6. Hashtag inventor (and much more) Chris Messina

WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:12.080
Geek Out! with Matt Navarra is sponsored by Pinterest. Inspire your audience and grow your company on Pinterest with a free business account. Learn more at business.pinterest.com. It's time to Geek Out!
2
00:00:12.120 --> 00:00:27.360
[upbeat music] Hello, and welcome to Geek Out! with Matt Navarra, sponsored by Pinterest. I am Matt Navarra. And I'm Martin SFP Bryant.
3
00:00:27.820 --> 00:00:34.640
Not many people can claim to have invented one of the central features of almost all social media, but our guest today certainly can.
4
00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:41.780
Chris Messina invented the hashtag way back in 2007, but there's way more to him than just that. Yes, that's right.
5
00:00:41.860 --> 00:00:51.460
Chris is one of the most interesting people around to talk to about social media products, how they're built, how they're used. Uh, and I had the privilege to hang out with him in, um, in Australia recently in Perth.
6
00:00:51.560 --> 00:01:00.820
Uh, it was an amazing trip for an event there, and we talked about all sorts of stuff to do with social media. So he's a true geek's geek, uh, and we'll be looking forward to having him here shortly.
7
00:01:01.060 --> 00:01:06.100
And we should point out as well that this is the final episode of the season. It is a finale, a season finale.
8
00:01:06.240 --> 00:01:14.460
So, uh, we- when we came up with the idea for this podcast, we, we decided to do a six-week run just to see how it went. Uh, and to be honest, we've been blown away by the response.
9
00:01:14.540 --> 00:01:20.020
It has been better than we ever, um, hoped or expected, so we fully intend to be back for you very soon.
10
00:01:20.120 --> 00:01:30.700
Uh, your feedback is always, um, appreciated, so do get in touch with us on Twitter using the hashtag geekoutquestions, and you can find me there as @mattnavarra. And I'm @martinsfp.
11
00:01:30.800 --> 00:01:35.160
So Matt, what have you been up to this week? Oh, a couple of things in terms of the geeky side of stuff.
12
00:01:35.480 --> 00:01:52.940
I have been playing with something called Kindred, which is a new kind of influencer marketing platform, um, which has got some of the people that are behind, uh, ContentCal are involved in it as well, and it's kind of a spin on what we already know for, uh, both influencers and brands are trying to join in the middle to do different deals.
13
00:01:53.040 --> 00:02:05.800
Uh, and the kind of U- USP of Kindred seems to be, um, that there's a minimum requirement of, of up from 1% upwards that, say, the influencer or the brands have to kind of give to charity, a nominated charity as part of the process.
14
00:02:06.160 --> 00:02:16.520
But it basically gives them a platform to, to join up with so they can see all the things that these brands wanna sell or, um, to push, push out on social channels, and then the influencers can kind of pick and choose which ones they want to get involved in.
15
00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:25.590
So it's a interesting spin on, on the whole influencer marketing space. So I'm looking forward to having a play with that one. Uh, also been looking into doing a, a social media Geek Out! meetup.
16
00:02:25.700 --> 00:02:33.540
So I'm gonna be speaking at Social Media Week in the Netherlands, uh, in The Hague, actually, in November on the 14th, which is my birthday.
17
00:02:34.060 --> 00:02:48.480
Um, so they offered me the chance to build up a meetup for people in the Facebook group or people who are in the area of, uh, the Netherlands who, um, uh, listen to the podcast to meet up and just hang out and, uh, do, than what we do on the podcast, discuss all these geeky things in person.
18
00:02:48.580 --> 00:02:55.500
So that's coming soon. And of course, been, uh, talking to you about season two. So we're looking at guests that we might wanna bring on.
19
00:02:55.660 --> 00:03:04.580
We've got a couple of big names that we really wanted to get on season one, but there was just too much, uh, other stuff that we wanted to cram in, so we're gonna hold that back into season two.
20
00:03:05.040 --> 00:03:16.020
Uh, and also see what we can do to improve bits that maybe people want more of or people want less of. So yeah, I've been thinking about that a lot this week. Yeah. M- my week was, uh, spent, uh, um, partly in Vienna.
21
00:03:16.200 --> 00:03:28.540
In fact, last week's episode was edited in a Vienna hotel room. I'd, uh, traveled to one of the world's most beautiful cities and spent my night sitting in a small room and just editing this podcast in Adobe Audition.
22
00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:37.420
Uh, but, uh, no, I was there to, uh, meet a load of startups, uh, tech startups, and talk about, uh, pitching to the press and how that's changed over the years. Uh, it's totally changed, as I was saying last week.
23
00:03:37.800 --> 00:03:46.480
Uh, and, uh, so that went well. Uh, some good stuff come out with it. And, uh, also, uh, apps-wise, I've been playing with Instagram Threads, and we'll, uh, talk about that a bit more later on.
24
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:50.560
So now we're joined by Chris Messina. Welcome, Chris. Thank you. I'm glad to be here.
25
00:03:51.140 --> 00:03:58.049
So tell, tell us and tell everyone else who's listening a bit about you, 'cause I know you from the fact that we've hung out a little bit, uh, recently, which is amazing.
26
00:03:58.460 --> 00:04:07.700
Uh, some people will know you as the inventor of the hashtag, which I'm sure you're sick and to death of talking about. [laughs] So don't worry, we're not gonna spend 30 minutes going about how you invented the hashtag.
27
00:04:08.020 --> 00:04:14.640
But tell us a little bit about your potted history and your career to date. Yeah. So, uh, I'm-- I consider myself a, a product designer.
28
00:04:14.980 --> 00:04:19.140
Um, and I've spent a lot of my career working on developer platforms and social technology.
29
00:04:19.180 --> 00:04:27.840
And so what that's meant is trying to figure out how to create products that people use to connect and to communicate, um, you know, with their friends and other people.
30
00:04:28.440 --> 00:04:40.320
And, um, I feel like, you know, my timing just happened to be really good when I arrived in Silicon Valley around 2004 to help to launch the Firefox browser. So my background is also in open source and open platforms.
31
00:04:40.420 --> 00:04:47.960
Um, and that's kind of like, you know, been my, I guess, career so far, and I've spent some time at Google, I spent some time at Uber, and I've also worked, um, with startups.
32
00:04:48.160 --> 00:05:09.880
I had an, a conversational AI startup, um, not too long ago and, um, you know, you and I happened to meet, uh, this, this year, um, during what I'm thinking of now as my kind of walkabout year, um, as I kind of travel the world and, and given some talks about my experiences and where I see things going when it comes to social media, AI, conversational software and technology, um, you know, voice computing and stuff like that.
33
00:05:10.280 --> 00:05:18.240
Awesome. Well, it w- it was a totally awesome experience in Australia 'cause it was like a geek, an ultimate geek meeting, meeting another ultimate geek. Totally. [laughs] It was, it was perfect.
34
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:27.660
So- We, we went deep pretty quickly. It was great. Well, we're gonna chat to Chris in a moment a bit more in detail, but first of all, let's get, dig into the news and see what's been going on in social this week.
35
00:05:27.720 --> 00:05:29.260
So Martin, what, what have we got this week?
36
00:05:29.540 --> 00:05:42.180
Well, yes, just after we hit publish on last week's episode, Instagram launched a new app called Threads, a new messaging app, uh, aimed at, uh, keeping you in touch with your close friends and sharing statuses with them.
37
00:05:42.600 --> 00:05:59.748
Uh, now, the first news of this broke a couple of months ago when The Verge had a scoop about this app's existence, and, uh, it sounded to me really, really interesting, like it was going to be kind of like, uh, the revival of Path- Path, for those of you who don't remember, was a, a really beautifully designed app.
38
00:05:59.868 --> 00:06:07.728
It was designed to let you share your status and, uh, what you're up to with just your closest friends, and share photos, what you're watching, what you're listening to.
39
00:06:07.768 --> 00:06:14.438
It was just a really ni- it had a really nice feel to it and, uh, you know, different vibe to other social media. So this sounded like this could be exactly that.
40
00:06:14.468 --> 00:06:21.748
And I have to say, in its initial incarnation, I'm a little disappointed with Threads. It feels to me like it could've been a tab within Instagram.
41
00:06:21.788 --> 00:06:33.848
It's essentially a, a filter for, uh, Instagram that just, uh, gives you the messaging and the, uh, stories from your closest friends. And, uh, other than a,
42
00:06:34.848 --> 00:06:42.648
a, a quite interesting status sharing thing, which is, is quite interesting, other than that, there's not a lot to it. Uh, Matt, what do you make of it? Yeah.
43
00:06:42.748 --> 00:06:55.168
Well, I always think with Facebook that there's this thing where they, they like to just sort of throw out a lot of kind of ideas and kind of like, uh, uh, small apps that they wanna try to see if anything sticks and what works, and if anything gets traction.
44
00:06:55.208 --> 00:07:01.308
And if it doesn't, they just, just sort of d- you know, disband it and get rid of it. Uh, I, so I always wonder whether this is just yet another one of those.
45
00:07:01.628 --> 00:07:05.328
But, you know, if you read a little bit of the coverage about it, you know, it, it does make sense.
46
00:07:05.428 --> 00:07:12.048
You know, they do want to keep on top of this kind of, uh, in- interest in messaging, in private messaging, particularly with close friends and family.
47
00:07:12.628 --> 00:07:22.948
Um, and to be able to do that, having it built into the main app, the Instagram app, would limit the ability for them to, to, to kind of build out and develop it further, so having it as a separate app.
48
00:07:23.208 --> 00:07:41.408
But what we've, we've seen on other apps where they've, where they've done this, where they've had a separate app for something, um, it kind of struggles 'cause people don't want to flick between two different versions of the app for two different parts of the utility of the app, whether it's like messaging is in one part and you flick back into another one to have the r- you know, the rest of the experience.
49
00:07:41.488 --> 00:07:44.898
So that, that concerns me as to whether that will become a problem for them.
50
00:07:45.218 --> 00:07:57.728
But also, um, uh, the, the privacy side of things was quite interesting because they, they, they actually, uh, Facebook blogged separately about not only the app as a one blog post, but they had a separate blog post about the privacy settings.
51
00:07:57.828 --> 00:08:05.848
So they were very conscious of their track record in privacy and the importance- Mm... of underlining the, the issues and concerns people might have with, with that.
52
00:08:06.187 --> 00:08:11.488
But, um, you know, I, I think it's a, it's a cute little app. It, you know, it doesn't have huge amounts of functionality in there.
53
00:08:11.528 --> 00:08:24.168
It's got some, you know, interesting features like you mentioned with this, the status, the auto status, which you can kind of let it, uh, track what your, um, kind of where you are and a couple of other details to then be able to set your status if you want to.
54
00:08:24.268 --> 00:08:34.948
Um, but, uh, in terms of whether it'll stick, if I was to put money on it today, I don't think it'll be here in five years' time. But, um- Mm... Chris, what do you think? [laughs] Uh, you know, it's, it's interesting.
55
00:08:35.148 --> 00:08:48.268
Um, like, if you were to evaluate this product, I suppose as you might evaluate, you know, a new car coming out or something, then I think that, you know, we, your analysis probably is, is completely reasonable.
56
00:08:48.668 --> 00:09:12.588
But I've been looking at what Facebook's doing, I think, from a very different lens, um, which is both, you know, competing with a bunch of other companies that are out there that are doing things that of course they think are, um, if not existential, certainly are eroding or could erode their market share when it comes to advertiser dollars, influencer dollars, video spend, like things like that, that are very important to, like, their, their core business.
57
00:09:13.048 --> 00:09:21.688
Um, and at the same time, I think if I were to imagine being inside the company, like, you know, these products don't come out of, you know, kind of nowhere, right?
58
00:09:21.748 --> 00:09:29.268
Like, they all require a number of product reviews, an executive to sign off, and there's a strategy, and there's, like, all the stuff that actually is going on behind the scenes.
59
00:09:29.288 --> 00:09:35.448
And so what we're actually seeing in terms of products coming out are trailing indicators of their overall strategy.
60
00:09:35.468 --> 00:09:43.748
So if I were to imagine a couple things, first of all, we know that there is a move within the company to unify all of the messaging products, right?
61
00:09:43.788 --> 00:09:53.748
Not just to make them interoperable, but that interoperability has to, I think, in some way be about driving towards the future of unifying a bunch of products and perhaps, um, decommissioning others.
62
00:09:54.068 --> 00:09:59.068
You know, uh, you guys had talked about in one of your previous episodes about, um, retiring the Group story.
63
00:10:00.108 --> 00:10:15.888
Well, that's very interesting and very significant because they've literally put stories in almost all of the Facebook suite of products, and to take it away from one means that they're looking at the behavior in that context and saying, "Okay, what is the behavior in that area that we want to really focus on?"
64
00:10:16.308 --> 00:10:17.568
Um, and it's not gonna be stories.
65
00:10:17.607 --> 00:10:31.278
It's gonna be conventional, old school, you know, posting to feeds, getting updates, and there's a certain cohort of users that, you know, might not be, um, you know, a younger audience, might not be an urban audience, who are used to a s- let's say a slower Facebook.
66
00:10:31.758 --> 00:10:42.208
Then there's the people who are using Facebook on a much faster clip who, uh, I think are probably going to use a product like Threads for visual communication, and that's taking on, you know, Snapchat pretty directly.
67
00:10:42.788 --> 00:10:54.208
Um, and it's not-- I mean, remember that Messenger itself was sort of, you know, the Adam's rib of the Facebook app. Messenger itself used to be embedded in the Facebook, uh, the blue app, and it became its own app.
68
00:10:54.248 --> 00:11:03.758
Of course, lots of people were upset about it, but they did that, and over time, I think it makes sense, that if, if you were to imagine having to go into the Facebook app to get to your messages, that actually doesn't make sense.
69
00:11:03.788 --> 00:11:08.248
So what I think is happening is that more and more private communication is happening within Instagram.
70
00:11:08.988 --> 00:11:27.068
Instagram itself is becoming a little bit more like YouTube, where it's a bit performative, where there's a lot more p- professional content, um, where there's a lot of monetization going on, where you're seeing fashion brands and other people selling and using it as kind of a marketplace, and those messages don't quite make as much sense in terms of the private communications.
