رونوشت 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.479
He frames! It is Rupert Sala.
00:00:02.879 --> 00:00:07.280
We luckle bouncella of misunderstood jawnista football.
00:00:07.679 --> 00:00:11.839
It's a holistic, skillful, and elaptic journey to better management.
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:23.760
Welkom to ProK Sala! I'm your host Jani Sarajarvi, and this is part two of our space and time relative time.
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:38.320
Last week we were talking about the way football usually talks about space and time, a meter of space, two seconds on the ball, and this is borrowed from physics, and that it misses what the great players actually live inside.
00:00:38.479 --> 00:00:46.560
We leaned on Robin's 2023 paper and on Bergson's old idea of duration to begin naming an alternative.
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:52.719
Maki Ahawa's example in ice hockey and the divers turning one second into two.
00:00:53.119 --> 00:00:56.000
So this week we go into perception itself.
00:00:56.479 --> 00:01:08.400
What it maybe actually is, and if it's not kind of a snapshot of something or internal kind of computer ism, then what it is, maybe.
00:01:15.280 --> 00:01:19.840
So if you missed part 1, go back for it because it's it's based for this episode.
00:01:20.079 --> 00:01:20.879
Let's go.
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:33.760
So if Makiho is not blessed with a different clock, if they live inside a richer duration, then what's actually happening in their in his perception that lets him do it?
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:43.280
So what's perceptual act itself and why why this is different for for the skillful player and the unskillful player?
00:01:43.519 --> 00:01:47.280
Let's start with a sentence we have all heard from coaches.
00:01:47.519 --> 00:01:49.439
Take a picture of the situation.
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:50.640
Take a picture.
00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:54.319
And this sentence comes from the right instinct basically.
00:01:54.480 --> 00:01:57.760
We want the player to see the whole field before deciding.
00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:03.280
We want their head up, we want them to notice the free teammate for example on the other side.
00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:09.199
But I feel that as a description of what perception actually is, this is wrong.
00:02:09.360 --> 00:02:13.439
And maybe it also matters, let's see, during this episode.
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:28.960
Because if perception were snapshot taking and then stitching snapshots into a sequence, basically then the bad defender, frantic defender from last week who was losing this 1v1, would be kind of equipped.
00:02:29.199 --> 00:02:35.680
They see every frame, but the idea is this that what they are missing is not a frame.
00:02:35.919 --> 00:02:38.080
What they are missing is the flow.
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:40.080
And these are two different things.
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:45.919
The bad defender is not short of pictures, the bad defender is short of duration.
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:47.919
And what does this then mean?
00:02:48.159 --> 00:02:54.000
Let me come at this through Gibson one more time because he said it very nicely in 1966 book.
00:02:54.400 --> 00:03:00.159
So Gibson pointed out that the whole way we usually divide experience into perception and memory.
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:05.759
Perception is about the present, memory is about the past, is an introspective distinction.
00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:12.400
It feels true from the inside, but it's not true at the level of what is actually happening for him.
00:03:12.639 --> 00:03:20.560
And he said roughly that information doesn't exist exclusively in the present as distinct from the past or the future.
00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:38.719
So the stream of consciousness, as William James described it, the travelling moment of now, with a past extending backward and future extending forward, is a description of self-consciousness, Gibson said, not of the process of perception.
00:03:38.960 --> 00:03:41.680
So the process of perception for him is different.
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:49.199
The process of perception deals in successive order, motion, event, episode, whole sequence.
00:03:49.439 --> 00:04:14.159
We don't perceive a parade of frozen instants and then combine them in a head, but we perceive the motion, the ball flying, or in one V1, the whole dynamic of the situation, the relative speeds of the players, the angle between the defender and striker, the teammates running in behind, and these are not kind of instants, they are events.
00:04:14.479 --> 00:04:18.720
So where does the snapshot picture come from?
00:04:18.959 --> 00:04:24.480
It comes from the same classical metaphysic we took a little bit apart last week.
