رونوشت 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:05.129 --> 00:00:06.309
Hold your ears, folks.
2
00:00:06.990 --> 00:00:10.570
It's showtime. People pay good money to see this movie.
3
00:00:10.970 --> 00:00:13.539
When they go out to a theater, they want cold sodas,
4
00:00:13.900 --> 00:00:17.179
hot popcorn, and no monsters in the projection booth.
5
00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:19.160
Everyone pretend podcasting isn't boring.
6
00:00:20.300 --> 00:00:26.750
Turn it off. Turn it off!
7
00:00:44.149 --> 00:00:46.609
Welcome to the Projection Booth. I'm your host, Mike White.
8
00:00:46.689 --> 00:00:50.170
My guest this episode is the film critic and historian
9
00:00:50.549 --> 00:00:54.829
David Thompson, whose new book, A Sudden Flicker of Light,
10
00:00:55.270 --> 00:00:59.350
A Revisionist History of Movies, retraces the medium from its
11
00:00:59.429 --> 00:01:04.849
photographic origins through the electronic age, with stops at Orson Welles,
12
00:01:05.319 --> 00:01:10.030
The Godfather, and Oppenheimer along the way. A sudden flicker
13
00:01:10.069 --> 00:01:13.150
of light is available now. I had a great time
14
00:01:13.209 --> 00:01:15.689
talking with David, and I hope you have a great
15
00:01:15.750 --> 00:01:16.450
time listening.
16
00:01:16.909 --> 00:01:20.129
Enjoy. Well, how did you get interested in film in
17
00:01:20.150 --> 00:01:20.730
the first place?
18
00:01:21.489 --> 00:01:27.060
I was taken by my parents to see Henry V,
19
00:01:27.859 --> 00:01:32.780
the Olivier version. This would have been in 1945. And
20
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:36.640
they took me to see it, I think, because it
21
00:01:36.680 --> 00:01:41.109
was sort of a patriotic duty. Having just won the
22
00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:47.189
war or emerged, the idea of the English victory at
23
00:01:47.290 --> 00:01:52.030
Agincourt was very romantic. And so I was taken to
24
00:01:52.049 --> 00:01:57.049
the film. And it was packed, as films were in
25
00:01:57.109 --> 00:02:02.709
those days. Big theater, 2,000 seats every seat. filled kind
26
00:02:02.750 --> 00:02:06.959
of thing, you know. And, of course, I didn't understand it.
27
00:02:07.390 --> 00:02:09.250
I couldn't understand the language.
28
00:02:10.289 --> 00:02:16.080
But there's a point in the film where the English
29
00:02:16.159 --> 00:02:21.180
court is over and knights in armor are in the
30
00:02:21.259 --> 00:02:24.379
green fields of Ireland, in fact, where they filmed it,
31
00:02:24.460 --> 00:02:29.360
very unlike the France where Agincourt occurred. And I just thought,
32
00:02:29.419 --> 00:02:32.500
this is the most amazing, beautiful thing I've ever seen.
33
00:02:33.460 --> 00:02:38.099
Until there was a scene where the French attack the
34
00:02:38.189 --> 00:02:42.590
English camp and they set fire to the camp and
35
00:02:42.710 --> 00:02:48.250
page boys burn alive. And I believed I had seen
36
00:02:48.270 --> 00:02:51.969
the faces of children not that much older than I
37
00:02:52.060 --> 00:02:53.300
was on fire.
38
00:02:53.919 --> 00:02:55.759
And I screamed. I mean, literally.
39
00:02:56.180 --> 00:02:58.240
And my father had to carry me out of the
40
00:02:58.259 --> 00:03:03.479
cinema because I was causing such a disturbance. And I
41
00:03:03.539 --> 00:03:06.639
realized that I learned years later that what I had
42
00:03:06.740 --> 00:03:11.409
seen was a dissolve. It was two images, the page
43
00:03:11.469 --> 00:03:17.810
boys asleep and flames. And at age four or whatever, four,
44
00:03:18.669 --> 00:03:20.810
the poetry of it carried me away.
45
00:03:20.830 --> 00:03:25.889
I had seen people on fire. And I was terrified.
46
00:03:26.770 --> 00:03:32.250
But wildly excited, and I sort of still am. I mean,
47
00:03:33.009 --> 00:03:39.080
the magic and the poetry of moving imagery still gives
48
00:03:39.180 --> 00:03:44.300
me as big a thrill as I just get walking
49
00:03:44.340 --> 00:03:48.050
in the countryside or listening to music, those things, you know,
50
00:03:48.090 --> 00:03:56.699
the great things. And my family quickly learned that if
51
00:03:56.740 --> 00:04:01.039
they were looking after me or responsible for me, take
52
00:04:01.080 --> 00:04:04.280
me to a movie. It didn't really matter what the
53
00:04:04.340 --> 00:04:07.719
movie was. I just loved being in the dark, looking
54
00:04:07.780 --> 00:04:08.280
at the light.
55
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:09.689
Still do.
56
00:04:10.599 --> 00:04:13.210
Okay. Well, it's one thing to enjoy movies, but it's
57
00:04:13.270 --> 00:04:16.350
another thing to dedicate your whole life to films. And
58
00:04:16.389 --> 00:04:19.189
I'm curious, how did you kind of move into more
59
00:04:19.209 --> 00:04:21.670
of like the critical writing realm of things?
60
00:04:22.649 --> 00:04:28.279
Well, as I said, I went to movies a lot.
61
00:04:28.579 --> 00:04:33.610
I lived in South London, and in the school holidays,
62
00:04:33.850 --> 00:04:36.009
I was on my own.
63
00:04:36.569 --> 00:04:38.670
My mother worked. My father was away.
