TRANSKRIPTIO 🔗
1
00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:05,909
[Auto-generated transcript. Edits may have been applied for clarity.]
Welcome to the Year of Curiosity podcast from Carleton College,
2
00:00:05,910 --> 00:00:13,320
where we take a year long dive into a complex topic and invite curious guests to share their experiences and their questions.
3
00:00:13,530 --> 00:00:18,840
This year, we're diving into the world of artificial intelligence. How will I change the ways we learn, work, and live?
4
00:00:18,870 --> 00:00:22,380
What will we gain and lose as this technology becomes more pervasive and accessible?
5
00:00:22,500 --> 00:00:28,170
Join us as we pursue these questions and many others with an open mind and a curious attitude.
6
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:31,350
I'm George Cusack, the director of Writing Across the Curriculum at Carleton.
7
00:00:31,470 --> 00:00:36,390
And I'm Jennifer Wolfe, a biologist and the director of Carleton's Perlman Center for Learning and Teaching.
8
00:00:40,310 --> 00:00:47,420
Welcome. Our AI generated tagline for the week is intelligently interrogating AI inquiries.
9
00:00:48,230 --> 00:00:51,710
George, thank you for picking that particular tagline. You're quite welcome.
10
00:00:51,740 --> 00:00:55,490
How are you doing? I'm all right. How are you today? I'm good.
11
00:00:56,180 --> 00:01:02,420
What's made you curious lately? Well, as you know, I have a 16 year old who's just started looking at colleges.
12
00:01:02,450 --> 00:01:10,250
Uh, and they've already come across one school who has a, uh, an aggressive chat bot on its website.
13
00:01:10,310 --> 00:01:16,490
Uh, once it pegs you as a prospective student. Uh, and so this got me thinking about just how.
14
00:01:17,540 --> 00:01:24,559
This gives colleges a personality, and it kind of leads students to think of the college,
15
00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,190
the institution, as a friend before they even come on campus.
16
00:01:28,730 --> 00:01:35,120
And so it's got me thinking about, okay, well, there's there's things that are good about that, obviously in terms of welcoming and belonging,
17
00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:42,290
but there's also things that are potentially bad about thinking of your institution as a an entity with a personality.
18
00:01:42,830 --> 00:01:46,069
It's going to become a friend that asks you for money, if nothing else. Exactly that.
19
00:01:46,070 --> 00:01:50,060
Yes. Does Carleton have that?
20
00:01:50,330 --> 00:01:54,110
Uh, not to my knowledge yet. I don't think so either. What about you?
21
00:01:54,140 --> 00:02:02,209
What's making you curious? Well, we're recording on April 1st, April Fool's Day, and I know you are not listening to it on April Fool's Day,
22
00:02:02,210 --> 00:02:06,950
but I did think about just absolutely making something up.
23
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:15,890
Um, but then I decided against that for various reasons, um, and decided just to be curious about the origin of April Fool's Day.
24
00:02:15,920 --> 00:02:21,710
Load full transcript
Um, I'm sure that this has been the topic of many, uh, PhD theses.
25
00:02:22,190 --> 00:02:30,380
Um, and I did not consult them. I went to my friend Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica, which still exists,
26
00:02:30,920 --> 00:02:37,790
and Britannica actually says it is unknowable, which sounds mysterious and kind of cool.
27
00:02:38,390 --> 00:02:48,410
Um, but some people traced the origin to pagan festivals, others to a reference to the 32nd day of March in The Canterbury Tales.
28
00:02:48,650 --> 00:02:54,229
So I thought that was kind of cool. And we know it was firmly established by the 1500s,
29
00:02:54,230 --> 00:03:04,340
because in a 1561 poem by Flemish poet Edward Tradin about a nobleman who sends his servant on frivolous errands on the 1st of April,
30
00:03:04,970 --> 00:03:12,140
um, the servant soon realizes that he has been sent on a fool's errand because it's April 1st.
31
00:03:12,140 --> 00:03:16,070
And so there you have the origin of that little phrase, too.
32
00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:23,330
And I'm thinking that maybe my trip down this rabbit hole for half an hour's time this morning is also a fool's errand,
33
00:03:23,330 --> 00:03:28,400
but I kind of had fun with the tail end of spring break. It seems like a worthy way to spend that time.
34
00:03:28,430 --> 00:03:32,030
Well, I needed to wake up and my coffee wasn't at hand.
35
00:03:32,030 --> 00:03:36,020
So this this did it. But I want to get our guests in on this conversation.
36
00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:41,090
So today we have two guests from the Carlton Library.
37
00:03:41,330 --> 00:03:46,430
We have Sarah Calhoun, who is a reference and instruction librarian for humanities and digital scholarship,
38
00:03:46,700 --> 00:03:51,080
and Sean Lahey, a reference and instruction librarian for social sciences and data.
39
00:03:51,590 --> 00:03:57,620
So Sean and Sarah, first, thank you so much for coming to be with us at this busy time of year.
40
00:03:58,070 --> 00:04:01,400
Um, we love to hear what you're curious about. Yeah.
41
00:04:01,700 --> 00:04:08,210
Um, first to go back, um, in case you're wondering about the Encyclopedia Britannica, we do also have a subscription to it,
42
00:04:08,450 --> 00:04:12,469
which has more information than the free version that you all often come across in Google.
43
00:04:12,470 --> 00:04:17,300
So, FYI, a little while back down the rabbit hole, back down the rabbit hole for you.
44
00:04:17,330 --> 00:04:20,600
Yeah. Um, so but big picture. Curious.
45
00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,909
I'm thinking about how to balance innovation.
46
00:04:22,910 --> 00:04:27,710
So in some ways are good for the few with preservation of government and environment, for the good, for the many.
47
00:04:28,070 --> 00:04:35,209
But also because it is April 1st today. Um, what is the weather report and April Fool's joke?
48
00:04:35,210 --> 00:04:41,600
Because it is going to be a lot happening today. So yeah, I saw that we were supposed
to have snow.
49
00:04:41,630 --> 00:04:49,490
Yeah, yeah we are. And then and some rain and probably some probably something else and 80 degree temperatures or something on top of that.
50
00:04:50,190 --> 00:04:59,000
Yeah. I feel like there's always a week in late March early April where Minnesota experiences multiple seasons within a couple day period.
51
00:04:59,390 --> 00:05:02,810
Yeah, yeah. And they're not in a chronological sequence.
52
00:05:02,930 --> 00:05:11,880
No, no. Yeah. There've been many a mayday parade where I've been in snow or oppressive heat or rain.
53
00:05:11,900 --> 00:05:16,200
So we're not even two. We're not even through April yet. That's mostly belts.
54
00:05:18,110 --> 00:05:21,829
Shawn, how about you? Um, I am curious about.
55
00:05:21,830 --> 00:05:25,489
I was just reading about it, uh, yesterday in preparation for this, but that, uh,
56
00:05:25,490 --> 00:05:31,610
eye popping gift Reed Hastings gave to Bowdoin to set up an AI initiative there.
57
00:05:31,610 --> 00:05:37,729
So very curious to see. I mean, I don't know how closely you will be able to kind of track it, but, you know,
58
00:05:37,730 --> 00:05:46,430
to see a leading liberal arts college get that kind of money to kind of really invest a lot of time and energy in, uh, AI, that's kind of exciting.
