תעתיק 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:05.610 --> 00:00:08.630
Hi, I'm Wendy Zuckerman, and you're listening to Science Versus
2
00:00:08.750 --> 00:00:11.869
from Gimlet Media. This is the show where we pit
3
00:00:11.970 --> 00:00:18.109
facts against your greatest fears. On today's show, science versus fracking.
4
00:00:18.739 --> 00:00:22.399
Is fracking really making us sick and ruining the environment?
5
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:32.310
When we hear stories about fracking, they often go like this.
6
00:00:33.270 --> 00:00:37.350
A gas company comes to town, starts drilling wells, and
7
00:00:37.390 --> 00:00:42.710
then terrible things start happening. James Hughes says this is
8
00:00:42.890 --> 00:00:46.990
exactly what happened to him when the fracking company Seneca
9
00:00:47.030 --> 00:00:49.929
Resources came to his town in Pennsylvania.
10
00:00:50.770 --> 00:00:53.820
Seneca shows up at my doorstep and says, we're drilling
11
00:00:53.859 --> 00:00:56.640
wells on your property. It was the biggest nightmare I
12
00:00:56.700 --> 00:01:00.880
ever went through. They moved into my property, knocked out my.
13
00:01:00.780 --> 00:01:04.670
Water well, This is from a town hall meeting held
14
00:01:04.689 --> 00:01:08.150
in 2014 when a local township was so freaked out
15
00:01:08.269 --> 00:01:11.620
about Seneca's operations that they were deciding whether or not
16
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:13.959
to hire a lawyer to fight them.
17
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:17.620
They knocked out my water well, knocked out my neighbor's
18
00:01:17.680 --> 00:01:21.500
water well, turned the pond pink. By the time they
19
00:01:21.780 --> 00:01:24.579
gave me my new water well, it was on fire
20
00:01:24.900 --> 00:01:28.689
for six months. My family couldn't visit, couldn't have running water,
21
00:01:29.209 --> 00:01:32.379
and it broke my heart. So meanwhile, during this time,
22
00:01:33.159 --> 00:01:35.379
I composed a song called Chief Thunder.
23
00:01:35.439 --> 00:01:38.859
Please, we've got an attorney on the phone.
24
00:01:38.900 --> 00:01:39.760
Just tell us, give.
25
00:01:39.640 --> 00:01:40.310
Us the results.
26
00:01:40.409 --> 00:01:43.450
This is what fracking has driven Americans to do.
27
00:01:43.469 --> 00:01:47.670
Gas and oil.
28
00:01:48.609 --> 00:01:55.989
Write more folk songs. Actually, I think this is more
29
00:01:56.109 --> 00:01:59.980
prog rock. Just the lack of acoustic guitar.
30
00:02:04.530 --> 00:02:09.050
But this song, of course, is not peer-reviewed research. And
31
00:02:09.110 --> 00:02:12.229
neither is a lot of the conversation happening around fracking.
32
00:02:12.250 --> 00:02:19.129
Fracking is a disaster unfolding across Pennsylvania of unprecedented proportions.
33
00:02:19.469 --> 00:02:21.969
Hydraulic fracturing is spreading across the globe.
34
00:02:21.990 --> 00:02:23.449
Jesus Christ!
35
00:02:23.469 --> 00:02:23.729
Jesus!
36
00:02:26.210 --> 00:02:27.189
Unbelievable.
37
00:02:27.210 --> 00:02:29.590
A river on fire. Whoa!
38
00:02:30.050 --> 00:02:33.210
The river's on fire. Oh, jeez.
39
00:02:34.349 --> 00:02:38.389
The thing is, the anti-frackers love to use hyperbolic statements
40
00:02:38.490 --> 00:02:39.500
and halve truths.
41
00:02:39.930 --> 00:02:40.990
But they aren't alone.
42
00:02:41.229 --> 00:02:43.729
On the other side of this debate, the pro-frackers are
43
00:02:43.750 --> 00:02:47.090
pulling their own kind of crap too. And to demonstrate,
44
00:02:47.650 --> 00:02:51.509
here's a conversation that I had with fracking company Seneca Resources.
45
00:02:52.009 --> 00:02:55.430
This is Doug Kepler, the Vice President of Environmental Engineering,
46
00:02:55.590 --> 00:02:57.930
and Rob Boulware, who works in media relations.
47
00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:00.460
I don't think there ever, I don't believe there has
48
00:03:00.500 --> 00:03:02.439
been a problem with fracking. The problems that you hear
49
00:03:02.479 --> 00:03:05.360
in the media, those all related back in some fashion
50
00:03:05.379 --> 00:03:07.039
to something that had to do with the actual drilling
51
00:03:07.080 --> 00:03:08.539
of the well, not the fracking of the well.
52
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:13.259
But When we say fracking, as journalists, as the media,
53
00:03:13.939 --> 00:03:16.580
and in the public, we mean the entire process of
54
00:03:16.659 --> 00:03:19.020
getting gas from underground to your home.
55
00:03:19.060 --> 00:03:21.620
I spend a lot of time trying to correct it because.
56
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:23.379
That's an incorrect use. Am I the problem?
57
00:03:23.409 --> 00:03:23.840
You are.
58
00:03:23.870 --> 00:03:27.349
No, seriously, you have created an unbelievably serious problem with
59
00:03:27.389 --> 00:03:28.229
this perception thing.
60
00:03:28.270 --> 00:03:31.189
They are answering the question, has there ever been a
61
00:03:31.250 --> 00:03:35.270
problem with fracking, to only address the very specific and
62
00:03:35.530 --> 00:03:37.689
very technical definition of fracking.
63
00:03:38.340 --> 00:03:39.460
Cracking the rocks.
64
00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:44.060
Not the whole process of fracking, which would include drilling
65
00:03:44.099 --> 00:03:46.340
a well, getting the gas out of the well, and
66
00:03:46.439 --> 00:03:49.039
all sorts of stuff that most people think of when
67
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:50.259
they think of fracking.
68
00:03:50.280 --> 00:03:51.960
If you want to have a process talk, then you
69
00:03:51.979 --> 00:03:55.199
can have a process talk. But the whole negativity on
70
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:56.659
fracking is what becomes so wearing.
71
00:03:56.680 --> 00:03:58.099
No, we want to have a process chat. So the
72
00:03:58.139 --> 00:03:59.599
entire process of fracking.
73
00:04:00.300 --> 00:04:03.759
Has there ever been water contaminated as a result of
74
00:04:03.800 --> 00:04:05.419
the entire process of fracking?
75
00:04:05.439 --> 00:04:06.620
You're talking about from drilling to.
76
Load full transcript
00:04:06.780 --> 00:04:08.879
From drilling to, yes. So if you're going to say
77
00:04:08.909 --> 00:04:10.069
drilling but not fracking.
78
00:04:10.430 --> 00:04:10.550
Ugh.
79
00:04:11.430 --> 00:04:16.009
So that's Seneca Resources, the very same company that inspired
80
00:04:16.350 --> 00:04:17.350
Chief Thundercloud.
81
00:04:17.449 --> 00:04:18.829
Whatever happened.
82
00:04:18.910 --> 00:04:21.610
No, there's no need to play that again. Enough with
83
00:04:21.629 --> 00:04:22.509
the folk songs.
84
00:04:23.439 --> 00:04:27.819
Enough with the Wagner soundtracks and the shady definitions.
85
00:04:28.430 --> 00:04:30.870
We're here to look at the science.
86
00:04:33.509 --> 00:04:37.310
Today we're looking at how fracking affects four major things.
87
00:04:37.790 --> 00:04:42.319
Our water, our health, earthquakes and finally our climate.
88
00:04:43.560 --> 00:04:47.139
Let's start with a detailed look at how fracking actually works.
89
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:50.819
Our frackers, Seneca's Rob Bulware and Doug Kepler, offered to
90
00:04:50.860 --> 00:04:53.189
give us an up-close look at one of their fracking
91
00:04:53.230 --> 00:04:58.149
sites in northwestern Pennsylvania. The fracking site itself is actually
92
00:04:58.310 --> 00:05:01.470
inside a national forest, which means that as you drive in,
93
00:05:01.610 --> 00:05:05.310
you see tonnes of trees and beaver dams and even
94
00:05:05.449 --> 00:05:08.699
Pennsylvania's state bird, the ruffled grouse.