00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:34.959
If space is an abstract continuum of points and time is a parade of instants, then of course perception has to be constructed out of static elements.
00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:40.240
The frames would be the real things and perception would be the glueing.
00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:55.279
But if the field we live inside is actually a continuously transforming reality per Bergson's duration, then perception doesn't have to construct anything out of frozen pieces, and perception is already in the flow.
00:04:55.519 --> 00:05:01.279
And Robbins in his 2023 paper reaches for an image to describe this.
00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:08.639
Bergson's picture of reality as Robbins is reading it is a continuously transforming field.
00:05:08.879 --> 00:05:20.560
The brain in that picture is not a container generating experience from the inside, like a projector showing a movie to someone sitting in a cinema in your skull.
00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:25.360
The brain is a resonant wave embedded in the transformation itself.
00:05:25.759 --> 00:05:40.399
The brain or the whole body picks up or more exactly is specific to the invariant structure of the environmental event because the brain or body is itself part of the field, time extended like the field.
00:05:40.560 --> 00:05:56.800
So when Makiho reads an
Load full transcript
incoming Forcheck, there is not little Makiho sitting inside his school watching a screen, but the whole of Makiho, the body, the whole body is coupled to the whole of the incoming Forcheck as one unfolding event.
00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:06.560
So the brain is not generating the perception from the inside, but the brain is resonating, it's kind of going outside and resonating with what is already out there.
00:06:06.879 --> 00:06:12.399
And this is where Robins has, I feel, similarities to Vicente Raha.
00:06:12.560 --> 00:06:24.160
And Raha's work on resonance, which we spent a whole episode on earlier this year, and we were also interviewing Vicente, says kind of similar thing but from different angles, I feel.
00:06:24.399 --> 00:06:28.079
So the player together with the environment is one coupled system.
00:06:28.240 --> 00:06:32.160
Being tuned to the game is a measurable property of that coupling.
00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:34.000
It's not only a metaphor.
00:06:34.240 --> 00:06:40.319
Resonance in Raha and resonance in Gibson are two kind of labels for the same phenomenon.
00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:45.439
So the organism and the environment are co-specifying each other in motion.
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:54.160
And because perception is time extended, there is no clean dividing line between the per perception ends and memory begins.
00:06:54.399 --> 00:07:00.160
The just past of the current moment is still live inside the perception of the current moment.
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:04.639
It has not yet fallen into some archive of the mind, it's still present.
00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:08.720
And Berkson wrote this, and this is really really nice.
00:07:08.959 --> 00:07:12.560
Perception he said is always already a memory.
00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:17.680
Makia reading the force forcheck does not perceive instant A.
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:23.040
Stor it, perceive instant B, retrieve instant A, combine them and then act.
00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:34.639
He perceives the force check as a motion, as an unfolding event with its own just past and its own not yet, all of it present inside the current act of perceiving.
00:07:34.879 --> 00:07:39.600
So there is a continuous attunement to the shape of the thing as it unfolds.
00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:42.160
And this is important for a coach.
00:07:42.399 --> 00:07:46.800
The subset of the field our perception picks out is not neutral.
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:50.240
We don't perceive everything and equally.
00:07:50.480 --> 00:07:54.480
We perceive the subset that is relevant to our possible action.
00:07:54.720 --> 00:08:01.519
The gap between two defenders that this particular body with this particular skill set can pass through.
00:08:01.680 --> 00:08:10.480
The space behind the fullback that this particular runner can reach, the deception that this particular opponent will fall for.
00:08:10.639 --> 00:08:19.439
And Bergson was kind of saying that perception is virtual action, and this is related to Afrodances, I feel.
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:22.560
We are seeing or feeling how we can act.
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:33.279
So if you have been listening to this podcast for a while, the ecological psychology concept of Afrodans, what the environment affords us, Gibson's famous idea.
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:42.879
And now shown to be the same kind of at least kind of same insight Bergson had a century earlier, but in a little bit different language.