59
00:05:46,430 --> 00:05:53,390
And also, I'm curious to know, I mean, we're very much in this AI moment where we don't know what the future is going to be.
60
00:05:53,810 --> 00:05:57,080
Um, how much of this is hype, how much is reality, etc.
61
00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:01,820
And so, you know, with these kind of big initiatives. Yeah. What will they look like in ten years time?
62
00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:08,920
Well, it's it's particularly interesting since Colby College, just up the road has the Davis Institute for AI.
63
00:06:08,930 --> 00:06:17,060
So that's two liberal arts schools with major, well-funded and in one case quite well established AI institutes with.
64
00:06:17,090 --> 00:06:20,270
Then what? I believe about 70 miles of each other.
65
00:06:20,300 --> 00:06:26,330
So, yeah, I mean, the AI capital, they're U.S. natural lobsters and I.
66
00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:33,589
Yeah. There we have it. So one of the things is we like to ask all our guests is about their eye origin story.
67
00:06:33,590 --> 00:06:41,600
So can you think back to a time when I first became a big deal or entered your consciousness?
68
00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:44,600
And let's shake it up and ask Sean first.
69
00:06:44,780 --> 00:06:47,689
Okay. Um, well, for me, it really is.
70
00:06:47,690 --> 00:06:55,100
You know, if we don't count the the Spielberg movie, that was a huge disappointment to me when it came out, uh, both creepy and disappointing.
71
00:06:55,130 --> 00:07:03,590
Yes. Yeah, yeah. Um, but, uh, between then and, uh, I would say November 2022, when ChatGPT, uh, was released and,
72
00:07:03,590 --> 00:07:09,110
you know, generative AI or the concept of generative AI kind of took over the world.
73
00:07:09,140 --> 00:07:15,410
Um, that's I think when it really, um, kind of, uh, all started for me, like many people.
74
00:07:15,410 --> 00:07:23,299
So I also had, uh, a parental leave that lasted, uh, a few blissful months of, you know, total ignorance about all things.
75
00:07:23,300 --> 00:07:30,020
I, uh, so that when I came back from that, uh, in July of last year, it was sort of like, oh, it's still it's still here.
76
00:07:30,020 --> 00:07:37,550
It's still a thing. So how about you, Sarah? Similar to Sean in many ways, uh, though also rewinding a bit before that,
77
00:07:37,850 --> 00:07:44,629
I co supervise a group of student workers, the digital scholarship interns with some of my colleagues, and it's.
78
00:07:44,630 --> 00:07:54,710
And digital humanities, um, with them back in 2017, we started reading, um, some articles about bias in AI, like with race and gender.
79
00:07:55,160 --> 00:08:03,440
Um, I use by police specifically, um, Clearview AI, which is apparently still around, though they were starting to fold for a while.
80
00:08:03,950 --> 00:08:06,829
Um, and then also more recently have been reading about, um,
81
00:08:06,830 --> 00:08:12,350
Google's firing of their ethical AI team in December 2020, environmental cause of training AI.
82
00:08:12,350 --> 00:08:17,330
So it's been kind of there for a couple of years, is something that we revisit and discuss over time.
83
00:08:17,900 --> 00:08:21,590
Yeah, certainly a lot to think about and a lot to be concerned about. Yeah, yeah.
84
00:08:22,340 --> 00:08:32,270
So to start with a somewhat basic question, um, for for folks who don't know, what does it mean to be a research library and how do you become one?
85
00:08:32,270 --> 00:08:36,530
And I guess, in particular, what does it mean to be research librarian in 2025?
86
00:08:36,620 --> 00:08:40,729
Great question. Um, well, uh, we're figuring out the latter part of that question.
87
00:08:40,730 --> 00:08:48,980
Okay. Sure. Every day it's you, uh, you know, to become, uh, research librarian, um, or even a librarian kind of at any,
88
00:08:49,340 --> 00:08:53,809
um, higher education institution, uh, library school helps going to library school.
89
00:08:53,810 --> 00:08:57,200
So both Sarah and I have our, uh, library science degrees.
90
00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:01,429
That's a graduate degree. Um, but, uh, you know, it's interesting.
91
00:09:01,430 --> 00:09:04,669
We have interns in the library, um, every year.
92
00:09:04,670 --> 00:09:08,479
And one part of their experience is they have to go around and talk to the
93
00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:11,960
librarians in the reference and instruction department or call RNAi department,
94
00:09:12,350 --> 00:09:16,729
um, uh, to find out what our journey to becoming librarians is.
95
00:09:16,730 --> 00:09:22,700
And I think part of that is that everyone's journey tends actually to be, with the exception of that
degree, very different.
96
00:09:22,700 --> 00:09:30,290
So for a lot of folks, it can be a second or third career. In my case, I did it not that long after graduating from college.
97
00:09:30,290 --> 00:09:37,010
Um, but there's a lot of different things that I think bring people to, um, becoming librarians and research librarians in particular.
98
00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:45,470
Um, there are, you know, there are those librarians who might work at a large R1 university where they really are supporting a lot of, you know,
99
00:09:45,770 --> 00:09:52,910
in-depth research, the work of graduate students and faculty and their work is, you know, I would say primarily on the research support side.
100
00:09:53,420 --> 00:10:01,760
Then for librarians like Sara and I here at Carleton, um, you might be, uh,
101
00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:05,930
you know, you might be more interested in the, um, teaching side of things.
102
00:10:05,930 --> 00:10:08,509
You might be more interested in working with undergraduate students.
103
00:10:08,510 --> 00:10:16,130
The the appeal, in addition to supporting research, I think is also, um, on that kind of pedagogical side.
104
00:10:16,370 --> 00:10:19,519
So, um, the pedagogical side of the research process.
105
00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:25,309
So, um, I think that that's, that's certainly that's sort of what brought me to being, um, an RNA librarian.
106
00:10:25,310 --> 00:10:29,900
But, um. Sara. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, my journey was pretty similar.
107
00:10:29,900 --> 00:10:37,820
This is also about a third career for me. Um, and I also have another degree in Asian studies and then went on to get the library science.
108
00:10:37,820 --> 00:10:39,260
So that's pretty common to see.
109
00:10:39,590 --> 00:10:45,920
And of course, there are many different types of librarians, all who kind of follow the similar path of getting a library science degree.
110
00:10:46,370 --> 00:10:49,099
Um, so in addition to reference librarians like us,
111
00:10:49,100 --> 00:10:56,419
we also have librarian colleagues and archives and special collections cataloging, collection development all through the library.
112
00:10:56,420 --> 00:11:03,530
These specialized people coming in with their specialized knowledge and how to make information available to the broader campus.
113
00:11:03,710 --> 00:11:11,630
So being at Carleton, do you miss sort of the opportunity at a huge library to, you know, ride the carriage elevators down into the dark cat?
114
00:11:11,630 --> 00:11:16,610
I know I say this having yeah, having.
115
00:11:16,740 --> 00:11:19,710
I'm here from an R1, so I worked at Yale before I got here.
116
00:11:20,100 --> 00:11:26,399
Um, and again, because a lot of the the goal of a library is to make information accessible.
117
00:11:26,400 --> 00:11:35,790
And so trying to just decipher a lot of these very difficult systems, um, is not easy, shall we say.
