전사 🔗
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,820
>> Zach: Foreign.
2
00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:07,752
Hello, and welcome to the Green Tea Party, where we
3
00:00:07,776 --> 00:00:10,616
discuss conservative solutions to environmental problems. My name is Zach
4
00:00:10,648 --> 00:00:11,384
Torpy.
5
00:00:11,512 --> 00:00:14,200
>> Katie: I'm Katie Zachreski. Together we'll guide you through
6
00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:16,950
complex issues and provide strategies to address them. Um,
7
00:00:17,216 --> 00:00:19,384
all while remaining faithful to our conservative
8
00:00:19,432 --> 00:00:20,220
values.
9
00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:22,552
>> Zach: Trust me, it'll be a good time.
10
00:00:22,656 --> 00:00:25,512
>> Katie: Yeah, it's a party, so grab your mugs and
11
00:00:25,536 --> 00:00:26,780
we'll pour the tea.
12
00:00:28,690 --> 00:00:31,210
Carbon price this, C. Bam
13
00:00:31,290 --> 00:00:34,282
that. I don't know what's going on. If you
14
00:00:34,306 --> 00:00:37,242
feel like me anytime you check the news. Um, and Zach, you
15
00:00:37,266 --> 00:00:39,946
could probably sympathize with this. It feels like they're talking
16
00:00:39,978 --> 00:00:42,730
about something climate related and something economic,
17
00:00:42,850 --> 00:00:45,722
and the carbon price is both. And
18
00:00:45,746 --> 00:00:48,266
we've spent a lot of the last few weeks talking about
19
00:00:48,418 --> 00:00:50,842
Canadian carbon pricing and Canadian
20
00:00:50,906 --> 00:00:53,412
shenanigans and a, uh, theoretical
21
00:00:53,476 --> 00:00:56,372
carbon price and what that might look like if conservatives got
22
00:00:56,396 --> 00:00:58,600
involved. Well, ladies and gentlemen, uh, behold
23
00:00:59,260 --> 00:01:02,180
may your patriotism tangle, because
24
00:01:02,220 --> 00:01:05,060
today we're going to be talking about the American carbon price,
25
00:01:05,100 --> 00:01:07,716
which is better than the el Canadian carbon
26
00:01:07,748 --> 00:01:10,740
price just by factor of being
27
00:01:10,780 --> 00:01:13,508
American. But before we get a.
28
00:01:13,644 --> 00:01:16,564
But before we get into that, Zach, what all's been
29
00:01:16,572 --> 00:01:19,060
going on in your world lately and what's on your mind
30
00:01:19,100 --> 00:01:21,572
politically? Uh, pick a topic and run with it. I think you
31
00:01:21,596 --> 00:01:24,260
can pick, like, literally anything on earth at this
32
00:01:24,300 --> 00:01:24,932
point.
33
00:01:25,116 --> 00:01:26,724
>> Zach: Well, the Pope died, and that was sad.
34
00:01:26,772 --> 00:01:28,052
>> Katie: Yeah, the Pope died.
35
00:01:28,196 --> 00:01:31,028
>> Zach: Every time I read about the Pope in, like, history books, it's always like,
36
00:01:31,164 --> 00:01:34,132
how bad the Pope was, like, doing the Crusades and, like,
37
00:01:34,156 --> 00:01:37,124
doing all sorts of messed up. And you're like. Then you're like, ah, our Pope was kind of
38
00:01:37,132 --> 00:01:38,228
chill. He's a cool guy.
39
00:01:38,324 --> 00:01:41,076
>> Katie: You know, by all. By all things considered,
40
00:01:41,188 --> 00:01:43,800
where some popes burned people at the stake.
41
00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:46,720
Um, even without that
42
00:01:47,100 --> 00:01:49,988
outlier. Ah, in the. In the group. But Pope Francis was a pretty
43
00:01:50,004 --> 00:01:52,792
cool dude. I don't know if I've told you about this so
44
00:01:52,816 --> 00:01:55,736
far. This is literally how I reacted to the news
45
00:01:55,888 --> 00:01:58,808
when I found out. Because this whole time I've been like, no, he better not die.
46
00:01:58,824 --> 00:02:01,720
He better not die. He better not die. It's a jubilee year. It's a very
47
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:03,500
busy year. He better not go anywhere.
48
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:05,496
Well, I will tell you.
49
00:02:05,568 --> 00:02:06,232
>> Zach: Things to do.
50
00:02:06,336 --> 00:02:09,272
>> Katie: Yeah, we got things to do. Do not ruin our
51
00:02:09,456 --> 00:02:12,152
regularly scheduled programming. Do not. I have checked my
52
00:02:12,176 --> 00:02:14,776
planner and nowhere in it do we have covering a dead
53
00:02:14,808 --> 00:02:17,672
Pope. Unfortunately, God saw my planner and
54
00:02:17,696 --> 00:02:20,600
laughed because I woke up Easter Monday. Now, Holy Week
55
00:02:20,640 --> 00:02:23,588
is like the worst week in the world for somebody in Catholic you.
56
00:02:23,644 --> 00:02:26,440
Because as much as I love Holy week, you're covering 4, 000
57
00:02:26,470 --> 00:02:29,220
different events and getting, uh, a bunch of written copy out
58
00:02:29,260 --> 00:02:32,212
there and taking photos. And that's not
59
00:02:32,236 --> 00:02:35,060
even like touching on all the stuff that you're doing
60
00:02:35,100 --> 00:02:38,084
in celebration. So I was already exhausted from the
61
00:02:38,092 --> 00:02:40,852
whole week before. I Woke up at 5:30 in the
62
00:02:40,876 --> 00:02:43,828
morning because for whatever reason,
63
00:02:43,884 --> 00:02:46,692
that's the time that my body has randomly decided I need to wake up. And
64
00:02:46,716 --> 00:02:49,684
usually every time I do, I just check my phone to see what time it
65
00:02:49,692 --> 00:02:52,210
is and then go back to sleep. Well,
66
00:02:52,670 --> 00:02:55,222
Easter Monday, I made the mistake of checking my
67
00:02:55,246 --> 00:02:57,926
phone and I saw that one
68
00:02:57,998 --> 00:03:00,966
friend had tagged me in a post on Discord
69
00:03:01,078 --> 00:03:03,930
and said, do not read. So naturally,
70
00:03:04,830 --> 00:03:07,542
you already know what I did. I clicked on it. I was
71
00:03:07,566 --> 00:03:10,502
like, which of my friends is messaging me
72
00:03:10,526 --> 00:03:13,510
at 3:30 in the morning telling me not to read whatever they just found?
73
00:03:13,550 --> 00:03:16,502
And now I absolutely have to, um, and I
74
00:03:16,526 --> 00:03:19,412
opened it and I saw Pope Francis dead at 88 by
75
00:03:19,436 --> 00:03:21,988
AP news.
Load full transcript
Now, my first
76
00:03:22,044 --> 00:03:24,612
thought, which, uh, in hindsight was
77
00:03:24,716 --> 00:03:27,556
probably one of the sharpest thoughts I could have had, all things considered.
78
00:03:27,588 --> 00:03:30,196
I had literally just woken up, I was so tired
79
00:03:30,388 --> 00:03:32,880
and I was like, hm, I'm in media,
80
00:03:33,340 --> 00:03:35,400
Catholic media specifically.
81
00:03:36,060 --> 00:03:39,028
And I'm subscribed to like the wa, the New York Times.
82
00:03:39,084 --> 00:03:41,700
Anytime a president farts, I know about it three times
83
00:03:41,740 --> 00:03:44,602
over. And for whatever
84
00:03:44,666 --> 00:03:47,418
reason, I had zero notifications
85
00:03:47,514 --> 00:03:50,442
other than this person tagging me on Discord. So
86
00:03:50,466 --> 00:03:52,378
the first thing I googled at
87
00:03:52,434 --> 00:03:55,274
5:35 in the morning was Pope Francis
88
00:03:55,322 --> 00:03:58,170
dead hoax. Because I thought for sure it was like one of those,
89
00:03:58,210 --> 00:04:00,810
like, Facebook posts where it's like Morgan Freeman just died at
90
00:04:00,850 --> 00:04:03,626
69 years old or whatever. And so I was like, nah,
91
00:04:03,658 --> 00:04:06,522
he's just trolling me. This is like some boomer fodder right here. This
92
00:04:06,546 --> 00:04:09,402
is not true. And so I googled it and the first thing
93
00:04:09,426 --> 00:04:12,362
that popped up was the AP News article. And so then I googled
94
00:04:12,426 --> 00:04:15,050
AP News. Hacked. Like, my brain was like really
95
00:04:15,090 --> 00:04:17,926
running in circles trying to find a way to bring the Pope
96
00:04:17,958 --> 00:04:20,850
back to Life at 5:30 on Easter Monday.
97
00:04:21,390 --> 00:04:24,374
But, uh, alas, no, he was dead. I was just way ahead of the ball game.