71
00:11:27.758 --> 00:11:38.008
So they also had to launch a messaging app that both felt slick and felt modern and did something a little bit new that a younger audience that was never exposed to Path might find interesting, and that's the auto statuses.
72
00:11:38.408 --> 00:11:47.188
And that's why they had to put out this additional blog post around privacy to basically say, "Look, this is going to be sort of a passive way of sharing in order to find out what your friends are up to," very much like Snapchat,
73
00:11:48.108 --> 00:11:57.708
um, with a new audience that doesn't have the same set of concerns or apprehensions or anxieties that some of us might have about- Automatically sharing those things, right?
74
00:11:57.768 --> 00:12:06.088
I mean, even if you look at the types of things that, um, are auto-shares, you know, the status include things like studying and stuff like that, things that are completely...
75
00:12:06.118 --> 00:12:14.748
Like, there's nothing in there for working, um, which would be the adult equivalent of studying. [laughs] So I think that's really, really important in understanding, like, their strategy and where this is going.
76
00:12:14.868 --> 00:12:31.028
So can you tell us what, what, from your point of view, what, what do you think makes the difference between, uh, an app that's successful in having a core app like a Facebook and then a separate app they farm out, which is for messaging, and it being successful, uh, versus one that does that and doesn't succeed?
77
00:12:31.128 --> 00:12:34.828
What, what is... what do you think is the kind of thing that makes it a success or not a success?
78
00:12:34.888 --> 00:12:45.608
Because there's so many apps, or, or certainly with Facebook, I've seen many experiences of them creating, uh, separate apps to kind of get one core functionality separated from it, and it's kind of bombed.
79
00:12:45.858 --> 00:12:51.898
And other times, like Messenger is a good example, as you said, that it made it work. What, what, what is the thing that makes it work or not work?
80
00:12:52.148 --> 00:13:01.968
I think, like, you have to understand success, I think, from a different perspective. I mean, if you look at it from, like, it has to be an, you know, a home run or something, um, like that's not actually...
81
00:13:01.988 --> 00:13:04.368
I'm sorry to use like a baseball metaphor, but how you win baseball.
82
00:13:04.688 --> 00:13:12.248
Like there's a lot of like singles and doubles, um, and just, you know, playing like all of the different like moves that you can make within the sport.
83
00:13:12.748 --> 00:13:25.608
And in this case, uh, you'll learn that I'm a very visual person, so like the thing that comes to mind is that you have this bird feeder, and it's incredibly busy, and there's like these large pigeons coming in, but like the hummingbirds are sort of like floating around, and they have no place to go.
84
00:13:25.648 --> 00:13:28.528
And then there's like little chickadees and like, you know, they can't eat or something like that.
85
00:13:28.568 --> 00:13:44.448
And so what I think this strategy is about is kind of pulling out, uh, and creating sort of like a separate bird feeder for a separate type of activity and a separate type of a user cohort that's very important to Facebook, uh, and that was being crowded out by the professional influencer content on Instagram itself.
86
00:13:44.828 --> 00:13:51.748
So therefore, Threads becomes a place where you can go for those private messages, for direct messages, for interacting with your closest friends.
87
00:13:51.768 --> 00:13:55.668
It's literally like it was taking out the functionality of that close friends feature,
88
00:13:56.628 --> 00:14:10.068
putting it into a separate app, and giving people a focused way of getting into it, and then allowing those people who are using it for direct messaging to then tell their friends about Threads, and then it becomes viral in that sense, where, um, the early users will kind of get their friends into it.
89
00:14:10.368 --> 00:14:17.268
And for those who are starting to wane on using Instagram because it was no longer about their friends, that sort of is a strategy for, for grabbing that, that audience.
90
00:14:17.298 --> 00:14:21.728
And so essentially now you have two bird feeders that are feeding different populations but are as important.
91
00:14:21.828 --> 00:14:37.268
Now, that new bird feeder, one, may take a while to actually attract, you know, the same number of, or the same amount of activity as the original one, but it's still holding a significant amount of the audience that it needs to hold onto in order for the future to be, you know, vibrant essentially.
92
00:14:37.548 --> 00:14:42.087
So when you think about the success of these things, remember, like Threads is the successor to Direct.
93
00:14:42.388 --> 00:14:51.307
Direct was a product that Facebook was working on before that was very much in the same vein, but didn't go far enough to create, I would say, kind of like a pure product conception.
94
00:14:51.848 --> 00:14:59.248
Like I've been using Threads a bit, and it feels like if I were 13 again, like, and I got the app, I would actually find it, like, pretty delightful.
95
00:14:59.488 --> 00:15:07.248
Like all the public sharing and all the, you know, um, peacocking stuff just isn't really... Those behaviors are not really part of the app.
96
00:15:07.348 --> 00:15:13.068
It's really is about the close sharing, which is an, a, an incredibly important core activity that people use social media for.
97
00:15:13.728 --> 00:15:20.968
So- And do you think it's gonna make it harder for them to, to do anything in the monetization space for them in terms of it being close friends? Because the, the...
98
00:15:21.008 --> 00:15:34.288
I, I always get the, the feeling that when it's, um, with a, a, a close private com- um, communication with a, a small group of people, close contacts, that being, that being invaded by advertisers either through content- Here's, here's, here's what...
99
00:15:34.308 --> 00:15:42.488
Sorry, here's what I think is happening here. Um, on the data side of it, the data they can grab- Exactly... about your real time location- That's right... that can be used everywhere.
100
00:15:42.608 --> 00:15:51.718
When iOS 13 came out and, uh, Apple started nudging me, "This app's taking your location constantly. Do you want it to be to do that?" I went to the... I opened Facebook, it did that.
101
00:15:51.728 --> 00:15:59.788
I was like, "No, just when the app's open," so, you know, when I, when I, when I need it to know my location. And as soon as Threads launched, yeah, go on then Facebook, you can have my real time location.
102
00:16:00.148 --> 00:16:07.308
Yeah, you're 100% right. And also it's not, yeah, Facebook, you can have my location. It's, I want to keep my friends up to date because my friends are keeping everyone else up to date.
103
00:16:07.617 --> 00:16:16.438
And so now there's a social pressure for you to continue to share that implicit- Mm-hmm... activity data that no longer you feel compelled to do in the Instagram app.
104
00:16:16.868 --> 00:16:26.718
So these are new ways of collecting the same amount of data because iOS 13 and the, its privacy protections are an existential threat, again, to Facebook's business model.
105
00:16:27.108 --> 00:16:35.368
So they wanna start building up that profile of you or of your friends or of, you know, a younger generation somehow, and they need to capture that activity now.
106
00:16:35.488 --> 00:16:40.168
So again, when you think about the success of it, it's not about it becoming like a replacement for Instagram.
107
00:16:40.228 --> 00:16:47.548
It's about capturing a, a cohort of users that were starting to fade and that are necessary for the future success of the overall ecosystem.
108
00:16:48.018 --> 00:16:56.498
And, and, and closing up on this one, 'cause I could spend an hour talking, this is great stuff. This is why I invite Chris on- [laughs]... 'cause he's so awesome with this stuff. I could spend hours. Um, but do, y-y...
109
00:16:56.518 --> 00:17:05.188
Chris, do, do you see this as an app in your gut feeling, uh, that's gonna stick around? Or is this something that you feel it hasn't got quite what it needs? What, what's your sort of immediate thoughts about it?
110
00:17:05.928 --> 00:17:12.428
Um, so it, it, I think it actually depends on the leadership. Um, and I say that in a, in both a broad and specific way.
111
00:17:12.748 --> 00:17:26.088
The specific leaders of, uh, Threads itself and their relationship to Ian and Adam Mosseri and, and those guys at Instagram and what the relationship is there, because there are these amazing, like, quiet integration points.
112
00:17:26.268 --> 00:17:37.228
So specifically when you are using auto status in Threads, it will show up in Instagram. So you now, it's almost like the, the blue, uh, message in iMessage, you know, versus like the green bubbles.
113
00:17:37.328 --> 00:17:46.598
Um, I can now see who is using Threads based on the auto status. And so that type of coordination between the two products I think is incredibly important for its, like, long-term success.
114
00:17:46.948 --> 00:17:56.568
The other thing that I think is very important is that, as you know, a lot of these apps are constantly testing new features and new functionality, you know, all over the world to see what works.
115
00:17:57.224 --> 00:18:04.824
I think the most important thing for a lot of these apps, especially coming out of Facebook, is to provide the barest of the bare essentials and only to build up from there.
116
00:18:05.384 --> 00:18:13.974
You know, it was significant that Instagram removed, uh, the friends activity feed this week 'cause that feature has been in there for eight or nine years, right?
117
00:18:14.684 --> 00:18:18.424
Um, the fact that something was removed almost never happens because of the blowback.
118
00:18:18.804 --> 00:18:39.804
And so Threads has done a pretty good job, I think, of threading the needle of being close enough to Snapchat that it's familiar, and also providing a clear product story that if you don't use Instagram that much and you get Threads, it actually provides, like, a really useful experience that's camera first and better than iMessage and a little bit faster than Snap, although that's TBD.
119
00:18:40.324 --> 00:18:48.204
Um, doesn't have a lot of bloat, but can add stuff from here based on user requests. And so now that it's out in the wild, now we'll see how it can grow.
120
00:18:48.214 --> 00:18:52.484
So I do think it actually has quite a bit of potential, especially with a younger audience. Awesome.
121
00:18:52.524 --> 00:18:58.864
Well, they- we're gonna talk a little bit back, um, about the Instagram removal of following, uh, the following activity tab stuff in a, in a bit.
122
00:18:58.944 --> 00:19:10.504
But, uh, I, I'm intrigued by all of this because the, the, the, the, the attack that Facebook seems to be making on iMessage to, to dominate the messaging space is, is growing and, and, and is quite exciting for a geek like me.
123
00:19:10.544 --> 00:19:18.364
[laughs] Um, but story two this week is a bit about Google and its plans for attacking TikTok. Uh, Martin, what's going on there? Yeah.
124
00:19:18.464 --> 00:19:27.604
Yeah, so, uh, The Wall Street Journal had a story, uh, which sounds to me, this sounds to me the kind of story that comes out when a startup wants to sell itself.
125
00:19:27.934 --> 00:19:38.024
And so either the lawyers or the, the founder or the bankers or someone starts feeding a journalist, "Hey, look, this company's got interest," uh, to try and boost the price.
126
00:19:38.044 --> 00:19:45.444
But, um, uh, I don't know if that's true or not, but that, that's what generally happens a lot. Uh, but, uh, yeah, so Firework is an app which is a bit like TikTok.
127
00:19:45.524 --> 00:19:52.624
Uh, it lets, uh, users share 30-second clips, and, uh, it's aimed at a slightly older audience than, uh, TikTok though.
128
00:19:52.764 --> 00:20:04.004
And, uh, Google is apparently, uh, considering, uh, buying it, um, according to The Wall Street Journal, and also, uh, the Chinese, uh, company Weibo has also expressed interest. Uh, Matt, what are your thoughts?
129
00:20:04.544 --> 00:20:10.104
Well, yeah, i- it, there's a scant detail about the, the, the genuine level of interest, um, that Google has.
130
00:20:10.164 --> 00:20:20.204
I think I even saw some tweets about it when this story came out about actually if there was a, a, any genuine interest, um, from Google. But, um, but this is a really hot space right now.
131
00:20:20.244 --> 00:20:28.124
We've seen now Byte coming back into this area. This is the, you know, creators of Vine coming back with their version of a short video kind of app.
132
00:20:28.624 --> 00:20:39.424
Um, we've seen a, a massive interest from, um, people in TikTok, which I think is partly led by the huge amounts of money the company spent on promoting it and advertising it to get those downloads.
133
00:20:39.704 --> 00:20:49.984
I think I saw a stat this week that it, TikTok now surpassed, um, the, uh, Instagram in terms of the number of active users in India. Um, and so they're, they're making inroads there, um, heavily.
134
00:20:50.574 --> 00:20:58.724
Um, but, um, I'm just not sure because, um, the, these apps, um, they have a very narrow set of, um, um, s- things that you can do.
135
00:20:58.744 --> 00:21:06.504
It's very much short videos, which don't lend themselves to kind of, um, mid-roll ads and all sorts of other advertising options that can, people can have.
136
00:21:06.884 --> 00:21:13.924
But at the same time, you can't get away from the fact that there is a phenomenal amount of hype and interest around this kind of content.
137
00:21:13.964 --> 00:21:18.584
And I was a big fan of Vine when it was there, um, and I was disappointed that it, well, disappeared.
138
00:21:19.064 --> 00:21:26.384
Um, I've w- increasingly become addicted to TikTok in, in a short space of time, even though I'm probably not the demographic that it's aimed at.
139
00:21:26.944 --> 00:21:37.124
Um, and then we've seen the likes of f- um, Facebook clearly desperate to kind of get its claws into this space as well with its Lasso app as well, which doesn't seem to have done much in terms of total downloads.
140
00:21:37.204 --> 00:21:46.264
So it's, it-- for me, I'm g- I'm intrigued to see how the, the, who, who comes out winning out the TikTok or Facebook's equivalent and, and this Firework app and others.
141
00:21:46.344 --> 00:21:54.024
Um, Chris, what's going on with this, this area of, of social right now, do you think? Well, uh, you know, it's funny actually, this is a story that I, that I missed.
142
00:21:54.224 --> 00:22:01.343
Um, and so this is the first time I'm hearing about it. Um, I think there's a number of ways to look at it. Obviously, the TikTok phenomenon is important.
143
00:22:01.653 --> 00:22:07.224
Um, and the way in which I think I've started to understand some of these things is that you can't understand this just from user behavior alone.
144
00:22:07.264 --> 00:22:19.063
It's that brands are spending a lot of money on content that's optimized for these platforms, and in many cases, they wanna take those learnings and then spread them out across a number of different contexts, right?
145
00:22:19.144 --> 00:22:24.144
So you don't wanna just, like, put all your ads on Snap for Stories, um, or Stories on Snap rather.
146
00:22:24.584 --> 00:22:30.884
You wanna be able to then also bring that content to your Instagram audience and to, um, your YouTube audience and so on, right?
147
00:22:30.944 --> 00:22:37.144
So the move to vertical video actually harmed YouTube in a lot of ways because it was so optimized for horizontal content.
