TRANSKRIPTIO 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.559
In this year's midterms, the stakes stretch well beyond who wins and who loses.
00:00:04.799 --> 00:00:17.039
It involves control of Congress, both houses, the future of President Trump's agenda, and the first look at where the country may be headed in 2028 when Americans elect the next president.
00:00:17.280 --> 00:00:19.760
So, what races should we focus on?
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:23.600
And what's the message voters want to send to Washington?
00:00:23.839 --> 00:00:35.280
Professor Larry Sabato, founder of UVA's Center for Politics, is the name behind Sabato's crystal ball that's predicted winners and losers for a quarter century.
00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:40.960
Today, we're asking him to look into that crystal ball and tell us what he sees.
00:00:41.280 --> 00:00:46.000
From Ballard Studios in the nation's capital, it's 13th embark.
00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:49.039
I never dreamed going into a White House.
00:00:49.280 --> 00:00:51.439
You risk your freedom.
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:54.560
We in Congress will act together when we have to act.
00:00:54.640 --> 00:00:57.280
They deserve better and we owe them some results.
00:00:57.520 --> 00:01:00.479
I believe this country's best days continue to remain ahead.
00:01:06.079 --> 00:01:09.280
Well, I don't have any Emmy Awards behind me yet, but you know, I'm sure they're covered.
00:01:09.439 --> 00:01:12.560
I'm so glad to be here on 13th and Park.
00:01:12.959 --> 00:01:17.040
Larry Sabodeau, this is the third time you joined us on 13th and Park.
00:01:17.120 --> 00:01:19.519
I can't tell you how much fun I have when you come on.
00:01:19.599 --> 00:01:23.920
And I think about all the work you do leading up to election night.
00:01:24.159 --> 00:01:26.560
What is your election night itself like?
00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:32.879
Oh well, when I was younger, turning 75, next birthday.
00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:42.400
Wow, uh, I used to go to a network, or a lot of times I'd do BBC, France, uh, TV, or whatever it was.
00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:47.439
And that was fun because uh they're all headquartered in DC, so it's just three hours away.
00:01:47.519 --> 00:01:47.920
Right.
00:01:48.239 --> 00:01:52.480
But that is just too much, and we have too many requests.
00:01:52.640 --> 00:02:01.680
So now I sit in this studio and in five or 10-minute increments, try to handle about a hundred different organizations.
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:05.439
So obviously, we're gonna have to clone more of you in the the age of AI.
00:02:05.519 --> 00:02:07.280
I think that's doable, Larry.
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:13.840
Well, you know, somebody suggested that to me, and I said the AI, Larry Savato would probably be a lot better than the real one.
00:02:13.919 --> 00:02:19.199
So go so let's let's talk about what everyone is now focused on, the midterms.
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:23.840
What is your crystal ball saying about who's gonna carry the House, who will control the Senate?
00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:30.080
In the House, we think that Democrats, in the end, will control 230 plus seats.
00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:31.840
Now, what does the plus mean?
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:34.080
We'll come out with our final predictions Monday.
00:02:34.159 --> 00:02:39.280
I don't know the exact count, but I don't think it's gonna be particularly close from everything that I've seen.
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:46.879
So people have kind of put that one to bed, maybe wrongly, and uh focused on the Senate and certain governors' contests instead.
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:54.479
And the Senate, I would never have imagined a year ago that Democrats would be on the verge of taking control of the Senate.
00:02:54.560 --> 00:03:07.759
I just didn't imagine it because this is the most Republican group of states that you can have of the three classes, but I think they're right on the edge of getting 50, 51, 52 somewhere in that vicinity.
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:13.840
Still time for it to turn around because you have so many October and maybe even early November surprises.
00:03:14.159 --> 00:03:21.120
You had one uh just uh a few minutes ago on the Democratic candidate uh for Senate in Alaska.
00:03:21.439 --> 00:03:32.639
Turns out a staff member of hers turned over the goods about uh the second Dan Sullivan uh being put on there by her staff and the D D SCC and so on.
