Jakson #428 Status Correction - Russell Paul Arthur on Transitioning from Citizen to Sovereign (Part 2) täydellinen litterointi

how it relates to the presentation that we're going to do today. And we've spoken a great deal about citizenship, about the realisation that most people are having today, and we most certainly have, coming into our own sovereign beingness, is that we've awakened to the fact that we are trapped in this system of modern day slavery. It's debt slavery, it's wage slavery, it's tax slavery, and it's modern day slavery to what I call a socio-economical shit show of control and extortion. Because everything that we're seeing with the structure of society has been established with a ruling crown and a ruling state, and it has been established with the two fundamental principles of how to control the populace and how to extort value from the populace. Because ultimately, the guys in charge, the guys and girls in charge, they are predatory, they are parasitical, and they are extracting value from the main populace. And I've come to the conclusion that they are insane, insane rulers and leaders that I think are a disgrace to humanity. Because if we was going to live in a wonderful society, a wonderful nation state, where people actually truly honoured and respected each other, and we had structures and systems that actually benefits life, we would be living in a very different world. And I'm going to leave it with that slide for that moment and pass it over to you, Roy. What's your thoughts on that? Well, I heard a funny one this week. It was somebody said, if Adam and Eve were Chinese, they would have ate the snake and the world would be a lot better. That's really good. I like that. And of course, there is there is or there has been a snake in the garden, right? It's the snake of deception, isn't it? It's the snake of invitation and temptation, isn't it? Because that's what this society is. It lures you in with the invitation to contract with an element of society, whether it be a bank, whether it be DVLA to register your vehicle, whether it be HM Land Registry. And of course, we have the temptation of money. You know, everyone's tempted by money, tempted by what money can buy. And obviously, a lot of people are bound to the system of money as a means to survive, not just thrive, not just wanting to make it in life, but to also survive. So the snake is well and truly in the garden and has caused absolute havoc. And we have fallen prey to the snake. This has gone on for probably thousands of years. But, you know, we know of hundreds, like the city of London, you know, that one square mile. Apparently, there was the Great Fire that was just destroyed all their titles and everything. And then they became the financial centre. So everything you look at, like the libraries and everything all around the world, everything is burning at the same time. It's all orchestrated. Everything's orchestrated. And no matter what rabble hole you go down, I mean, some people are kind of awake now after, say, the lockdown. It's unfortunately, it's about 100 times worse than what you think, you know, like you understand a lot of the stuff, but it like every single thing is designed to attack you. And the Masonic groups and everything, they pass on all their, you know, they keep it within. And for me, from what I'm looking at, I know you see these kind of so-called 13 controlling families and everything. Is there another layer above that? But the thing is, people wonder, like, who's the main person? But the way it's designed, they don't tell anyone everything. So everyone's got their own little piece of the puzzle. And they're happy because they get the golden handshake. They've got all the finances. They do the dirt. They don't care because they're looked after. Same with every politician you see around the world. I mean, look at what the salary is that's actually on paper and look at their wealth. And it's like, that doesn't add up. So that just shows somebody is actually putting money in their back pocket when the rest of us are looking the opposite direction. Yeah, that is so true. These people that are in positions of leadership, of power, of government, they are so corrupt. I mean, I was watching a documentary not so long ago and it was about a very high up senior politician in the Norwegian government. And she had taken a position in a major, major player in the fishing industry. And she was obviously taking money from this company and she was overseeing all their regulations and everything. And the fish that they were actually producing was actually poisoning the people in the local area because they were feeding the fish these specific pellets to make the fish grow bigger, you know, forcing growth and all the rest of it. And it was people making people so sick that the people selling the fish, the retailers had to actually put signs up next to that specific fish and say, listen, this fish has had this certain pellet, you know, be cautious if you're going to buy this. And she was involved in it. She was involved in the company. She was overseeing the part of the board, overseeing the regulations. She knew exactly what was happening with the fish. She was taking money from it. And she is in government. She's supposed to be there to serve and protect the people. So this is going on and a massive, massive thing. And just touching base on what you mentioned earlier about these things are planned. There are architects behind these these great disasters because they're operating on the motto of order out of chaos, right? For them to build their new system or their new structure, they need to destroy the old one. And we see it playing out in so many things today, in so many conflicts, so many wars. I mean, look what's happening that's going on in Palestine right now. You know, what's going on with that war, you know, just totally decimating the entire country, the infrastructure, the buildings, the people, everything else, the ethnic cleansing going on. Why? Well, it's in your face. You've got Trump coming out

saying, yep, we're going to build casinos, we're going to build hotels. And it's so blatant. How could you not, you know, how could you even not see that? It's just so obvious what they're doing that's in your face. And we've got to a place where the world is so insane and so dangerous that everyone's, it amazes me that there is a mass populace that turns a blind eye to it all. I mean, what's your thoughts on that? Well, I mean, if we look at Palestine, I'm not sure that we talk about it the last time I was talking to somebody else. But when the black and tans were in Ireland, they went to Palestine. And these are, it looked like ex-criminals. They were just horrible what they were doing to the Irish. So they went there. And if you talk about casinos, I mean, you know, the Muslims are against gambling. So straight away. And if you look at Israel, you know, it was like the gay capital of the world. Like everybody going in there, all the flags and everything. That's another thing, you know, it's kind of like rubbing it in their face. And I mean, we look at, I think, I didn't even watch the whole lot of it, but there was another pony show during the week where, you know, another, you know, Trump getting so-called assassinated. Like, I mean, the last time I exposed that and the episode was removed. So that says something. Yeah. I mean, every single thing is just an attack and it's like, they wave something here. But when you hear of people that actually have been there and looked at it, what they've done, the genocide there, that is true. Yes. It's all kind of like, you know, the money's over here, controlling everything, all the armaments. Like what I say is sometimes people think they haven't any, they're not touching this. Oh, it's nothing to do with me. If you have your pension in BlackRock, if you have your pension that's in all these armament companies, that's on you. Why would you want your money to be grown on that? You need to take that out on Nestle. I don't know. Like another one like Nestle, they went to like in Africa with the pregnant women, you know, like 10 million children died. And it's kind of like, not to see here. How they are not hanging from a tree is beyond me. I mean, that is insane. They knew it. They waited till the women dried up, knowing exactly the timeframe. The water they were given them was dirty water and the children died from infection, which they knew would happen. I will never buy a Nestle product. The minute they see Nestle, nowhere. I'm so glad, Roy, that you brought it back to the individual because, and let's relate this back to citizenship, because to a degree, to a degree, all of us as citizens of a nation state who are working within the economy, working within commerce, if we've got a corporation, which is a franchise of the Crown Estate, if we're paying tax up to Caesar, the Crown Estate, that's funding the military, that's funding wars, that's funding these psychopaths that are going into these foreign

lands, they're completely decimating countries, because it's all about taking over the people and the resources of the land and all the rest of it to make more money, more control, more extortion. But we're a part of that. You know, so what we're doing here is we're realising that, hey, hold tight. I personally have a moral obligation here to do something about it, because I'm not completely helpless. There are things I can do about it. The first thing I can do is realise the atrocity for what it is, see the treason, see the corruption, see the evilness, and then make a decision. Do I want to continue participating in this as a part of this, albeit a small part, or do I want to now start withdrawing myself from this system, so I can take my energy, my resources, and divert it into the world that I want to see? And that's, hopefully, the direction or the ultimate outcome that we're all going to go towards, when enough of us become a sovereign authority and decide to move forward, move away from citizenship. That brings me on to this next slide, Roy. We spoke about this in great detail before, I think, in the previous presentation, which was about the deception and the fraud of citizenship, because at birth registration, each one of us does have our life placed into the legal bondage with the Crown Estate, and we do get converted into a citizen. And as we explained in the previous presentation, the citizen is not real. It's a legal title, it's a legal entity, and a legal status, a legal person, as defined in law, that only exists as a character of law, which means it's the only paper. And there was a term for this called Ons Logis, which is a Roman term, which described a Roman citizen. And Ons Logis meant that a Roman citizen had the ability to operate within the legal framework of the nation-state, to hold property, to hold titles, but didn't have any physicality. It didn't exist in real life, it was a fiction. So the citizen is a legal franchise that's under the paramount authority of the Crown Estate, the citizen has diminished civil rights, and each one of us, as a living man or woman, have been duped into playing the role of a citizen, rather than playing, or not playing, but rather than standing in our real presence, our true and original status and standing as a living man or woman. So I guess what I want to really impress upon yourself and your audience is that citizenship is a status of deception and fraud. We have been defrauded into playing this legal title and legal entity within a legal system that doesn't actually work. It's a world of fiction. It's a world of legal bondage. And hopefully, between us, we're going to awaken people up to this reality. I'd be interested to get your perspective on this, Rowan. Well, I mentioned about, you know, in America, that basically, if they go to war, you're called in. Conscription is active in a lot of countries. And the thing is, I think most people don't realise, like, I know somebody, he was a

prison guard for a military. So they can easily lock up people as well that are military. And when they come back, because, yeah, if I go out and kill somebody, yeah, I've committed a crime. You give us both military vests, we go out and we kill thousands of people. Hey, good job, here's a medal. And the thing is, when you look at the people that come back, they suffer from PTSD, high suicide rate and everything. Because deep down, you know, you shouldn't be killing somebody. And just because some shithead over in politics, with somebody controlling his strings, decides to say, oh, let's kill him. Let's attack them. Let's destroy their nation. Because we've seen it, Libya, a guy that was actually looking after his people. And now look at Libya, they've destroyed it. And the same for a few other countries. So when you look at that, that's why they can actually bring in and go, hey, you're going on the front line. Same probably in Ukraine and everything, because, oh, you know, I reckon if you got the letter, they won't address the letter as you, the individual, you, the living soul. It'll be you, the corporate entity, which is under the citizenship. Yes. And these awful situations that men and women get themselves into, like conscription and then going to fight for the pride of the nation, the rest of it, this would never ever happen if we actually had an education system that actually taught people about the moralities of life, about virtues of life, about honour and respect for all human beings. We just wouldn't have it. But of course, we have an education system that has purposely been designed to compartmentalise people, to dumb them down, to teach them tuition rather than teach them how to align with their intuition and express their true self and their true purpose. So, I mean, for example, I've got three teenagers now, teenagers, a couple of them have just left the education system, and I've sat down and had a conversation with them and they still don't know why they're here, what their purpose is in life, and they still don't know what to do next. And that is a large percentage of the children that go through these education systems. And then what happens? Of course, they go out, they see the sign up on the wall, join the army, we'll give you this, we'll give you that, we'll give you that. And of course, they're lambs to the slaughter, aren't they? It's the sacrifice of the innocents again, isn't it? It's bad minutes, it's teaching these young, innocent people that, hey, it's okay to kill, it's okay to shoot, it's okay to go to another country, rob, steal, pillage, as long as you're wearing this uniform and you're doing it for us. So, I completely relate to what you're saying. It's just so twisted and so inverted. And the way that, like you see it in the films, but it must be that way, because otherwise, you know, the way they just scream at people. So, as you're being trained, they're basically degrading you, that you're a piece of shit and I'm better than you. And it's like, so what they're basically doing is they're taking your soul away, so you can just do what I say. And it's the same with, if you look at anyone in the business sector or all these corporations and everything, it's the same with the secret services, like the Freemasons and all that. Like a lot of the time, they get them to do things. I mean, I've got this from somebody that had different levels, you know, grandfather, you know, you have to kind of masturbate in front of the people, do weird shit, right? Not everyone will do that, but the people that do it, they go on to the next level, not everyone will do it. And while they're doing this, they're just saying, who'll do anything? And then they have it on each other, so they've got all the witnesses. Okay, hey, you're going to get this position as leader, but we know what you've done, so you'll do exactly what we want. And people wonder how it happened. And it's just little layers, slowly but surely. And yeah, it's almost like if we look at the corporations, for example, you know, you get into the larger corporations, they're very much like cults, aren't they? It's a cult-like mentality. And then now you're all wearing the same uniform, which means you're now uniform in the form of being united in whatever banner slogan that you're going under. And of course, if you don't stay conformed, if you are not affirming the principles of this organisation and the actions they want you to do, then of course you're humiliated, you're shamed, you're outcast, you're isolated, you don't get ahead, and you eventually end up leaving the organisation. So it's either, you know, you're with us and doing what we're doing, or you're off and gone. And these corporations, these large organisations that are doing these things, this hierarchical structure, like you quite rightly said, it's robbing people of their sovereignty. It's robbing people of their personal free will choice. It's robbing people from the ability to actually express themselves and actually contribute themselves to the organisation, isn't it? This is what we're doing. This is how we're doing it. And you must conform to this thing. And us at the top, we're going to call the shots and everyone else below must fall in line. That's to me, is just a terrible, terrible way to structure an organisation and indeed structure a society. And during the lockdown, a load of them insisted on the jab. And what's strange is they all have their flags outside their building, which was the reason why they have a flag under their corporation. You know, it's like you're inside their den, they make the rules. Just like I told you prior to recording Facebook, I got removed today. It's like. Not only did they make the rules, they use coercion, they use threats, they use intimidation. I remember when that pandemic saga hit and I was completely, I was not buying into any of it at all, not from get go one. I was really alone around the rest