00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:46.480
Virtual action in Bergson, Afrodans in Gibson.
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:51.679
And for Maki Aho, the Ice doesn't present a mutual configuration of players and spaces.
00:08:51.840 --> 00:09:03.600
The Ice presents a set of invitations to act, each one scaled to his particular body and his particular skills, and continuously shifting as the game shifts.
00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:07.759
He's seeing or feeling the game he can play.
00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:11.679
The player next to him sees the game they can play together.
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:15.679
And this is based for synergies and cooperation.
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:25.200
When we think about cinema, cinema has been really, or some directors have been really skillful in this idea.
00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:29.519
Andrei Tarkovsky wrote a book called Sculpting in Time.
00:09:29.759 --> 00:09:36.000
His argument about what cinema actually is turns out to meet Bergson and Gibson quite nicely.
00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:42.879
Tarkovsky said that cinema's unique art is not montage, it's not image, it is not story even.
00:09:43.279 --> 00:09:46.159
Cinema's unique art is time itself.
00:09:46.559 --> 00:09:56.159
The long take, the quiet shot that's not cut, the camera that stays with the field while the field keeps transforming.
00:09:56.320 --> 00:10:02.159
And that Tarkovsky said is what cinema can do that no other art form can.
00:10:02.559 --> 00:10:04.559
Film gives the viewer time.
00:10:04.799 --> 00:10:08.639
Actually live time, shaped or sculpted.
00:10:09.440 --> 00:10:24.720
If you have ever watched Stalker or Andrey Ruplev or any of his films and felt the field around you slow down, you have been living maybe briefly inside Bergson's duration, a filmmaker's duration built on purpose.
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:34.559
Tarkovsky was not calling this thing duration or resonance or something like this, but he was talking about sculpting in time.
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:50.000
Good football match is like a Tarkovsky film with 22 authors, something you as a player or coach or a fan can be inside in duration together with a stadium full of people.
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:52.320
Again back to Makiho.
00:10:52.559 --> 00:11:02.720
He's not stitching snapshots, he's not making snapshot images of the field, he's not running internal simulations of future positions.
00:11:03.039 --> 00:11:08.320
He's embedded as resonant waves in the transforming field of the game.
00:11:08.559 --> 00:11:11.200
His perception is virtual action.
00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:21.039
He sees what the environment is affording him right now in a duration that still carries the just past and reaches into the not yet.
00:11:21.279 --> 00:11:27.360
He don't have more clock time, he's more deeply incited duration than the opponents are.
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:43.759
So Bergson, William James, Gibson, Listo Taut Theory, Arauch's ecological cognition, Rachas Rosonans, Robbins pulling the whole thread together and similar things.
00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:48.879
The brain doesn't live inside the physics space time we got from Newton.
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:54.000
It lives inside the duration and extensity that Persson described.
00:11:54.159 --> 00:12:08.720
And when we try to coach as if physics space time is the real territory, is the real thing, we end up with players who look at the pitch like it is a diagram and get beaten by players who are inside the duration of it.
00:12:08.960 --> 00:12:11.360
And same applies for coaches.
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:21.279
In the end, Robbins writes essentially that time and space are concepts, intellectual achievements, not perceptual categories.
00:12:21.519 --> 00:12:25.120
The brain doesn't dwell in the world of the classical metaphysic.
00:12:25.440 --> 00:12:31.360
The brain or body, mind don't dwell in the world of the classical metaphysic.
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:35.919
It is a mistake, he says, to exalt the metaphysic into a reality.
00:12:36.080 --> 00:12:52.799
It is a mistake to confuse the abstract space we build with our thinking for the temporal reality of that indivisibly transforming field in which the mind, brain, body is actually embedded and in fact dwells.
00:12:53.039 --> 00:12:57.440
One quick note Professor Book being translated into English.
00:12:59.440 --> 00:13:00.559
Until next Tuesday.