00:03:32.800 --> 00:03:41.120
So there are lots of those on both sides, you know, with the doing away with some of the tariffs on Canada certainly will help Susan Collins.
00:03:41.439 --> 00:03:44.400
You know, we look at the factors that drive political fates.
00:03:44.639 --> 00:03:49.680
This year, the cost of living, affordability certainly is front and center, corruption has become a big issue.
00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:54.960
It's always a referendum on the party that's in, in this case, a referendum part on the president.
00:03:55.120 --> 00:04:00.000
But you've said, in your own words, that every election is determined by the people who show up.
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:08.800
So how much will turnout maybe drive ultimate fortunes in the Senate races in particular, where a lot of these races are within the margin of error?
00:04:09.120 --> 00:04:10.960
Well, that's why the Democrats are leading.
00:04:11.120 --> 00:04:16.399
It isn't that uh there's a well of support for them or their leadership across the country.
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:23.040
It's that they're rejecting, that is, the voters are rejecting President Trump and the Republicans in Congress and elsewhere.
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:25.120
They're unhappy, they want to change.
00:04:25.279 --> 00:04:27.839
That's normally what happens when people are unhappy.
00:04:27.920 --> 00:04:31.279
It's not that different, really, the 2024 in reverse.
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:41.839
So it's going to be very difficult in the final days for Republicans to turn around the image of being responsible for high prices, especially on gas and diesel.
Load full transcript
00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:50.000
The Iran war is enormously unpopular and connected to the price rises and a corruption you mentioned, which is absolutely important.
00:04:50.399 --> 00:04:55.120
How much of this also gets into kind of an irony in this election?
00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:59.839
On the one hand, you've got the president whose ratings are clearly down.
00:05:00.160 --> 00:05:03.600
On the other hand, you have the alternative, the Democratic Party.
00:05:03.759 --> 00:05:10.240
Generally, their disapproval numbers, latest polling I'm seeing low to mid-50s, they're not liked either.
00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:19.680
Could that have an impact at all in voters sending a message, you might say, both to the president and to Washington on the other side of the coin?
00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:21.120
Well, it's possible.
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:30.560
I think it's unlikely because of the tradition you mentioned right in the beginning, which is midterm elections are used to send a message to the president, the president's party.
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:33.920
Because I think most people know Democrats aren't in charge of anything.
00:05:34.079 --> 00:05:37.199
Part of it's their own fault, but they're not in charge of anything.
00:05:37.439 --> 00:05:43.680
So it's tough to place responsibility on them for the economy or the war or anything else.
00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:46.240
So I doubt that works, but we'll see.
00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:50.160
Always open to possibilities in certain close contests.
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:56.399
So let's talk about three Senate races in particular: Maine, Texas, and Ohio.
00:05:56.720 --> 00:06:06.079
So in Maine, Susan Collins, the perennial Susan Collins from the Milltown Caribou, Maine, comes back once again to try to hold her a seat.
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:22.639
One of the most independent Republican members of the Senate, when you look at her voting record, et cetera, can she survive in a state that is clearly uh more independent, probably more impacted by things that are not necessarily happening on this administration's watchlight?
00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:26.319
And then, of course, recent announcements like the tariffs on Canada.
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:32.879
What are you looking for in that race for her to maybe pull it off one more time in a re-election?
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:35.120
She's already proved it to me.
00:06:35.199 --> 00:06:36.639
She did it in 2020.
00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:40.000
And conditions then were bad for Republicans as well.
00:06:40.079 --> 00:06:42.879
And Biden carried Maine by about nine points.
00:06:43.040 --> 00:06:51.759
But the incredible thing was the polling average, which is supposed to be so accurate compared to individual polls, had her losing by about eight points.
00:06:51.920 --> 00:06:53.920
And instead, she won by eight points.
00:06:54.000 --> 00:06:54.160
Right.
00:06:54.480 --> 00:06:59.680
16 points difference between what the polls predicted and what actually happened.