95
00:05:09.459 --> 00:05:12.870
Oh, look, Doug. You see it, Doug? It's a grouse,
96
00:05:13.269 --> 00:05:14.970
isn't it?
97
00:05:15.029 --> 00:05:15.649
Right back there.
98
00:05:15.670 --> 00:05:15.829
See?
99
00:05:16.350 --> 00:05:20.050
But as you approach the frack, things look a little different.
100
00:05:20.769 --> 00:05:23.290
We see a couple of huge cranes connected to a
101
00:05:23.370 --> 00:05:27.250
bundle of narrow pipes. And it's right here that water
102
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:30.800
gets pushed under the surface at intense pressures, which is
103
00:05:30.839 --> 00:05:33.560
what cracks the rock to release the natural gas.
104
00:05:34.259 --> 00:05:37.480
We're actually fracking right now underground, so... There is a
105
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:40.000
five-inch diameter pipe that that water is being pumped through.
106
00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:43.220
We're pumping about 4,000 gallons per minute of water through
107
00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:45.519
that pipe. So a tremendous amount of water in a
108
00:05:45.540 --> 00:05:48.149
very quick time. The pressure from that is what breaks
109
00:05:48.170 --> 00:05:48.529
the rock.
110
00:05:48.750 --> 00:05:50.810
Gimlet producer Caitlin Kenney is here with me.
111
00:05:51.209 --> 00:05:52.370
We're right under our feet right now.
112
00:05:52.509 --> 00:05:53.910
Big, old rocks are breaking.
113
00:05:53.990 --> 00:05:54.430
Yes, and.
114
00:05:54.449 --> 00:05:57.509
I can't feel anything.
115
00:05:58.290 --> 00:06:00.500
But it's not just water going down that pipe.
116
00:06:00.879 --> 00:06:02.660
There's also sand and chemicals.
117
00:06:03.180 --> 00:06:05.360
There's a conveyor belt that takes all the sand to
118
00:06:05.379 --> 00:06:07.899
the blender... where the water in those tanks is blended
119
00:06:07.939 --> 00:06:10.439
along with the chemicals, and then they're pumped downhole.
120
00:06:10.959 --> 00:06:12.980
The sand is used to keep the cracks in the
121
00:06:13.019 --> 00:06:15.600
rocks open so that the gas can flow out, while
122
00:06:15.620 --> 00:06:19.600
the chemicals, they do a couple of things. A bactericide
123
00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:22.959
is added to prevent bacteria growing down the hole, and
124
00:06:22.980 --> 00:06:25.800
to get the fracking fluid moving very quickly through a
125
00:06:25.879 --> 00:06:30.600
very narrow pipe, they add friction reducers. And this brings
126
00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:33.610
us to the first fear that people have about fracking.
127
00:06:34.430 --> 00:06:39.490
Can these chemicals get into our drinking water? When rocks
128
00:06:39.529 --> 00:06:42.329
are being cracked more than a mile underground, which is
129
00:06:42.410 --> 00:06:45.910
below drinking water supplies, studies have shown that there is
130
00:06:46.029 --> 00:06:49.589
a very low risk of the fracking chemicals seeping up
131
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:53.839
through the rocks, up into your drinking water. It could happen,
132
00:06:54.319 --> 00:06:57.220
but one study estimated that it would take several thousand
133
00:06:57.660 --> 00:07:01.319
or even millions of years. And the thing is, one
134
00:07:01.379 --> 00:07:05.779
report estimated that 95% of fracking wells in America are
135
00:07:05.819 --> 00:07:09.680
being fracked this far below the surface. In Australia, though,
136
00:07:09.839 --> 00:07:14.079
where fracking is happening higher up, it is riskier. So
137
00:07:14.819 --> 00:07:18.360
that's cracks in rocks. But there is also the potential
138
00:07:18.459 --> 00:07:21.939
of chemicals leaking into our water through cracks in pipes.
139
00:07:22.879 --> 00:07:26.470
But how often does that happen? Well, a study found
140
00:07:26.569 --> 00:07:27.649
that in Pennsylvania.
141
00:07:27.649 --> 00:07:31.019
6% of pipes had some kind of problem.
142
00:07:31.610 --> 00:07:36.829
So it's not widespread, but it is happening. So that's
143
00:07:36.870 --> 00:07:40.399
what's happening below ground. But the biggest risk.
144
00:07:40.220 --> 00:07:45.839
Of contamination, it seems, is happening above ground on the surface.
145
00:07:46.399 --> 00:07:47.339
What am I looking at here?
146
00:07:47.810 --> 00:07:47.990
Red.
147
00:07:48.439 --> 00:07:51.279
Doug from Seneca explains that once you've cracked the rocks
148
00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:54.139
open to release the natural gas, the gas comes up
149
00:07:54.379 --> 00:07:57.490
and the pressure from the gas carries the fracking
water
150
00:07:57.550 --> 00:07:58.250
back up with it.
151
00:07:58.259 --> 00:08:01.009
So you had shoved the water down there?
152
00:08:01.389 --> 00:08:04.230
We pump it down under pressure to fracture the rock
153
00:08:04.449 --> 00:08:07.089
and then the pressure of the gas carries the water
154
00:08:07.129 --> 00:08:08.750
back up out of the ground with the gas and
155
00:08:08.790 --> 00:08:10.379
then we separate the gas from the water.
156
00:08:10.899 --> 00:08:13.600
And this water, which has the fracking chemicals in it
157
00:08:13.800 --> 00:08:16.459
plus salts and heavy metals from underground.
158
00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:20.170
is now known as wastewater.
159
00:08:21.370 --> 00:08:23.810
Anyway, you've got all this wastewater that's up at the
160
00:08:23.870 --> 00:08:27.009
surface and it gets trucked or piped away from the
161
00:08:27.050 --> 00:08:29.589
fracking site and then Seneca has to figure out what
162
00:08:29.629 --> 00:08:32.470
to do with it. Right now, they're storing some of
163
00:08:32.549 --> 00:08:34.730
it and they showed us the storage site. It looked
164
00:08:34.750 --> 00:08:36.950
like three giant water coolers.
165
00:08:37.549 --> 00:08:39.210
So this is how many gallons?
166
00:08:39.429 --> 00:08:41.610
Each one of those three tanks holds two million gallons
167
00:08:41.649 --> 00:08:42.009
of water.
168
00:08:42.470 --> 00:08:44.269
That is a load of water.
169
00:08:45.429 --> 00:08:46.370
It is a lot of water.
170
00:08:46.940 --> 00:08:50.460
When you look at the entire fracking industry, it's billions
171
00:08:50.559 --> 00:08:51.419
of gallons.
172
00:08:51.120 --> 00:08:52.590
Of wastewater per year.
173
00:08:53.139 --> 00:08:56.029
And while the shiny tanks that we saw looked watertight,
174
00:08:56.769 --> 00:08:59.230
not all fracking sites are storing their wastewater this way.
175
00:09:00.210 --> 00:09:03.809
Sometimes fracking companies use pits, large holes that they've dug
176
00:09:03.850 --> 00:09:06.830
in the ground and then lined with a plastic. Now,
177
00:09:07.049 --> 00:09:11.139
this plastic is thick, but still it can rip, allowing
178
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:12.120
wastewater to leak.
179
00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:13.519
Also.
180
00:09:14.039 --> 00:09:17.700
When you're schlepping vats of wastewater plus vats of fracking
181
00:09:17.740 --> 00:09:22.740
chemicals around, there's just lots of chances for spills. But
182
00:09:22.799 --> 00:09:27.139
here's the question, and it's a really important question. Yes,
183
00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:31.120
there's lots of chances for leaks and spills, but how
184
00:09:31.250 --> 00:09:32.950
often do they actually happen?
185
00:09:33.870 --> 00:09:35.629
It's time to talk to our expert.
186
00:09:36.090 --> 00:09:36.789
The bullfrog.