98
00:04:24,462 --> 00:04:27,414
So, yeah, that's been a pretty hellish week now,
99
00:04:27,502 --> 00:04:30,250
just putting up with that. Well, I say it like, I'm,
100
00:04:30,250 --> 00:04:33,222
um, You know, I got my emergency letter summoning me to the
101
00:04:33,246 --> 00:04:36,102
Vatican now. It's just like, kind of stressful because you can tell that
102
00:04:36,126 --> 00:04:38,710
everybody who's Catholic right now is really apprehensive about, you
103
00:04:38,750 --> 00:04:41,622
know, what do the next few weeks look like? Who are
104
00:04:41,646 --> 00:04:44,422
they going to pick? Is who they're going to pick. For me in particular, my
105
00:04:44,446 --> 00:04:47,402
concern is, are they going to be as big of an environmentalist as Pope Francis?
106
00:04:47,446 --> 00:04:50,114
This was. Stay tuned in the next coming weeks. Free.
107
00:04:50,282 --> 00:04:53,218
Yeah, yeah, I know. As much as I want to have my hopes
108
00:04:53,234 --> 00:04:56,146
up. Unlikely. Stay tuned over the next couple of weeks for a
109
00:04:56,218 --> 00:04:59,106
Katie specific episode where I talk all about
110
00:04:59,178 --> 00:05:02,066
Pope,
uh, Francis, creation, care, legacy, and what that means for
111
00:05:02,138 --> 00:05:05,122
other religious communities, not just Catholics. But. Yeah. And
112
00:05:05,146 --> 00:05:08,114
I read a report this morning from one of the cardinals who was like, well, none of
113
00:05:08,122 --> 00:05:11,010
us really know each other, so it's probably going to be a pretty long conclave
114
00:05:11,090 --> 00:05:14,034
to elect the next pope. They're normally two to three weeks, but this one's probably going
115
00:05:14,042 --> 00:05:16,932
to be quite a bit longer. So I have no idea. I'm just on
116
00:05:16,956 --> 00:05:19,876
pins and needles waiting for the moment that I need to. Yeah.
117
00:05:19,908 --> 00:05:22,836
Immediately write a statement, because I'm not on the Vatican's Rolodex,
118
00:05:22,868 --> 00:05:24,880
and nor should I be. I'm not that important.
119
00:05:25,260 --> 00:05:28,148
>> Zach: I've. I have two funny notes to add into this.
120
00:05:28,204 --> 00:05:28,644
>> Katie: I'm ready.
121
00:05:28,692 --> 00:05:29,600
Let's hear it.
122
00:05:30,620 --> 00:05:33,492
>> Zach: First one kind of funny. His last big meeting was with
123
00:05:33,516 --> 00:05:34,516
J.D. vance.
124
00:05:34,708 --> 00:05:35,508
>> Katie: Yeah.
125
00:05:35,684 --> 00:05:37,572
>> Zach: Look around. Like, oops, what did I do?
126
00:05:37,676 --> 00:05:40,628
>> Katie: I have a running theory that J.D. vance flew back
127
00:05:40,684 --> 00:05:43,524
to the White House with a soul orb in his briefcase
128
00:05:43,572 --> 00:05:46,252
that the Pope was, like, banging on the inside of, trying to get
129
00:05:46,276 --> 00:05:49,100
out m. Because he was like, I'm praying for your health,
130
00:05:49,140 --> 00:05:52,140
Pope Francis. And my immediate question was, for or against?
131
00:05:52,260 --> 00:05:55,116
I guess we know the answer now. Um, so,
132
00:05:55,188 --> 00:05:57,850
yeah, J.D. vance got the soul cube. Um,
133
00:05:58,900 --> 00:06:01,390
not who I had my money on. Um,
134
00:06:01,940 --> 00:06:04,520
so what. What was your other
135
00:06:05,460 --> 00:06:06,640
anecdote?
136
00:06:08,580 --> 00:06:11,190
>> Zach: The level of marketing
137
00:06:11,380 --> 00:06:11,874
done.
138
00:06:11,962 --> 00:06:12,322
>> Katie: Yeah.
139
00:06:12,386 --> 00:06:14,190
>> Zach: For the movie Conclave Now.
140
00:06:14,570 --> 00:06:15,090
>> Katie: Yeah.
141
00:06:15,170 --> 00:06:16,510
>> Zach: Like, they timed that.
142
00:06:16,970 --> 00:06:19,842
>> Katie: I was about to say. I think they really waited till he
143
00:06:19,866 --> 00:06:22,754
was, like, as old as you could possibly get, and then was like, hey, we
144
00:06:22,762 --> 00:06:24,750
got a movie you guys might want to watch.
145
00:06:25,130 --> 00:06:27,618
>> Zach: They're like pneumonia. Put this, put that.
146
00:06:27,674 --> 00:06:30,642
>> Katie: Yeah. The moment Pope Francis coughed, they were like, do we
147
00:06:30,666 --> 00:06:33,570
have the movie for you? Which I've heard has
148
00:06:33,610 --> 00:06:36,610
been very good. Like, I've read Catholic media reviews, and I've read
149
00:06:36,650 --> 00:06:39,568
secular media reviews, and they've all said that it was a really good movie.
150
00:06:39,674 --> 00:06:42,468
I mean, no joke. I think it won an Oscar. So, yeah,
151
00:06:42,484 --> 00:06:45,396
I'm definitely gonna check it out, especially because it's super.
152
00:06:45,468 --> 00:06:48,452
I think I'll check it out after we get a new Pope. Because, like, right now
153
00:06:48,476 --> 00:06:51,252
I'm like, so anxious, I don't even want to consume media related to
154
00:06:51,276 --> 00:06:52,084
anything like that.
155
00:06:52,172 --> 00:06:54,880
So, yeah, also horrible week for.
156
00:06:55,580 --> 00:06:58,516
Not weak, but horrible year for it to happen. Not that there's
157
00:06:58,548 --> 00:07:01,460
ever a good year for the Pope to die, but. And I
158
00:07:01,500 --> 00:07:04,372
realized that, like, not a lot of non Catholics know about this because this has
159
00:07:04,396 --> 00:07:07,090
been my whole world for like a long time
160
00:07:07,130 --> 00:07:10,130
now. But this year in particular was a
161
00:07:10,170 --> 00:07:12,738
jubilee year, which only happens every
162
00:07:12,794 --> 00:07:13,858
25 years.
163
00:07:13,994 --> 00:07:15,074
>> Zach: What's a jubilee?
164
00:07:15,202 --> 00:07:18,082
>> Katie: So a jubilee year is like, every 25
165
00:07:18,106 --> 00:07:21,042
years, there's a big celebration in the church. They like, come up with a
166
00:07:21,066 --> 00:07:23,922
theme, they open the jubilee doors in Rome. Like,
167
00:07:23,946 --> 00:07:26,930
it's a huge event. Like, the Pope opens them. Um, and then
168
00:07:26,970 --> 00:07:29,762
like, whatever the theme is for that year, Catholics all
169
00:07:29,786 --> 00:07:32,674
across the world, like, participate in the theme. So
170
00:07:32,682 --> 00:07:35,650
this year it's Pilgrims of Hope. And so a lot of people
171
00:07:35,690 --> 00:07:38,578
were taking pilgrimages to Rome. I actually knew a group that was in
172
00:07:38,634 --> 00:07:41,602
Rome this past week while the Pope's funeral and
173
00:07:41,626 --> 00:07:44,322
everything was going on. They got there like their plane
174
00:07:44,386 --> 00:07:47,362
landed and then they were given the announcement that the Pope had died to let
175
00:07:47,386 --> 00:07:50,098
you know, like, how the timing went for them.
176
00:07:50,234 --> 00:07:53,122
But so, yeah, so, so
177
00:07:53,146 --> 00:07:56,146
my next question would have been, okay, are the rest of the flights discounted
178
00:07:56,258 --> 00:07:58,914
if, like, half of what we came here for is no longer
179
00:07:58,962 --> 00:08:01,836
valid? Um, but who knows? Maybe
180
00:08:01,868 --> 00:08:04,540
they would have charged it more because that's like a rare event. I don't know.
181
00:08:04,660 --> 00:08:07,660
But it's like, it was a huge
year for
182
00:08:07,700 --> 00:08:10,652
celebrating. Um, still is, obviously. I
183
00:08:10,676 --> 00:08:13,600
mean, now it's just got a little bit of a hiccup in it. Um,
184
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,572
but there were also a bunch of other, like, environmental
185
00:08:16,636 --> 00:08:19,276
specific celebrations going on. So it was like the 10th
186
00:08:19,308 --> 00:08:22,092
anniversary of the. I keep saying was. It
187
00:08:22,116 --> 00:08:24,700
still is. Even in spite of the pro being dead, we're still
188
00:08:24,740 --> 00:08:27,342
celebrating things. It's just a stranger
189
00:08:27,406 --> 00:08:30,382
lens through which we're celebrating. I know I'm in
190
00:08:30,406 --> 00:08:33,038
more like it's. No, no more jubilee year. Jubilee. You're
191
00:08:33,054 --> 00:08:35,790
canceled. Um, yeah, no, it's all canceled. No church
192
00:08:35,870 --> 00:08:38,814
till 2026. But, um, yeah, so we
193
00:08:38,822 --> 00:08:41,390
were like, also celebrating the 10 year anniversary of his
194
00:08:41,430 --> 00:08:43,982
encyclical about caring for creation.
