16.259
make any sense to solve a problem that your users
00:05:16.259 --> 00:05:19.300
aren't even capable of experiencing yet. So if
00:05:19.300 --> 00:05:22.000
the layout wasn't to prevent jams for fast typists,
00:05:22.139 --> 00:05:25.259
what was Scholz actually designing for? Well,
00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:27.740
Scholz was certainly mindful of keeping the machine
00:05:27.740 --> 00:05:29.939
functional, but he was actually looking for a
00:05:29.939 --> 00:05:32.220
completely different kind of edge as he finalized
00:05:32.220 --> 00:05:34.600
his design. The truth is, right up until the
00:05:34.600 --> 00:05:36.439
very last moments before he filed the patent,
00:05:36.600 --> 00:05:39.360
the keyboard was actually set to be the Q -W
00:05:39.360 --> 00:05:43.519
-E period T -Y layout. Wait, with a period? Yeah,
00:05:43.579 --> 00:05:45.899
it had a period right where the R is currently
00:05:45.899 --> 00:05:48.959
located. The
final historical shift to QWERTY
00:05:48.959 --> 00:05:51.379
wasn't driven by some grand mechanical epiphany
00:05:51.379 --> 00:05:56.300
about efficiency. unadulterated salesmanship.
00:05:56.639 --> 00:05:58.240
And here's where it gets really interesting,
00:05:58.360 --> 00:06:00.740
because Scholz is an inventor, which means he
00:06:00.740 --> 00:06:03.060
needed funding. Oh, desperate for it. Right.
00:06:03.139 --> 00:06:05.740
He needed to manufacture these strange new machines
00:06:05.740 --> 00:06:09.639
at scale. And to do that, he had to impress skeptical
00:06:09.639 --> 00:06:13.699
buyers. So at the absolute last minute, he swapped
00:06:13.699 --> 00:06:16.120
that period on the top row for the letter R.
00:06:16.930 --> 00:06:19.269
And why did he do that? It's almost funny in
00:06:19.269 --> 00:06:22.290
retrospect. It really is. So that his early sales
00:06:22.290 --> 00:06:24.629
representatives could type the word Typewriter,
00:06:24.790 --> 00:06:27.949
or type -writer with a hyphen, which was common
00:06:27.949 --> 00:06:31.149
back then. Incredibly fast, in a single fluid
00:06:31.149 --> 00:06:34.089
motion, using just one line of keys. You really
00:06:34.089 --> 00:06:36.790
have to picture the 1800s sales environment to
00:06:36.790 --> 00:06:39.449
appreciate this. A sales representative would
00:06:39.449 --> 00:06:42.029
walk into a bustling traditional office carrying
00:06:42.029 --> 00:06:45.490
this strange, heavy, incredibly loud new machine.
00:06:45.810 --> 00:06:48.850
Probably terrified the clerics. Exactly. The
00:06:48.850 --> 00:06:51.149
potential customer is naturally skeptical of
00:06:51.149 --> 00:06:53.980
this whole contraption. But because the letters
00:06:53.980 --> 00:06:56.500
for the word typewriter were now conveniently
00:06:56.500 --> 00:06:59.740
lined up on the top row, the salesman could pound
00:06:59.740 --> 00:07:02.040
out the name of the machine with blinding speed.
00:07:02.220 --> 00:07:04.319
Right. And they could do this parlor trick all
00:07:04.319 --> 00:07:06.980
while maintaining steady, confident eye contact
00:07:06.980 --> 00:07:09.540
with the customer. It is wild to think about.
00:07:09.920 --> 00:07:12.879
We use this global standard every single day
00:07:12.879 --> 00:07:15.579
of our lives. It dictates the hardware of billions
00:07:15.579 --> 00:07:18.040
of devices across the planet, from laptops to
00:07:18.040 --> 00:07:20.680
smartphones to industrial control panels. Everywhere.
00:07:21.259 --> 00:07:23.860
And it was fundamentally shaped by the 1800s
00:07:23.860 --> 00:07:26.500
equivalent of a flashy tech demo. Just a gimmick.