118
00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:42,030
Um, one of the things I like about working at Carleton is that it is so, as Shawn was saying, like pedagogy and teaching focused,
119
00:11:42,270 --> 00:11:46,590
that we do get a lot more of that, like very hands on teaching work that we can do with students.
120
00:11:47,850 --> 00:11:53,549
So that actually raises something. I've always wondered about librarians, which is, um, uh, obviously your whole job,
121
00:11:53,550 --> 00:11:56,730
as you just summarized it, is to make information accessible to people.
122
00:11:58,270 --> 00:12:05,720
At the same time, is there a certain thrill in knowing stuff that, you know, 99% of the world doesn't?
123
00:12:05,740 --> 00:12:13,030
You know, sort of uncovering things that you think, okay, I'm probably the the first person to read this in 50 years or a hundred years.
124
00:12:14,510 --> 00:12:17,780
That sounds like my job as a scientist. Yeah, yeah.
125
00:12:17,810 --> 00:12:25,280
Yes and no. Um, I think one of the thrills is finding this knowledge and then being able to share it.
126
00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:26,959
So it's not the finding. Okay?
127
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:33,830
And a lot of times, the only way that it gets found is because one of my colleagues has already done the work to describe and organize it.
128
00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:35,719
So like when you go into an archive,
129
00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:42,380
the reason something is findable is that the archivists have spent a lot of time like putting everything in folders and making a finding aid for you.
130
00:12:42,500 --> 00:12:48,170
So there's a lot of that, um, kind of like gratitude toward colleagues and toward the system of doing this.
131
00:12:48,170 --> 00:12:53,090
And then one of the really fun parts for me is having these consultations with students or sometimes faculty,
132
00:12:53,090 --> 00:12:58,909
when they're working on a very kind of niche research topic of like, okay, what can we find about?
133
00:12:58,910 --> 00:13:05,629
Of course, now I'm blanking on all topics, but, you know, when we get to sit down and really dig through primary sources and find a thing of like,
134
00:13:05,630 --> 00:13:15,890
oh, here's this testimony from a court case in 1940 that has exactly what you need about a topic, so that that can be the really fun part.
135
00:13:15,890 --> 00:13:20,090
But again, it's usually only because some other librarian spent so much time with it.
136
00:13:20,300 --> 00:13:26,570
So, so the fantasy trope of librarians hoarding information, smog style doesn't hold any appeal to either of you.
137
00:13:27,170 --> 00:13:30,469
I don't know if it does for you. No no no no. I'm kind.
138
00:13:30,470 --> 00:13:36,230
I'm kind of relieved at that. I have to say, and I've mentioned this on the podcast before,
139
00:13:36,260 --> 00:13:41,809
I loved the library time when I was a child, and we had a class on how to use the library.
140
00:13:41,810 --> 00:13:49,040
We would go once a week and there, um, and it was taught by our school
librarian, whose name I kid you not was Mrs. Book.
141
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:52,520
That's amazing. And I thought that was normal.
142
00:13:52,970 --> 00:13:57,620
Um. So clearly I need to change my name.
143
00:13:57,620 --> 00:14:01,459
Right? Right. Um, and so that was great.
144
00:14:01,460 --> 00:14:12,200
And the other thing that came out of that is this woman was so obsessed with our pushing in chairs when we left the table that I now associate a,
145
00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,259
I never leave a table without pushing in the chair.
146
00:14:15,260 --> 00:14:20,450
And I get really kind of irritated when people leave chairs all willy nilly.
147
00:14:20,930 --> 00:14:28,790
And I wonder if that's also taught in library school or this was a quirk of Marlene book.
148
00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:35,749
Uh, yeah. I mean, certain sounds like she was playing to type there for the fastidious librarian.
149
00:14:35,750 --> 00:14:39,620
But, you know, I think, uh, yeah, it's sort of right.
150
00:14:39,620 --> 00:14:46,549
I will say. Yeah. The, the, the the notion of the shushing librarian is obviously something we push back against.
151
00:14:46,550 --> 00:14:49,459
And this there is a probably been pushed myself more well,
152
00:14:49,460 --> 00:14:53,450
certainly more often than I've ever shut somebody because I don't think I ever have had to go over.
153
00:14:53,450 --> 00:15:03,229
But um, but yeah. No, I think, uh, you know, it did library school, uh, you know, what did it impart in sort of those ways?
154
00:15:03,230 --> 00:15:06,379
I'm not sure I can recall. Not part of the curriculum? Absolutely.
155
00:15:06,380 --> 00:15:15,710
There's no very diplomatic answer. So, so coming back to that question of what it means to be a research librarian in 2025.
156
00:15:15,890 --> 00:15:24,230
Um, we've obviously talked a lot on this podcast about how AI is affecting reading and writing, especially the way students read and write.
157
00:15:24,620 --> 00:15:31,370
Uh, how is it affecting the way students research or the way you work with students as you teach them how to use the library for research?
158
00:15:32,210 --> 00:15:39,590
Um, yeah, I'll, I'll start. And I would say that, um, maybe even surprisingly, it hasn't had, uh,
159
00:15:39,590 --> 00:15:45,110
super significant impact yet on the way I work with students and I think across our department and ah,
160
00:15:45,110 --> 00:15:49,969
and I it hasn't had, um, may there haven't been major changes so far.
161
00:15:49,970 --> 00:15:54,290
Certainly. You know, I've had research consultations with students where we will, um,
162
00:15:54,290 --> 00:16:01,429
use an AI tool to kind of help further along their research, um, when not just when appropriate.
163
00:16:01,430 --> 00:16:05,780
But, you know, sometimes it's just some students have come and they want they want to try it out.
164
00:16:05,780 --> 00:16:12,409
It's been a not that many examples, but they they were told like, well, why don't you try Gemini to do this?
165
00:16:12,410 --> 00:16:16,940
Um, aspect of like the methodology. Um, and then for myself, I mean,
166
00:16:16,940 --> 00:16:21,290
I do incorporate it sometimes when I'm trying to get up to speed on the topic because
167
00:16:21,290 --> 00:16:26,119
students come to us with many different topics that we certainly don't have expertise in.
168
00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:33,380
So just like I might Google it or Wikipedia it, or look at an encyclopedia about a topic to get some surface level introduction.
169
00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:39,470
I'll use Gemini for that sometimes. Um, I have also used it to check my work.
170
00:16:39,500 --> 00:16:42,889
You know, if I've had a research consultation, I was like, yeah, that went pretty well.
171
00:16:42,890 --> 00:16:45,980
I wonder what you know, ChatGPT would have done. And what did I miss?
172
00:16:45,980 --> 00:16:50,360
Uh, yeah. Let's see. I haven't given myself grades yet, but that is another use for it.
173
00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:53,389
I suppose you could probably ask ChatGPT to give you a grade.
174
00:16:53,390 --> 00:16:56,840
That's true. Yeah, that's, uh. But grades are meaningless.
175
00:16:56,840 --> 00:17:05,360
That's true. That's also true. Um, but, uh, so, yeah, I haven't seen, you know, I think a significant change yet, but it is changing.
176
00:17:05,360 --> 00:17:13,760
Um, and it, um, I think one thing that's going to be more prominent in our work is the fact that obviously, we know these.
