WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:15.760
It's time to Geek Out. [upbeat music] Hello, and welcome to Geek Out with Matt Navarra, with me, Matt Navarra. And me, Martin SFP Bryant.
2
00:00:16.140 --> 00:00:28.740
Now, what happens when you cross a professional news report about a stuck ship on the Suez Canal with a sea shanty? The answer was one of BBC journalist Sophia Smith Galer's biggest hits on TikTok. Yes.
3
00:00:28.840 --> 00:00:38.820
Sophia has made a name for herself using TikTok to explain both news stories and how journalism itself works, and she joined us live on Twitter Spaces to talk about her work and her career.
4
00:00:38.830 --> 00:00:46.400
And there's far more to her than just a few viral hits. So we chatted about everything from dealing with negativity online to her social media toolkit.
5
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:58.059
This is a really fun conversation if you're interested in how news works on social media and how a new generation of journalists are forging careers that put their own identity front and center.
6
00:00:58.100 --> 00:01:08.940
Sophia has announced that she's leaving the BBC soon for pastures new, so this was a great time to chat to her. Here's what happened when we spoke to Sophia Smith Galer. Hi. Hey, both. How are you doing, Matt and Martin?
7
00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:16.580
I'm good. I'm, I'm reading on the news that your life is changing. We're gonna come onto all of that in a minute because you've got some, all sorts of things going on in your world.
8
00:01:16.660 --> 00:01:24.620
But, um, but yeah, what's, uh, what's the week been like for you to date? Have you started off with a, a usual working week, or have you had a day off, or? No, it's been a usual working week.
9
00:01:24.720 --> 00:01:29.280
The last fortnight I've been on and off with book edits, which has been very exciting. Um- Ooh...
10
00:01:29.360 --> 00:01:43.700
but no, I am, I'm back working this week, um, on my next couple of, uh, BBC Radio docs, which, um, are gonna be my last, uh, for now as- Oh. Oh... you know. Well, we- Little BBC journo. Yeah...
11
00:01:43.730 --> 00:01:50.520
w- we're gonna dig into all of that stuff, but th- maybe the first thing that would be worth starting off with is I've got a little bit of a background on, on what you've done up until now.
12
00:01:50.620 --> 00:01:59.380
You can correct me and us if we're wrong on any of these. You, you did a master's, is that right, in broadcast journalism in London. Is that right? Yes, I did. Yes. And you started doing work for the BBC.
13
00:01:59.440 --> 00:02:07.600
Was that kind of your first job out of that kind of studies, or w- did you do other things before then? It was my first proper job, as it were.
14
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:22.609
But, um, before I'd left that master's, I had done a couple of cool other things. I'd worked on a, a BBC One documentary. Um, I'd spent some time with NBC's London bureau as well. Uh, that was all during the master's.
15
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:33.260
But yeah, my first proper job was social media producer at bbc.com. And what does that involve then? When, 'cause the j- title social media producer could n- could be construed as many things.
16
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:43.180
Is that basically a journalist, but it's geared towards content that goes on social, or is it a specific aspect of the production of news for social? What, how, uh, you know, tell us a bit about that. Yeah.
17
00:02:43.220 --> 00:02:54.700
So it was specifically for... So bbc.com straddles the US and UK, and I was working for the two feature sites that are in the UK- Mm... which are BBC Culture and BBC Future.
18
00:02:55.480 --> 00:03:03.000
And the job before me, uh, it was, uh, two different people held those roles, and I was the first to do both of them, uh, in my role together.
19
00:03:03.470 --> 00:03:18.020
And it meant that the work was really varied because I had to make, um, social media content on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram for both of those verticals. So nice m- you know, Future covers tech, science,
20
00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:28.740
lots of random things like psychology, the world of tomorrow. And Culture, pretty self-explanatory. It would be music, arts, literature. So it was really varied.
21
00:03:29.300 --> 00:03:38.710
And I would, a lot of my job would be figuring out ways to promote text, these text features on social media. Yeah.
22
00:03:38.780 --> 00:03:52.079
Um, it would be working with video producers to maybe make some videos out of text features we anticipated would do well, uh, as, as social video. Um, and then like you say, I did a lot more than that.
23
00:03:52.160 --> 00:04:00.720
I, I wrote features myself. I made videos myself. Um, it was a bit of a mix, yeah. Okay. And so then you moved on and worked for the World Service.
24
00:04:00.760 --> 00:04:08.840
And, am I, am I right in saying also that for that, your job title changed again, and you was more of a visual journalist. Is that what they call it at the BBC? Yes, a visual journalist.
25
00:04:09.060 --> 00:04:18.740
Um, and it is depend- like, it does change what that means. So some people who are visual journalists at the BBC actually deal with visualizing data. Yeah. That was not my job.
26
00:04:18.899 --> 00:04:32.080
Uh, really I was just more of a- [laughs]... of a video journalist. So it was, it's my job to make sure that Heart N Soul, the religion documentary strand of the BBC World Service, has a digital presence. Um- Yeah...
27
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:40.920
so sometimes that means making a video for them. Sometimes that, um, it might not be making a video, but it would be sort of creating Instagram content for it.
28
00:04:41.320 --> 00:04:53.380
Just finding a way, or even if it's just an interesting way to tweet it out, just finding a way for it to reach digital audiences because obviously it's already reaching radio audiences. Yeah, yeah.