00:07:26.779 --> 00:07:28.860
Literally just a parlor trick to make the sales
00:07:28.860 --> 00:07:31.180
pitch look cooler. It was a highly effective
00:07:31.180 --> 00:07:33.920
parlor trick, though. That flashiness is largely
00:07:33.920 --> 00:07:36.259
what helped Scholz secure a serious manufacturing
00:07:36.259 --> 00:07:39.459
partner. He eventually found E. Remington & Sons,
00:07:39.579 --> 00:07:41.920
a massive company that originally made firearms
00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:44.220
and sewing machines. Right. Remington. Yeah.
00:07:44.300 --> 00:07:46.339
So they bought the patents. and their marketing
00:07:46.339 --> 00:07:48.939
team, specifically a group called Wyckoff, Siemens,
00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:51.240
and Benedict, they looked at the typewriter and
00:07:51.240 --> 00:07:53.839
realized something crucial. They didn't just
00:07:53.839 --> 00:07:56.259
see a piece of office equipment to sell. What
00:07:56.259 --> 00:07:58.839
did they see? They saw an educational empire
00:07:58.839 --> 00:08:01.839
waiting to be built. As we continue this multiplex
00:08:01.839 --> 00:08:04.399
rewind, we really have to look at how that educational
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:07.839
empire completely shifted the landscape. Because
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:09.939
it wasn't the metal bars or the mechanics that
00:08:09.939 --> 00:08:12.360
locked us into QWERTY. No, not at all. It was
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:15.509
the human brain. How did a neat sales trick for
00:08:15.509 --> 00:08:18.689
a heavy machine become an inescapable global
00:08:18.689 --> 00:08:21.569
standard a century and a half later? It happened
00:08:21.569 --> 00:08:24.050
through one of the most brilliant and aggressive
00:08:24.050 --> 00:08:27.129
educational campaigns in business history. Remington
00:08:27.129 --> 00:08:29.290
knew that to sell typewriters at scale, they
00:08:29.290 --> 00:08:31.509
needed a vast workforce that actually knew how
00:08:31.509 --> 00:08:33.750
to use them efficiently. Because a machine is
00:08:33.750 --> 00:08:36.029
useless if nobody knows how to operate it. Exactly.
00:08:36.539 --> 00:08:38.240
So they started partnering with private business
00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:41.480
colleges, universities, and crucially, the YWCA,
00:08:41.700 --> 00:08:44.360
the Young Women's Christian Association. They
00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:46.700
offered free or heavily discounted typewriters
00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:49.000
to these institutions. But there was a catch,
00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:51.860
right? Yes. They bundled them with a proprietary,
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:55.340
trademarked touch typing course. The societal
00:08:55.340 --> 00:08:58.360
impact of that specific move is just staggering.
00:08:58.679 --> 00:09:01.500
Prior to this, clerical work was a heavily male
00:09:01.500 --> 00:09:03.929
-dominated field. The source points out that
00:09:03.929 --> 00:09:07.470
in 1874, less than 4 % of clerical workers in
00:09:07.470 --> 00:09:10.470
the U .S. were women. Almost none. Right. But
00:09:10.470 --> 00:09:13.389
by 1900, largely because of these typing schools
00:09:13.389 --> 00:09:15.470
and the expanding secretarial job market they
00:09:15.470 --> 00:09:19.309
created, that number skyrocketed to roughly 75%.
00:09:19.309 --> 00:09:22.169
It
fundamentally altered the workforce demographics.
00:09:22.409 --> 00:09:25.149
But the true genius of Remington's strategy was
00:09:25.149 --> 00:09:27.009
the methodology of the typing course itself.
