תעתיק 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:00.239 --> 00:00:08.640
Today we're gonna be talking about prompt driven campaigns or if campaigns even have a right to exist anymore.
00:00:08.960 --> 00:00:18.000
He he explicitly said, look, the vision of meta is that they want to cut you off, which is uh uh the suck is not even hiding it.
00:00:18.320 --> 00:00:21.440
Is it such a privilege to not have to manage campaigns?
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:22.320
I'm not sure about that.
00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:25.440
Absolutely, it's certainly not a privilege.
00:00:25.679 --> 00:00:27.920
It destroyed my business yesterday.
00:00:28.239 --> 00:00:28.960
Oops.
00:00:29.120 --> 00:00:32.880
Um but I have to re-prompt it.
00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:33.039
Yes.
00:00:33.359 --> 00:00:37.920
Like, okay, so um all right, here's my brief again.
00:00:38.079 --> 00:00:42.000
And by the way, please don't my business.
00:00:55.119 --> 00:00:59.520
Or if campaigns even have a right to exist anymore.
00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:01.439
Heavy stuff, Chris.
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:02.479
Whoa.
00:01:03.039 --> 00:01:03.840
Hello, sir.
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:06.480
Hey, it's getting cold in here.
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:08.400
Prompt driven campaigns.
00:01:08.480 --> 00:01:09.120
Yeah.
00:01:09.760 --> 00:01:11.840
Well, what do you have for me today?
00:01:12.239 --> 00:01:13.200
It's not a new idea.
00:01:13.280 --> 00:01:18.079
It's not it's but it's there there's some momentum behind it.
00:01:18.319 --> 00:01:18.719
Yeah.
00:01:18.959 --> 00:01:24.480
I mean, we could probably trace it back to Google Marketing Live in 2023.
00:01:24.799 --> 00:01:25.200
Yes.
00:01:25.439 --> 00:01:38.560
And yeah, sorry, I'm I don't want to get ahead of myself too fast, but Google, I'm up and down on them because I just feel like they're lacking some execution power compared to some of their peers.
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:43.200
But um Google had this initial sort of vision.
00:01:43.280 --> 00:01:48.319
They talked back then about a conversational experience in the Google Ads UI.
00:01:49.280 --> 00:02:02.879
And the idea is that as you'd be creating a campaign, you would have this combination of things that you're used to doing, making a campaign, and prompting.
00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:14.159
Like you could provide a statement, sort of a brief about what your business is and does, what you sell, give your landing page, your goals.
00:02:14.319 --> 00:02:22.879
Yeah, some goals, maybe some assets, and that it would pick up the Slack and create ad groups appropriately.
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:29.280
Um write all your ad copy, generate additional images, all this kind of stuff.
00:02:29.439 --> 00:02:32.719
And that was the vision that they presented years ago now.
00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:34.080
They came a long way.
00:02:34.319 --> 00:02:35.520
Well, yeah.
00:02:35.759 --> 00:02:37.439
Have you heard about Ask Advisor?
00:02:38.080 --> 00:02:40.479
I don't know why why you so critic of me.
00:02:41.599 --> 00:02:44.560
Um you know, it's evolved the strategy.
00:02:44.719 --> 00:02:49.520
They do, they have they they have Ask Advisor or the Advisor Family, whatever it's called.
00:02:49.599 --> 00:02:50.159
Yeah.
00:02:50.400 --> 00:02:57.759
Um and they also have a feature that's that was announced at Google Marketing Live this year, I believe.
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.719
And uh is now it's in closed beta.
00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:03.280
Um, but it's called AI Briefs.
00:03:03.599 --> 00:03:04.240
Briefs, yes.
00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:08.719
And it it is a revision of the concept.
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:09.039
Yeah.
00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:19.599
But basically, people uh before we uh jump too much into detail, the idea of of prompting a campaign is not new.
00:03:19.919 --> 00:03:26.560
Um the visions out there from Google to ChatGPT, maybe we talk about their vision.
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:27.759
Quite ambitious one.
00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:30.000
Definitely again, very ambitious one.
00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:31.280
They're ambitious people, Chris.
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:32.639
Yes, absolutely.
00:03:32.800 --> 00:03:36.080
Uh scope versus capability, we talked about that in the last episode.