00:06:59.839 --> 00:07:03.120
So frankly, I don't pay attention to the polls in Maine.
00:07:03.199 --> 00:07:05.519
I just don't because I think they're misleading.
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:07.920
They have been and they deserve a penalty.
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:10.800
They need to be in the penalty box for one election.
00:07:10.959 --> 00:07:25.680
Now, having said that, if she loses, it's not going to be because people are rejecting Susan Collins, other than hardcore Democrats who, you know, resent the fact that she's she approved uh his Supreme Court nominees and that kind of thing.
00:07:25.839 --> 00:07:39.040
And by the way, I actually observed privately, and I won't say what the circumstances were, the Republican leadership approaching her and trying to convince her to vote for one of President Trump's nominees to the court.
00:07:39.439 --> 00:07:40.879
And she was very resistant.
00:07:40.959 --> 00:07:42.399
I mean, she put up a fight.
00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:49.759
Now, in the end, they got her vote, but this wasn't the kind of, hey, let's just pretend that I really don't want this.
00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:52.079
Let's go ahead and I'll give you my vote.
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:54.560
But you know, I put up a heck of a fight, didn't I?
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:55.519
No, I saw it.
00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:57.759
She actually did put up a heck of a fight.
00:07:57.920 --> 00:08:07.360
As far as as Collins is concerned, what I see up there is a Democratic candidate who, frankly, is not terribly able.
00:08:07.519 --> 00:08:08.720
He's really unimpressive.
00:08:08.800 --> 00:08:11.839
I've had everybody say that to me Democrat, Republican.
00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:15.920
The first one was impressive, but was scandal drenched, you know, platinum.
00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:17.920
So they couldn't get it right.
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:23.519
But if she loses to him in particular, it's gonna all be due to Donald Trump.
00:08:23.600 --> 00:08:33.600
I mean, there's no other reason for Trump and what comes with him, the war and the higher prices and corruption and so on, because she's done nothing particularly wrong that I can see.
00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:37.440
Let's hop from there to the state of Texas.
00:08:37.679 --> 00:08:41.440
Remember the 2018, the Beto Aurora race against Ted Cruz?
00:08:41.519 --> 00:08:49.360
And how many times there was a lot of conjecture about this could be the time when the Democrats break the line and Beto will come through.
00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:51.120
And he was full of excitement.
00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:56.799
He was younger, he's generational, and he ended up losing, I think, at the end by two to three points.
00:08:57.120 --> 00:09:03.759
This is a different ball game this year with Ken Paxton and Tyler Rico, I think starting with the candidates themselves.
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:05.120
What's your opinion?
00:09:05.519 --> 00:09:07.840
Well, that is exactly my opinion.
00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:09.519
Let's start with
Paxton.
00:09:09.759 --> 00:09:11.360
Ask yourself a question.
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:29.919
If the Republicans had ignored Trump, who was after Cornyn for almost nothing, you know, we said some bad things about him for a couple of weeks in early 2024, for goodness sakes, and a member of the leadership, well respected, had won a series of elections to statewide office, not just U.S.
00:09:30.080 --> 00:09:30.480
Senate.
00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:34.240
If they'd kept him, we would not be talking about Texas right now.
00:09:34.399 --> 00:09:37.440
There would be no point in it because Cornyn would have won easily.
00:09:38.000 --> 00:09:43.440
But instead, they went for a candidate who is drenched in scandals and problems.
00:09:43.600 --> 00:09:46.559
And that's what gives Taller Rico his his opening.
00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:48.399
Yes, he's talented.
00:09:48.559 --> 00:09:50.080
Yes, he's charismatic.
00:09:50.159 --> 00:09:54.320
He's all those words we used to use a lot in the 70s when your dad was doing political ads.
00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:54.720
Right.
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:58.879
But it wouldn't be enough if it weren't for the substitution of candidates.
00:09:59.039 --> 00:10:03.279
And you know, I've resisted saying Taller Rico would win.