00:09:27.210 --> 00:09:30.120
They introduced the concept of... home keys,
00:09:30.279 --> 00:09:32.620
and force students to memorize the layout without
00:09:32.620 --> 00:09:35.240
ever looking down at their hands. Which takes
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:37.720
a lot of time. A massive amount of time. The
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:40.620
source notes that it takes about 400 hours of
00:09:40.620 --> 00:09:42.980
repetitive practice to achieve the basic neurological
00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:46.379
reflexes for this, and up to 600 hours to become
00:09:46.379 --> 00:09:49.779
a true expert. Wow. Yeah. So what Remington did
00:09:49.779 --> 00:09:52.600
was essentially program the QWERTY layout directly
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:55.740
into the subconscious neurological software of
00:09:55.740 --> 00:09:58.350
the typist's brain. And once you install that
00:09:58.350 --> 00:10:01.149
specific software, it is nearly impossible to
00:10:01.149 --> 00:10:04.330
uninstall or overwrite it. And Remington actually
00:10:04.330 --> 00:10:06.750
weaponized that difficulty. They claimed at the
00:10:06.750 --> 00:10:09.289
time that if a trained QWERTY typist moved to
00:10:09.289 --> 00:10:12.029
any other layout on a competitor's machine, their
00:10:12.029 --> 00:10:15.250
words per minute would drop by about 80%. That's
00:10:15.250 --> 00:10:18.309
a huge hit to productivity. Huge. The physical
00:10:18.309 --> 00:10:20.490
and cognitive frustration of trying to unlearn
00:10:20.490 --> 00:10:23.230
that muscle memory was immense. The source even
00:10:23.230 --> 00:10:25.769
mentions a fascinating study from the late 1950s
00:10:25.769 --> 00:10:28.470
in Alaska, where schoolchildren were taught on
00:10:28.470 --> 00:10:31.309
a sequential alphabetical keyboard. Oh, interesting.
00:10:31.610 --> 00:10:33.970
Yeah, and they eventually matched the speed of
00:10:33.970 --> 00:10:36.690
standard QWERTY typists, but the entire experiment
00:10:36.690 --> 00:10:38.929
had to be shut down prematurely. Wait, why shut
00:10:38.929 --> 00:10:41.309
it down if it was actually working? Because parents
00:10:41.309 --> 00:10:43.830
were outraged. They felt their kids were being
00:10:43.830 --> 00:10:46.549
damaged for the real world, basically. These
00:10:46.549 --> 00:10:48.950
students couldn't use standard QWERTY typewriters
00:10:48.950 --> 00:10:51.690
anymore without extreme frustration. It took
00:10:51.690 --> 00:10:54.490
some of those kids a full year of intensive retraining
00:10:54.490 --> 00:10:57.289
just to deprogram their brains and learn QWERTY.
00:10:58.019 --> 00:11:00.440
If we connect this to the bigger picture, this
00:11:00.440 --> 00:11:03.259
completely destroys the way a lot of classic
00:11:03.259 --> 00:11:06.379
economic theories view technology adoption. You
00:11:06.379 --> 00:11:08.840
constantly hear QWERTY compared to the Betamax
00:11:08.840 --> 00:11:11.679
versus VHS format war. Oh yeah, people use that
00:11:11.679 --> 00:11:13.639
all the time. Right, as the ultimate example
00:11:13.639 --> 00:11:16.779
of how a technically inferior product wins just
00:11:16.779 --> 00:11:19.700
because of winner -takes -all capitalism. That
00:11:19.700 --> 00:11:23.399
analogy completely misses the mark here. It ignores
00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:25.799
the historical reality of how the market was
00:11:25.799 --> 00:11:28.740
actually formed. QWERTY didn't win simply because
00:11:28.740 --> 00:11:30.940
Remington was a big monopoly with more money.
00:11:31.240 --> 00:11:34.440
It won because Remington successfully programmed
00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:37.639
their specific arbitrary layout into the cognitive
00:11:37.639 --> 00:11:41.179
software of an entire generation of users. They
00:11:41.179 --> 00:11:43.580
created a workforce that was literally incapable
00:11:43.580 --> 00:11:46.700
of using a competitor's machine without immense
00:11:46.700 --> 00:11:49.980
psychological friction. Without that front -loaded
00:11:49.980 --> 00:11:52.740
educational lock -in, QWERTY would have just
00:11:52.740 --> 00:11:55.059
been one of a hundred competing patents lost
00:11:55.059 --> 00:11:57.740
to history. It's the ultimate proprietary software
00:11:57.740 --> 00:12:00.200
lock -in, installed right into the human nervous
00:12:00.200 --> 00:12:03.120
system. Exactly. But this is where the deep dive
00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:06.120
gets a little unnerving. We've established how
00:12:06.120 --> 00:12:08.179
QWERTY got locked into our muscle memory a century
00:12:08.179 --> 00:12:11.340
ago. But how is that antique lock -in dictating
00:12:11.340 --> 00:12:13.480
our modern behavior in ways we don't even realize?