00:03:36.319 --> 00:03:36.639
That's right.
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:47.520
But in in general, Mike, do you do you see if if if executed correctly, if executed the right way, I'm talking from the perspective of app platforms.
00:03:47.840 --> 00:04:00.800
Could could there be an advantage to to agencies, in-house teams out there uh that prompting a campaign is maybe the right way to go down.
00:04:00.960 --> 00:04:03.360
Um what's your take on it?
00:04:03.919 --> 00:04:07.520
I mean, the the upside is potentially massive.
00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:12.960
Um like we'll talk to talk about AI briefs in more detail in a second.
00:04:13.120 --> 00:04:20.879
The way it's structured now is more focused on kind of alignment, and people have been pretty positive toward this so far.
00:04:21.040 --> 00:04:35.920
Um, but if you take these more future futuristic visions like from meta ads and chat GPT, which we'll talk about in a minute, um, they essentially talk about just cutting out all of yes, all of that work entirely.
00:04:36.000 --> 00:04:36.399
Yes.
00:04:36.639 --> 00:04:43.279
And naturally, for a business that would be very profitable to do that if it works that way.
00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:49.120
So the the upside theoretically is I don't want to say unbounded, but very large.
00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:56.319
Um and it's just I guess gonna be a question of theory versus reality, absolutely, and what do people really want?
00:04:56.480 --> 00:04:57.519
How much will they accept?
00:04:57.759 --> 00:04:59.199
Yeah, no doubt about that.
00:04:59.279 --> 00:05:07.920
And this is where I see uh we were kind of critical of Google the last episode, but this is where I see Google to be on a better path.
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:19.759
Yeah, because what what I see with Google, and but I can't by the
Load full transcript
way, I can still remember to that day um when I talked to Shane, uh one high, high-level guy at Google who really knows his thing.
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:23.519
Biggest respect for the for this for this guy, he knows his stuff.
00:05:23.759 --> 00:05:38.879
Um, and he basically was inviting the the leading agencies uh of Europe and he was talking to us and he he he explicitly said, look, the vision of Meta is that they want to cut you out, which is suck is not even hiding it, right?
00:05:39.040 --> 00:05:39.920
No, he's not hiding it.
00:05:40.079 --> 00:05:53.519
But Google said, look, of course they will forward integrated, of course they will push the ideas of making you capable to prompt campaigns and and cut out all the I don't know, boring operational stuff.
00:05:53.759 --> 00:05:56.000
But they want the expert to be in a loop.
00:05:56.160 --> 00:06:00.399
That statement was done, I think, one or one and a half years ago, and to this day I believe that.
00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:14.319
And you you literally see it because now circling back to the AI brief, I think it's not cutting out your control layers, it's it's it's not diminishing them, it just empowers you ideally to do things faster, more efficiently.
00:06:14.560 --> 00:06:15.839
Yeah, what's your take on it?
00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:17.279
Would you cover that?
00:06:17.600 --> 00:06:26.720
I mean, yes, and I would even say for we have to see how it evolves, but for the time being, it's the way I see it, adding a controller, in fact.
00:06:26.959 --> 00:06:38.240
Um because you know, right now it's for AI Max for search campaigns, and it will be coming out in the future for PMAX and AI Max shopping campaigns.
00:06:38.480 --> 00:06:46.560
Uh but the idea here is that AI Max is already has this very broad targeting.
00:06:46.720 --> 00:06:52.000
Um, it already has the capability to select landing pages, write ads.
00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:54.800
So it is very fully automated already.
00:06:55.040 --> 00:07:03.519
Um and it and that's a layer on top of a what could potentially be a much more manual and controlled campaign underneath it.
00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:06.079
So you add on this this layer on top of it.
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:14.240
And what AI Brief does in the first place is it helps you offer guidance to that.
00:07:14.319 --> 00:07:15.759
You know, you can tell it things.
00:07:15.920 --> 00:07:29.519
It's as if you'd be, if you would have a creative working for you, um, you would never tell them to just kind of like uh like here's my here's my website and just take it from there.
00:07:29.680 --> 00:07:31.279
You'd offer them a lot more.
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:32.240
You'd offer a brief.
00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:32.560
Yes.