of society because everyone else was falling for it like a sinker. And I remember walking, where I was at the time, I was in a place called Bournemouth on the south coast of England, and I was walking down the shopping district and I could see these big signs saying, you know, do one for society, don't go outside, stay indoors, you're a threat, you could cause illness to someone else. I had a big poster, an advertisement. I was thinking, that is awful. That's so bad, you know, to turn around to people and say, you're a threat, you're this, you're that, you're a bad person because you're going out because you're not doing what we say. But this, unfortunately, is how society has been structured. And of course, this, you know, is one of the fundamental issues with citizenship, with people being part of a culture, like the British culture or the Irish culture. It's right there in the word. Shall we move on to the next slide, Roy? Yeah, definitely. Good. So we touched base on this on the first presentation, which was sovereignty as a psycho-spiritual experience. We're talking about the actual internal experience of personal sovereignty with the mind, soul and the heart. And I come to the conclusion, and this is, of course, my conclusion, that sovereignty is a divine awareness and knowledge that you do have the absolute power and inherent right to determine, direct and govern the matters of your own life in accordance with your own free will and personal conscience, doing so with freedom from any other authority in this world. And one of the things that we practise in my organisation really do on our own respect is sovereign free will. The ability for a human being to always have the choice to accept or reject something, to go left or to go right. Yeah. So that's very much different to the way societies are structured today with citizenship, because you don't have a choice to accept or reject. Legislative laws are being brought into fruition. They are being set up with rules and regulations that are being passed down to the public agencies that are then writing public policies that define the behaviours and activities of the humans that they regulate in whatever sphere of life they regulate. And therefore, they've taken the ability for someone to exercise their sovereign free will and accept or reject something because that's the legislative law. That's the way we say it must happen. And if you don't do what we say or if you violate what we say, then there's going to be prosecution and there's going to be penalty, you know. So it's do what we say or you pay the fine or do the time. So that's a big thing for us. I'd be interested to get your take on sovereignty as a psycho-spiritual experience, Rod. Well, what I would actually encourage is we went deep into this the last time and I would say go back and listen, but just say on how the whole EU thing, because, you know, the UK was in it and then it was like, oh, Brexit and then other countries want to come out of it. But I saw one of the MEPs and how they're voting on these different things. And he had to go into a room accompanied by somebody. He wasn't allowed to bring a video camera. He wasn't able to take the phone. He could make a few notes. And that was on bills that were being passed. If we look at Ersta Wendele, you know, you can see the evil in her face. What has she done? Was she voted in? No, she was put to place there. The whole thing was orchestrated. And everything is all about just controlling each nation so that now you don't think you have a sovereign country, that you're part of the EU and the EU says, all right, let's bring in all these guys on the boat who's going to rape, kill and pillage. And we'll give them free accommodation, free health and everything. And we're supposed to go, great. That sounds like a good plan. So if you have all individuals together that understand what's going on in the world, it's nothing like that would ever happen. And it's all orchestrated. And people then look at the MEPs and you can see the voting record. It's like everything is orchestrated, that it's so close that, you know, they make it look like, oh, the opposition is on our side. Let's back them. So then when the next election comes around, yes, they're in. And then they do worse. It's a whole, I mean, there's different things. There's like same bird with a different wing or it's the same ass with a different cheek. And that's the EU in itself as well. Yeah. So, I mean, what you're describing there is the illusion of democracy, right? So, you know, you've got these people in power and there's obviously these national elections and you and the citizens are under the false impression that they get to elect who's going to be in government. But what you're actually electing is pre-selected candidates, right? These people have been groomed, they've been placed into position and you're just giving a selection of people to choose from. And it's very hard to get into that position and you can only get into that position where you can form a government or be in a powerful leadership position in these governments if you've jumped through a certain amount of hoops and we don't really need to go into the great detail what they're all about. And of course, you may think that you get to choose the government, but even if you could choose the government, you don't get to choose how they govern you, okay? And if we were to look at the British government, for example, the UK government, then it's right there in your face. You've got His Majesty's government, right? So, that's telling you it's controlled by the crown, the government, and then you have His Majesty's loyal opposition. So, that tells you in the UK that the crown governs both sides of the government, yeah? And the politicians and the ministers of the UK government, before they can even take a seat in parliament, they might have to sign an oath, swear oath and allegiance to the actual crown.

And the crown itself is administrating the UK government and it does it through the senior civil service. And I've got a fantastic recommendation for you in your audience. If they go online, there is a fantastic interview from a chap, I'm not sure if I remember his name, but I think his name is Dominic Cummings. He used to be a very senior politician in the UK government. And then he got kicked out of the government, big deal it was, it was all splashed over the newspapers at the time. And then he did an expose, he became a whistleblower. And in this documentary, where he was explaining how government works, it was so fascinating and so revealing. As he was saying, when they go into the cabinet meetings, what happens is all members of the cabinet of the government that you think are making decisions about your life, controlling all the rest of it, they sit down in this cabinet meeting office, and he said, what happens is the senior civil service come along, because they don't know what they're going to talk about in a meeting. And the senior civil service hand each secretary a document. And then they're reading from the document, he says everything's scripted. He said they don't know what they're going to discuss when they get into the meeting. And then they're handed the scripts of what they're going to discuss in that particular meeting. So everything's already been predetermined. It's been pre decided. And it's all come from the top down the crown. So the government itself doesn't have sovereignty. You as a citizen certainly don't have sovereignty as part of this entire structure. And you know, if we're going to see positive change in this world, then something needs to change, because the current system is definitely not here for our best interests. And I'm not sure that we talk about this, but I know that I don't vote because it's like saying, oh, I'm giving you power over me. And just curious about yourself, because there's a few people I know that kind of, you know, whether they're natural law, common law, sovereignty, the different things, they're similar, they don't, they don't vote. And they're just about yourself. Absolutely 100%. As we're going to get into in these slides, we do, as part of this procedure that I'm going to share with you the status correction, we do a declaration of status. And we, you know, we make it very clear that we're rescinding all votes, sending all voters registrations. And we will do a royal denouncement where we denounce the royal crown. So let's move on to the next slide. Just since you mentioned, just because we mentioned royalty, because I'm surprised so many people don't know this, those in the north do, but like Prince Charles, no, King Charles, I mean, we know about his brother, Prince Andrew and the Epsteinine, but like, if you go back years, his best friend was Jimmy Saville, like, you know, like cut for necrophilia, for paedophilia, for everything. And it was all hushed up. And there was another friend, I forget his name, he was a murderer, another pedo. Like, so you show me your friends, I tell you who you are. Like, do you think they don't know? I saw a one, somebody had a recording of a child going down Buckingham palace, naked and just fell to the ground. And it was all, see, nothing to see here. They're all part of it. And so like, when I see people out waving our flags and everything, it's like, how can you be so asleep not to see what's going on when it's in plain sight for me and for others? Yeah. So it's, there's a term for it, isn't it? And it's wilful ignorance. Wilful ignorance, just ignore. That's the word, isn't it? To ignore it and not really look into it, to not, to really just accept it at face value and not go any, any further. Because unfortunately, most people are superficial. You know, most people are not interested in going into things deeply, and they just want to continue with a very simple and basic life. And that's perfectly fine. That's what you want to do. But unfortunately, in this world, you're going to get bit on the arse very badly. That's what you're going to do. But I just want to, before we move on to this next slide, Roy, just to touch base again on that royal family, the King Charles and the Windsors and all the rest of it, you know, they're not actually British heritage. They're from Germanic roots. So the whole thing is just preposterous. It's, you know, it's insane. They're not even, it's fraudulent. They're not even, they're not even based in their family tree in the UK or the British Isles. So, you know, the audience should look at that, look into it. And when you start to see these things, you start to reveal the deceptions that are going on. So the status correction. So you can perform a status correction, you can correct your status in relation to the nation state. And it's called a status correction, Roy, because that's what you're actually doing. You're actually unwinding from citizenship, and you are severing and separating your actual life from that legal title that belongs to the Crown Estate, which is a fiction in law. It's a character in law. It doesn't exist, a UK citizen. And so you're correcting your status to come forward as a living man or woman as your true original status with your true sovereign authority. And this is actually a lawful procedure. This, you can execute a lawful procedure to rescind and cancel citizenship and declare sovereign authority to govern your own life and estate. And I want to make a very clear distinction here. This is a lawful procedure and not a legal procedure. Because you can change your status with the nation state by going through a legal procedure. So for example, you could become a foreign national. Yeah. You could become a non-citizen. You could become an expatriate. And there are various other different titles that the Crown Estate offers to someone to say that, okay, you're no longer a resident of the United Kingdom. You're going to live

abroad. You're no longer going to be part of our Crown Commonwealth. But these legal procedures, they are all legal titles that keep you legally bound to the Crown Estate and in their venue and jurisdiction with authority over your life. So what we're doing here has nothing to do with a legal procedure. We are not filing any legal forms. We are not seeking permission. We are not seeking licence. We're not taking on any legal titles. We are doing a completely independent lawful procedure with this status correction. Roy, over to you. I'm just curious because you mentioned resident. When someone has a residency permit, not citizenship, how does that work? Is that good or bad? Yes, this comes down to visa rules, doesn't it? And visa exemptions and what kind of residential status that you have in the country. So for example, as you know, I'm in Bangkok right now. And if I wanted to, I could become a foreign resident in this country. And all that basically means is I've decided to come settle myself here for an extensive period of time. And they want me to become a foreign resident because the moment I say I'm going to settle here for six months or more, they can then start bringing me into their tax system and taking money for my income. So again, it goes back to controlling extortion. It comes back to them claiming venue jurisdiction over you so they can control your activities, so they can extort your value. So all these names, whether it's a foreign resident, a non-national or anything else that they say is a legal status where you're not fully committed as a fully fledged citizen, it's just another way for them to bind you or keep you bound to their system of control and extortion. And of course, if Bangkok can take someone from the United Kingdom and bind them into their financial system and tax system over a certain amount of period, that tells you that all these nation states are working in collusion with the same system. So, you know, let's be very clear. If you're going to do a status correction, unless you want to end up back in the system, I would avoid any legal procedures. I wouldn't fill in any legal forms. If you really want true sovereign authority and independence of the system, then the only way to do it is to execute a lawful procedure. Do you have anything else to add to that? Yeah, because you might cover it, but regarding the passport then, because does this affect getting a passport? And I know there's people saying you don't need a passport. There's ways around that as well. So I don't know where you stand on a passport because I know you're going travelling now. So do you hold a passport? That's a really great question. And that is a very important thing that you said. Do I hold a passport? So let's look at the passport. I've got a British passport, right? So that's been granted to me by the Crown Estate and I am holding the passport as a legal title holder of the passport. That means I am in an implied trust arrangement with

