رونوشت 🔗
1
00:00:00,557 --> 00:00:03,140
(upbeat music)
2
00:00:05,430 --> 00:00:09,090
- Welcome to another episode
of "Supply Chain Frontiers,"
3
00:00:09,090 --> 00:00:12,630
the MIT CTL podcast where
we explore the trends,
4
00:00:12,630 --> 00:00:14,640
technologies, and innovations
5
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,220
shaping the future of
supply chain management.
6
00:00:17,220 --> 00:00:19,440
I'm your host, Mackenzie Berry.
7
00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:21,900
Today, we're taking
you to a live recording
8
00:00:21,900 --> 00:00:25,020
during Climate Week New York City 2026,
9
00:00:25,020 --> 00:00:28,260
where the MIT Sustainable
Supply Chain Lab hosted a panel
10
00:00:28,260 --> 00:00:30,600
of researchers and industry leaders
11
00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:32,857
to discuss the latest
findings from the annual
12
00:00:32,857 --> 00:00:35,640
"State of Supply Chain
Sustainability Report."
13
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:38,640
Joining us are Dr. Sreedevi Rajagopalan,
14
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:40,980
director of the Sustainable
Supply Chain Lab,
15
00:00:40,980 --> 00:00:43,740
along with Rachel
Schwalbach of C.H. Robinson,
16
00:00:43,740 --> 00:00:46,740
Philippine de T'Serclaes
of Dassault Systemes,
17
00:00:46,740 --> 00:00:49,590
Severine Perrin of CO2 AI,
18
00:00:49,590 --> 00:00:51,660
and Heather Ewing of Breakthrough.
19
00:00:51,660 --> 00:00:53,250
Together, they discuss how companies
20
00:00:53,250 --> 00:00:57,330
are navigating sustainability
amid geopolitical uncertainty,
21
00:00:57,330 --> 00:00:59,760
the rise of AI, and continued efforts
22
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:01,623
to decarbonize supply chains.
23
00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:04,680
- Good morning, everyone.
24
00:01:04,680 --> 00:01:06,120
Welcome to the launch
25
00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:10,560
of the 2026 "State of Supply
Chain Sustainability Report"
26
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,440
from the MIT Sustainable Supply Chain Lab.
27
00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:14,610
My name is Sreedevi.
28
00:01:14,610 --> 00:01:15,930
I am a research scientist
29
00:01:15,930 --> 00:01:18,750
at the MIT Center for
Transportation Logistics
30
00:01:18,750 --> 00:01:22,140
and director of the MIT
Sustainable Supply Chain Lab.
31
00:01:22,140 --> 00:01:24,000
I will take the next few minutes
32
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:26,040
to walk you through
some of the key findings
33
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,080
of the report this year,
34
00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:30,870
and then we'll move on
to the panel discussion
35
00:01:30,870 --> 00:01:32,580
with our esteemed panelists,
36
00:01:32,580 --> 00:01:34,380
and we will see
37
00:01:34,380 --> 00:01:37,650
what those findings
actually mean in practice.
38
00:01:37,650 --> 00:01:40,387
So the title of the report this year is
39
00:01:40,387 --> 00:01:42,480
"Sustainability Under Pressure:
40
00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:46,200
AI, Geopolitics, and the Path Forward."
41
00:01:46,200 --> 00:01:47,370
And if you look at the title,
42
00:01:47,370 --> 00:01:50,400
it pretty much drives the central tension
43
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,040
that we see in this year's report,
44
00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:55,920
which is sustainability
commitments remain strong,
45
00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:58,200
but companies are finding
it really difficult
46
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,000
to deliver on those commitments
47
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:01,950
because of the difficult environment
48
00:02:01,950 --> 00:02:04,860
they have been operating
in that could be attributed
49
00:02:04,860 --> 00:02:08,430
to the changing geopolitical landscape,
50
00:02:08,430 --> 00:02:10,800
the rising advances in AI,
51
00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,640
and the ever-growing challenges
52
00:02:14,640 --> 00:02:17,580
of decarbonizing the
physical supply chain.
53
00:02:17,580 --> 00:02:19,590
This research wouldn't have been possible
54
00:02:19,590 --> 00:02:22,710
without the generous
support of our sponsors,
55
00:02:22,710 --> 00:02:25,770
our corporate sponsor,
C.H. Robinson Foundation,
56
00:02:25,770 --> 00:02:28,080
our associate sponsors,
57
00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:31,140
Breakthrough, CO2 AI,
with Dassault Systemes.
58
00:02:31,140 --> 00:02:32,520
We are very grateful to you
59
00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:35,070
for your support of this research.
60
00:02:35,070 --> 00:02:38,940
All right, a brief overview
of the study this year:
61
00:02:38,940 --> 00:02:42,240
we collected 1,810 valid responses
62
00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:44,970
from professionals across 91 countries
63
00:02:44,970 --> 00:02:47,310
working in sustainability, supply chain,
64
00:02:47,310 --> 00:02:50,370
logistics, and procurement
and other related functions.
65
00:02:50,370 --> 00:02:54,000
And the survey was available
in five different languages.
66
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:57,570
We have four broad themes
for this year's report.
67
00:02:57,570 --> 00:02:59,760
The first is geopolitics and governance.
68
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:00,720
We wanted to understand
69
00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:03,570
how tariffs and the
uncertainty around tariffs
70
00:03:03,570 --> 00:03:05,460
basically impact companies' ability
71
00:03:05,460 --> 00:03:07,920
to deliver on their
sustainability commitments,
72
00:03:07,920 --> 00:03:09,600
and also to see if they have
73
00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:11,730
their internal governance
structures in place
74
00:03:11,730 --> 00:03:13,890
to be able to follow
through their commitments.
75
00:03:13,890 --> 00:03:17,940
The second theme is on
sustainability in the supply chain,
76
00:03:17,940 --> 00:03:19,600
like, where does sustainability
77
00:03:20,550 --> 00:03:22,220
actually live in the supply chain?
78
00:03:22,220 --> 00:03:24,690
How is sustainability integrated
79
00:03:24,690 --> 00:03:26,400
into the operational decisions,
80
00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:28,350
and what are the challenges
companies are facing,
81
00:03:28,350 --> 00:03:29,610
both in terms of Scope three
82
00:03:29,610 --> 00:03:31,470
and overall supply chain as well?
83
00:03:31,470 --> 00:03:33,450
And the
Load full transcript
last theme revolves
84
00:03:33,450 --> 00:03:35,910
around freight transportation
and warehouse automation.
85
00:03:35,910 --> 00:03:39,030
We wanted to understand how
freight decarbonization,
86
00:03:39,030 --> 00:03:41,820
use of alternative fuels,
warehouse automation,
87
00:03:41,820 --> 00:03:45,120
and AI are shaping the overall landscape,
88
00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:46,680
and what is the implications of these
89
00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:49,500
on energy use, emissions, and waste.
90
00:03:49,500 --> 00:03:51,030
The first theme, which is focused
91
00:03:51,030 --> 00:03:52,590
on governance and geopolitics,
92
00:03:52,590 --> 00:03:55,980
what we see is companies' commitment
93
00:03:55,980 --> 00:03:57,450
to sustainability has increased.
94
00:03:57,450 --> 00:03:59,377
In fact, the question that we asked was,
95
00:03:59,377 --> 00:04:01,680
"Have your commitment to
sustainability changed
96
00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:04,110
as a result of policy changes?"
97
00:04:04,110 --> 00:04:06,900
Last year, what company said
is a majority of them said
98
00:04:06,900 --> 00:04:09,150
that there is no change in their
sustainability commitments,
99
00:04:09,150 --> 00:04:11,310
and a few person did said
100
00:04:11,310 --> 00:04:13,680
that they have increased
their commitments.
101
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:15,630
And interestingly, what we see this year
102
00:04:15,630 --> 00:04:18,150
to the same question is, like,
103
00:04:18,150 --> 00:04:19,830
a significant chunk of them
104
00:04:19,830 --> 00:04:21,600
actually have increased their commitments
105
00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:23,880
across North America, Europe, and Asia.
106
00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:26,700
But the downside is when we ask companies
107
00:04:26,700 --> 00:04:29,760
what has been the impact
of tariff uncertainty
108
00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:34,260
and the overall tariff shock
as itself on their commitment,
109
00:04:34,260 --> 00:04:37,200
and what we find is, overall, globally,
110
00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:42,200
68% of the companies claim
that they had to pause
111
00:04:43,230 --> 00:04:45,840
or scale back some of their
sustainability initiatives
112
00:04:45,840 --> 00:04:47,280
because of the shocks
113
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:49,830
as a result of the
uncertainty around tariff.