00:12:14.210 --> 00:12:16.629
Because according to the article, it is actively
00:12:16.629 --> 00:12:19.289
influencing deeply personal choices we make every
00:12:19.289 --> 00:12:21.970
single day. Yeah. The source explores a fascinating
00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:24.750
psychological phenomenon called the Cordy effect,
00:12:24.990 --> 00:12:27.350
which is driven by something known as the right
00:12:27.350 --> 00:12:31.129
side ratio or RSR bias. OK, break that down for
00:12:31.129 --> 00:12:33.710
us. Well, think about how your hands naturally
00:12:33.710 --> 00:12:36.620
rest on a standard keyboard. Because of where
00:12:36.620 --> 00:12:38.799
Scholes randomly placed the letters, the QWERTY
00:12:38.799 --> 00:12:41.580
layout cramps a huge number of frequently used
00:12:41.580 --> 00:12:45.440
consonants like E, A, S, T, and R onto the left
00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:47.539
side of the board. Right. Or it places them in
00:12:47.539 --> 00:12:49.759
positions that require awkward finger stretches.
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:52.379
For the majority of the population, which is
00:12:52.379 --> 00:12:54.980
right -handed, this means your non -dominant,
00:12:54.980 --> 00:12:57.620
weaker left hand is doing a disproportionate
00:12:57.620 --> 00:13:00.200
amount of the heavy lifting. So the left hand
00:13:00.200 --> 00:13:02.799
is constantly underdoing this, like, subtle subconscious
00:13:02.799 --> 00:13:05.809
mechanical strain. Just to type basic English
00:13:05.809 --> 00:13:08.429
words. Yes. And because the brain is always trying
00:13:08.429 --> 00:13:11.389
to optimize for energy conservation, it recognizes
00:13:11.389 --> 00:13:14.490
that subconscious strain. Over time, humans have
00:13:14.490 --> 00:13:16.909
developed a measurable psychological disfavor
00:13:16.909 --> 00:13:19.490
for words that rely heavily on those strenuous
00:13:19.490 --> 00:13:22.490
left -hand keystrokes. Wait, hold on. Are you
00:13:22.490 --> 00:13:24.690
telling me I might name my kid something different
00:13:24.690 --> 00:13:28.509
just because A or E is harder to reach with my
00:13:28.509 --> 00:13:31.250
left ring finger than an L is with my right?
00:13:31.570 --> 00:13:34.299
Basically, yes. That sounds like a massive stretch.
00:13:34.759 --> 00:13:36.720
I'm having a hard time buying that our brains
00:13:36.720 --> 00:13:39.220
are that petty. I know it sounds almost like
00:13:39.220 --> 00:13:42.379
science fiction, but the data is incredibly robust.
00:13:42.639 --> 00:13:46.259
The RSR bias actually does impact baby names.
00:13:46.620 --> 00:13:48.720
Researchers have tracked this over the decades
00:13:48.720 --> 00:13:51.419
since Cordy became the absolute global standard.
00:13:51.799 --> 00:13:54.539
And what do they find? Names that utilize more
00:13:54.539 --> 00:13:56.899
right -hand keystrokes. names that are physically
00:13:56.899 --> 00:13:59.700
easier and more fluid to type, have steadily
00:13:59.700 --> 00:14:02.139
increased in popularity across the population
00:14:02.139 --> 00:14:05.679
compared to left -hand dominant names. Your brain
00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:08.159
subtly rewards you for choosing words that don't
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:11.320
cause micro -friction in your fingers. That is
00:14:11.320 --> 00:14:14.259
just, it's mind -blowing. The name you give your
00:14:14.259 --> 00:14:17.200
child, which is an incredibly emotional and personal
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:19.899
decision, might be subconsciously influenced
00:14:19.899 --> 00:14:23.500
by a salesman's parlor trick from 1868. It really
00:14:23.500 --> 00:14:25.960
might be. And it doesn't stop at baby names,
00:14:26.019 --> 00:14:29.850
does it? This hidden bias affects how we interact
00:14:29.850 --> 00:14:32.409
with the entire digital economy. It bleeds into
00:14:32.409 --> 00:14:34.830
almost every text -based interaction we have.