00:07:32.720 --> 00:07:34.240
That's you know that's why it's called briefs.
00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:42.720
Um you you'd offer them guidance and it you'd say, for example, hey, we really it's important to us that we position ourselves premium.
00:07:42.879 -->
00:07:43.680
And yeah.
00:07:43.839 --> 00:07:55.040
And then if you'd find that your ads are triggering against keywords, including the word cheap, or that um like there's bargain showing up in your ad copy, that would be very concerning to you.
00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:55.519
Yes.
00:07:55.759 --> 00:08:07.600
And that is the kind of guidance with AI Briefs, you can you can give guidance that will give offer orientation or alignment to the AI in terms of messaging, matching, targeting, that kind of stuff.
00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:07.920
Yes.
00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:11.839
That's why I think the AI Brief is supporting the idea of Google.
00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:20.480
Yeah, which I really think is is is is seeing the the human expert very much in the loop.
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:21.839
Um, and I'm with you.
00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:26.639
It basically gives you the possibility to guard roll this highly automated campaign.
00:08:27.199 --> 00:08:29.680
Um, so I think this is a positive thing.
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:35.039
On a, from my perspective, rather, I don't know, negative thing.
00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:37.279
You know the name Asada One.
00:08:37.679 --> 00:08:39.120
Yes, I know him.
00:08:39.840 --> 00:08:44.720
I mean he he he said he he he leads monetization at uh OpenAI.
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:48.480
So basically, I assume he's running the ad strategy.
00:08:48.720 --> 00:08:49.840
Probably, yeah.
00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:54.559
I mean, big part of the monetization that that's where the money has to come come in, right?
00:08:54.639 --> 00:08:59.679
I mean, you want to be this 100 billion uh AR ads machinery.
00:08:59.919 --> 00:09:05.679
However, what I would love to understand here, it's pretty clear based on that interview.
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:16.480
Uh, maybe we can read some quotes uh from that interview, but it's pretty clear when we talk about prompting campaigns, yeah, the vision of ChatGPD is completely different compared to Google's.
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:17.679
Yes.
00:09:18.159 --> 00:09:20.720
Um it's much more like Meta's long-term vision.
00:09:21.039 --> 00:09:21.519
Exactly.
00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:21.840
Right.
00:09:22.159 --> 00:09:30.559
Because as far as I understand, Google Rob Google's roadmap is that yes, you prompt a campaign, but it is it is an additional control layer.
00:09:30.720 --> 00:09:35.840
And all that the entities and artifacts of the Google Ads ecosystem we we fell in love with.
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:40.639
The idea of having a campaign in the head crew, but it's it's it's there, it's still there.
00:09:40.799 --> 00:09:41.600
Yeah, yeah.
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:44.799
Shed some light on the vision of Chat GPD.
00:09:45.039 --> 00:09:47.600
Yeah, well, in in a it seems different.
00:09:47.840 --> 00:09:48.960
It's it's a bit different.
00:09:49.200 --> 00:10:00.639
In an in an interview with um Eric Seufert, um they shared yeah, an alternative view here, and they talked about prompt-driven campaigns.
00:10:00.879 --> 00:10:06.159
This idea that you can that you can prompt a campaign into being, into existence.
00:10:06.399 --> 00:10:18.000
Um and the first part sounds an awful lot like Google's conversational experience or something kind of like AI briefs.
00:10:18.240 --> 00:10:33.279
Um they they talk about giving, you know, giving a brief, which of course reminds us of AI briefs and having some optional text, uh a landing page, um, structured data like a feed.
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:38.559
So that that's all stuff that I can kind of say, okay, that does sound fair.
00:10:38.720 --> 00:10:39.919
I understand where he headed with that.
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:40.320
Okay.
00:10:40.639 --> 00:10:43.440
And it will draft a campaign or something like that.
00:10:43.679 --> 00:11:00.879
Um but where he quickly goes with this is that uh um he would actually he sees the campaign entity uh as you know, he asks, is campaign an important thing?
00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:05.200
Yes, the question alone it it's getting again cold.
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:09.360
Yeah, is campaign an important thing as an as an entity?
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:15.279
Um and I think most people listening is probably think, yeah, campaigns are marketing to a huge extent.