64
00:04:38.689 --> 00:04:45.420
I would walk, easy short walk, to one of three
65
00:04:45.500 --> 00:04:49.180
local cinemas, and I would go to see films. And
66
00:04:49.319 --> 00:04:53.500
if the film had what was called an A certificate,
67
00:04:53.560 --> 00:04:57.370
which meant that If you were under 14, you had
68
00:04:57.410 --> 00:04:59.790
to have an adult, a parent with you.
69
00:05:00.709 --> 00:05:04.149
I would ask strangers if they would take me in.
70
00:05:04.379 --> 00:05:07.709
You know, today, the idea that you were allowing your
71
00:05:07.769 --> 00:05:12.600
kid to wait outside the cinema asking strangers to take
72
00:05:12.620 --> 00:05:15.160
him in, it would be shocking. You'd be sent for
73
00:05:15.240 --> 00:05:18.660
social services and criminal charges even.
74
00:05:20.100 --> 00:05:21.019
I did it often.
75
00:05:21.980 --> 00:05:26.040
Nothing ever happened to me, apart from the films. So
76
Load full transcript
00:05:26.100 --> 00:05:30.259
I saw everything. Time went by. As I got into
77
00:05:30.300 --> 00:05:34.949
my sort of early teens, I was more or less
78
00:05:36.009 --> 00:05:39.509
on course to go to university. I was supposed to
79
00:05:39.550 --> 00:05:43.470
be doing all my homework and so on. And in fact,
80
00:05:43.550 --> 00:05:48.759
I was sneaking off to movies. And my mother, in great,
81
00:05:49.040 --> 00:05:53.300
great wisdom, I think, said, well, I don't really approve
82
00:05:53.379 --> 00:05:56.529
of you going to all these movies. If you're going
83
00:05:56.550 --> 00:06:00.949
to go see them, all I ask is that you
84
00:06:01.009 --> 00:06:06.230
write something about them. So I would begin to write
85
00:06:06.610 --> 00:06:10.730
on yellow legal pads. I didn't think of it as
86
00:06:10.810 --> 00:06:18.449
a film review, but forgive me. I was writing a review,
87
00:06:18.470 --> 00:06:23.009
and I probably wrote a couple of hundred like that
88
00:06:23.709 --> 00:06:29.939
in my teen years. I found the challenge of saying
89
00:06:30.040 --> 00:06:36.339
what I had felt about a film very interesting. At
90
00:06:36.399 --> 00:06:40.939
that point, I began to think to myself, well, do
91
00:06:41.000 --> 00:06:43.910
I really want to go to Oxford and study history,
92
00:06:43.970 --> 00:06:47.149
which was the course I was on, or do I
93
00:06:47.230 --> 00:06:52.870
want to do something more directly related to this extraordinary
94
00:06:52.930 --> 00:06:59.199
passion in my life? I saw an advertisement for a
95
00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:03.540
place called the London School of Film Technique, which was
96
00:07:03.639 --> 00:07:06.139
in fact, I didn't know it, but in fact it
97
00:07:06.199 --> 00:07:09.850
was the only place in England at the level of
98
00:07:09.930 --> 00:07:15.569
higher education where film was studied. This was 1960. So
99
00:07:15.870 --> 00:07:19.550
I gave up my place at Oxford and I went
100
00:07:19.589 --> 00:07:23.459
to film school. And a life of ruin ensued.
101
00:07:24.759 --> 00:07:29.279
Growing up in the 50s, 60s, and then eventually into
102
00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:32.899
the 70s, where you're probably already working at that time,
103
00:07:32.959 --> 00:07:36.139
I mean, this is a great era of film. And
104
00:07:36.170 --> 00:07:40.050
I'm so curious, what types of movies or what things
105
00:07:40.129 --> 00:07:42.509
really kind of blew your mind when you were seeing
106
00:07:42.529 --> 00:07:43.410
them for the first time?
107
00:07:44.370 --> 00:07:50.959
Well, as a very young kid, I loved adventure. That
108
00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:56.290
was often westerns. Red River. was a very.
109
00:07:55.910 --> 00:08:01.699
Important film in my childhood. And it made me just
110
00:08:01.819 --> 00:08:05.899
want to be there with that gang of cowboys driving cattle.
111
00:08:06.740 --> 00:08:08.360
Not a thing at which I think I would have
112
00:08:08.379 --> 00:08:12.350
been
very good, but imaginatively, I wanted to be there
113
00:08:12.389 --> 00:08:16.730
doing it. And I suppose as I grew older, I
114
00:08:17.750 --> 00:08:21.620
began to feel attracted to love stories in a way which,
115
00:08:22.220 --> 00:08:26.009
as a young child, I... I had flinched from love stories.
116
00:08:26.050 --> 00:08:29.220
Those terrible kissing scenes, you know, I don't want to
117
00:08:29.279 --> 00:08:33.340
look kind of thing. I began to feel, well, kissing
118
00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:37.379
looks as if it might be pretty good. And, you know,
119
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:39.440
in the natural.
120
00:08:39.070 --> 00:08:39.909
Way of growing up.
121
00:08:40.629 --> 00:08:46.649
And it was in my mid-teens, about 15 or so,
122
00:08:47.490 --> 00:08:51.509
that I saw Citizen Kane for the first time. And
123
00:08:51.580 --> 00:08:55.399
I had read a little bit. to indicate that this
124
00:08:55.460 --> 00:09:00.090
was a very important film. And I went to see it,
125
00:09:01.139 --> 00:09:07.179
and I simply could not understand it, but I felt
126
00:09:08.320 --> 00:09:14.580
more emotionally moved and sort of mentally engaged than I.
