TRANSKRIPTIO 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:01.840 --> 00:00:05.599
The infamous quote from You Can See Everything.
00:00:06.639 --> 00:00:11.279
They're not playing me, they're playing a character I created.
00:00:11.919 --> 00:00:15.199
So this was one of the main themes in the documentary.
00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:23.120
And if you haven't watched the documentary, spoiler spoiler alert, we will be revealing a lot of stuff today.
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:39.439
Um, and that was just one of the main themes that came out of that documentary, which was really interesting because that quote was something that Elizabeth Holmes had said in a uh New York Times article.
00:00:39.759 --> 00:00:42.479
So I'll read you a little bit of a summary.
00:00:42.719 --> 00:00:45.920
It's a contested quote dispute.
00:00:46.240 --> 00:01:08.159
Holmes and her partner Billy Evans have challenged a 2023 New York Times profile quote in which Holmes allegedly said they're not playing me, they're playing a character I created, which refers to um Amanda Seyfred's um portrayal of her in um in the docuseries uh uh The Dropout.
00:01:08.480 --> 00:01:20.319
Uh Evans claimed she actually said a character they created and asserted they have audio recordings, though declined to provide proof.
00:01:20.879 --> 00:01:24.799
So why is this quote so important in that documentary?
00:01:24.879 --> 00:01:25.840
Which is really great.
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:30.719
If you haven't watched it, it's coming out to streaming services, I think, end of November.
00:01:30.879 --> 00:01:40.560
I watched it in the theaters and it is crazy good because it's um it's got this Nathan Fielder style to it.
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:46.799
If you don't know who he is, he's a very um he's done a a bunch of different shows.
00:01:46.879 --> 00:01:56.319
Um, he's a very sort of uh awkward, he's got sort of this um absurd sort of humor that he brings to all his shows.
00:01:56.480 --> 00:02:04.799
So if you haven't watched his work, I recommend you watch either The Rehearsal or Nathan for You so you get a better understanding of his style.
00:02:04.959 --> 00:02:08.879
Otherwise, you go into this thing and you're like, what is this guy doing?
00:02:09.199 --> 00:02:21.120
Anyway, so the um Elizabeth Holmes, who if you don't know, is um uh was about to go to jail.
00:02:21.199 --> 00:02:46.719
It was 30 to 35 days before she was sent to prison for committing crimes of wire fraud, um, with respect to her innovation, her technology that um she claimed worked, which didn't, and it basically was defrauding investors of all this money because she claimed this invention worked.
00:02:46.800 --> 00:03:07.120
It was meant to take one drop of blood and have the ability to analyze it and give you all these full uh laboratory results from it, but um, all the demos were a scam, all the demos did were just smoke and mirrors, and so she this is 30 days before she goes to jail.
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:23.599
She is a bit of a character, which is something that in Nathan Fielder's shows, he he really fixates on bringing sort of like these different types of personalities and different types of people into his shows.
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:40.159
Anyway, so that quote came from uh one of the conversations um between the one of the directors or one of the producers, Nathan Elizabeth, and her husband.
00:03:40.560 --> 00:04:02.560
Um, the husband's also a bit of a character, he's extremely toxic, which I'll talk about in another video, because I think it um speaks a lot to her choice in men and in relationships, and I think was probably part of one of the reasons why things went as far as it did with her company.
00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:20.480
Um, she surrounds herself with maybe not the best choice of people, and um they claimed that every interview it was recommended to them that they record any interview that they do after she was found guilty.
00:04:21.199 --> 00:04:24.480
And they claim they have all these audio recordings.
00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:53.040
She did not say that in this New York Times interview, but they they, the husband, whose name is hold on a second, um Billy Evans, did not want to give that evidence over to like the documentary team, which is very odd and I think very telling because if you are so persistent in your claims that she never said that, it's so easy to clear her name.
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:54.720
Like, just give the recordings over.
00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:57.920
They're like, Oh, we scoured the recordings, we couldn't find it, we don't understand.
00:04:58.079 --> 00:05:00.160
We recorded all her interviews.
00:05:00.480 --> 00:05:02.959
Well, then just clear your name the easy way.
00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:12.240
You could have just honestly, and that documentary team, like they're that and especially that specific producer, Nathan Fielder.
00:05:12.480 --> 00:05:16.079
He's known for doing like crazy amounts of research.