the UK Passport Office and the Crown Estate where they've designated me as a trustee of the passport. However, I, through my knowledge, through my lawful procedures, have executed a private passport trust because I've corrected my status, which is what we're going to go through in this presentation. I've now come forward as the living man and woman in my true status and standing. I've exposed the fraud of the citizen. And what I've done is I've claimed the passport in law and equity. Let's focus on the equity aspect of that. Equity is a law that gives you remedy to correct any errors, frauds or injustices. So now that I have exposed the fraud of citizenship and the injustice of it, I'm able to now use the law of equity to get a remedy and solution. And my solution is to claim the passport as a living man, place it into a private property trust where I now govern the passport under private laws that protects my equitable interest in the passport. I position myself as the living beneficiary of the passport, which means I can now benefit from use of the passport and the passport office are appointed as the trustees and the legal title holders. Should anything happen that I'm not happy with, if there is an unjust action regarding my use of that passport, I can now go back to the passport office in a course of law of equity to get remedy from that situation. So I'm still using the passport, but I'm not using it as a citizen. I'm not a holder of the passport. I'm now using it as the living beneficiary of the passport with no legal bondage and no personal liability because it's contained in a private trust. Does that make sense to you? It does. It does. And I'm assuming it's the exact same thing, but you've just changed the ownership. It's like you're no longer just the carrier. You're no longer the man. Reverse the trust dynamics. Rather than me playing along with the fiction, I've gone actually now I'm correcting my status. I'm now taking control of this situation and I'm now pulling it into this private trust. And this also aligns with the law of necessity. So there is a law called the law of necessity. And what the law of necessity does, it permits you to bend the rules and violate a law if your life is at harm or at risk or has been deprived from something, whether that's freedom, whether that's your property, then you are permitted when it's just to bend the law, to violate a law. So we can utilise the law of necessity to sometimes do things that we're not allowed to do, where actually we are allowed to do it if we are actually protecting our freedoms and our rights and our life. All right. So I'm not sure if you've been aware of the law of necessity yourself in your work? I've come across it, but I haven't gone down. Yeah, because what I found is there were so many different things to be doing that I'd go down and I'd do one thing. I got stamps because I ordered the stamps and I was looking at the flags and everything. And it's like when I found

that it became overwhelming, I always stepped away and I go, OK, what's important? The same with the battles that I was having. If it was a small battle financially or something, I just go, it's not worth the fight because whether it's 50 dollars or whatever, or 50,000 or 10,000, choose the battles and go for the bigger ones because, you know, it's the same time with correspondence and everything. Yeah, you do have to be very conscientious of your time and your energy and focus in this world because, you know, you can get pulled in so many different directions and so many different distractions. Let's please move on to that next slide then, we're going to get to the three components of the status correction. So again, the status correction is to sever and separate your actual life as a living man or woman from the citizen, which we know is a fiction in law, is a legal person, legal title and legal entity that actually belongs to the Crown Estate. And when you execute these three lawful procedures, you actually do lawfully and in equity, sever and separate your life from the citizen. And in doing so, you sever your life from the Crown Estate because the Crown Estate only has control over your life through the citizen. That is the legal rejoinder. That is the connection and the legal bondage. And the three components of a status correction are known as an international will, an indivisible trust and a declaration of status. So these three lawful procedures, these three components is what separates the severage your life. We're going to get separated your life from the Crown Estate and we'll get into that. So let's begin with the international will. So the international will is a will that is recognised internationally. Okay, so the moment you create an international will, it will be recognised and honoured by all nation states worldwide. And that's perfect because when we express our will to sever and separate our life from the citizen, we do want it recognised in all nation states because we do want to sever and separate our life from all forms of bondage and from all nation states. And this international will, Roy, is a hybrid will. So what it actually is, it's the last will and testament of the citizen and it's the living will of the living man or woman going forward. Because in this international will, we want to make it very clear that we are no longer acting in this world as the citizen. We state and substantiate all the facts why we are not the citizen. And then we then start, we finish the document with the living will, the living testament of us as a living man or woman, where we declare all the facts why our true status is of a living man or woman sovereign authority. And this international will, and you're seeing what you're seeing now is an example of my one, it becomes recognised and recorded in a court. And we have our own private court that does that. And it becomes adjudicated as a fact of law. Adjudicated means there is a final decision made that this international will is a fact of law, which means everything declared in this international will becomes a fact of law, which must be honoured and respected by all courts in law. And we also have the international will public notary. So this is a very important component. This is the starting process. This is the initiation. This is where it all begins, where we come out with this international will, where we express our will in this document that declares, hey, I'm no longer the citizen, I'm the living man or woman going forward. So the question I've got for you, Roy, are you, do you have any experience with this international will? Is this something that you're familiar with? No, no. And I mean, like with wills, like, I think we touched on the last one, but with probate, even if it's your husband or wife, sometimes the accounts or it was in his account and you think it just transfers automatically, they constantly think away as not giving you. And, you know, say the last parent passes, sometimes you can be like two years going through probate. So does this supersede all that? And because what I'm hearing is a lot of people are saying, oh, you need the trust. The trust is the way around us. You have to put the trust. With what you're saying there, once that's done and authorised, does that prevent you having to get a trust? This is the starting point. So you must, you must 100% do this because once you've made a will, you put a will in place that states how the value of your life in the state is going to operate going forward, then that does exclude you from a legislative act, which is known as the amendment of wills, that states if a citizen has not created a will, then by default, the Crown Estate can execute laws and claim the estate upon your death. So that's very important. But you do, once you've done this international will, you've done the status correction, you do then need to place your estate into private trusts, where they are placed into a trust management, which means once it's all secured in trust under trust management, and there is a line of succession attached to the trust and the estate, then your family members, your inheritors, your heirs to your estate, they no longer have to go to a probate court, because the trustees are able to distribute, divide your estate to the beneficiaries of the trust, which again, will be your family members, because a probate court, we look at the word probate, probate means to prove, and the whole point of your family members going to a probate court is to prove that they have a right to claim the estate. And that means they must come to the court with all the relevant documents and the solicitor to make that claim. And only a judge in a probate court scenario can authorise the distribution of your estate, because once you've passed away, because you were the only authorised signatory to your estate, which means you're the only one that could have ever have authorised the

transfer of your assets and interests, in your absence, only a judge can then be the authorisation, because of course, the judge represents the state. And of course, you were a legal enfranchiser of the state, aka a citizen. So a probate court is only necessary if you haven't done a last will and testament, or if you have done a last will and testament, your family members still have to go to court, because your instructions in the will still need to be authorised by a judge, because only a judge can create a court order for your family to get access to the assets and interests. Does that make sense? No, definitely. And the thing is, the problem with when it comes through probate and everything, it's like when there's assets there, the rats come out of the sewer, and they just, and then you're trying to defend yourself and prove, hey, they don't. And it's like, oh, I had this agreement with the deceased. And it's like, and unfortunately, I mean, I've had so many court cases, they're all as corrupt as can be. So who's to know that if it's a real high level, a million plus property, they don't go to the judge and go, here's 50k there. And he's like, you can't trust them. You cannot trust the courts. So I think this is gold. Yeah, it's called when you end up in a probate court scenario, it's called an interstate. You've died interstate. Inter is another word for enter. So when you die, the state enters into the frame, because they want to administrate the division and distribution of your estate. And of course, they are there to make money from you. The courts are going to make money, the judge is going to make money, the solicitor is going to make money. And of course, the bill needs to be settled for the tax man who's then going to come in with an inheritance tax, which is 40% of the 375,000 threshold. And your family members are going to walk out with 40-30% of what you left behind for them. And of course, they're going to be ones left stuck with paying all the bills and all the rest of it and going through the nightmare of the probate court. So the last thing you want is probate court process. And the reality is, if your estate ends up with probate court, it's because you didn't do any estate planning. And we're going to talk about that, Roy, in these upcoming podcasts is how you could actually do private estate planning to secure all your assets and interests so that your future and the future of your family is secure. Are you okay to move on to the next slide? Yeah, but just like this is kind of a little tangent, but it's something that always kind of baffled me. When somebody dies, they come along as if they own the body and they just take it away instead of you deciding, okay, look, I want them there. You decide your funeral home, whatever way you want to do it, whether you want to put them in a little box and do what you want, you're not. They take it away as if they have control of the body. And it's like you have to then go, you know, like, especially if there's a coroner's report, it's like four months. I mean, what bullshit is that? Everything is kind of like they have control, especially when you've lost a loved one, the stress involved in it. But I always felt like with anyone, any of the loved ones that I've seen, it's like they take it and it's like they're in control of the body. And how are they the right to that? And can you change that? Yes, you can change that. So 100%. If you're still acting in this world as a citizen, and you're acting in ignorance, and you've done no estate planning, and you haven't thought about the end of life, you haven't planned or prepared the end of life, then unfortunately, you're going to go through the mechanics of the system. And the system is obviously going to chew you over and go through all these procedures you just mentioned. Alternatively, if you decide that you're going to step into your own sovereign authority and power and take control of your own matters of your life and estate, then you would go through this process of doing international will, you go through the process of setting up everything up to private trust, and relate getting back to the point of the funeral, you would then create what's known as an advanced funeral directive. And what that basically does is that is very similar to an international will, you are stating everything that you want to happen to your body at the point of death, you want to stay in it from the very first moments after your death, what happens after your body after it's been recovered from the location where it's going to be placed, how it's replaced there, right down to how your family members are going to be informed, what you want the medical practitioners to do or not do, and where your body right down to whether it's going to be cremated, or whether you want to go for a funeral. So you're planning the whole thing up front in advance. And of course, that requires you to contemplate the end of your life, what's going to happen. So yeah, there is a process to do that where you can avoid all the long withdrawn processes that these, you know, public agencies put you and your family through when you passed away. So 100%. Right, let's move on to the next lawful procedure that forms part of a status correction. So the next component of a status correction is for you to issue a trust, known as inter vivos trust. And inter vivos is a Latin term, which means for the living. Okay, and inter vivos is also recognised as being a divine trust, because it's actually a trust set up as a private, what's the word, covenant, a private covenant between the living man or woman and the divine source of creation. Okay, so it's between the original source, the original authority, and then you as the sovereign authority who has bestowed life, endowed life in the divine source of creation. And what you actually do with the inter vivos trust, is you actually place your actual life as a living man or woman into a