148
00:22:37.224 --> 00:22:57.604
Um, and so, you know, I don't know if this Firework thing is about getting some product people that have proven execution, know how to work with, um, creators, and basically are, are, um, being groomed for, uh, a new expansion in the YouTube universe, um, or if this would be its own kind of, you know, app within the Google sphere.
149
00:22:57.684 --> 00:23:10.604
Um, it's been interesting to watch sort of adjacent to this space, and this is sort of what I'm thinking about from a media and advertising perspective, the way in which, uh, Google itself has created its own Stories, um, format or AMP Stories.
150
00:23:11.084 --> 00:23:14.024
Um, i- in fact, if you go and you search for, um,
151
00:23:15.084 --> 00:23:29.004
uh, actors or actresses, um, in the Google iOS app, um, occasionally there'll be a, a little promo to sort of view this story or something, and it'll actually be sort of a full-page interactive click-through experience that's very much like an Instagram or a Snap story.
152
00:23:29.484 --> 00:23:37.444
So Google is trying to find ways of bringing in these formats which appeal to and then allow their ad teams to then sell these, uh, as products.
153
00:23:37.924 --> 00:23:49.404
So this could be a way of actually taking the learnings from Firework and, you know, spending $100 million or whatever it is, um, to essentially get those learnings inside of Google is, you know, chump change relative to the advertising that they might make from it.
154
00:23:49.724 --> 00:23:52.164
And so that seems to be where this might be going.
155
00:23:52.504 --> 00:24:02.290
Now, uh, like, I guess what I'm trying to understand is if TikTok itself is going to be a lasting phenomenon, if it is- Truly about a new media format, a new media expression.
156
00:24:02.380 --> 00:24:16.260
Um, or if it's just, you know, chasing a trend and, um, you know, the, the half-life of that trend maybe for like another two years or something, and then TikTok itself will fade off, um, because people will be sort of like bored and they'll be looking for more immersive experiences.
157
00:24:16.620 --> 00:24:24.280
Well, to- just to give people a bit more background, so Firework's brand partners, uh, apparently are, um, Refinery29, Amazon Music, NBC Universal.
158
00:24:24.780 --> 00:24:29.980
Uh, the people behind the app, um, are former execs from LinkedIn and Snapchat themselves.
159
00:24:30.080 --> 00:24:40.700
Um, and one of the things that they're saying that sets themselves apart from the rest is that it's got some, uh, technology that they call Reveal that lets users both shoot and view video content horizontally as well.
160
00:24:41.060 --> 00:24:50.340
Uh- Hmm... a break from the vertical video formats that, that others have had. Um, so yeah, you know, this is a question I get asked all the time in terms of TikTok, you know, is this just a, a phase?
161
00:24:50.410 --> 00:24:58.880
Is this just kind of a, a kind of a viral trend and interest in this kind of content that will fade out, or will it have the, um, stamina to, to last out?
162
00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:15.340
Um, and I think the jury's still out on it, but it certainly is very interesting to see that there's now not just TikTok that's out there, that there is another app, um, that's fighting for this space and, and soon to be Byte as well, which given that what Vine was like and my enjoyment of that, I'm looking forward to that as well.
163
00:25:15.460 --> 00:25:26.190
So we will see. Um, a- another thing we wanted to talk about in talking about TikTok is, um, the, um, plans for itself to not be involved in political advertising anymore. Hmm.
164
00:25:26.260 --> 00:25:44.560
And as we've talked about in previous episodes of this podcast, you know, the whole regulation space and, uh, the area of kind of who's the arbiter of truth and who makes these decisions on what we hear and see, um, should it be a tech company, should it be government making decis- decisions or not, is come into the space of TikTok, which is gonna face more of this.
165
00:25:44.620 --> 00:25:55.040
So Martyn, what's this story about? This ties in quite interestingly with, uh, a lot of the discussion that's been happening this week around censorship and self-censorship around the Hong Kong protests.
166
00:25:55.420 --> 00:26:11.560
So we've seen, uh, the NBA, we've seen Blizzard Entertainment involved in, uh, uh, controversies around, uh, protests against, uh, kind of in support of the Hong Kong protesters, and then how those companies have, uh, dealt with the people who made those, uh, protests.
167
00:26:11.600 --> 00:26:23.220
Now, obviously, TikTok on the other hand, is a Chinese-owned app, and, uh, there have been, uh, reports recently about, uh, Hong Kong-related, uh, content being suppressed on there.
168
00:26:23.540 --> 00:26:35.920
Uh, basically like any, uh, app, uh, c- coming from China would. Uh, you know, they, they like to keep the, the, quite literally the, the party line on it. But, um, what's interesting is how this kinda works.
169
00:26:35.960 --> 00:26:40.880
Well, basically what they've done is they've said they're not gonna have any political content at all. Any political content.
170
00:26:40.960 --> 00:26:55.440
So it can be, you know, the most innocent, uh, kind of pro, uh, you know, it could be pro-Donald Trump, it could be pro whoever his rival is in the, the pri- uh, in the, uh, presidential elections or, you know, whatever country, whatever your political message, no, you can't do it on TikTok.
171
00:26:55.820 --> 00:27:07.640
Um, which, uh, gets around, uh, any problems they might have with people criticizing them about censoring any political protests, uh, related to China, 'cause basically all content relating to politics is gone.
172
00:27:07.960 --> 00:27:14.280
Um, I think it fits. It certainly fits the vibe of, uh, TikTok. You go onto TikTok for entertainment.
173
00:27:14.360 --> 00:27:24.840
You don't necessarily want to be getting into a, a big argument and, uh, Twitter would certainly be a different kind [laughs] of place if all political discussion was banned. Um, so, uh, so yeah, um, Matt, your thoughts?
174
00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:26.620
Yeah, I, I agree.
175
00:27:26.700 --> 00:27:38.560
I think that, um, it doesn't feel right, um, or fitting for, for a platform like TikTok to be a space where, uh, and there's political, um, kind of propaganda or, or advertising, whatever you wanna call it, in that space.
176
00:27:38.600 --> 00:27:49.390
So in, in some ways, it, yeah, it doesn't fit to have that in there. Mm-hmm. And I think it, it's a, it's a nice, um, big sidestep for them, as you say, for, to avoid the, the challenges and, and issues- Yeah...
177
00:27:49.440 --> 00:27:50.750
that Facebook is facing in this space.
178
00:27:50.750 --> 00:27:59.520
I should, I should, I sh- I should be clear that it is a ban on political advertising rather than political content g- that's generated by users, which may create a bit of a gray area there.
179
00:27:59.600 --> 00:28:03.580
Uh, but at the same time, it sets a tone, I think, for what we see on the platform. Yeah, no, I think so.
180
00:28:03.640 --> 00:28:25.440
And I, I, I just think, um, the, the, uh, this is one of the hardest places to be in as a, an executive of a social network right now in terms of what role does your platform have in terms of choosing, uh, or moderating, uh, or censoring content that has a political tone to it or is paid for advertising from a political party.
181
00:28:25.520 --> 00:28:31.160
Um, this has been a big discussion on this podcast for the last few weeks. So Chris, what, what do you think about all of this stuff?
182
00:28:31.300 --> 00:28:41.080
Yeah, it's, I think it's really fascinating, um, because what's unclear is, you know, whether or not this is purely a business decision or if it's something that is more philosophical or cultural.
183
00:28:41.760 --> 00:28:50.890
Um, you know, like to understand Twitter, you have to understand that Jack Dorsey himself was a free speech advocate, and a lot of the early engineers at Twitter, uh, were the same.
184
00:28:51.130 --> 00:29:00.140
And they were looking at building a, a platform and a product that was decentralized, um, at least in the early days, and was intended to be something that would be all for free speech and protest.
185
00:29:00.600 --> 00:29:10.980
Um, so it's quite different than you can imagine TikTok, which seems to be very much about, uh, creating a commercial product that's about fun and entertainment, and therefore has a very different slant when it comes to advertising.
186
00:29:11.420 --> 00:29:22.500
Um, the other thing to consider is the amount of, you know, whether, whether this is a consideration or not, I don't know, but the amount of money that is spent on filtering a lot of this content from these platforms is enormous.
187
00:29:22.800 --> 00:29:29.020
Um, you know, uh, Facebook has said, of course, that they spend more than Twitter makes, um, on, you know, spam and abuse.
188
00:29:29.420 --> 00:29:37.480
And so if TikTok can actually just kick that content or its advertising like off the platform, then that means that they have to do a lot less, uh, mediation and worrying about it.
189
00:29:37.740 --> 00:29:48.600
And it may also be the case that they have a far more draconian approach to anything that gets flagged, you know, because there is no expectation that your content will be seen by anybody on TikTok because it's all algo- al- algorithmic.
190
00:29:48.920 --> 00:29:52.640
That just means that like if someone blocks something, well, they'll just like kick it out of the algorithm and it won't be shown.
191
00:29:53.080 --> 00:30:08.940
So there's an interesting element here a- around freedom, freedom of expression, around the ability for you to raise your voice and to have your voice be heard in a context where your ability to, to be heard is not as guaranteed as it is on other platforms or, or contexts.
192
00:30:09.328 --> 00:30:31.778
So I think this is, like, a pretty big deal, and I think it's a pretty big shift, and this is particularly important given what we've learned or seen, you know, since twenty sixteen, you know, when we sort of had this, like, wake-up moment where it's like, "Oh, yeah, these things, these platforms can be weaponized against, um, the, the people i-in a sense in, in changing, um, their minds, their perspective, what they see, what they think."
193
00:30:32.268 --> 00:30:39.158
Um, and we know now that all or most governments around the world are actually engaging in a type of, um... I mean, it makes sense.
194
00:30:39.228 --> 00:30:45.288
This is sort of like historically what governments do, but, um, propaganda, um, to convince people of certain ideas and things like that.
195
00:30:45.328 --> 00:30:58.968
And so if you can just sidestep that, then you can keep your, your business, I think, much leaner and much more profitable, um, and not worry about getting into, um, the, the world where users are getting stressed out, and they're finding your platform to be, um,
196
00:30:59.948 --> 00:31:05.388
just annoying because of all the, the political discourse that's, that's taking over from the kind of entertainment that you're looking for.
197
00:31:05.408 --> 00:31:09.818
And on that point quickly, um, uh, 'cause we could talk about this as well for quite a long time- [laughs]...
198
00:31:09.828 --> 00:31:20.818
is around the, um, the decision by Facebook recently, which we've talked about in a, in a previous podcast as well, uh, um, their decision that they will allow, um, political advertisers to, to basically say what they, say what they want.
199
00:31:20.868 --> 00:31:26.428
They can lie. They can say whatever they want. As long as it's, um, it meets the rest of the criteria, you can say what you want.
200
00:31:26.438 --> 00:31:35.408
And I think there's, uh- But you have to, like, look at these things as, as very different types of initiatives. Like, the way that I understand Facebook and Zuckerberg is that Zuckerberg is building an empire.
201
00:31:35.468 --> 00:31:37.848
He wants to build something that rivals the Ottoman Empire.
202
00:31:38.168 --> 00:31:50.248
So when we look back 100 or 1,000 years on the Facebook era, like, that is how we will understand the, the rise of this global phenomenon, whereas TikTok, you know, maybe wants to be like a city state and basically wants to keep the people happy.
203
00:31:50.328 --> 00:31:59.648
You know, it's like Bhutan or something where it's like, you know, they measure the gross na- national happiness as opposed to trying to create some legal system or framework that works in all parts of the world.
204
00:31:59.708 --> 00:32:15.968
So I think you have to take a, a, a geopolitical and historical perspective of these things to really understand, uh, the pressures that are both on them and what they're willing to, uh, deal with in order to create more value and to capture more of the population's kind of, you know, consciousness, awareness, or attention.
205
00:32:16.168 --> 00:32:26.167
And finally this week, Instagram's Following, uh, tab, this part of the Activity tab, is finally being culled and killed away. Uh, Martin, what, what's the background on this?
206
00:32:26.528 --> 00:32:36.447
Yeah, so I'll be honest, I did not know about this. I obviously have been using Instagram since, you know, just after it launched. Um, as soon as I could get my hands on it, I was using it. But
207
00:32:37.488 --> 00:32:40.028
I'll be honest, I never knew this Following tab was there.
208
00:32:40.068 --> 00:32:48.248
Basically, this, this was a feed that, uh, you could obviously see your own notifications, but if you s- uh, switched to Following, you'd see, uh, what other people were liking and commenting.
209
00:32:48.257 --> 00:33:00.008
And, uh, some people, uh, found, uh, kind of voyeuristic pleasure out of, uh, looking at the kinds of photos people were maybe liking without realizing that it was being, uh, fed out publicly.
210
00:33:00.228 --> 00:33:09.197
Uh, but yeah, somehow I just never-- I saw the, the, the follow, the word following and thought it was just notifications about people I was following and what they were doing. I don't know.
211
00:33:09.248 --> 00:33:13.248
I just never even bothered tapping it to see what it did, and, uh, I feel like I missed out now.
212
00:33:13.368 --> 00:33:21.988
I saw it for about 30 seconds after, uh, I read that news article, and then later in the day, I checked it, and it had gone. So, uh, so yeah, uh, sad times for some people.
213
00:33:22.048 --> 00:33:28.878
Uh, certainly, uh, the way some people use Facebook might change, and it, it certainly, it helps to not feel so watched.
214
00:33:29.288 --> 00:33:37.688
And maybe [laughs] also the other thing is maybe a lot of people don't realize that you can get exactly the same thing for Twitter in TweetDeck. Well, I, uh, on this point, it's, for me it's two things.
215
00:33:37.808 --> 00:33:48.008
One is, i-it's expelling a, a feature that clearly people weren't aware of, and you're a good example of that from what you've just said, um, and getting rid of the bloat in-inside of the app.
216
00:33:48.088 --> 00:33:51.608
And secondly, I just think it's a, it's a sign of the times. It's the climate we're in.
217
00:33:51.668 --> 00:34:00.688
You know, this is just something that's raw and ready for, for a BuzzFeed article or a Daily Mail to kind of go to town on in terms of, "How did you know you were doing this?
218
00:34:00.728 --> 00:34:08.088
And it reveals all of this information about you" type scenario. So, um, I was aware that it was there, but I wasn't a heavy user of it.