187
00:09:39.330 --> 00:09:42.669
This is Robert Jackson, a professor at Stanford, and he's
188
00:09:42.789 --> 00:09:46.529
one of the top experts on fracking in America. He
189
00:09:46.629
--> 00:09:51.019
also does some very impressive frog poetry. This is the
190
00:09:51.059 --> 00:09:51.840
green tree frog.
191
00:09:52.220 --> 00:09:53.179
Oinky boink boink.
192
00:09:53.659 --> 00:09:55.860
So remember when I said at the beginning of the
193
00:09:55.899 --> 00:09:58.889
show that both sides of this debate weren't being straight
194
00:09:58.929 --> 00:10:02.500
with the fracts? Well, that can make it hard to
195
00:10:02.559 --> 00:10:06.700
know who to trust on this fracking debate. But Robert Jackson,
196
00:10:07.059 --> 00:10:10.309
he's my guy. I do trust what he says. And
197
00:10:10.350 --> 00:10:13.970
it's not because of the frog poetry. Well, it's partly
198
00:10:13.990 --> 00:10:16.990
because of the frog poetry. But it's also because of this.
199
00:10:17.629 --> 00:10:21.990
Honestly, I get beat up. from everybody, depending on what a,
200
00:10:22.610 --> 00:10:25.289
what a particular study says. When we publish a study
201
00:10:25.330 --> 00:10:28.269
that says we find no evidence of, of contamination of
202
00:10:28.309 --> 00:10:30.350
drinking water in a place like the Fayetteville field, I
203
00:10:30.389 --> 00:10:32.210
get calls and emails from people saying, you know, how
204
00:10:32.250 --> 00:10:34.370
can you say that? And, you know, you, you only
205
00:10:34.409 --> 00:10:37.110
looked at a hundred or 150 houses and, and this
206
00:10:37.129 --> 00:10:38.870
and this and that. And, and I promise you every
207
00:10:38.909 --> 00:10:43.149
time I say that we find water contamination or publish
208
00:10:43.169 --> 00:10:45.799
a map of 6,000 leaks in Washington, DC, I get
209
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.580
beat up from, from people in industry who say you're
210
00:10:48.620 --> 00:10:53.259
fear mongering, you're, promoting the decline of our industry and
211
00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:55.159
all that. I get it from all sides.
212
00:10:55.179 --> 00:10:59.220
So, leading researcher in the field pisses off both sides
213
00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:02.679
of this debate. What does he say about how often
214
00:11:02.740 --> 00:11:04.379
fracking contaminates water?
215
00:11:05.100 --> 00:11:08.379
It does contaminate drinking water. It has contaminated drinking water.
216
00:11:09.360 --> 00:11:13.240
But most of the time, it doesn't. So it can happen.
217
00:11:13.259 --> 00:11:16.159
It doesn't happen very often. But when it happens to
218
00:11:16.210 --> 00:11:18.809
you or your neighborhood or you think it could happen
219
00:11:18.850 --> 00:11:22.370
to you, It's something to be afraid of. I think
220
00:11:22.429 --> 00:11:25.440
that's what people latch on to. So most of the time,
221
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:27.899
it's completely safe. Once in a while, it isn't.
222
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:31.120
It's really hard for scientists to put a figure on
223
00:11:31.179 --> 00:11:34.360
what that once in a while is. A report made
224
00:11:34.419 --> 00:11:38.289
public by the Environmental Protection Agency last year put the
225
00:11:38.330 --> 00:11:44.049
number at between 100 to 3,700 spills from fracking each
226
00:11:44.129 --> 00:11:47.970
year in the United States. Let's think about that for
227
00:11:48.009 --> 00:11:52.509
a second. The EPA doesn't know if there are 100
228
00:11:52.509 --> 00:11:56.210
or 3,700 spills.
229
00:11:56.389 --> 00:11:58.110
We're going to put a sound effect on that, right?
230
00:11:58.710 --> 00:11:58.889
Cool.
231
00:11:59.190 --> 00:12:05.889
From fracking each year. Why so much uncertainty? Well, there's
232
00:12:05.909 --> 00:12:06.519
a few reasons.
233
00:12:07.059 --> 00:12:10.000
But one of them is that if scientists go to
234
00:12:10.039 --> 00:12:12.379
a town and test the water and find out that
235
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:16.259
it's dodgy... If no-one tested that water before the frackers
236
00:12:16.299 --> 00:12:18.799
came to town, then the scientists can't say for sure
237
00:12:18.899 --> 00:12:21.980
what made it dodgy. Some things are just naturally in
238
00:12:22.019 --> 00:12:24.639
the water. They come from the rocks and the geology nearby.
239
00:12:24.659 --> 00:12:28.480
And currently, we don't have a lot of this independently
240
00:12:28.519 --> 00:12:33.679
gathered baseline data. Add to this, it's notoriously difficult to
241
00:12:33.730 --> 00:12:38.190
get fracking companies to acknowledge spills and to explain what happened.
242
00:12:39.389 --> 00:12:40.549
Seneca does this too.
243
00:12:42.370 --> 00:12:45.730
Take, for example, when we asked Doug from Seneca about
244
00:12:45.769 --> 00:12:48.889
whether fracking chemicals had ever contaminated water.
245
00:12:49.549 --> 00:12:51.409
He and Rob denied it.
246
00:12:52.710 --> 00:12:55.269
I don't think we could find a documented case of that.
247
00:12:55.509 --> 00:12:56.149
But we could.
248
00:12:56.710 --> 00:13:00.429
We used the internet and found that there were 270
249
00:13:00.429 --> 00:13:03.769
instances where an oil and gas company had affected someone's
250
00:13:03.830 --> 00:13:07.870
water supply in Pennsylvania. In each of those cases, the
251
00:13:07.909 --> 00:13:12.309
Department of Environmental Protection, or DUP, sent a letter confirming
252
00:13:12.350 --> 00:13:15.809
the contamination to the company that was responsible. And Seneca
253
00:13:16.129 --> 00:13:19.370
was called out in a handful of those letters. When
254
00:13:19.389 --> 00:13:22.509
we talked to Seneca about this, they kept denying that
255
00:13:22.570 --> 00:13:27.100
their chemicals were responsible for contaminating people's water. And that's
256
00:13:27.539 --> 00:13:29.240
when we finally took out the letters.
257
00:13:29.860 --> 00:13:32.460
OK, so like.
258
00:13:30.460 --> 00:13:32.740
like this.
259
00:13:32.759 --> 00:13:34.059
Have you guys seen these letters?
260
00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:37.679
From the Department of Environmental.
261
00:13:38.350 --> 00:13:40.850
protection in
Pennsylvania. This is to Seneca.
262
00:13:41.009 --> 00:13:43.190
Now, for a visual on what you're about to hear,
263
00:13:43.490 --> 00:13:46.700
this was happening in Rob's car right outside the fracking site.
264
00:13:47.039 --> 00:13:49.259
The conversation went on for a while, and by the
265
00:13:49.299 --> 00:13:51.240
time I took the letters out of my backpack, it
266
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:53.899
was actually so tense that the windows had steamed up,
267
00:13:54.059 --> 00:13:54.879
Titanic style.
268
00:13:55.440 --> 00:13:56.809
So just the fact that you have one of these
269
00:13:56.850 --> 00:13:59.169
letters doesn't mean we actually polluted something. It means that
270
00:13:59.230 --> 00:14:01.029
they were responding to a complaint that was made.
271
00:14:01.090 --> 00:14:03.549
I think this says that actually it did determine that
272
00:14:03.570 --> 00:14:04.669
there was a pollution.
273
00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:08.500
Let me see what's this one. This is again, Warsaw Township,
274
00:14:08.539 --> 00:14:24.370
Jefferson County, 2009. Increased levels of sodium chlorides in total
275
00:14:24.409 --> 00:14:26.600
dissolved solids. This looks like there was some type of
276
00:14:26.700 --> 00:14:31.200
impact at that time because the sodium would have come
277
00:14:31.220 --> 00:14:34.450
from the drilling itself. I don't remember what it was,
278
00:14:34.490 --> 00:14:36.850
but it appears there was a temporary impact on this one.