trust arrangement. And this trust, by the way, is recognised in law. So what happens is, you place your trust, your life into a living trust, which is a divine trust, and where your actual life becomes private property of the trust, which is governed by the terms of the trust, the terms of the trust that you create as a sovereign authority, as your own private law. And then what happens is, the moment you've placed your life into this trust, your life becomes protected from any claims from anyone outside of the trust arrangement, because for anyone to claim any value from your life, they must actually have an agreement or a contract in place with the trust. So that begs the question, why are we creating an inter vivos trust as a status correction? We're doing it, and I'm going to expose this in future podcasts, because at the moment, your life has actually been placed into a sovereign trust arrangement with the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate have actually claimed your life and placed it into a trust arrangement as part of the Crown Commonwealth, so they can securitise your life, securitise your creative life force, securitise the value of everything that you do within their public domain under their control, so that they can fund the nation state by borrowing money from the bank. Your life, captured in trust, is collateral secured against the money they borrow from the banks. And of course, they've done that through deception and fraud, because it's an undisclosed trust arrangement. And because everything we're doing in estates correction is performed in law and equity, we're forming this trust in equity as a remedy and solution to correct the situation of being in that fraudulent position with the Crown Estate. And the moment, Roy, that we place, create this document, place our life into this document, the moment we autograph and fingerprint this document, that's it. Our claim to our life in this trust supersedes any other claim made by any other person, organisation, Crown or state, and where the claim that they currently have, that places our life into their Crown Commonwealth, becomes untenable, becomes illegal, unlawful, criminal. And all of this is done as an adjudicated fact of law, and again, once your life is placed into this trust, anything that you create, or anything you own, which is your estate, again, avoids probate, because you've secured everything into a trust arrangement. So I guess what I want to ask you, Roy, is, have you ever heard of this Intervivo's trust? Is this something you're familiar with? And of course, I would like to get your perspective on what I've just stated. Well, I've heard of the trust, and I've heard of like that it avoids the probate and everything, not in the way that you've just said it. But what I'm curious about is, like a lot of the cards will start tumbling down if everybody became aware of this. How many people are actually doing like, is there money that actually are doing this thing? Because I mean, I've read a lot of books, I've done a lot of stuff, and not the way that you're explaining it. So it seems like there's very little, but would I be correct in thinking that once the masses start figuring this out, the game is up? That's such an interesting statement and question you just made there. Let's unpack that. There are, as far as I'm aware, of course, I have a limited perspective, there's not many people that are going through this process, and not many organisations that are going through this process. Because again, this whole process that we're doing, it's unprecedented, it is part of the sovereignty movement, and we are the pioneers moving forward for a new future for humanity. But I do know that there are private organisations that are going through these lawful procedures with their own communities, and it's happening on a small, small scale. But of course, as we grow in numbers, as we grow into the future, more and more people are going to come into our societies, and they're going to go through this process of creating these trusts, and then we'll start to see the change. However, I don't think this is going to be something that happens en masse, because people just simply en masse, most of the population just again, are in a state of ignorance or in a state of being self-involved. It's, you know, it's the century of me, nobody's really interested in these lawful matters. And let's be honest, you know, this can be, this takes time, this is not something that you can just step into and, you know, read the document in one day, and you know, off you go, because everything you do these documents, Roy, you have to stand by these words, you have to be able to uphold these words, if you are ever put under the spotlight by a public authority, or by a public court, you must be able to defend your position and defend what you've done in any lawful procedure. And that takes months. So for people to come into our society and academy, it takes them months to study this document, to integrate the words of this document, until they get to a point where they're confident and certain about issuing the document, standing by it. And I personally think that us that are doing this, this work, which is the few at the moment, I personally believe, I don't know, I believe it, I believe it, I assume that it might happen is that we will eventually become the new leaders of a new world paradigm, where we will then put into place the right structures and the right systems that do actually serve and benefit everybody else, and where everybody else will just fall into place and go along with what we're doing, because we're serving their best interests. So no, not everybody's doing it. Do I think it'll happen en masse? Probably not. But those of us that are doing it, we certainly are putting ourselves into very powerful positions to be being able to lead the populace going forward. And because I've, you know, with just all the different people that I've

been looking at over the years, like, I don't know, was it Jermaine Howes or one of them, and he was like, they have the folder, but they're bringing the folder around with them, so that if they're stopped by the cops, if they're, whatever the situation, then instead of having to remember everything, they're able to go, which isn't great, because I mean, you know, you don't want to be bringing all these documentations around with you either, but I'm just curious, what's your thoughts on that? Yeah, so let's look at the document procedure. One thing that's very important to know is that every document that you create is a private document, for starters. So it's private and confidential. No one else, especially nobody in the public, has the authority or right to view the private document. And when it comes to situations where you're going through the public domain, or you're interacting with public agencies or authorities, and, you know, they are trying to, you know, they have a dispute with you, or they're trying to attach some sort of claim or penalty of charge against your life, then the best thing to do in that situation is to not get into a defensive position, not start putting out lots of documents, because once you've set up your life in a state with private trusts, if they want to issue you a charge or a bill or something, because they want to claim something from you, you just accept it. Thank you very much. I'll deal with this matter in two or three days time, once I've had a moment to review this document and all the rest of it. So you would just sign it, accept it, and go off. And then what you would do, and you're going to learn about this as we go through these podcasts, is that you're able to then take that document, you're able to claim that document, you're able to secure it into a private trust. And then you can send the document as private property of a private trust straight back to the issuing officer and appoint them as a trustee with a legal title and legal liability to settle the matter. And once you've claimed your estate in the system, and again, we're going to go through this in future podcasts, you can actually use the equity of your estate to settle and discharge any claims and debts. So what we're doing here is we're making it very simple and streamlined when it comes to interacting with public agencies, but there is a lot of work to do to set everything up before you can get to that position, if that makes sense. No, definitely. And like the thing is, because I never kind of felt having this folder, which like if a cop decides we're taking that off, you've rubbed them up the wrong way and they arrest people and everything. Even if you have, they'll go through every page, they'll find one little thing that's wrong. And because they have access to everything that you've got in a folder, or if it's broken into. So I think what you've just said makes way more sense. Yeah. And I think what we need to realise is that these

public agencies, these public authorities, officials and actors, they are playing a role, they are bound by their duty, they are bound by their regulations, they are programmed actors, they have mind controlled mind conditions, and they're going for a script. Now, if you're going to sit and go, I'm a living man, I'm not a citizen and all the rest of it. I really don't, they're not going to listen to you, they're not going to treat you because they don't recognise living men and women, they can only deal with dead fictional entities that are in their system. And they do not respect sovereign authority or immunity because they're acting under the presumption and assumption that they've already got jurisdiction over you. So to sit there pulling out all this paperwork, trying to argue the fact just puts you into complete conflict with these agencies and authorities. The best thing to do is go, yep, no problem. I'll accept everything that you're giving me. And I'll deal with this when I get back to my office. And I will respond to this officer in honour and in equity to settle the matter. Have a good day, sir. I'm off. And just curious, because under the UCC kind of it was like underprejudiced, UCC 1308, I believe it is, that you put in front of it. So it's kind of like a disclaimer than just signing it, because the way that they give you like, say, the fine or whatever it is that they've, you know, accosted you for, by you signing it, it's like you agree. So what's your thoughts on putting your autograph, as some people call it? Yeah, so we've got to a in society where they don't really need your signature anymore. So even if you don't sign, let's say you've got a penalty bill from a police officer, because you were speeding, even if you don't sign it, that bill still sticks. Because you are still registered in their citizen, and they still have authority and jurisdiction over you. And then of course, they've got all the proof and the evidence that you've done the speeding, and they just don't need your signature anymore. So that document that they're giving you, not only are they creating a trust, and they give you the document, because the moment they give you the document, they're handing over their property to you, their paper property, and they're making you a trustee in the matter with the legal title to settle the bill. And also they're forming a contract with you, because it's offering acceptance, right? So in law, in the law of rescission, you can actually cancel a contract within three days, if you've realised that the contract was a mistake. So of course, the contract is a mistake, because it's been formed between the the law enforcement agency and the citizen. And of course, the citizen, you've rescinded and cancelled your bonded surety position to the citizen. Therefore, you're no longer responsible or liable for the payment to the citizen. And you can actually write rescinded on the contract within three days and send it back to them and say, discharge that now, it's cancelled. But what we do is we discharge any bill or any claim by doing a process of acceptance for discharge. So the moment you do actually, by the way, you can write the word acceptance and sign a claim or bill. And the moment you do that, what you're doing is you're accepting performance and liability of the bill. But also when you sign it and date it, you actually endorse the claim or bill. And that means you throw the liability back over to them to settle the bill. And then when you send the bill back to them back in a private trust and appoint them as trustee, again, they have the legal title of trustee and they must settle it. So none of these things, what we're doing with a private trust, none of it's a problem. There's no conflict, there's no controversy. We're able to turn the dynamics, throw the liability back on them, but also able to send the bill back to them, endorsed and enlivened with our signature, where they can actually use the bill as a form of credit to discharge the debt that's on the bill, because all bills that are issued, and we're going to get into this in later podcasts, all bills that are issued in the system of commerce are bills of exchange. They are financial debt instruments and they must be backed by the equity, backed by the credit of the life and state of the person to whom the bill is charged to, or to the person or the living man who's the bond insurer for the bill. So the moment you accept and sign a bill, you're actually saying, yeah, I backed this with my credit from my estate, and then that public agency can actually use the credit that backs the bill to actually offset the debt. Yeah, because obviously that bill, the moment they issue it, becomes a liability on their books, becomes a debt on their books, and they can use the same instrument once it's been endorsed as a credit to offset the liability and discharge the debt. And we teach everybody how to do that inside our academy. But before you get to that stage, you have to go through the status correction process, you have to get all your documents in order, you have to do a proper lawful severance and separation from the citizen, and you have to put your life into the trust. So that if anything you're doing ever gets placed into, comes under question or placed into investigation, you have all the documents to back up what you've done as a lawful and equitable process. That brings us on to the declaration of status, Roy. Can I just kind of go back just one second? Come on, let's do it, let's go back. It's because, you know, we're talking about the driving and I know, like, even in Wales, I've heard of it in Wales, so it's probably in different parts of the UK, they were like 30 miles an hour speed limit, which is, you know, just, you know, a safe limit to stop and it's okay, change it to 20. They've done the exact same here in a load of places, 50 kilometres, which is the 30 miles per hour down to 40. And yeah, so,