177
00:17:13,860 --> 00:17:20,339
Commercial. Uh, a lot of these commercial. Um. Tools are out there and very popular.
178
00:17:20,340 --> 00:17:23,430
But all of the databases or most of the, you know,
179
00:17:23,580 --> 00:17:28,740
research platforms that we subscribe to at the library are themselves starting to roll out research.
180
00:17:28,770 --> 00:17:31,499
I enhancements, research assistants, that sort of thing.
181
00:17:31,500 --> 00:17:38,159
So, um, it is becoming ubiquitous, not just because it's in the news or it's, you know, we get ads about it every day,
182
00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:44,190
but because everywhere we'll turn within the library, we'll probably have an AI component to it in the future.
183
00:17:44,190 --> 00:17:51,629
So, um, you know, and that's not that I think the way, you know,
184
00:17:51,630 --> 00:17:57,750
I know Sarah and I have been talking about that is that this is not this just a sort of the same as it always has been,
185
00:17:57,750 --> 00:18:03,360
where we have access to hundreds of databases worldwide because they each have different capabilities,
186
00:18:03,360 --> 00:18:06,839
functionalities, affordances, uh, as well as limitations.
187
00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:10,770
And so you can find the same journal across 7 or 8 different databases.
188
00:18:10,770 --> 00:18:14,489
But why would you use ProQuest instead of Web of Science and that sort of thing.
189
00:18:14,490 --> 00:18:23,819
And so I
think we'll still see our job to be helping students navigate, um, those different, those differences in AI.
190
00:18:23,820 --> 00:18:27,000
Um, because as we know, AI doesn't mean one thing.
191
00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:30,620
It means many things. Um, so I can see that being part of the work we do.
192
00:18:30,630 --> 00:18:37,709
You mentioned that a major part of your job is obviously making it easier for people to find information and find resources.
193
00:18:37,710 --> 00:18:42,450
Um, that's what I promise to do is make the whole process of research easier.
194
00:18:42,870 --> 00:18:50,249
Do you have a kind of, uh, line or mental rule of thumb for when it becomes too easy,
195
00:18:50,250 --> 00:18:56,070
when you know what parts of research should require a certain amount of effort for the payoff for it.
196
00:18:56,280 --> 00:18:57,929
Oh, that's. Yeah, that's a great question.
197
00:18:57,930 --> 00:19:04,259
I mean, I think the way I kind of think about it is, yes, I do think that like, friction is a good part of the research process,
198
00:19:04,260 --> 00:19:09,959
that there's not just learning there, but also opportunity for unexpected results and serendipity.
199
00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:17,940
All that and that I would say is a, you know, um, there's lots of reasons why I worry about or don't like.
200
00:19:18,420 --> 00:19:28,469
I, um, let's say, but one thing is specific to, let's say, the Carleton context or the undergraduate context is that notion that, oh, okay.
201
00:19:28,470 --> 00:19:36,720
Well, it produces a really convincing answer. And so, um, you know, I can work from here and, and kind of building off.
202
00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:44,760
Right, taking what the I said as maybe it's mostly true, but the kind of like the certainty maybe that comes from looking at a nice,
203
00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:50,069
clean literature review that, uh, an AI has produced versus the yeah,
204
00:19:50,070 --> 00:19:58,410
the effort, the frustration, the unexpected finds, um, unexpected connections, uh, that, um,
205
00:19:58,650 --> 00:20:04,590
I think are essential to learning how to do research and as well as, you know, the kind of joy of research.
206
00:20:04,590 --> 00:20:14,550
So that's that's what I worry about, I suppose, or that there would be my kind of point at which I'd really want to drive home to students.
207
00:20:15,390 --> 00:20:25,230
Okay. It's one tool among many like keep, keep looking, think about it as, um, either a starting point or something to bounce your ideas off of.
208
00:20:26,430 --> 00:20:34,710
Um, a concrete example of this. So I've been doing some genealogy work, uh, just kind of on my own time for fun, as librarians do.
209
00:20:35,190 --> 00:20:38,249
Um, and I've been reading through a lot of shipping news from Maine.
210
00:20:38,250 --> 00:20:41,670
This is from like late mid to late 1800s mainly.
211
00:20:41,670 --> 00:20:47,580
I mean, I capitol of the U.S. it all comes back to
me have it.
212
00:20:47,610 --> 00:20:54,360
Yeah. Um, so as part of this, I've been having to learn how to read shipping news from the late 1800s,
213
00:20:54,360 --> 00:20:58,800
which kind of has its own very idiosyncratic vocabulary and structure.
214
00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:01,739
Um, so I've been going through it as I've been doing that.
215
00:21:01,740 --> 00:21:06,629
Every now and then I'll come across a little phrase or an abbreviation that I cannot figure out what it means.
216
00:21:06,630 --> 00:21:10,410
And so I've been using Google Gemini to be like, okay, I'm reading shipping news. What does this mean?
217
00:21:10,830 --> 00:21:14,850
And that's been very helpful. So I've learned that D.O. is an abbreviation for ditto.
218
00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:18,570
Um, which okay, wasn't that makes total sense.
219
00:21:18,630 --> 00:21:21,750
Yeah, exactly. But it again, not an obvious one.
220
00:21:21,750 --> 00:21:24,870
So that's been very helpful going through reading more and more.
221
00:21:24,870 --> 00:21:27,989
And then I came to one specific entry that didn't make any sense.
222
00:21:27,990 --> 00:21:33,330
I was trying to put it in chronological order in a timeline for this one ship captain that I was researching.
223
00:21:33,780 --> 00:21:40,259
Um, and it wasn't working. Wasn't working. I asked Gemini, like, is it possible that this means this?
224
00:21:40,260 --> 00:21:45,180
And he was sailing from point A to point B? Gemini responded, no, absolutely not.
225
00:21:45,180 --> 00:21:49,410
It means that he was at point C, and I was like, uh, I don't know if that's true.
226
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:53,850
I ended up finding a second entry for the same trip that he was taking.
227
00:21:53,850 --> 00:22:01,530
That corroborated my gut feeling as I went back to Gemini, and I was like, oh no, actually, it does mean what I thought it does in Gemini.
228
00:22:01,530 --> 00:22:04,620
I was like, no, you're wrong. That's really that's not what it means.
229
00:22:04,620 --> 00:22:10,979
Yeah. So then it started gaslighting me. Um, and I was like, no, no, really, this isn't what it means.
230
00:22:10,980 --> 00:22:15,300
So we, I had this little back and forth, and then eventually we just had to agree to disagree.
231
00:22:15,690 --> 00:22:19,049
Um, and this is also happened. I think in the archives.
232
00:22:19,050 --> 00:22:22,290
Our archivist, um, has mentioned that this happened to.
233
00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:27,299
That he was searching for something, found the correct answer, and had been working with Gemini.
234
00:22:27,300 --> 00:22:34,110
Gemini. I was like, nope, you're wrong. So it does. Every now and then it will get hung up on an answer and will start gaslighting the humans.
235
00:22:34,500 --> 00:22:39,090
Um, so it's one of those things, I think, uh, what Sean was talking about that like you,
236
00:22:39,090 --> 00:22:46,110
you want to come in with a certain amount of curiosity and sometimes, um, doing a
second read.