279
00:14:36.870 --> 00:14:39.250
But again, I wasn't looking at the types of things
280
00:14:39.289 --> 00:14:41.080
we're doing now and what you're talking about. But that
281
00:14:41.460 --> 00:14:42.980
is included.
282
00:14:43.019 --> 00:14:46.580
When you read the EPA report on hydraulic fracturing and
283
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:49.059
the effects of it, we are talking about from the
284
00:14:49.139 --> 00:14:52.500
surface spills, we're talking about exactly where.
285
00:14:52.220 --> 00:14:54.039
Something might go wrong. And you even mentioned.
286
00:14:54.120 --> 00:14:57.139
I stand firm on what we've done at Seneca that
287
00:14:57.159 --> 00:14:58.139
we have not had those issues.
288
00:14:58.960 --> 00:15:00.820
But then you read the letter and it... No, because
289
00:15:00.860 --> 00:15:02.470
this is not fracking. That's what I'm saying.
290
00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:04.450
It wasn't, and it didn't have the process of fracking
291
00:15:04.549 --> 00:15:05.090
within it.
292
00:15:05.289 --> 00:15:09.230
It probably fracked as well. But this was not anything
293
00:15:09.250 --> 00:15:10.730
that had to do with fracking. It looks to me
294
00:15:10.769 --> 00:15:12.470
as though with that it would have probably been some
295
00:15:12.490 --> 00:15:14.720
type of surface spill next to a... Was it a
296
00:15:14.750 --> 00:15:16.360
spring again? Yeah, it was a spring on that.
297
00:15:16.440 --> 00:15:20.740
And why were there spills into people's water supply?
298
00:15:21.279 --> 00:15:22.100
Why did it happen?
299
00:15:22.620 --> 00:15:24.120
And they were related to surface spills.
300
00:15:24.179 --> 00:15:28.379
Yeah, it was a... very careless act by a contractor
301
00:15:28.419 --> 00:15:31.039
on the location that spilled that one that temporarily impacted
302
00:15:31.059 --> 00:15:35.159
that spring so yes it did happen I'm not making
303
00:15:35.240 --> 00:15:39.059
light of it it wasn't willful it was an accident
304
00:15:40.279 --> 00:15:43.450
but this was this was one incident that happened that
305
00:15:43.529 --> 00:15:45.769
year out of 300 and some wells that were drilled
306
00:15:45.789 --> 00:15:47.230
and it didn't happen every year but I would say
307
00:15:47.269 --> 00:15:52.110
we probably averaged maybe one or so some years maybe
308
00:15:52.129 --> 00:15:53.669
two some years maybe not but maybe one a year
309
00:15:53.690 --> 00:15:55.789
something like this would happen with a 300 well program
310
00:15:56.269 --> 00:15:59.120
when the regulations were very lax compared to what they
311
00:15:59.139 --> 00:15:59.519
are now.
312
00:15:59.960 --> 00:16:02.220
So that's what it takes to get these guys to
313
00:16:02.259 --> 00:16:05.519
agree to publicly confirmed facts that you can find on
314
00:16:05.539 --> 00:16:09.899
the internet. Now, about those regulations Doug mentioned at the end?
315
00:16:10.519 --> 00:16:13.000
We're not going to go into the details of how
316
00:16:13.100 --> 00:16:16.250
regulations on fracking have changed in different parts of America
317
00:16:16.500 --> 00:16:20.710
or the world. But regulations on fracking continue to get tighter.
318
00:16:20.909 --> 00:16:23.909
And looking around us today at Seneca's storage site and
319
00:16:23.929 --> 00:16:26.759
the fracking site... you can see the effects of them.
320
00:16:27.340 --> 00:16:30.460
Here at the site, there was lining under everything. Those
321
00:16:30.679 --> 00:16:33.879
water coolers that were filled with waste, they were sitting
322
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:36.730
on what looked like a giant kid's swimming pool made
323
00:16:36.769 --> 00:16:39.210
out of metal, and then under that was another layer
324
00:16:39.230 --> 00:16:39.870
of protection.
325
00:16:40.370 --> 00:16:43.149
You have to have containment in case a tank would
326
00:16:43.549 --> 00:16:44.549
have some type of failure.
327
00:16:44.830 --> 00:16:47.980
And all of this was designed to stop a leak if, say,
328
00:16:48.059 --> 00:16:50.600
something busted out of one of those water containers.
329
00:16:51.700 --> 00:16:52.120
Conclusion.
330
00:16:53.070 --> 00:16:57.049
Chemicals used in fracking can contaminate drinking water. They leak
331
00:16:57.070 --> 00:17:00.580
through damaged pipes or spills up on the surface. But
332
00:17:00.620 --> 00:17:06.960
from what we know, these instances are rare. OK, so
333
00:17:07.160 --> 00:17:09.980
the scary stuff used in fracking doesn't get into drinking
334
00:17:10.019 --> 00:17:13.119
water very often. But when it does, will it make
335
00:17:13.140 --> 00:17:16.859
you sick? After the break, I drink some fracking chemicals
336
00:17:17.039 --> 00:17:20.289
and we find out... No, I'm definitely not going to
337
00:17:20.309 --> 00:17:22.619
do that. But we will talk to scientists about the
338
00:17:22.660 --> 00:17:35.609
potential health risks. Hey, it's Wendy from Science Versus, and
339
00:17:35.630 --> 00:17:38.170
I want to tell you about a podcast that I love,
340
00:17:38.410 --> 00:17:41.539
Science Friday. They cover all sorts of amazing things in
341
00:17:41.579 --> 00:17:45.500
the weird and wonderful world of science, from how concussions
342
00:17:45.599 --> 00:17:48.720
affect our brain to the inner secrets of a snake
343
00:17:48.940 --> 00:17:51.180
with a spider on its tail. tail. It's a lot
344
00:17:51.220 --> 00:17:53.920
of news that you can use and some that you can't,
345
00:17:54.049 --> 00:17:55.170
but you're going to love anyway.
346
00:17:55.410 --> 00:17:58.569
It's hosted by Ira Flato and Flora Lichtman.
347
00:17:58.730 --> 00:18:01.430
Who is an old friend of the show and loves
348
00:18:01.529 --> 00:18:04.130
a pun as much as we do. Science Friday is
349
00:18:04.190 --> 00:18:06.750
on every day, wherever you get your podcasts.
350
00:18:08.799 --> 00:18:10.180
Welcome back to Science Versus.
351
00:18:10.799 --> 00:18:13.519
So we talked about how fracking chemicals can get into
352
00:18:13.539 --> 00:18:15.980
your water, and we're going to get to the environmental
353
00:18:16.079 --> 00:18:18.920
impacts of fracking just a bit later. But let's start
354
00:18:18.960 --> 00:18:22.240
where we left off. The scary stuff in fracking can
355
00:18:22.329 --> 00:18:25.869
get into drinking water. But if that happens, will it
356
00:18:25.890 --> 00:18:29.710
make you sick? Some of you listening have seen scary
357
00:18:29.809 --> 00:18:33.130
footage of people lighting their water on fire and they
358
00:18:33.190 --> 00:18:34.609
say fracking is to blame.
359
00:18:35.589 --> 00:18:37.349
Footage like this.
360
00:18:37.809 --> 00:18:40.029
Unbelievable, a river on fire.
361
00:18:40.430 --> 00:18:44.450
In this video, an Australian politician fashioned after Steve Irwin
362
00:18:44.869 --> 00:18:46.970
lights a match and puts it to a river and
363
00:18:47.069 --> 00:18:48.710
flames leap up from the water.
364
00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:50.579
It's all very dramatic.
365
00:18:51.140 --> 00:18:51.579
Whoa!
366
00:18:52.900 --> 00:18:56.779
The fracking just a kilometre away, methane coming up, and
367
00:18:56.900 --> 00:18:59.180
now the river is alight.