195
00:08:44,126 --> 00:08:47,102
It's the 800th anniversary of St. Francis's
196
00:08:47,166 --> 00:08:49,630
who's like, the big environmental site is a
197
00:08:49,670 --> 00:08:52,528
canticle of creation. So I mean, it was just like,
198
00:08:52,654 --> 00:08:55,612
if there, there could not have been a worse year for
199
00:08:55,636 --> 00:08:58,556
a Pope to die. No disrespect, Papa
200
00:08:58,588 --> 00:09:01,388
Frank. But, uh, yeah, no, because now,
201
00:09:01,444 --> 00:09:04,140
like, all of the language around these things are having to be
202
00:09:04,180 --> 00:09:07,180
like. I'll put it like this. After getting some
203
00:09:07,220 --> 00:09:09,980
statements out after the Pope's death a week ago
204
00:09:10,020 --> 00:09:12,956
today, I was like, okay, now I get to rewrite everything
205
00:09:13,028 --> 00:09:15,516
I've written for the last five
206
00:09:15,588 --> 00:09:18,220
months to account for.
207
00:09:18,340 --> 00:09:21,292
Hi. We can't celebrate that much. The Pope is dead. So,
208
00:09:21,316 --> 00:09:24,288
yeah, pray for all your friends who are not only Catholic, but who are
209
00:09:24,404 --> 00:09:27,176
Catholic media, because, uh, we're going to join Pope
210
00:09:27,208 --> 00:09:29,992
Francis here soon if this, if this stuff doesn't stop all
211
00:09:30,016 --> 00:09:32,856
that to go down the convoluted rabbit hole of the carbon
212
00:09:32,888 --> 00:09:33,224
price.
213
00:09:33,312 --> 00:09:35,976
All right, now that our 3 to 5 minute
214
00:09:36,008 --> 00:09:38,840
banter has gone about 10 minutes long, let me tell
215
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:41,736
you all about the carbon price. So Zach's
216
00:09:41,768 --> 00:09:44,696
facts have been packed full of Canadian
217
00:09:44,728 --> 00:09:47,704
carbon pricing stats. And I'm sure you're ready to hear, to smell a little
218
00:09:47,712 --> 00:09:50,296
bit of capitalistic democratic freedom
219
00:09:50,328 --> 00:09:53,152
again. So, yeah, uh, yeah, a little bit of
220
00:09:53,176 --> 00:09:55,740
American exceptionalism. Can you, can you hear,
221
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,072
can you see the flag waving behind me in your head? So
222
00:09:59,096 --> 00:10:01,840
let's talk about the American carbon price. So I was the first
223
00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:04,720
introduced to the American carbon price through a little
224
00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:07,712
old organization that we've mentioned just a couple times on this
225
00:10:07,736 --> 00:10:10,592
show called Citizens Climate Lobby. And, um, for the
226
00:10:10,616 --> 00:10:13,456
longest, Citizens Climate Lobby has been known as the carbon
227
00:10:13,488 --> 00:10:16,224
price people, also known as the carbon fee and dividend
228
00:10:16,272 --> 00:10:18,920
people. So while I think Zach and I have
229
00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:21,832
been surrounded by this language and these people and
230
00:10:21,856 --> 00:10:24,376
these actors, and we're familiar with it and have been for
231
00:10:24,448 --> 00:10:27,320
years, I realize that a lot of this might
232
00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:30,328
sound like Greek to a lot of y'all. So I'm
233
00:10:30,344 --> 00:10:33,160
going to attempt to deconstruct this big
234
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:36,104
picture model and kind of paint an image of what a
235
00:10:36,112 --> 00:10:38,984
carbon price, an American carbon price, at least is, uh, compared
236
00:10:39,032 --> 00:10:41,800
to its Canadian counterpart and some of the other
237
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:44,840
mechanisms that take place within the American carbon pricing,
238
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:47,912
I guess, picturesque frame. So this is a
239
00:10:47,936 --> 00:10:50,888
carbon fee and dividend model designed to address
240
00:10:50,944 --> 00:10:53,816
climate change by encouraging businesses to reduce their carbon
241
00:10:53,848 --> 00:10:56,840
emissions, notably by issuing them a fine or
242
00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:59,768
a fee for a certain amount of carbon pollution.
243
00:10:59,864 --> 00:11:02,648
So the idea is to impose a price on carbon
244
00:11:02,664 --> 00:11:05,160
emissions, which incentivizes companies and
245
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:08,152
individuals to switch to cleaner, more sustainable practices
246
00:11:08,216 --> 00:11:11,196
and technologies. Um, and it's, it's more effective
247
00:11:11,228 --> 00:11:13,852
than a carbon cap and trade system, which just kind of lets you,
248
00:11:13,876 --> 00:11:16,620
like, buy and sell your pollution. I mean,
249
00:11:16,660 --> 00:11:19,276
I'm not a big fan of cap and trade. And we could have a Whole
250
00:11:19,308 --> 00:11:22,092
episode just on that. I think we have in the past on some of the
251
00:11:22,116 --> 00:11:24,796
drawbacks of the cap and trade system. The American
252
00:11:24,868 --> 00:11:27,772
carbon price is structured and designed to avoid
253
00:11:27,836 --> 00:11:30,748
some of those loopholes that are provided in the cap and
254
00:11:30,804 --> 00:11:33,756
trade system. So let's talk a little bit more about the carbon fee
255
00:11:33,788 --> 00:11:36,524
and dividend model, AKA that American carbon
256
00:11:36,572 --> 00:11:39,342
price. So I'll be
257
00:11:39,366 --> 00:11:41,982
talking primarily about the model that's been proposed by
258
00:11:42,006 --> 00:11:44,570
CCL because quite frankly, it's gotten the most,
259
00:11:45,030 --> 00:11:47,806
I think, legislative push behind it. They've been
260
00:11:47,878 --> 00:11:50,814
going at that, at this for 15 years. As I
261
00:11:50,822 --> 00:11:53,662
said, they're the carbon pricing people. If you're working on a
262
00:11:53,686 --> 00:11:56,526
carbon price or a carbon fee and dividend, you're calling CCL
263
00:11:56,558 --> 00:11:59,550
to talk about it. Uh, so a lot of what I talk about is
264
00:11:59,590 --> 00:12:02,542
going to largely be taken by a lot of the narrative that CCL has
265
00:12:02,566 --> 00:12:05,484
set because they are the carbon pricing people. So
266
00:12:05,492 --> 00:12:07,660
their carbon price in particular, which is the most
267
00:12:07,700 --> 00:12:10,572
popularly, as far as I'm concerned, as
268
00:12:10,596 --> 00:12:13,372
far as I know of, uh, most popularly accepted
269
00:12:13,436 --> 00:12:16,092
variant of the American carbon pricing model
270
00:12:16,236 --> 00:12:19,036
revolves around the concept of a carbon fee
271
00:12:19,148 --> 00:12:22,092
that is placed on fossil fuels. So namely
272
00:12:22,156 --> 00:12:25,036
based on the amount of carbon dioxide CO2 emissions
273
00:12:25,068 --> 00:12:28,012
that a company or an organization produces. So here
274
00:12:28,036 --> 00:12:30,796
are some of the key components of that carbon fee and dividend
275
00:12:30,828 --> 00:12:33,712
model. So there's the carbon fee. So a fee would
276
00:12:33,736 --> 00:12:36,560
be levied on fossil fuels based on the
277
00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:39,520
CO2 emissions they produce when burned. So this
278
00:12:39,560 --> 00:12:42,560
fee starts at a fixed price per ton of
279
00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:44,960
CO2 emissions and increases
280
00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,824
annually. So companies and organizations have the
281
00:12:47,832 --> 00:12:50,832
opportunity to pay the fee and to stop polluting or they're just
282
00:12:50,856 --> 00:12:53,536
going to get charged more and more and more every single
283
00:12:53,568 --> 00:12:56,208
year. So the idea is that the fee will
284
00:12:56,264 --> 00:12:58,846
rise gradually over time to provide
285
00:12:58,918 --> 00:13:01,822
businesses and consumers with the incentives and with
286
00:13:02,006 --> 00:13:04,846
a respectable amount of time, a feasible amount of time
287
00:13:04,918 --> 00:13:07,582
to switch to cleaner alternatives. So the fee is
288
00:13:07,606 --> 00:13:10,062
applied at the point of entry, which could be at the
289
00:13:10,086 --> 00:13:12,958
wellhead, the port of entry, uh, or other
290
00:13:13,014 --> 00:13:16,014
similar places where, where fossil fuels officially enter the
291
00:13:16,022 --> 00:13:18,942
economy. So that's one part of this carbon fee and
292
00:13:18,966 --> 00:13:21,838
dividend model that is known as the carbon price. Another
293
00:13:21,894 --> 00:13:24,546
component is the carbon dividend portion
294
00:13:24,638 --> 00:13:27,322
portion. So the money raised from the
295
00:13:27,346 --> 00:13:29,978
carbon fee levied against polluting companies
296
00:13:30,114 --> 00:13:33,002
would then be returned to American households in the form
297
00:13:33,026 --> 00:13:35,754
of a dividend. So this means that the
298
00:13:35,762 --> 00:13:38,634
revenue generated from the carbon fee would be distributed
299
00:13:38,682 --> 00:13:41,450
evenly to all legal US residents
300
00:13:41,530 --> 00:13:44,314
as a rebate or a check, with priority
301
00:13:44,362 --> 00:13:47,082
given to lower and middle income class American
302
00:13:47,186 --> 00:13:50,010
families. So the, the intention is that the dividend would help
303
00:13:50,050 --> 00:13:52,748
offset any higher costs that
304
00:13:52,804 --> 00:13:55,708
consumers might face as businesses pass on the price of
305
00:13:55,764 --> 00:13:58,332
carbon fee to their customers.