114
00:04:49,830 --> 00:04:52,410
And even worse, what we see is
115
00:04:52,410 --> 00:04:55,170
one in three companies actually report
116
00:04:55,170 --> 00:04:57,120
increase in their operational emissions
117
00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,730
as a result of tariff shocks.
118
00:04:59,730 --> 00:05:02,970
And more than eight in 10 companies
119
00:05:02,970 --> 00:05:05,580
across North America,
Asia, and Europe claim
120
00:05:05,580 --> 00:05:08,790
that geopolitical
conflicts reduce the impact
121
00:05:08,790 --> 00:05:11,010
of their climate actions
that they are taking,
122
00:05:11,010 --> 00:05:12,300
which is really sad.
123
00:05:12,300 --> 00:05:14,610
Moving on to the internal governance part,
124
00:05:14,610 --> 00:05:18,180
what we see is 83% of the respondents say
125
00:05:18,180 --> 00:05:21,180
that sustainability is
important to very important
126
00:05:21,180 --> 00:05:22,800
to their long-term success.
127
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:24,510
However, if you look at
128
00:05:24,510 --> 00:05:27,300
how these sustainability
decisions are integrated
129
00:05:27,300 --> 00:05:29,970
into their day-to-day operational aspect,
130
00:05:29,970 --> 00:05:34,320
we see companies that have
formal cross-functional team,
131
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:37,110
53% of them actually
integrate sustainability
132
00:05:37,110 --> 00:05:39,570
into their day-to-day
operational decisions.
133
00:05:39,570 --> 00:05:40,830
These are the companies
134
00:05:40,830 --> 00:05:44,220
that have only a single
sustainability team,
135
00:05:44,220 --> 00:05:45,990
which is not cross-functional,
136
00:05:45,990 --> 00:05:48,390
which has maybe one or two people,
137
00:05:48,390 --> 00:05:50,940
only 13% of them actually claim
138
00:05:50,940 --> 00:05:52,830
that they integrate sustainability
139
00:05:52,830 --> 00:05:54,360
into their operational decisions.
140
00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:55,980
Another interesting thing is
141
00:05:55,980 --> 00:05:57,180
when we looked at companies
142
00:05:57,180 --> 00:06:00,060
that have publicly stated
the sustainability goals,
143
00:06:00,060 --> 00:06:02,010
only 51% of them
144
00:06:02,010 --> 00:06:04,860
have a formal cross-functional
team structure.
145
00:06:04,860 --> 00:06:07,590
And in terms of the board oversight,
146
00:06:07,590 --> 00:06:10,230
what we find is only 33% of them
147
00:06:10,230 --> 00:06:13,050
have a say at the board level.
148
00:06:13,050 --> 00:06:14,340
And this basically shows
149
00:06:14,340 --> 00:06:15,990
how the internal governance structure
150
00:06:15,990 --> 00:06:17,310
plays a very important role
151
00:06:17,310 --> 00:06:20,190
for companies to be able to
invest in sustainability,
152
00:06:20,190 --> 00:06:22,020
also integrate sustainability
153
00:06:22,020 --> 00:06:23,820
into their day-to-day decisions.
154
00:06:23,820 --> 00:06:27,480
Moving on to the next theme,
which is AI and sustainability,
155
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:30,300
we asked whether companies
find AI's benefit
156
00:06:30,300 --> 00:06:33,000
to be outweighing the environmental costs.
157
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:34,620
And interestingly, what we find is
158
00:06:34,620 --> 00:06:36,630
a significant chunk of them say
159
00:06:36,630 --> 00:06:39,090
that they would continue to invest in AI
160
00:06:39,090 --> 00:06:42,780
while taking into account the
environmental costs of AI.
161
00:06:42,780 --> 00:06:45,120
And a small percentage actually say
162
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:46,890
that they have not been investing in AI
163
00:06:46,890 --> 00:06:47,970
because they're very cautious
164
00:06:47,970 --> 00:06:49,710
about the environmental downside.
165
00:06:49,710 --> 00:06:52,710
And
overall, 37% basically say
166
00:06:52,710 --> 00:06:56,310
that AI's benefit clearly
outweighs its environmental cost,
167
00:06:56,310 --> 00:06:59,220
and they have been investing
in AI to a large extent.
168
00:06:59,220 --> 00:07:03,510
We see that, of course,
in terms of AI use,
169
00:07:03,510 --> 00:07:07,950
a lot of companies are using
AI for emissions measurement.
170
00:07:07,950 --> 00:07:10,590
They're more than decision
making or scenario planning.
171
00:07:10,590 --> 00:07:12,570
And even in terms of
emissions measurement,
172
00:07:12,570 --> 00:07:14,220
a lot of companies are using AI
173
00:07:14,220 --> 00:07:17,520
to get data where
supplier data is missing,
174
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:21,150
aggregate data from different
sources, and also reporting.
175
00:07:21,150 --> 00:07:22,830
And when we ask companies
176
00:07:22,830 --> 00:07:24,780
what are the different
sustainability goals
177
00:07:24,780 --> 00:07:27,720
that AI has been able
to help them improve,
178
00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:30,990
57% of them claimed
operational efficiency,
179
00:07:30,990 --> 00:07:34,590
and about 47.7% of them said
180
00:07:34,590 --> 00:07:37,770
that AI is basically helping
them to reduce emissions.
181
00:07:37,770 --> 00:07:39,900
I'm not sure if companies are there yet
182
00:07:39,900 --> 00:07:43,350
in terms of finding out the
net environmental benefit
183
00:07:43,350 --> 00:07:45,780
of AI on overall emissions,
184
00:07:45,780 --> 00:07:47,970
but what we see is they at least perceive
185
00:07:47,970 --> 00:07:50,700
that AI has basically helped
them to measure emissions
186
00:07:50,700 --> 00:07:53,010
and also reduce emissions.
187
00:07:53,010 --> 00:07:56,730
We also focused on the
AI use in supply chain.
188
00:07:56,730 --> 00:07:59,880
Where is industrial AI and
agentic AI is being deployed,
189
00:07:59,880 --> 00:08:01,860
and what are the benefits of these?
190
00:08:01,860 --> 00:08:04,650
Only 18.5% of the companies say
191
00:08:04,650 --> 00:08:06,930
that they have integrated AI widely
192
00:08:06,930 --> 00:08:09,120
into their organizational functions,
193
00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:10,830
and about 50% of them say
194
00:08:10,830 --> 00:08:13,050
that they broadly use it
in multiple functions,
195
00:08:13,050 --> 00:08:14,910
but they haven't integrated it fully.
196
00:08:14,910 --> 00:08:18,510
And we asked, "What is the
implication of using AI
197
00:08:18,510 --> 00:08:21,360
in supply chain functions on emissions
198
00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:22,620
or on sustainability goals?"
199
00:08:22,620 --> 00:08:24,780
And what we see is that those
200
00:08:24,780 --> 00:08:28,110
who have integrated AI well
into their supply chain,
201
00:08:28,110 --> 00:08:33,110
85.8% of them say that AI
actually helps them reduce waste.
202
00:08:33,450 --> 00:08:35,130
And also, 84% of them claim
203
00:08:35,130 --> 00:08:38,100
that AI is helping them
identify emissions hotspot,
204
00:08:38,100 --> 00:08:40,170
and 81%
actually say
205
00:08:40,170 --> 00:08:43,080
AI is helping them reduce
their energy use or fuel.
206
00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:45,600
What we also find from the report is
207
00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:50,130
close to 63% of the firms
say that energy consumption
208
00:08:50,130 --> 00:08:52,560
is one of the top challenges
in their supply chain.
209
00:08:52,560 --> 00:08:54,540
I don't think companies are there yet
210
00:08:54,540 --> 00:08:58,500
in terms of finalizing the net
environmental benefit of AI.
211
00:08:58,500 --> 00:08:59,820
Going to the last theme,
212
00:08:59,820 --> 00:09:02,910
which is freight decarbonization
and warehouse automation,
213
00:09:02,910 --> 00:09:05,850
what we find is a lot of companies
214
00:09:05,850 --> 00:09:08,850
are trying to decarbonize their freight,
215
00:09:08,850 --> 00:09:11,550
but more companies are actually working
216
00:09:11,550 --> 00:09:13,500
on operational efficiency,
217
00:09:13,500 --> 00:09:15,390
increasing operational efficiencies,
218
00:09:15,390 --> 00:09:18,570
rather than actually changing
the fuel in the tank.