368
00:18:59.519 --> 00:19:02.539
This video is real and the water is burning because methane,
369
00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:05.700
the main ingredient in natural gas, is flammable. And it
370
00:19:05.740 --> 00:19:08.319
can end up in water supplies because when you're fracking
371
00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:11.660
and trying to capture all that natural gas underground, some
372
00:19:11.700 --> 00:19:14.420
of it leaks through the pipes and can escape. But
373
00:19:14.480 --> 00:19:17.339
just because something is flammable, it doesn't mean it's bad
374
00:19:17.400 --> 00:19:20.710
for you. pistachio nuts are flammable.
375
00:19:21.450 --> 00:19:25.640
Fun fact, right? Oh, the pistachio nuts are on fire.
376
00:19:27.480 --> 00:19:32.420
Anyway, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, quote,
377
00:19:32.980 --> 00:19:37.420
drinking water or eating food prepared with water containing methane
378
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:41.630
gas is not a health hazard, end quote. The CDC
379
00:19:41.769 --> 00:19:45.049
also says that methane leaves the water and enters the
380
00:19:45.170 --> 00:19:48.000
air very quickly So even if there was a lot
381
00:19:48.019 --> 00:19:51.519
of methane, quote, it is unlikely that this level would
382
00:19:51.559 --> 00:19:54.059
remain in the water long enough to be ingested.
383
00:19:54.599 --> 00:19:55.119
End quote.
384
00:19:56.140 --> 00:20:01.069
So that's methane. What about the chemicals used in fracking operations?
385
00:20:01.369 --> 00:20:04.109
We talked about a few of them already. The bactericide,
386
00:20:04.210 --> 00:20:06.970
the friction reducers. Are they okay to drink?
387
00:20:07.950 --> 00:20:09.049
Well, no.
388
00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:13.259
An Australian team of researchers recently bathed some cells from
389
00:20:13.279 --> 00:20:16.359
the human intestine in the water and chemical mix used
390
00:20:16.400 --> 00:20:21.369
in fracking. And it killed the cells. The mix was toxic.
391
00:20:22.349 --> 00:20:26.950
But you would never drink this mix straight. If fracking
392
00:20:27.009 --> 00:20:29.589
water was coming out of your tap, it would be
393
00:20:29.690 --> 00:20:32.819
cut with lots and lots of fresh water. And as
394
00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:35.920
a general rule, the more diluted things get, the safer
395
00:20:35.940 --> 00:20:39.670
they get. So when this same team of Australian researchers
396
00:20:40.049 --> 00:20:43.930
diluted the fracking mix by five times, the test couldn't
397
00:20:43.970 --> 00:20:47.170
pick up any damage to the cells. And the researchers
398
00:20:47.250 --> 00:20:49.509
pointed out that the water coming out of your tap
399
00:20:49.609 --> 00:20:54.210
would actually be way more diluted than that. But they
400
00:20:54.250 --> 00:20:57.410
wrote in their paper that if you were exposed chronically
401
00:20:57.869 --> 00:21:00.549
over time to the diluted chemicals in fracking.
402
00:21:01.450 --> 00:21:02.339
It might change the game.
403
00:21:03.079 --> 00:21:06.039
Plus, cells in a petri dish versus the body, that's
404
00:21:06.099 --> 00:21:08.900
very different. So to get to the bottom of these
405
00:21:08.940 --> 00:21:13.099
health questions, we need to look at another kind of study. Say,
406
00:21:13.480
--> 00:21:20.009
a survey of people living near fracking wells. Peter Rabinowitz,
407
00:21:20.170 --> 00:21:23.210
a physician and an associate professor at the University of Washington,
408
00:21:23.609 --> 00:21:27.490
has done just that. He started studying fracking after a
409
00:21:27.569 --> 00:21:31.190
visit to southwestern Pennsylvania when he spoke to one family
410
00:21:31.599 --> 00:21:34.839
that claimed to have been affected by fracking operations nearby.
411
00:21:34.859 --> 00:21:38.500
The family told Peter that the drilling company had said
412
00:21:38.519 --> 00:21:40.200
that the water was fine.
413
00:21:40.480 --> 00:21:42.119
And it certainly didn't look that way to me, and
414
00:21:42.160 --> 00:21:44.420
they definitely said that it had changed in some way.
415
00:21:44.869 --> 00:21:47.430
And then they gave interesting anecdotes that I was not
416
00:21:47.549 --> 00:21:51.529
sure what to make of about how when they tried
417
00:21:51.549 --> 00:21:53.950
to give water to their dog, the dog refused to
418
00:21:53.990 --> 00:21:57.759
drink from the bowl, or another dog drank some of
419
00:21:57.799 --> 00:22:00.079
the water and got sick and its hair fell out.
420
00:22:02.480 --> 00:22:06.490
It's a scary story. Dodgy fracking company. Dog's hair falling out.
421
00:22:07.390 --> 00:22:11.490
Peter was intrigued. But he's a scientist. And this was
422
00:22:11.529 --> 00:22:12.150
an anecdote.
423
00:22:13.029 --> 00:22:15.240
So he got a team together and they surveyed the
424
00:22:15.299 --> 00:22:20.500
health of 180 households in the area. Ultimately, he found
425
00:22:20.779 --> 00:22:24.019
no link between living near a fracking site and the
426
00:22:24.059 --> 00:22:27.970
people reporting that they had heart, brain or stomach problems.
427
00:22:28.609 --> 00:22:32.309
But he did find something. two issues were more likely
428
00:22:32.349 --> 00:22:35.150
to be reported in those living within one kilometre of
429
00:22:35.210 --> 00:22:39.190
a fracking drill compared to those living further away. One,
430
00:22:39.880 --> 00:22:40.599
skin problems.
431
00:22:40.910 --> 00:22:44.779
Which included generalised rashes or itching of the skin.
432
00:22:45.079 --> 00:22:47.259
And two, upper respiratory complaints.
433
00:22:47.519 --> 00:22:51.359
Which could be burning eyes or cough or sore throats.
434
00:22:51.660 --> 00:22:54.660
But Peter says just because he found those issues, that
435
00:22:54.759 --> 00:22:58.329
doesn't mean the chemicals in fracking or fracking operations caused them.
436
00:22:58.670 --> 00:23:01.440
It's a correlation at this point. which means that there
437
00:23:01.480 --> 00:23:04.559
is a very real risk that these issues could be
438
00:23:04.619 --> 00:23:13.569
caused by something else, the nacebo effect. This is like
439
00:23:13.589 --> 00:23:17.950
the placebo effect's evil twin sister, where just believing that
440
00:23:17.990 --> 00:23:21.730
something will make you sick actually does. And so powerful
441
00:23:21.829 --> 00:23:24.930
is the nacebo and the placebo effect that every medical
442
00:23:24.990 --> 00:23:28.190
study has to consider them. And according to Peter, the
443
00:23:28.210 --> 00:23:32.250
circumstances surrounding fracking... are a perfect storm for this kind
444
00:23:32.289 --> 00:23:32.569
of thing.
445
00:23:32.829 --> 00:23:35.079
Things have happened so rapidly that there's a lack of
446
00:23:35.210 --> 00:23:38.799
information flowing. I think it's more likely that people start
447
00:23:38.859 --> 00:23:43.140
fearing the worst and thinking that there could be unknown
448
00:23:43.200 --> 00:23:45.380
hazards that they, again, are being exposed to.
449
00:23:45.779 --> 00:23:48.259
So it could be that people's fears about fracking are
450
00:23:48.279 --> 00:23:51.559
making them anxious and stressed and bringing on those rashes.
451
00:23:52.319 --> 00:23:53.859
But it could also be the fracking chemicals.
452
00:23:54.670 --> 00:23:58.029
So with this in mind, Peter also asked residents about
453
00:23:58.049 --> 00:24:00.829
the health of their farm animals and their pets. Because
454
00:24:01.109 --> 00:24:02.829
while your dog might be very smart.
455
00:24:03.029 --> 00:24:05.390
We don't expect that they're going to read the newspaper
456
00:24:05.509 --> 00:24:08.410
or listen to the radio and have preconceptions about whether
457
00:24:08.450 --> 00:24:09.339
they're sick or not.
458
00:24:09.980 --> 00:24:13.240
He looked at a range of domestic animals. Dogs, cats, fish.
459
00:24:13.380 --> 00:24:17.380
Someone even had a pet raccoon. Who has a pet raccoon?