306
00:13:58,476 --> 00:14:00,972
As you know, the price of things changes to
307
00:14:00,996 --> 00:14:03,980
accommodate for this carbon fee and dividend. It is a way to
308
00:14:04,020 --> 00:14:06,236
sure that ensure that the policy is
309
00:14:06,388 --> 00:14:09,276
progressive and that it is not regressive. Thank
310
00:14:09,308 --> 00:14:12,236
you, Zach. Uh, Zach, see you. You know, numbers
311
00:14:12,268 --> 00:14:14,956
and words. So what do I even do for a living?
312
00:14:15,148 --> 00:14:18,014
>> Zach: Yeah, so like when. So the richer people will be flying
313
00:14:18,062 --> 00:14:20,910
more, spending more on high influence goods or high
314
00:14:20,950 --> 00:14:23,950
carbon intensity goods and they'll pay more
315
00:14:23,990 --> 00:14:26,942
into it, but it'll be. The dividend will be
316
00:14:26,966 --> 00:14:29,790
received equally so that people who are
317
00:14:29,830 --> 00:14:32,750
using less still get. They get more
318
00:14:32,790 --> 00:14:33,790
than they put in.
319
00:14:33,910 --> 00:14:34,638
>> Katie: Absolutely.
320
00:14:34,734 --> 00:14:36,622
>> Zach: People who have lower incomes will get more.
321
00:14:36,726 --> 00:14:39,662
>> Katie: Bingo. Which is something that we had talked about a little bit, I think,
322
00:14:39,686 --> 00:14:42,494
rubbing Canadians the wrong way in the way that the uh, Canadian
323
00:14:42,542 --> 00:14:45,526
carbon price was enacted and that where the American
324
00:14:45,598 --> 00:14:48,534
carbon price is set up so that immediately the moment
325
00:14:48,582 --> 00:14:51,574
that the product enters the market,
it is set up in a way
326
00:14:51,662 --> 00:14:54,646
so that it will ultimately benefit low income
327
00:14:54,758 --> 00:14:57,414
and middle class families. Whereas with the Canadian
328
00:14:57,462 --> 00:15:00,406
carbon price you had a lot of people immediately feeling the pain
329
00:15:00,438 --> 00:15:03,302
at the pump and then not feeling like the price that
330
00:15:03,326 --> 00:15:06,310
they got on the rebate justified just how much
331
00:15:06,350 --> 00:15:09,302
they were having to pay more frequently at the pump. Which I think in
332
00:15:09,326 --> 00:15:12,182
some cases might very well be the case. We talked a little bit about that
333
00:15:12,206 --> 00:15:15,022
in that episode. So definitely go, go check out
334
00:15:15,046 --> 00:15:18,046
Zach's Canadian carbon pricing episode for a little bit of a refresher. Sorry
335
00:15:18,078 --> 00:15:18,958
to cut you off, Zach.
336
00:15:19,054 --> 00:15:21,790
>> Zach: Yeah, I think we said that they were going to be paying an extra like 38
337
00:15:21,830 --> 00:15:23,530
cents per gallon, which is
338
00:15:24,870 --> 00:15:27,230
pretty mhm. Hefty if you people here would go.
339
00:15:27,270 --> 00:15:29,710
>> Katie: Absolutely insane if you said that today.
340
00:15:29,830 --> 00:15:32,702
So yeah, and for us to be like one of the crazier
341
00:15:32,766 --> 00:15:35,630
countries and for Canada to be like one of the
342
00:15:35,670 --> 00:15:38,494
less crazy countries, if they reacted the way that they did,
343
00:15:38,582 --> 00:15:41,294
you can probably imagine how that would go over here and that it
344
00:15:41,302 --> 00:15:43,982
wouldn't. So yeah, excellent point, Zach. So the
345
00:15:44,006 --> 00:15:46,762
primary goal of this carbon, the
346
00:15:46,786 --> 00:15:49,738
American carbon pricing model is to encourage businesses
347
00:15:49,754 --> 00:15:52,618
and individuals to reduce carbon emissions by
348
00:15:52,674 --> 00:15:55,498
making fossil fuels more expensive, but and by
349
00:15:55,554 --> 00:15:58,298
incentivizing cleaner energy sources, which means that over
350
00:15:58,354 --> 00:16:01,290
time m the increasing price on carbon should
351
00:16:01,330 --> 00:16:04,090
lead to a significant reduction in the emissions and
352
00:16:04,130 --> 00:16:06,154
drive innovation in the renewable energy
353
00:16:06,242 --> 00:16:07,150
technologies.
354
00:16:07,490 --> 00:16:10,490
So obviously there's a second component of this
355
00:16:10,530 --> 00:16:13,450
that we haven't talked about a lot recently. But we have
356
00:16:13,490 --> 00:16:16,142
talked a lot about it in the past, and it's worth a
357
00:16:16,166 --> 00:16:18,526
refresher. And that's the carbon border adjustment
358
00:16:18,558 --> 00:16:21,470
mechanism, also called a cbam.
359
00:16:21,610 --> 00:16:24,318
Uh, you've probably heard C bands come up a lot
360
00:16:24,374 --> 00:16:27,182
lately in recent news. Zach, you and I were just talking here a few
361
00:16:27,206 --> 00:16:30,126
minutes ago about. I believe it was Senator Lindsey
362
00:16:30,158 --> 00:16:32,702
Graham and. Oh, please help me. I think he's from
363
00:16:32,806 --> 00:16:33,262
Louisiana.
364
00:16:33,326 --> 00:16:35,690
>> Zach: Yes, from Louisiana, yes, yes.
365
00:16:35,690 --> 00:16:38,542
>> Katie: Uh, and both of them are working on some legislation related to that
366
00:16:38,566 --> 00:16:41,508
right now. Did you have a little more information on that? I didn't get a chance to
367
00:16:41,614 --> 00:16:43,540
dive too deeply into that here.
368
00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:46,180
>> Zach: I mean, they're still trying to get the
369
00:16:46,480 --> 00:16:49,144
verbiage built out. It's still in
370
00:16:49,232 --> 00:16:52,088
committee, I believe, so it's not coming
371
00:16:52,144 --> 00:16:55,016
out yet. EU does have. They have their own,
372
00:16:55,060 --> 00:16:57,736
uh, carbon border adjustment mechanism that they are implementing
373
00:16:57,848 --> 00:17:00,712
now. Not sure when it's gonna be fully implemented, but we
374
00:17:00,736 --> 00:17:03,736
have to be aware that we're gonna have to be paying a carbon
375
00:17:03,848 --> 00:17:06,632
adjustment for imports into or
376
00:17:06,656 --> 00:17:08,020
exports into Europe.
377
00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,088
So this is a policy that's
378
00:17:12,104 --> 00:17:15,064
being implemented in other countries. And I think it's a policy that could
379
00:17:15,072 --> 00:17:17,912
be really effective for. We know
380
00:17:17,936 --> 00:17:19,760
Trump's favorite word is tariff, so.
381
00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:20,040
>> Katie: Huh.
382
00:17:20,040 --> 00:17:22,904
>> Zach: I think it could be an effective way to levy a tariff
383
00:17:22,952 --> 00:17:25,220
with a goal and a point.
384
00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:28,100
Because a lot of Trump's tariffs feel very,
385
00:17:28,830 --> 00:17:31,784
um. I don't know, they feel very off the cuff,
386
00:17:31,832 --> 00:17:34,066
not calculated to meet.
387
00:17:34,218 --> 00:17:37,186
>> Katie: Countries are confused with not. Not. Not number oriented
388
00:17:37,218 --> 00:17:38,338
at all, it seems like.
389
00:17:38,394 --> 00:17:41,234
>> Zach: Yeah. So this would give countries be like, we are
390
00:17:41,242 --> 00:17:44,146
putting this tariff on you for this reason because you are polluting
391
00:17:44,178 --> 00:17:46,850
this much more than we do. And this would give that country
392
00:17:46,890 --> 00:17:49,630
incentive to pollute less. It would also
393
00:17:49,930 --> 00:17:52,802
protect American companies by adding this
394
00:17:52,826 --> 00:17:55,650
additional pollution fee to cover all the
395
00:17:55,690 --> 00:17:58,626
pollution that China has. Vietnam, that don't
396
00:17:58,658 --> 00:18:01,602
have the same environmental requirements that the US does in protecting
397
00:18:01,666 --> 00:18:04,520
our environment. So it'll sort of. It'll level
398
00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:05,700
out the playing field.