00:14:35.070 --> 00:14:37.950
Studies analyzing massive data sets of reviews
00:14:37.950 --> 00:14:41.669
on platforms like Amazon, Netflix, and Yelp show
00:14:41.669 --> 00:14:45.070
a clear and consistent RSR bias. Really? Yeah,
00:14:45.070 --> 00:14:47.450
when reviewers use words that lean heavily toward
00:14:47.450 --> 00:14:50.309
right -hand keystrokes, they systematically tend
00:14:50.309 --> 00:15:00.809
to leave... So what does this all mean? Like,
00:15:00.809 --> 00:15:03.029
imagine if you go to a restaurant, you have a
00:15:03.029 --> 00:15:05.429
nice meal, and you decide to leave a glowing
00:15:05.429 --> 00:15:08.169
five -star review. You think you're being totally
00:15:08.169 --> 00:15:11.029
objective about the food, but that rating might
00:15:11.029 --> 00:15:12.929
secretly be inflated because your left pinky
00:15:12.929 --> 00:15:15.009
finger didn't have to stretch as much while you
00:15:15.009 --> 00:15:16.730
were typing it out in the parking lot. That's
00:15:16.730 --> 00:15:19.830
exactly what the data suggests. We think we are
00:15:19.830 --> 00:15:22.450
in complete control. but we are constantly being
00:15:22.450 --> 00:15:25.250
manipulated by the ergonomics of a 150 -year
00:15:25.250 --> 00:15:27.990
-old machine. But, you know, the keyboard isn't
00:15:27.990 --> 00:15:30.570
just steering our preferences. It's acting as
00:15:30.570 --> 00:15:33.509
a massive bottleneck for human bandwidth. It's
00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:35.450
completely altering the structure of our thought
00:15:35.450 --> 00:15:37.730
processes. This is where we hit the absolute
00:15:37.730 --> 00:15:40.610
physical limits of human cognition, and it is
00:15:40.610 --> 00:15:44.110
a severe bottleneck. The human brain is a processing
00:15:44.110 --> 00:15:47.240
engine of unimaginable scale. Unconsciously,
00:15:47.240 --> 00:15:49.100
your brain is taking in and processing about
00:15:49.100 --> 00:15:52.779
11 million bits of raw data per second from all
00:15:52.779 --> 00:15:55.799
of your senses. Wait, 11 million? 11 million
00:15:55.799 --> 00:16:00.179
bits per second. Sight, sound, temperature, balance,
00:16:00.379 --> 00:16:03.940
all of it. But your conscious mind, the part
00:16:03.940 --> 00:16:06.820
of you that is aware and thinking, it maxes out
00:16:06.820 --> 00:16:10.559
at processing about 41 bits per second. That
00:16:10.559 --> 00:16:13.950
is a massive drop. And most of the time in a
00:16:13.950 --> 00:16:15.549
relaxed state, you're only dealing with about
00:16:15.549 --> 00:16:19.230
16 bits per second. Let's break that down because
00:16:19.230 --> 00:16:21.730
going from 11 million bits per second in the
00:16:21.730 --> 00:16:25.429
background down to 16 bits of like active thought
00:16:25.429 --> 00:16:29.269
is that's a catastrophic drop off. It is massive.
00:16:29.490 --> 00:16:32.909
Yeah. To manage that tiny, fragile, conscious
00:16:32.909 --> 00:16:35.309
bandwidth, our brains rely on a technique called
00:16:35.309 --> 00:16:37.850
chunking. The article references the landmark
00:16:37.850 --> 00:16:40.769
work of Professor George A. Miller from Harvard
00:16:40.769 -->
00:16:43.590
in the 1950s. Oh, right, specifically his famous
00:16:43.590 --> 00:16:46.669
paper on the magical number seven plus or minus
00:16:46.669 --> 00:16:49.370
two? Exactly. Yeah. The concept that the human
00:16:49.370 --> 00:16:51.549
brain can only hold about seven items in its
00:16:51.549 --> 00:16:53.549
short -term working memory at any given time.
00:16:54.129 --> 00:16:56.490
And to deal with that tiny 16 -bit bandwidth
00:16:56.490 --> 00:16:58.730
limitation, the brain takes complex information
00:16:58.730 --> 00:17:01.350
and groups it into smaller, manageable chunks.
