رونوشت کامل AI Propaganda Goes Viral - Week in Tech

Speaker 2: I have seen the lego videos. 00:06:24 Speaker 4: I was I was, I, I'm glad that you did the reporting because I was wondering the same thing. 00:06:29 Speaker 2: It's like, wait, who is making this? 00:06:31 Speaker 4: And like clearly it's coming from like the Iranian government in some capacity, but like the Ayatola is definitely not good, like are. 00:06:40 Speaker 8: Lego sycrilegiust or something like you know, it's it's there's they're speaking the language that we all speak, right, Like there's a lot of cognitive dissonance there watching the videos. 00:06:50 Speaker 6: That's so interesting that you got that they talk to you about the scripts, because that is what I've been wondering with both like the propaganda legos and then also those low grade fruit corn that is just also populating my feed. I'm just like that there's that and then there's something else. I don't know. I keep sending them to my coworkers, so I might be no, but like everyone has millions and millions, and I was just like, oh my gosh, what if instead of watermarking in some way, you were mandated to put your prompt in any like AI generated thing. I really really want to know like how involved the human was. So that's like super interesting that they that they wrote out these scripts which are so appealing to Americans and so americanized that I was like, is it Ironians? But looks like you answered that question. 00:07:40 Speaker 1: Well, I want to ask that question. I want, I want, I want to ask that question about who's this ready for. But before that, I'm not sure if any of you saw the Chinese one, which is like a mini animated doc with the Great White Eagle, and basically it was the best prima on the straits of Hormus, the underlying geopolitical forces governing that what's going on. I mean, it was, it was. It was an amazing distillation like everything I've read in like you know, smart places in the last couple of weeks, as a six minute animated video with Donald Trump as a great White eagle and the new Ia Toler as a black household cat with red eyes. But like it was very tiny, scripted. I have to say, it was impressive. Information density was very compelling. 00:08:24 Speaker 4: Let's take the let's take the war out of it. Though I know you said this sounds utopian, but it's not. But it kind of is like the imagine unlocking all this creativity that's in like some probably I'm I'm imagining them as like kids, you know, young people in Iran built making these videos who've like, you know, never in their wildest dreams, so they've been able to make something like this and now they can. And you know, of course like there's this is under terrible circumstances, but like in a in another world, it's like they're just you know, they're just making entertaining videos and like, hopefully we have ways to bring this, you know, the good stuff to the top and keep the slop, you know. 00:09:04 Speaker 3: And this is the good stuff. 00:09:05 Speaker 7: Like I'm now I'm imagining like the equivalent of Lonely Island or college humor or whatever, but in AI slop videos. But that's what was kind of striking about the lego videos. I think they look so good, like they're really there's. 00:09:19 Speaker 1: Not really AI slop. Like when I think about AI slop, I think of like a kind of like an octopus with like a cat coming out of it and then going on fire and then living under the sea. 00:09:31 Speaker 2: Is good and the new slop is good, isn't sloppy? 00:09:36 Speaker 7: Yeah, Well, it just struck me that, I mean, almost anyone on the Internet now has access to similar AI models, like whether it's open source or a cloud pro subscription or or what Sea dance, the Chinese video generation model. Anyone can access these and they're proliferating faster every single day, and now anyone can make the leg movie in one day. And I think we're like only starting to imagine the consequences of that. As Reid was saying, it can unlock tons of creativity, but it's also this cognitive dissonance of is this piece of media valuable or meaningful or not? 00:10:16 Speaker 6: Yeah, when you said utopia and like my mind went straight to what about the like click farm equivalents of Like so there's just like, you know, people trapped in an Internet cafe in the Philippines like kind of making individualized propaganda for all of us all day. 00:10:32 Speaker 1: And it's actually just before we come out of this story, and I don't want to ask you about some of your previous reporting on deep fakes and the horm they cause I mean there was obviously the deep fakes non consensual pornography is like it's a horrible story and a horrible issue. There was a fear that deep fakes would also become kind of tools of like political chaos sewing. What seems to have happened is quite the opposite, where in fact, no one really cares about deep faces. In the political realm, people actually want like the most almost absurdist animations which are clearly not trying to be real. I wonder what's going on there. 00:11:05 Speaker 2: Yeah. 00:11:06 Speaker 6: I feel like we started to notice this with elections in the global South. In Southeast Asia, you know that. I know my editors in DC were extremely concerned about like some kind of election manipulation, but instead people ended up using it sort of like oh, you have access to photoshop and like all of a sudden, some a bunch of humanities majors and I don't know, political operatives can do whatever they want. So in India they were like splicing candidates into Bollywood videos and they were making candidates like like sweet cartoony images for like a for a strong man candidate. So I I yeah, I thought it was interesting. Kyle. I'd love to know what you thought about this that it almost seemed to like diffuse the tension. Like there were, of course those videos where you see the bombs heading at the Statue of Liberty, but it felt like it's like we're all in this together with this one crazy. 00:12:04