237
00:22:46,110 --> 00:22:55,889
Having that friction can be helpful to kind of drive your own mind to, because Gemini will not always be responsive as a discussion partner.
238
00:22:55,890 --> 00:22:59,820
Um, and will sometimes send you down rabbit holes that you shouldn't go down.
239
00:23:00,150 --> 00:23:05,160
Well, Gemini is a more mainstream tool, and that's one that we encourage our students to use a lot.
240
00:23:05,520 --> 00:23:09,389
And so this helping them think about what's coming back, I know is really important.
241
00:23:09,390 --> 00:23:12,930
Yeah. Can you talk a little more about how students are using, um,
242
00:23:12,930 --> 00:23:22,350
tools like Gemini and ChatGPT and what other kinds of problems they might run into or what, um, benefits it has for their work, too.
243
00:23:22,410 --> 00:23:26,069
Yeah. I mean, in some ways, as Sean was saying, we haven't seen a ton of this.
244
00:23:26,070 --> 00:23:32,129
And some of that has to do with the assignments of faculty are asking students
245
00:23:32,130 --> 00:23:36,930
to do and also having to do with guidelines and policies that are in classes.
246
00:23:37,410 --> 00:23:42,389
Um, and so in some ways, as Sean was saying, it's a little more incidental.
247
00:23:42,390 --> 00:23:47,100
The first, there have been a couple of classes that are starting to explore.
248
00:23:47,550 --> 00:23:53,940
The first big one that I'm going to be working with is, um, history 298, which is the History Methods class this spring.
249
00:23:54,270 --> 00:24:00,989
So I'm going to be working with them. And you know, we haven't fully fledged the assignment and um, the exercise yet,
250
00:24:00,990 --> 00:24:06,360
but what I'm hoping to do is work with the students to have them both do essentially some slow research.
251
00:24:06,360 --> 00:24:15,120
So like the human driven research first to see how that goes, and then ask Gemini to essentially like help as that assistant.
252
00:24:15,120 --> 00:24:23,219
So how can use this as a research assistant. Can Gemini help you write a query, a search query, boolean search query to use in catalyst?
253
00:24:23,220 --> 00:24:26,970
Ah catalog can recommend some journals to go look in.
254
00:24:26,970 --> 00:24:36,300
What are the major journals? Um, because like one of the very big known pitfalls, it's been around for over a year, years now.
255
00:24:36,630 --> 00:24:43,920
Um, is that a lot of times because, um, generative AI is looking to make the humans happy,
256
00:24:43,920 --> 00:24:48,149
unless it's arguing with you, unless it's arguing with you, in which case it's like, no, no, you are right.
257
00:24:48,150 --> 00:24:51,570
If it's a librarian, yeah, I know better.
258
00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:56,339
Yeah. Um, but yeah, it's making making the human happy.
259
00:24:56,340 --> 00:25:00,059
Yeah. Um, it's trying to figure out, like, what is index area?
260
00:25:00,060 --> 00:25:05,490
What is the most likely author, what is the most likely title. But it's not necessarily which of those go together.
261
00:25:05,490 --> 00:25:16,170
And so a lot of times it will take and recombine these pieces of information to create new citations for books or articles that perhaps don't exist.
262
00:25:16,410 --> 00:25:20,070
So this is something that will periodically come up and cross our desks.
263
00:25:20,490 --> 00:25:26,940
Um, I feel like that pitfall is becoming more widely known.
264
00:25:27,390 --> 00:25:31,140
Um, but it's still something that, you know, it's good to remind people about.
265
00:25:31,350 --> 00:25:36,819
Um. Yeah. I'm thinking about a good, uh, misattribution of an author.
266
00:25:36,820 --> 00:25:40,690
You know, like, I don't know, Harry Potter by Stephen King. Yeah, yeah.
267
00:25:40,720 --> 00:25:44,530
Would be a good example. Yeah. Not not hard hitting research, right?
268
00:25:44,560 --> 00:25:51,610
Yeah, but they're very both of them are very popular and very common, you know, title slash authors.
269
00:25:51,610 --> 00:25:53,920
So of course I must go together. It seems like one thing.
270
00:25:54,100 --> 00:25:58,509
So I know you mentioned that scholarly publishing and the kind of research that faculty do is
271
00:25:58,510 --> 00:26:03,399
less a component of your job here at Carleton than it might be at an hour one but obviously,
272
00:26:03,400 --> 00:26:06,610
keeping track of scholarly publishing is still part of your job.
273
00:26:07,030 --> 00:26:16,150
Um, how do you see I affecting scholarly publishing as an industry, or the kinds of research the faculty are doing?
274
00:26:17,380 --> 00:26:22,600
Um, there are definitely a lot of publishers that are actively looking for guidance on that right now.
275
00:26:22,600 --> 00:26:31,240
Um, in part because there's the the question around, can scholarship be used to train AI models?
276
00:26:31,630 --> 00:26:36,730
Um, and I'm also in the copyright Committee, and this is an outstanding question.
277
00:26:36,730 --> 00:26:42,129
And by outstanding I mean both good and outstanding is still under discussion.
278
00:26:42,130 --> 00:26:47,050
Yeah. Um, and there are a bunch of court cases that are making their way through the system now.
279
00:26:47,050 --> 00:26:55,840
Uh, the first one has gone through that said, like, no, you cannot use this license material to train, but it's only one of many.
280
00:26:55,840 --> 00:27:03,070
And there are a lot of trackers of court cases out there. Um, there are some groups that are starting to set some standards.
281
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:09,160
Um, there's the Committee on Publication Ethics, or Cope, which has authorship and AI tools.
282
00:27:09,670 --> 00:27:16,930
Um, there are some licensing models out there so that are working along the same lines as Creative Commons.
283
00:27:16,930 --> 00:27:24,670
So like authors can choose to license their content for training, but maybe not in other ways.
284
00:27:25,150
--> 00:27:30,309
Um, but again, these are small early efforts down that road.
285
00:27:30,310 --> 00:27:37,180
So it's something I think, to keep an eye on. Um, and probably for any faculty or anyone who's actively publishing right now,
286
00:27:37,180 --> 00:27:43,060
you'd probably want to have that conversation with your publisher about how do and don't you want your material to be used?
287
00:27:44,300 --> 00:27:50,630
Um, uh, you know, I'm also curious about, you know, the and some people have been talking about this,
288
00:27:50,810 --> 00:27:54,260
the sort of big picture impact it will have, right?
289
00:27:54,260 --> 00:27:58,280
In terms of output, the sheer amount of output it's being.
290
00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:03,550
You know, I is a solution to the peer review problem in there.
291
00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:09,680
No you can't find peer reviewers. But um, at the same time it's going to help, you know, create, uh,
292
00:28:09,680 --> 00:28:14,540
maybe even make worse the problem of the, you know, profusion of, uh, publications that are out there.
293
00:28:14,540 --> 00:28:20,420
And so, you know, there are a lot of problems with scholarly publishing, lots and lots of problems with scholarly publishing.
294
00:28:20,720 --> 00:28:26,630
Um, and is I going to provide any sort of solutions to this or exacerbate these problems?
295
00:28:27,020 --> 00:28:33,889
Um, in addition to is it going to help create actually progress, knowledge and understanding?