219
00:34:08.548 --> 00:34:18.368
Um, and so therefore, when it, uh, I heard that this was happening, it, it didn't come as much of a surprise. And Chris, Chris, did you use this tab? Did you-- Were you aware of it? Were you using it?
220
00:34:18.408 --> 00:34:20.968
What do you think about it? Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I was, I was aware of it.
221
00:34:21.108 --> 00:34:27.408
I would not say I was an active user of it, but I sort of, you know, liked, I did like the voyeuristic aspect of being able to go in and sort of creep on people.
222
00:34:27.848 --> 00:34:32.608
Um, there are, again, a couple different ways to look at this, and it's hard to know what was the real driver.
223
00:34:32.868 --> 00:34:41.508
Um, you know, uh, I can imagine that as Instagram has scaled, of course, over a billion users, that those queries were actually quite, uh, expensive to run.
224
00:34:41.588 --> 00:34:54.438
Um, and especially if that's a part of the app that is not getting that much attention or visits, then, you know, Facebook basically, like, looks at the math and says, "You know, we're spending $10 million a day to run these queries, and if we just remove that feature, then that'll, like, save us a little money."
225
00:34:54.448 --> 00:35:03.108
And that's not always the motivation, but I remember there were times at Google where we would, like, remove a feature or a query and, you know, we could save the company millions and millions of dollars.
226
00:35:03.898 --> 00:35:20.568
Um, and so, uh, that could be part of it, um, because there is a benefit of a feature like that for, uh, the lurkers, you know, for people who are not actively posting, who don't share to Stories, who, you know, don't really wanna be in the spotlight, so to speak, um, and are the casual users who are, let's say, contributing a lot of likes.
227
00:35:21.168 --> 00:35:23.268
Um, however, I, I think you're right.
228
00:35:23.568 --> 00:35:43.428
The, the-- Especially as Instagram continues to mature, and I think this is, like, to me the biggest question of what is Instagram twenty-twenty, um, given Threads, given the importance of Stories, given the new camera, um, given all of these things, you know, and given that the, the, the static profile itself is becoming less and less important,
229
00:35:45.048 --> 00:35:54.558
uh, what does Instagram wanna become? What does it turn into? Um, what is its future with regards to, you know, media, publishing, um, sales, marketplaces, and so on?
230
00:35:55.128 --> 00:36:07.898
Um, so that one feature, again, especially if it saves Instagram some money, allows them to remove a feature that wasn't being used that much, allows them to remove code, which, uh, a lot of these platforms really like to do, um, 'cause it reduces complexity and so on, um,
231
00:36:09.088 --> 00:36:16.568
what does it say about where the product is going? And what does it say about, let's say, private sharing or things like that and what people are actually engaging, you know, for?
232
00:36:16.608 --> 00:36:18.668
And actually, actually, that's an interesting point.
233
00:36:19.298 --> 00:36:30.598
Uh, now that I think about it, um, one of the things that I've been noticing, uh, especially as I look at the source code, um, of Instagram, that there's a lot of stuff in there about, um, sales and about, um,
234
00:36:31.518 --> 00:36:44.118
yeah, again, like marketplace transactions. If the activity tab actually becomes less complete and starts to leave things out, then that feature actually is not, um, moder- modern- modernizing as the product changes.
235
00:36:44.558 --> 00:36:55.337
So if you have friends that are buying products, well, you know, really what Instagram wants to do, especially in the Explore tab, which apparently is where a lot of the discovery is now taking place, then you wanna see the products that your friends are buying through Instagram.
236
00:36:55.838 --> 00:37:04.918
And so that, uh, feature itself may not have made sense as Instagram becomes a place for more and more complex types of activities as opposed to just sharing photos.
237
00:37:04.958 --> 00:37:12.278
So that's the thing that I would be watching for is like, what does the removal of that feature make room for that was not currently being supported in the app? Got you.
238
00:37:12.318 --> 00:37:25.298
Well, I, I, like that stuff then for me is, is the things that's gonna be a, a lot of discussion points for, for next year because Instagram particularly, we've seen over 2019 the shopping area is where they're clearly focusing a lot of their efforts.
239
00:37:25.378 --> 00:37:33.798
So, uh, if we come back for season two, which I think we probably will, um, I think we'll be- [laughs]... discussing that, that, uh, into, into the next year ahead as well.
240
00:37:34.478 --> 00:37:42.978
We'll chat more with Chris in just a moment, but first, Geek Out with Matt Navarro is sponsored by Pinterest, and each week we share tips to help you make the most of the platform.
241
00:37:42.988 --> 00:37:50.678
Now, Pinterest has always been the home of shopping inspiration. It's a place where people search, browse, shop, and discover new and favorite brands.
242
00:37:51.178 --> 00:38:00.058
Over the past few years, Pinterest has been introducing new visual discovery tools and making the content on Pinterest, pins, more shoppable so Pinners can bring their dreams to life.
243
00:38:00.398 --> 00:38:07.458
And new features are being introduced, such as a new, more dynamic business profile that brings business pins and products to the front and center.
244
00:38:07.498 --> 00:38:15.928
When you get a free business profile, you'll see a dedicated shop tab, which enables people to shop items directly from the business profile, driving traffic to retailers' sites.
245
00:38:15.958 --> 00:38:25.298
With this redesign, businesses can also customize their profile cover imagery with video or images to more effectively highlight their brand story and engage Pinners.
246
00:38:25.598 --> 00:38:34.358
Pinterest continues to unveil more features to allow Pinners to shop and for businesses to reach people who want to go from dreaming to decision-making, from inspiration to purchase.
247
00:38:34.658 --> 00:38:40.098
So you can upload your catalog of products to enable the business profile shop at business.pinterest.com.
248
00:38:40.618 --> 00:38:53.358
So Chris, people are saying, um, or at least I'm reading into the fact that people are saying that social media and social networks are broken, that the system is broken, the, the, the platforms are broken. Do you agree?
249
00:38:55.158 --> 00:39:01.878
[sighs] I mean, it's like deep breath, um, because there's a lot in that statement and it-- this is a very subjective feeling.
250
00:39:02.358 --> 00:39:08.698
Um, one of the things, again, during my walkabout has been trying to get a sense for whether or not this feeling is shared universally.
251
00:39:09.118 --> 00:39:19.878
And what is hard for me to, I think, separate is that which people are reading about social media in the press and then feeling that anxiety rise versus like what is their actual experience of it.
252
00:39:20.298 --> 00:39:27.818
And so I think that there's two parts of it. On the one hand, there is a bit of determinism based on what you read and, and being like, "Oh, yeah, you're right. I am spending a lot of time on my phone."
253
00:39:28.338 --> 00:39:32.258
But on the other hand, it's also a choice that people are making, um, on how to spend their time.
254
00:39:32.398 --> 00:39:44.978
And we've benefited in so many ways through these, like, social technologies and being able to connect with and find people around the world that previously would've been incredibly expensive, incredibly time-consuming, and very difficult to do.
255
00:39:45.018 --> 00:39:59.398
But maybe now we're moving to an era where we take that for granted and we're looking at the secondary effects and the, um, sort of anxiety that is produced through, you know, FOMO, fear of missing out, um, or through being tethered to our devices and our phones.
256
00:39:59.808 --> 00:40:04.538
So is it social media itself that's broken? Um, I don't, I don't know that it's, like, broken.
257
00:40:04.658 --> 00:40:17.778
I think everything is a little bit broken, and we're constantly in the process of fixing it and, you know, patching over things that weren't working before and learning about what's good and learning about what's not, not, and realizing that, um, perhaps we've gone through a period of
258
00:40:18.918 --> 00:40:29.128
naiveté, um, when it comes to these platforms. And certainly, um, a lot of these platforms weren't actually built with the protections in place to prevent against or to fight against bad actors.
259
00:40:29.478 --> 00:40:40.258
But now that those bad actors have shown up because we've created this information and attention economy where you have to be polarizing, you know, and aggressive to kind of get that attention, people are realizing that actually that makes them feel not great.
260
00:40:40.738 --> 00:40:51.797
So there's a set of behaviors that people don't like because of the economics of the game that's been created around social media. But to me, that doesn't say that the social media or technology itself is what's broken.
261
00:40:51.858 --> 00:41:00.618
I think the way in which people are using it in a way that, um, is ignorant of the overall ecosystem or which places them outside of that ecosystem is actually the root of the problem.
262
00:41:00.838 --> 00:41:12.358
Social media certainly isn't what it used to be, uh, with, you know, the calls for regulation, fears about its impact on mental health, challenges of fake news and misinformation, distrust of platforms themselves and their founders, all of that.
263
00:41:12.658 --> 00:41:16.658
Uh, do you think social media is at an inflection point right now? Uh, it is. Um,
264
00:41:17.658 --> 00:41:26.488
it is because perhaps it's reached some sort of asymptote, um, in terms of overall saturation of the marketplace, where now you can actually have a conversation about social media and people know what you're talking about.
265
00:41:27.018 --> 00:41:35.318
It wasn't too long ago that that wasn't the case, you know, where everyone wasn't on Twitter, where the President of the United States wasn't, um, you know, making news every day using social media.
266
00:41:35.358 --> 00:41:42.658
Like, there was a period, you know, maybe even five to six years ago where it was still, I wouldn't say, like, niche, but it was something that people kind of could ignore.
267
00:41:43.118 --> 00:41:48.378
Um, but now social media has become a lot like sports, where it's just out there, it's in the news every day.
268
00:41:48.658 --> 00:42:01.718
We know who the teams and who the players are, and so it's useful to have, uh, at least for businesses, kind of like this armchair quarterbacking and second-guessing of these major platforms, um, because now there is this common touchstone that lots of people actually understand.
269
00:42:02.238 --> 00:42:14.878
So in that sense, um, there is almost like this, um, flywheel of, you know, news and information that's been created, and it touches so many people that now we are having a shared and collective conversation about it.
270
00:42:15.398 --> 00:42:18.318
At the same time, there's still a great deal of ignorance.
271
00:42:18.478 --> 00:42:36.398
Um, in fact, there was a, a Pew study that just came out today talking a lot about digital knowledge and digital literacy, and for many, many people, they're still quite in the dark about some of the nuances and subtleties and ways of keeping themselves safe, for example, using two-factor authentication, um, that those of us who perhaps have been in this space for a lot longer know and take for granted.
272
00:42:36.858 --> 00:42:40.338
So bridging that divide of awareness, um, kind of seems to be where we're at.
273
00:42:40.398 --> 00:42:55.708
And so there's a lot of people who are joining the conversation now who are- Feeling like they should be outraged because they see a lot of outrage around them, but not fully understanding the nuances and subtleties of some of the problems in the space, especially around, um, you know, privacy, security,
274
00:42:56.868 --> 00:42:59.318
um, you know, marketplaces, influencers.
275
00:42:59.358 --> 00:43:08.498
Like, there's a lot of stuff that's all of a sudden then, and Matt, I know you've talked about this a lot, a lot of things in culture have changed really rapidly, and we don't fully know what they mean to us.
276
00:43:08.798 --> 00:43:22.878
And there's also a lot of shifts that are happening in power structures, again, especially in politics, where there's a realization that, oh, like actually, you know, the cat's out of the bag, and the ways in which we used to control the narrative or control populations aren't working as well.
277
00:43:23.218 --> 00:43:26.798
And so how do we adapt in that context? So is it at an inflection point?
278
00:43:27.338 --> 00:43:35.818
Um, perhaps, but I also think that we're gonna continue to grow in terms of adoption and use and integration of these products in our everyday lives.
279
00:43:36.358 --> 00:43:48.128
Um, and they will become more subtle, more seductive, um, more ubiquitous, and so therefore, a little less hard to control because we are going to just assume that they are sort of always around us, always on, always listening.
280
00:43:48.138 --> 00:43:55.678
And the degree to which that creates a new type of anxiety is something I don't quite know how to, you know, think about yet. Do you think that Facebook have been hard done by?
281
00:43:55.918 --> 00:44:02.498
Do you think that people have been overly critical or unfairly critical of their attempts and their efforts? Not necessarily.
282
00:44:02.558 --> 00:44:12.318
Uh, I think when you have a, a platform that grows that quickly and that does become so powerful, um, it is of course useful to first of all be skeptical, to ask questions, to try to understand.
283
00:44:12.838 --> 00:44:20.898
Um, on, on the flip side, what I've really tried to, to understand is what other ways could they have been as successful if they didn't take the approach that they did.
284
00:44:21.158 --> 00:44:33.578
I think the same thing could be said of, of Uber, um, you know, where you had existing, uh, in many cases, like the mafia and, uh, other entrenched entrants- I love that we're comparing Uber to the mafia right now.
285
00:44:34.158 --> 00:44:36.758
[laughs] No, no, no. Go on. Carry on. This is what they were against, right?
286
00:44:37.078 --> 00:44:50.248
So, so like Uber came in and said, "Look, we wanna make it possible for people to, to take a, a resting asset," which is their car, and, you know, if they happen to need some, some work, to be able to sell access to that car where they will drive them around.
287
00:44:50.638 --> 00:45:01.037
And previously, the government said, "Well, we are going to have a monopoly on transportation, and we will sell y- the ability for you to use your own car for this type of work," which is the taxi medallion system.
288
00:45:01.398 --> 00:45:07.968
And Uber said, "You know, that doesn't make sense anymore in the era of the mobile phone and GPS." Like, people can coordinate amongst themselves.
289
00:45:08.098 --> 00:45:12.098
You no longer need to have this centralized government system, um, to control access to that.
290
00:45:12.438 --> 00:45:22.738
And furthermore, the ability to track where cars go and to give people the ability to request emergency services means that the risk and the threat model is also different, but it hasn't been updated in a long time. So
291
00:45:23.658 --> 00:45:32.338
in that sense, Uber came along and said, "We can actually do this better with new technology." And the mafia and the taxi medallion owners and things like that, they just said like, "Hell no."
292
00:45:32.498 --> 00:45:40.718
Like, "We have a way that we make money by keeping supply suppressed and compressed, and therefore, we don't want you to come in and basically blow up our market."
293
00:45:41.218 --> 00:45:48.338
In a similar way, you know, Facebook has come along and changed access to information as well as the ability to publish information very, very cheaply and inexpensively.