Speaker 7: I don't know, sort of specifying that the Statue of Liberty in this case is like an evil goat demon ball. Yeahs the ball statues of the Statue of Liberty. But yeah, I think that's like the cartoonishness is the appeal. And I think what brings so many people around the world together with these beautiful videos is their hatred of Donald Trump, and everyone's just in comprehension of what is even going on in this war in the strait of our moves. Is it happening, is it not happening, is it over? Is it just beginning? Literally no one knows, so it might as well be legos. 00:12:40 Speaker 6: I mean, the way that they worked in the like you know Epstein files, is the reason that he started this war was just like you couldn't I mean imagine imagine something like that around the Iraq War. 00:12:51 Speaker 1: In fact, on the Iran on the Iran video I played at the beginning, which we only heard the audio on the ending title of title card on that on that v is actually says Epstein's client, but an attached to changing gears and but staying in the world of film and TV, you were recently featured in a documentary that's got a lot of press called the AI doc or How I became an Apocaloptimist apocaly Optimist, and I want to play a part of Oprah's interview with one of the central voices in that documentary, Aseruskin from the Center for Humane Technology. 00:13:26 Speaker 6: How could AI physically eliminate the human race? 00:13:29 Speaker 5: It's actually hard to imagine all the ways AIS could wipe humans out. AI is already better than almost all humans are doing cyber hacking, and so you could imagine one of the things that an AI could do is take out all electricity, water, hospitals, transportation across every country in the world all at once. Now, that doesn't wipe us all out. Where you could imagine the amount of damage that would do. 00:13:53 Speaker 1: You shouldn't chaos and crazy exactly. 00:13:55 Speaker 5: And we're only you know, five missed meals away from anarchy? 00:13:58 Speaker 3: Did you say, we're only five minus meals away from HANARNT? 00:14:01 Speaker 8: Yeah. 00:14:01 Speaker 5: I think about what happens in New York City if you can't get food. 00:14:04 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't think a lot of people have thought about that. 00:14:08 Speaker 1: Yeah, the soundtrack is particularly dystopian without without any video. But Natija tell us about this this uh, this film on your role in it my role was minuscule. 00:14:19 Speaker 6: I actually finished watching till the end yesterday and I have two sentences, so I would not I would not say I was featured in the in the piece, but yeah, it's. 00:14:28 Speaker 1: You're talking about right, You're you're an expert in the film. 00:14:32 Speaker 6: Yeah, but like for two seconds, there's many men like basically read. You probably have interviewed half the people on it at least or or more, a lot a lot of familiar faces, and it hasn't been doing that well at the box office. It looks like, however, like millions of views for the trailer and the press around it has been They've had people who are on it on the Daily Show this week. This this Brah clip that you just played, it's really actually in the clip when she says like we're five missed meals away from anarchy, they actually show the text like across the across the screen, which I just thought was like wow. And that's the little clip that starts this hour long program too. She talks about like how could AI physically eliminate us all? And I'm just like kind of transported back to twenty twenty three. It's just really interesting to have these conversations about some of these doomstay scenarios that feel very divorced from you know, the current, like some of the very real ways that we're watching chaos unfold. You know, there's nothing about like what if two egomaniacal men are having a contract dispute or you know, what if what if your president is trying to distract from from the Epstein files. Like it just feels like we're kind of back to that, but you know what I mean, like back to that like post chat GPT era of introducing the public to existential risks. 00:16:08 Speaker 1: It's also interesting because Oprah did an ABC special last year with a lot of the same big you know, with Sam Waltman and Dario and all the all the big names in this industry. And when that came out, I was struck by this kind of huge not dissonance is the wrong word, but this huge ocean between how people you know, like you all who cover this industry and how people in Silicon Valley talk and think about what's going on. And then I mean, Oprah is a relatively good gauge for like where the wider conversation is maybe, and so it's just I mean, this does feel like frankly quite dated, and yet at the same time, to your point, it's gain millions of views on YouTube and it's all over Daily Show and the morning shows. Yeah, what's like, who's the who's the movie for? Actually? And what does the marketing of the movie say about it? 00:17:01 Speaker 6: Who's the movie for? I think that the director was trying to make it for the every person who is feeling this like un you know, kind of amorphous anxiety, and the point is to try to figure out how you're supposed to emotionally approach this technology, like how you know you understand that something strange is coming, you don't know what it is, and you don't know what it means for you and your family. And I think, you know, I was trying to think about, like, okay, net net is the documentary better for AI literacy? And I think you do get a better sense of like the initial training phases, you know, they talk a lot about like how much of the Internet is put into it, but then there's like no discussion of the amount of work that the companies do, the amount of product making decisions, the amount of data that they have to commission in order for it to get better and better and it just like kind of removes agency from the companies in this way, like you know, where