296
00:28:33,890 --> 00:28:39,770
And I think some people are very skeptical about that, that more publications doesn't mean more progress.
297
00:28:39,770 --> 00:28:43,879
I mean, um, so, you know, how that's going to shake out, you know,
298
00:28:43,880 --> 00:28:47,780
we won't know necessarily for years, but that's certainly a conversation that I think is very,
299
00:28:48,140 --> 00:28:57,770
uh, worth having, you know, um, amongst ourselves, um, within the Carlton context, but also within our disciplines and that sort of thing.
300
00:28:58,250 --> 00:29:02,239
Yeah. Well, there's certainly a lot of uncertainty and many questions,
301
00:29:02,240 --> 00:29:06,379
and it feels like the haystack is getting bigger and bigger and bigger while we're looking for the needle.
302
00:29:06,380 --> 00:29:18,530
And we're glad you're here to support us in that. Um, so I want to know, um, as you look into the future, are there ways that you think I,
303
00:29:18,530 --> 00:29:24,410
um, may affect your work that you're excited about or afraid of?
304
00:29:26,450 --> 00:29:30,170
It's on. And I look nervously at each other. Okay.
305
00:29:30,680 --> 00:29:33,750
Do you want to go for. This is not binding. Yeah, yeah.
306
00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:37,790
Okay. Um. Well, excited? I'm not so sure.
307
00:29:37,790 --> 00:29:40,130
You know, I think that there are there are.
308
00:29:40,790 --> 00:29:49,190
I think for me, a lot of the things that are exciting about it are overshadowed by,
um, some of the problems, I think that it might introduce,
309
00:29:49,220 --> 00:29:55,490
um, like I said, whether it's helping with peer review, but then also making things worse by the profusion of, uh, publication.
310
00:29:55,880 --> 00:30:01,250
But I think for librarians, you know, you know, what's on my mind, uh, you know,
311
00:30:01,250 --> 00:30:06,530
are some of the kind of direct and indirect threats to our work, to the work we do to our labor.
312
00:30:06,740 --> 00:30:13,639
Um, automation has always been a part and not always, but automation is certainly part of librarianship.
313
00:30:13,640 --> 00:30:18,290
And libraries have explored automation in all its forms, um, over time.
314
00:30:18,290 --> 00:30:24,949
But, you know, I think that there are some significant threats to different parts of the library workflow, things like cataloging and indexing,
315
00:30:24,950 --> 00:30:29,599
which is the work of creating descriptive information about descriptive metadata,
316
00:30:29,600 --> 00:30:37,490
about books and articles and sound recordings and primary sources so that these things can be found in catalogs or on databases.
317
00:30:37,850 --> 00:30:43,190
That's work. Um, of creating those, you know, we'll call them tags, creating those tags and assigning those tags.
318
00:30:43,520 --> 00:30:47,900
Um, that's work that's traditionally been done by people, and then that work gets shared.
319
00:30:48,290 --> 00:30:55,070
Um, uh, but now you see groups, um, moving to automates that process through AI.
320
00:30:55,100 --> 00:31:00,589
So, um, you know, the example I can point to is the is mesh, the medical subject headings,
321
00:31:00,590 --> 00:31:09,260
which is an important sort of classification system that, um, had been done by manual indexers up until a couple of years ago.
322
00:31:09,260 --> 00:31:13,940
And professional library professional experience. Um, I knew an indexer once.
323
00:31:14,510 --> 00:31:20,989
Um, and so they are moving that a lot of that work to um or offloading that to artificial intelligence,
324
00:31:20,990 --> 00:31:24,379
which then, you know, I'm sure is being reviewed by indexers.
325
00:31:24,380 --> 00:31:32,270
But again, you know, um, in time, cataloging and indexing might be something that's impacted, um, for our own work.
326
00:31:32,690 --> 00:31:38,059
You know, I think we see over time, libraries across the country, no matter the size,
327
00:31:38,060 --> 00:31:44,480
you're seeing fewer and fewer students coming to the reference desk, fewer and fewer students maybe making research consultations.
328
00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:51,470
And I can only imagine this might exacerbate that problem. So, you know, how do we push back against that or show our value?
329
00:31:51,890 --> 00:31:58,400
Air quotes. I'm making sure our value, um, uh, and, uh, figure out ways to kind of, um, yeah,
330
00:31:58,400 --> 00:32:04,580
counteract, um, the perception that I might be a better
tool than talking to a librarian.
331
00:32:04,910 --> 00:32:09,260
Um, you know, will it be justification for cost cutting and right sizing?
332
00:32:09,260 --> 00:32:14,390
That's something I worry about. Um, you know, when you have large.
333
00:32:14,570 --> 00:32:19,850
I think it was Cal State large have investing heavily in these large AI partnerships,
334
00:32:20,390 --> 00:32:24,860
um, which would include access to, you know, these powerful reasoning models,
335
00:32:24,860 --> 00:32:28,909
which if you use one, you it and I've, you know, when I've tried them out, I'm like,
336
00:32:28,910 --> 00:32:32,390
oh, that sounds suspiciously like what I do when I'm talking to a student.
337
00:32:32,810 --> 00:32:34,670
So and it's mimicking a librarian, you know,
338
00:32:34,670 --> 00:32:40,819
librarians might all of a sudden human librarians might all of a sudden seem, um, look expensive and redundant.
339
00:32:40,820 --> 00:32:45,580
So these are the things. And human librarians aren't usually available at 3 a.m.
340
00:32:45,730 --> 00:32:49,960
That's also true. That's also true, though. Sort of sort of weird.
341
00:32:50,380 --> 00:32:56,410
So if you've noticed on the library websites, we do actually have a chat widget there which is staffed by human beings.
342
00:32:56,410 --> 00:33:00,010
So that is not an AI chat. Um, but it's through a consortium.
343
00:33:00,010 --> 00:33:06,219
And so they are available at 3 a.m. because they have a professional staff and there are people who are working in different time zones.
344
00:33:06,220 --> 00:33:10,090
So sometimes you'll be chatting with someone, a professional librarian in the UK for instance.
345
00:33:10,690 --> 00:33:14,590
But that means and we also staff that periodically for a couple hours a week.
346
00:33:14,980 --> 00:33:23,500
Um, and it's becoming more common that we get chat questions coming in from smaller colleges that don't have a staff.
347
00:33:24,310 --> 00:33:30,730
Um, and so a lot of times then they will essentially we their reference work is being outsourced to us.
348
00:33:31,810 --> 00:33:35,110
It is interesting and I like there's no solution to that.
349
00:33:35,110 --> 00:33:41,620
And you know, there hasn't been a large conversation, but it is something I've been noticing over the years that that's been increasing.
350
00:33:42,550 --> 00:33:48,970
Um. Oh, right. But, uh, other things I'm looking forward to, um, the, um,
351
00:33:48,970 --> 00:33:55,900
again on the Copyright Committee and I'm going to pull back the curtain a little bit here with Dan, who's in the room with us right now.
352
00:33:55,900 --> 00:34:03,220
The two of us, plus many other brilliant people across campus, are keeping track of a lot of these court cases that are going through right now.
