Exploring Adaptive Perception Disorder: The Blind Spot Holding Your Business Hostage ၏ စာသားမှတ်တမ်းအပြည့်အစုံ

suggests either they don't really grasp the changes needed or maybe 63 00:04:13,330 --> 00:04:16,769 they just don't wanna face the hard specifics. Easier to say north without a 64 00:04:16,769 --> 00:04:20,610 compass. And Wolf just nails it, I think. Mhmm. He says these are signs 65 00:04:20,610 --> 00:04:24,235 of strength. It's change blindness dressed up as 66 00:04:24,235 --> 00:04:27,915 confidence. Oh, I like that phrasing. Change blindness dressed up as 67 00:04:27,915 --> 00:04:31,615 confidence. It implies the organization is so convinced it's okay, 68 00:04:31,835 --> 00:04:35,490 it literally can't see the warning sign. Pretty much. So, okay, those are the 69 00:04:35,490 --> 00:04:39,250 general symptoms. But he also breaks APD down further into these, 70 00:04:39,970 --> 00:04:43,810 telltale subtypes, more specific ways it shows up. Okay. Interesting. What are those? He's 71 00:04:43,810 --> 00:04:47,650 got four. The first is perceptual change deficiency, PCD. This is the don't 72 00:04:47,650 --> 00:04:51,275 worry. It's just temporary mindset. The this too shall pass approach 73 00:04:51,275 --> 00:04:54,875 even when it's clearly not passing. Exactly. His analogy is 74 00:04:54,875 --> 00:04:58,715 brilliant. Facing a tidal wave with just an umbrella. You feel like 75 00:04:58,715 --> 00:05:02,400 you're doing something, but you fundamentally misjudged the scale of the threat. That 76 00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:06,000 really hits the denial aspect, doesn't it? Refusing to see that the change might be 77 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,780 permanent. What drives that, I wonder? Wishful thinking, 78 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:14,080 lack of data. Could be all of those. Then there's change blindness 79 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:17,824 syndrome, CBS. This is where the signs have been obvious. Ages. 80 00:05:17,824 --> 00:05:21,664 Wolf says, like, three years loudly and with neon 81 00:05:21,664 --> 00:05:25,505 signs. Okay. So really unmissable signs. You'd think. But the reaction 82 00:05:25,505 --> 00:05:29,345 is still, woah, where did that come from? Like, they genuinely didn't see 83 00:05:29,345 --> 00:05:32,969 it. They're so stuck in their ways. They're blind to the new reality right there. 84 00:05:32,969 --> 00:05:36,590 CBS, that points to a failure in environmental scanning, maybe. 85 00:05:36,969 --> 00:05:40,750 We're just not connecting the dots internally. Why miss the neon signs? 86 00:05:40,810 --> 00:05:44,595 Information overload perhaps or just nobody listening? Good question. 87 00:05:44,815 --> 00:05:48,655 The third one is adaptive overconfidence disorder, AOD. This 88 00:05:48,655 --> 00:05:52,495 is the classic, oh, we're great at change, always have been. 89 00:05:52,495 --> 00:05:55,950 The legacy argument, we handled y two k. We can handle anything. 90 00:05:56,030 --> 00:05:58,850 Exactly. But Wolf pushes back hard. 91 00:05:59,470 --> 00:06:03,310 Really? When was the last big adaptation? 02/2008. That 92 00:06:03,310 --> 00:06:07,150 one software upgrade. He points out it's often based on 93 00:06:07,150 --> 00:06:10,575 isolated, maybe outdated examples, not proof of current 94 00:06:10,575 --> 00:06:14,095 capability. Yeah. AOD sounds dangerous because it creates this 95 00:06:14,095 --> 00:06:17,855 false security blanket. Past success in a different world 96 00:06:17,855 --> 00:06:21,615 doesn't mean you're fit for today's race, like a marathoner thinking they're ready for a 97 00:06:21,615 --> 00:06:25,310 sprint, as you said. Nicely put. And the final subtype, 98 00:06:25,610 --> 00:06:28,910 strategic narcissism, s n. Strategic narcissism. 