00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:17.120
Yes, they're marketing campaigns.
00:11:17.440 --> 00:11:21.279
Campaign is the is the engine of Google Ads of Meta.
00:11:21.759 --> 00:11:32.399
Um but his his view on this is that you could give one prompt and get a daily summary in a future state.
00:11:32.480 --> 00:11:35.519
And this reminds me a lot, again, we said this sounds like Meta's vision.
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:42.080
Mark Zuckerberg has said that basically you should give him a goal and then he'll give you some KPIs.
00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:44.240
Yes, and you don't have to do anything, no one has to do anything.
00:11:44.399 --> 00:11:46.799
Give me the budget and the goal, and we will do the rest for you.
00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:47.120
Exactly.
00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:50.879
Just to be to be because I think nuances matters, uh, matter.
00:11:51.279 --> 00:12:00.000
He literally said, I mean, the question alone, by the way, I love ChatGP to finally be really disruptive in the ads universe, but I don't know if this is landing the right way.
00:12:00.159 --> 00:12:03.519
And I don't know how many people read this interview in the first place, but we talk about it.
00:12:03.919 --> 00:12:06.639
So is campaign an important thing?
00:12:06.879 --> 00:12:09.600
Yes, it's there for some control.
00:12:10.080 --> 00:12:12.320
Hold on, dude, it's not there for some control.
00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:18.240
Every controller you ultimately have is cumulating in this campaign entity.
00:12:18.559 --> 00:12:18.960
Exactly.
00:12:19.120 --> 00:12:20.639
Uh, this this drives me.
00:12:20.879 --> 00:12:22.080
It creates some emotions here.
00:12:22.240 --> 00:12:33.039
But just express that and under the hood, it could get automatically
created because I do think having that ability to not have to manage these very low-level units is maybe the final future for us.
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:34.000
Low-level unit.
00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:34.159
Yes.
00:12:34.399 --> 00:12:36.240
A campaign is not a low-level unit, dude.
00:12:36.639 --> 00:12:36.879
Yeah.
00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:38.960
I mean yeah, yeah.
00:12:39.519 --> 00:12:39.840
Totally.
00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:46.720
And the the you're right, it's not yeah, it's not like we're talking about, you know, down to the keyword level or something.
00:12:46.879 --> 00:12:51.200
Um or even and saying like having the ability to not have to.
00:12:51.600 --> 00:12:51.840
Yes.
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:59.200
This is a strange phrasing, but uh I is it such a privilege to not have to manage campaigns?
00:12:59.360 --> 00:13:00.080
I'm not sure about that.
00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:03.120
Absolutely, it's certainly not a privilege.
00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:10.080
I I mean, I'm trying to even imagine what a campaignless world would look like.
00:13:10.320 --> 00:13:16.799
And I I mean, it's kind of like PMAX taken to the ultimate degree.
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:26.639
Like PMAX wants to automate as many functions and jobs of the campaign as possible.
00:13:26.879 --> 00:13:34.159
It has automated placements, automated creatives, automated targeting, increasingly automated budget.
00:13:34.399 --> 00:13:35.919
They're going in they're going in that direction.
00:13:36.080 --> 00:13:39.039
Certainly the allocation, and they even want to propose the budget for you.
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:40.480
But the sliders are there now.
00:13:40.799 --> 00:13:42.799
Yeah, they'll be don't don't forget that.
00:13:43.039 --> 00:13:45.200
Go back to our episode about PMAC sliders.
00:13:45.440 --> 00:14:01.840
But um, and I guess what he's proposing is this kind of Amoeba like thing where uh you know there'd be you'd have a budget and you'd have a goal, and everything else is just latent.
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:02.240
Yes.
00:14:02.639 --> 00:14:08.159
Um like like the the the creative will materialize in the instant.
00:14:08.480 --> 00:14:12.399
The ad, like you don't need to pre-build ads, the ad will just generate.
00:14:12.720 --> 00:14:21.360
Or like this is this is the ultimate when we talk about generative AI and starting with a prompt, that's where this would potentially go.
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:22.159
Yes.
00:14:22.559 --> 00:14:30.799
Look, I mean, I I think it's it's the that way of framing that vision lands way better with me.