it seems inevitable and it's just really interesting having spoken to a lot of the people that were featured in the documentary, like you know, it's not misrepresenting them, but like if you give if you give these people a chance to zoom in on something more concrete and not take the you know, five thousand foot view, they're very chatty and like would have given you an earfull. So I you know, I'm excited for that movie to come out. 00:18:33 Speaker 4: I guess how much do you think it actually helps people with these emotions versus like just sort of like feeds it, you know, just just feeds that sort of like anxiety and fear that people have that I think I think is actually largely irrational, to be honest, You. 00:18:48 Speaker 2: Do what do you? Yeah? 00:18:49 Speaker 1: I do I do with the doom the doom a pond? This will kill us all all that, this will make labor, you know, tremendously strained or which part of it do which part of it do you think is irrational? 00:19:00 Speaker 4: I think I think it's all irrational, to be honest. I mean, we don't know, like the thing is. It's like we're just talking about now. It's like we thought, you know, the defas we're gonna be one thing, and turned out there another thing. We you know, there's gonna be downsides to AI, like to just or let's just call it software automation, right, Like that's what it is. There's gonna be downsides to this, like massive build out of data centers and like reorienting the economy around this thing these tokens, but like we don't really know what that is yet, And I think sitting back and like worrying about it is sort of you know, it's it's like the old cliche. It's like, you know, paying an interest on a debt you may never owe. So that's kind of my view on all this stuff. But I don't know if this documentary you think. I haven't seen it, so I'm just curious, like does it help with that, does it help clarify the situation or does it just sort of like feeding the anxiety more. 00:19:53 Speaker 6: I mean I think that there is I guess like there is room to be concerned and to worry, But it's just so the industry voice like it's basically only asking tech people what could potentially happen. And I feel like, if you want to think about how human civilization has adjusted to massive change, you talk to historians, like you basically talk to almost anybody besides the people who are building the technology. Like he's he's obviously very you know, he does it from a first person perspective, the director, and it's like, you know what, I got to talk to the CEOs and it's like there's no shortage of footage of the CEOs talking about this, like this is it's really not. It's hard to get him to stop yapping in some ways, Like a lot of these guys are on a constant press tour, and I just feel like I would love to hear from people who study labor markets, how you know how change traditionally unfold, Like what are different scenarios in that way of thinking. I just feel like the like the buy that is proposed between like utopia and dystopia, I think we already know like who benefits from that. It's you know, it makes the technology sound inevitable and powerful in a certain way. And it's just we have a lot of data now it's twenty twenty six, Like we can we can look at how successful is this worldview? How successful has this approach been in predicting the harms we've already seen? 00:21:24 Speaker 1: Do they ask you? Did they ask you those kinds of questions during the interview when you would be interviewed for the film, like what was the what was the tenor of what you were being asked to contribute? 00:21:32 Speaker 6: I think I might have been pretty early because I did suggest a lot of people. They did make me explain like effective altruism and like give them the like I remember using my hands a lot for like the Dumer Landscape. And then they had to call me back after Sam was blipped out for a second to ask like what was really going on? Is it because you know, like Q star they had something And I was like no, it's very per very interpers. 00:21:58 Speaker 1: A open AI for like twenty four hours, right yeah. 00:22:01 Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, week or I don't read. You probably remember it better than I a few days. 00:22:05 Speaker 2: I just remember it ruined my Thanksgiving Kyle. 00:22:08 Speaker 1: Have you have you bought your tickets for the movie this weekend? 00:22:10 Speaker 3: I have not bought a ticket yet. 00:22:12 Speaker 7: I have seen it all over social media, like this seems to be the media artifact of AI right now. And it struck me as very vintage, like it's this kind of hyped up dumorus like reel of people saying that this is going to take over the world and destroy things. And I don't know, I feel like the current concerns are less about AI God killing us all and more about the economy redirecting toward data centers and accelerating climate change, and then you know, destroying the earth that way is a kind of secondary effect. 00:22:47 Speaker 3: So yeah, I don't know. 00:22:47 Speaker 7: It felt like a bit of I don't know, super sincere hyping up And as Natasha was talking about, I think the CEOs are incentivized to make this technology appear as powerful and world conquering as possible, and they're not necessarily going to be the best sources for you on how will this affect a normal person? 00:23:07 Speaker 4: And even on the doomsday stuff, I just don't think these it didn't seem like they had much of an imagination there either, Like talk to the have you read you know, if anyone builds it, everyone dies. 00:23:17 Speaker 2: You guys read that book. 00:23:18 Speaker 4: It's like they come out with like much better scenarios for how AI kills us all, Like, you know, it's just like a Zukowsi, Yeah, exactly, like they're They're like, yeah, I mean, it's just going to like co opt humans and eventually of the humans will help them build some bioweapon that we won't even realize we have for like a