219
00:09:18,570 --> 00:09:20,910
If you see, 43% of the companies
220
00:09:20,910 --> 00:09:24,690
still use diesel primarily as a fuel,
221
00:09:24,690 --> 00:09:28,530
and also, in terms of
regulatory and policy changes,
222
00:09:28,530 --> 00:09:31,440
that has a lot of impact,
particularly for North America.
223
00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,080
Close to 43% of the firms say
224
00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:37,080
that the regulatory changes have actually
225
00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:39,270
made them rethink about their investments,
226
00:09:39,270 --> 00:09:41,610
and some have actually
paused their investments
227
00:09:41,610 --> 00:09:42,810
in sustainability initiatives
228
00:09:42,810 --> 00:09:46,170
because they do not know where
the policy is clearly headed.
229
00:09:46,170 --> 00:09:48,360
In terms of warehouse automation,
230
00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:52,830
what we see is 40% of the
firms that we surveyed
231
00:09:52,830 --> 00:09:55,590
are either moderately or fully automated,
232
00:09:55,590 --> 00:09:57,330
advanced or fully automated,
233
00:09:57,330 --> 00:10:00,120
and they have also been
using AI extensively
234
00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:02,010
in their decision making.
235
00:10:02,010 --> 00:10:04,680
But when we ask them what is the impact
236
00:10:04,680 --> 00:10:08,520
of automation on energy
consumption and waste,
237
00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:12,840
what we find is, as the
level of automation goes up,
238
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:15,510
close to 80% of the respondents say
239
00:10:15,510 --> 00:10:17,730
that actually their energy
consumption and waste
240
00:10:17,730 --> 00:10:19,950
have gone up as a result of automation.
241
00:10:19,950 --> 00:10:24,450
And so some of the key takeaways
from this year's report is,
242
00:10:24,450 --> 00:10:25,800
of course, commitment is strong,
243
00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:29,040
but execution has become
increasingly harder.
244
00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:31,050
And in terms of governance,
245
00:10:31,050 --> 00:10:33,480
I think it's important for companies
246
00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:35,460
not just to have goals in place,
247
00:10:35,460 --> 00:10:38,010
but also have the internal
governance structures in place
248
00:10:38,010 --> 00:10:40,470
to be able to follow
through those commitments.
249
00:10:40,470 --> 00:10:42,270
From a supply chain point of view,
250
00:10:42,270 --> 00:10:45,570
AI is being increasingly embedded
in operational decisions,
251
00:10:45,570 --> 00:10:46,950
but not in strategic decisions.
252
00:10:46,950 --> 00:10:49,470
So companies are using AI to measure,
253
00:10:49,470 --> 00:10:51,960
but I think it's high time
they use it to manage,
254
00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:54,060
and overall they look
at more collaboration
255
00:10:54,060 --> 00:10:55,920
for managing their Scope three emissions.
256
00:10:55,920 --> 00:11:00,030
There is a clear operational
efficiency benefits of AI use,
257
00:11:00,030 --> 00:11:02,940
but it's important that we
move away from efficiency
258
00:11:02,940 --> 00:11:05,100
to net environmental benefit.
259
00:11:05,100 --> 00:11:07,660
And in terms of freight decarbonization,
260
00:11:07,660 --> 00:11:09,810
more than focusing on incremental gains,
261
00:11:09,810 --> 00:11:13,080
it's important for companies
to go into deeper transitions
262
00:11:13,080 --> 00:11:14,610
and use alternative fuels
263
00:11:14,610 --> 00:11:16,620
and get into more capital investment.
264
00:11:16,620 --> 00:11:18,990
So the path forward is
not just more goals.
265
00:11:18,990 --> 00:11:21,480
It's better governance,
better measurement,
266
00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:23,220
smarter use of AI,
267
00:11:23,220 --> 00:11:26,250
and deeper transition in
the physical supply chain.
268
00:11:26,250 --> 00:11:28,170
Let's move on to the panel discussion.
269
00:11:28,170 --> 00:11:30,870
I would want to welcome our panelists.
270
00:11:30,870 --> 00:11:33,720
We have Rachel, who's
vice president of ESG
271
00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:35,310
from C.H. Robinson,
272
00:11:35,310 --> 00:11:37,440
Philippine, chief sustainability officer
273
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:39,000
from Dassault Systemes,
274
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,360
Severine, head of customer impact, CO2 AI,
275
00:11:42,360 --> 00:11:44,280
and Heather, vice president,
276
00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:46,560
enterprise solutions, Breakthrough.
277
00:11:46,560 --> 00:11:50,580
I would begin with a more
broad question for each of you,
278
00:11:50,580 --> 00:11:53,820
which is, over the past 12 months,
279
00:11:53,820 --> 00:11:56,280
what is the most change you have seen
280
00:11:56,280 --> 00:11:58,260
in your sustainability conversation
281
00:11:58,260 --> 00:12:00,960
within your organization
or within your customers?
282
00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:02,040
Is it AI?
283
00:12:02,040 --> 00:12:03,390
Is it economics?
284
00:12:03,390 --> 00:12:05,400
Is it policy
uncertainty?
285
00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:07,470
Or is it customer?
286
00:12:07,470 --> 00:12:09,540
Maybe we can start with Rachel, you.
287
00:12:09,540 --> 00:12:11,420
- Do I have to choose
from one of those listed?
288
00:12:11,420 --> 00:12:13,380
I mean, all of the above.
289
00:12:13,380 --> 00:12:16,200
Two comments I would make
about the last 12 to 18 months:
290
00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:19,290
in this room and the people
that we talk to all the time,
291
00:12:19,290 --> 00:12:21,840
we all know the importance
of sustainability.
292
00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:23,640
We know how it ties to business case,
293
00:12:23,640 --> 00:12:25,050
but there are plenty of people
294
00:12:25,050 --> 00:12:27,030
that don't go to New York Climate Week
295
00:12:27,030 --> 00:12:29,040
that hear a very different narrative
296
00:12:29,040 --> 00:12:30,600
and probably had very different thoughts
297
00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:31,740
about what was going to be happening
298
00:12:31,740 --> 00:12:33,150
over the 12 to 18 months,
299
00:12:33,150 --> 00:12:34,680
especially in the United States.
300
00:12:34,680 --> 00:12:36,660
What I do think has shifted slightly,
301
00:12:36,660 --> 00:12:39,780
and I don't know if it's
necessarily internal to Robinson,
302
00:12:39,780 --> 00:12:41,220
but what we're seeing some of
303
00:12:41,220 --> 00:12:46,220
is maybe a focusing in on the
things that are most important
304
00:12:46,380 --> 00:12:49,170
to a company's business
and to their stakeholders,
305
00:12:49,170 --> 00:12:50,370
which is how we've always talked
306
00:12:50,370 --> 00:12:52,410
about sustainability in the past,
307
00:12:52,410 --> 00:12:54,450
but this is kind of
pressure-testing it right now
308
00:12:54,450 --> 00:12:56,910
with so many other things
happening externally,
309
00:12:56,910 --> 00:12:59,760
geopolitically and economically.
310
00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:01,650
Really, what are the things that we know
311
00:13:01,650 --> 00:13:04,800
are the most critical
for our business strategy
312
00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,230
to our stakeholders to
either help mitigate risk
313
00:13:07,230 --> 00:13:09,180
or capitalize on opportunities?
314
00:13:09,180 --> 00:13:10,500
- Yeah, I'll second that.
315
00:13:10,500 --> 00:13:13,950
I would say what's really
changed in the last 12 months
316
00:13:13,950 --> 00:13:18,660
is that we are seeing an
increased focus on action
317
00:13:18,660 --> 00:13:21,150
rather than evidence building.
318
00:13:21,150 --> 00:13:23,400
I mean, I've been in the
sustainability sector
319
00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:25,080
for over 25 years,
320
00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:26,910
and there was such a long time
321
00:13:26,910 --> 00:13:29,310
where we were supposed
to build the evidence
322
00:13:29,310 --> 00:13:32,490
of making the case of why we need to act
323
00:13:32,490 --> 00:13:34,950
and why we need to have climate goals.
324
00:13:34,950 --> 00:13:38,580
And the good news is
that with all the noise
325
00:13:40,170 --> 00:13:43,620
and negative zeitgeist that's going on,
326
00:13:43,620 --> 00:13:46,560
people are really focusing on action.