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:38.639
I'm just saying that I are is ChatGBT in the position in the first place to talk about that vision, given the fact where they are right now.
00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:39.759
No, I'm not kidding, man.
00:14:40.159 --> 00:14:55.679
Because it it look again, I don't know how many people are reading this interview and how how many people are into this, but it if you look where where they are right now and then
he's throwing out that vision, I think it it's it's creating uh I don't know, insecurity for a lot of retailers.
00:14:55.759 --> 00:14:56.720
Because what does that mean?
00:14:57.200 --> 00:15:05.840
And how look, this step from where they are right now to to having a campaignless vision where you just prompt and everything will be done for you.
00:15:06.080 --> 00:15:09.600
Man, we're talking about yeah, years.
00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:13.120
Yeah, it's like uh it's like Star Trek to what they're doing right now.
00:15:13.360 --> 00:15:15.759
It strikes me completely the wrong way.
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:17.200
I I I I hear you.
00:15:17.279 --> 00:15:22.960
I mean to play devil's advocate in a way, this is what we always would have expected from OpenAI.
00:15:23.039 --> 00:15:32.879
Like in because in a way we you know, we see that they're doing ad groups and just very much copying um Google.
00:15:33.039 --> 00:15:33.600
Let's that's it.
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:40.399
Even uh yeah, Google of 10 years ago, yeah, with these you know very limited creative units and stuff like that.
00:15:40.559 --> 00:15:48.159
Um so to play a devil's advocate, maybe this is more what you would expect from an AI native ad platform.
00:15:48.559 --> 00:15:52.000
It would be at least disruptive because right now they are not disruptive in the ad space.
00:15:52.159 --> 00:16:10.080
No, no, yeah, but um anyway, anyway, I I think even even even even having the goal to really be be this disruptive player in the ads ads at ad space, which they have to be ultimately, because else I don't see them gaining any significant market share.
00:16:10.480 --> 00:16:17.759
Um, but still this this idea of removing any control there is shot it it's it's not going to land.
00:16:17.919 --> 00:16:18.879
I promise you that.
00:16:19.039 --> 00:16:20.320
Yeah, because I promise you that.
00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:20.559
Yeah.
00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:25.759
I mean to quote uh the criteria vallets, he you you please do do the quote for him.
00:16:25.919 --> 00:16:35.519
Oh yeah, I can't remember, but but yeah, I can't remember verbatim, but yeah, Fred Villet's uh an early Googler and now he's in the third-party ad tech space.
00:16:35.679 --> 00:16:42.080
And he wrote years back, uh, I think it was based on his observations of Google's tech and have from having worked there.
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:46.240
He said that Google always tries very hard to automate.
00:16:46.320 --> 00:16:49.120
Yes, then they realize that they have to roll back a bit.
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:54.399
Yes, either the market rejects it or the technology wasn't as capable as expected, but they have to roll back.
00:16:54.559 --> 00:16:56.320
But then you know, they're gonna try again.
00:16:56.559 --> 00:16:58.960
Then the next is move is happening, yes.
00:16:59.200 --> 00:17:05.599
And and they in the end, it is this kind of up, down, up, down, like or two steps forward, one step back.
00:17:05.839 --> 00:17:06.480
But
there's a trend.
00:17:06.640 --> 00:17:08.160
But they do trend forward on automation.
00:17:08.720 --> 00:17:09.519
I fully hear that.
00:17:09.599 --> 00:17:22.559
But however, I mean, if if they look, if they would look, if they had looked at Google and how they do it, I think that that vision also Mark Zuckerberg is aiming at to just give me the money and I will do the rest for you.
00:17:22.799 --> 00:17:24.960
I think it's it's it's not going to work.
00:17:25.119 --> 00:17:29.039
There will just no there will be no adoption for that idea.
00:17:29.599 --> 00:17:32.559
Because there are so many parties fundamentally against it.
00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:39.359
All the agencies, all the freelancers, all the true experts, and of course, first and foremost, the the online retailers and D2C players.
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:41.200
Yes, they want to have this control there.
00:17:41.839 --> 00:17:42.799
It triggers me.
00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:52.079
Yeah, I I mean I do think like it's if things are not going well, it's it's so hard to diagnose.
00:17:52.240 --> 00:17:52.480
Yes.