generation and eventually we all die. Like it's it's a much you know, Like I feel like, if you're going to go doomsday, like go all the way. 00:23:45 Speaker 2: You know. 00:23:46 Speaker 1: This is why I said that you were a space at the beginning of the episode read because I remember the sci fi you referred to when corporations not controlled by governments can create an extractive economy in space and take people there and then keep them in slaved in space. 00:24:01 Speaker 2: That's right, that's right, like the company from Aliens, Right. 00:24:04 Speaker 3: What if they make alien you know, like that's so much better. 00:24:09 Speaker 4: I mean I asked one of the authors of that book on stage once, like he Nate Sores, and I'm like, what do you think about This was like before the whole, before I broke that whole like Pentagon Anthropics story, but like I was interested in the topic of if autonomous weapons, and I'm like, what do you think of autonomous weapons? And it was like a layup I'm like, he's gonna just say this is so crazy, I can't believe we would ever do this, and he's like, no, I'm pretty much for autonomous weapons, like AI doesn't need autonomous weapons to kill us, and like they could actually help reduce human deaths in the battlefield, and like wow, like that came full circle, Like. 00:24:46 Speaker 1: I read I read Sebastian Amountabie's biography of Demis hasbist this week because he was on the show Sebastian a couple of days ago. And yeah, apparently the way he impressed Elon ear Leon was saying to Elon, by the way, going to space won't save us from superintursient AIS because they'll be able to build rockets too and kill us while we're up there. But just a doubt, just to come out of this story, I want to pick up on a word you use, Kyle, which is sincere, and certainly the documentary comes across as very sincere. However, you know, there is this odd thing where these AI doomers and AI boosters are kind of two sides of the same coin, and the doomers in a sense, okay, maybe they're not becoming billionaires by building AI companies, but they're certainly becoming amongst the most sought after media talking heads in the world, and so like, is it truly in good faith? 00:25:43 Speaker 3: I mean, from my perspective, it's not. 00:25:46 Speaker 7: I think there is a hype cycle and people are caching in on different sides of the hype cycle. Meanwhile, like Anthropic and Open AI are cruising toward IPOs that will make many millionaires and billionaires and that will change things. You know, there are like more eminent consequences I think that we can talk about instead of total dumer apocalypse. 00:26:08 Speaker 6: It's interesting because the whole documentary is about in incentives and you're not, like, there's very little examination of the incentives of the people that got the most airtime. And I think there is this sense that it's just it's hard to operate in AI, like writing about AI without kind of knowing where everybody

is coming from. You kind of have to have this map in your head because I think it looks like there are many different voices saying the same thing, and so there is consensus, but you know, many of those people are from policy groups that are trying to influence legislators towards a specific view, like they share a lot of similarity. So you know, I just I wish we would move away from from looking at a person's like kind of personal politics and just look at like the CEO's actions A and then for these kind of advocates, look at you know, where they're coming from. You know, if they're giving you a blackmail scenario from the anthropic paper, to what end and how does that like reframe how you think about what policies to put forward. Because this is aimed at policymakers, I think we should think about it as its own kind of propaganda. 00:27:32 Speaker 1: That's a really interesting point you make, because obviously in the Trump era, it's sort of tempting to think, well, like the train has left the station, they'll never be regulation, Like we've just like essentially decided that there's going to be unlimited, unregulated technology. But of course, like you know, there's midterms coming up this year, there's two years time there's another presidential election, and so are you suggesting in some sense this is kind of building towards a co of a policy driven tech lash post election. 00:28:04 Speaker 6: Or yes, I mean this is you know, like some of the people who are represented there, they are affiliated with groups who are arguing that there is massive bipartisan support for a long list of legislation. I wouldn't say it's like a crisp kind of policy proposal, but you know, they're meeting together with faith groups, with children's advocacy groups, with unions and saying like we all have common cause in regulating in regulating AI. So I just think that this is the tip of the spear, and we should pay attention to where these where these narratives are pointing government, and where these narratives might end up affecting all of us. 00:28:52 Speaker 1: We're going to take a short break now before we come back to celebrate Apple's fiftieth birthday by asking what comes next for the second largest company in America. Welcome back to tech stuff. Read is kind of incredible. Apple's been around for fifty years. I mean it started just after the original Moon landings, which is kind of crazy to think about. Wednesday, April first, Apple celebrated this milestone by putting on a statement titled fifty years of Thinking Different and amidst the praise of misfits, rebels, and troublemakers, there is a telling quote at Apple, We're more focused on building tomorrow than remembering yesterday. What does that mean? 00:29:46 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean usually when you turn fifty in silicon value, you don't tell anybody, like you try to keep it a secret. 00:29:51 Speaker 2: But that was looks mixing. It's kind of interesting. 