00:05:16.399 --> 00:05:28.319
So for them, it would have been just like so easy just to give over this recording and have him, you know, listen to things, look things over, be like, oh yeah, I see what you're saying.
00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:30.079
That's like not what she said.
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:34.800
But they completely like refuse, completely refuse.
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:53.040
So I think, in all honesty, I think she did say it, and she um is trying to drive at the point that she's being like misrepresented in the media, but she's doing nothing to um to to clear her name.
00:05:53.120 --> 00:05:57.199
Like it was it was just such it was such an odd documentary.
00:05:57.759 --> 00:06:22.000
Quite honestly, she had an opportunity, she had an opportunity to just give the world her side of the story to completely change the narrative, and she was so closed off about it, and she just was like, nope, I didn't do it, I don't know what people are talking about, I don't know why people are targeting me, but it was so odd.
00:06:22.160 -->
Load full transcript
00:06:42.000
In any case, so it was just such such a strange dynamic between her and her husband, and it was also such a strange um thing to do before you go to prison.
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:46.160
Um, and she even said it in the documentary like I could be spending time with her kids.
00:06:46.319 --> 00:06:58.240
Like she's she before she went to prison, her um oldest child was a toddler, still on diapers, so probably easily two and under.
00:06:58.639 --> 00:07:01.680
And then the baby, she just had a baby.
00:07:01.920 --> 00:07:07.759
I mean, baby was still breastfeeding, uh, looked to be maybe about three months old.
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:08.959
I don't know.
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:12.160
And so she could have been fully spending time with her family.
00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:15.120
She chose to do this documentary, let them into her lives.
00:07:15.279 --> 00:07:21.279
If you're gonna take all that time and effort, would have been easy just to to clear a few things up.
00:07:21.439 --> 00:07:38.079
So I'm I'm actually uh quite surprised that um, you know, she didn't she didn't just hand over these alleged recordings that they have and just have them listen and hear that whatever was quoted by the New York Times was wrong.
00:07:38.240 --> 00:07:45.759
And the New York Times is pretty adamant in saying, like, this is this was the interview, this is what she said to us.
00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:51.920
And I believe them because, like I said, just hand over these recordings and it can be easily cleared up.
00:07:52.079 --> 00:08:06.240
And the New York Times will, I'm sure, happily retract because if they're clearly in the wrong, you know, they don't want to be seen as they don't want to have the reputation of a news outlet that you know just posts incorrect things.
00:08:06.639 --> 00:08:22.560
The other thing is with this quote, I think it is such an underlying theme in the whole thing because we also have this other, I want to call him a character because he's just a complete control freak, narcissist, the husband.
00:08:22.959 --> 00:08:44.559
And at times I looked at him and I didn't know if he was just playing things up for the audience because he knew it was a documentary, and um, in the middle of the documentary, it it's revealed that they wanted they wanted to be paid for it, which is you don't do that with documentaries.
00:08:44.639 --> 00:08:51.039
A documentary is meant to, you know, for like uh inform the public.
00:08:51.279 --> 00:08:57.919
Um, it's not meant, it's not like like a TV show where you're getting paid for it or a film where you're getting paid for it.
00:08:58.240 --> 00:09:02.639
And the um, you know, producers were like, no, we're not paying you.
00:09:02.879 --> 00:09:07.600
And then eventually they said, look, if you want us to be in it, you gotta pay us.
00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:28.879
So having that financial incentive, I don't know if it was a motivation for uh this person to just play things up on camera, to make it look like you know, everything it that he's like the the toxic husband, um, and to take some of the heat off of Elizabeth Holmes.
00:09:29.039 --> 00:09:30.080
I don't know.
00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:36.799
But definitely there was there was something clearly not right about that individual.
00:09:36.960 --> 00:10:12.080
I just don't know how much of it was authentic and how much of it was just meant for like shock value, um, and how much of it was meant um as a way to promote this guy's company because he was also um after Elizabeth went to jail, they wanted to carry on the the research and the innovation for this single drop of blood um uh piece of technology, which I think is crazy because nobody is going to trust you.
00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:14.879
After that, nobody is going to trust you.
00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:20.960
It's I don't know, like I said, this the whole thing was really, really bizarre.
00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:31.440
It was so bizarre to watch how the husband wanted to capitalize on Elizabeth's name and reputation, but her reputation is shit.
00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:34.559
So I don't know what he's trying to do.