you know, things like that, that doesn't really affect you. But then what I'm seeing is, you know, you've got people doing 80 and 90, but then they're kind of using this kind of, oh, I've got the protection, you've no control over me and stuff like that. I don't want that because it scares the shit out of me when I see somebody driving that speed, because the safety, and I know people kind of question that one. Yeah, this, I'm really glad you've pulled us up and brought this to light. So let's look at that. One thing that we 100% teach within our society and our organisation, sovereignty is not lawlessness. Okay? Sovereignty does not make you exempt from laws when laws are fair, laws are just, when laws create order and stability within a society, because we do need law and order. You cannot just have roads without rules of the road, because obviously the roads would descend into chaos, there would be a free for all collisions, you know, all the rest of it would go from that. So what we teach in our academy is that we are operating in law and equity. And one of the maxims of equity is he or she who seeks equity must perform in equity. That means if you want to get fairness in a situation, you too must act in fairness, you must act in honour of the laws. That means if you were doing 70 mile an hour down a 30 mile an hour zone, then you are, you know, you are acting dishonourably, you are violating rules that are there to keep everybody else safe. So you will just accept the fine and pay it. If, however, you were driving down the road, and you was, you know, two mile an hour above a 50 mile an hour speed limit, and then someone pulls you over, and they don't give you the leeway on it, they say I'm gonna put a ticket on that, then you could use the system of discharge to get that bill discharged, because it wasn't really fair. They didn't give you any leeway. So this is about being an example of law, this is about being your own justice and your own judge and your own jury, to weigh up the equity of the situation and to conduct yourself with conscionable action, you know, not to use these tools and these techniques of private trust and equity to gain unfair advantage over everybody else. That's one thing that we certainly don't promote. Again, law and equity is the forefront of everything that we do. Hopefully that answered your question. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Great. Are you ready to move on now? Yeah, yeah. Good. So that brings us to the third component, the declaration of status and what you're seeing on the left side there is my actual document declaration of status. And you're seeing a number of documents there, because this really is a comprehensive set of different documents that forms the declaration. So the document package itself is over 100 documents. And we issue this document to the leaders of the nation state, the leaders of the United Kingdom, to rescind and cancel citizenship and correct our status to be recognised as a living man or woman, sovereign authority and independence from the Crown Estate. All right, so this is a very powerful document. It's issued from your own sovereign free will, your own sovereign authority, with your own private law that says, hey, I am now declaring independence. I'm now exposing the forms of citizenship. I'm now coming forward as sovereign. And we're going to get into a really good document, by the way, in the next presentation slides. But the thing I do want to mention, which is very important, is that this document, again, it's not something that you can take on board within weeks. You really need to study this document over a period of months to really understand the laws that are in the document, the facts that are in the document, the proofs that are in the document that substantiates all the reasons why you can actually rescind and cancel citizenship and separate your life from the Crown Estate. And this document, this is a life changing document. Once you've completed this document, your perspective on reality will change. You will have undergone a personal transformation. That's how powerful this document is. And everything within this document actually does empower you, does actually empower your sovereign authority. So before I move on, I would like to get your initial views on this declaration of status. Well, I'm assuming every single thing that you do, you have to do registered post because they claim they didn't get it. Is that what you kind of advise people to do? We're going to get into that. Yeah. So registered post. And we also do a court mailing service, our own private court mailing service, because we issue documents from our own private venue and jurisdiction over to the public venue and jurisdiction, which means two different venues and jurisdictions are communicating. And we set up a court mailing service to demonstrate that we're a completely different venue and jurisdiction. So let's reveal this document to you and your audience. So here's a component of this declaration of status. So you've got the actual declaration and you've got a supporting brief in the declaration part of this document. What you're actually doing is you're substantiating how citizenship is a diminished status of legal bondage that actually deprives you from your true and inherent and natural freedoms and rights as a living man or woman. Because as we've discussed before, citizenship is where you bond your life to the civil system, the civil law and civil rights, which are freedoms and rights granted to you by the Crown Estate. So, you know, let's look at those very briefly. We've got the freedom of expression, the freedom of movement to be able to access the law system and various other different freedoms and rights. However, as we've all discovered, especially with the recent pandemic, those rights can be removed whenever the Crown Estate wants to remove those rights. And what was removed when we went through the pandemic? The freedom of

movement. He was unable to get on a plane and go abroad. They stopped it, didn't they? So if you think you've got freedoms and rights in this world, you haven't. You've got privileges, privileges that are granted to you by the Crown Estate. So this declaration is to inform the Crown Estate that we know the game's up, we know what this citizenship game's all about, and here's all the facts that substantiate that. In the declaration, we also express our sovereign free will to sever and separate our actual life, because that is our free will choice. And of course, if that's our free will choice, then the Crown Estate cannot intervene with our free will choice, or they cannot refuse our free will choice or prevent us from exercising our free will choice, because that's the definition of slavery, right? But they say, well, you can't do that. You must do it our way. That's slavery. And then we assert our status as living man or woman to determine, direct and govern our own life and the state of our own private law. And the supporting brief is the fact that we have to provide all the facts and all the proofs that back up our claim. We can't just say, hey, I don't want to be a citizen anymore and I want to be sovereign. We've got to really back it up with all the reasons why we can do that. And then this supporting supporting brief on a chronological process, we go through all the events in history, all the legislated laws and acts where the British Isles was conquered by various empires and crowns that enslaved the populace into Roman civil laws, that placed everyone into citizenship, and how legislated law by legislated law, they slowly began to bring everything into a centralised system of control and extortion that was in where the Crown Estate was imposing its will over the people. And that gets outlaid in that supporting brief document. So I would be interested to know whether you have had any experience or awareness of this declaration of status. Have you seen this anywhere before? I've heard of like E.B. Bacchus kind of talking about stuff as well on that. And the thing is, I know that when she was on my show, she was saying that the United States is still controlled under the UK, like it was still under British rule. So this kind of, I don't know whether they call it the tea, where they kicked out the British, by the way, and like that never happened. They still had control. And I saw something as well about Canada, that all the land was under the Crown. So when you look at it, like sometimes one thing that I hear a lot of is, irrespective of who's actually teaching things, everyone is kind of, yeah, but it doesn't work for me. It has to be a Commonwealth. It has to be this. This looks like it's an international thing. Everything is all, the whole thing is controlled. Even when we see all the wars, they're all part of it. All you do is the Antarctic Treaty. That should tell you straight away. Antarctic Treaty, all the big boys, they're all together. Nobody's allowed to come here. So that kind of, that even tells you that the whole lot is orchestrated. So based on most people's question, will this work? I think this works on every country. Absolutely. Yeah. So this document can be adapted and modified for any nation state in this world. It's just a simple case of just changing the name of the nation state, making a few adjustments to the actual laws that are stated in the document itself, 100%, because we are under a one world government. This isn't fantasy or fiction. This is reality. It's called the United Nations. Yeah. All the nations are part of one United Nations. And in that assembly, the General Assembly, they all get to vote on the proposals that are put forward, which are policies to govern the economics, to bring into place legislative laws for health, for finance, for banking, for the major stuff, for the major economic activity. And believe it or not, the United States of America is the top dog in United Nations because they have veto power on anything the General Assembly does. So, for example, if they are the General Assembly, which is all the representatives of all the nation states, if they are protesting, voting against the war in Palestine, guess who comes along and vetoes it? The United States. Because they have veto power. That means to tell you they are in control of the United Nations. Yeah. And if we look at the powerhouse of the one world government, we've obviously got the square mile in London, United Kingdom, which is obviously the financial district. We've got the Vatican because it all goes back to the Vatican, which is a country in itself as well that people don't realise. Well, they are. Yeah, they are, because they are the General Assembly of the United Nations. They are recognised as their own nation state and their own authority. And if you were to do a visa process online, you will find that if you are part of the Vatican, then you can get a passport as the Vatican, as your own nation state. So 100 percent. And of course, you've got the Washington, D.C., which is, again, another district of this crown empire and its financial system. So, yeah, 100 percent. It's all interconnected. It's all a one world system of structures that are there to control and extort the populace. So this will work in any nation state. Are you happy to move on? Yes, indeed. Good. So here's the second element of declaration of status. So what you're seeing on the left side of the screen here is five specific documents that create the severance and a separation from the citizen, the crown and the state. So the first document is where you rescind all signatures that you have ever placed on all contracts, trusts, bonds, registrations, licences, corporations and anything else that you've done with the public agency, the crown or state where you've made a commitment to any one aspect of your life and placed it into their venue and jurisdiction, placed it into legal bondage. And

what happens is once you rescind the signatures from these documents, that cancels all the registrations or the contracts or the trusts and takes them back to zero, back to where everybody's in their original positions before the contracts. So that's an important part of severing and separating our life where we do a signature rescission. The next thing that we have to do is to disclaim all trusts, because as we've discussed before, the citizen is a public trustee, is in a trustee relationship with all public agencies, and therefore the legal title holder of everything that the citizen thinks the citizen owns in the system, which is all public property, part of public trusts. And therefore, to sever and separate our life from that trusteeship position, we must disclaim all trusts, whether they are disclosed or undisclosed. The next step, of course, is severing our actual life from the tax system. So we need to rescind and cancel the actual tax registration, because when we become sovereign, when we become our true sovereign status and standing as a living man or woman, we are no longer operating in the venue and jurisdiction, the public domain, we are no longer a registered taxpayer, we are no longer going to be paying tax. That is for a UK citizen, that is for a legal person, that is for a slave to the system, unfortunately. And as a part of this severance and separation, we do a declaration of our sovereign name. I'm sure you're probably aware of this, Roy, the citizen is recognised in the system by the surname, and the surname is a surety name that represents the legal person in their system. And the surname actually doesn't belong to our family lineage, because it is a state created title that was created many, many, many centuries ago, and granted to our family lineage, as part of our registration into the system many, many, many centuries ago. So we need to do a declaration of our sovereign name to demonstrate and prove that our sovereign name, which is our first and middle names only, which is our true name that was gifted to us by our parents, as our sovereign name being separate to the surety name. So that, again, causes a severance and separation from the citizen. And then the final one is the royal denouncement, right? Because at the moment, as citizens in the United Kingdom, we have been declared by the Crown as subjects of the Crown. And subject means to be a servile, an inferior, a servant of the Crown. Okay, and this is something the Crown has declared. This is something that we haven't, you know, officially signed up for. But fortunately, through citizenship, it is presumed, it is assumed and is imposed onto the citizen. And so what we do is we exercise a royal denouncement to denounce the Crown. And we also substantiate all the reasons why the Crown is illegitimate, because all Crowns across the entire planet have taken the position of being proclaimed, being the Crown, which is a self-proclaimed position of any Crown, because they state that they have a divine right to rule as granted by God. So we are very diplomatic in this denouncement document in saying, okay, if you can prove to me that your God exists, and then prove to me that your God granted you the right to rule over my life, then I would accept your rulership. If you cannot prove that to me, then you do not have a right to rule over to me, and I denounce your position, your Crown. So again, that's a very important document, especially when it comes to any nation-state that are part of a Crown Commonwealth, where there is a sovereign Crown, there is a monarchy that's the head of the state. I'm really interested to get your perspective on this. Well, first of all, what about the birth certificate? Do you do anything there? Because that was the trickery of it as well. We're going to get into that in the next slide. Okay, I'm psychic, I'm just reading into this. No, no, I love the way you're explaining everything, because there's a lot of confusion out there, and as I had mentioned, I've read over 20 books, but there's also a lot of with different organisations, and sometimes you get into something thinking this is good, and then you see the trickery behind it, and that's my fear with a lot that's going on, because people, they go in and they listen to some of the people. I'm not going to say the names, because I don't even want people to research them, because they don't even deserve that somebody would go down that angle, but I know that they came across as if they were going to sort out everything, and it was all a lot of trickery and everything, and what annoys me is that people then, they feel burnt, and they just kind of stop, and they walk away when they just went into the wrong door, unfortunately. Yeah, I can relate to that, because I've personally experienced that on my own personal journey into sovereignty. There were many organisations that on the face of it were saying the right things, but when I got into the organisation, when I was invited to join them, and I got inside and took a look around, but I realised actually this is not exactly what you said it was, and then you're bringing into the fray all these different things that were never part of the original offering, and actually what you're presenting is now confusing, you're now in conflict with yourself, and it's not making any sense, and of course the hairs on the back of your neck go up, your spider senses tingle, don't you think there's something off here, there's something very off. So I personally had that experience, I had it with a private society that I joined over in America, when I got into that private society, and I started to act, because I was looking into things with a very sceptical eye, because I do it to myself, I am my own worst critic, I criticise absolutely everything that I do myself, and pull it to bits before I'm actually happy with what I'm doing, and can stand by it. So when I go into these organisations, I go with