399
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,256
>> Katie: Absolutely. And obviously, it would go without
400
00:18:09,328 --> 00:18:11,816
saying that it's exciting any
401
00:18:11,968 --> 00:18:14,280
time that we're talking about this, that two
402
00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:17,112
conservatives, particularly from the south, would
403
00:18:17,136 --> 00:18:19,992
be investigating legislation to make this a
404
00:18:20,016 --> 00:18:22,920
reality. But that's exactly what's going on. And it's even
405
00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:25,528
bigger right now, I think, because it's under a Trump
406
00:18:25,584 --> 00:18:28,552
presidency. So I think that this shows that even when all the
407
00:18:28,576 --> 00:18:31,032
odds would be stacked against environmentalists and
408
00:18:31,056 --> 00:18:33,856
conservatives, lo and behold, the common sense
409
00:18:33,888 --> 00:18:36,688
appears to be prevailing. Knock, uh, on wood for that. But
410
00:18:36,744 --> 00:18:39,456
clearly, that indicates, I think, that this
411
00:18:39,608 --> 00:18:41,180
is a way of
412
00:18:42,280 --> 00:18:45,040
Tackling an environmental issue in a way that's so
413
00:18:45,080 --> 00:18:47,600
economically feasible that you've got the party that
414
00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,592
touts economic feasibility investigating it. Uh, so
415
00:18:50,616 --> 00:18:52,896
there's clearly something of meat and substance here,
416
00:18:52,968 --> 00:18:55,472
particularly when it comes to protecting ourselves in our
417
00:18:55,496 --> 00:18:58,352
market against the EU and even countries like
418
00:18:58,376 --> 00:19:01,312
Russia and China, which is one of the biggest compelling arguments for a
419
00:19:01,336 --> 00:19:04,044
carbon border adjustment mechanism. But we'll get more into that here in a
420
00:19:04,052 --> 00:19:04,524
minute.
421
00:19:04,652 --> 00:19:07,532
So let's talk a little bit more about a carbon border adjustment mechanism in
422
00:19:07,556 --> 00:19:10,412
general. So a CBAM is the idea. It's an
423
00:19:10,436 --> 00:19:13,180
idea, pardon me, that would complement the carbon price. It
424
00:19:13,220 --> 00:19:15,628
specifically addresses international trade
425
00:19:15,684 --> 00:19:18,524
concerns. So essentially, a CBAM aims to
426
00:19:18,532 --> 00:19:21,308
prevent what is known as carbon leakage, where
427
00:19:21,364 --> 00:19:24,204
businesses move production to countries with less stringent
428
00:19:24,252 --> 00:19:26,764
carbon regulations. So a CBM
429
00:19:26,812 --> 00:19:29,756
ensures that imports into the US are subject
430
00:19:29,788 --> 00:19:32,788
to the same carbon pricing mechanisms as domestic goods.
431
00:19:32,924 --> 00:19:35,732
So this helps to level the playing field. Exactly as you
432
00:19:35,756 --> 00:19:38,740
said, Zach, um, between US manufacturers who
433
00:19:38,780 --> 00:19:41,780
face the carbon fee and foreign competitors who may
434
00:19:41,820 --> 00:19:44,772
not have to pay such a price for their emissions. So
435
00:19:44,796 --> 00:19:47,540
the way that it works is that a carbon tariff,
436
00:19:47,620 --> 00:19:50,452
that fabulous little T word you just mentioned, Zach,
437
00:19:50,596 --> 00:19:53,396
or adjustment, is imposed on imported
438
00:19:53,428 --> 00:19:56,212
goods based on their carbon content. So that means that
439
00:19:56,236 --> 00:19:58,806
products like steel, cement,
440
00:19:58,988 --> 00:20:01,842
other industrial goods that are super carbon intensive
441
00:20:01,906 --> 00:20:04,866
in their manufacturing will have their emissions priced
442
00:20:04,898 --> 00:20:07,490
accordingly. So that tariff will be
443
00:20:07,530 --> 00:20:10,002
calculated based on the carbon emissions associated with the
444
00:20:10,026 --> 00:20:12,642
production of that good in the country of
445
00:20:12,666 --> 00:20:15,362
origin. And if the country of origin doesn't have an
446
00:20:15,386 --> 00:20:17,954
equivalent carbon pricing system or less stringent
447
00:20:18,002 --> 00:20:20,850
regulations, then the tariff would be higher in order
448
00:20:20,890 --> 00:20:23,698
to compensate for this disparity. So
449
00:20:23,754 --> 00:20:26,612
one of the key objectives of a CBAM
450
00:20:26,746 --> 00:20:29,744
is to encourage other countries to adopt similar
451
00:20:29,832 --> 00:20:32,576
carbon pricing policies in order to reduce the risk
452
00:20:32,648 --> 00:20:35,632
of carbon leakage. And it also aims to
453
00:20:35,736 --> 00:20:37,984
push global trade towards more sustainable
454
00:20:38,032 --> 00:20:41,024
practices. So obviously, the CBAM would need
455
00:20:41,032 --> 00:20:43,408
to comply with international trade rules,
456
00:20:43,504 --> 00:20:46,210
particularly regulations based on, set, uh,
457
00:20:46,376 --> 00:20:49,312
up by the World Trade Organization. So obviously a
458
00:20:49,336 --> 00:20:52,286
CBAM right out of the gate has to be set up in a way that,
459
00:20:52,368 --> 00:20:54,866
that's fair and transparent to all players
460
00:20:54,938 --> 00:20:57,602
involved. So we've talked a lot about the economics of
461
00:20:57,626 --> 00:21:00,354
it. Let's talk, um, just, uh, a fraction about the
462
00:21:00,362 --> 00:21:03,330
environmental impact. You're probably picking up a lot of what we're putting down
463
00:21:03,370 --> 00:21:06,354
reading in between the lines here anyway. So the goal of
464
00:21:06,362 --> 00:21:08,962
the CBAM is to help reduce global
465
00:21:09,066 --> 00:21:11,666
carbon emissions by ensuring that international
466
00:21:11,818 --> 00:21:14,322
trade doesn't undermine domestic climate
467
00:21:14,386 --> 00:21:17,106
policies. It seals that loophole. That's, again,
468
00:21:17,178 --> 00:21:20,146
very apparent. In a lot of cap and trade systems where it's okay,
469
00:21:20,178 --> 00:21:23,072
well then I'll just buy it either through a third party in
470
00:21:23,096 --> 00:21:25,984
another country or I'll just have all my stuff done there. So
471
00:21:25,992 --> 00:21:28,928
it, it actively seeks to combat that from the jump.
472
00:21:29,024 --> 00:21:31,968
If it works, a CBAM can encourage other countries
473
00:21:32,024 --> 00:21:34,944
to adopt stronger climate policies or face economic
474
00:21:35,032 --> 00:21:37,488
penalties. So obviously there's been a lot of talk about
475
00:21:37,544 --> 00:21:40,100
CBAMs in recent years, particularly
476
00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:43,120
following the beginning of the war in
477
00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:46,176
Ukraine, the Russian Ukraine war. No telling
478
00:21:46,208 --> 00:21:48,144
what they're going to call that in the history books. No telling.
479
00:21:48,192 --> 00:21:50,272
>> Zach: No, but I think jokes to myself.
480
00:21:50,416 --> 00:21:53,344
>> Katie: Yeah, yeah, yeah, don't get us canceled
481
00:21:53,392 --> 00:21:56,160
any more than we already are eligible to be canceled just
482
00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:59,120
by nature of existing. But I think that that's when a lot of people
483
00:21:59,160 --> 00:22:02,112
started to investigate the feasibility of a CBAM as
484
00:22:02,136 --> 00:22:05,090
well as a carbon price in general. Because a lot of people realize, hmm hm.
485
00:22:05,090 --> 00:22:07,968
When you put your energy control in the hands
486
00:22:07,984 --> 00:22:10,496
of a dictator, you're at the mercy of a crazy
487
00:22:10,528 --> 00:22:13,472
dictator who can overnight completely change
488
00:22:13,576 --> 00:22:16,302
your fuel supply and pricing and
489
00:22:16,326 --> 00:22:19,022
storage and everything. So I know that us here in the US
490
00:22:19,126 --> 00:22:22,014
we began to look more closely at that. I began hearing
491
00:22:22,062 --> 00:22:24,990
more frequently about CBAMs following Russia's invasion of
492
00:22:25,030 --> 00:22:27,854
Ukraine as more of a national
493
00:22:27,942 --> 00:22:30,750
defense mechanism when it comes to economic policy and
494
00:22:30,790 --> 00:22:33,678
trade. Zach, what are your thoughts on that? Have you
495
00:22:33,734 --> 00:22:36,414
personally noticed an uptick since the Russia Ukraine
496
00:22:36,462 --> 00:22:39,326
war of folks Talking more about CBAMs and carbon
497
00:22:39,358 --> 00:22:41,092
pricing a little more seriously?
498
00:22:41,286 --> 00:22:43,992
>> Zach: It seems like it's gained some traction I think, especially with the
499
00:22:44,016 --> 00:22:46,840
EU implementing theirs, that we're gonna have to get
500
00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:49,672
more serious about our carbon emissions and how
501
00:22:49,696 --> 00:22:52,552
they're being traded around the world. I think it, I think
502
00:22:52,576 --> 00:22:55,432
it really could be useful as a way for, to
503
00:22:55,456 --> 00:22:58,392
form more of a natural national security blanket around the
504
00:22:58,416 --> 00:23:01,320
US and sort of give
505
00:23:01,360 --> 00:23:04,232
a reason to home to bring
manufacturing
506
00:23:04,296 --> 00:23:06,712
back home. And it'll give a more stable,
507
00:23:06,776 --> 00:23:09,746
predictable uh, tariff that won't be
508
00:23:09,898 --> 00:23:12,354
because right now we have the very unpredictable
509
00:23:12,482 --> 00:23:14,786
90 days. Maybe it's on, maybe it's off again.