327
00:13:46,560 --> 00:13:50,040
And it's also true that
what you just said, Rachel,
328
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,190
is that because there
is so much competition
329
00:13:53,190 --> 00:13:55,770
as well on capital allocation,
330
00:13:55,770 --> 00:13:58,410
you need to make a better business case
331
00:13:58,410 --> 00:14:01,620
of what the sustainability
is going to bring to you,
332
00:14:01,620 --> 00:14:03,090
and that means more action
333
00:14:03,090 --> 00:14:06,360
and more tangible results to scale that.
334
00:14:06,360 --> 00:14:07,980
- I will continue towards that.
335
00:14:07,980 --> 00:14:12,240
So the first thing on our side
is what we get to ask for.
336
00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:14,850
So CO2 AI, I will introduce who we are
337
00:14:14,850 --> 00:14:16,980
because I'm not sure
you're familiar with us.
338
00:14:16,980 --> 00:14:20,640
So we are a AI sustainability
global company,
339
00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:23,220
and we help a large company
340
00:14:23,220 --> 00:14:26,190
solve their complex issue
toward the supply chain.
341
00:14:26,190 --> 00:14:28,800
So what company ask us for,
342
00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:30,990
and it echoes what Philippine just said,
343
00:14:30,990 --> 00:14:34,350
is that before they asked
for us for measurement
344
00:14:34,350 --> 00:14:37,260
to answer the reporting question.
345
00:14:37,260 --> 00:14:40,170
And today, what they're asking us for
346
00:14:40,170 --> 00:14:44,700
is more business case-led use case.
347
00:14:44,700 --> 00:14:48,450
What they want to achieve
is sustainability impacts,
348
00:14:48,450 --> 00:14:50,520
but also profit impact.
349
00:14:50,520 --> 00:14:55,520
And the second thing that I
see also is who is in the room.
350
00:14:56,130 --> 00:15:00,300
Beforehand, we used to work
mostly with sustainability team.
351
00:15:00,300 --> 00:15:03,750
Over the last year, we are
working across function,
352
00:15:03,750 --> 00:15:05,910
sustainability partnering together
353
00:15:05,910 --> 00:15:10,080
with our procurements colleague, R&D,
354
00:15:10,080 --> 00:15:11,940
and even legal and finance
355
00:15:11,940 --> 00:15:16,740
when you look at packaging
decision, EPR, and so on.
356
00:15:16,740 --> 00:15:18,450
- Breakthrough helps leading shippers
357
00:15:18,450 --> 00:15:23,130
manage their freight, fuel,
and sustainability decisions
358
00:15:23,130 --> 00:15:25,380
with data-driven influence,
359
00:15:25,380 --> 00:15:27,420
really helping them get
a better understanding
360
00:15:27,420 --> 00:15:30,210
of what's happening in
their transportation.
361
00:15:30,210 --> 00:15:31,740
Much of that here in the North America
362
00:15:31,740 --> 00:15:33,180
sits within Scope three,
363
00:15:33,180 --> 00:15:36,030
meaning they don't have
direct visibility to that.
364
00:15:36,030 --> 00:15:39,450
So we are helping
them
collect that information,
365
00:15:39,450 --> 00:15:41,550
being able to ingest that into our system
366
00:15:41,550 --> 00:15:44,640
and use that for not only
the emissions calculation,
367
00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:47,850
but also for building
decarbonization roadmaps
368
00:15:47,850 --> 00:15:49,020
going forward.
369
00:15:49,020 --> 00:15:52,110
And what I would echo is that shift
370
00:15:52,110 --> 00:15:54,540
towards that cross-functional team.
371
00:15:54,540 --> 00:15:56,220
In my world, the decision makers
372
00:15:56,220 --> 00:15:58,290
sit within the operations, transportation,
373
00:15:58,290 --> 00:15:59,700
procurement organization.
374
00:15:59,700 --> 00:16:02,700
Those are the folks that
are paying for the solutions
375
00:16:02,700 --> 00:16:04,680
to help them reduce their emissions,
376
00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:07,710
but it needs alignment with
the sustainability team.
377
00:16:07,710 --> 00:16:09,900
In addition to that, it's the fact
378
00:16:09,900 --> 00:16:11,850
that the conversation is shifting away
379
00:16:11,850 --> 00:16:15,667
from just calculating and
reporting emissions into,
380
00:16:15,667 --> 00:16:17,670
"How do I reduce my emissions?
381
00:16:17,670 --> 00:16:18,960
What is the cost for that?
382
00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:21,810
Who are the carriers that
can help me execute that?
383
00:16:21,810 --> 00:16:24,120
And what are the trade-offs
that I might have to consider
384
00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:26,430
as I make those choices?"
385
00:16:26,430 --> 00:16:30,080
- So that points to Severine.
386
00:16:30,080 --> 00:16:32,790
We see one of the striking
findings in our report
387
00:16:32,790 --> 00:16:35,580
is the increasing use
of AI in sustainability,
388
00:16:35,580 --> 00:16:37,560
particularly in the measurement space.
389
00:16:37,560 --> 00:16:40,200
So where do you see are the quickest wins
390
00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:42,210
in your interactions with companies,
391
00:16:42,210 --> 00:16:44,430
and what differentiates companies
392
00:16:44,430 --> 00:16:46,920
that use AI to measure emissions
393
00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:50,850
versus those who use AI to reduce carbon?
394
00:16:50,850 --> 00:16:53,280
- So I will start with one fact.
395
00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:55,620
One of the quick win is unglamorous
396
00:16:55,620 --> 00:16:57,930
because it's working on data.
397
00:16:57,930 --> 00:17:02,160
I'm pretty sure around you,
like, the data is quite messy,
398
00:17:02,160 --> 00:17:04,200
unstructured, fragmented,
399
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:08,280
and scattered around different
system, file, and so on.
400
00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:12,660
So what AI does the best is it ingests,
401
00:17:12,660 --> 00:17:15,510
it harmonize those different
fragmented data set
402
00:17:15,510 --> 00:17:19,650
that you have, and it fills
the gaps where it's missing.
403
00:17:19,650 --> 00:17:22,620
So that's quite the quick win that I see.
404
00:17:22,620 --> 00:17:26,100
Let me share with you a concrete
example.
405
00:17:26,100 --> 00:17:28,470
So we're working with one of the largest
406
00:17:28,470 --> 00:17:30,810
food and beverage company in the world,
407
00:17:30,810 --> 00:17:35,810
and they have about 30,000
material to categorize.
408
00:17:36,990 --> 00:17:41,990
So materials, they are spread
across different system,
409
00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:47,480
different country, different
formats, and no shared logic.
410
00:17:48,030 --> 00:17:52,170
So every reporting cycle is done by hand,
411
00:17:52,170 --> 00:17:54,390
and you can't carry over
412
00:17:54,390 --> 00:17:57,090
what you have learned
from one year to another.
413
00:17:57,090 --> 00:18:00,600
So what we have done,
AI has built a model,
414
00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:05,430
and the model is able to
judge the sources of the data
415
00:18:05,430 --> 00:18:10,080
to fill the data gap where
you need to estimate it,
416
00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:14,220
but also to escalate where it's unclear.
417
00:18:14,220 --> 00:18:15,510
Because at the end of the day,
418
00:18:15,510 --> 00:18:18,840
it's quite important to
keep a human in the loop
419
00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:22,710
to make the final decision on
which data you want to keep
420
00:18:22,710 --> 00:18:25,050
and which is not the right one.
421
00:18:25,050 --> 00:18:28,470
So to give you a key
number to keep in mind,
422
00:18:28,470 --> 00:18:33,090
they had 60% of those
30,000 material categorized.
423
00:18:33,090 --> 00:18:36,713
With that AI model, we were
able to bring them to 96%,
424
00:18:38,280 --> 00:18:41,700
which enables them not only to showcase
425
00:18:41,700 --> 00:18:43,500
the effort they have done
426
00:18:43,500 --> 00:18:46,260
in term of recycling their material,
427
00:18:46,260 --> 00:18:51,260
but also to claim that from
a packaging and tax liability
428
00:18:51,330 --> 00:18:53,880
when speaking about EPR.
429
00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:58,680
In term of measuring versus reducing here,
430
00:18:58,680 --> 00:19:01,980
I will say it's not a technology gap.
431
00:19:01,980 --> 00:19:04,380
It's more of a mindset gap.
432
00:19:04,380 --> 00:19:06,480
The companies that are coming to us,
433
00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,930
either they are looking
into data for reporting,
434
00:19:09,930 --> 00:19:13,980
or they are looking into
data for decision making.