294
00:45:48.678 --> 00:45:50.518
It used to be very expensive to publish information.
295
00:45:50.998 --> 00:46:08.158
So that has also changed the power imbalance or the power balance, um, in a way that a lot of people are starting to, I think, you know, be very confused and, and they're trying to adapt to it, and there's been a lot of, you know, new types of power brokers that have come out, like influencers, um, that are able to thrive in this environment.
296
00:46:09.078 --> 00:46:12.398
So has Facebook been given a, a hard time or too hard a time?
297
00:46:12.898 --> 00:46:33.618
Um, again, I just don't know if you can ama-- Like, there were so many competitors for so long, and Facebook kept doing a good job of both executing and also being ruthless like Microsoft was in the way that they approached the marketplace, that I just don't know if anybody else could have done it better and been more genteel about it and had the same kind of success.
298
00:46:33.698 --> 00:46:41.778
Hmm. Interesting. Well, I'm -- We're gonna go -- We're gonna have a weird change of tangent and come back to this space rather than being on the downer- Perfect... on social networks.
299
00:46:41.858 --> 00:46:50.178
I wanted to ask you a bit about what, you know, what's exciting you about social media right-- What's making you happy? What's, uh, what things are you seeing you think, "This app's really cool.
300
00:46:50.478 --> 00:46:52.588
This movement towards this is really excellent"?
301
00:46:52.818 --> 00:47:01.957
You know, we talked a bit earlier about Byte and TikTok, and we've talked about people's awareness of, of, of the, the, the, the damage sometimes spending too much time on these apps do.
302
00:47:02.378 --> 00:47:12.538
Um, and there's also just some innovative things that are going on and, and I think one of the things you've talked about before, um, we came on, um, to talk today on the podcast was about conversational technologies that you, you know, excite you.
303
00:47:12.918 --> 00:47:19.818
Tell us a bit about what's exciting you in tech. I mean, I, I, I, I prefer to choose to be an optimist, even though it's so easy and tempting to be a pessimist.
304
00:47:20.338 --> 00:47:33.498
Um, I, I think provide a great deal of snark on my Twitter feed, but a lot of it is like looking at these things and sort of on the one hand being amused by them or being amused by humans and the ways in which we get, you know, really provoked and triggered by things.
305
00:47:33.978 --> 00:47:51.238
Um, and I'm trying to imagine and think about ways in which a lot of these technologies and a lot of the efforts that people are putting into them will bring us to a place where we actually can connect more intentionally and more authentically with other people, uh, that we can also express more about ourselves in a more open way.
306
00:47:51.248 --> 00:47:55.978
I mean, one of the things that I think is happening that is a really positive aspect of social media is
307
00:47:56.938 --> 00:48:13.458
-- And I think, uh, you also see like there's another, these feel like cultural tectonic plates that are, you know, pushing up against each other, which on the one hand, um, is kind of, you know, white nationalism or that type of extremism, um, put against sort of, um, [chuckles] woke nationalism in a sense.
308
00:48:13.478 --> 00:48:26.198
Like, where there's this new cultural movement to be more inclusive, to bring people in who previously were not part of the conversation and who were largely unseen, and to give them access to the platform, to make space for them.
309
00:48:26.758 --> 00:48:44.978
And that to me is one of the more promising aspects of social media and social technology, that over time, um, we do move in a, in a more liberal, uh, direction, um, from an in-inclusivity and diversity perspective because that's actually going to be necessary in order to build technologies that are more relevant for more people.
310
00:48:45.338 --> 00:48:53.960
And if anything, one of the good aspects of capitalism, as much as a skeptic as I am of, um, industrial capitalism-[lips smack]
311
00:48:53.990 --> 00:49:01.150
You know, capitalism needs to continue to grow, and the way that you continue to grow is by building products that are more and more useful by more and more people.
312
00:49:01.170 --> 00:49:11.160
And the only way to build products that are useful by more and more people is to understand their needs, which are actually quite diverse and quite, uh, different based on their cultural context or based on their lived experience and so on.
313
00:49:11.170 --> 00:49:18.350
And so that requires these big tech, tech companies to actually learn more and become more mindful of the various lived experiences that people have.
314
00:49:18.910 --> 00:49:47.190
So, uh, one of the things that I think is very interesting about voice computing is that that's going to open up a whole new generation of people to have access to all the computing power that those of us in the West and in the developed world have had access to for quite a while, and they, I, I think, will be able to interact with technology in a way that feels very natural and very human and doesn't require them to go through the same evolutionary process of, let's say, learning to type or, or learning to modify the way that you communicate to fit the needs of the computer.
315
00:49:48.030 --> 00:49:51.220
So that, I think, is, is, is what I'm most interested in.
316
00:49:51.650 --> 00:50:01.750
And then there's a whole other aspect which is about, again, self-expression, and the ways in which I'm seeing young people, um, express themselves through stories or through short-form videos or to just explore and express
317
00:50:02.670 --> 00:50:14.190
new ways of self-identity through even 3D technology, um, or even, like, deepfakes, but applied in a, in a positive way to tell new types of stories, um, are all areas that I find really interesting and really promising.
318
00:50:14.570 --> 00:50:22.950
And, and we, we talked, um, um, when we were in Australia, um, recently when we were together about the, um, business models, um, of, um, some of these social networks.
319
00:50:23.010 --> 00:50:40.770
And, and it, it, to me anyway, it led to quite a fascinating discussion about the opposing objectives and, and desires between what Facebook's there to do for its shareholders, um, for there for it for what advertisers want, what now what regulators need, and what users are there to, to gain from being on the networks.
320
00:50:40.790 --> 00:50:54.830
And so, uh, I think it would be quite interesting to air that conversation in a, in a quick sense, uh, with the audience here about, you know, can a company like Facebook balance the needs of all these groups, and, uh, can a, a paid version ever exist of a social network?
321
00:50:54.910 --> 00:50:59.490
Uh, you know, what, what are the core issues here around these kind of discussions and these decisions?
322
00:51:00.050 --> 00:51:10.690
Well, um, yeah, like I, I think it's a really fascinating question, um, because one of the things that you see is being discussed is whether or not users should be paid for their data, for example.
323
00:51:11.170 --> 00:51:29.430
Um, you know, in, I think, 2008, I was writing about this idea when I was working on digital identity that I called data capital, and my assumption and, and assessment was that, um, the data that we are accruing about ourselves, uh, our, our behavioral data, uh, whether it's, you know, tweets or whether it's our GPS location or things like that, um,
324
00:51:30.410 --> 00:51:40.080
al-allows companies to actually build a pretty good model of what we're into, which then should, um, create, uh, a media environment that is actually personalized and customized to us.
325
00:51:40.550 --> 00:51:59.470
So both we're seeing a lot of those things that are irrelevant to our interests and so therefore are like ads that we would never click on, um, to a media environment in which we are seeing things that are, you know, well-targeted, and so therefore, the person who's paying for that ad is actually paying for something that is effective and is being, um, shown to the people that actually might have an interest.
326
00:51:59.570 --> 00:52:05.550
And then it's up to the user to think, "Do I have a need for that right now? Do I have a desire for that? Do I wanna say yes to that?"
327
00:52:06.000 --> 00:52:11.379
And that moves us into a world that's a lot more, um, consensual, um, from a manipulation perspective.
328
00:52:11.870 --> 00:52:27.310
The flip side of that is that there, you know, really bad advertising ends up becoming coercive and actually erodes your sense of freedom and sovereignty by manipulating you in a way that doesn't feel good, that sort of, you know, again, plays on your psychological, um, weaknesses.
329
00:52:27.670 --> 00:52:30.210
Anyways, I'm sort of, like, going off on a little tangent there, but
330
00:52:31.170 --> 00:52:38.610
this question of whether people should be paid for their data is interesting because I would say that influencers are people who are being paid for their data.
331
00:52:38.650 --> 00:52:44.230
It just so happens that their data is a list of followers that are watching what they do and are learning from them.
332
00:52:44.270 --> 00:52:59.850
So there is a set of users on social media that are already being paid for what they do in their natural lives, and the problem is that not everyone that is using social media are producing data that is equally sort of, uh, valuable to, to everybody else.
333
00:53:00.400 --> 00:53:09.190
And that creates, I think, a real tension because there becomes this sort of expectation or norm that, well, you know, I should be paid for my data because they're advertising to me, and I'm not getting any benefit from that.
334
00:53:09.569 --> 00:53:20.170
And yet the baseline amount of value that each of us gets for using these platforms and services for free, you know, could be in the tens of thousands of dollars, um, you know, if you were to think about it in real terms.
335
00:53:20.650 --> 00:53:34.650
But as we know, we're in an information economy and an attention economy, and so therefore, we are essentially given a universal basic income of access to these internet services, um, in exchange for our eyeballs, our time, um, you know, and our interests.
336
00:53:35.290 --> 00:53:41.910
Do, do you think it makes sense for, for Facebook to ever charge for anything, or do you think they'll never charge for anything? Can, can you see that happening?
337
00:53:42.890 --> 00:53:49.190
No, I don't see it happening, and I think the reason is because of what I said before, which is that capitalism requires growth. And the
338
00:53:50.490 --> 00:53:54.970
m-most of the developed world, I would say, is pretty saturated with Facebook, and so they're not gonna get growth there.
339
00:53:55.360 --> 00:54:04.190
And so the market, you know, the, the, the, the stockholders, the investors, you know, the pension funds and so on, um, need Facebook to continue to grow.
340
00:54:04.230 --> 00:54:12.120
And so, um, uh, uh, for Facebook to grow at the scale it needs to grow, it, it's going to go to the developing world.
341
00:54:12.670 --> 00:54:20.810
And in the developing world, people have even less money to spend on things like subscriptions and, and so on. And so Facebook needs to be free to continue to attract more users.
342
00:54:21.350 --> 00:54:27.300
Um, and, you know, could it charge, um, you know, access-- Like, I just...
343
00:54:27.510 --> 00:54:35.830
L-like, what it could do, and, and I think actually this is what's happening, is that Facebook becomes a conduit for commercial transactions, and that's happening in two ways.
344
00:54:35.850 --> 00:54:43.910
So number one, it's happening in Marketplace. Um, I was looking at Facebook source code last night actually, and I saw a lot of, um, changes related to selling cars through the platform.
345
00:54:44.310 --> 00:54:50.950
Now, I don't think of going to Facebook to sell a car, but in some parts of the world where... I don't even know how to buy a car anymore. I've never bought a car.
346
00:54:51.230 --> 00:55:00.076
But, like, if I were to buy a car, uh, and I, you know, Facebook was the internet to me- I might actually go to Facebook and, you know, go to the Marketplace and then sell stuff.
347
00:55:00.146 --> 00:55:05.806
Like, I don't know how successful Facebook Marketplace is, but I imagine that it's bigger than Craigslist in most of the rest of the world.
348
00:55:05.816 --> 00:55:10.926
And that's actually very, very important because for so long companies have wanted to take on Craigslist, but they've been focused on the wrong market.
349
00:55:10.966 --> 00:55:14.566
They're trying to take on Craigslist where it's an incumbent in the Western market.
350
00:55:15.326 --> 00:55:20.586
Whereas in the rest of the world, you know, eBay and the rest possibly don't have as much market share, and so Facebook has an opportunity.
351
00:55:20.906 --> 00:55:29.366
So if Facebook is actually contributing to transactions in those contexts, then it gets to do something that banks do, which is to skim a little bit off the top or take a transaction fee.
352
00:55:29.406 --> 00:55:37.546
So that's a more direct way for Facebook to charge for its platform access. And then you look even further afield and you think, "Okay, well, the next 10 years, how does Facebook make money?"
353
00:55:37.706 --> 00:55:40.886
Well, they introduce their own currency, and that's what they're doing with Libra.
354
00:55:41.366 --> 00:55:50.186
So Libra gives them both, uh, attentional and, uh, you know, access to data that the credit card companies currently have and are not really... Maybe they're regulated, so they can't do anything with it.
355
00:55:50.606 --> 00:56:02.846
Um, but Libra then becomes a way of paying Facebook, again, with your data, um, to give you a premium experience, and they don't wanna do things that are gonna erode your experience or take you out of the platform.
356
00:56:03.606 --> 00:56:12.626
And so that becomes a more, I would say, aligned way for Facebook to continue to sort of monitor you, make money from you, um, without actually eroding your experience. Hmm.
357
00:56:12.746 --> 00:56:20.546
It, it's worth noting that last year Facebook did say they would consider a paid-for version in the midst of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
358
00:56:20.946 --> 00:56:30.846
So you're saying that was probably just more a PR move, the right thing to say at that time rather than a, any serious gesture? Yeah. And I also think that they would be willing to test it.
359
00:56:31.306 --> 00:56:33.606
Um, and I think the question is, you know, where and to whom?
360
00:56:33.866 --> 00:56:44.406
And over and over again, I think what you see is that only the very, very wealthy, and that, you know, doesn't have to mean that you're a super rich person, um, are willing to pay for, um, software.
361
00:56:44.746 --> 00:57:07.166
I think it was significant when, for example, Tim Ferriss did, uh, an experiment of, of, of having a, a pro or ad-free version of his podcast and realized that, you know, in terms of those who are willing to pay, it just didn't make sense economically because, you know, there were some people who actually appreciated the ads, they liked the ads, like, you know, they're getting benefit from that, and the amount of overhead that I was taking to sort of like, you know, produce two podcasts or whatever just wasn't worth it, whatever it was.
362
00:57:07.586 --> 00:57:21.136
Now, I'm not saying that that generalizes to everywhere, but over and over and over again, what I've seen is that it's incredibly hard to get people to pay for things, and it's incredibly hard if your business model requires you to continue to grow and to have new users if you're not free.
363
00:57:21.846 --> 00:57:27.406
So that to me is the fundamental tension. Are there aspects of Facebook that they might charge for? Well, they already charge for ads.
364
00:57:27.906 --> 00:57:34.486
Um, just whether or not they'll ever charge the consumers, you know, who are looking at those ads for the product, uh, remains to be seen.
365
00:57:34.806 --> 00:57:39.406
So a lot has been made, uh, of the shift towards private groups and encrypted messaging.
366
00:57:39.546 --> 00:57:49.486
Do you think this is a worrying shift from a, from a technologist's point of view and from a, like, a social point of view, or is it something that's natural and a workable evolution of social media?