510
00:23:14,938 --> 00:23:17,778
>> Katie: Right. Or just overnight depending on what
511
00:23:17,834 --> 00:23:20,690
the yeah country on the receiving end
512
00:23:20,730 --> 00:23:21,074
says.
513
00:23:21,162 --> 00:23:23,778
>> Zach: So, so companies aren't going to build
514
00:23:23,834 --> 00:23:26,834
a fifty hundred million dollar
515
00:23:26,962 --> 00:23:29,922
production facility when they don't, when they think the
516
00:23:29,946 --> 00:23:32,498
rules might change in a week or two and they might be able to go back to their
517
00:23:32,554 --> 00:23:35,538
Mexico facility, Vietnamese facility. So
518
00:23:35,594 --> 00:23:37,990
something that's a little more consistent and uh,
519
00:23:37,990 --> 00:23:40,642
planned forward so that companies know how to project their
520
00:23:40,666 --> 00:23:43,538
profits, project their costs and can build out.
521
00:23:43,674 --> 00:23:46,642
But I think it's really important. I think we always harp on this as
522
00:23:46,666 --> 00:23:49,394
the national security of reducing our reliance
523
00:23:49,442 --> 00:23:51,842
on foreign oil and foreign leaders.
524
00:23:52,026 --> 00:23:54,898
And just every time, the first, first
525
00:23:54,954 --> 00:23:57,618
thing Trump does when he gets elected is give. Makes a call to, like, Saudi
526
00:23:57,634 --> 00:23:58,390
Arabia,
527
00:24:00,340 --> 00:24:02,680
Muhammad Bin Salam, and
528
00:24:03,220 --> 00:24:06,124
he's not a great guy. We don't want to be reliant on them.
529
00:24:06,292 --> 00:24:08,956
Saudi Arabia is moving more into the influence of
530
00:24:09,028 --> 00:24:11,964
China. We need to produce some separation
531
00:24:12,012 --> 00:24:14,892
from them and not be reliant on them. We did under the Biden
532
00:24:14,956 --> 00:24:17,020
administration. We did become, like, the largest
533
00:24:17,180 --> 00:24:19,852
exporter of oil. So we
534
00:24:19,876 --> 00:24:22,530
are net, net, uh,
535
00:24:22,530 --> 00:24:25,160
exporter of fossil fuels right now.
536
00:24:25,460 --> 00:24:27,530
And in my opinion, every,
537
00:24:28,790 --> 00:24:31,774
every gallon or barrel less that we don't use is something that
538
00:24:31,782 --> 00:24:34,702
we can export and make more money off of. So I just view
539
00:24:34,726 --> 00:24:36,970
it as a competitive standpoint of
540
00:24:37,430 --> 00:24:40,174
reducing your resource consumption and exporting
541
00:24:40,302 --> 00:24:41,470
for profit.
542
00:24:41,630 --> 00:24:44,542
>> Katie: Don't get high off your own supplies access. Sell it for
543
00:24:44,566 --> 00:24:45,534
a profit instead.
544
00:24:45,662 --> 00:24:46,770
>> Zach: Exactly.
545
00:24:47,110 --> 00:24:49,742
>> Katie: Well done, kingpin. All right. But, yeah, no, I
546
00:24:49,766 --> 00:24:52,622
completely agree with you. I think that once we realize that there's money to be
547
00:24:52,646 --> 00:24:55,470
made there by consuming less, um, um,
548
00:24:55,470 --> 00:24:58,400
you're right. We'd be making money hand over fist. It's just waking people
549
00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:01,056
up to the reality that that can be achieved without
550
00:25:01,128 --> 00:25:04,032
relying on dictators and terrorists and dictator, um, and
551
00:25:04,056 --> 00:25:06,800
terrorist allies for our most prized
552
00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:08,300
resources and energy.
553
00:25:08,760 --> 00:25:11,744
>> Zach: And if we. And another point of the unpredictability of the
554
00:25:11,752 --> 00:25:14,672
tariffs is it is sort of biting us in
555
00:25:14,696 --> 00:25:17,600
our own. But because now China
556
00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:20,570
is canceling all contracts with Boeing, they're canceling all
557
00:25:20,610 --> 00:25:23,578
natural gas imports from the US and they had, they were
558
00:25:23,714 --> 00:25:26,362
one of our major export, one of the countries we export a lot
559
00:25:26,386 --> 00:25:28,710
to. So it's sort of we need to
560
00:25:29,330 --> 00:25:32,218
plan forward and be clear and
561
00:25:32,274 --> 00:25:34,842
communicate what we want. And the
562
00:25:34,946 --> 00:25:37,802
confusion that Trump's sort of intermixed into his
563
00:25:37,826 --> 00:25:40,442
trade policy is causing a lot of
564
00:25:40,466 --> 00:25:43,146
uncertainty, which is not great for my stock portfolio.
565
00:25:43,258 --> 00:25:45,802
>> Katie: Somebody let Trump know that we can't export to
566
00:25:45,826 --> 00:25:48,792
ourselves. Um, I think that once he
567
00:25:48,816 --> 00:25:51,720
figures that out, I don't know where he's planning on getting
568
00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:54,712
all this stuff, but, uh, we, we can't send it to
569
00:25:54,736 --> 00:25:55,420
ourselves.
570
00:25:56,720 --> 00:25:59,512
So let's talk a little bit more about the relationship
571
00:25:59,576 --> 00:26:02,504
between a carbon price and CBAMs, and
572
00:26:02,512 --> 00:26:05,496
then I'll talk a little bit more about, um, some of the global
573
00:26:05,568 --> 00:26:08,520
and domestic economic and political considerations
574
00:26:08,600 --> 00:26:11,464
to bringing a carbon price on a CBAM
575
00:26:11,512 --> 00:26:14,322
to life. So firstly, the CBAM and the
576
00:26:14,346 --> 00:26:17,202
carbon border adjustment fee, or the carbon fee and dividend
577
00:26:17,266 --> 00:26:20,226
together the carbon fee and dividend approach and the carbon border
578
00:26:20,258 --> 00:26:23,090
adjustment aim to reduce domestic emissions
579
00:26:23,170 --> 00:26:25,554
and ensure that the US Is not at a competitive
580
00:26:25,602 --> 00:26:28,514
disadvantage when it comes to participating in global
581
00:26:28,602 -->
00:26:31,442
markets because they've got a strong climate
582
00:26:31,506 --> 00:26:34,450
policy. So this is where I know we talk a lot on the
583
00:26:34,490 --> 00:26:37,106
show about conservatives needing to embrace the balance
584
00:26:37,138 --> 00:26:40,002
between economics and conservation. And
585
00:26:40,026 --> 00:26:42,962
this is a key example of that. The carbon fee itself
586
00:26:43,026 --> 00:26:45,678
creates a strong economic and incentive for
587
00:26:45,734 --> 00:26:48,206
US businesses and consumers to reduce their carbon
588
00:26:48,238 --> 00:26:50,894
emissions, while the CBAM addresses the global
589
00:26:50,982 --> 00:26:53,982
aspect by ensuring that imports are held to
590
00:26:54,006 --> 00:26:56,222
similar standards, which prevents industries from
591
00:26:56,246 --> 00:26:59,166
relocating to countries that have weaker
592
00:26:59,198 --> 00:27:01,854
environmental regulations. So the carbon fee and
593
00:27:01,862 --> 00:27:04,782
dividend approach has gained a significant amount of
594
00:27:04,806 --> 00:27:07,646
support among moderate Democrats and some Republicans, especially
595
00:27:07,718 --> 00:27:10,430
due to the dividend aspect, which appeals to those
596
00:27:10,470 --> 00:27:13,040
concerned about the economic impact on
597
00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:15,904
consumers. It is seen as a way to address climate
598
00:27:15,952 --> 00:27:18,800
change while mitigating potential economic hardship for low
599
00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:21,776
and middle income families. But some of the pushback
600
00:27:21,808 --> 00:27:24,752
that I've seen related to this is that it doesn't end.