99 00:06:29,210 --> 00:06:33,050 Sounds serious. It is. This is the belief that, the market 100 00:06:33,050 --> 00:06:36,890 will come back to us eventually. They're so convinced of their own inherent brilliance, their 101 00:06:36,890 --> 00:06:40,705 product's superiority. But they refuse to see the market has just moved on, found 102 00:06:40,705 --> 00:06:44,305 something faster, cheaper, better. Precisely. It's this internal 103 00:06:44,305 --> 00:06:47,745 arrogance, this belief that history guarantees future relevance. Even when 104 00:06:47,745 --> 00:06:51,585 everything's changed, you see it with established players sometimes, dismissing the new kids on 105 00:06:51,585 --> 00:06:55,020 the block. Right. Until it's too late. Okay. So 106 00:06:55,020 --> 00:06:58,080 PCD, CBS, AOD, SN, 107 00:06:58,540 --> 00:07:01,980 different flavors of the same basic problem. But what are the 108 00:07:01,980 --> 00:07:05,820 actual, like, tangible consequences? Why should a business leader or 109 00:07:05,820 --> 00:07:09,465 even an employee really care about spotting this 110 00:07:09,465 --> 00:07:13,305 APD? What's the real cost? Well, Wolf spells out 111 00:07:13,305 --> 00:07:16,985 some pretty stark outcomes. He says companies with APD end up building 112 00:07:16,985 --> 00:07:20,745 their whole systems, their processes, everything on assumptions that 113 00:07:20,745 --> 00:07:24,210 are just obsolete. So building on shaky ground. 114 00:07:24,270 --> 00:07:27,490 Totally. Think about pouring money into tech that's about to be irrelevant 115 00:07:27,949 --> 00:07:31,470 or training people for jobs that won't exist soon. It's a huge 116 00:07:31,470 --> 00:07:35,310 misdirection of effort and money. Wasted resources, investing in horse drawn 117 00:07:35,310 --> 00:07:39,115 carriages when cars are taking over as you mentioned earlier. Exactly that. And 118 00:07:39,115 --> 00:07:42,735 he also talks about how these organizations tend to stick to their comfort zones, 119 00:07:43,035 --> 00:07:46,715 familiar processes, familiar tech, even if it's actually holding them back. That 120 00:07:46,715 --> 00:07:50,475 resistance to leaving the familiar, it strangles innovation, doesn't it? 121 00:07:50,475 --> 00:07:54,250 Prevents them from building the new muscles they need. They get stuck 122

00:07:54,250 --> 00:07:57,610 in an echo chamber, reinforcing the old ways. Yeah. And the image he uses to 123 00:07:57,610 --> 00:08:01,210 capture the end result is chilling. He quotes the 124 00:08:01,210 --> 00:08:05,055 doctor Eli Burnham. Organizations with APD don't burn out. 125 00:08:05,134 --> 00:08:08,115 They rot quietly. Rot quietly. 126 00:08:09,134 --> 00:08:12,435 That's powerful. Not a big explosion, but a slow internal 127 00:08:12,495 --> 00:08:16,255 decay. Right. An insidious decline that might not be obvious until it's 128 00:08:16,255 --> 00:08:20,014 very, very advanced. It really highlights those unseen long term 129 00:08:20,014 --> 00:08:23,760 costs of just failing to keep up. Incredibly impactful. 130 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:27,280 Okay. So the picture of the problem is clear. The symptoms, the 131 00:08:27,280 --> 00:08:31,040 types, the grim potential costs. What's the solution 132 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:34,880 then? What's Wolf's antidote to this adaptive perception disorder? He 133 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:38,544 calls it radical AQ, adaptability intelligence. AQ, 134 00:08:38,764 --> 00:08:42,524 like IQ or EQ, but for adaptability. Exactly. It's not just reacting to 135 00:08:42,524 --> 00:08:46,365 change. It's proactively building the ability to adapt, making it a 136 00:08:46,365 --> 00:08:50,080 core competency, almost like a muscle you have to constantly exercise. Makes sense. So 137 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,200 how do you build that muscle? What are the key parts of building or maybe 138 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:57,040 rebuilding this AQ? He lays out a few critical things. First, you have to actively 139 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:00,400 challenge your existing knowledge. To question everything. Pretty much. It 140 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:04,015 requires, intellectual humility. Being willing to 141 00:09:04,015 --> 00:09:07,695 say, maybe what we know isn't true anymore. Being open to new 142 00:09:07,695 --> 00:09:11,215 data, even if it's uncomfortable or contradicts current 143 00:09:11,215 --> 00:09:14,755 beliefs. That sounds like a major cultural shift for many places. 