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:08.000
But as we're approaching election day, I think that's probably what's going to happen.
00:10:08.159 --> 00:10:08.639
Probably.
00:10:09.039 --> 00:10:11.120
I want to talk about Iowa and Kansas.
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:15.279
They're here two reliable, pretty deep-red Republican states.
00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:17.440
Both Senate candidates are in play.
00:10:17.679 --> 00:10:20.000
Ashley Henson in Iowa and Dr.
00:10:20.159 --> 00:10:30.960
Marshall in Kansas, which would have, again, to your point in the very beginning, Larry, would have been inconceivable a year ago that either seat would really be seriously threatened, but both of them are.
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:38.879
Which one are you in particularly focused on as maybe the ultimate bellwether on what election night is really going to be?
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.720
Well, I don't think either one is a bellwether because they're still tied.
00:10:43.039 --> 00:10:44.799
Both of them are dead tied.
00:10:45.039 --> 00:10:52.240
Every new poll we see, whether it's a public poll or private poll, has essentially the same thing, one or two points of difference.
00:10:52.480 --> 00:10:54.799
And as you say, it's incredible that that's true.
00:10:55.039 --> 00:10:57.200
Ashley Henson is an excellent candidate.
00:10:57.279 --> 00:11:01.440
She's got all the candidate skills that I was told she had, and then some.
00:11:01.840 --> 00:11:08.159
And she's also been smart enough to separate herself from President Trump on several issues, and that helps her.
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:16.240
The Democrat, Josh Turek, had a lot of appealing personal characteristics, but he has the weight of his party on his back.
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:21.039
Democrats have been out of the game for well over a decade now.
00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:22.720
That's tough to overcome.
00:11:22.879 --> 00:11:27.679
You know, I would give a tiny edge to Henson that we're watching that carefully because it is tied.
00:11:28.240 --> 00:11:44.240
Kansas Democrats could not have gone out and used AI better than to create the candidate they've got, Adam Hamilton, because he's the leader of the largest church denomination, semi-evangelical, in Kansas.
00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:49.679
Well, that's a group of voters you don't normally see picking the Democratic side.
00:11:49.840 --> 00:11:53.919
And the Republican incumbent, with all due respect to him, is not a good candidate.
00:11:54.080 --> 00:11:55.679
He doesn't have good candidate skills.
00:11:55.759 --> 00:11:57.600
He's the opposite of Ashley Henson.
00:11:57.759 --> 00:12:08.399
Again, Kansas is so Republican that President Trump there can make that one or two-point difference to pull Roger Marshall across.
00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:17.200
Give me a race on election night that you are really going to focus on that will pretty much validate what's going to happen.
00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:18.720
Ohio Senate.
00:12:18.879 --> 00:12:19.200
Okay.
00:12:19.440 --> 00:12:23.039
The reason is because Ohioans were tired of Sherrod Brown.
00:12:23.200 --> 00:12:26.000
That's one reason why he lost two years ago.
00:12:26.159 --> 00:12:30.559
And it's very rare that people come back after just two years to the same office.
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:32.879
Yes, it's the other seat, but it's the same office.
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:44.399
And he's running against a guy who looks good and sounds good, has been a series of statewide offices who was appointed to the seat, which was vice president Vance's before he was elected.
00:12:44.639 --> 00:12:50.480
Now, you would think that would be an easy victory for the Republicans, but it is not.
00:12:50.639 --> 00:12:54.480
I kind of think Brown will pull it out, but it's close enough.
00:12:54.720 --> 00:12:58.320
Brown has never broken out into a lead beyond three points.
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:07.120
The governor's race, I think, is over in the Democratic direction because of that terrible ad that was put up, which by the way, your father would never have approved.
00:13:07.600 --> 00:13:09.360
And I'm absolutely certain of that.
00:13:09.759 --> 00:13:12.240
You know, he was a positive upbeat guy.
00:13:12.399 --> 00:13:13.360
I loved his ads.