a critical eye, and I exposed a lot of things in this particular organisation over in America that looked very promising to begin with, but then I discovered that they had actually incorporated their private sovereign organisation into their local state. So my question is, well if you're claiming to be sovereign and independent, you've got this incorporation certificate, you know, explain that. So yeah, I totally relate to that, and it can be very demoralising, very disheartening, if that's happened to you on more than one occasion, it can cause you to back away and think actually this is nothing, this is a lost cause, there's nothing here. And I'm different in that respect, because it spurred me on, it made me realise that actually maybe I'm in the position of being able to see these things, because I'm the one that's going to come along and perhaps correct things, and simplify things, and get to the facts and the truth. Because my motto is, as long as you're standing in pure truth, with verifiable facts, and you're taking right action, then you're always going to be in a good position in life. And of simple facts and the simple truth, it really is pure and simple, and it really is self-evident, and people can resonate with it. And, you know, when you start confusing things and making things very complicated, you're typically doing it because you're trying to muddy up the waters, and you might distort things so that things aren't so obvious in what you're doing. That's my take on it. Excellent, and because we touched on the passport, and I know that there's another organisation, they were doing the diplomatic passports, and I know that people were paying a lot of money, and then they were like, some people were saying, hey, it's working, and others weren't. I mean, I kind of thought, this is strange anyway, but one thing that I saw is the people with the diplomatic passports still had to get jabbed, and I thought, well, that doesn't save you much, does it? And I think we've touched on it a few times, there's people kind of saying, get this, come into our private members association and all that, and they're charging big bucks. And the problem is, unfortunately, when people search for this, they've been wiped out, and that's the kind of, you know, we've both been, you know, we've both fucking get slapped, and that's why we probably started searching this out to go, how did that happen? And the thing is, you know, there's people then bringing them in, and then they're trying to get them to go away and lose credit and stuff, as if it's going to save them, and it's all trickery, and then they're just going to wash their hands and move on to the next victim. Absolutely, and I think because this whole sovereignty movement, this whole sovereignty thing is unprecedented, and we are the pioneers, and we are on the front line, and we are, not only are we perfecting what we already know, but we're also creating new solutions, new remedies, and it's continually developing, evolving, as life is changing, all the rest of it. Then I come to the conclusion that if anyone comes on board in our organisation, that they really need to spend a certain amount of time within our organisation before they make any financial commitments. They really need to come for a trial period first to study what we're doing, to get familiar with what we're doing, to question and challenge everything that we're doing, so they can get clear and certain in their mind what we're all about before they make that financial commitment, and also we set up our, because we're a charitable missionary organisation, we're not registered, we're private and independent and sovereign, and we work on a donation-based scheme, and we make it very clear to our new members, listen, you can get on board with us, do the free trial first, we'll start with monthly donation basis, and then after week six, if you decide that you've got to a certain point that you want to pull out because you've discovered something that you're not happy with, or you don't like, or you just don't want to go any further, we'll refund the donation back to you, and then we'll go back to our original positions. So we're being very fair and very equitable every step of the way, because it is such an important thing, and such a new thing, and of course people are very, very sceptical, because we're living in a world of hypervigilance and paranoia, because of what's going on in this world. And because you talked about the tax, and I know that's possible, but the thing is, sometimes people then want to set up their business, and then it's, do you set up the business as the individual, or do you do it as an entity, and then all of the banks and all of the companies, everything you go through, it's they want all this information, your tax information, your tax ID card, how do you navigate that? That's a really good question. So when you become independent from the Crown Estate and sovereign, you go for the status correction, you then create a private estate, okay, so you create a new private estate in a private domain, which is not registered, not licenced, or not incorporated in the Crown Estate, it's completely private and confidential, and it becomes a multi-layered, multi-jurisdictional private estate. This means that you can create unique lawful entities in the private, to own and hold assets and interests in the private. Of course, at the moment, everyone's got their life and their estate built in the public, right, under the name of the citizen. And of course, if you want to earn money in this world, you have no other choice but to go into the system of commerce, go into the system of corporations to earn money. Now, in the system, the public domain, the only way you can get access to the system is through a legal title, is through a legal person or a legal entity. Yeah, you cannot access the system as a living man or woman, you just can't do it. They will only

allow you to register something or register with a public agency, as long as you can provide identification that you're the UK citizen. Of course, that's how they keep you bound to the system. But of course, once you've done a status correction, once you've claimed your estate, and you've taken equitable interests, and you've secured them all into a private estate, what you can do is you can still have a corporation in the public. But what you do is you place that corporation into a private holding trust, whereby the corporation is now held and managed by trustees in a private holding trust, and where you can now start to transfer the shares of the business over into this private holding trust. But you still need to pay corporation tax in a public because you are still functioning as a corporation in the public. Okay, it says that it's all done for a private holding trust where you personally are no longer liable. The private holding trust is now holding all the legal liability and all the financial obligations contained in a private trust. That's how we do it. Because we've recognised that whilst we're in two minds, okay, we've got a public thing going on over here. That's where our life is all built. That's where we're making all the money and the wealth. And the other part of mine is right, I'm now going into the private, I'm now going to build this private life and private estate. And I'm going to join this private society where we build new systems and new structures. That's something that's happening on that side. So I'm now living in a juxtaposition. I've got these two things going on. How do I keep them separate? And how do I transfer the equity rights that I've got in the public over to the private and still at the same time, settle any obligations or liabilities in public? Because if you have got a corporation, even though it's still in a private holding trust, you've still got to settle the obligations of that corporation. But what we're aiming for right in the future is we're aiming to private enterprise in our own private society where we no longer have to do corporations in public. But that takes a critical mass. We need a certain number of members in our society that's getting up to 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 people where we can actually start to do private enterprise within our own private society without needing to go and set up a corporation in the public. That's a huge process that's going to take time and transition. And just want to save you and your people. Estonian e-residency does zero corporation tax, and I'm sure that your private entity then can actually invoice for the stuff. So instead of taking it as a dividend, because there can be double taxation agreements. So like in Poland, you pay 20% down a dividend and there's double taxation agreements. So that's the max you pay, but you can actually invoice yourself as well from the thing for services that were created. So there's ways with no corporation tax as well. When you

know how to do bookkeeping and you know how to lawfully avoid tax, there are ways to, to minimise tax 100%. So for example, let's look at a corporation, a corporation in the UK, I think donate up to 50% of its profits. Yes, that's gross profits. So if you've got a corporation that's making gross profits, and of course, you know, you're going to get at least 20%, isn't it corporation tax at the end of the year, it might have gone up too short. It does, doesn't it? But you can donate 50% of that to your new private estate that's set up in a private as a missionary charity organisation. That's 50% right there and gone done with. But also as a living man or woman, once you've done a status correction, and once you've claimed the equity of your estate secured, you can actually claim rather than take drawings from a business as a citizen as an income, you can actually take draw money out of the business in an equitable nature. So you're claiming as equity, and then you're placing that into a private equity trust. And then you're also going to claim the shares of the business and put that into a private trust, and where you can actually sell those shares to the private estate that you've created. And in exchange for it, you can get a private life annuity contract that provides you a tax free income from life. So there are many different ways that you can lawfully avoid tax. And we do go through the various different options that are available when setting up this private structure to live in a private. So yeah, good point that you just raised there. Now we move on to the next slide. Now this goes back to what you just mentioned earlier about the citizenship, the birth certificate, how do we deal with the birth certificate. So as part of a status correction, and as a part of reclaiming back the equity and rights of our life to hold as a living man or woman in a private domain, we're going to create what's known as a private estate trust. Because at the moment, as we've discussed before, everything that you think you own in the public domain you don't own, but instead, it's all in public trusts, which means it's all public property, which is all part of the Crown Commonwealth, which is all governed by HM Treasury. And you are in a position of trusteeship as the citizen as the legal title holder, with only a legal right to hold, use, profit, transfer the property. As part of your journey into sovereignty, what you're going to do in accordance with the law of equities, you're now going to come forward as a living man or woman go right, okay, I've just realised the fraud and deception of this citizenship, I'm now coming forward in my true status and standing as a living man or woman, and now I want to exercise a paramount claim to claim the equity and rights of everything that I have created in the name of the citizen in the public domain. And I'm now going to take the equity, we call it your equitable interest, and I'm now going to place it into a private estate trust that I've created in private. And what that does is that effectively dissolves all the public trusts and secure the equity that you've got vested in the citizen over into a private estate trust. And we do that for several important reasons, I'm going to get into that in future podcasts. That involves Roy, us claiming the birth certificate, because the birth certificate is actually a certificated bond that represents the value of your life and estate as contained and administrated by HM Treasury, Treasury and a public trust arrangement. So the actual birth certificate actually represents the value of your life and estate in that system. Now, when we come forward after a status correction and our true status as a living man, we can actually claim the birth certificate as a deed and gift in equity, and that we place the birth certificate into our new private estate trust. And the moment we place the birth certificate into our new private estate trust, where that birth certificate is a bond that represents the equity of our life and estate, as captured by HM Treasury, that equity, that value is now private property of our private estate trust as represented by the birth certificate. And because we're doing that, doing it in law, doing it lawfully, doing it honourably, doing it in equity, which provides the remedy and solution to correct the injustices and fraud of citizenship, we need to do the honourable thing. And we need to notify the Crown Estate that we've created the private estate trust, we need to notify the Crown Estate that we've claimed the birth certificate, we need to inform them that we've done it, but we also need to give them the reasons, the lawful basis, the reasonable cause that allows us to claim the birth certificate. And that all gets expressed in these documents here, which is the trust and the notice of deed. We're informing the Crown Estate that, hey, I've come back, I've corrected my status, I'm the living man or woman, I'm not the legal citizen, I'm now claiming the birth certificate, because I know it's a bond that represents the value of my life and estate, but I'm the true owner of it, because I'm the true creator of it. I'm now placing it in a private estate trust, where I privately control the equity of my estate, which means all the trusts that you've created are now invalid, criminal and illegal. And I'm just informing you that I've done this with these documents here. And here's my autograph, here's my fingerprint seal for authenticated documents. I was trained to do this through a system that I had found, and it was getting my mother to claim the documentation of the born certificate, it's not called a birth certificate, and they didn't even respond, they've tried it twice. And then they've heard as well, that you have to go to the Vatican to get your stuff. So is it just the government institute in your country that you're living in, or where is it that you're supposed to get this? Okay, so that's an

important question. Who is the supreme authority that decides over these matters? Well, if we look at each crown commonwealth, whether that be Canada, let's say, for example, or Australia, for example, or the crown commonwealths in Africa or across Europe, these are all part of the same crown empire, and the same crown empire that's governed by the Vatican, the Holy See, the Holy Roman Empire. They're all crown franchises. Yeah, they're all part of the same system, the same structure. But the fact that we're dealing with the crown of the United Kingdom, we are actually dealing with a subdivision of the Vatican, right, of the Holy Roman Empire. And we also do this perform in accordance with the law of maxims of equity, and there's a maxim of equity, which says this, equity looks at the substance rather than the form. So what that basically means is equity is looking at your intention, rather than the form that you put that intention in. So even if you are formally notifying the crown estate in your country, your intention behind it is to sever and separate your actual life from the system. So equity says, even if you didn't get the form quite right, even if it wasn't a perfected form, or if it didn't go to the right person, equity saying, well, your intention was to sever and separate your life from the system. Therefore, that is placed before the form you put a matter in. Does that make sense? Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Because equity is all about providing justice to correct the strict letter of the law. So equity, equity looks at the conscious aspect of the act, looks at the spiritual, the soul aspect of the act, looks at what's what's right and what's wrong about your act. And therefore, it would choose of your actions over the form that you put your actions in. And therefore, there's any legal formalities or legal technicalities that would turn around and say, well, actually, the law says this, you should have done it this and you should have done it with that equity says, well, actually, we're coming in to provide justice that provides remedy against the strict length of the law to look at what's actually truly right and what's actually truly wrong. That's the beauty of equity. It's the law of laws. It's the justice to provide justice where there's been injustices with law. So again, equity looks at the substance rather than form, looks at the intent of the matter, the intent behind the matter, rather than the form you put it in. And that allows us to not get bogged into all of the complications and all of the unknowns and all of it. Could it be this? Could it be that? We've exercised our free will. We've stated that I don't want to be a part of this crown empire anymore. And that's it. Equity backs that up and supports it. So let's get on to the final components of this declaration of status. And there's four components here. And this is all about the restoration and repositioning of your life in relation to the state. So the restoration aspect of a