127
00:09:14.600 --> 00:09:16.110
Ever had in a film.
128
00:09:16.350 --> 00:09:20.429
And I would never have been able to articulate it
129
00:09:20.490 --> 00:09:22.870
in this way, but I suppose what happened was that
130
00:09:22.950 --> 00:09:27.519
I saw this medium had a depth that really was
131
00:09:27.620 --> 00:09:32.529
not sufficiently covered by the word entertainment. I loved the
132
00:09:32.590 --> 00:09:36.649
entertainment value in films, but it was clear to me
133
00:09:36.769 --> 00:09:41.370
that they could be as profound as things that also
134
00:09:41.509 --> 00:09:44.210
moved me greatly. I mean, I was a huge Miles
135
00:09:44.470 --> 00:09:49.539
Davis fan around the same time, and I was reading...
136
00:09:50.019 --> 00:09:54.750
People like Hemingway, Fitzgerald, and Faulkner, not always understanding, but
137
00:09:55.610 --> 00:09:58.750
really engaged. And I saw that film could be like that, too.
138
00:10:00.269 --> 00:10:05.759
And so, I mean, initially, I wanted to make films,
139
00:10:06.000 --> 00:10:09.419
you know. I think any kid who's carried away by
140
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:12.850
the medium wants to do that. And I sort of,
141
00:10:13.580 --> 00:10:17.820
I did for a while. And I still am interested
142
00:10:17.940 --> 00:10:23.529
in writing for films. But writing about film became my career.
143
00:10:23.950 --> 00:10:29.269
And teaching. All connected. So here we are. At the
144
00:10:29.309 --> 00:10:32.870
age of 85. I'm still excited.
145
00:10:33.889 --> 00:10:37.649
I'm wise enough to think I probably took a disastrous
146
00:10:37.730 --> 00:10:38.769
career direction.
147
00:10:38.850 --> 00:10:40.750
But there we are. You know.
148
00:10:41.529 --> 00:10:45.080
Maybe you have a similar story to tell. Maybe you've
149
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:46.059
gone the same way.
150
00:10:46.080 --> 00:10:46.740
I don't know.
151
00:10:47.759 --> 00:10:47.899
Look.
152
00:10:48.679 --> 00:10:51.919
I love the kind of metafiction that you do. You're
153
00:10:51.960 --> 00:10:57.480
kind of mixing both the movies and writing fiction stuff,
154
00:10:57.500 --> 00:11:02.529
but especially the Warren Beatty book. I just really liked that,
155
00:11:02.549 --> 00:11:04.269
and I liked your approach to that so much.
156
00:11:05.230 --> 00:11:10.149
Well, you know, I did... I don't know how to
157
00:11:10.230 --> 00:11:17.620
express this adequately. I did begin to feel that my urge...
158
00:11:18.620 --> 00:11:22.480
to make movies and my interest in writing, because I
159
00:11:22.559 --> 00:11:28.299
love writing, meshed and led me into writing and thinking
160
00:11:28.340 --> 00:11:34.419
of stories about what happened to the characters in films
161
00:11:34.460 --> 00:11:38.960
when the film was over. I was really fascinated in that.
162
00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:43.539
And when I saw Rebel Without a Cause, which was
163
00:11:43.580 --> 00:11:49.840
a very important film in my youth, I lived and
164
00:11:49.929 --> 00:11:56.240
daydreamed for a year at least, wondering what happened to
165
00:11:56.299 --> 00:12:00.860
Dean and Natalie Wood, the couple who are teenagers but
166
00:12:00.899 --> 00:12:04.500
are sort of almost a married couple by the end
167
00:12:04.519 --> 00:12:09.009
of the film. And I was really fascinated in that.
168
00:12:09.470 --> 00:12:13.669
And I still, when I see a film that really
169
00:12:13.730 --> 00:12:17.149
gets me, I sort of take the characters.
170
00:12:16.690 --> 00:12:17.909
Home and live with them.
171
00:12:18.169 --> 00:12:20.700
And I think that led me into a way of
172
00:12:20.799 --> 00:12:26.559
writing about film stories as if they were constant dreams
173
00:12:26.899 --> 00:12:30.600
that one could get into and get out of, as
174
00:12:30.659 --> 00:12:36.289
you wished. And, you know, I still am intrigued by that.
175
00:12:36.570 --> 00:12:39.990
I have a notion. I'm not going to go into
176
00:12:40.009 --> 00:12:44.029
it in detail, but I have a notion about a book.
177
00:12:44.620 --> 00:12:47.779
I'll never write it, I think, but I think about
178
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:51.419
writing it, which is about Warren Bailey as an old man,
179
00:12:51.480 --> 00:12:57.080
which is what he is. And I think a man
180
00:12:57.139 --> 00:13:02.159
who doesn't really like to leave home, that would interest
181
00:13:02.200 --> 00:13:07.620
me as a character study. So I'm still thinking that way, yeah.
182
00:13:08.419 --> 00:13:10.679
I think the first book of yours that I read
183
00:13:10.759 --> 00:13:13.879
was the Rosebud, the Orson Welles book that you wrote.
184
00:13:14.460 --> 00:13:18.710
What was the state of Orson Welles' scholarship at that time?
185
00:13:18.730 --> 00:13:21.309
Because now, you know, you can't throw a
stone without
186
00:13:21.370 --> 00:13:24.549
reading a Oliver Stone, Oliver Stone, Orson Welles book.