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:18.559
I still show them in class and always mention him because he was a great guy.
00:13:18.879 --> 00:13:20.879
And we don't do that anymore.
00:13:20.960 --> 00:13:22.639
I wish we could get back to it.
00:13:22.720 --> 00:13:33.600
If only we could sell people on the idea that many voters want to learn the positive qualities of a candidate, not just the negative qualities of the opponent.
00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:40.559
I'm going to go to one of the books
you wrote that wasn't the rise of political consultants that featured Robert Goodman and what other luminaries.
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:41.919
Never forget that.
00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:48.159
But you know, about a quarter century later, you wrote a book called A More Perfect Constitution.
00:13:48.399 --> 00:13:54.399
In that book, you had a couple of prescriptions of how to, in your opinion, kind of right the ship in government.
00:13:54.639 --> 00:14:05.440
Universal national service, which I think is a tremendous idea, mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices, a six-year, a single six-year term for the President of the United States.
00:14:05.759 --> 00:14:13.279
And then you've said quote, because of the structure of the contemporary American party system, every president is polarizing.
00:14:13.759 --> 00:14:25.120
So to that last point, is constitutional reform, which is the other thing that was front and center in that book, is that a remedy, A, that really could right the ship?
00:14:25.279 --> 00:14:30.639
And B, is it in this day and age, in your opinion, Larry, doable?
00:14:31.759 --> 00:14:33.039
The last question is easy.
00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:34.080
It is not doable.
00:14:34.320 --> 00:14:52.879
Now, eventually, my hope is it will be, because at some point, the country with rusting structures and institutions and processes is going to have to return to the Constitution and update it, which, by the way, was exactly what all of our founders advised.
00:14:53.120 --> 00:14:57.039
Jefferson wanted it done every generation, once every 19 years.
00:14:57.519 --> 00:14:59.360
We have utterly failed.
00:14:59.600 --> 00:15:08.000
We need it, and we're going to have to turn to it because uh we differ too much on many of the social issues, and there's no way to bridge them.
00:15:08.159 --> 00:15:16.720
And I think you leave them out, you leave them to the side to the side, and then generations yet unborn will resolve which way we go on them.
00:15:16.799 --> 00:15:18.480
Or maybe it will change over time.
00:15:18.639 --> 00:15:21.360
But the structures of government have got to be updated.
00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:22.720
Thank you for remembering that.
00:15:22.799 --> 00:15:30.159
I had 23 changes to the Constitution, and I've been pushing them since the book was published in 2007.
00:15:30.399 --> 00:15:36.240
And uh my influence is such that I'm proud to say that exactly zero of the 23 have come to be.
00:15:36.639 --> 00:15:44.320
But we're going to work on that, and I know I can depend on young guys like you to continue the fight for universal public service.
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:47.600
My God, it was I'm yeah, in favor of the draft.
00:15:47.679 --> 00:15:48.879
I'm sorry, I am.
00:15:49.120 --> 00:15:50.159
Come after me.
00:15:50.399 --> 00:15:51.519
But it was good.
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:57.919
My dad loved the fact that he served during World War II with people from every stratum of society.
00:15:58.159 --> 00:16:00.720
And this is the way America worked best.
00:16:00.879 --> 00:16:01.840
Let's get back to it.
00:16:02.159 --> 00:16:03.120
Two final questions.
00:16:03.279 --> 00:16:06.960
One, what do you offer Americans in terms of hope?
00:16:07.200 --> 00:16:09.120
Like after the election, we're going to have a horse race.
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:10.559
We'll have many horse races.
00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:13.840
And then after the races are done, we all go home.
00:16:13.919 --> 00:16:18.799
And then we have to face it could be a different Congress, could be it, could be a different Senate.
00:16:19.039 --> 00:16:26.240
Is that going to make a fundamental difference in the quality of life of Americans to the point where we have something to cheer for, maybe again?