00:17:01.629 --> 00:17:03.730
Like grouping things together so they take up
00:17:03.730 --> 00:17:06.190
less space in the buffer. Right. And the source
00:17:06.190 --> 00:17:08.509
uses a brilliant historical example to illustrate
00:17:08.509 --> 00:17:11.490
this, the early days of Bell Labs. When they
00:17:11.490 --> 00:17:13.490
were figuring out how to format phone numbers
00:17:13.490 --> 00:17:16.549
as they moved away from the old word -based mnemonics,
00:17:16.670 --> 00:17:18.670
they actually brought Professor Miller in to
00:17:18.670 --> 00:17:21.170
consult. Oh, that makes so much sense. Yeah.
00:17:21.210 --> 00:17:23.450
And through extensive research, they confirmed
00:17:23.450 --> 00:17:25.710
that if you just give someone a string of 10
00:17:25.710 --> 00:17:28.390
random numbers, their buffer overflows and they
00:17:28.390 --> 00:17:30.509
forget it. So they artificially created chunks
00:17:30.509 --> 00:17:32.809
to help the brain out. That's why our phone numbers
00:17:32.809 --> 00:17:35.490
are formatted the way they are today? Yes. They
00:17:35.490 --> 00:17:38.450
became formatted as a three -digit chunk, a dash,
00:17:38.589 --> 00:17:41.150
and a four -digit chunk. The dash isn't just
00:17:41.150 --> 00:17:44.390
punctuation. It acts as a vital visual aid to
00:17:44.390 --> 00:17:47.269
break the data into digestible pieces. Even the
00:17:47.269 --> 00:17:50.150
parentheses around an area code act as a cognitive
00:17:50.150 --> 00:17:52.589
prompt, telling the brain to pull that specific
00:17:52.589 --> 00:17:55.069
chunk from a different area of long -term memory.
00:17:55.450 --> 00:17:57.730
The source even mentions that if you think about
00:17:57.730 --> 00:17:59.970
a phone number you know really well, it almost
00:17:59.970 --> 00:18:02.569
plays like a melodic rhythm in your head. It
00:18:02.569 --> 00:18:05.769
does. And Bell Labs found that the physical spatial
00:18:05.769 --> 00:18:07.990
pattern your finger makes on a touch -tone keypad
00:18:07.990 --> 00:18:11.289
actually reinforces that memorization. Your brain
00:18:11.289 --> 00:18:13.450
is just leaning on every little trick you can
00:18:13.450 --> 00:18:15.769
find to handle data within that tiny bandwidth.
00:18:16.029 --> 00:18:18.890
Now take that severe biological limitation and
00:18:18.890 --> 00:18:21.349
apply it to the act of typing on
a QWERTY keyboard.
00:18:21.930 --> 00:18:24.089
When you speak to someone, you communicate in
00:18:24.089 --> 00:18:26.930
full concepts. Right. It just flows. A whole
00:18:26.930 --> 00:18:29.809
thought complete with emotion and nuance is formulated
00:18:29.809 --> 00:18:32.559
and vocalized almost instantly. But when you
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:35.099
are forced to type, you have to serialize your
00:18:35.099 --> 00:18:37.099
thoughts. You have to take a beautiful, holistic
00:18:37.099 --> 00:18:40.079
concept, break it down into a sequence of individual
00:18:40.079 --> 00:18:43.000
words, and then agonizingly break those words
00:18:43.000 --> 00:18:46.839
down letter by letter by letter. You are mechanically
00:18:46.839 --> 00:18:49.619
transcribing your inner voice. And the problem
00:18:49.619 --> 00:18:52.640
is, while your fingers are pecking away at the
00:18:52.640 --> 00:18:55.559
first part of the sentence, your brain is desperately
00:18:55.559 --> 00:18:57.640
trying to hold the rest of the concept in that
00:18:57.640 --> 00:19:01.089
tiny, seven -item temporary buffer. And that
00:19:01.089 --> 00:19:04.230
buffer overflows constantly. Your right hemisphere
00:19:04.230 --> 00:19:07.410
is producing rich conceptual output far faster
00:19:07.410 --> 00:19:09.869
than your mechanical left hemisphere can handle
00:19:09.869 --> 00:19:12.230
the physical typing process. So you just lose
00:19:12.230 --> 00:19:15.789
it. The buffer fills up, the brain gets overwhelmed,
00:19:15.970 --> 00:19:18.990
and the remaining thoughts just vanish. We have
00:19:18.990 --> 00:19:21.450
all experienced this maddening phenomenon. You
00:19:21.450 --> 00:19:24.009
have a brilliant... perfectly articulated paragraph
00:19:24.009 --> 00:19:26.609
in your head, you start typing furiously, and
00:19:26.609 --> 00:19:29.210
halfway through, you completely lose the end
00:19:29.210 --> 00:19:31.170
of the thought. It's the worst feeling. That
00:19:31.170 --> 00:19:34.309
idea is gone, perhaps forever, simply because
00:19:34.309 --> 00:19:36.109
your fingers could not keep up with the speed
00:19:36.109 --> 00:19:38.529
of your brain. It's tragic when you really sit
00:19:38.529 --> 00:19:40.890
and think about it. And it's not just making
00:19:40.890 --> 00:19:43.970
us lose great ideas. The article points out that
00:19:43.970 --> 00:19:46.130
this mechanical slowdown causes deep psychological
00:19:46.130 --> 00:19:49.029
friction. Oh, immense friction. Think about the
00:19:49.029 --> 00:19:51.450
absolute meltdowns you see in social media arguments.