187
00:13:26.149 --> 00:13:32.299
Well, I mean, you know, going back in my teens,
188
00:13:32.860 --> 00:13:38.919
in the 50s, as I say, I had found a
189
00:13:39.019 --> 00:13:41.889
couple of books and there were very few books on
190
00:13:41.950 --> 00:13:45.070
film in those days. I had found a couple of
191
00:13:45.129 --> 00:13:49.950
books that said Citizen Kane is an important film. The
192
00:13:50.009 --> 00:13:54.789
problem was you couldn't see it because we're talking about
193
00:13:54.830 --> 00:13:58.580
a film culture, which I think applied in America just
194
00:13:58.629 --> 00:14:02.500
as much as it did in England, where cinema showed
195
00:14:03.200 --> 00:14:06.200
new films and nothing else. That was the way the
196
00:14:06.259 --> 00:14:11.580
business worked. So that after a film had opened, it's run,
197
00:14:12.460 --> 00:14:17.740
it went away. And it was impossible to see old
198
00:14:17.840 --> 00:14:22.620
films because all the things that we now take for granted,
199
00:14:22.700 --> 00:14:29.090
like television running movies, like DVDs, like streaming, they weren't there.
200
00:14:29.919 --> 00:14:33.950
And you might have to wait years to see a
201
00:14:34.990 --> 00:14:38.730
film you'd heard about. And I thought in 1955 that
202
00:14:41.149 --> 00:14:44.929
The world was waiting to see Citizen Kane again. And
203
00:14:44.970 --> 00:14:48.950
when I went to this little repertory cinema near my
204
00:14:48.990 --> 00:14:52.860
house in London, I assumed there would be a great
205
00:14:52.909 --> 00:14:55.480
line of people waiting to see it. I was the
206
00:14:55.600 --> 00:15:01.899
only person there. Wow. So, I mean, there was no scholarship.
207
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:04.559
There was really no study in Wells. And if you
208
00:15:04.600 --> 00:15:10.789
had said Orson Welles to the ordinary person, They probably
209
00:15:10.830 --> 00:15:14.309
would have said the third man. That was the thing
210
00:15:14.350 --> 00:15:17.370
for which Wells was most known. I'm sure that was,
211
00:15:17.450 --> 00:15:23.070
in fact, the first time I encountered him. And it
212
00:15:23.169 --> 00:15:33.740
wasn't until the 60s that people started taking Wells seriously. And,
213
00:15:33.919 --> 00:15:37.019
you know, people like Peter Bogdanovich wrote about him and
214
00:15:37.960 --> 00:15:41.980
It became generally accepted that Citizen Kane really was a
215
00:15:42.019 --> 00:15:45.360
great film and you could see it again. And then
216
00:15:45.480 --> 00:15:51.360
in the early 1970s, Pauline Kael, who was the critic
217
00:15:51.399 --> 00:15:53.019
for The New Yorker and.
218
00:15:52.940 --> 00:15:56.720
A very, very good writer, she wrote.
219
00:15:56.419 --> 00:16:01.399
What really was an attack on Citizen Kane. I think
220
00:16:01.490 --> 00:16:05.350
she knew it was an extraordinary film, but I think
221
00:16:05.389 --> 00:16:09.740
she thought it had been overrated. I think also she
222
00:16:09.799 --> 00:16:13.840
had a certain ambition to write something that would draw
223
00:16:13.879 --> 00:16:18.279
attention to her, which it did. And it sort of
224
00:16:19.240 --> 00:16:23.860
polarized feelings about Wells because those people who loved him
225
00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:28.700
rallied to his support and a few people understood what
226
00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:31.419
Cale was saying, that it was an overrated film, a
227
00:16:31.490 --> 00:16:35.169
shallow film. She called it, in fact, a shallow masterpiece.
228
00:16:35.950 --> 00:16:39.059
And from that point on, And Wells, of course, was
229
00:16:39.100 --> 00:16:43.019
still alive. And one of the things he did all
230
00:16:43.059 --> 00:16:46.779
his life was give extraordinary interviews. So he would give
231
00:16:47.299 --> 00:16:52.679
very long interviews for television stations, things like that, where
232
00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:57.470
he talked beautifully because he was a very articulate, eloquent man,
233
00:16:57.490 --> 00:17:02.610
one of the great voices of our age. And from
234
00:17:02.690 --> 00:17:08.210
then on, he became a central figure And I would
235
00:17:08.289 --> 00:17:11.390
say that at the level of teaching, the.
236
00:17:12.930 --> 00:17:15.349
Director who was most taught.
237
00:17:15.670 --> 00:17:19.890
In England and America and outside would have been Hitchcock.
238
00:17:20.750 --> 00:17:24.750
I think he's the favorite director to teach. But I
239
00:17:25.210 --> 00:17:31.150
think probably Wells was second. And a rush of books began.
240
00:17:32.150 --> 00:17:37.740
And then Simon Cowell began his series. which is still unfinished,
241
00:17:38.319 --> 00:17:43.339
many volumes of biography. And as you say, the Wells
242
00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:47.140
shelf in the library and in my own office, you
243
00:17:47.180 --> 00:17:50.400
can't see it, but it's just over my shoulder. It's
244
00:17:51.059 --> 00:17:54.559
one of the biggest shelves, and I only have a
245
00:17:54.599 --> 00:17:58.150
fraction of the books that have been done on Wells.
246
00:17:58.349 --> 00:18:05.509
But, you know, a great filmmaker, a great raconteur, a
247
00:18:05.549 --> 00:18:06.829
great personality.
248
00:18:06.849 --> 00:18:09.410
You know, we haven't even mentioned the War of the
249
00:18:09.450 --> 00:18:14.480
Worlds on radio, which was such a big event in 1938,
250
00:18:14.480 --> 00:18:21.180
when he was so young. So, so brilliant, and yet
251
00:18:22.140 --> 00:18:26.619
an unfulfilled career too, so that he became emblematic of
252
00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:32.480
the way ambitions can be crushed in the film business. So,
253
00:18:32.509 --> 00:18:38.710
you know, That's a long-winded answer to your question, but yeah,
254
00:18:39.029 --> 00:18:40.190
things change with Wells.