460
00:24:18.319 --> 00:24:21.279
Pocahontas had a pet raccoon. Come on, Miko!
461
00:24:25.410 --> 00:24:26.730
Overall, good news for Miko.
462
00:24:27.089 --> 00:24:29.950
He found that pets living near fracking wells weren't any
463
00:24:30.009 --> 00:24:35.089
sicker than animals living further away. But when he analysed
464
00:24:35.130 --> 00:24:38.549
the results focusing on the dogs, he found that they
465
00:24:38.650 --> 00:24:41.150
were more likely to have skin problems if they lived
466
00:24:41.250 --> 00:24:44.950
closer to the fracking wells. Peter wanted to know more,
467
00:24:45.380 --> 00:24:47.859
so a year after his survey, he returned to the
468
00:24:47.920 --> 00:24:49.579
households to get more data.
469
00:24:49.980 --> 00:24:52.799
We asked someone in the household to provide a urine
470
00:24:52.819 --> 00:24:55.279
specimen and also to get a urine specimen from a
471
00:24:55.319 --> 00:24:56.039
dog in the house.
472
00:24:56.599 --> 00:24:59.180
Just in general, you knock on someone's door and say,
473
00:24:59.400 --> 00:25:00.960
remember me from a year ago.
474
00:25:01.140 --> 00:25:02.299
Can I get some urine?
475
00:25:03.940 --> 00:25:07.680
It's an interesting conversation to have. And some people say
476
00:25:07.720 --> 00:25:09.599
yes and some people say no.
And then when you
477
00:25:09.660 --> 00:25:12.339
ask to get a sample from the dog, it gets
478
00:25:12.420 --> 00:25:14.579
even more interesting. They're not used to doing that.
479
00:25:15.940 --> 00:25:19.299
Peter is currently looking into this data. So where does
480
00:25:19.319 --> 00:25:24.140
that leave us? What is the scientific answer? Are chemicals
481
00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:27.400
from fracking making us sick?
482
00:25:29.180 --> 00:25:33.039
There may be something here and we need to have further,
483
00:25:33.079 --> 00:25:36.319
better studies to investigate it further.
484
00:25:37.839 --> 00:25:38.299
Conclusion.
485
00:25:38.619 --> 00:25:41.059
If there was a major chemical spill onto your property's
486
00:25:41.099 --> 00:25:42.880
water and the water looked different.
487
00:25:43.690 --> 00:25:45.109
it's probably not a good.
488
00:25:45.009 --> 00:25:47.799
Idea to drink it because high doses of fracking fluid
489
00:25:47.880 --> 00:25:50.299
are likely to be toxic. But in terms of whether
490
00:25:50.319 --> 00:25:56.299
you'll get sick from smaller, say, harder-to-detect leaks, currently there's
491
00:25:56.339 --> 00:26:01.359
not good evidence that you will. Next up on our
492
00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:04.259
journey into fears about fracking, we're moving away from the
493
00:26:04.319 --> 00:26:07.650
personal and asking, what is fracking doing to the world
494
00:26:07.710 --> 00:26:08.190
around us?
495
00:26:08.930 --> 00:26:11.089
Like, is it causing earthquakes?
496
00:26:12.170 --> 00:26:16.390
Some parts of the US, including Texas, Colorado, Oklahoma and Arkansas,
497
00:26:16.450 --> 00:26:17.230
have experienced.
498
00:26:18.130 --> 00:26:21.619
Oh, sorry. I'm going to get letters about that. Should
499
00:26:21.630 --> 00:26:22.559
have been Colorado.
500
00:26:22.579 --> 00:26:27.299
OK, so some parts of the US, including Texas, Colorado,
501
00:26:27.500 --> 00:26:32.220
Oklahoma and Arkansas, have experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquakes
502
00:26:32.380 --> 00:26:37.250
since 2009. And unprecedented, that's not my word. It comes
503
00:26:37.349 --> 00:26:41.849
from a paper published in Science magazine. And Professor Robert Jackson...
504
00:26:42.220 --> 00:26:46.960
He says these earthquakes are worth getting shook up about. Obviously,
505
00:26:47.180 --> 00:26:50.240
he didn't use those words. He doesn't talk in puns.
506
00:26:51.119 --> 00:26:54.980
It gets people's attention when someone has to start paying
507
00:26:55.009 --> 00:26:56.890
for earthquake insurance when they didn't even know what an
508
00:26:56.910 --> 00:26:58.609
earthquake was probably.
509
00:26:58.170 --> 00:26:59.049
A decade ago.
510
00:26:59.069 --> 00:27:02.509
That is really remarkable, and that is not natural.
511
00:27:02.829 --> 00:27:03.109
Yes.
512
00:27:03.789 --> 00:27:07.470
Robert says frackers are responsible for the increase in earthquakes,
513
00:27:08.190 --> 00:27:10.049
but not for
the reason that you might think.
514
00:27:10.950 --> 00:27:11.849
I'll let Robert explain.
515
00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:13.099
Oinky boink.
516
00:27:13.599 --> 00:27:14.299
Wrong audio.
517
00:27:14.619 --> 00:27:17.740
It's not this step of cracking open the rock that's
518
00:27:17.819 --> 00:27:21.549
causing those earthquakes. That does cause little tiny tremors, but
519
00:27:21.609 --> 00:27:24.890
no one feels those. What's causing some of these earthquakes
520
00:27:24.950 --> 00:27:27.789
instead is the disposal of the wastewater.
521
00:27:27.809 --> 00:27:30.750
Okay, so, wastewater.
522
00:27:32.369 --> 00:27:35.089
Remember, that's the dirty water that comes back up the
523
00:27:35.150 --> 00:27:38.720
pipe after you frack the rocks. Now, you can deal
524
00:27:38.789 --> 00:27:40.910
with that water in a couple of different ways. You
525
00:27:40.930 --> 00:27:43.990
can store it above ground in those giant water coolers.
526
00:27:44.430 --> 00:27:47.769
You can recycle it, use it for more fracking. But
527
00:27:48.029 --> 00:27:50.789
it's just a lot of water to deal with. So
528
00:27:50.849 --> 00:27:55.369
sometimes the fracking companies just shove it right back underground
529
00:27:55.990 --> 00:27:58.250
into what's called a deep injection well.
530
00:27:58.990 --> 00:28:00.950
And those wells are the problem.
531
00:28:01.309 --> 00:28:04.490
What's causing some of these earthquakes is the disposal of
532
00:28:04.539 --> 00:28:10.000
the wastewater. When we pump millions of gallons of wastewater
533
00:28:10.079 --> 00:28:13.619
back underground at high pressure, it can cause rock layers
534
00:28:13.680 --> 00:28:19.140
to slip. It essentially lubricates those rock layers, and that slipping.
535
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:19.980
Is an earthquake.
536
00:28:21.849 --> 00:28:26.329
So, pouring wastewater from fracking down an underground disposal well
537
00:28:26.410 --> 00:28:30.809
can and is causing earthquakes in some places. Huh, that
538
00:28:30.829 --> 00:28:34.119
was an easy one. But here's a tricky one. How
539
00:28:34.210 --> 00:28:39.079
is fracking impacting climate change? The sweet fuel we get
540
00:28:39.140 --> 00:28:43.220
from fracking, natural gas, is in one way great for
541
00:28:43.240 --> 00:28:43.779
the climate.
542
00:28:44.299 --> 00:28:46.839
It doesn't emit much carbon dioxide when it's burnt.
543
00:28:47.900 --> 00:28:53.690
But the main ingredient of natural gas, methane, is not
544
00:28:53.730 --> 00:28:54.849
that great for the climate.
545
00:28:55.549 --> 00:28:57.390
It's a greenhouse gas and it.
546
00:28:57.410 --> 00:29:03.309
Traps heat very effectively, more effectively than carbon dioxide.
547
00:29:03.759 --> 00:29:07.359
Natural gas is mostly methane, and methane's an incredibly potent
548
00:29:07.380 --> 00:29:08.140
greenhouse gas.