00:19:52.089 --> 00:19:54.210
People assume it's just the anonymity of the
00:19:54.210 --> 00:19:56.549
Internet, but the source argues that a lot of
00:19:56.549 --> 00:19:59.150
that rage is amplified by the physical bottleneck
00:19:59.150 --> 00:20:01.990
of the keyboard. It absolutely is. They are angry.
00:20:02.250 --> 00:20:04.769
They have a flood of emotion and complex thought,
00:20:04.869 --> 00:20:08.029
and they literally feel trapped. The dissonance
00:20:08.029 --> 00:20:11.250
between how fast they feel and how slow they
00:20:11.250 --> 00:20:14.349
can output creates a literal rage because they
00:20:14.349 --> 00:20:16.769
cannot mechanically express themselves fast enough.
00:20:17.089 --> 00:20:20.130
This raises an important question. Why do we
00:20:20.130 --> 00:20:23.049
continue to accept this limitation? The common
00:20:23.049 --> 00:20:24.849
defense of the keyboard is the bicycle metaphor.
00:20:25.009 --> 00:20:28.049
People say typing is like riding a bicycle. It's
00:20:28.049 --> 00:20:30.309
a machine that amplifies our natural abilities
00:20:30.309 --> 00:20:32.750
and gives us more power. Right, which makes sense
00:20:32.750 --> 00:20:34.809
historically. And historically, that's undeniably
00:20:34.809 --> 00:20:37.089
true. I mean, the keyboard ushered in the entire
00:20:37.089 --> 00:20:40.210
information age. But if we expand that metaphor,
00:20:40.490 --> 00:20:42.710
the bicycle eventually gave way to the automobile.
00:20:43.190 --> 00:20:45.789
Yes, a bicycle amplifies your leg muscles, making
00:20:45.789 --> 00:20:49.539
you faster than walking. But an engine... bypasses
00:20:49.539 --> 00:20:52.339
the need for leg muscles entirely. Oh wow. The
00:20:52.339 --> 00:20:55.059
keyboard is just a bicycle. It is a stopover
00:20:55.059 --> 00:20:57.940
point in our technological evolution. Because
00:20:57.940 --> 00:21:02.039
at its core it is fundamentally unnatural. Speech
00:21:02.039 --> 00:21:04.079
is the natural byproduct of millions of years
00:21:04.079 --> 00:21:07.509
of evolution. Typing requires us to route our
00:21:07.509 --> 00:21:10.049
thoughts through an artificial sequential pathway
00:21:10.049 --> 00:21:13.430
that forces us to focus on micro mechanics rather
00:21:13.430 --> 00:21:16.170
than macro concepts. Right. The author argues
00:21:16.170 --> 00:21:18.829
that this immense friction is exactly why the
00:21:18.829 --> 00:21:22.210
future is the voice first revolution. As technology
00:21:22.210 --> 00:21:24.829
finally catches up, as machines become capable
00:21:24.829 --> 00:21:27.849
of truly understanding natural language, nuance
00:21:27.849 --> 00:21:31.329
and context, speech will completely bypass all
00:21:31.329 --> 00:21:33.470
of that mechanical load. We won't need the keyboard
00:21:33.470 --> 00:21:36.319
at all. We will return to the way we were biologically
00:21:36.319 --> 00:21:39.400
designed to communicate, removing the QWERTY
00:21:39.400 --> 00:21:42.119
bottleneck entirely and freeing up all of that
00:21:42.119 --> 00:21:44.859
lost cognitive bandwidth. It is a profound shift
00:21:44.859 --> 00:21:47.319
in perspective to realize that we are currently
00:21:47.319 --> 00:21:50.380
living through a massive, century -long open