declaration of status is that you're requesting that your actual life is released from being a bonded surety to the citizen, because you know that the Crown and the state have placed you into a surety ship relationship to the citizen. So you are now requesting, listen, I know that I've been placed into a bonded surety of every contract and every trust, disclosed and undisclosed. And I'm now requesting that you release my life from this system. Of course, this is my free will. This is my intent. I'm doing it in law of equity. And so it shall be. My will shall be done. Then we are giving notice to the Crown and state that our life, our actual life as a living man woman is now restored back to, and please excuse the typo errors in this presentation. I know there are a few, but it's restored back to our original and true status of being a living being of existing in life, and therefore no longer participating in the fictional world of the corporations or the legal titles and persons. And this next bit is really important. As part of the restoration and repositioning, we issue a writ known as the writ of habeas corpus. This is a sacred court writ that gets issued from our private court and gets issued over to the authorities of another society to say, hey, this human, this living man or woman is now belonging to our society. And therefore, should you detain the member of our society unlawfully, should you place the member of our society into custody, where you claim under false assumption and false accusation that they are a citizen that's under your venue and jurisdiction, we are demanding that you release our member on the basis that it's a false claim, because they are no longer a member of your society. And that's a very powerful document that gets issued from one society to another society, a very powerful document that these authorities know very, very well. So that gets issued to protect the lives of our members as part of the restoration and repositioning. And then the next important part is the declaration of peace, right? Because what we've got to realise is that this system is a hostile system. It is an aggressive system that is ruled over by force and law enforcement. And any perceived threats to the system, whether that be a challenge to the authority of the system, or an attempt to disrupt the system, the system itself is going to treat you as an enemy, as an enemy of the state. Of course, when they go down that path of treating you as an enemy of the state, then they can detain you, then they place you into custody, then they can deprive you from your property, from your money, from your life, from your estate, and all your horrible things they do to someone that they suspect is an enemy of the state. So we must be very clear when we're doing our status correction that, hey, I'm not here to challenge you guys. I'm not here to overthrow you guys. I'm actually making a declaration of peace. And I'm letting you know that I'm going to travel through your public domain under the International Flag of Peace, okay, because I'm now declaring myself as an individual that stands for peace. I'm a non-combatant, a non-enemy. I stand for peace and I operate in peace, at peace, with your crown and state. And the International Flag of Peace, Roy, has a doctrine of safe harbour, safe hospitality and safe passage. What that basically means, if you are going through the nation state of a particular ruler or authority of a crown estate, then if you are waving the flag of peace, then they have a doctrine that they will give you safe passage through their land, that they will offer you hospitality, they will make sure that you are safe. So that's a very important aspect of our declaration of status. We are repositioning ourselves to be a non-combatant, non-enemy, that we are operating under the International Flag of Peace and we're declaring ourselves to be at peace with the crown estate. I'm really interested to get your views on everything I've just stated on this slide. Well, I mean, I've heard of the habeas corpus, like it wasn't on the top of my tongue, but I remember going through that. But one of the things that I'm curious with the bonded, because it's like with the properties, they batch them all together and then it's traded around the place. Is that why it's taking time to actually get away from that? Because they have to remove it from one of the batches or how was it done? Yeah, so yeah, you're talking about packaging up mortgages, yeah, finance contracts. Yeah, but I heard, you know, the way that they do this is the same, whether that's true or not. Yeah, but it's a zero-sum game, isn't it? Because the system always balances itself out. So let's look at the mortgage contracts, for example. The mortgage contracts, they are financial detriments, right? So their bills are exchanged and they're securitised. And every mortgage contract that a citizen signs, they securitise that mortgage contract with the credit and creditworthiness of their life and and the mortgage contract can be backed by, of course, the property of the asset that underwrites the mortgage contract. And it can also be backed by the credit of the future labour of the citizen, right? All these things back the contract. And because it's a securitised instrument, it can be traded on the finance market. And that's how they can batch them all up. Yeah, put them together and then sell them on to the next finance company and make money from it. And the fact that they can do that. Does that cause any problems or complications or delays when it comes to us doing our decisions and our cancellations? The answer is no, because what we're doing has no bearing on what they're doing, and it doesn't stop or prevent them from doing what they're doing. So what we're basically doing is we're coming forward and saying, right, we're now claiming the equity of our estate. So the real estate property that we've got, we know is in a public

trust. And when there's a mortgage commitment to it, we're claiming the equity that we've got, the value that we've got, and we're placing the equity into a private trust. And that doesn't interfere with or go against any contracts that they're doing in a public domain that we can't stop because it's a huge machine and the cog's going to keep going and turning and turning and turning. But what we can do is we can securitise the equity that we have in the private trusts. So that's what I would say on that particular subject. Unfortunately, everybody that's operating in the public domain is bonded to this banking monetary system that operates in these financial instruments. And even though we're doing the good work to separate our life, separate our equity and rights from the system, the system's going to keep moving forward. It's operation, mode operation, it's mode, it's mechanics, all the rest of it, regardless of what we do over on this side. But that doesn't invalidate what we're doing. And of course, that does mean that what they're doing is criminal, is illegal. It's said that they just haven't realised it and they don't care and they're going to continue forth anyway. You know, it really is a very dishonourable and corrupt system, unfortunately. And of course, we're all awake to that. Are you okay to move on to the next slide? Yes, I do. Good. So let's talk about the declaration of status being issued to the Crown Estate. So this document, we're creating it, and we're issuing it to the Crown Estate, and it gets issued to the high office holders of the United Kingdom. So that would be, for example, the Prime Minister, right? So the Prime Minister governs the Cabinet of Ministers of the UK government, it gets issued to him, it gets issued to the Secretary of State, it gets issued to the Foreign Secretary, the Chancellor of Exchequer. It also gets issued to the Secretary of HM Treasury. And we don't exclude the Church from this either. So it'll get issued to the Archbishop of Canterbury for the English Church, which is part of the Vatican. And there are various other high office holders in position. So that would be, you know, the Minister of the Court Systems, it will get issued to that. It will also get issued to the Crown as the Head of States, it will go to the Office of the Monarchy, which of course is King Charles, because King Charles is the Head of State, so he needs to be notified of the declaration of status. So the whole package of documents is going to get issued to the high office holders. And before we issue it to the high office holders, we need to get the document authenticated. We need to get it authenticated and adjudicated as a fact of law, and we do it in the private public. So we've set up our own private court, where we can do a recognition and record of all the declarations of status that our members issue and create. So we can stamp it of our own court and say, right, yes, we stand as witness that you as the living man

have created this declaration of status in private. And then what we also do is we want to get it recognised in the public. So we have the document notarised, and we have it legalised in the public. So notarised and legalised in the public basically means that we get it recognised and accepted in the public. So let's look at the notarisation aspect of it. We take the document to a public notary. A public notary is a state agent that's been authorised to authenticate any documents in the public domain. So we take the declaration of status and we autograph it in the presence of a public notary. The public notary acts as a public witness to say that, yeah, that person did create that document in front of me, therefore it is authentic and it's original. We then get it legalised at the United Kingdom Legalisation Office. There's a place called the United Kingdom Legalisation Office and where they will actually stamp documents to say that, yeah, we will approve this document, authenticate this document has been witnessed by the public notary where it gets state approval. And what these two things basically mean is once the officeholder, let's say the Prime Minister, for example, receives the document, the Prime Minister must automatically accept the document as being original and authenticated because it has the notary stamp and it has the stamp from the UK Legalisation Office. All right, so these are the important processes of getting the document authenticated and issued to the Crown Estate. I'll be interested to get your views on that, Brian. Is there a difference, because I've heard this from someone else, that they were saying a notary public and a public notary, that they're different and you should use one and not the other? As long as the public notary has been certified by the Crown Estate, then you're okay. As long as the public notary can provide you that certification to say that the state has approved that notary. Because what the state is basically saying with the certification is they are witnessing documents for and on behalf of the state. All right, so that certificate is very important. So there we go, so that's the declaration of status, that's how we issue it to the Crown Estate. We make sure the document is authenticated, is witnessed and it can therefore not be rejected. And then we get to the adjudication process. How do we get this adjudicated as a fact of law? How do we get this finalised so that the document is a true testament of the fact that we have rescinded citizenship and asserted sovereignty? So we begin with the meaning of adjudication. The meaning of adjudication is this, it's the process of determining the facts of a matter and applying a final decision to conclude the matter as a final judgement. So how do we get this, our declaration of status concluded as a final judgement and as a fact of law? It happens through an administration process and we either get a non-response or we get an improper response. So let's look at the non-response first, Roy. A non-response is this, we've created the declaration of status, we've got it notarised, we've got it recognised in the public, we've got it recorded in the private, we send it by registered post, which of course records the mailing and it gets delivered to the office, it's recorded as being delivered to the office that's held by the Prime Minister and then we get no response. There's no recognition, there's no response, no letter coming back to say yeah we've just received this, we've just accepted it, thank you very much, we recognise your sovereignty. Instead what happens is there's no response and in accordance with the administrative law, a lack of response, a non-response is where the respondent or the recipient to which the claim declaration or notice was issued has acted with dishonour, therefore they've acted in full and because they haven't responded they, according to administrative law, there's a silent acquiescence, there's a silent acceptance and approval of the document. Now me personally, I think that's wrong. I don't agree with that personally. I think if someone doesn't respond they just haven't stated their position. How can you turn around and say well you've now accepted that when they haven't responded to it? I personally think that's wrong but that's the way that this system has been set up. So we're going to use that system against them if you like. We'll say well this is your law so okay we'll do it to your administrative process. So a non-response is good and also in the law of equity there is a maximum of equity that protects us from a non-response. It's that equity says if something is performed in equity and if there is a failure to perform in equity, equity still sees it as done. That means if you have come forward in equity to correct your status and the other side haven't performed, they haven't responded or haven't gone through some sort of process to recognise and accept your declaration of status, then equity sees it's done anyway because it ought to have been done. So that protects us and then the other part of the way that we get adjudication, how we get a final judgement to conclude the matter is the improper response. So let's say you've issued your declaration of status and then you get a let back from the office of the prime minister but the office of prime minister has failed to address or rebut statements within your declaration with verifiable facts that disproves your claim and disproves your right to perform a status correction and of course they can't disclaim your right, they can't disprove your claim because everything you've stated in your declaration is factual, it's truthful, it's lawful, it's honourable and it's been executed in equity and you've substantiated all the facts and proofs as to why you can in citizenship, why you can cancel citizenship and declare a sovereign status and independence from the crown estate. So an improper response is good because