435
00:19:13,980 --> 00:19:17,310
And let me give you a
concrete example with that.
436
00:19:17,310 --> 00:19:19,560
I work a lot with my clients
437
00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:23,070
on how to engage their supply chain.
438
00:19:23,070 --> 00:19:25,863
When you ask your supplier about data,
439
00:19:26,970 --> 00:19:28,730
what is your end goal with it?
440
00:19:28,730 --> 00:19:33,540
Do you only want the data
capture the primary related data
441
00:19:33,540 --> 00:19:38,250
for reporting, or do you want
to make a decision out of it?
442
00:19:38,250 --> 00:19:40,687
Think of a decision from,
443
00:19:40,687 --> 00:19:44,880
"I want to develop a low-carbon
alternative for my material.
444
00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:47,520
I want to redesign it.
445
00:19:47,520 --> 00:19:50,070
I want to have an impact on my packaging."
446
00:19:50,070 --> 00:19:53,070
And for me, I see it a clear benefit.
447
00:19:53,070 --> 00:19:55,380
- My next question is to you, Philippine.
448
00:19:55,380 --> 00:19:57,180
When we hear from senior leaders,
449
00:19:57,180 --> 00:19:58,013
a lot of them say
450
00:19:58,013 --> 00:20:01,050
that they want to invest in
sustainability initiatives,
451
00:20:01,050 --> 00:20:04,770
but when those investment
decisions go to the CFO,
452
00:20:04,770 --> 00:20:07,560
oftentimes it's about
the business case, right?
453
00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:10,350
So what stops companies from transitioning
454
00:20:10,350 --> 00:20:13,170
from climate goals to action today?
455
00:20:13,170 --> 00:20:16,110
Is it because of data and
technology challenges,
456
00:20:16,110 --> 00:20:18,270
or is it because they're
failing to understand
457
00:20:18,270 --> 00:20:20,880
the economic value of those investments?
458
00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:22,260
- That's a very good question.
459
00:20:22,260 --> 00:20:24,750
It's not a question of technology gap
460
00:20:24,750 --> 00:20:27,960
so much as it is a question
of mindset, really,
461
00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:32,280
and whether or not they
want to use the data
462
00:20:32,280 --> 00:20:34,230
that they have access to today
463
00:20:34,230 --> 00:20:36,750
through virtual twins, for instance,
464
00:20:36,750 --> 00:20:41,750
or through a generative AI
embedded in virtual twins.
465
00:20:41,970 --> 00:20:44,550
It's how they want to use that data.
466
00:20:44,550 --> 00:20:47,760
Are they going to use
it in a holistic manner
467
00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:50,790
that allows to embed sustainability
468
00:20:50,790 --> 00:20:53,190
from the design stage of the product
469
00:20:53,190 --> 00:20:55,320
through the production, distribution,
470
00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,260
and until the end of life of the product
471
00:20:58,260 --> 00:21:01,020
to ensure that there's more circularity?
472
00:21:01,020 --> 00:21:04,710
Or are they going to use it just to report
473
00:21:04,710 --> 00:21:06,900
how their supplies are doing?
474
00:21:06,900 --> 00:21:10,350
To your point today, what
the technology can do,
475
00:21:10,350 --> 00:21:12,120
what virtual twins can do, for instance,
476
00:21:12,120 --> 00:21:16,620
is that they allow you
to track and measure
477
00:21:16,620 --> 00:21:19,440
what's going on all
through your supply chain.
478
00:21:19,440 --> 00:21:21,630
They allow you to adapt
479
00:21:21,630 --> 00:21:24,900
because the granularity of the data
480
00:21:24,900 --> 00:21:27,600
that you're able to get today means
481
00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:31,650
that you're able to make
strategic arbitrage in real time.
482
00:21:31,650 --> 00:21:35,700
And so you can decide
to go for one supplier
483
00:21:35,700 --> 00:21:38,700
because it's
going to be
more sustainably sourced,
484
00:21:38,700 --> 00:21:40,950
or decide on another material
485
00:21:40,950 --> 00:21:44,580
because it's going to have
increased recyclability
486
00:21:44,580 --> 00:21:46,200
at the end of the product.
487
00:21:46,200 --> 00:21:48,030
For instance, for product,
488
00:21:48,030 --> 00:21:51,390
it allows to optimize the
weight-material ratio.
489
00:21:51,390 --> 00:21:55,260
So enabling you, when you
produce a given product,
490
00:21:55,260 --> 00:21:58,800
to meet your constraints
in terms of regulation,
491
00:21:58,800 --> 00:22:00,090
in terms of safety,
492
00:22:00,090 --> 00:22:02,910
in terms of what you want
your end product to be,
493
00:22:02,910 --> 00:22:04,590
but at the same time, make sure
494
00:22:04,590 --> 00:22:09,590
that you use the least amount
of resource to do that.
495
00:22:09,630 --> 00:22:12,180
And it allows you also to imagine.
496
00:22:12,180 --> 00:22:14,970
So imagine, for instance, new material,
497
00:22:14,970 --> 00:22:17,970
and I think that's where
the groundbreaking increase
498
00:22:17,970 --> 00:22:20,520
in sustainability can occur as well,
499
00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:24,180
is through innovation in new materials.
500
00:22:24,180 --> 00:22:25,290
- Rachel, to you.
501
00:22:25,290 --> 00:22:28,230
One of the interesting
findings from our study
502
00:22:28,230 --> 00:22:30,450
on the freight decarbonization theme
503
00:22:30,450 --> 00:22:32,730
is the customer and tender requirements
504
00:22:32,730 --> 00:22:36,270
as one of the strongest drivers
of freight decarbonization,
505
00:22:36,270 --> 00:22:40,320
68% in North America and 67% in Europe.
506
00:22:40,320 --> 00:22:44,910
However, what we also see
is 43% of the companies say
507
00:22:44,910 --> 00:22:46,680
that their fleets run on diesel.
508
00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:51,600
So if there is strong customer drive,
509
00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:54,327
why hasn't the fuel in the tank changed?
510
00:22:54,327 --> 00:22:56,100
And from a shipper point of view,
511
00:22:56,100 --> 00:22:57,540
is it long-term commitments
512
00:22:57,540 --> 00:23:01,590
or higher price for a lower-emission fuel,
513
00:23:01,590 --> 00:23:03,570
or is it something else?
514
00:23:03,570 --> 00:23:05,490
- First, I'll say I'm thinking back
515
00:23:05,490 --> 00:23:07,350
to even probably like
three or four years ago
516
00:23:07,350 --> 00:23:10,260
being in rooms like this,
specifically on the freight side,
517
00:23:10,260 --> 00:23:11,280
and the conversation
518
00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:14,070
about bringing procurement
into the discussion
519
00:23:14,070 --> 00:23:16,290
around sustainability
wasn't a best practice
520
00:23:16,290 --> 00:23:17,850
at that point with freight.
521
00:23:17,850 --> 00:23:21,060
And so it's nice to see that
this is gaining traction
522
00:23:21,060 --> 00:23:22,920
because I do think it's
an important piece.
523
00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:24,630
So I'm with C.H. Robinson.
524
00:23:24,630 --> 00:23:26,310
We are a logistics service provider,
525
00:23:26,310 --> 00:23:28,140
and I say that just to
kind of set the stage
526
00:23:28,140 --> 00:23:29,340
for what our business model is,
527
00:23:29,340 --> 00:23:33,060
which is we work with all
modes, air, rail, truck.
528
00:23:33,060 --> 00:23:34,080
We're global.
529
00:23:34,080 --> 00:23:36,000
We don't own any of those assets.
530
00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:41,000
And so 99.4% or more of our
emissions are Scope three.
531
00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:45,900
And we also work with
90,000 customers a year
532
00:23:45,900 --> 00:23:46,733
that are shippers,
533
00:23:46,733 --> 00:23:48,420
and that's a really, really wide variety.
534
00:23:48,420 --> 00:23:51,330
So again, there's some of
them that are very mature
535
00:23:51,330 --> 00:23:54,000
and sophisticated in
their sustainability work,
536
00:23:54,000 --> 00:23:55,500
and there's some that
they just aren't there.
537
00:23:55,500 --> 00:23:56,880
So there's a big range,
538
00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:57,900
and when I speak to this,
539
00:23:57,900 --> 00:23:58,890
it's going to be kind of the average.