255
00:18:40.930 --> 00:18:43.769
Well, let's talk
about the newest one, A Sudden Flicker
256
00:18:43.789 --> 00:18:47.230
of Light, A Revisionist History of Movies, and the subtitle,
257
00:18:47.769 --> 00:18:50.789
The Revisionist History of Movies. I really want to dig
258
00:18:50.829 --> 00:18:52.630
into that with you. What does that mean for you?
259
00:18:53.490 --> 00:18:59.430
Well, I have seen, as anyone my age will have seen,
260
00:18:59.450 --> 00:19:05.589
a huge... expansion in the film library. So, you know,
261
00:19:06.390 --> 00:19:13.430
there are books now on individual directors, actors, writers. It's
262
00:19:13.470 --> 00:19:15.490
a huge library.
263
00:19:16.369 --> 00:19:18.990
And there were a few subjects that haven't been covered
264
00:19:19.049 --> 00:19:23.329
or touched yet, but only a few. But with all
265
00:19:23.349 --> 00:19:28.380
the concentration on specific individual subjects, there's been a way
266
00:19:28.440 --> 00:19:34.400
in which I think the larger picture has been overlooked.
267
00:19:35.859 --> 00:19:40.769
In recent years, I've become increasingly conscious about where the
268
00:19:40.829 --> 00:19:44.910
medium is going, and that involves some sense of where
269
00:19:44.950 --> 00:19:49.369
it has come from. So I thought that there was
270
00:19:49.410 --> 00:19:54.839
a point and a usefulness maybe in writing a one volume,
271
00:19:55.079 --> 00:20:01.900
fairly concise, selective history of the whole medium. And I
272
00:20:01.980 --> 00:20:04.960
realized that one of the things that would be a
273
00:20:05.819 --> 00:20:12.839
challenge in that project was looking past the individual careers
274
00:20:13.859 --> 00:20:17.839
and saying, really, what has this medium done for our
275
00:20:17.920 --> 00:20:23.519
culture as a whole and for understanding? And even as
276
00:20:23.640 --> 00:20:26.720
I worked on the book over the last, let's say,
277
00:20:26.759 --> 00:20:28.059
the last three years that.
278
00:20:27.980 --> 00:20:29.579
I've been on the book one way or another.
279
00:20:29.599 --> 00:20:35.609
It's become increasingly clear that the medium is in a
280
00:20:35.730 --> 00:20:41.470
drastic process of alteration. The thing that we once called
281
00:20:41.549 --> 00:20:44.950
special effects, which we thought was cute and clever and
282
00:20:45.079 --> 00:20:51.819
funny and cunning and diverting, has become a process whereby
283
00:20:51.900 --> 00:20:57.700
the medium that was once photographic is electronic. So that
284
00:20:58.599 --> 00:21:03.440
the relationship between us and the reality we're looking at
285
00:21:04.119 --> 00:21:09.839
is shifting. And I think by now... Literally, this has happened,
286
00:21:10.640 --> 00:21:13.400
I would say, in the last year. It's gathered momentum
287
00:21:13.460 --> 00:21:17.299
in an amazing way. And the ways in which the
288
00:21:17.339 --> 00:21:22.460
thing that we call AI, which is like sci-fi magnified
289
00:21:22.539 --> 00:21:29.750
to an extraordinary extent, is compromising, taking over, corrupting, diverting
290
00:21:29.769 --> 00:21:34.049
the thing that we've all been so delighted to watch
291
00:21:34.170 --> 00:21:39.900
and so entertained by. And what's revisionist in the book
292
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:42.960
I've done is really a way of saying, look at
293
00:21:43.039 --> 00:21:47.559
the whole thing, because God knows where it is going
294
00:21:48.299 --> 00:21:50.460
and what is going to happen to us in the
295
00:21:50.500 --> 00:21:52.480
way it goes and what's going to happen to the
296
00:21:52.529 --> 00:21:59.630
individuals who try to make films. You know, I lived through,
297
00:22:00.609 --> 00:22:02.430
treasure the fact that I lived through it, and I'm
298
00:22:02.490 --> 00:22:04.990
sure you did too, You're younger than I am, but,
299
00:22:05.029 --> 00:22:07.430
you know, you're close enough in age, you've known it.
300
00:22:07.960 --> 00:22:14.640
We knew the time when entertainment movies worked for millions
301
00:22:14.700 --> 00:22:19.650
of people and were also pretty good and pretty serious. Now,
302
00:22:19.690 --> 00:22:24.230
you think of films... The 70s was a great moment,
303
00:22:25.509 --> 00:22:33.079
the early 70s. And, you know, Chinatown, Taxi Driver, Cuckoo's Nest...
304
00:22:33.759 --> 00:22:34.500
and many.
305
00:22:34.339 --> 00:22:35.210
Other films like that.
306
00:22:36.059 --> 00:22:40.980
Dark, serious films about the world we lived in, but
307
00:22:41.619 --> 00:22:44.460
films you wanted to see over and over again because
308
00:22:44.480 --> 00:22:50.299
they were so good. That, I think, that age has
309
00:22:50.400 --> 00:22:55.640
passed already. I think that there is an increasing divergence
310
00:22:55.740 --> 00:23:00.559
between huge box office films and films that are really interesting.