549
00:29:08.359 --> 00:29:11.019
This is Bob Howarth, and he's an ecology professor at
550
00:29:11.079 --> 00:29:14.769
Cornell University.
Bob says that when fracking companies are trying
551
00:29:14.809 --> 00:29:17.990
to capture the natural gas, some of it escapes, becoming
552
00:29:18.109 --> 00:29:20.410
what's known as fugitive methane.
553
00:29:21.210 --> 00:29:26.089
No, seriously. That's the scientific term for it. Fugitive methane.
554
00:29:26.950 --> 00:29:32.339
Like the fugitive. The one-armed man. But for methane. Do-do-do-do.
555
00:29:34.509 --> 00:29:37.640
It's a really bad whammy for the climate. Even very
556
00:29:37.759 --> 00:29:41.750
small emissions of methane to the atmosphere are globally important
557
00:29:41.789 --> 00:29:43.230
in terms of global warming.
558
00:29:43.549 --> 00:29:48.170
Fugitive methane is obviously problematic. But the question is, how
559
00:29:48.230 --> 00:29:51.759
much methane is actually leaking into the atmosphere from fracking?
560
00:29:52.470 --> 00:29:55.720
And this question, just like the question of how much
561
00:29:55.779 --> 00:29:59.670
fracking chemicals are getting into people's water... is really tricky
562
00:29:59.769 --> 00:30:04.099
to answer. For one, the science is pretty new. Bob
563
00:30:04.150 --> 00:30:06.400
published the first paper to look at this, and it
564
00:30:06.440 --> 00:30:10.420
wasn't that long ago, in 2011. And back then, his
565
00:30:10.480 --> 00:30:14.900
calculations made the picture look bad for fracking. But that
566
00:30:14.940 --> 00:30:18.400
was just one paper. So Bob went searching for more data.
567
00:30:18.839 --> 00:30:22.619
He got in a plane, hunting for plumes of fugitive methane.
568
00:30:26.380 --> 00:30:29.579
We used an airplane and we flew over southwestern Pennsylvania
569
00:30:29.599 --> 00:30:33.180
in the Marcellus Shale area. The pilot flew back and
570
00:30:33.220 --> 00:30:38.349
forth measuring methane in real time. And he was able
571
00:30:38.390 --> 00:30:42.470
to determine plumes, they're clearly visible when you plot the
572
00:30:42.490 --> 00:30:45.710
data out, that are coming from distinct points on the ground.
573
00:30:46.210 --> 00:30:48.960
Using the data that Bob collected, along with other work,
574
00:30:49.400 --> 00:30:53.079
He estimates that in parts of America, around 9% of
575
00:30:53.119 --> 00:30:56.609
the methane that companies are trying to capture escapes during
576
00:30:56.619 --> 00:31:00.930
the entire fracking process. But lots of folks cite lower
577
00:31:00.990 --> 00:31:04.410
numbers than Bob's. And much of this is because fugitive
578
00:31:04.450 --> 00:31:08.789
methane emissions fluctuate wildly, depending on a lot of factors,
579
00:31:08.930 --> 00:31:12.049
like the type of rocks in an area. Either way,
580
00:31:12.529 --> 00:31:15.609
whatever the number is, it isn't very helpful in isolation.
581
00:31:16.109 --> 00:31:20.329
The important question for us right now is this. Is
582
00:31:20.430 --> 00:31:25.279
natural gas production, which obviously includes fracking, better for the
583
00:31:25.339 --> 00:31:30.339
climate than our other big fuel source, coal? If Bob's
584
00:31:30.440 --> 00:31:35.339
fugitive methane estimates are correct, then no, natural gas is
585
00:31:35.440 --> 00:31:40.460
worse than coal. But the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
586
00:31:40.500 --> 00:31:45.940
which represents the views of over 800 scientists from 80 countries, disagrees.
587
00:31:47.190 --> 00:31:51.089
Every few years, these scientists analyse the most up-to-date research on,
588
00:31:51.269 --> 00:31:54.680
among other things, how energy production is affecting climate change.
589
00:31:55.259 --> 00:31:58.140
And at their last report, they labelled natural gas, the
590
00:31:58.180 --> 00:32:03.400
fuel from fracking, as a transition fuel. That is something
591
00:32:03.480 --> 00:32:07.119
that's better than coal. But over the years, as more
592
00:32:07.160 --> 00:32:10.369
and more data has been coming out on fugitive methane emissions,
593
00:32:10.829 --> 00:32:14.289
the IPCC has been giving less and less love to
594
00:32:14.349 --> 00:32:18.779
natural gas. So after reading the IPCC reports and chatting
595
00:32:18.819 --> 00:32:20.920
to Bob, I didn't know what to think.
596
00:32:21.480 --> 00:32:23.099
I talked to Robert Jackson at Stanford.
597
00:32:23.779 --> 00:32:26.579
This has like been exploding my brain a little bit
598
00:32:26.660 --> 00:32:32.769
because you have even the IPCC, like over time, I
599
00:32:32.809 --> 00:32:35.269
feel like they've been moving on this as well and saying, oh,
600
00:32:35.289 --> 00:32:36.869
we didn't realize the methane leaks were bad.
601
00:32:36.990 --> 00:32:38.349
Natural gas is worse than we thought.
602
00:32:38.369 --> 00:32:41.779
But where do you think we're currently sitting on this
603
00:32:42.160 --> 00:32:44.619
methane leakage question when it comes to fracking?
604
00:32:45.730 --> 00:32:48.279
Our work, the work of many people, has shown quite
605
00:32:48.359 --> 00:32:52.539
clearly that we've been underestimating the leaks on average, not everywhere,
606
00:32:53.079 --> 00:32:58.279
but on average. That doesn't mean that that number, that
607
00:32:58.299 --> 00:33:02.900
that leakage is so large that it negates any potential
608
00:33:02.940 --> 00:33:06.369
benefits compared to coal or that it's far worse than coal.
609
00:33:07.720 --> 00:33:10.009
I just don't think the body of evidence suggests that
610
00:33:10.029 --> 00:33:10.650
to be the case.
611
00:33:11.440 --> 00:33:15.380
So, bottom line, to the question of natural gas versus coal?
612
00:33:15.880 --> 00:33:18.619
Point blank, I think natural gas is a better fuel
613
00:33:18.660 --> 00:33:21.920
than coal. Anytime we can take an old coal plant offline,
614
00:33:22.549 --> 00:33:23.269
I'm all for it.
615
00:33:23.990 --> 00:33:27.910
But of course, that's just compared to coal. Don't go
616
00:33:27.970 --> 00:33:32.410
buying your I Heart Fracking t-shirts just yet.
Practically everyone
617
00:33:32.450 --> 00:33:35.630
we spoke to agreed that renewables are the best option
618
00:33:35.710 --> 00:33:41.789
for reducing pollution and staving off climate change. Conclusion Methane
619
00:33:41.829 --> 00:33:45.210
from natural gas does escape into the atmosphere through fracking.
620
00:33:45.630 --> 00:33:48.430
And that's bad for the climate. It traps heat. It's
621
00:33:48.470 --> 00:33:49.849
a powerful greenhouse gas.
622
00:33:50.930 --> 00:33:55.519
But currently, the evidence suggests that even with that, natural
623
00:33:55.559 --> 00:33:57.259
gas is better than coal.
624
00:33:58.160 --> 00:34:03.299
But worse than renewables. So, our fears about fracking, do
625
00:34:03.460 --> 00:34:06.359
they stack up? Maybe?
626
00:34:07.700 --> 00:34:08.519
Not really.
627
00:34:10.019 --> 00:34:10.780
Let's break it down.
628
00:34:12.119 --> 00:34:16.440
Fear number one, can the chemicals from fracking contaminate people's water?
629
00:34:17.380 --> 00:34:23.659
Science says yes, but these instances are rare. Fear number two,
630
00:34:24.039 --> 00:34:29.860
can these chemicals make us sick? Science says yes, in
631
00:34:30.039 --> 00:34:33.099
high doses, but the amount that's likely to get into
632
00:34:33.139 --> 00:34:34.940
your water supply is small.
633
00:34:36.039 --> 00:34:38.760
And so far, and for now.