00:17:52.640 --> 00:17:58.559
And we talk about black boxes, and it's there's like, what entities are you referring to?
00:17:58.640 --> 00:17:58.960
Yes.
00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:03.200
Like how do you how do you get down to what happened?
00:18:03.279 --> 00:18:04.319
How do you change something?
00:18:04.480 --> 00:18:10.559
Because I guess the idea would be like, oh, it destroyed my business yesterday.
00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:11.680
Oops.
00:18:11.759 --> 00:18:14.000
Um where and how and what can I do about it?
00:18:14.240 --> 00:18:15.599
But I I have to reprompt it.
00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:20.559
Like, okay, so um, all right, here's my brief again.
00:18:20.799 --> 00:18:24.400
And by the way, please don't fuck up my business.
00:18:24.960 --> 00:18:35.599
You know, you you bring up a great point because the prompt, as powerful as it sounds, because it's feel it comes natural, it's it's conversational, but I mean it's hard to prompt.
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:38.160
It's it's it's hard to prompt in a deterministic way.
00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:42.079
It's it's hard to understand, okay, why did it didn't it land the right way?
00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:43.359
What do I have to change in my prompt?
00:18:43.759 --> 00:18:44.000
Exactly.
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:47.519
It's um it's it's the slightest idea to the I don't know.
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:50.400
Whatever.
00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:51.279
Yeah.
00:18:51.519 --> 00:18:52.720
But let's see.
00:18:53.039 --> 00:18:58.559
There's there's still before we wrap this topic up, we've left out one player, which is Meta themselves.
00:18:59.119 --> 00:19:07.279
Um and last week we talked about Meta Muse, and uh, it was actually already live at the time.
00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:10.000
I think it went live in late September.
00:19:10.240 --> 00:19:12.720
They they have something called Muse for SMBs.
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:13.680
SMBs, yeah.
00:19:14.000 --> 00:19:23.599
And um as prophesized, or no surprise here, like they want businesses to use Muse for ads management.
00:19:23.759 --> 00:19:31.519
And so this is also heavily stepping in the direction of prompt-driven campaigns or prompt-driven digital marketing.
00:19:31.680 --> 00:19:33.039
So it's very similar.
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:39.599
They say that basically this can draft your campaigns based on what you tell it.
00:19:39.680 --> 00:19:44.319
Yes, and it can also it can also draft um ads or posts.
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:46.880
It can do analytics.
00:19:47.200 --> 00:19:49.440
So that reminds me of Ask Advisor.
00:19:50.480 --> 00:19:53.680
Uh so this is this is the direction that they're going in.
00:19:53.839 --> 00:19:56.400
What I will say is that it's still human in the loop.
00:19:56.559 --> 00:19:57.440
Yes, that's the point.
00:19:57.680 --> 00:19:58.000
Important.
00:19:58.319 --> 00:19:58.799
That's the point.
00:19:58.960 --> 00:20:06.319
Again, I think the idea of prompting a campaign executed the right way can be massive.
00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:09.200
Yeah, a massive leverage for everyone.
00:20:09.680 --> 00:20:13.839
Executed the wrong way in terms of you just got out the human in the loop.
00:20:14.079 --> 00:20:16.880
And I want to quote another great guy I know.
00:20:17.119 --> 00:20:18.400
His name is Mike Ryan.
00:20:19.519 --> 00:20:23.839
How how how sure I am that algorithms are strategic in what they do?
00:20:24.480 --> 00:20:28.400
All the things we know and see is they're not strategic.
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:28.720
Yeah.
00:20:28.960 --> 00:20:32.160
And of course, then you could say yes, that's the reason why you have to prompt it.
00:20:32.319 --> 00:20:42.079
But yes, the prompt itself only makes sense if I have some control there still and at reference points I can I can look at if something goes wrong.
00:20:42.400 --> 00:20:44.160
So um I don't know.
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:47.440
I'm I'm not just I'm I'm just not a fan at all of this vision.
00:20:47.519 --> 00:20:49.039
Um, so I'll start that one.
00:20:49.279 --> 00:20:51.359
If you listen to us, I think it's not a good idea.
00:20:51.440 --> 00:20:54.240
By the way, it it won't land with with the market.
00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:56.319
No, I mean, at least not yet.