601
00:27:24,776 --> 00:27:27,616
Obviously you'll know what our opinion is on this show. A lot of folks
602
00:27:27,648 --> 00:27:30,192
say that it doesn't go far enough and that it only
603
00:27:30,296 --> 00:27:33,216
respects. Well, maybe I shouldn't say respects. It only gives
604
00:27:33,248 --> 00:27:35,616
a like dividend
605
00:27:35,808 --> 00:27:38,592
back to American citizen families. So
606
00:27:38,616 --> 00:27:41,264
undocumented folks are pretty much left out of the
607
00:27:41,272 --> 00:27:44,252
equation. And a lot of indigenous indigenous communities have not
608
00:27:44,276 --> 00:27:46,732
been interacted with for discussing the
609
00:27:46,756 --> 00:27:49,436
intricacies of what a carbon fee and dividend
610
00:27:49,468 --> 00:27:52,204
returned to indigenous communities might look like. So a lot of
611
00:27:52,212 --> 00:27:55,110
indigenous communities are largely left out of it as well. So
612
00:27:55,110 --> 00:27:58,092
um, that's a lot of the critique that comes from Democrats that are
613
00:27:58,116 --> 00:28:00,796
a little bit further left. If you might be wondering why aren't
614
00:28:00,828 --> 00:28:03,612
Democrats supporting an environmental policy, well, that would be
615
00:28:03,636 --> 00:28:06,492
why they don't feel that it goes far enough. Another thing to consider
616
00:28:06,596 --> 00:28:09,564
is that in the case of the American carbon price, there have
617
00:28:09,572 --> 00:28:12,302
been a lot of exceptions made. And I don't have the full
618
00:28:12,326 --> 00:28:14,718
list in front of me, but I know that it's military
619
00:28:14,814 --> 00:28:16,670
transportation. So like trucking,
620
00:28:16,750 --> 00:28:19,390
agriculture, um,
621
00:28:19,670 --> 00:28:22,574
I think I said transportation. So like aircraft flights, I
622
00:28:22,582 --> 00:28:25,566
think was, was one of the ones included. But there are several sectors
623
00:28:25,598 --> 00:28:28,126
that have been exempt from
624
00:28:28,198 --> 00:28:30,894
falling within the jurisdiction of a carbon fee and
625
00:28:30,902 --> 00:28:33,742
dividend as a way to appeal to the widest audience
626
00:28:33,806 --> 00:28:36,398
available while also not too
627
00:28:36,454 --> 00:28:39,342
grossly causing economic upset in a direction and
628
00:28:39,366 --> 00:28:41,834
in sectors that aren't the primary
629
00:28:41,882 --> 00:28:44,842
intention of the carbon price. So that's something to keep
630
00:28:44,866 --> 00:28:45,498
in mind.
631
00:28:45,634 --> 00:28:48,058
>> Zach: Always got to make sure you have something in there to protect farmers because they already.
632
00:28:48,114 --> 00:28:50,090
>> Katie: Exactly. Oh, yeah, oh yeah, right.
633
00:28:50,130 --> 00:28:51,098
>> Zach: Center up and down.
634
00:28:51,234 --> 00:28:54,058
>> Katie: Yeah. And I think that that's something that is very
635
00:28:54,114 --> 00:28:56,826
unique, I think, to the U.S. obviously there's
636
00:28:56,858 --> 00:28:59,450
farmers everywhere and there's going to be farmers in Europe as
637
00:28:59,490 --> 00:29:02,282
well. But when you look at the numbers of just how
638
00:29:02,306 --> 00:29:05,130
few farmers there are here in the US and just how many people they
639
00:29:05,170 --> 00:29:08,034
have to feed. Yeah, I agree with you completely, Zach.
640
00:29:08,082 --> 00:29:11,050
Farmers needed all the legs up that they can get. And, uh,
641
00:29:11,226 --> 00:29:14,162
so the CBAM and carbon price folks are pretty smart when it came to
642
00:29:14,186 --> 00:29:16,578
crafting legislation to make sure that they weren't dinging these
643
00:29:16,634 --> 00:29:19,234
folks once again. And I think a lot of that also
644
00:29:19,322 --> 00:29:22,290
created a lot of buy in from folks on the right whose immediate
645
00:29:22,370 --> 00:29:24,722
protests were going to be military and
646
00:29:24,746 --> 00:29:26,626
agriculture. So. Excellent.
647
00:29:26,658 --> 00:29:29,538
>> Zach: Maybe Bill Cassidy foresight. Maybe Bill Cassidy, Lindsey
648
00:29:29,554 --> 00:29:32,402
Graham learned some lessons watching, uh, the farmers in Europe and how they
649
00:29:32,426 --> 00:29:32,898
protest.
650
00:29:32,994 --> 00:29:34,754
>> Katie: Actually, like, like, I know we joke.
651
00:29:34,802 --> 00:29:35,928
>> Zach:
We don't want to piss them off.
652
00:29:36,034 --> 00:29:38,860
>> Katie: Yeah, I think that's legitimately, I think they realize, yeah, we
653
00:29:38,900 --> 00:29:41,612
don't want to piss off the folks that have like 3 tons of
654
00:29:41,636 --> 00:29:44,476
manure at their disposal at any given time. We operate
655
00:29:44,508 --> 00:29:47,436
out of buildings that are primarily white. Maybe we, maybe
656
00:29:47,468 --> 00:29:50,380
we should invite that upon themselves. A good idea.
657
00:29:50,460 --> 00:29:53,228
Let's talk a little bit about the international component of
658
00:29:53,284 --> 00:29:56,092
bringing this to life as well. So the CBAM
659
00:29:56,156 --> 00:29:58,748
becomes a little more contentious when there's more players
660
00:29:58,804 --> 00:30:01,532
involved, which means it gets a little more contentious when it's on the
661
00:30:01,556 --> 00:30:04,556
international stage. So it might incentivize some countries
662
00:30:04,628 --> 00:30:07,458
to implement their own carbon pricing systems. But I
663
00:30:07,514 --> 00:30:10,498
also lead to trade tensions, particularly with nations
664
00:30:10,514 --> 00:30:13,442
that have a less robust climate policy. So the
665
00:30:13,466 --> 00:30:16,434
US would need to engage diplomatically to ensure that the
666
00:30:16,442 --> 00:30:19,362
mechanism doesn't violate trade agreements and is perceived as
667
00:30:19,386 --> 00:30:22,242
fair globally. I know that, uh, some of the countries that are
668
00:30:22,266 --> 00:30:24,674
always brought up anytime that I lobby
669
00:30:24,722 --> 00:30:27,650
conservative offices in support of a carbon price
670
00:30:27,690 --> 00:30:30,562
are always, well, what does this do about China, India and Russia? Those
671
00:30:30,586 --> 00:30:33,126
are always the three that are mentioned. Well, it's
672
00:30:33,158 --> 00:30:35,894
a carbon border adjustment mechanism.
673
00:30:36,022 --> 00:30:38,822
They will have to face some of the same fines and
674
00:30:38,846 --> 00:30:41,174
penalties that everybody else does. That's how the fee
675
00:30:41,222 --> 00:30:44,022
works. So it's always interesting to hear them
676
00:30:44,046 --> 00:30:46,774
talk about it or about these countries
677
00:30:46,862 --> 00:30:49,830
first. When we can't control what these countries do on their
678
00:30:49,870 --> 00:30:52,742
own time for themselves, we do have
679
00:30:52,766 --> 00:30:55,382
a say in how they interact with us, uh, which is where the
680
00:30:55,406 --> 00:30:58,390
CBAM comes in. So obviously it's meant to create a more
681
00:30:58,430 --> 00:31:01,282
level playing field again. And another thing
682
00:31:01,306 --> 00:31:04,034
to consider here is that I think it also gives us protection
683
00:31:04,082 --> 00:31:06,914
against countries that might not be completely
684
00:31:06,962 --> 00:31:09,730
honest with us. My immediate first thought is
685
00:31:09,770 --> 00:31:12,562
China. Obviously, I think a lot of people realize
686
00:31:12,626 --> 00:31:15,090
just how bad China fudges the numbers on, like
687
00:31:15,130 --> 00:31:17,586
everything during the COVID
688
00:31:17,658 --> 00:31:20,210
pandemic, because the numbers that China was
689
00:31:20,250 --> 00:31:23,186
reporting were nowhere near the numbers that everybody else
690
00:31:23,218 --> 00:31:26,066
had. So you don't exactly want to play fair
691
00:31:26,138 --> 00:31:29,026
with somebody who's just making the numbers up every single day.
692
00:31:29,098 --> 00:31:31,998
China might say that they've got the best climate possible, see, in the whole
693
00:31:32,014 --> 00:31:34,862
wide world, and maybe they've got one that's better than ours. But
694
00:31:34,886 --> 00:31:37,822
I'm not going to believe China's numbers on how China's performing on
695
00:31:37,846 --> 00:31:40,766
the environment, because I can't believe China's numbers on how China's performing
696
00:31:40,798 --> 00:31:43,534
on anything. So this carbon border
697
00:31:43,582 --> 00:31:46,254
adjustment mechanism would have some hard and fast
698
00:31:46,302 --> 00:31:48,798
rules in place to prevent a lot of that loosey
699
00:31:48,814 --> 00:31:51,806
goosey, uh, I just made it up. That's my source from happening
700
00:31:51,838 --> 00:31:54,670
from a lot of other countries. So that's something to keep in mind
701
00:31:54,710 --> 00:31:57,710
as well. And when it comes to the World
702
00:31:57,750 --> 00:32:00,606
Trade Organization, obviously, as mentioned earlier, the CBAM
703
00:32:00,638 --> 00:32:03,532
would have to be within WTO compliance. And in
704
00:32:03,556 --> 00:32:06,476
order to comply with those rules, the CBM
705
00:32:06,508 --> 00:32:09,068
would need to ensure that it doesn't discriminate against
706
00:32:09,124 --> 00:32:11,916
specific countries, but instead imposes tariffs
707
00:32:12,028 --> 00:32:14,796
on all imports according to their carbon emissions without
708
00:32:14,868 --> 00:32:17,852
unduly harming developing economies that might not have
709
00:32:17,876 --> 00:32:20,796
the resources to even implement a similar carbon
710
00:32:20,828 --> 00:32:23,756
pricing system for themselves. So obviously it would
711
00:32:23,908 --> 00:32:26,908
have to make sure that it does not disparage any
712
00:32:26,964 --> 00:32:29,932
country that is more likely to face the negative repercussions of
713
00:32:29,956 --> 00:32:32,796
climate change than it is to exacerbate the effects
714
00:32:32,828 --> 00:32:33,800
of climate change.