00:29:56 Speaker 4: No, I think I think there's there's a fascinating, fascinating happening with Apple right now where they basically missed AI. 00:30:05 Speaker 2: Right. 00:30:05 Speaker 4: They're sort of like they were they were caught. You know, I don't I don't know how that happened, but they didn't see this revolution happening. I think had something to do with being in Kooper Tino inside this like spaceship building and not going outside and the future right. But I but I think that like the defense of Apple from from the Apple fanboy crowd, which they're you know, they're very their many, and I'll probably get hate mail for even saying this, but it's like, you know, look they've yeah, I mean, Apple's great at this. They just watch technology develop and then they just jump on top of it and like and and you know, and benefit from it. And I think that's like a very lazy defense of of what's happening, and it's and the other thing is like, well, you've got this phone, and you know they're gonna just like that, They're gonna be able to run all these AI models on the device, and so that's going to be a huge advantage for Apple. And it's like, I don't think that's really how it's gonna work. I mean, I can't, I don't. It never helps in the tech industry to like miss a technology wave like we've seen companies do it. I'm not saying Apple's gonna disappear overnight or anything like that, but you know, like the reason people buy iPhones is not because it has some great hardware or is a piece of great hardware. 00:31:18 Speaker 2: It's because they're locked into the ecosystem, right. It's it's they. 00:31:21 Speaker 4: Don't want to be a green bubble or name your you know, the photo sharing product or something like that. But you know, Apple doesn't know what the like, we don't know what the on device like, what the edge compute's going to look like. That's necessary to make you know, whatever this future on device AI is. And Apple can't move very quickly with its phones because it sells so many of them, so like when it comes to like new hardware, that's why they're always like many years behind Samsung on the hardware because Samsung doesn't have as big of an install based so they don't need to sell you know, millions and millions of these things immediately when they come out with a new product. So it's gonna be really, really hard. I think for Apple too, you know, the next fifty years, I think, I think might be tough. 00:32:04 Speaker 1: I can see Kyle. I can see Kyle smiling, and I think he might be drafting some hate mail. Yeah. 00:32:08 Speaker 7: I was just remembering the recent marketing campaigns for the latest iPhone models, and they just all promised various AI functionality and just did not deliver on it at all. 00:32:19 Speaker 3: Like I when I bought. 00:32:20 Speaker 7: My most recent iPhone, I kind of knew the AI was not going to come through, Like that was the messaging and the tech community at least, but the public didn't know that. And it just seems kind of

embarrassing for the company that they are missing their own goals, like they're missing their stated aims with their AI functionality. So, I don't know, it doesn't look like strategy from the outside. 00:32:42 Speaker 1: You don't think there's anything the consumers like. For example, we just talked about that movie, right, and the kind of AI doomerism. There's no argument that perhaps from a consumer point of view, like having a technology company that is not emotionally associated with AI and doom maybe an interesting thing. I mean it was. It was interesting too. Cook in that letter didn't mention the words AI lartificial intelligence once. I mean, this is a tech ce or letter in twenty twenty six. That kind of been an oversight. I mean that must have been a decision. 00:33:09 Speaker 4: Well, look AI. The thing is we should stop calling it AI. I know that's not gonna happen. But you know, it's software, okay, Like it's like saying I hate software, Like okay, fine, Like and there could be like an anti software lobby and everybody lobbies. But like, you know, when you have a product that can just like do stuff for you and save you a bunch of time and is like very useful, like you're just going to use it, right, that's just how the world works. Like I'm sorry, nobody's going to be like I'm morally opposed to this software that's like, you know, allowing me to spend more time with my kids. Like it's just, you know, it's just kind of a silly concept. 00:33:43 Speaker 7: I found it kind of interesting just to jump in the wave of new devices coming out for AI. The little gadgets and dependance and stuff. They all look like Apple products, Like the vocabulary is so apply, the graphic design is apply. The whole vibe comes from Apple. But Apple is like not anywhere. 00:34:04 Speaker 1: And Jon who designed the iPhone, is working on. 00:34:07 Speaker 4: AI, so like, and why are those products coming out? Right, It's because the iPhone can't. You can't do what you want to do on the iPhone. They won't let you. 00:34:17 Speaker 7: I'm just waiting for the real AI Tamagatschi. That's my dream. I can't wait. It needs to happen. 00:34:25 Speaker 6: Wait read. But if we're locked in because it's a closed ecosystem, doesn't that give them this at least, like it buys them time to just come in when you know when it's not AI AI, it is, here's your useful assistant. Like I don't know some of these some of these companies, right like fifty years they've had they've been able to parlay their like consumer lock in from across a generation. 00:34:50 Speaker 4: So yeah, like Expinity for instance, right, like they will continue to exist, Like I'm not arguing against that at all, Like I think Apple will go on for a long time. Like this isn't This isn't an argument that like Apple's going to implode and disappear. But it's like it's like Microsoft when they missed you know, I don't know, they miss search and then Mobile, like it's it's Microsoft still there. It's still a