540
00:23:58,890 --> 00:24:00,600
So to your point about the tenders,
541
00:24:00,600 --> 00:24:02,940
there's a whole piece to that
542
00:24:02,940 --> 00:24:04,200
that I think we need to unpack,
543
00:24:04,200 --> 00:24:06,900
which is it's very nice to hear
544
00:24:06,900 --> 00:24:08,400
that you all are seeing more alignment
545
00:24:08,400 --> 00:24:09,630
internally with customers.
546
00:24:09,630 --> 00:24:10,950
I would say that's still a challenge.
547
00:24:10,950 --> 00:24:12,750
We have some customers
are great with that,
548
00:24:12,750 --> 00:24:13,890
or shippers are great about that,
549
00:24:13,890 --> 00:24:15,510
but getting that alignment
550
00:24:15,510 --> 00:24:17,737
before you get into the
procurement process around,
551
00:24:17,737 --> 00:24:19,440
"What are our priorities,
552
00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:20,970
and what are we actually going after?"
553
00:24:20,970 --> 00:24:22,770
And having the sustainability people
554
00:24:22,770 --> 00:24:24,000
and the transportation people,
555
00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:27,600
and everyone needs to be in
the conversation ahead of time.
556
00:24:27,600 --> 00:24:29,130
There's a range in what
we're getting asked.
557
00:24:29,130 --> 00:24:30,460
Sometimes it's kind of a,
558
00:24:30,460 --> 00:24:33,330
"Tell us about your
sustainability program or policy,"
559
00:24:33,330 --> 00:24:34,687
all the way through,
560
00:24:34,687 --> 00:24:37,140
"Price out every single lane you have
561
00:24:37,140 --> 00:24:39,420
for EV or for alternative fuels."
562
00:24:39,420 --> 00:24:42,090
So I think that that can be
a really important driver,
563
00:24:42,090 --> 00:24:44,370
and there has to be the follow-on,
564
00:24:44,370 --> 00:24:45,750
which is making sure
565
00:24:45,750 --> 00:24:47,100
that those are asking the right questions,
566
00:24:47,100 --> 00:24:48,633
and then how are you engaging beyond that?
567
00:24:48,633 --> 00:24:52,020
So I just think there's more
nuance that needs to happen
568
00:24:52,020 --> 00:24:52,980
beyond just the RFP,
569
00:24:52,980 --> 00:24:54,270
and that's where forums like this
570
00:24:54,270 --> 00:24:55,800
or making sure that you're collaborating
571
00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:58,290
and having discussions with the
shippers, with the carriers,
572
00:24:58,290 --> 00:25:01,620
with everyone in the room
through whatever venue that is,
573
00:25:01,620 --> 00:25:02,820
is really important.
574
00:25:02,820 --> 00:25:03,660
And it goes beyond
575
00:25:03,660 --> 00:25:05,130
just what the shipper has to be doing too,
576
00:25:05,130 --> 00:25:06,480
like, how are we thinking?
577
00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:10,080
As an LSP, what can we be
doing to educate our shippers
578
00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:11,670
and our carriers on what works
579
00:25:11,670 --> 00:25:13,957
so they're not just looking
at every single lane, like,
580
00:25:13,957 --> 00:25:15,900
"Here's where the EV
could work really well.
581
00:25:15,900 --> 00:25:17,730
Here's where alternative
fuels could work really well,"
582
00:25:17,730 --> 00:25:19,830
so that we're having more
of a strategic conversation
583
00:25:19,830 --> 00:25:21,270
beyond the RFP.
584
00:25:21,270 --> 00:25:23,760
- Heather, to you, my question is,
585
00:25:23,760 --> 00:25:26,043
there are a number of freight
decarbonization solutions
586
00:25:26,043 --> 00:25:28,080
that are available out there.
587
00:25:28,080 --> 00:25:31,200
So what do you think
should companies focus on?
588
00:25:31,200 --> 00:25:33,900
Should it be a portfolio
of those solutions,
589
00:25:33,900 --> 00:25:36,810
or should they look at lane by lane?
590
00:25:36,810 --> 00:25:38,880
- Certainly it's a lane-by-lane choice
591
00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:40,380
with a portfolio of solutions.
592
00:25:40,380 --> 00:25:42,930
There is no one-stop shop when it comes
593
00:25:42,930 --> 00:25:44,790
to alternative energies.
594
00:25:44,790 --> 00:25:49,140
A shipper is moving goods across regions.
595
00:25:49,140 --> 00:25:52,380
They need to understand
where their routed lanes
596
00:25:52,380 --> 00:25:55,680
are going to pass by
electric charging stations,
597
00:25:55,680 --> 00:25:58,470
where they're going to
pass by renewable diesel
598
00:25:58,470 --> 00:26:01,050
fueling stations or renewable natural gas
599
00:26:01,050 --> 00:26:03,000
or compressed natural gas stations.
600
00:26:03,000 --> 00:26:07,620
They can't just use one
solution and apply it nationwide
601
00:26:07,620 --> 00:26:10,470
or regional across entire regions.
602
00:26:10,470 --> 00:26:13,500
So that is absolutely a key strategy here,
603
00:26:13,500 --> 00:26:15,570
is being willing to flex
604
00:26:15,570 --> 00:26:17,490
and being willing to use the data
605
00:26:17,490 --> 00:26:20,700
to decide where these
opportunities might exist.
606
00:26:20,700 --> 00:26:22,590
A big part of what my team does
607
00:26:22,590 --> 00:26:25,680
is make recommendations
for carrier partners
608
00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:28,800
that are executing
alternative energy today.
609
00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:31,350
I'm guiding our shippers to ask
610
00:26:31,350 --> 00:26:34,830
more specific questions
about alternative energy.
611
00:26:34,830 --> 00:26:36,330
It's important for them to know
612
00:26:36,330 --> 00:26:39,420
if their carrier partners do
have sustainability goals,
613
00:26:39,420 --> 00:26:41,280
but what is that going to do
614
00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:43,950
to help them actually
reduce their emissions?
615
00:26:43,950 --> 00:26:45,090
Very little.
616
00:26:45,090 --> 00:26:46,260
The questions that a shipper
617
00:26:46,260 --> 00:26:48,517
should be asking carrier partners is,
618
00:26:48,517 --> 00:26:51,270
"Do you invest in
alternative energy equipment?
619
00:26:51,270 --> 00:26:53,040
Where do you have this equipment?
620
00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:55,200
Would you be willing to partner with me
621
00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:57,570
on an investment in this space?"
622
00:26:57,570 --> 00:27:01,380
And certainly the longer contract periods
623
00:27:01,380 --> 00:27:03,300
is a key point here.
624
00:27:03,300 --> 00:27:06,360
When a shipper wants to
use renewable natural gas
625
00:27:06,360 --> 00:27:09,930
to move goods, that requires
a truck with a CNG engine.
626
00:27:09,930 --> 00:27:12,390
There is a premium on those trucks.
627
00:27:12,390 --> 00:27:15,990
So to ask a carrier to
invest in that equipment,
628
00:27:15,990 --> 00:27:18,660
it's a big ask, and it's a
question that needs to come
629
00:27:18,660 --> 00:27:22,590
with a longer-term
commitment on that freight.
630
00:27:22,590 --> 00:27:26,040
So that's a big piece of this strategy.
631
00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:27,600
To use a sports analogy,
632
00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:30,090
people need a lot of
at-bats in this space.
633
00:27:30,090 --> 00:27:31,740
They need to practice.
634
00:27:31,740 --> 00:27:34,560
They need to set up the right
tracking and audit systems
635
00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:36,330
to be able to identify
636
00:27:36,330 --> 00:27:39,150
where an alternative energy is being used,
637
00:27:39,150 --> 00:27:40,590
what is the feedstock,
638
00:27:40,590 --> 00:27:42,060
what's the right carbon intensity
639
00:27:42,060 --> 00:27:44,820
to be applying on their
emissions calculations.
640
00:27:44,820 --> 00:27:46,890
And that's not something
that just happens naturally.
641
00:27:46,890 --> 00:27:49,020
It takes effort, it takes planning,
642
00:27:49,020 --> 00:27:51,840
and it takes a strong
partnership with the carriers.
643
00:27:51,840 --> 00:27:54,930
So certainly it's going to
be a portfolio approach.
644
00:27:54,930 --> 00:27:56,700
- Heather, can I just a follow-on to that?
645
00:27:56,700 --> 00:27:58,500
One thing that I think has also changed
646
00:27:58,500 --> 00:28:00,780
from your
first question
over the last 12 to 18 months
647
00:28:00,780 --> 00:28:03,390
is for so long when we
would talk to shippers,
648
00:28:03,390 --> 00:28:05,400
they were so dead set on EV,
649
00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:07,260
and that was the only thing
they ever wanted to do.