311
00:23:01.619 --> 00:23:04.519
And It came along too late for me to include
312
00:23:04.539 --> 00:23:07.380
it in the book, but if I could do a coda,
313
00:23:08.680 --> 00:23:13.460
it would certainly include The Odyssey, which is one of
314
00:23:13.519 --> 00:23:19.049
the all-time successful entertainments, and I think it's crap. I
315
00:23:19.490 --> 00:23:25.230
really think it's a hollow sham of a film, and
316
00:23:25.390 --> 00:23:30.039
I feel increasingly that future is coming in which....
317
00:23:31.410 --> 00:23:33.809
Probably the only films really worth.
318
00:23:35.089 --> 00:23:38.250
Seeing and talking about and arguing about are going to
319
00:23:38.289 --> 00:23:44.009
be very small, personal, difficult films that will be harder
320
00:23:44.049 --> 00:23:47.319
and harder to see because they're not going to fit
321
00:23:48.259 --> 00:23:54.180
with the commercial streaming process that says, this is a hit. And,
322
00:23:54.200 --> 00:23:58.180
you know, The Odyssey is enormously influential in the sense
323
00:23:58.259 --> 00:24:02.000
that It convinces the people behind the big business that
324
00:24:02.380 --> 00:24:08.319
the big pictures can still work. I don't think they
325
00:24:08.440 --> 00:24:12.339
are working. And I think a lot of people kidded
326
00:24:12.380 --> 00:24:16.220
themselves about the Odyssey. I think in a couple of years,
327
00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:20.920
the Odyssey may look as dumb as the sound of music.
328
00:24:21.640 --> 00:24:22.480
That's my opinion.
329
00:24:23.710 --> 00:24:27.039
I found it such a fascinating phenomenon, just boots on
330
00:24:27.079 --> 00:24:30.400
the ground and seeing so many of my coworkers and
331
00:24:30.480 --> 00:24:35.640
friends driving across the state and spending the night and
332
00:24:35.700 --> 00:24:39.730
making day trips to go see this in 70 millimeter.
333
00:24:39.750 --> 00:24:40.910
It was wild.
334
00:24:40.930 --> 00:24:44.630
Amazing phenomenon. Yeah, yeah.
335
00:24:44.809 --> 00:24:49.630
It was almost as if a great preacher had suddenly appeared.
336
00:24:50.500 --> 00:24:53.460
On the horizon, and everyone rushed to him. And, you know,
337
00:24:53.500 --> 00:24:56.240
there is something cult-like about it, I think.
338
00:24:57.420 --> 00:25:01.049
No, I would say a lot of Nolan's films fit
339
00:25:01.069 --> 00:25:01.509
into that.
340
00:25:02.190 --> 00:25:02.809
You would say what?
341
00:25:03.390 --> 00:25:05.609
A lot of Nolan's films seem to fit into that.
342
00:25:05.650 --> 00:25:09.109
He seems to be this, you know, even with Tenet
343
00:25:09.210 --> 00:25:12.079
and bringing people back to the theater after the pandemic,
344
00:25:12.150 --> 00:25:12.740
it was such a.
345
00:25:13.539 --> 00:25:17.299
Yeah, absolutely. Fascinating thing. Yeah, yeah.
346
00:25:17.849 --> 00:25:20.609
Anyway, that's what I've tried to do in this book.
347
00:25:22.150 --> 00:25:25.819
And also, a part of the book, an important part
348
00:25:25.839 --> 00:25:30.559
of the book, is the feeling that Donald Trump is
349
00:25:30.619 --> 00:25:35.700
a movie. He's an ongoing movie. Some days you think
350
00:25:36.259 --> 00:25:39.549
it's a farce, and some days you think it's a
351
00:25:39.609 --> 00:25:43.289
horror film. And it's actually both at the same time,
352
00:25:43.869 --> 00:25:45.549
and God knows where it's going.
353
00:25:46.509 --> 00:25:50.630
Absolutely, yeah. Yeah, I was curious as far as how
354
00:25:50.670 --> 00:25:53.259
you even decided how to shape this book, because it
355
00:25:53.630 --> 00:25:56.140
could go off in so many different directions. I'm sure
356
00:25:56.180 --> 00:25:57.880
you had to be very careful as far as just
357
00:25:57.960 --> 00:26:01.079
what you wanted to keep bound within those pages.
358
00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:05.049
Yeah, I mean, shaping it was a big thing, and
359
00:26:05.369 --> 00:26:09.509
I was very much helped by my editor at Simon
360
00:26:09.559 --> 00:26:14.309
& Schuster, Jonathan Zhao. Did a great job on the book.
361
00:26:15.190 --> 00:26:18.980
I wrote some stuff that I cut. I
didn't write
362
00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:21.380
some things that I really think maybe I should have done.
363
00:26:22.259 --> 00:26:25.329
I wanted it to be a book of sort of
364
00:26:25.329 --> 00:26:31.009
350 pages, a certain workable length. And that meant I
365
00:26:31.049 --> 00:26:39.299
had to choose films to concentrate on. There's a lot
366
00:26:39.339 --> 00:26:43.059
left out of the book, but I hope the book
367
00:26:43.180 --> 00:26:46.450
talks about the whole thing in a way that The
368
00:26:46.490 --> 00:26:48.970
things not mentioned fit into it, too.
369
00:26:49.789 --> 00:26:52.130
That's my hope, you know. I mean, I can do
370
00:26:52.190 --> 00:26:55.059
another book, you know. I'm only 85. Come on, you know.
371
00:26:55.859 --> 00:26:56.470
Keep at it.
372
00:26:56.480 --> 00:27:00.259
Yeah, if you keep practicing long enough, maybe one of
373
00:27:00.299 --> 00:27:00.839
these will hit.