00:20:56.720 --> 00:20:59.920
He talks about it as their final frontier or something like that.
00:21:00.400 --> 00:21:03.359
But um, so we'll find out.
00:21:03.599 --> 00:21:07.119
We'll see how long it takes and that people are ready for these ideas.
00:21:07.359 --> 00:21:07.839
But yeah.
00:21:08.079 --> 00:21:08.640
Let's see.
00:21:09.200 --> 00:21:10.799
Mike, anything else?
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:15.680
Or I'm just I'm just kind of reaching around in my brain looking for something neg negative to happen.
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:16.559
Okay, yes, of course.
00:21:16.720 --> 00:21:17.920
Negative or low low point.
00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:18.559
Yeah.
00:21:18.799 --> 00:21:20.880
Low point still is there.
00:21:20.960 --> 00:21:22.240
I mean, Mark would kick.
00:21:22.319 --> 00:21:27.279
By the way, I think even if we fought him at the same time, I think he would still kick our ass.
00:21:27.440 --> 00:21:30.160
Oh, it's a lower low low point than the last time.
00:21:30.319 --> 00:21:30.799
Yeah, yeah.
00:21:30.960 --> 00:21:31.759
Well, hold on, Chris.
00:21:31.920 --> 00:21:34.319
I think we would need a a third guy at least.
00:21:34.480 --> 00:21:38.319
I I have to tell you, I get maybe our producer jumps in here.
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:39.279
Yeah.
00:21:39.599 --> 00:21:48.960
I get so many um emails every week, every day for people, or it's usually AI, I don't know, but people trying to place guests on this podcast.
00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:54.400
Um, which is funny because we actually haven't had a guest on this podcast in a long time.
00:21:54.720 --> 00:21:55.759
That's in my mark sucker.
00:21:56.240 --> 00:21:57.920
So why they even pitch in the first place?
00:21:58.079 --> 00:21:58.480
Yeah.
00:21:58.720 --> 00:22:01.839
And uh yeah, I I loved it.
00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:06.000
It was like, um, your your podcast is so empowering.
00:22:06.240 --> 00:22:09.039
And it's like, no, it's not, it's depressing.
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:11.839
I know you never listen to the podcast.
00:22:11.920 --> 00:22:12.799
You called it empowering.
00:22:13.039 --> 00:22:15.759
No one who listened to podcasts would ever call it empowering.
00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:24.000
If they had said your podcast is so depressing and always ends on a down note, I'd be like oh my god, they actually want they actually listen.
00:22:24.319 --> 00:22:25.279
Yes, yes.
00:22:25.839 --> 00:22:27.279
But look, everything will be okay.
00:22:27.519 --> 00:22:28.880
Anyway, everything's gonna be fine.
00:22:29.039 --> 00:22:31.279
Yes, everything's gonna be fine I'm an optimist, actually.
00:22:31.519 --> 00:22:34.000
But I'm I'm optimistic prime.
00:22:34.319 --> 00:22:34.880
I love that.
00:22:35.440 --> 00:22:36.079
There we go.
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:37.680
Thanks for the dad jokes.
00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:38.799
We can tell your dad.
00:22:39.039 --> 00:22:40.000
And not a low point.
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:42.000
Yeah, definitely a low point.
00:22:42.160 --> 00:22:42.559
All right.
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:47.759
This has been another episode of Growing E-Commerce brought to you as always by Smarter Ecommerce.
00:22:47.920 --> 00:22:50.799
You can learn more at smarter-ecommerce.com.
00:22:50.960 --> 00:22:54.480
And as always, we really appreciate those YouTube comments and likes.
00:22:54.559 --> 00:22:58.319
Um, the numbers have been September was an insane month.
00:22:58.480 --> 00:22:58.880
Thanks for that.
00:22:58.960 --> 00:22:59.119
Yes.
00:22:59.279 --> 00:23:02.160
But I I hope that uh at the end of October we'll say the same.
00:23:02.240 --> 00:23:03.440
It was our biggest month ever.
00:23:03.519 --> 00:23:06.000
So that's thanks to support from people like you.
00:23:06.559 --> 00:23:07.359
Thanks so much.
00:23:07.599 --> 00:23:08.240
Bye.