650
00:28:07,260 --> 00:28:10,800
It'd be like, "I need all of
my freight on an EV tomorrow."
651
00:28:10,800 --> 00:28:12,690
And then you look at their freight,
652
00:28:12,690 --> 00:28:14,490
and it's in rural Alabama.
653
00:28:14,490 --> 00:28:17,220
And now I feel like shippers
are more understanding
654
00:28:17,220 --> 00:28:18,510
of the fact that there are limitations,
655
00:28:18,510 --> 00:28:21,090
and there's a plethora of
options that they can talk to,
656
00:28:21,090 --> 00:28:22,530
and that comes from education,
657
00:28:22,530 --> 00:28:23,820
I'm sure from groups like yours as well.
658
00:28:23,820 --> 00:28:25,020
But that has started to shift
659
00:28:25,020 --> 00:28:28,230
that people are seeing kind of
more of a portfolio solution.
660
00:28:28,230 --> 00:28:29,097
- 100%.
661
00:28:29,097 --> 00:28:33,390
And I would add, in North
America specifically,
662
00:28:33,390 --> 00:28:37,890
I know this was one of the
responses in the survey here,
663
00:28:37,890 --> 00:28:40,980
we are still seeing shippers
want to take advantage
664
00:28:40,980 --> 00:28:43,740
of alternative energy
despite some of the rollbacks
665
00:28:43,740 --> 00:28:46,110
from a federal policy standpoint.
666
00:28:46,110 --> 00:28:48,480
Renewable diesel is the
first option that I lean into
667
00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:50,610
with shippers if they're
moving any freight
668
00:28:50,610 --> 00:28:53,340
across California, Oregon, and Washington.
669
00:28:53,340 --> 00:28:56,190
Those are LCFS states where
the cost of renewable diesel
670
00:28:56,190 --> 00:28:59,610
is typically at parity with
ultra-low-sulfur diesel.
671
00:28:59,610 --> 00:29:01,410
Great first solution.
672
00:29:01,410 --> 00:29:06,410
Renewable natural gas is
available across the entire US,
673
00:29:06,630 --> 00:29:08,550
also a great solution if they're willing
674
00:29:08,550 --> 00:29:11,700
to make a longer-term
commitment with their carriers.
675
00:29:11,700 --> 00:29:14,490
EV, much tougher, as I
think everybody knows.
676
00:29:14,490 --> 00:29:17,040
Works really great in
port dray situations,
677
00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:20,340
works really great in
short-haul situations.
678
00:29:20,340 --> 00:29:23,310
It's a little bit trickier
with longer-haul movements
679
00:29:23,310 --> 00:29:25,530
and heavier freight too.
680
00:29:25,530 --> 00:29:28,920
- Philippine, to you, the question is,
681
00:29:28,920 --> 00:29:31,050
companies are increasingly finding
682
00:29:31,050 --> 00:29:33,180
supply chain visibility and traceability
683
00:29:33,180 --> 00:29:35,400
to be less of a challenge.
684
00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:37,200
How do you use digital twins
685
00:29:37,200 --> 00:29:39,210
and other data-driven technologies?
686
00:29:39,210 --> 00:29:43,140
How do you use that to be able
to identify the right product
687
00:29:43,140 --> 00:29:46,353
or make better decisions even
before the emissions occur?
688
00:29:47,460 --> 00:29:50,400
- Yeah, we can use virtual twins today
689
00:29:50,400 --> 00:29:52,260
at a very granular level.
690
00:29:52,260 --> 00:29:55,830
It really goes at the school level.
691
00:29:55,830 --> 00:29:58,230
It's really super macro,
692
00:29:58,230 --> 00:30:01,320
so you can optimize at every stage.
693
00:30:01,320 --> 00:30:03,870
And today, one of the
main argument as well
694
00:30:03,870 --> 00:30:06,060
for moving to more sustainability
695
00:30:06,060 --> 00:30:10,050
is the adaptability to the
disruption of the supply chain.
696
00:30:10,050 --> 00:30:11,970
And what we're finding is that
697
00:30:11,970 --> 00:30:16,410
through virtual twins
generated with generative AI,
698
00:30:16,410 --> 00:30:18,180
you can actually adapt
699
00:30:18,180 --> 00:30:20,790
to changing circumstances much faster.
700
00:30:20,790 --> 00:30:22,230
In the last 18 months,
701
00:30:22,230 --> 00:30:25,080
because of geopolitical
uncertainty mainly,
702
00:30:25,080 --> 00:30:29,700
disruptions to supply chains
have increased by 40%.
703
00:30:29,700 --> 00:30:33,300
And so we've had clients turning to us
704
00:30:33,300 --> 00:30:37,980
to help them identify how
they can fix those disruption
705
00:30:37,980 --> 00:30:41,430
and how best to be agile and resilient
706
00:30:41,430 --> 00:30:45,390
in reacting and adapting to
these changing circumstances.
707
00:30:45,390 --> 00:30:47,460
I think we do have the tools.
708
00:30:47,460 --> 00:30:49,590
What I was saying earlier,
it's a question of mindset,
709
00:30:49,590 --> 00:30:53,370
but it's a question as well
of knowledge and know-how
710
00:30:53,370 --> 00:30:55,650
and sharing best practices.
711
00:30:55,650 --> 00:30:59,640
Because even if this
technology are available
712
00:30:59,640 --> 00:31:02,850
and can have a tremendous impact,
713
00:31:02,850 --> 00:31:06,030
people don't necessarily
know about it yet.
714
00:31:06,030 --> 00:31:08,070
And there's a lot of know-how
715
00:31:08,070 --> 00:31:10,020
and knowledge sharing to be done.
716
00:31:10,020 --> 00:31:12,360
- My next question to you, Severine,
717
00:31:12,360 --> 00:31:16,080
we see that the
collaboration among companies
718
00:31:16,080 --> 00:31:17,730
to manage their Scope three emissions
719
00:31:17,730 --> 00:31:19,263
have gone up significantly,
720
00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:22,620
but still companies
point out supplier data
721
00:31:22,620 --> 00:31:24,030
to be the hardest challenge
722
00:31:24,030 --> 00:31:26,730
when it comes to managing
Scope three emissions.
723
00:31:26,730 --> 00:31:30,090
How much of this challenge could AI solve?
724
00:31:30,090 --> 00:31:32,580
And how much of this does it boil down
725
00:31:32,580 --> 00:31:36,510
to building supplier trust,
investing in your supplier,
726
00:31:36,510 --> 00:31:39,090
training them, and things like that?
727
00:31:39,090 --> 00:31:41,100
- I think it's a mix of both.
728
00:31:41,100 --> 00:31:43,650
From a capability point of view,
729
00:31:43,650 --> 00:31:46,320
AI is answering the question.
730
00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:48,900
And let me give you a concrete example.
731
00:31:48,900 --> 00:31:52,260
So when we are working with your customer,
732
00:31:52,260 --> 00:31:54,630
the key to engage supplier,
733
00:31:54,630 --> 00:31:57,780
and especially their low-maturity supplier
734
00:31:57,780 --> 00:32:00,150
whose emission matters,
735
00:32:00,150 --> 00:32:04,977
is to enable them with
methodology, tooling, and so on.
736
00:32:04,977 --> 00:32:08,670
And AI is able to answer that.
737
00:32:08,670 --> 00:32:11,100
So we have equipped them with an agent.
738
00:32:11,100 --> 00:32:14,490
Something similar is that
a chatbot you're all using
739
00:32:14,490 --> 00:32:16,200
on a day-to-day basis.
740
00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:20,100
Pretty much the supplier
is able to feed that agent
741
00:32:20,100 --> 00:32:21,780
with the data that relates
742
00:32:21,780 --> 00:32:23,970
to their product carbon footprint,
743
00:32:23,970 --> 00:32:28,970
bill of material, energy,
transportation, and so on.
744
00:32:29,160 --> 00:32:31,740
And the agent will enable them
745
00:32:31,740 --> 00:32:35,520
to compute a PACT-compliant PCF.
746
00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:36,757
You're going to tell me,
747
00:32:36,757 --> 00:32:41,757
"Okay, but then how am I
sure I can trust the data?"
748
00:32:41,910 --> 00:32:45,900
Then this is important to have
an expert, a human in a loop,
749
00:32:45,900 --> 00:32:49,020
to verify not only the methodology,
750
00:32:49,020 --> 00:32:51,810
but also the accuracy of the data
751
00:32:51,810 --> 00:32:55,380
that they feed the AI agent with.