144 00:09:15,149 --> 00:09:18,670 Admitting you might not have all the answers, that the old ways aren't sacred. It 145 00:09:18,670 --> 00:09:22,029 really is. It demands continuous learning, a healthy dose of 146 00:09:22,029 --> 00:09:25,629 skepticism about the status quo. Second, he says, 147 00:09:25,629 --> 00:09:28,529 push beyond the comfort zone. Get uncomfortable. Liberally. 148 00:09:29,345 --> 00:09:33,125 Seek out new experiences, try new approaches, experiment, 149 00:09:33,584 --> 00:09:37,345 embrace a bit of calculated risk to actually build those adaptive skills. So not just 150 00:09:37,345 --> 00:09:41,105 talking about agility, but actually doing things that require it. Learning by doing, 151 00:09:41,105 --> 00:09:44,250 essentially. Exactly. And third, and this feels crucial, 152 00:09:44,950 --> 00:09:48,250 actively seek out and listen to uncomfortable truths. 153 00:09:48,870 --> 00:09:51,850 Oh, the stuff people might be hesitant to say. Yeah. 154 00:09:52,390 --> 00:09:56,230 Foster a culture where it's okay to disagree, where critical feedback is 155 00:09:56,230 --> 00:09:59,865 actually welcomed, not punished, where leaders genuinely wanna hear 156 00:09:59,865 --> 00:10:03,385 perspectives that challenge their own views. Creating psychological safety, 157 00:10:03,385 --> 00:10:07,165 basically, so people can point out the blind spots without fear. Absolutely. 158 00:10:07,545 --> 00:10:11,305 And ultimately, Wolf says, building AQ boils down to 159 00:10:11,305 --> 00:10:15,120 constantly asking that really tough question. What if we're not as ready as 160 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:17,940 we think we are? Constant self assessment. 161 00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:22,180 Relentless improvement. Yes. A fundamental commitment to evolving, 162 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:26,160 not stagnating. Okay. So wrapping it 163 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:29,675 all up then, the big takeaway from Ira Wolf's Wolf's piece 164 00:10:30,135 --> 00:10:33,595 isn't about some monster under the bed, some external disruptor. 165 00:10:33,815 --> 00:10:37,035 No. The biggest threat, he argues, is internal. 166 00:10:37,495 --> 00:10:41,255 It's that, that fantasy, the fantasy that we've already adapted 167 00:10:41,255 --> 00:10:44,960 enough. That's such a vital point. It shifts the focus dramatically. It's about self 168 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:48,800 awareness, about looking inward first. Well, it really makes you think, doesn't it, about 169 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,560 your own company or places you observe. Are they truly evolving? Are they 170 00:10:52,560 --> 00:10:56,320 meeting the pace of change? Or are they just confidently narrating their own decline 171 00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:00,035 completely unaware? Yeah. Are they mistaking routine for readiness? That's the 172 00:11:00,035 --> 00:11:03,875 critical question Wolf leaves us with. Because as he says, in this age of 173 00:11:03,875 --> 00:11:07,635 nonstop change, the real risk isn't just disruption itself. It's 174 00:11:07,635 --> 00:11:11,329 the delusion that you're immune, that you're already prepared. Exactly. And, you know, 175 00:11:11,329 --> 00:11:14,769 if this whole deep dive into APD has struck a chord, if listeners are 176 00:11:14,769 --> 00:11:18,370 thinking, maybe this applies here. Wolf actually mentions a 177 00:11:18,370 --> 00:11:21,970 tool in his article, their AQ team audit. So a way to 178 00:11:21,970 --> 00:11:25,625 potentially measure this to get beyond just gut feeling? Seems like 179 00:11:25,625 --> 00:11:29,385 it. A way for organizations to try and objectively assess their actual 180 00:11:29,385 --> 00:11:33,065 adaptability intelligence, their AQ level. Interesting. A call to action 181 00:11:33,065 --> 00:11:36,745 then. Move from assumption to assessment. Yeah. So we really just encourage 182 00:11:36,745 --> 00:11:40,370 everyone listening to mull over these ideas. Think about your own experiences, 183 00:11:40,370 --> 00:11:43,750 what you see around you. Do these symptoms, these subtypes, and APD 184 00:11:44,690 --> 00:11:47,750 resonate at all? It's definitely, definitely food for thought. 185 00:11:48,450 --> 00:11:51,513 Thanks for watching Geeks, Geezers, and Googolization. 186 00:11:52,613 --> 00:11:55,913 Be sure to listen to the podcast and follow us on YouTube.