374
00:27:01.279 --> 00:27:03.279
I might get it right eventually.
375
00:27:05.829 --> 00:27:07.930
You said that it took about three years to write this,
376
00:27:07.970 --> 00:27:10.809
and I can believe it because it's so in-depth. And
377
00:27:10.950 --> 00:27:14.609
I just love that every page was a little bit
378
00:27:14.630 --> 00:27:16.190
of a surprise for me when I would turn it.
379
00:27:16.990 --> 00:27:22.809
I'm so glad to hear that because I felt, keep
380
00:27:22.869 --> 00:27:27.150
the reader a little bit on guard but off kilter.
381
00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:32.299
Don't let them settle into this book. So that I
382
00:27:32.359 --> 00:27:35.240
did have a plan that I would be saying one
383
00:27:35.299 --> 00:27:38.559
thing and then I would dart away into something else
384
00:27:38.599 --> 00:27:41.220
that I can see fitting with it but might not
385
00:27:41.849 --> 00:27:46.630
immediately persuade other people that it does. So yeah, there's
386
00:27:46.670 --> 00:27:49.490
a kind of, it's a bit like a movie in
387
00:27:49.509 --> 00:27:53.960
that it keeps cutting something else that fits once you
388
00:27:54.059 --> 00:27:55.599
see the two next to each other.
389
00:27:56.380 --> 00:27:57.440
I think, I hope.
390
00:27:58.200 --> 00:28:02.000
What's a very kind of editor's mindset that you're approaching?
391
00:28:02.819 --> 00:28:03.839
Yes, yes.
392
00:28:04.700 --> 00:28:09.750
Well, you know, I grew up thinking that photography was
393
00:28:09.789 --> 00:28:15.180
the essence of film. And I loved films that let
394
00:28:15.240 --> 00:28:18.990
a shot play out in time, have the camera move.
395
00:28:19.630 --> 00:28:23.450
I love the sort of fluidity of the medium and
396
00:28:23.470 --> 00:28:26.809
the feeling that you were watching a real thing. I
397
00:28:29.529 --> 00:28:34.390
would say now that I think the most decisive effect
398
00:28:34.450 --> 00:28:35.289
of film.
399
00:28:35.109 --> 00:28:35.890
Is the editing.
400
00:28:36.450 --> 00:28:41.720
It's the ability to put two different things together in
401
00:28:41.740 --> 00:28:45.559
a way that gives you a thing that you did
402
00:28:45.579 --> 00:28:46.200
not foresee.
403
00:28:46.920 --> 00:28:50.109
It's like the dissolve in Henry V.
404
00:28:50.279 --> 00:28:56.259
It's like one shot, sleeping boys, and the flames, and
405
00:28:56.299 --> 00:28:59.660
they mesh, and you suddenly get a kind of intellectual,
406
00:29:00.289 --> 00:29:03.990
emotional explosion in your head as you're watching.
407
00:29:04.730 --> 00:29:08.630
I'm so curious as far as, was there one particular
408
00:29:08.650 --> 00:29:14.170
moment or time that really spoke to you to have
409
00:29:14.210 --> 00:29:15.779
you begin writing on this?
410
00:29:16.500 --> 00:29:19.000
You mean in terms of actually doing the book? Yeah.
411
00:29:21.400 --> 00:29:25.440
I thought it was clear to me in advance that
412
00:29:25.559 --> 00:29:28.380
The Godfather was going to be a very important film
413
00:29:28.400 --> 00:29:35.170
because The Godfather is without doubt a masterpiece of a
414
00:29:35.230 --> 00:29:41.880
certain kind of narrative filmmaking. Everything about it is superbly
415
00:29:42.000 --> 00:29:47.200
chosen and composed. At the same time, it had seemed
416
00:29:47.259 --> 00:29:53.500
to me that The Godfather encouraged a kind of male
417
00:29:53.640 --> 00:30:00.519
gang mentality that I dislike intensely. And you know, to
418
00:30:01.660 --> 00:30:06.519
tie things together, seems to me that Donald Trump is
419
00:30:06.599 --> 00:30:09.640
a man who has seen The Godfather far too many
420
00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:14.779
times so that he has absorbed it into his being
421
00:30:14.839 --> 00:30:17.529
and his language and the way he is on camera.
422
00:30:18.349 --> 00:30:22.990
And that is very frightening, I think, because The Godfather
423
00:30:23.109 --> 00:30:27.990
is about dreadful people doing dreadful things, and the process
424
00:30:28.049 --> 00:30:32.710
of movie has made them glamorous, and they should not
425
00:30:32.789 --> 00:30:36.430
be glamorous. So I saw that as being a very
426
00:30:36.490 --> 00:30:40.880
important film in certainly the latter part of this book.
427
00:30:41.160 --> 00:30:45.680
The Godfather is now 50 years old. It's amazing, but
428
00:30:45.720 --> 00:30:48.559
it feels like a film that could have been made yesterday.
429
00:30:48.579 --> 00:30:52.900
A very troubling, disconcerting film.
430
00:30:54.279 --> 00:30:56.710
No, I can definitely see that. And yeah, no, I
431
00:30:57.109 --> 00:31:01.880
very much appreciated that you were not afraid to talk
432
00:31:01.900 --> 00:31:04.640
about trump and and go into that whole arena as
433
00:31:04.700 --> 00:31:07.569
well because who knows what the heck's going to happen
434
00:31:07.589 --> 00:31:09.369
with this it's one of these you know you're talking
435
00:31:09.390 --> 00:31:11.549
about this is a movie and i agree it feels
436
00:31:11.589 --> 00:31:14.450
very
much like a movie a tragedy a comedy all
437
00:31:14.490 --> 00:31:17.569
these things in between a horror film but i can't
438
00:31:17.630 --> 00:31:20.710
see the end i can't normally if i walk into
439
00:31:20.730 --> 00:31:22.650
a film or if i see a trailer i can
440
00:31:23.069 --> 00:31:24.589
pretty much tell you what's going to happen in this
441
00:31:24.650 --> 00:31:26.450
film this one i can't see.