if they fail to do it, again the equity comes back to provide justice where there's been injustice and that's how we get it adjudicated, that's how we settle the matter and conclude the matter as a fact of law on our side. It doesn't matter if they don't respond, it doesn't matter if they do an improper response, once we've expressed that declaration of status it stands as a fact of law. What are your thoughts on that Rowan? Well I know that in Poland that when you're getting a letter from say the city or the government or whatever, if they send you two registered letters and you don't collect them it's classed that you've got them and so they make a ruling based on that that you've got it. Just curious when you're writing to them, do you give them a timeline when to respond because usually when you're getting stuff from government and everything it's like oh you have to respond within seven days, I've even had things where it says three days for some stuff. Do you put a timeline on these when you're sending them? Absolutely, we give them up to three weeks maximum okay to come back and respond to the declaration of status and again their failure to respond or their failure to give a proper response means that after that three week period of the administrative process that's it, it stands as a fact of law. So you don't send reminders you just do the one with that and then take it as that? Absolutely 100 percent because this is more of a declaration than it is a claim. With a claim it's different, so with a claim we would go through a three-step administrative process where we would issue them a fault, give them an opportunity to cure the fault, issue them a second fault, give them an opportunity to cure it again and then we'll go with the third which is a default. With a declaration we don't need to go through that process because we're actually just declaring the facts, we're actually exercising our sovereign free will, we're saying look if you don't respond back in three weeks or come back with a proper response to disclaim what we've done then it's settled, it's a fact of law. Okay, excellent. Yeah and again that's and you know it's all about stepping into your sovereign authority and exercising your sovereign authority and of course to do that you need to have the internal aspect first right, you need to wake up and realise that hey I am the sovereign authority over my own life and I can assert my position in this world, I can express my will and I can change my status and change how I'm going to interact with this nation state going forward. And that Roy brings us to the sovereign court record. So within our own sovereign organisation we have our own court called the Grace Private Court and once someone's been through this declaration of status process we give them a final court record that can be used in future to dismiss and nullify any claims that are made in the future by any public agency against the status of the sovereign. So once someone's done this declaration of status if a public agency turns around and starts saying well you're the citizen and you're under our authority jurisdiction and we can place this claim over your life we would then have this document that we could issue if we want to issue it to disclose the information saying hey actually we are no longer the citizen, I've done a declaration of status, I'm no longer legally bonded to this, you have no venue and jurisdiction over my life estate. And with this Grace Private Court then if there is a court is there claims where there is cases that you're doing or is it just more kind of in the paper that's stating that? Yeah so with the documented procedures that we're doing that's all done through a court record. So yeah let's look at this, we've got two aspects of this, we've got court records and we've got court claims and court cases right that we can deal with in our court. So the court record is where someone within our society creates a sovereign document and then they have it recorded in our court and actually what they do is they come into a court setting where we do online court setting because we're a worldwide community so we're non-local it's a virtual court and in that court setting a sovereign will come forward and they will testify to the fact that they've created this document they can bring forth a witness with them and then the judge will be the witness to affirm that they've created the document and once that video recording is done that video recording then actually stands as witness to anyone that watches the video recording. Then we've got the aspects of the claims and the cases so if a public claim has been made over the life of one of our members then what we would do is first of all contain that public claim into a private trust matter and where we can assist our member to deal with it that way in law and ethics it doesn't have to go into a court because we always want to solve and settle matters outside of court and then we get to a situation then if we are not getting the proper response from a claimant in the public then one of our sovereign members can bring it forward as a claim in our private court and then what happens we start interacting with the public courts because we're interacting between two different venue jurisdictions but the main aim or the main instruments and the main procedure that we have is to secure everything into private court trusts where we can throw the liability back over to the public claimants rather than it gets to a situation where one of our members ends up in a public court. So our private court does stand to serve and function and to protect the matters of our private members and of course to help them defend their life in the state against any claims that arise from any public authorities in the public where everything that we're doing is done as a documented procedure which means our private court can issue court instruments so whether that's a

court writ, court notice, a court injunction, a court order that we send over to these public jurisdictions and the most powerful instruments that we have are these sacred court writs because we're operating as a charitable and a missionary organisation our court actually has a higher jurisdiction over these public courts that are operating as secular courts which means they have an inferior venue jurisdiction which means when we issue a sacred writ like the habeas corpus for example to another court to say hey you can't process the member of our society in your secular court because they belong to our private society in our private court which is a missionary organisation that stands on the highest laws of the land. So again everything we're doing here is taking a position of higher authority over the matters of our own society in our own private members and again what we're doing here is unprecedented Roy, this is stuff that we are continually developing and refining as we're going along because nobody's doing this or very few people are doing it and what our private court actually does is it actually honours sovereign authority that means any one of our private members that comes into our private court they have complete sovereign authority over the matters of their own life and state and they bring forward their own claims and cases and they adjudicate their own claims and cases with the guidance and support of our judges which means our court although it can issue decisions and rulings our sovereign members have the sovereign free will and authority to accept or reject our court's decisions and rulings. So again everything is done lawfully and in equity to respect everybody's authority and I think I've said enough on that particular subject. Has there been because I know this you know just there's so many levels to this and you're learning as you said have you had situations where you've actually dealt with the other court and said hey no we're over you by the you can't take him to your court? Yeah so far we haven't been in that situation ourselves in our society because I think I mentioned this before we've just started out we are a young society we're in our infancy we're under 100 members the members that are currently in our society are going through our sovereignty academy which is a two-year process and it's currently in the process of structuring restructuring all their life into private trusts and we're teaching them how to settle any claims or any charges or any debts by settling them through private trust. So yes we've had results and outcomes by settling matters through private trust but we have not yet got to a situation where we've had to deal directly with a public court to settle a public court matter should it get to that situation but we 100% have done the homework we've acquired the knowledge we've learned the procedures we have all the instruments we've done all the preparation work and we're ready should we get to that situation in the future so that's me just being honest and upfront with you. I love that and just in case someone is sceptical because of all the crap that I went through I was calling to court and with my knowledge I got them to back off and I didn't have to go into court so I actually from what you've said and how it's going to operate I believe that that's the way that it will be and that's the way it should be and yeah. Yeah so these public courts let's look at these public court public court system for example United Kingdom so the public court system basically if you step into a court or if you go through a legal procedure or fill out a legal form you have automatically placed the matter under their jurisdiction so we under no circumstances as sovereigns ever want to go into a public court because they are automatically assumed jurisdiction and we never want to do anything for a legal procedure so we do everything through private court trusts and settle the matter that way. There is a process in the sovereignty movement where you can go into a court appearance and claim a special appearance which means rather than it being a general appearance where you just go in and accept that you're under the jurisdictional authority of the court you claim you're here on special appearance which means you're there to challenge the jurisdiction of the court but the common misconception in the sovereignty movement is once you go in and say I'm under special appearance you're no longer in their jurisdictional control and that's that's completely wrong you're there just challenging whether they do have jurisdiction over you and the court will decide whether they have jurisdiction over you or not so we again have recognised that just stepping one foot into a public court is a problem for us as a sovereign because they will not accept sovereign authority or sovereign immunity in a public court but you can as a citizen if you know how the court system works and if you are acting in honour and you haven't actually caused any problems and the claims are false you can get a court situation discharged quite easily you know you can walk out of a court so yeah it all comes about it all comes down to who has the authority who has the venue jurisdiction and who doesn't and the whole point of us creating our private society and our own private court is that we have developed our own venue jurisdiction and our own court to deal with any matters so we are effectively and practically standing up as our own nation state it's just that we haven't actually formally come out in the public and made a declaration of independence but that would take us getting that's down the few that's down the road in the future when we've got to a critical mass of say ten thousand fifty thousand or a hundred thousand people now we can step out and say right we're declaring independence of the united kingdom now you must recognise us because we're at such a critical mass now we're in a

position of coming to the table and and the negotiating table now we're in the position of forming treaties with you now we're in position of getting certain exemptions or immunity from this now they must recognise and accept what we're doing but at the moment in our infancy as we're establishing everything as we're developing and refining things we're navigating our way through this and out of the system and everyone that comes on board will see that. I know this isn't the type of thing that you want to hear but just have you set it up in such a way that if the number 10 bus hits you in the morning that this will continue? Absolutely 100 percent everything with this organisation has been set up so that there are successes there are people that can step in and take control of this information I've even set up a grace copyright of the private intellectual properties that is protected by our society but yeah this whole thing has been structured up so that it will continue in perpetuity because the everything that we're doing here with the information the lawful procedures I know that this is how we're going to unwind from the system and how we're going to evolve as a human civilisation and also a thing that I want to add is that we're not the only ones doing this there are other organisations that are on this same journey and I think what's going to happen is we're going to converge at some point down the line and we're all going to come together we're all going to unify and that's how we're going to grow and that's how we're going proliferate throughout society so it's as it as with everything it's a numbers game and it's going to take time and what you said I think and it's something that I would hope because of the people that I've kind of have on more than once and realise okay I love what you're doing I see what you're doing I see how you're helping people there's been about four that are including yourself that you're doing different things different ways and I think combining forces would 100x this whereas there's a lot of the other ones you keep them out of the you keep your bubble of the good guys and that's how I think you reach the masses because yeah there's a lot of people and what I'm seeing is everybody's got some secret sauce they're all doing different things I love the way that you're actually doing it and how you're explaining it and everything because it can be complex but the way that you're doing it and what I love is others when they're kind of saying things they're making it look like you just do this and it's done and everything and you're saying because that was my experience that it took a few years and at the start that was a bit frustrating because I thought the different things I was doing it takes longer but once you've got somebody holding your lap you know holding your hand here this is the template and you're not just winging it there's a lot to be said about that so yeah yeah 100% and thank you very much for acknowledging that and and bringing it up to the forefront because again this is no mean feat this is not for the faint-hearted you have to have got to a certain level of state of consciousness and awareness of what's going on the world this you've truly got to be motivated to do this and there's got to be a sense of calling within you that's saying this is the right thing for me to do and it really is the select few that are being called to do this and you know the work that we're doing so I am right at the forefront of everything that we're doing in our organisations so anyone that comes into our organisations new member joins our academy and starts going through all this coursework to learn the procedures learn the knowledge and all the rest of it I take them on weekly mentorship sessions so they join me once a week we go live and then we start looking at the work that we're doing and I answer all their questions I ask they come forth you know study the work challenge the work question it query let's get it all out in the open let's get this and bring your perspective and bring your experiences and let's develop and refine this together so yeah it's it's happening boy it's moving forward and we're at the forefront of this I think I might have one more slide I'm not too sure oh yeah good to end this presentation Roy could you please read this final slide what can you do master sovereignty to restore and protect the freedoms and rights of your life from a corrupt system of control and extortion I think that's a nice way to end it well I suppose we can tell them where they can find you but just because one of the things that was frustrating me was like a lot of the solicitors which is all the whole system when you go into it you realise even the person is supposed to be on your side is getting a kickback and it's all everything is like you're the idiot and that's why you've got somebody representing you but I had a criminal case taken against me here in Poland and I had the top kind of solicitor in the city he had represented me on a few cases he's an advocate which is like the top and his daughter was dealing with me for the criminal case and when I was talking to him I was in his house I don't know what I was saying and I started telling him about my knowledge and everything this is a guy you know that's teaching all the solicitors he didn't go right you're an idiot shut up or that's not he just kind of listened away I knew he knew I know what I was saying and he just done that and he goes yeah better not say that he didn't say I was wrong or anything and I knew just from that I was like I'm I'm onto something here like but that's what he was saying better not say that and the only reason that I didn't go down that route is because it was a criminal case and it was out of my depth and I just didn't know what to do thankfully won it but yeah but listen I thoroughly enjoyed every bit of this I look forward to part three four five six seven and ten and even going further because this is evolving so much you might let the listeners know where they could find you absolutely yeah 100 percent so if anyone's curious and interest is now more about sovereignty or learn more about our organisation then they can just simply go to our website which is www.graceprivatesociety.com and there you'll have some some home pages and there's you'll have some information about what we're doing as an organisation and also how you can get involved in our academy and we also offer a free 10-week trial so you know we we invite you to step in to our academy to have a look at the coursework see what we're doing join us for some mentorship sessions get a taste of what we're doing get a feel what we're doing question and clarify it and then you will be fully informed to know as to whether or not sovereignty is the right move for you so there you have it make sure I put the in the video thank you very much Russell thank you take care so that's all for the speaking podcast or not the speaking the awakening and this album I have so many podcasts I get muddled up you find all my shows on scan the qr code or go to roycoughlan.com and if you're looking for virtual assistance they're the things that keep the lights on go to va.world until next week take care