very valuable company, but like not as as relevant and it went through some dark times. Maybe you know, maybe they can make a recovery or something like that, but I think it will be dark times for Apple. It's not going to have the same, you know, the same relevance as as it used to once this stuff starts to take off. And I'm not an expert on the timelines, like this could take this could take several years. But but the writing's on the wall. 00:35:37 Speaker 2: That's all. That's my argument. 00:35:39 Speaker 1: I also think I also take take a little bit of you know, disagree slightly with you read that the people done by Apple because of the product, Like I agree, the ecosystem looking is very powerful, but also like I was an Android user for many years and I bult an iPhone. I was like, wow, this is just a lot better. I'm not going to get another Android, And I recently lost my airports when I was traveling and I was like, I don't know about one hundred and fifty dollars for airports. I'm going to get fake copied one on Amazon for thirty bucks. I was like put them in and I was like, I. 00:36:04 Speaker 4: Thought, look, I have I have AirPods in my ear. I have an iPhone sitting actually I have like three iPhones sitting on my. 00:36:11 Speaker 2: Dead like I'm on a mat computer. 00:36:14 Speaker 4: Like this is I totally get that, Like it's a great consumer experience, like this is not like this is not me being like I hate Apple and I won't buy anything by Apple, Like no, people, It's a really nice consumer experience, like it all, it all works really well together. But I'm just looking into the future. I'm like, this is not like this idea of like opening up an app and like using it like which we all do today is not the future. Like that is not how like I'm not opening up a banking app and like transferring funds and stuff. I'm just gonna tell an AI agent to do that, and you can do that today with you know, open claw. That's very early adopter technology, but like a glimpse into the future again, and I can tell a chatbot like go, you know, transfer some funds on a bank, Go book me a flight, right and without ever opening an app, and all that's happening outside the mobile ecosystem. And that's that's kind of where it's heading. And it just makes that the thing that Apple built that nice, like very nice consumer experience, like it's not as important anymore. It's it's going to be sort of like there. I don't think there's a walled garden, at least I hope not, because I think it would be bad for consumers. Like, I don't think there's like a walled garden approach to that. 00:37:23 Speaker 7: It feels like everyone's jostling for control of the new interface, like what are we going to use to interface with our AI agents and our open clause and whatever. And you know, Johnny Ive and open ai are trying to do that with some pendant thing that sits on your desk plus the thing that goes in your pocket. There's been all sorts of little experiments and different trials. I feel like there's more opportunity right now for some other company to take this away from Apple and to come up with something else. And I was just recalling how Apple is kind of bailed on its other innovative hardware projects, like there is no TV, there is no car, and the new possible CEO who people talk about John Turnus. He's a hardware engineering guy. Like, it's not clear where it's going. 00:38:11 Speaker 6: Did you guys see that picture of Joe Gebbia from Airbnb with like what looked like the new device. I mean I still want my If that's the new device, I will keep my phone. You know, like you are saying, Kyle, it's so derivative of early Apple. So yeah, I see what you're saying. I guess, like, and I don't even know why I'm defending Apple's hard I guess I like that Tim Cook didn't put AI in his letter because it is meaningless. Like you, if you're thinking about like how to give people real utility, you don't need to get like there is a chance that you could just come in on the back end. I mean, fifty year old companies have a very hard time innovating. 00:38:52 Speaker 4: I think the new interface that you're talking about his voice right, Like that's what that's I mean, it won't be all voice, but like you know, that's how we're to control this stuff. 00:39:00 Speaker 6: Don't you think, yeah, but what is this big pebble, this big pebble. I'm not going to carry around a big pebble. 00:39:07 Speaker 2: Like you're gonna have to. 00:39:09 Speaker 4: We're gonna have to have some device, right because you're gonna want some screen occasionally look at something visual or you know, maybe it's in a glass as well. I think that technology is like really far away that. 00:39:20 Speaker 6: They'll consult more women as they're doing this, because they did not for VR and. 00:39:27 Speaker 7: A Imagchi all the way. So we've we've been here before. There's the Pokemon version, there's the digimon little thing. 00:39:35 Speaker 3: It's gonna be great. 00:39:39 Speaker 6: Yeah. I was just gonna say, because I can picture how to carry it around like that big pebble, I was like, where am I going to put it? It's going to be at the bottom of my back? 00:39:46 Speaker 1: Who has the inside scoop on the on the CEO succession is Tim Cook? What are you going to go this year? 00:39:51 Speaker 6: Oh? 00:39:51 Speaker 2: I don't know. 00:39:52 Speaker 4: I mean, I I just I'm not like deep in the in the company anymore, so I would just be guessing. But I mean for sure, like it's the end of Tim Cook's you know, career, and that's that's apparent right, Like when exactly that happened, I don't know, but but yeah, like what I I think it's like there's every every it seems like every six months there's like a new successor a new name that comes out. And he's like, yeah, like none of it's like super exciting. You're like, could we get Steve jobs? Like is he available to? 00:40:22 Speaker 1: Like I just Adam Newman might be looking for a job.