367
00:57:49.626 --> 00:57:56.026
What, what do you see as the, the problems and the benefits of a move towards encryption? I think it depends culturally on what your goals are.
368
00:57:56.306 --> 00:58:06.626
Um, I think, you know, in a way, obviously given the reaction that we've seen recently from big government saying, "Don't encrypt," um, [chuckles] they are obviously looking at those messages.
369
00:58:07.056 --> 00:58:13.466
And so you have to sort of suddenly be, like, wary to say, "Well, would I rather have Facebook look at my messages or the government?"
370
00:58:14.006 --> 00:58:22.446
Um, and since Facebook doesn't have the ability to enforce laws, you know, the government having a backdoor access to your messages because they're not encrypted, you know, suddenly should give you pause.
371
00:58:22.966 --> 00:58:33.706
Um, so that's, I think, a big concern. Um, the other thing, again, as I talked about with the removal of the activity feed, the friends activity feed from Instagram as being a way of saving some money, um,
372
00:58:34.746 --> 00:58:41.066
the amount of money, again, and resources that are spent on monitoring these channels is only going to continue and to increase.
373
00:58:41.546 --> 00:58:55.906
And given that these products have billions of users, the amount of, uh, resources that have to be spent on monitoring those channels, um, especially in languages that, you know, are not English, uh, goes up, I, I think, um,
374
00:58:56.986 --> 00:59:05.066
well, astronomically as the service continues to grow and gain users. So that's gotta be a concern and a consideration, um, w- with where this goes in the future.
375
00:59:05.106 --> 00:59:10.766
So on the one hand, you can make the privacy argument, um, and think that they're doing this for, you know, your interests.
376
00:59:11.306 --> 00:59:22.286
But on the other hand, you have to look at, like, well, actually from a logistical perspective, how much does it cost to keep these messages unencrypted given that every government in the world is gonna wanna have access to this stuff?
377
00:59:22.306 --> 00:59:25.616
And if you can say, "I'm sorry, we don't have access. We threw away the key.
378
00:59:25.626 --> 00:59:44.486
You know, only the users have the keys," now the governments have to look elsewhere, and that puts, like, companies like Apple in an interesting, uh, place because now from an end-to-end encryption perspective, the place in which you gain access to a user's messages is through the device itself, for example, through reading the screen with a screen reader.
379
00:59:45.286 --> 00:59:50.486
Um, and so now Facebook is not in that position anymore, and they can basically say, you know, "This isn't our problem."
380
00:59:50.546 --> 00:59:55.106
Um, I also think that this, this move to smaller groups is incredibly important for a number of reasons.
381
00:59:55.186 --> 01:00:11.746
First of all, it's where most of, I think, a lot of the engagement is moving on Facebook because the large, you know, kind of, uh, public square context has become so messy and so difficult to follow and just full of provocaca- pr- provocations that that's where people are feeling the most stress.
382
01:00:12.366 --> 01:00:20.005
But people go into smaller groups, and now you're having more civil conversations, the conversations that people actually want to have, and that's incredibly important for Facebook's future.
383
01:00:20.026 --> 01:00:27.446
So their group strategy, I think, is, is, uh, is, um, built upon that. Um, and, and, and you hear them talking about it.
384
01:00:27.786 --> 01:00:31.386
Where I don't know and what I don't know how this is, you know, sort of builds out and fleshes out, like,
385
01:00:32.346 --> 01:00:49.526
you know, is, is where you had Boz on the show, um, where this goes with regards to augmented reality and virtual reality if those spaces become, like, where you're spending most of your time, and the blue app and the feed and the kind of two-dimensional social media context sort of fades to the distance in the next 10 to 15 years.
386
01:00:49.926 --> 01:00:51.386
And I think that's what they're building towards.
387
01:00:51.446 --> 01:01:02.646
So tell me a little bit about s- some stuff to do with you in design, because I know that you've got quite a, an interest in, in the design and the UI and the UX, these lovely terminologies that we hear as well.
388
01:01:03.006 --> 01:01:14.786
You know, is there anything that in the last sort of year that's caught your eye in terms of what you would call a trend in, in de- design of social media apps or apps in general, or things that you thought, "That was pretty damn clever they've-- what they've done there"?
389
01:01:14.886 --> 01:01:24.526
You know, w- what things are interesting to you in that space? I think the, the thing that I'm, uh, paying the most attention to is- I think really is the, the transformation of Facebook.
390
01:01:25.006 --> 01:01:37.786
Um, and I say that because at least two, if not more, of Facebook's original product leaders, um... Well, we know, for example, that the, um, co-founders of Instagram left. We know that Chris Cox left.
391
01:01:38.186 --> 01:01:50.846
We know that a bunch of people who were really, really instrumental to the Facebook that we've known for the last decade or more, um, are no longer there, and that, that actually is a really, really big deal, um, in a, in a way in which, you know, we can't...
392
01:01:50.926 --> 01:01:52.066
I don't think you can underline enough.
393
01:01:52.486 --> 01:02:04.826
Um, and I say that because people keep talking about the things that Zuckerberg has done in the past around News Feed and, you know, um, the decision to build a product around that, and I, I don't think it's sufficient to, to give him all the credit.
394
01:02:05.206 --> 01:02:16.456
I think he had a lot of really, really smart deputies that were looking at user behavior, were talking to users, were understanding those things, and so then the question is, well, you know, what does Facebook or what does Zuckerberg specifically think about where this is going?
395
01:02:16.746 --> 01:02:26.036
And we know that, you know, Facebook, one, sort of surfs user behavior and kind of l- moves to where they see things happening, um, in, in, like, an anticipatory way,
396
01:02:26.986 --> 01:02:37.386
as opposed to inventing brand-new media experiences that kind of copy what's already out there, which is actually quite savvy, um, even if, you know, we as kind of intellectual purists think that it's, uh, a type of stealing.
397
01:02:38.366 --> 01:02:45.406
Um, so I think that's interesting, um, and the way in which they're going to merge all these different messaging experiences together is interesting.
398
01:02:45.846 --> 01:02:54.386
Perhaps a place where I am seeing, uh, design and UX unfold in a way that's a little bit intimidating and, like, uh,
399
01:02:55.286 --> 01:03:06.526
mystical, um, is in the very subtle and quiet way in which, um, Instagram story filters are being created and Snapchat 3D filters are being created.
400
01:03:06.826 --> 01:03:11.896
There's a whole underground economy that's happening there that I have not seen the media really grab onto because, [laughs]
401
01:03:12.226 --> 01:03:19.366
I think this is my biggest concern and, and critique of the media, is that the media likes to talk about themselves and about how they use the media and, and how they use social media.
402
01:03:20.026 --> 01:03:26.726
None of them are using face filters. None of them are actually u- you know, in these, like, private groups. I know, Matt, obviously you run the Social Media Geek Out.
403
01:03:27.126 --> 01:03:32.566
Um, but I don't know to what degree people are immersing themselves in rich media experiences.
404
01:03:33.026 --> 01:03:45.546
Um, and what I'm seeing is that there's a lot of machine learning and artificial intelligence and, um, augmented reality that younger people in particular are experimenting with, and you can see it with Memojis and things like that.
405
01:03:45.666 --> 01:03:55.626
Um, and you can also actually... This is maybe, uh, this is a little less design, but I think it is related to design, that the design of social software is happening in more and more subtle and subdued ways.
406
01:03:56.606 --> 01:04:17.826
Um, one very specific example of that is iOS 13's, um, messaging app, where for the very first time in the entire history of that app, which has been there for who knows how long and used to integrate with AOL and whatever, um, you can now set a profile photo that gets shared with other people on iMessage, and for the default, it's actually your Memoji,
407
01:04:18.726 --> 01:04:22.026
and that's very important because that has a lot to do with the Apple Arcade.
408
01:04:22.046 --> 01:04:32.386
And as Apple moves towards a services model where you're always connected and you're connecting to other people and sharing with other people within the Apple universe, the way in which you represent yourself in that space is important.
409
01:04:32.906 --> 01:04:41.486
So I'm looking at that and I'm looking at Bitmoji and I'm looking at actually... Well, Facebook has their own kind of avatars that are, like, legless or something. I don't know. I saw that, like, recently.
410
01:04:41.566 --> 01:05:08.946
Um, the ways in which people present themselves online digitally is this incredibly interesting digital challenge, and culturally, you know, as that expands into the entire world, how you represent yourself online is going to determine so much about you, and you're going to align yourself with Apple or Google or Facebook or Snapchat, like, for the rest of your digital life, and that, I think, is where there's a lot of interesting stuff happening this year that's going to be incredibly important in 2020.
411
01:05:09.146 --> 01:05:18.875
Yeah. Th- I, I had an experience with this, uh, last week. Um, I was, uh... I got a message, an iMessage from someone at the BBC saying, "Would you come on to talk about, uh, Facebook encryption?" Funnily enough.
412
01:05:19.266 --> 01:05:21.086
Um, and I was saying, "Oh, sorry, I can't do it.
413
01:05:21.206 --> 01:05:29.706
Uh, I'm traveling today," blah, blah, blah, and I sent the message, and then, uh, for the first time, uh, since I upgraded to iOS 13, it said, "Do you want to send them your- Yes... uh, your picture?"
414
01:05:29.946 --> 01:05:39.126
So I, I would- Right... be sending them my, my, uh, Memoji. And I'm like- Yeah... I don't really want to 'cause I don't feel like I've done enough work on this to share it beyond my own phone.
415
01:05:39.415 --> 01:05:47.006
[laughs] I feel like, especially if I'm gonna be sending it in a professional capacity. And now you will. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. It's also, it's also a n- a naked selfie, which is the Memoji.
416
01:05:47.126 --> 01:05:50.336
[laughs] So probably that's why he doesn't wanna do it. Go on. Yeah.
417
01:05:50.406 --> 01:06:04.646
It is an interesting, interesting, uh, behavioral nudge there to get me to, to spend more time on that and think about, uh, just what is in a way a silly little digital avatar in a way, uh, think of it actually as something that, that represents me, yeah, and h- how I use that, yeah.
418
01:06:05.066 --> 01:06:15.846
Chris, I was just gonna k- ask you. Do, do you see F- Facebook's direct or closest rival or biggest competitor to be Apple with iMessages, or do you see it to be Google, or do you see it to be another social network?
419
01:06:16.186 --> 01:06:24.306
What, what, what do you see the main rival to, to the biggest social network on this planet? Well, it's, it's hard to say, like, rival, um, because they're all playing slightly different sports.
420
01:06:24.316 --> 01:06:30.786
You know, there's a bit of baseball, there's a bit of, you know, jujitsu, there's a bit of, you know, football and soccer, and all these things kind of mushed together.
421
01:06:30.806 --> 01:06:36.346
So it's hard to say what's a direct rival or competitor because there are different features or different products that are competitive.
422
01:06:36.836 --> 01:06:46.246
Um, I think Google, you know, is probably the most, like, focused on, you know, cloud and data and search, and Facebook really isn't a search company.
423
01:06:46.306 --> 01:06:55.846
You know, like, even with their, hey, Portal feature or something, that, that to me is, is less relevant when it comes to being a general purpose, like, search utility. Facebook is really about friends.
424
01:06:55.886 --> 01:07:10.306
It's really about connecting, and so I do think that the rivalry between Facebook and Apple is, uh, is intense, and everything that Apple seems to say about privacy sort of is a shot across the bow of specifically Facebook.
425
01:07:10.906 --> 01:07:20.966
Um, and I think, uh, iMessage is, is the thing that Facebook and Zuckerberg look at the most. I mean, Zuckerberg has said it, um, on, uh, earnings calls and things like that.
426
01:07:21.006 --> 01:07:42.058
Like, that is the largest social network on the planet, and Apple is starting to move and, you know, in a very slow, slug-like way towards, you know, making that moat deeper and thicker and full of alligators because Apple recognizes that- The, the device is becoming a commodity, and the services, the digital services is where their future lies.
427
01:07:42.478 --> 01:07:53.818
And the degree to which I as a user identify myself as an Apple user versus, let's say, a Facebook user will determine where I spend my money, where I do my digital subscriptions, and so on.
428
01:07:54.398 --> 01:07:58.998
So I think that's a really, really important aspect of, of understanding kind of like the current situation.
429
01:07:59.018 --> 01:08:04.068
Whereas like, you know, there's like Microsoft and LinkedIn, but they're kind of like off to the side and they're not really in the space.
430
01:08:04.138 --> 01:08:13.818
Um, Snap is still, I think, pretty relevant, especially for young people, and as Snap moves into its hardware, um, game, you know, they're trying to figure out how to build a lasting relationship with their customers.
431
01:08:13.878 --> 01:08:25.918
Like, to me, this is all about like relationships and relationship design, and, um, the degree to which Apple is gonna continue to try to sell hardware as the core of its relationship is important, but it's insufficient.
432
01:08:26.498 --> 01:08:55.538
Um, and so, you know, for example, I think Sonos is one of the most interesting companies to look at in this space because of what they just launched, which is Sonos Flex, um, which is in the Netherlands and allows you to subscribe for 15 pounds a month to get, um, two Sonos One devices like sort of, you know, in your house, um, which of course have voice assistants on them, and maybe Sonos gets a, um, a, a royalty or a cut every time you invoke, you know, the Google Assistant or the Amazon Assistant and you buy something through them.
433
01:08:55.558 --> 01:09:01.418
Like I, I don't know, but hardware itself is no longer becoming the core way of having a relationship with these companies.
434
01:09:01.898 --> 01:09:07.718
You know, it really is about, um, having a digital relationship that expands and grows and connects you to other people.
435
01:09:08.178 --> 01:09:14.058
And so I think the, the, the rivalry between, you know, Apple and Facebook is the one that is the most important.
436
01:09:14.398 --> 01:09:23.178
And speaking about the relationship between, uh, different social networks and their users, uh, one way that relationship is maintained is through notifications.
437
01:09:23.538 --> 01:09:39.878
And, uh, certainly in the last couple of years, lots of people have talked about being bombarded with notifications and feeling kind of fatigue around that, and we've seen Google and Apple with their operating systems take steps to help reduce the stress around notifications, uh, cut them down, help people control them a bit more.