00:16:26.399 --> 00:16:34.960
And if not, doesn't it go back to the very point of that book that until or unless we have structural reform, we're really not going to change much of anything?
00:16:35.279 --> 00:16:36.240
I think the latter.
00:16:36.559 --> 00:16:41.679
Look, let's suppose Democrats take over both houses, but they certainly don't have a veto-approved majority.
00:16:41.840 --> 00:16:42.000
Right.
00:16:42.159 --> 00:16:46.080
Well, all President Trump has to do is veto whatever they pass.
00:16:46.159 --> 00:16:49.519
And of course, as you know, Democrats tend to split and fight.
00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:55.279
So I don't know how much would be passed, but whatever is passed, it isn't going to go to fundamentals.
00:16:55.759 --> 00:17:10.720
So all in all, I think Americans gradually are being convinced that our system, which is fundamentally sound and for which we are very grateful to the founders, needs revision, needs reform.
00:17:10.960 --> 00:17:13.519
And we're going to reach the point where we have to do it.
00:17:13.680 --> 00:17:18.240
It's certainly not going to be under the current structure with the current office holders.
00:17:18.319 --> 00:17:19.519
They're just too divisive.
00:17:19.680 --> 00:17:27.680
So the earliest we could look at this would be beginning in January of 2029 with a new president and yet another new Congress.
00:17:28.079 --> 00:17:35.759
So in 2008, you came within one electoral vote of making the ultimate perfect prediction of how that race would come out.
00:17:35.920 --> 00:17:38.000
And now we fast forward.
00:17:38.240 --> 00:17:40.240
What is your final assessment?
00:17:40.400 --> 00:17:43.359
I know this is it changes by the day in polls, whatever.
00:17:43.519 --> 00:17:46.960
You've already said the House is going to go and maybe significantly.
00:17:47.119 --> 00:17:48.960
What's your final assessment in the Senate?
00:17:49.440 --> 00:17:52.160
Best Republicans can do, I think, is 50-50.
00:17:52.240 --> 00:17:56.480
And that suggests that Democrats will get 51 or 52.
00:17:56.720 --> 00:18:04.559
Now remember, if they get 51, they're not going to have control of the Senate because they don't have 60 votes and they have to worry about Senator Fetterman from Pennsylvania.
00:18:04.720 --> 00:18:04.880
Right.
00:18:05.119 --> 00:18:08.160
We'll agree with the GOP on at least some subjects.
00:18:08.400 --> 00:18:12.000
So, you know, again, the heart of our system is compromise.
00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:14.960
We used to do it better than any country on earth.
00:18:15.119 --> 00:18:17.039
Now we barely do it at all.
00:18:17.279 --> 00:18:19.279
We've got to get back to that.
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:22.319
That's the way we make our offices run, for example.
00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:23.759
We all experience that.
00:18:23.920 --> 00:18:26.640
Our families, we compromise all the time, right?
00:18:27.039 --> 00:18:28.000
We know how to do it.
00:18:28.319 --> 00:18:33.039
Well, let's apply that at the national and state and local level in government too.
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:41.599
Well, Larry Saboteau, for the third time on 13th and Park, can't tell you how much I appreciated your friendship as well as your wisdom.
00:18:41.759 --> 00:19:00.880
And I hope in the many, many years you and I still have to tread on the face of this earth that we can bring people to a better place of expecting more from government, more from politics, frankly, and the kind of leadership we know is deep inside the American ethos.
00:19:01.359 --> 00:19:05.359
We just have to rediscover that as we start to move forward.
00:19:05.680 --> 00:19:08.079
Let's hope, and we at least have to try.
00:19:08.240 --> 00:19:14.640
That would be the ultimate abandonment of the fundamentals in the United States and our founders if we did not try.
00:19:14.880 --> 00:19:16.640
Larry Sabato, get some rest.
00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:18.000
I think you're going to need it.
00:19:18.319 --> 00:19:19.920
Thank you very much for that.
00:19:20.240 --> 00:19:21.599
Always good to see you.