00:40:25 Speaker 4: If maybe Adam Newman like I don't know, like something exciting that like maybe that's not good. Maybe Apple doesn't want someone exciting. Maybe the best thing is to be like Comcast or you know whatever and just like ride ride it out as long as possible. 00:40:38 Speaker 1: Would you when you when they would dooin transition from jobs to cook it was from the vision to reach the technic crawt. It's hard to go from the technic crat to a new visionary, right, You're kind of you're locked in at that point a little bit. 00:40:47 Speaker 3: Yeah, for sure, we knew Johnson Huang and his leather jacket. You know. 00:40:54 Speaker 1: Well, that's all we have time for today. But I want to end with a quick round robin who had the best and worst we can tech? I'm gonna go first. I think anthropic we always want to either the best of the week or the worst. I think it's the worst this week with the leak of that code. Interesting, what do you think read? 00:41:10 Speaker 3: Well? 00:41:11 Speaker 4: I thought, I mean the word like Oracle laying off like, you know, a huge chunk of their whole company was like, has got to be a really bad, bad week for Oracle. And it's all because well again, like people will say, like, oh, the AI, it's taking our jobs, and it's like, well, actually it looks a little different, right. It's it's like, well, they need to invest a huge amount of money in AI. They don't really have the cash, and so they're just like looking in the couch cushions and it's like, yeah, laying off a bunch of employees is okay, that's going to get us like a little bit closer to what we need to invest in this whole thing. 00:41:46 Speaker 1: And it's like just a general sixty minutes. 00:41:50 Speaker 4: Right exactly so six So it's like, I mean, I don't know, this is like how we don't really know how AI is going to like affect the world. It's like all these people just lost their jobs because of AI, but not because AI took their jobs right, and I think it's a bad week for Oracle, But also like that is to me just a good example of what we were talking about earlier. 00:42:13 Speaker 7: On that note, I was going to say the worst week in tech was for journalists because of this whole AI journalism discourse. To Bockl, whatever should we use AI and writing like, I think the answer is that it's going to happen, and we're just kind of adapting to this new situation. And at the same time, one of the controversies was that this New York Times book reviewer who's a British novelist used AI. He said to expand a book review draft, he couldn't hit his thousand word mark, which is crazy, and so he used AI and he was caught kind of plagiarizing via AI. And my question is just who are you, as a British novelist to not even finish a novel review of a thousand words like. 00:43:01 Speaker 1: And this kicked off a bigger journalism and Natasha, I want to know your thoughts on cloud code. But also if you, I mean, we've got a couple of we've got three worsts of the week. I think hopefully you can bring us the best of the week. 00:43:12 Speaker 6: Oh, I have another worst of the week. I was gonna say Mercore. Mercore is is the company that does you know it kind of it hires those like PhDs in biochemistry to create data that goes to the big frontier labs to to put the PhDs in biochemistry out of business. And they had this massive, massive leak. They had video interviews with with individuals. They have so many clients and I feel like we're just starting to get a sense of where is that data going to go? You know, does this mean it's like out on the internet and everybody will have access to this like top tier post training data. That one. That one is like I'm not usually that interested in CyberSecure, but I really want to see where this one goes. 00:44:01 Speaker 1: And how does that relate is it? It's a separate story to the clawed leak, but just tell us a little bit about that before regard. 00:44:07 Speaker 6: Yeah, the cloud leak is I think is spiritually very different because you already have that a lot of that code on your computer, so it wasn't as I mean, it was like illuminating for people, but this is like proprietary information that they owed to their customers, and you know, there was no way that they wanted even a smidge of this to get out. 00:44:31 Speaker 1: Okay, I have a best of the week the guy from medv or Medvi who created the first unicorn of two, him and his brother their first billion dollar run rate company selling GLP ones and via great on the internet. 