634
00:34:40.050 --> 00:34:44.440
evidence suggests that in these doses, people should be okay.
635
00:34:45.400 --> 00:34:50.239
Fear number three. Does fracking cause earthquakes? Science says.
636
00:34:51.679 --> 00:34:53.860
Here, there's almost no debate.
637
00:34:54.400 --> 00:34:57.519
Fracking sites that dispose of their wastewater by injecting it
638
00:34:57.619 --> 00:35:01.090
back into the ground, they can cause earthquakes.
639
00:35:01.949 --> 00:35:06.760
And fear number four. Will fracking destroy the climate? Science says....
640
00:35:08.050 --> 00:35:08.369
Well.
641
00:35:09.510 --> 00:35:10.920
It's not good for the climate.
642
00:35:11.760 --> 00:35:16.980
It's better than coal. It's worse than renewables. So, when
643
00:35:17.019 --> 00:35:20.260
you add all these points up, how bad is fracking?
644
00:35:21.179 --> 00:35:24.579
It's not an unmitigated evil. The science on many of
645
00:35:24.619 --> 00:35:29.420
these fears is uncertain. And that means that when anyone, anyone,
646
00:35:29.980 --> 00:35:33.090
comes out with some grand statement about the horrors of
647
00:35:33.139 --> 00:35:37.289
fracking or the greatness of fracking, those comments aren't based
648
00:35:37.389 --> 00:35:38.010
on science.
649
00:35:38.750 --> 00:35:42.940
But they do make for a good story. Remember Chief Thundercloud,
650
00:35:43.380 --> 00:35:44.019
James Hughes?
651
00:35:44.860 --> 00:35:47.960
Whatever happened to Chief Thundercloud?
652
00:35:48.019 --> 00:35:52.650
Where are his people? Where is the land of a free?
653
00:35:53.369 --> 00:35:57.670
We called him to
find out exactly what happened. And yeah,
654
00:35:58.269 --> 00:35:58.900
he told us.
655
00:35:58.880 --> 00:35:59.619
A good story.
656
00:36:00.090 --> 00:36:03.070
Well, it happened so fast, Wendy, I didn't expect it,
657
00:36:03.190 --> 00:36:06.750
and boom, boom, boom. I mean, they just basically, they
658
00:36:06.789 --> 00:36:10.309
started drilling next door, right, first, to my neighbor's ground.
659
00:36:11.269 --> 00:36:14.409
Next thing you know, boom, I had red water coming
660
00:36:14.449 --> 00:36:17.010
out of my faucet, and I went, what in the
661
00:36:17.070 --> 00:36:18.170
world's going on?
662
00:36:18.510 --> 00:36:20.030
And yes, we checked it out.
663
00:36:20.469 --> 00:36:24.570
We contacted Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection, who confirmed that
664
00:36:24.630 --> 00:36:28.239
James's water did change color. The DEP said in their
665
00:36:28.280 --> 00:36:31.199
report that by releasing iron from the rocks, the drilling
666
00:36:31.239 --> 00:36:34.199
process had turned the pond a reddish-brown colour.
667
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:37.679
And according to James, that was just the beginning.
668
00:36:38.409 --> 00:36:39.949
So, wow.
669
00:36:40.590 --> 00:36:44.750
Seneca, they drilled me a new water well. And when
670
00:36:44.769 --> 00:36:48.409
they were putting the new plumbing in, somebody lit up
671
00:36:48.630 --> 00:36:50.070
a match for a cigarette.
672
00:36:50.750 --> 00:36:51.179
Poof!
673
00:36:51.300 --> 00:36:53.099
We had almost like an explosion.
674
00:36:53.940 --> 00:36:56.639
The DEP report doesn't mention the fire, but it does
675
00:36:56.719 --> 00:36:59.420
mention that the new water well initially had high levels
676
00:36:59.480 --> 00:37:03.539
of methane, which returned to normal after some months. Seneca's
677
00:37:03.599 --> 00:37:06.389
Rob Boulware told us, quote, He also said that Seneca
678
00:37:06.409 --> 00:37:09.250
accepted the DEP's resolution, but, quote, Mr Hughes was not
679
00:37:09.269 --> 00:37:10.550
fully satisfied with that result.
680
00:37:23.590 --> 00:37:24.030
End quote.
681
00:37:24.889 --> 00:37:27.070
That's why I don't like these guys, Wendy. These guys
682
00:37:27.170 --> 00:37:31.510
drill holes in the ground, puke up the land, ruin water,
683
00:37:31.570 --> 00:37:34.730
have a bad attitude. Then us poor landowners got to go,
684
00:37:34.769 --> 00:37:38.150
what just happened to us? Well, I'm one of these guys.
685
00:37:38.210 --> 00:37:40.670
I'm what you call a fighter. I don't like people
686
00:37:40.769 --> 00:37:43.090
stomping on me. I'm a Donald Trump kind of guy.
687
00:37:43.929 --> 00:37:46.289
The whole thing ended up in a legal battle and
688
00:37:46.309 --> 00:37:47.409
they settled out of court.
689
00:37:48.610 --> 00:37:52.989
So, compelling story, right? But remember the science?
690
00:37:53.849 --> 00:37:55.050
These events are rare.
691
00:37:55.070 --> 00:37:58.260
And the thing is, the scary stories, they get the
692
00:37:58.320 --> 00:38:00.400
headlines and they capture our imagination.
693
00:38:00.960 --> 00:38:04.199
But the science, it isn't that easy. It's complicated and
694
00:38:04.280 --> 00:38:07.610
slow and full of inconvenient details. And I know that's
695
00:38:07.659 --> 00:38:09.630
hard if you're at the pub and you're trying to
696
00:38:09.670 --> 00:38:13.130
have very strong opinions, but that's the way it is.
697
00:38:13.969 --> 00:38:16.570
And the thing is, if you do want an easy answer,
698
00:38:18.070 --> 00:38:19.820
I've got one YouTube video for you.
699
00:38:20.559 --> 00:38:22.699
Unbelievable! A river on fire!
700
00:38:23.530 --> 00:38:26.030
Don't let it burn the boat. Whoa!
701
00:38:27.789 --> 00:38:29.360
That's science versus fracking.
702
00:38:30.619 --> 00:38:33.699
This episode has been produced by Caitlin Kenny, Heather Rogers,
703
00:38:33.820 --> 00:38:37.119
Caitlin Sori, edited by Annie Rose Strasser and Alex Bloomberg.
704
00:38:37.460 --> 00:38:41.530
Production assistance by Austin Mitchell and fact-checking by Michelle Harris.
705
00:38:42.380 --> 00:38:45.539
Recordings from the town hall meeting in 2014 are from
706
00:38:45.679 --> 00:38:51.280
NPR's WHYY reporter, Katie Colaneri, and the team at NPR's
707
00:38:51.420 --> 00:38:52.900
State Impact Pennsylvania.
708
00:38:53.400 --> 00:38:53.860
Thank you.
709
00:38:54.300 --> 00:38:56.929
A big thanks to the Gimlet Hive Mind for comments
710
00:38:57.010 --> 00:39:00.449
and joke advisements. That's you, Eric Mennell, PJ Vogt and
711
00:39:00.489 --> 00:39:03.130
Stevie Lane, plus the Zuckerman family.
712
00:39:03.409 --> 00:39:07.280
Thank you. Sound design and music production by Matthew Bolt.
713
00:39:07.510 --> 00:39:11.559
Music written by Bobby Lord. Next time, attachment parenting.
714
00:39:25.880 --> 00:39:29.969
Next on Science Versus, we're tackling attachment parenting.
715
00:39:30.889 --> 00:39:33.369
In the first few months, it's like the fourth trimester
716
00:39:33.670 --> 00:39:36.809
and they should just be part of me. I just
717
00:39:36.869 --> 00:39:41.110
feel as though a stroller, when they're so small, it
718
00:39:41.150 --> 00:39:43.369
doesn't feel right. It just makes me cry to think
719
00:39:43.409 --> 00:39:44.929
like they're separated from me.
720
00:39:45.489 --> 00:39:47.940
I'm Wendy Zuckerman. Back to you next time.