442
00:31:26.319 --> 00:31:29.359
The I agree with you totally, but isn't it one
443
00:31:29.400 --> 00:31:33.700
of the great things about certain movies that after an
444
00:31:33.740 --> 00:31:37.400
hour and 15 minutes or whatever, you say, my God,
445
00:31:37.500 --> 00:31:41.059
how is this going to end?
446
00:31:41.940 --> 00:31:46.289
How indeed? Will its ending be the ending to virtually everything?
447
00:31:46.769 --> 00:31:47.950
Who knows? Who knows?
448
00:31:49.470 --> 00:31:51.410
What were some of the biggest challenges of writing this,
449
00:31:51.490 --> 00:31:54.950
or can you just pump these out now that you've
450
00:31:54.990 --> 00:31:56.769
done dozens of books?
451
00:31:58.750 --> 00:32:03.369
I love writing, and I do not have any trouble writing.
452
00:32:04.089 --> 00:32:07.970
I'm very lucky that I haven't had writer's block for decades.
453
00:32:08.130 --> 00:32:12.519
I did have it in my 20s, 30s, quite a bit.
454
00:32:13.380 --> 00:32:19.420
I can write, but some days what I write may
455
00:32:19.460 --> 00:32:22.740
be good, and then the next day, it's awful.
456
00:32:23.680 --> 00:32:26.640
And I would say the biggest test and challenge.
457
00:32:26.329 --> 00:32:30.769
I feel is knowing which is which and organizing a
458
00:32:31.029 --> 00:32:35.470
book so that you look back at what you wrote
459
00:32:35.869 --> 00:32:39.029
last week, you felt, my God, this is good. And
460
00:32:39.069 --> 00:32:42.130
then this week, you say, no, it's not actually good.
461
00:32:42.809 --> 00:32:46.859
I was going down a wrong side turning then. And
462
00:32:48.400 --> 00:32:51.140
I've got to be brave enough to junk that or
463
00:32:51.180 --> 00:32:52.359
junk most of it.
464
00:32:52.400 --> 00:32:55.710
There's a couple of paragraphs in there that are.
465
00:32:55.690 --> 00:33:01.130
Quite good and that was something I should retrieve and develop.
466
00:33:01.930 --> 00:33:05.069
And I think the biggest test I have in writing
467
00:33:05.250 --> 00:33:12.589
is that sort of organizational thing. It's knowing what will
468
00:33:12.670 --> 00:33:17.089
work and in what order it will work and making
469
00:33:17.170 --> 00:33:18.730
those decisions.
470
00:33:20.430 --> 00:33:22.279
How many books do you work on at a time?
471
00:33:24.970 --> 00:33:31.950
I would say that I frequently will have two or
472
00:33:31.990 --> 00:33:32.910
three books.
473
00:33:32.690 --> 00:33:36.329
In my head. Only one of them at a time
474
00:33:36.410 --> 00:33:43.150
am I really writing. Another one I might be planning,
475
00:33:44.049 --> 00:33:47.970
and another one still I might be regretting that I
476
00:33:48.549 --> 00:33:52.329
made mistakes, which I could go back to. So that,
477
00:33:52.710 --> 00:33:56.410
you know, I would say three books at a time
478
00:33:56.450 --> 00:33:58.490
are in my head. Wow.
479
00:33:59.289 --> 00:34:01.990
Which, actually, I don't think is unusual. I think a
480
00:34:02.029 --> 00:34:04.900
lot of writers would say that.
481
00:34:04.960 --> 00:34:08.320
I mean, often writers say, well, I really have to
482
00:34:08.400 --> 00:34:11.480
concentrate entirely on one thing.
483
00:34:11.820 --> 00:34:13.230
And maybe I.
484
00:34:15.630 --> 00:34:18.989
I always have other things in my head. You know,
485
00:34:19.030 --> 00:34:21.619
just as I have an ongoing life, I have a wife,
486
00:34:21.719 --> 00:34:28.199
I have children, I'm following, I'm getting ready for the 49ers,
487
00:34:28.239 --> 00:34:32.179
having a season. You know, I follow Chelsea Football Club
488
00:34:32.219 --> 00:34:35.510
in England. There's a whole lot of things that occupy
489
00:34:35.550 --> 00:34:43.909
me in a very serious way. And I think concentration
490
00:34:44.010 --> 00:34:47.449
is a precious thing. thing, but it's a luxury I
491
00:34:47.510 --> 00:34:51.449
don't feel suited to. I like to have a lot
492
00:34:51.489 --> 00:34:51.989
going on.
493
00:34:54.849 --> 00:34:57.130
Well, what's next for you? What's the next one that
494
00:34:57.289 --> 00:34:59.210
you're just about ready for?
495
00:34:59.230 --> 00:35:05.829
Well, I'm doing a book now about Mickey Mouse. Oh, wow.
496
00:35:06.670 --> 00:35:11.110
I've never written about animation before, at all. I was
497
00:35:11.210 --> 00:35:14.190
tempted into this by a publisher, and.
498
00:35:15.940 --> 00:35:16.500
We will see.
499
00:35:16.539 --> 00:35:21.750
But it's about Mickey Mouse and about Disney and about
500
00:35:21.829 --> 00:35:25.119
Disneyfication and animation in general.