438
01:09:39.958 --> 01:09:53.018
Uh, has that, do you think, had an impact on the way that, uh, social networks stay in touch with their, uh, users? Uh, is it, uh, having an impact on, uh, engagement? Uh, or is it something that can be designed around?
439
01:09:53.358 --> 01:10:09.038
You know, this is kind of a really just like fascinating, um, maybe question of the moment or, or sort of like transitional question because we find ourselves in this place, as you suggest, that everyone wants to send you, uh, messages, uh, as notifications, as emails.
440
01:10:09.398 --> 01:10:20.758
You know, we're trying to send messages to people in all the possible ways that exist and hope that some of them, you know, maybe 1 or 2% of them actually are seen or opened. Now, that's sort of a fascinating situation.
441
01:10:20.798 --> 01:10:29.438
On the other hand, if that weren't the case, if these systems that we use weren't so aggressive in their communications, then you may never hear from them.
442
01:10:29.998 --> 01:10:37.238
Um, it's actually, you know, uh, talking about like an interesting, uh, maybe adjacent, um, example of this.
443
01:10:38.178 --> 01:10:58.598
Currently in California, um, we are going through kind of an, uh, a, a late summer heatwave, um, as we do here, and, um, last year and some years before, there's been these crazy wildfires that have happened, and, uh, largely this has been blamed on, um, our, our public utility, PG&E, um, and their equipment.
444
01:10:58.838 --> 01:11:06.518
And their equipment will overheat, and then it causes these brush fires, which then turn into these huge conflagrations, and parts of Napa have been burned and, and so on and so forth.
445
01:11:06.998 --> 01:11:14.758
And there's been, uh, criticism in the past that PG&E has not communicated sufficiently about steps that they've taken to actually like protect people.
446
01:11:15.218 --> 01:11:23.738
And so this is the first time that they are doing these rolling blackouts, these really significant blackouts, where up to 800,000 people are going to lose their power for up to three to five days.
447
01:11:24.318 --> 01:11:32.778
Um, and they've been communicating about this over the last week through text messaging, through Twitter, through social media, all these different channels.
448
01:11:33.218 --> 01:11:40.997
Now, you could argue that if PG&E were a type of app or service that you had installed on your phone and was sending all these messages in all these different channels, you'd be angry about it.
449
01:11:41.938 --> 01:11:53.398
However, obviously the criticism in the past has been that it hasn't communicated enough or sufficiently. So we are in a moment where any service or product that you use is going to attempt to talk to you all the time.
450
01:11:53.918 --> 01:12:00.327
Then the question becomes, well, how do you mediate or reduce the volume or intensity of those messages?
451
01:12:00.978 --> 01:12:11.718
And so the operating systems have responded by giving you more controls to actually change how you want those messages to be received and if you want those messages to be re-received at all.
452
01:12:12.098 --> 01:12:21.858
So for example, iOS, uh, I think as of iOS 12, provided the opportunity to have notifications be delivered quietly. So they'll still show up, but they just won't actually buzz your phone.
453
01:12:22.498 --> 01:12:29.358
So this is a, a new type of inbox. I mean, there's been a desire to kill email for a very long time, and I think in some respects that's happened. Um,
454
01:12:30.298 --> 01:12:43.618
the, the, the question then is what are the, the, the tools and ways in which you can help users manage these, these inbound messages without overwhelming them or without actually causing them to harm themselves by, let's say, just turning off all notifications altogether or always denying notifications.
455
01:12:44.218 --> 01:12:46.098
Um, and that seems to be where we're finding ourselves.
456
01:12:46.508 --> 01:12:59.178
Um, and that seems to be probably the step before we move to a more algorithmic approach to assistants that actually receive all of these messages on our behalf and then figure out how to deliver them to us in a way that would be somewhat, let's say, conversational.
457
01:12:59.758 --> 01:13:05.628
You know, like, "Hey Siri," like, "what are the notifications that I missed or that are relevant to me that I should know about?" Or, "Hey Siri," like, "I'm bored."
458
01:13:05.678 --> 01:13:07.928
Like, "What, what are the movies that are coming out this weekend?"
459
01:13:07.938 --> 01:13:20.718
And because those messages were sent to you through the Fandango app or something, now Siri can have an intelligent conversation with you based on a third party collecting a lot of data about your interests and about what you might like, and then Siri can actually have a more informed conversation with you.
460
01:13:21.418 --> 01:13:34.508
So I, I think that we had to go through the stage of message overload, where every app learned to talk in order to get to a place where we a-actually, um, turn off some of those messages and get the ones that we are interested in.
461
01:13:35.230 --> 01:13:42.450
How do you manage your digital day-to-day life in terms of, um, stopping yourself going crazy with red dots and messages and buzzing and stuff?
462
01:13:42.510 --> 01:13:47.420
Do you have any strategies or do you, uh, what-- how do, how do you decide to manage that? What, what have you done?
463
01:13:47.950 --> 01:13:53.150
I think, you know, honestly, it's a work in progress, and I would say that I am struggling, probably like a lot of people.
464
01:13:53.230 --> 01:14:05.260
Um, there are a lot of ways that you can get in touch with me, and I kind of thrive on conversation and, you know, interaction, um, possibly to [chuckles] the, you know, to, to, to degrading my productivity.
465
01:14:05.910 --> 01:14:11.130
Um, but I just, you know, I, I enjoy interacting with, with humans, with other people, um, through digital technology.
466
01:14:11.190 --> 01:14:26.030
Um, at the same time, I think I have become more aggressive about making sure that the notifications that I need to see are probably coming from real people, and those that are not, I find either ways of, again, having them delivered quietly or of being bunched or collected by group.
467
01:14:26.490 --> 01:14:27.830
Um, I--
468
01:14:28.910 --> 01:14:40.130
You know, there's a, a little clever trick which I know you can do sort of like, um, you know, manually in macOS where you can like, uh, have your notification window slide out and then there's a do not disturb feature.
469
01:14:40.570 --> 01:14:46.750
But if you hold down Option and you click the Notifications, uh, tab in the menu bar, that'll actually turn off notifications directly.
470
01:14:47.190 --> 01:14:56.270
So there's like little, you know, mini hacks like that that, um, are about being very mindful. Uh, my phone is always in Do Not Disturb mode, so [chuckles] if you even call me, it's not gonna get through.
471
01:14:56.850 --> 01:15:05.350
So there's just ways in which I've kind of silenced the aggression of those, those messages such that I can then go and review them on my terms and on my time.
472
01:15:05.950 --> 01:15:18.530
Um, I've also read books like Make Time and Nir Eyal has a new book, um, that just came out called Indistractable, and there's a lot of really great tactics and techniques in those books, um, that I've been, you know, s-slowly trying to experiment with and try.
473
01:15:19.160 --> 01:15:27.630
'Cause you can also like, um, turn your, an iPhone or on, on whatever device you're using to grayscale so you kind of don't see the red coloring for all the red dots and things like that.
474
01:15:27.710 --> 01:15:36.250
So those are sorts of things that you can do. Yeah, that's true, and, and in some ways, uh, the fact that all of my apps have red dots on them mean that I actually don't really notice them anymore.
475
01:15:36.749 --> 01:15:42.970
[chuckles] So it's sort of like a kind of blindness. Yeah. No, uh, well, I-- The thing is I, I just still have that FOMO.
476
01:15:43.150 --> 01:16:17.410
I just kind of like I'm gonna not see something that I need to see, and so I'm kind of struggling with the, the battle, I'm, um, with it, but I'm, I'm hoping twenty twenty is my-- maybe my New Year's resolution will to, to beat, to beat the red dots with- Yeah, honestly, I think like the strategy is to, to practice meditation if you don't because, uh, the more mindful I become about the ways in which I'm being manipulated and, and to the point of coercion by a lot of these little digital signifiers means that I have to do the work to like show up for myself and be like, "Actually, I don't wanna be manipulated in this way to feel that FOMO," and so the only way to get there is by increasing the strength and power of my mind.
477
01:16:17.830 --> 01:16:23.590
And the way in which I found to do that is through meditation. Meditation, people. This is what we need to do.
478
01:16:23.650 --> 01:16:34.890
[laughs] Now, l-l-- we'll go into our fin-final question, um, which I think for the final episode of the season finale is a good question to ask, especially of somebody who is the geek of all geeks, that is Chris.
479
01:16:35.270 --> 01:16:42.970
So predictions twenty twenty, what do we think will change or grow massively in the world of social media?
480
01:16:43.230 --> 01:16:59.810
You know, what are the areas that are looking likely to be the things where development's gonna be pushed forwards towards, or things that we're gonna see the likes of New York Times banging on about because Facebook isn't doing this or this needs to change, or isn't this awful that someone's doing this on social media?
481
01:17:00.310 --> 01:17:03.330
What, what do you think twenty twenty has in store for, for social media?
482
01:17:04.370 --> 01:17:27.470
You know, I think, um, because we are in this moment where there's this impeachment, um, process happening, um, i-in the Uni-United States, um, twenty twenty I think is gonna be a year where we are really going to see something of a coalescing of the, the digital realm, which has been somewhat separate in its own space with the real world.
483
01:17:27.850 --> 01:17:35.750
I think twenty sixteen was sort of a prelude and gave us a reality check that, oh my God, like actually these things are quite intertwined.
484
01:17:36.250 --> 01:17:57.570
Um, and there used to be a lot of clumsiness and ignorance, you know, with governments and with big companies and corporations kind of using these platforms, but there's been a lot of learning that's been going on and a lot of awareness about the power to control narratives and stories and consciousness, um, through these systems in the last couple years and, and, and companies are spending a lot of money to, to, to do that.
485
01:17:58.490 --> 01:18:05.310
So twenty twenty is gonna be about kind of bringing all of those things together in a way that we, you know, don't exactly know how it's going to go.
486
01:18:05.690 --> 01:18:20.030
You know, Facebook is one of the largest undemocratically elected governments in the world, and that's going to be challenged in a very real way, uh, through a lot of, uh, legal actions in the United States and in Europe and other places like that.
487
01:18:20.410 --> 01:18:27.430
And how they come out of that on the other end, I mean, Zuckerberg has said that he's concerned about someone like Elizabeth Warren possibly wanting to break up Facebook.
488
01:18:27.890 --> 01:18:52.050
Um, you have to look at the ways in which they are mobilizing as though a military mobilizes itself against that type of fate to make it nearly impossible for it to be broken up because there, as Zuckerberg rightly says, there is an existential threat against its platform and its ability to, let's say, fight Google as an advertising platform if it gets decentralized and broken up because of the way in which Google is a hardware, uh, sort of a hybrid company.
489
01:18:52.070 --> 01:19:06.590
They're both hardware and they're software, and the ways in which they are able to pull data from all sorts of contexts to then build this advertising profile of you is so profound that Facebook is sort of a check against Google in a sense that I think a lot of people don't fully, you know, think about or understand.
490
01:19:06.610 --> 01:19:26.470
And at the same time, we haven't thought clearly about how we want to perhaps regulate these companies to be able to give us more of a sense for what they know about us, what they're doing to track us, uh, what they're doing to give us a sense of, of sovereignty and an understanding of the ways in which they're using this information to try to manipulate our commercial activities.
491
01:19:27.070 --> 01:19:29.100
Um, I think there's a lot of,
492
01:19:30.310 --> 01:19:46.150
in a way sort of, a-again, whether it's anxiety or provocation around these conversations that we need to get to a place where we can step back and take a more objective look at them and say, "Well, it's, it's completely normal for a digital company to wanna manipulate people into engaging in commercial activity like buying things."
493
01:19:46.230 --> 01:19:52.746
Um, however- It's, it's creepy sometimes when w- we are tracked in ways that we don't expect.
494
01:19:53.126 --> 01:20:04.516
You know, for example, if you're tracked in the bathroom, you know, when you're watching your Instagram stories or whatever, um, and then, you know, you're advertised like toilet paper or something, that's a space that we typically think of as being, you know, private from prying eyes.
495
01:20:04.586 --> 01:20:10.986
We literally like close the door, and it's one of the few places where you can go anywhere where you have some moment of, of privacy all to yourself.
496
01:20:11.426 --> 01:20:20.095
And if we start to invade those spaces with these digital technologies or with Alexa and things like that, um, we should be thinking differently about what we're demanding of these companies if they behave differently.
497
01:20:20.536 --> 01:20:32.906
I think there is a desire or willingness to some degree within these companies to actually adapt and change based on, um, you know, critique and on, you know, concerns that people raise because these companies don't want their products to not be used.
498
01:20:33.626 --> 01:20:42.286
At the same time, they have to make their business work. Um, and so if we can have a more nuanced conversation that gets into like the details, um, then I think that would be productive.
499
01:20:42.326 --> 01:20:46.206
Like, for example, um, uh, Howie, what's his name?
500
01:20:46.766 --> 01:21:00.176
Uh, Senator Howie, um, from the South, I don't know where he's from exactly, has this, uh, proposal which, you know, seems half written by the folks from, um, the Humane Tech Society or whatever that group is called,
501
01:21:01.356 --> 01:21:09.676
um, you know, with Azarask and Tristan Harris. And one of the things that he suggests that should be banned is infinite scroll and autoplay videos on YouTube.
502
01:21:10.406 --> 01:21:18.916
Now, like you can look at that and be like, "Oh, like that's, that's a, you know, clever solution to this problem." However, it's a solution that only makes sense in 2019.
503
01:21:19.566 --> 01:21:27.045
In 2020 and beyond, we're gonna be living in augmented reality. Like infinite scroll becomes somewhat obsolete for a whole swath of the population.
504
01:21:27.576 --> 01:21:38.666
So instead, we have to have more principled ways of, of thinking about these things and the way that they influence us and integrate in our lives that is more forward-looking and anticipates how this interaction should be.
505
01:21:38.746 --> 01:21:40.366
What type of relationship do we want with our tech?
506
01:21:40.786 --> 01:21:49.486
So when I think about 2020, I think we're finally gonna have some really tough conversations probably, you know, based on how maybe the election goes and the way in which Trump...
507
01:21:49.506 --> 01:21:59.746
You know, I was thinking about this today. You know, like it, it-- people are outraged about Trump, you know, utilizing a foreign government to attempt to win the 2020 election.