353
00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:12,009
Um, and so, just like trying to keep up on all of the AI related cases, um, we're going to be hiring an intern for this coming year again,
354
00:34:12,010 --> 00:34:19,150
another digital scholarship intern to help us kind of track a lot of the work that's happening in various different ways.
355
00:34:19,630 --> 00:34:21,250
Um, and then also just kind of, you know,
356
00:34:21,250 --> 00:34:29,530
the small questions of what is reality and what is truth and how how do I teach truth to a student when they're, you know, like, is this real?
357
00:34:29,530 --> 00:34:34,300
Is it not real? So these these kind of questions keep me awake at night sometimes.
358
00:34:36,070 --> 00:34:45,639
Well, as we get kind of towards wrapping up, we always like to ask if there was something that you would want to or not want to offload to.
359
00:34:45,640 --> 00:34:50,500
And I if I could do anything you wanted, what would it be?
360
00:34:51,010 --> 00:34:54,550
We're in tax season right now. I would love to offload my taxes.
361
00:34:55,090 --> 00:35:00,010
Um, that's that's like it's going to be possible pretty soon does whether it's going to be reliable.
362
00:35:00,100 --> 00:35:04,270
I know right. How do I need to. There need to be for you to trust.
363
00:35:04,270 --> 00:35:10,959
I have to pay this much. You're going. Yeah. Yeah. And also because we may or may not be getting some weird weather again.
364
00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:15,370
And I live in Minneapolis, where there is always a question of who shovels the sidewalks.
365
00:35:15,700 --> 00:35:22,180
If I could shovel the sidewalks, I would be a happy, happy camper.
366
00:35:22,270 --> 00:35:27,640
How about you, Shawn? Um, I think, uh, meal planning would be my number one thing.
367
00:35:27,670 --> 00:35:30,969
You know, maybe if it had. You know, I is all seeing.
368
00:35:30,970 --> 00:35:37,750
I knew what was in all of my cupboards and in my pantry, and it could just tell me what I can make that night.
369
00:35:37,810 --> 00:35:40,390
Uh, would be very helpful. Or what I need to go get.
370
00:35:40,510 --> 00:35:49,120
Um, I still like going to the grocery store, but I don't like having to think about what to cook, uh, each night so that I would offload happily.
371
00:35:49,150 --> 00:35:53,680
Theoretically, those tools exist already. You just need to buy an internet accessible fridge.
372
00:35:53,710 --> 00:35:56,710
That's true. That's a good point. Yeah. Yeah.
373
00:35:56,710 --> 00:36:02,800
So, um, maybe maybe I'll rethink that and just throw all my money at a smart grid.
374
00:36:03,730 --> 00:36:08,080
Get a smart fridge, tell how long something's been in your fridge and whether it's been rotten.
375
00:36:08,110 --> 00:36:11,830
That's a good question. Do not throw away your carrots.
376
00:36:12,610 --> 00:36:18,730
It's no, never throw away. Yes, I never. But I think it's time for recommendations.
377
00:36:18,760 --> 00:36:20,770
George, do you want to kick us off? Sure.
378
00:36:20,770 --> 00:36:27,340
Uh, this is a bit of a long one, but I am going to recommend that folks experiment with, uh, Gemini's
deep research function.
379
00:36:27,520 --> 00:36:31,150
Uh, and this is, well, in keeping with our conversation today.
380
00:36:31,510 --> 00:36:39,159
Uh, for those of you who haven't heard of this, uh, it's a function on Gemini, though ChatGPT has its own version as well, I believe.
381
00:36:39,160 --> 00:36:40,480
Also called deep research.
382
00:36:40,990 --> 00:36:47,890
Um, but you can ask the the chat bot a research question, like, say, for instance, what are the origins of April Fool's Day?
383
00:36:48,400 --> 00:36:53,140
Uh, and then it will it will come up with a seven part research plan,
384
00:36:53,530 --> 00:36:58,900
which are essentially seven sub questions it sees under that it'll ask you to approve it.
385
00:36:59,290 --> 00:37:05,890
And then if you approve it, then in about five minutes it'll, uh, it'll go through whatever sources it has access to.
386
00:37:06,280 --> 00:37:12,610
Uh, using clearly guidelines on what constitutes a good and a not good source on the web.
387
00:37:12,940 --> 00:37:22,870
Uh, and it'll produce for you a remarkably not a good research report, but a remarkably collegiate sounding research report.
388
00:37:23,440 --> 00:37:26,530
Uh, and so, uh, complete with verifiable links.
389
00:37:26,560 --> 00:37:33,370
Uh, so it does not say it never hallucinates, but it it they no longer invent sources out of whole cloth.
390
00:37:33,940 --> 00:37:40,960
Um, so what I find interesting about this is, uh, on the one hand, it's terrible.
391
00:37:41,470 --> 00:37:52,080
Uh. And it's terrible, specifically in all the ways that the worst stereotype of an unengaged student assumes college research is supposed to work.
392
00:37:52,660 --> 00:37:59,550
Uh, so, I mean, it does the very smart and good practice of breaking your research question down into sub questions,
393
00:37:59,850 --> 00:38:06,180
but then it just maniacally goes through those seven questions, regardless of what it finds at any point.
394
00:38:06,690 --> 00:38:17,880
Uh, and then it shows them up and tries to create an overall collegiate sounding argument, uh, for what it found, no matter what it found.
395
00:38:18,360 --> 00:38:21,920
Uh, so I'll give you an example. Uh, I did run that.
396
00:38:21,930 --> 00:38:28,079
What is the origin of April Fool's Day report? Uh, to which Gemini, as part of its report.
397
00:38:28,080 --> 00:38:32,489
And and I've made the whole report accessible on Google, so we'll put it in the show notes.
398
00:38:32,490 --> 00:38:37,370
But. The enduring popularity and longevity of April Fool's Day,
399
00:38:37,370 --> 00:38:43,070
juxtaposed with the absence of a definitive origin story, underscore the intriguing nature of folklore.
400
00:38:43,490 --> 00:38:48,920
Traditions often persist and evolve within a culture, even when their precise historical genesis is unclear.
401
00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:55,430
The human inclination towards light hearted mischief and the fostering of social bonds through shared experience might serve
402
00:38:55,430 --> 00:39:01,370
as more potent drivers for the continuation of such customs than a meticulously documented historical starting point,
403
00:39:01,850 --> 00:39:06,380
so that that is such a perfect stereotype of terrible student writing.
404
00:39:06,800 --> 00:39:10,879
It's, you know, it takes a one semi clever observation.
405
00:39:10,880 --> 00:39:16,910
Isn't it funny that we don't know the origin of April Fool's Day and tries to build a profound argument around it by
406
00:39:16,910 --> 00:39:24,080
using incredibly overinflated and convoluted language to hide the fact that there's just nothing there that it did.
407
00:39:24,530 --> 00:39:29,299
You know what? For a human would be hours of research, uh, on exactly the same sources you found.
408
00:39:29,300 --> 00:39:34,630
It went to Britannica, the free version. It went to Wikipedia, and it found nothing.
409
00:39:34,640 --> 00:39:38,970
There's no answer to that question. And so it made up this slop.