00:21:50.380 --> 00:21:53.400
experiment and how a piece of 1860s hardware
00:21:53.400 --> 00:21:56.220
fundamentally alters human cognition. It really
00:21:56.220 --> 00:21:58.930
is wild. If you want to dive deeper into this
00:21:58.930 --> 00:22:00.650
and really understand the intricate mechanics
00:22:00.650 --> 00:22:03.450
of how our tools shape our minds, you absolutely
00:22:03.450 --> 00:22:06.410
need to read the full original free article at
00:22:06.410 --> 00:22:09.230
readmultiplex .com. The depth of historical and
00:22:09.230 --> 00:22:11.029
psychological research there is just incredible.
00:22:11.289 --> 00:22:14.109
It really is a masterful synthesis of history,
00:22:14.349 --> 00:22:17.250
psychology, and technology. It connects dots
00:22:17.250 --> 00:22:19.430
that most people never even think to look at.
00:22:19.809 --> 00:22:22.049
And for those of you who want to push the boundaries
00:22:22.049 --> 00:22:24.789
even further, I highly recommend checking out
00:22:24.789 --> 00:22:26.930
another piece on the site if you are a member.
00:22:27.289 --> 00:22:29.970
You can read the article titled The New Intersection
00:22:29.970 --> 00:22:33.089
of Arts and Sciences in Technology. It's another
00:22:33.089 --> 00:22:35.690
fantastic one. It is exactly the kind of forward
00:22:35.690 --> 00:22:37.789
-thinking analysis that challenges how you see
00:22:37.789 --> 00:22:40.210
the world and where we are heading next. The
00:22:40.210 --> 00:22:42.349
connections made in these pieces are vital for
00:22:42.349 --> 00:22:44.529
understanding not just where technology has been,
00:22:44.650 --> 00:22:47.869
but where it is inevitably going. So I want to
00:22:47.869 --> 00:22:50.089
leave you with this final thought to chew on
00:22:50.089 --> 00:22:52.950
as you go about your day. We just learned that
00:22:52.950 --> 00:22:56.109
our conscious bandwidth is incredibly tiny. And
00:22:56.109 --> 00:22:58.170
our current primary method of digital communication,
00:22:58.470 --> 00:23:01.630
the QWERTY keyboard, was basically cobbled together
00:23:01.630 --> 00:23:04.809
for a quick sales pitch in the 1860s. Yep. It
00:23:04.809 --> 00:23:07.470
forces us to artificially serialize our thoughts,
00:23:07.609 --> 00:23:09.950
constantly overflowing our mental buffer and
00:23:09.950 --> 00:23:12.809
causing endless frustration. So if our minds
00:23:12.809 --> 00:23:15.349
are currently bottlenecked by an antique typewriter
00:23:15.349 --> 00:23:18.589
layout, what world -changing ideas are you losing
00:23:18.589 --> 00:23:21.309
every single day just because your fingers can't
00:23:21.309 --> 00:23:23.390
keep up with your imagination? That's the real
00:23:23.390 --> 00:23:25.549
question. If you want to support this kind of
00:23:25.549 --> 00:23:28.470
independent paradigm shifting research, we invite
00:23:28.470 --> 00:23:30.789
you to become a member at readmultiplex .com.
00:23:30.829 --> 00:23:34.250
Just click join us. Or you can support Read Multiplex
00:23:34.250 --> 00:23:36.930
with a donation. Thanks for listening to Multiplex
00:23:36.930 --> 00:23:39.230
Rewind. Yeah, thanks everyone. This has been
00:23:39.230 --> 00:23:40.450
Multiplex Rewind.