00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:52.240
It was it was bananas and so absurd and really fit into sort of the Nathan Fielder sort of um type of personalities I think he puts on his shows sometimes, just these very like quirky people that you sort of find.
00:10:52.480 --> 00:11:16.000
Um in any case, so I don't know if that quote was relevant also to the husband, because I think I think the producers were trying to drop some clues about the personality of the husband, like through throughout without really calling it out, because then otherwise the audience doesn't get to decide.
00:11:16.080 --> 00:11:28.399
You know, it was sort of a little bit one of those documentaries where you want your audience members to make that decision for themselves, how they feel about these people, how they feel about the situation.
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:31.679
Um, so it might have just been sort of like that.
00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:39.360
That quote might have just been like a little clue for us to say, like, hey, these people are just playing it up for you a little bit.
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:51.840
And what I found really disturbing was that at one point the husband pulled, um Billy pulled Elizabeth aside and he's like uh coaching her basically on what to say.
00:11:52.000 --> 00:11:56.480
He's like, Oh, you're saying too much, and um talking to her.
00:11:56.639 --> 00:12:23.519
They were in um, I think it was like their San Diego home, and they were just sort of like trying to spend they it was a rental, they were just trying to spend time with family there before she went off to prison, before they moved to Texas where her um where the prison was because I think it was um uh easier for the family to go in and visit her at that type of of institution.
00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:35.600
Um but it was it was wild because he was just and she looked like
she looked like tired and exhausted.
00:12:35.759 --> 00:12:37.600
Obviously, she just has a baby.
00:12:37.679 --> 00:12:43.919
Like if anybody's a mom out there, you know, the the first year's so exhausting.
00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:59.600
You're up all night, you're always breastfeeding, like you know, the baby's developing very, very quickly, they're going through all these phases of development, it's like you know, they're teething, they're um trying to get their sleep cycles right.
00:12:59.679 --> 00:13:09.600
It's tricky, it's really hard, and so you know, she's just sort of like, okay, yes, agreeing with the husband, it was just such an odd dynamic.
00:13:09.919 --> 00:13:26.960
But one I think we should call into question because how much of it was real for the camera, and it also sort of just juxtaposes the whole um title of the documentary, you can see everything, but really how much are you seeing?
00:13:27.039 --> 00:13:35.039
Because are these people just like playing uh uh a role for us to believe in in some of the stuff they're telling us?
00:13:35.440 --> 00:13:36.399
I don't know.
00:13:36.799 --> 00:13:38.720
You tell me what do you think?
00:13:38.879 --> 00:13:44.960
What do you think, what do you think that that quote was put in there for?
00:13:45.360 --> 00:14:04.080
Because the the producers are very clever, like I said, go watch some of Nathan Fielder's stuff, go look at how he researches things and how he tries to sort of peel back complex problems in his other documentaries, even his comedy series, like he really tries to solve problems in different ways.
00:14:04.240 --> 00:14:10.240
So I feel like that was a very intentional um piece that they put in there for us.
00:14:10.480 --> 00:14:13.279
I just want to understand more why.
00:14:13.840 --> 00:14:22.480
Why, what else did that quote apply to that maybe we're not we're not fully recognizing?
00:14:23.039 --> 00:14:24.720
Anyway, you tell me.
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:38.720
Do you think how much if you've watched the documentary, how much of what the Elizabeth and Billy were doing, how much of it do you think was fake for us, fake for the camera?
00:14:38.879 --> 00:14:41.919
How much of it do you think was authentic?
00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:46.720
Do you um believe that the husband was like putting on a show for us?
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:47.679
I don't know.
00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:49.039
I want to hear from you.
00:14:49.279 --> 00:14:56.240
And do you think Elizabeth Holmes was uh do you think she was misquoted?
00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:02.559
Do you think they actually couldn't find that New York Times recording?
00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:09.679
Oh my god, and they they were just like, I they're just they're misquoting me in the media, they're portraying me as this evil person.
00:15:10.960 --> 00:15:12.399
Do you think that's what it is?
00:15:12.639 --> 00:15:14.639
Do you think the media is out to get her?
00:15:14.799 --> 00:15:15.600
I don't know.
00:15:15.840 --> 00:15:17.679
Drop it in the comments.
00:15:18.080 --> 00:15:24.080
I'll be making a couple of other videos on um different themes that I found in the documentary.
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:27.519
This is just the first one, and I will see you in the next video.
00:15:27.679 --> 00:15:28.720
Bye guys.