508
01:22:00.406 --> 01:22:17.786
And that feels somewhat naive because like if you think about The Apprentice, which of course was like Trump's TV show, the whole point of The Apprentice was to set up conflict and then to have a winner rise out of, uh, this group of people who are all sort of fawning to become part of the royal court.
509
01:22:18.446 --> 01:22:28.786
Well, it's totally natural and normal for someone like Trump, who actually doesn't care that much about the presidency, to only want to stay in power and to use all of the power at his disposal to do that.
510
01:22:28.826 --> 01:22:36.616
So it's like, you know, normal. It's sort of like, you know, you can't take the fox out of a fox. So given that we find ourselves like in that situation,
511
01:22:37.546 --> 01:22:51.376
and there's likely going to be manipulation in the 2020 election, what is it that we're doing to, you know, learn and to prepare and to think differently about how these structural institutions that have been with us for a long time adapt to this modern environment?
512
01:22:51.646 --> 01:22:58.446
And how should people in those roles of power be cast as benevolent dictators as opposed to dictators for life?
513
01:22:59.366 --> 01:23:05.686
And so that requires a very different way of looking at these structures and how they operate in the era of the internet, um, and the digital economy.
514
01:23:06.346 --> 01:23:23.166
And I, and on that last kind of, kind of nice ending to the show, uh, one quick, quick question around all of that area is kind of do you-- would you go out on a limb and say any interesting thing you think is a bit of a long shot, but you would put a little bit of money on as something that might happen that people will be shocked by?
515
01:23:23.266 --> 01:23:35.006
Or is, yeah, I would say there's a good chance that X would happen or Y would happen? Or is there any big winner or big loser next year that you can think, you know, they're the ones to watch for, for 2020?
516
01:23:35.056 --> 01:23:47.665
[laughs] Uh, I think the dark horse is Amazon. Um, you know, and they are going to continue to execute, and they are going to continue to bring Alexa into more and more places.
517
01:23:47.706 --> 01:23:55.226
And we're gonna wake up one day and, you know, the Google Assistant is gonna be hard to find. You know, the Facebook Assistant basically doesn't exist.
518
01:23:55.686 --> 01:24:03.486
You know, Siri is, is kind of dumb and requires you to do a lot of work because of, uh, Apple's stance with regards to privacy. Like they are not collecting the data.
519
01:24:03.526 --> 01:24:08.346
They're not training on, uh, enough information, whereas these other companies are.
520
01:24:08.556 --> 01:24:15.646
And so on the one hand, it's sort of like saying, "Well, we are choosing," and, and I, you know, maybe this is a principled approach, and I, I hope it is. I hope it's genuine.
521
01:24:16.106 --> 01:24:24.466
You know, we are, you know, running this, this race, you know, in a potato sack because privacy is too important for us to make an assistant that actually is effective.
522
01:24:24.926 --> 01:24:37.326
But, you know, Amazon and Google are, are, are racing to win. And so we are going to have a different relationship with Amazon going forward, and, and that actually I think is, um,
523
01:24:38.266 --> 01:24:45.486
the one that is the most kind of like, ugh, like I don't know where this is going to go, and I don't know if I fully trust Bezos and like what he wants for the world.
524
01:24:45.566 --> 01:24:54.866
And that is the sort of locus of power, um, you know, to rival like the Zuckerbergian Facebook empire, um, that I'm, I'm most concerned about.
525
01:24:54.986 --> 01:25:05.026
So I think, you know, when we wake up in November of 2020, we're gonna look around and be like, "Wow, how did Amazon suddenly become so ingrained in my everyday life? It's in my car. It's in my hotel.
526
01:25:05.066 --> 01:25:15.766
It's in my airplane. It's in my airport. Everywhere I go, I'm talking to Alexa. How did that happen?" Um, and that might be the, the surprise, uh, that, that none of us necessarily, um, were prepared for.
527
01:25:16.186 --> 01:25:23.746
Well, I think that's a pretty good, uh, way to wrap up the show. I don't know of anyone else's thoughts on that one. But, um, Chris, it's been fascinating chatting to you.
528
01:25:23.926 --> 01:25:29.926
Um, I'm sure that we'll have you back in season two and hopefully season three, four, five and six as well. Amazing.
529
01:25:29.996 --> 01:25:39.434
Um, but Chris, tell us a little bit about where we can, um, people can find you online, things that you're up to that you want us to-- people to see. This is your PR promo moment. Go for it. Sure. Yeah.
530
01:25:39.444 --> 01:25:42.114
So, um, you can find my website at chrismessina.me.
531
01:25:42.694 --> 01:25:49.734
Um, it's also my name, um, on Twitter, chrismessina, and then I'm chris on Instagram if you wanna check out some of my stories and some of my travels and things like that.
532
01:25:50.354 --> 01:25:53.534
Um, those are the best places to get in touch with me. Oh, of course, I'm also on Product Hunt.
533
01:25:54.054 --> 01:26:00.054
Um, I'm, I'm a pretty avid user there, um, 'cause it's a way of, like, surfing the future and, you know, seeing what people are thinking about what's happening and interesting.
534
01:26:00.154 --> 01:26:03.034
Um, and Matt, I also wanna congratulate you on your first season of this.
535
01:26:03.114 --> 01:26:09.754
You know, you and I had this conversation about this podcast that you were gonna get started when we were in Australia, and here it is, um, your, your sort of final episode.
536
01:26:09.834 --> 01:26:15.534
So I'm really proud of you for, like, making this happen, and I'm excited about, like, the, the next season and, and beyond. Oh, that's really nice to hear.
537
01:26:15.714 --> 01:26:22.634
We're, we're surprised and excited by the fact that people have even listened to it. We, we... You know, if we got- [laughs]... 100 listeners, I would've been cheering anyway.
538
01:26:22.754 --> 01:26:28.444
So it's, uh, it's done better than we ever thought. But thank you so much for- Amazing... for coming on. Okay. Time now for quick hits.
539
01:26:28.754 --> 01:26:40.554
Here's Matt with a bunch of tests and updates from social media companies that are quick, quite quiet, but hopefully not quixotic. Jesus Christ. Okay. [laughs] Let's go for this. Right. So dark mode for Instagram.
540
01:26:40.594 --> 01:26:48.014
We mentioned this, I think, in previous, um, episodes of the podcast. Um, but dark mode now it seems to be rolling out for both, uh, Android and iOS.
541
01:26:48.774 --> 01:26:57.894
Uh, so you can have a little look in your settings, and you'll find that if you have dark mode on natively on iOS, at least, it will, um, adopt the dark mode within Instagram as well.
542
01:26:57.954 --> 01:27:05.394
So it works in conjunction with the, the native dark mode on your, uh, device, which is good. Uh, Instagram Group Stories.
543
01:27:05.534 --> 01:27:15.514
So Group Stories was tried out, um, obviously on Facebook, um, Facebook Stories, but it didn't really work out. But now it seems that they are also testing a Group Stories feature on Instagram.
544
01:27:15.614 --> 01:27:23.294
Um, that one was courtesy of Jane Wong, and th- there's a couple here actually from Jane, so there's some good finds this week. Instagram QR codes is another one.
545
01:27:23.334 --> 01:27:35.074
So Instagram already has the name tag feature which acts in, in a way like a QR code which you can scan, and it helps you find, uh, uh, an account or, um, follow an account that you want to follow, and you can create your own, uh, name tag.
546
01:27:35.114 --> 01:27:44.414
But they're also playing around with QR codes as well. So it could be something around the shopping, um, kind of area that they're playing f- with it for or an extra variation on name tags. Who knows?
547
01:27:44.794 --> 01:27:48.934
So that's, uh, something that's been played around with. Twitter streaming tweets settings.
548
01:27:49.034 --> 01:28:01.234
So, um, was playing with the, um, latest version of Twitter and had a little poke around in its code, and there's, uh, an option when you choose to view tweets as latest tweets in chronological order that enables you to switch on a toggle for streaming tweets.
549
01:28:01.294 --> 01:28:12.514
So it's a bit like the days gone by when Twitter first came out, and also is familiar to those who use TweetDeck, where rather than you having to pull to refresh like, um, like we used to, uh, it just continue updates at the top.
550
01:28:12.574 --> 01:28:21.754
So it's like a f- a running stream of, of tweets. So more cosmetic than I can think of a, a real utility for it on, on the app. But, uh, some people will be pleased that that's coming, I'm sure.
551
01:28:22.754 --> 01:28:24.674
Scheduling of tweets on desktop.
552
01:28:24.774 --> 01:28:34.584
So, you know, we can already schedule tweets via various publishing tools, and you can use some of the, um, ad, um, and studio product features from Twitter to do this as well as, uh, TweetDeck.
553
01:28:34.974 --> 01:28:40.374
But now on desktop Twitter, twitter.com, they are playing around with an option to schedule tweets there as well.
554
01:28:40.514 --> 01:28:51.014
So probably more excitement for social media managers, but I would imagine most won't find it that useful because, uh, probably they'll be using a publishing tool that does all the scheduling for them. But there we go.
555
01:28:51.094 --> 01:28:56.154
It's something they're playing around with at the moment. Also Twitter advanced search by engagement metrics.
556
01:28:56.274 --> 01:29:15.414
So if you're one of those people that loves digging into, um, the native metrics on Twitter, um, and also have been quite experienced with using all the search operators, this might not be as exciting 'cause you can always search for tweets on, uh, the number of likes or retweets it's got, um, by using the correct search parameters, um, that you have to sort of, uh, manually type in.
557
01:29:15.784 --> 01:29:28.134
But now there seems to be actual, s- um, options within Twitter's advanced search being tested to search for tweets with a threshold of more than 200 likes or less than 100, uh, retweets or whatever else alo- along those lines.
558
01:29:28.194 --> 01:29:35.254
So that might be a, a useful one for those digging into the, uh, success of their posts. Uh, Twitter DM reactions.
559
01:29:35.414 --> 01:29:46.474
So it's something that we've seen before in Instagram, um, direct messages as well, where if you have a message from someone, you can tap the, the, the message within that conversation, and it, uh, likes that, uh, particular message comment.
560
01:29:46.914 --> 01:29:54.554
Uh, Twitter's DM, ums, are also now seemingly testing such an option as well, so that might, um, appear in your DM inbox soon.
561
01:29:55.133 --> 01:30:01.914
And finally, uh, only recently, Instagram Create Mode, which was spotted a little while back, but now it's actually rolling out to most users.
562
01:30:02.054 --> 01:30:09.934
So there is, uh, an option within the stories, uh, creation, uh, composing area where you can slide across and pick, uh, Create Mode.
563
01:30:09.954 --> 01:30:16.994
And Create Mode gives you a much quicker and direct access to some of the common things that we like doing with stories, so like adding a GIF to your story.
564
01:30:17.044 --> 01:30:23.414
You could make a GIF actually as a background to your story, which is a bit more funky than it's been before rather than just sticking it on as a sticker.
565
01:30:24.034 --> 01:30:44.074
Um, and there's also a, a new templates, um, option which, uh, gives you a variety of different, as it says, templates to kind of add into your story, um, that give a nice frame around something or, or, uh, some sort of, uh, whiteboard, blackboard kind of example template they've got there, which you could kind of draw on top of or get your followers who, uh, follow your stories to draw onto as well.
566
01:30:44.514 --> 01:30:47.614
And there's a few other bits and pieces in there, which is on the Create Mode.
567
01:30:47.714 --> 01:30:57.554
So, uh, the-- I think some of the logos have actually changed as well there for the, for the, uh, creation tools within stories at the same time. So a bunch of updates there. Thank you to Jane Wong for some of those.
568
01:30:57.754 --> 01:31:02.294
Um, and that is quick hits for the season finale. Yeah. Instagram Create Mode is really useful for me.
569
01:31:02.394 --> 01:31:09.254
I do a thing, uh, often, uh, not every day, but I do a, a thing called Earworm of the Day where I'll share a song that I've got stuck in my head.
570
01:31:09.564 --> 01:31:19.094
And, uh, I always to, to have a background for it, I always have to use something, you know, take a random picture of a bit of wallpaper or the carpet or something really close up, so it's just something random to fill the background.
571
01:31:19.464 --> 01:31:28.914
And, uh, it sometimes it works really well. I, I had my bathroom carpet in one the other day, but, uh, uh, having a few more options around that is good. And Martin, now let's wrap up this, uh, last episode.
572
01:31:28.994 --> 01:31:38.554
What have, what have we got to say? Well, yes. That is indeed it for this season. But fear not, as we said earlier, we are working on returning to your ears very, very soon. Uh, very, very soon indeed.
573
01:31:38.994 --> 01:31:44.134
Uh, all being well, we may be back in the next few weeks. We don't want to leave it too long. Absolutely not. Yes.
574
01:31:44.234 --> 01:31:50.914
And make sure you hit subscribe in your podcast app of choice so you're notified as soon as the next episode is available.
575
01:31:51.174 --> 01:31:56.274
We've already got a long list of guests that we want to have on the show, and that includes some very big names.
576
01:31:56.374 --> 01:32:06.614
Uh, that's people at Facebook and Twitter and Instagram and, and all sorts of other companies, Amazon, and everyone in between. So we're really looking forward to, uh, trying to get ourselves back as quickly as possible.
577
01:32:06.894 --> 01:32:18.294
Yeah. Let's see who we can get. Uh, Geek Out! with Matt Navarra is a Big Revolution production. Find out more at bigrevolution.net. You can find me on Twitter as martinsfp. And I'm @mattnavarra on Twitter.
578
01:32:18.414 --> 01:32:26.454
So don't forget to tell all your friends about the podcast, and make sure they listen to this final episode. And as we said earlier, uh, you know, make sure you leave us a nice voice message.
579
01:32:26.494 --> 01:32:33.714
We chose not to play one of the messages we had, which was a lovely singing song, but we will eventually play a collection of them on, uh, the show.
580
01:32:33.834 --> 01:32:44.974
So visit anchor.fm/geekoutmattnavarra, and you'll find an option to record a message, and it'd be great to hear your feedback. And don't forget to join the Facebook group. It's, uh, Social Media Geek Out on Facebook.
581
01:32:45.014 --> 01:32:57.934
That's, uh, facebook.com/groups/socialgeekout. And I think that is about it, isn't it, Martin? Absolutely. We'll see you soon. So goodbye for now, geeks.
582
01:33:01.833 --> 01:33:09.074
[outro music]