00:44:45 Speaker 7: It's a thing like they're just doing the marketing and talking to patients. 00:44:51 Speaker 1: And I think I think that they're connect somehow, connecting patients and doctors in a quicker way than it is otherwise possible to bypass. Field Fashion and prescription. 00:45:01 Speaker 6: Kill Mill is the first billion dollar one person, two person company. 00:45:06 Speaker 2: It wasn't born, you know. 00:45:09 Speaker 6: I mean, there's. 00:45:11 Speaker 2: Something no but it's just it's just boring. 00:45:14 Speaker 4: I'm just saying that was like what it was like web one point out, like let's do something different. 00:45:18 Speaker 1: You know, he has a digital avatar of himself to deal with his day's day life as well. The founders that he's already going all in on the on the on the AI moment. 00:45:26 Speaker 2: He should be a go ahead read can I thro? I mean we said it earlier. 00:45:31 Speaker 4: I mean I think SpaceX right, it's gonna be the largest I P o ever, right, they they filed confidentially this week, right, I mean that's like, you know, you gotta get a handle to them. That's pretty and you know, and also just people are talking about space a lot, right, You've got the Artemist launch, You've got the Project Hill Mary movie. 00:45:51 Speaker 1: You know, I feel likensha not such a space stun. 00:45:56 Speaker 3: Can go to spaces going to space. 00:45:59 Speaker 2: I I just wish, I. 00:46:03 Speaker 6: Wish people would read more Octavia Butler if they're thinking about space rather than you know, like what is he like Robert Heinleine. Uh, I'm very curious to look at the space X I p O. Because I think we're going to have some like oracle type moving stuff around in order to pay for those data centers. And you know, it's just been rolling up and rolling up companies into right like x into Xai, x Ai into is it into SpaceX now? 00:46:35 Speaker 4: And I'm like blinking, well, it's going to be well, well it's yeah, but it's going to be it is SpaceX, but it's going to be Tesla. 00:46:43 Speaker 2: It's going to be elon KRK. Right, That's that's the plan. 00:46:46 Speaker 4: They go public and then they'll they'll join with Tesla in some capacity, and you're just. 00:46:52 Speaker 6: You're just I mean, we do think there's a chance that if people look at the at the numbers that like, he's an incredible showman for for stockholders, right, So do you think some of that will change if we see the numbers? 00:47:06 Speaker 4: I mean, I think you just have to ask retail investors what they think. I think, and I think the answer is like we love the Elon, right, I mean that's people just he is the I mean, he is the Steve Jobs of our day, right, like people, He's got the he can convince people of anything. You know, you can tell a story about space data centers and humanoid robots and all that, and I think you know it's it's that formula still works, right, I mean. 00:47:34 Speaker 1: Kyle is eating the Steve Jobs of our age. 00:47:38 Speaker 7: Oh man, I mean Steve Jobs was not sending us to space. He could be like the Thomas Edison or whatever, like the if not the pure inventor, then at least the showman who can trust all of this stuff up for public consumption. Speaking of space, though, I also want to add my best of the week, which is a Nintime Do and Super Mario Galaxy Odyssey whatever, which seems to be a rousing success for children everywhere. 00:48:10 Speaker 4: You know, my kids are going to the movie later later today, so yeah, they had. 00:48:15 Speaker 1: It's a hard choice between am Ai apocaly Optimist and Mary mary Win Space movie. I guess for your kids. 00:48:23 Speaker 4: I haven't even seen Project Tail there yet, so that's the the apocal apocaal Optimist is gonna have to wait for me. 00:48:33 Speaker 3: In it. 00:48:33 Speaker 1: That's thank you. 00:48:37 Speaker 3: All, thanks for having us. 00:48:39 Speaker 2: That was fun. 00:48:54 Speaker 1: For tech stuff. I'm was for Locian. This episode was produced by Elizah Dennis and Melissa Slaughter. Executive produced by me Julian Nutter and Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katria Norvel for iHeart Podcasts. Jack Insley mixed this episode and Kyle Murdoch wrote our theme song special thank you to you read Kyle and Natasha. Please check out all three of these incredible journalists work, and we're very lucky to call them friends of the pod.