715
00:32:36,450 --> 00:32:39,322
So the American Carbon Price and its sister
716
00:32:39,386 --> 00:32:42,330
carbon border adjustment mechanism are both designed to
717
00:32:42,370 --> 00:32:45,226
tackle climate change by pricing carbon emissions
718
00:32:45,258 --> 00:32:48,250
and incentivizing, uh, sustainable practices, while
719
00:32:48,290 --> 00:32:51,178
also addressing the risk of carbon leakage in international
720
00:32:51,314 --> 00:32:54,122
trade. So this has got a nice balance of
721
00:32:54,146 --> 00:32:56,570
domestic policy, international trade
722
00:32:56,610 --> 00:32:59,162
agreements, and they all represent a robust
723
00:32:59,226 --> 00:33:01,738
approach to reducing emissions and fostering global
724
00:33:01,794 --> 00:33:04,586
cooperation on climate action. So the key
725
00:33:04,658 --> 00:33:07,114
to its success is going to lie in careful
726
00:33:07,162 --> 00:33:10,074
implementation, uh, obviously bipartisan
727
00:33:10,122 --> 00:33:12,890
support. We saw what happens, um, back
728
00:33:12,930 --> 00:33:13,914
in, what,
729
00:33:14,082 --> 00:33:16,938
2022, when you have
730
00:33:16,994 --> 00:33:19,754
one party and one party alone pass climate
731
00:33:19,802 --> 00:33:22,330
legislation, the other party will harp on it for the rest of their
732
00:33:22,370 --> 00:33:24,922
lives. So obviously this is going to need to be
733
00:33:24,946 --> 00:33:27,850
bipartisan. So I'm really encouraged to see that
734
00:33:27,890 --> 00:33:30,762
conservatives are leading the talks on this because they're the ones that I would expect
735
00:33:30,786 --> 00:33:33,496
to be a little bit hesitant. So hopefully enough moderate
736
00:33:33,528 --> 00:33:36,104
Democrats will come to the table for this to be considered
737
00:33:36,152 --> 00:33:39,144
bipartisan legislation in the near future. So we'll just have to
738
00:33:39,152 --> 00:33:41,544
see what happens from there. We'll keep you updated here.
739
00:33:41,632 --> 00:33:44,632
Hopefully, as we hope, uh, good things work out
740
00:33:44,656 --> 00:33:47,144
with Senator Graham and Senator
741
00:33:47,192 --> 00:33:50,120
Cassidy as they do their own investigation on
742
00:33:50,160 --> 00:33:52,936
carbon pricing and carbon border adjustment mechanisms. Yeah.
743
00:33:53,048 --> 00:33:55,816
>> Zach: And hopefully. So for some action steps, hopefully we can get
744
00:33:55,888 --> 00:33:58,872
people out and telling their senators and congressmen that they want this
745
00:33:58,896 --> 00:34:01,618
and that they're interested in what these people are doing.
746
00:34:01,754 --> 00:34:04,690
>> Katie: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. Zach, excellent segue.
747
00:34:04,770 --> 00:34:07,650
I know. Always on the show, for action steps, we're telling people,
748
00:34:07,690 --> 00:34:10,610
call your member of Congress. Oh, my God. Do it now. Call your member
749
00:34:10,650 --> 00:34:13,410
of Congress. Let them know that you support a
750
00:34:13,450 --> 00:34:16,290
carbon price and a carbon border adjustment mechanism. As
751
00:34:16,330 --> 00:34:19,154
a young conservative environmentalist, those would be the key words.
752
00:34:19,202 --> 00:34:22,178
That's like saying you're a unicorn. The moment you say those
753
00:34:22,234 --> 00:34:25,122
words, everybody in the office is listening to what you're saying because
754
00:34:25,146 --> 00:34:27,889
they can't believe they've got a unicorn on the phone. So
755
00:34:27,929 --> 00:34:30,417
call your member of Congress and let them know that as a young
756
00:34:30,473 --> 00:34:33,169
conservative, you are concerned about the environment
757
00:34:33,289 --> 00:34:36,161
and you are in support of a carbon price and a
758
00:34:36,185 --> 00:34:39,121
carbon border adjustment mechanism. And hopefully you know a little bit
759
00:34:39,145 --> 00:34:41,841
more about the Canadian carbon price from
760
00:34:41,865 --> 00:34:44,849
Zach's episode that you. So that if they bring that up, you can tell them, uh, ah,
761
00:34:44,889 --> 00:34:47,069
not really. Ours is better because it's American.
762
00:34:48,009 --> 00:34:50,913
So seriously, though, do a little bit of research on the American
763
00:34:51,001 --> 00:34:53,809
carbon price, a little bit of research on what Senators
764
00:34:53,889 --> 00:34:56,851
Graham and Cassidy are proposing. Um, and see how
765
00:34:56,875 --> 00:34:59,811
you feel about that. See what your thoughts are and be sure that your member of
766
00:34:59,835 --> 00:35:02,627
Congress knows it. They make seven figures a year. Make them earn
767
00:35:02,643 --> 00:35:03,199
it.
768
00:35:04,299 --> 00:35:06,723
>> Zach: Yep. Get out. Go out and get them.
769
00:35:06,811 --> 00:35:09,571
>> Katie: Yeah. Pester your member of Congress. Do it. They
770
00:35:09,595 --> 00:35:12,467
can't stop you. It's their job. They can't hang
771
00:35:12,483 --> 00:35:15,347
up on you, by the way. Now, that's not incentive to, like, leave
772
00:35:15,363 --> 00:35:18,291
them on the phone for three hours that they cannot hang up
773
00:35:18,315 --> 00:35:20,931
on you. So if you call your member of Congress's office, be real
774
00:35:20,955 --> 00:35:23,812
nice, but keep in mind you hold
775
00:35:23,836 --> 00:35:24,600
the floor.
776
00:35:26,620 --> 00:35:29,604
For you, our listener. Email us with your thoughts.
777
00:35:29,732 --> 00:35:31,956
Our email is info greentea
778
00:35:31,988 --> 00:35:33,160
partyradio.
779
00:35:34,140 --> 00:35:37,108
>> Zach: Thank you for listening to Green Tea Party Radio. And a very special
780
00:35:37,164 --> 00:35:40,132
thank you to all of our patrons. We couldn't just do this
781
00:35:40,156 --> 00:35:40,804
without you.
782
00:35:40,892 --> 00:35:43,668
If you're interested in getting early access to episodes, well as Green Tea
783
00:35:43,684 --> 00:35:46,180
Party Radio merch, check us out @greent party
784
00:35:46,220 --> 00:35:49,102
radio.com via feedback. Tell us what's your mind
785
00:35:49,126 --> 00:35:51,262
on. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram X and
786
00:35:51,286 --> 00:35:52,210
TikTok.
787
00:35:53,030 --> 00:35:55,646
>> Katie: And just so you know, this is our passion project.
788
00:35:55,798 --> 00:35:58,702
We don't have any organizational sponsor. And just a
789
00:35:58,726 --> 00:36:01,726
reminder that Green Tea Party Radio is not representative
790
00:36:01,758 --> 00:36:04,622
of the Diocese of Little Rock, uh, Catholic Climate Covenant, or
791
00:36:04,646 --> 00:36:07,502
any of our employers. We are just building a
792
00:36:07,526 --> 00:36:10,526
movement because we want the world to know that conservatives, particularly
793
00:36:10,558 --> 00:36:13,436
young ones like us, have important things to. To say about
794
00:36:13,508 --> 00:36:14,600
climate change.
795
00:36:14,900 --> 00:36:17,756
>> Zach: If you want to hear us on your radio station, your college
796
00:36:17,788 --> 00:36:20,380
radio station, email us at info greent party
797
00:36:20,420 --> 00:36:23,276
radio.com and give us a feed. Give us a detail about your campus
798
00:36:23,308 --> 00:36:26,172
and your radio station. That email again is info
799
00:36:26,236 --> 00:36:28,876
greent party radio.com.
800
00:36:29,028 --> 00:36:30,060
thanks for listening.
801
00:36:30,140 --> 00:36:31,440
>> Katie: Thank you for listening.
802
00:36:35,700 --> 00:36:36,748
We did it.
803
00:36:36,884 --> 00:36:37,388
>> Zach: Yeah.
804
00:36:37,484 --> 00:36:39,846
>> Katie: Good episode. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah.
805
00:36:39,878 --> 00:36:41,286
>> Zach: Just go, C Bam.
806
00:36:41,398 --> 00:36:44,166
>> Katie: Yeah. Let's go, C Bam. I'm team C Bam.
807
00:36:44,278 --> 00:36:47,190
Yeah. Let's get my mascot, the cbam, in the room, and
808
00:36:47,230 --> 00:36:48,070
it's like a killer whale.