752
00:32:55,380 --> 00:32:57,840
- My next question is
for all the panelists.
753
00:32:57,840 --> 00:33:00,810
We see, of course, AI
being increasingly used.
754
00:33:00,810 --> 00:33:05,810
So what it takes from using
AI in different use cases
755
00:33:06,090 --> 00:33:08,250
to deploying at scale, right?
756
00:33:08,250 --> 00:33:10,440
Is it data?
757
00:33:10,440 --> 00:33:11,280
Is it governance?
758
00:33:11,280 --> 00:33:12,360
Is it people?
759
00:33:12,360 --> 00:33:16,650
Is it a business case or
the broader ecosystem?
760
00:33:16,650 --> 00:33:18,510
- I think it's all of the above,
761
00:33:18,510 --> 00:33:21,510
but more importantly, it's
really tangible results.
762
00:33:21,510 --> 00:33:26,510
And I think sustainability,
the tracking, the measurement,
763
00:33:26,550 --> 00:33:31,170
the enablement of more holistic
strategic decision making
764
00:33:31,170 --> 00:33:34,710
through that tracking and
measurement of trustworthy data
765
00:33:34,710 --> 00:33:37,590
and connecting of all the ecosystem means
766
00:33:37,590 --> 00:33:41,910
that sustainability is
a
positive AI application.
767
00:33:41,910 --> 00:33:46,910
And for that reason, it's
providing tangible results.
768
00:33:47,310 --> 00:33:50,883
And as such, it has a potential
to scale quite quickly.
769
00:33:51,750 --> 00:33:53,490
- I think also all of the above.
770
00:33:53,490 --> 00:33:54,870
I mean, that's a really hard one.
771
00:33:54,870 --> 00:33:56,340
They're all such important inputs
772
00:33:56,340 --> 00:33:58,830
to make sure that you're doing this well.
773
00:33:58,830 --> 00:34:02,190
Certainly, the way that C.H.
Robinson would think about it
774
00:34:02,190 --> 00:34:04,890
as we start is a business problem
775
00:34:04,890 --> 00:34:06,900
that you're solving is critical first
776
00:34:06,900 --> 00:34:08,460
because you're not getting into hobby AI.
777
00:34:08,460 --> 00:34:09,897
And when we're thinking
about sustainability
778
00:34:09,897 --> 00:34:13,060
and the impacts, the net positive,
779
00:34:13,060 --> 00:34:14,730
if you're really focused
780
00:34:14,730 --> 00:34:15,900
on the things that are most important,
781
00:34:15,900 --> 00:34:18,750
that's going to help with
the efficient use of it.
782
00:34:18,750 --> 00:34:20,430
I think the governance component is huge
783
00:34:20,430 --> 00:34:21,840
to make sure that you're doing this
784
00:34:21,840 --> 00:34:23,940
in a responsible way from the start.
785
00:34:23,940 --> 00:34:24,773
We're all learning,
786
00:34:24,773 --> 00:34:26,160
but to have something in place
787
00:34:26,160 --> 00:34:28,650
to be able to flex with is huge.
788
00:34:28,650 --> 00:34:30,180
And I think you've said it so many times,
789
00:34:30,180 --> 00:34:32,010
that importance of the human in the loop,
790
00:34:32,010 --> 00:34:34,050
all the process flows that are around that
791
00:34:34,050 --> 00:34:35,580
and the change management with it.
792
00:34:35,580 --> 00:34:36,413
If what you're trying to do
793
00:34:36,413 --> 00:34:40,290
is execute on a broad
scale across an enterprise,
794
00:34:40,290 --> 00:34:42,450
having people come along
with you is critical.
795
00:34:42,450 --> 00:34:44,130
You need their feedback.
796
00:34:44,130 --> 00:34:46,890
- I think what strikes me
about this conversation
797
00:34:46,890 --> 00:34:48,120
is that I actually believe
798
00:34:48,120 --> 00:34:51,570
that AI is a contributor
to the collaboration
799
00:34:51,570 --> 00:34:54,600
that we're seeing across teams internally.
800
00:34:54,600 --> 00:34:57,840
So it feeds right back into
that initial conversation
801
00:34:57,840 --> 00:35:00,480
that we had about the decision makers,
802
00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:03,180
the procurement,
transportation, operations teams
803
00:35:03,180 --> 00:35:05,190
connecting with sustainability.
804
00:35:05,190 --> 00:35:08,400
It facilitates those
discussions, answers questions,
805
00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:11,550
gives practical
recommendations for options
806
00:35:11,550 --> 00:35:13,890
to reduce emissions in the network.
807
00:35:13,890 --> 00:35:15,600
But on the governance side,
808
00:35:15,600 --> 00:35:18,840
bad data just means bad decisions faster,
809
00:35:18,840 --> 00:35:21,180
which is not a good solution.
810
00:35:21,180 --> 00:35:23,100
So certainly data and governance
811
00:35:23,100 --> 00:35:25,410
is really critical here too.
812
00:35:25,410 --> 00:35:28,050
- To close the loop on
that question for me,
813
00:35:28,050 --> 00:35:31,350
I will advise you to keep it narrow.
814
00:35:31,350 --> 00:35:34,590
I mean, AI is unlocking so many use cases,
815
00:35:34,590 --> 00:35:38,010
but don't try to solve it all at once.
816
00:35:38,010 --> 00:35:41,700
You are not doing something
over with your company.
817
00:35:41,700 --> 00:35:45,630
So name a problem, name a pain point
818
00:35:45,630 --> 00:35:49,140
where you can drive
sustainability impact out of it,
819
00:35:49,140 --> 00:35:54,060
but also bolt your model
and look for proof point.
820
00:35:54,060 --> 00:35:56,970
And with that in mind, that direction,
821
00:35:56,970 --> 00:35:58,410
keep in mind three things.
822
00:35:58,410 --> 00:36:00,090
There is this framework
823
00:36:00,090 --> 00:36:03,090
that for me puts quite of a guidance,
824
00:36:03,090 --> 00:36:06,360
is 10% on your algorithm,
825
00:36:06,360 --> 00:36:09,540
20% on your data and technology,
826
00:36:09,540 --> 00:36:12,030
and the remaining 70%
827
00:36:12,030 --> 00:36:14,760
is around the people and the process.
828
00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:17,850
So I echo what my
colleague was saying here.
829
00:36:17,850 --> 00:36:20,640
Do not underestimate the change management
830
00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:23,040
that goes with your AI use cases,
831
00:36:23,040 --> 00:36:25,230
but really keep it narrower.
832
00:36:25,230 --> 00:36:27,540
- All right, thank you so much, panelists,
833
00:36:27,540 --> 00:36:29,160
for an insightful discussion.
834
00:36:29,160 --> 00:36:31,525
Thank you so much,
everyone, for joining us.
835
00:36:31,525 --> 00:36:34,108
(upbeat music)
836
00:36:36,240 --> 00:36:39,600
- That wraps up this episode
of "Supply Chain Frontiers."
837
00:36:39,600 --> 00:36:42,300
A big thank you to the panelists
for sharing their expertise
838
00:36:42,300 --> 00:36:43,830
and insights into the current state
839
00:36:43,830 --> 00:36:46,350
of sustainability and supply chain.
840
00:36:46,350 --> 00:36:51,210
To learn more about the lab,
visit sustainable.mit.edu.
841
00:36:51,210 --> 00:36:53,250
This episode of "Supply Chain Frontiers"
842
00:36:53,250 --> 00:36:57,330
was recorded live at Climate
Week New York City 2026.
843
00:36:57,330 --> 00:37:00,750
Our sound editors are Dave
Lashinsky and Danielle Simpson
844
00:37:00,750 --> 00:37:02,730
and David Benjamin Sound.
845
00:37:02,730 --> 00:37:05,310
Our producer is myself, Mackenzie Berry.
846
00:37:05,310 --> 00:37:07,020
Be sure to check out previous episodes
847
00:37:07,020 --> 00:37:12,020
of "Supply Chain Frontiers"
at ctl.mit.edu/podcasts
848
00:37:12,840 --> 00:37:15,453
or search for us on your
preferred podcast platform.
849
00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:17,460
I'm Mackenzie Berry.
850
00:37:17,460 --> 00:37:18,600
Thanks for listening,
851
00:37:18,600 --> 00:37:21,256
and we'll catch you next time
on "Supply Chain Frontiers."
852
00:37:21,256 --> 00:37:23,839
(upbeat music)