410
00:39:39,350 --> 00:39:45,440
Uh, on the other hand, what I find interesting about this, other than just the schadenfreude of watching I fail at something,
411
00:39:45,830 --> 00:39:53,660
uh, is that you can actually see how the technology could produce something really quite,
412
00:39:54,110 --> 00:40:00,259
almost alarmingly good if it had better programing on what a research report actually is meant to sound like,
413
00:40:00,260 --> 00:40:07,249
if it if it was better programed and how you actually, you know, periodically come up for air and ask the human, okay, this is what I found.
414
00:40:07,250 --> 00:40:11,180
Is this good or should I go in a different direction? And if it had access to better sources?
415
00:40:11,180 --> 00:40:13,970
Right now it is literally searching via Google.
416
00:40:14,840 --> 00:40:24,170
Uh, but you can already imagine how if it had access to scholarly databases and better material, it might produce better results.
417
00:40:24,620 --> 00:40:29,720
So that's my recommendation for this week. Excellent. Well, I'm going to stick with the April Fool's Day theme here.
418
00:40:30,050 --> 00:40:35,930
And I'm just going to recommend that people have fun going back and looking at classic April Fool's Day hoaxes,
419
00:40:35,930 --> 00:40:42,150
you know, the spaghetti trees and things like that. And so I'm going to take us in the Carleton Wayback Machine.
420
00:40:42,170 --> 00:40:50,809
I don't know how long all of you have been here, but I was here in 2010 when then-President Rob Odin announced that a brand new
421
00:40:50,810 --> 00:40:54,860
administrative building would be immediately constructed on the bald spot.
422
00:40:55,130 --> 00:41:03,560
And there had been surveying the week before. And then there was construction barriers and an excavator on the, um, bald spot.
423
00:41:03,920 --> 00:41:10,640
And he released a video talking about the critical and present need for more
administrators at Carleton.
424
00:41:10,940 --> 00:41:20,299
And they even got the architects to design Cassat Hall, which is one of the dorms, to make this really over the top architectural diagram.
425
00:41:20,300 --> 00:41:24,370
And this building is yellow and black and class.
426
00:41:24,590 --> 00:41:30,080
And it is something um, we will link to the announcement and the video.
427
00:41:30,380 --> 00:41:35,840
They of course did this all without AI, so it was much more work back in those days.
428
00:41:35,840 --> 00:41:44,660
Um, but it was and and of course, it's fun to look at those things, and it's really fun to see in the comments the people who fall for the hoax.
429
00:41:44,840 --> 00:41:49,970
Um, just how could you do this? The bald spot is a Carlton treasure.
430
00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:54,530
Um, but I always have fun with that. How about you, Sarah?
431
00:41:54,830 --> 00:42:00,950
Uh, sticking with hoaxes, I have a second answer. But the first answer there was, uh oh, a couple years ago.
432
00:42:00,950 --> 00:42:06,409
Maybe it was 2020, 2021. The college released its new logo, the frisbee.
433
00:42:06,410 --> 00:42:10,040
The Frisbee one, which I mean, talk about people freaking out.
434
00:42:10,040 --> 00:42:14,989
I'm an alumni and like a few groups of alumni were just like, what is this?
435
00:42:14,990 --> 00:42:21,049
And absolutely lost it. Um, uh, that was a that was a pretty good one that they got a lot of people.
436
00:42:21,050 --> 00:42:24,830
Well, I seem to recall it was actually President Pioli's first year, I think it was.
437
00:42:24,950 --> 00:42:28,130
Yeah. Yeah. She she came out swinging. Yeah.
438
00:42:28,640 --> 00:42:35,330
And it was amazing. Um, in terms of things to share, Shawn and I are librarians.
439
00:42:35,330 --> 00:42:38,870
And so we have, in fact, built a bibliography.
440
00:42:38,990 --> 00:42:42,950
This is amazing. I was looking at this. I'm excited to explore.
441
00:42:42,980 --> 00:42:47,600
This is this is the short version. Um, but two things in particular I want to highlight.
442
00:42:47,600 --> 00:42:55,760
There is a scene from librarian Violet Fox called a librarian against I, or I think I should leave.
443
00:42:55,910 --> 00:42:57,800
That's, of course, a nice little pun.
444
00:42:58,310 --> 00:43:06,800
Um, and then there's also an article by history and digital humanities professor Cameron Blevins called a Large Language Model Walks into an archive.
445
00:43:07,220 --> 00:43:13,490
Um, but both of them have some really helpful suggestions about ways to think about AI and then also ways to use it in scholarship.
446
00:43:13,760 --> 00:43:22,090
Oh, cool. How about you, Shawn? Um, uh, I would recommend, uh, and maybe this has come up before, but the podcast feature on notebook and, um,
447
00:43:22,100 --> 00:43:32,810
not because I like it in particular because I find it just so infuriating, uh, so obvious and yet so, like a mirror up to society and, like, what do.
448
00:43:33,160 --> 00:43:39,100
We must be as humans that we could be so easily replicated in this AI podcast format.
449
00:43:39,130 --> 00:43:42,910
Oh, yeah. Um, so I. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. Interest there.
450
00:43:43,000 --> 00:43:44,980
Right? Yeah. That's good. Uh huh. Yeah.
451
00:43:45,100 --> 00:43:52,210
Uh, you know something I find myself saying to faculty a lot these days is that you are not as unpredictable as you think you are.
452
00:43:52,240 --> 00:43:56,110
Yes. Right. Yeah. I has a knack for revealing that.
453
00:43:56,140 --> 00:44:01,420
Yeah. So it's fun to throw random things that you would never podcast into.
454
00:44:01,960 --> 00:44:05,380
Um. Notebook 11, see what comes out like. Yes.
455
00:44:05,380 --> 00:44:09,160
The front page of the LTC website is a good one.
456
00:44:09,160 --> 00:44:14,110
Yeah. So we not only do scholarship, but we do scholarship of teaching.
457
00:44:14,110 --> 00:44:23,170
And I would I would also recommend if you have, you know, a couple of years of a friend group chat, uh, explore that and dump that in there.
458
00:44:23,590 --> 00:44:28,569
Oh that was, that was my most successful use. You know, it's good.
459
00:44:28,570 --> 00:44:31,750
Or the family group chat or. That can be fun, too. Yeah. Yeah.
460
00:44:32,050 --> 00:44:38,680
Well, um, this brings us to our end, and this is really been a fun conversation.
461
00:44:38,680 --> 00:44:42,640
Thank you so much for taking the time to come and talk with us today.
462
00:44:42,970 --> 00:44:49,750
Absolutely. This was great. Yeah. Thanks. The Year of Curiosity podcast is recorded on the campus of Carleton College.
463
00:44:50,020 --> 00:44:53,020
Your hosts are Jennifer Ross Wolf and me, George Cusack.
464
00:44:53,140 --> 00:44:58,900
Our producer is Dan Hurlbert, who records and edits each episode along with his team of hard working students.
465
00:44:59,560 --> 00:45:03,460
Our show notes are compiled and edited by Wiebke and are available on our website.
466
00:45:03,490 --> 00:45:11,140
Carlton Academy I, Mary Drew, maintains our Podbean account, which gets our episodes out to whatever platform you're currently listening on.
467
00:45:11,650 --> 00:45:20,140
Our theme music was composed by Nathan Wolfe Carleton, class of 27, and our mascot, Maisie was generated by Jennifer Ross Wolfe using Adobe Firefly.