29
00:04:53.420 --> 00:04:57.740
And then you, so you worked quite heavily on the, the sort of faith content for the BBC, didn't you?
30
00:04:57.770 --> 00:05:05.969
And sort of some of the user-generated stuff, and particularly around, like, an, uh, the Instagram account for BBC World. Was it for BBC World that you were doing that for? Was that, or was it one of the sub brands?
31
00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:15.780
BBC... Yeah, BBC World Service- Right... uh, is who it was for. Um- Yeah... and they, I pitched that Instagram account in my job interview. Right. So it didn't exist before I came.
32
00:05:16.680 --> 00:05:25.460
And how did you approach that 'cause the topic of religion is always [laughs] a contentious one? Mm. I know I put some of the content that talks about things to do with politics or religion in my Facebook group.
33
00:05:25.520 --> 00:05:32.980
I'm always a bit like, "Oh, if, unless this is a really important story, it's gonna cause a lot of friction and a lot of tension. There's a lot of polarization."
34
00:05:33.380 --> 00:05:41.300
So that must have been quite a, a challenging role I would imagine, or did you find it easier than you imagined, like, dealing with the topic of faith, uh, on social?
35
00:05:42.100 --> 00:05:51.700
You are right that especially in comment sections it can drive some vitriol. Mm. But I think it's also because of the kind of stories that I do.
36
00:05:51.760 --> 00:06:03.060
They're not necessarily on the diary kind of news stories, that, that it's slower journalism. It's more featurey, documentary. Um, and by nature of Heart N Soul being a doc program, um, I think-
37
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:14.060
We do sometimes avoid that, like, really nasty side of the internet. Um- Yeah... but with Instagram, my strategy was use,
38
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:29.600
uh, BBC World Service and other BBC outlets' content that was around religion, spirituality, and complement that with content that was simply, it only ever went out on our Instagram account.
39
00:06:29.660 --> 00:06:38.400
So sometimes that would be Instagram bespoke. Films I'd make or posts I'd do, or I remember in the very beginning I would do seasons.
40
00:06:38.430 --> 00:06:43.660
So each month we'd focus on something different, be it sacred music, be it faith and fashion.
41
00:06:44.300 --> 00:06:53.780
Um, and I would try and, and involve people who were influencers in the religious space to get involved with the Instagram account. Yeah. Um, and as a way to grow it early on.
42
00:06:54.420 --> 00:07:01.860
And was BBC pretty good with that in terms of kind of giving you some level of autonomy, in terms of letting you put your own kind of thoughts into that?
43
00:07:01.940 --> 00:07:11.940
Or, or is it, is it quite bureaucratic and, and it's quite difficult in that, in that sort of environment with BBC compared to maybe a Sky News or another sort of more sort of profit-driven, uh, organization?
44
00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:22.800
How, how's that been? I, um, I was given a lot of freedom with that Instagram account, and I really enjoyed it, and it wouldn't have grown at, at the rate that it did if I didn't have that freedom.
45
00:07:22.880 --> 00:07:30.710
Uh, so I had a really great time running it. Oh. Well, I w- I think what we, I guess we should ch- talk a little bit about is TikTok, because I guess- [clears throat]...
46
00:07:30.710 --> 00:07:42.740
most people are familiar with a lot of the stuff that you've done in, in relation to TikTok, whether it's because you've talked about the, um, the platform or you've done something on the platform yourself and you've, you know, been in the news in relation to TikTok.
47
00:07:43.020 --> 00:07:58.320
So I guess one of the questions I wanted to ask you about is kind of, um, how much of your r- role now revolves around, like, the, the, that specific platform, or do you treat it more as social platforms more broadly and it just happens to be that TikTok for you is one that you favor and find it most interesting, you know?
48
00:07:58.360 --> 00:08:11.280
Where does it sit amongst, uh, the mix of things? It's really difficult to answer that really because especially as I'm in this weird life limbo at the moment- Yeah... and it's all probably about to change slightly.
49
00:08:11.740 --> 00:08:11.859
Yeah.
50
00:08:11.980 --> 00:08:30.820
Um, but I mean, up until now it's been this bizarre platform that has provided me with so much, so many ideas, uh, such a big audience that I never thought I would really be able to access, certainly not at this stage in my career, uh, this early on.
51
00:08:30.900 --> 00:08:44.880
Uh, however, it is the one app that I use day to day, which the BBC is not on, uh, BBC editorial news content that is. So- Why is that? Oh, I don't know. That's sort of- [laughs]... a pay grade, Matt. I wouldn't know.
52
00:08:44.980 --> 00:08:55.570
[laughs] Fair enough. Fair enough. Martin. Yeah. So, so how did you break through on TikTok? Was there one video that kind of clicked with the audience and you thought, "Ooh, I'm onto something here"?
53
00:08:57.560 --> 00:09:07.240
The first video I made was all because I had heard about TikTok. I'd been on there for a few days, weeks. Thought, "Oh yeah, this is fun."
54
00:09:07.700 --> 00:09:14.929
And at the time it was so nascent, um, I was the only person my age who I knew had even gone on it out of curiosity.
55
00:09:15.560 --> 00:09:24.440
Um, and I, you know, as a video journalist, I just thought, "Hmm, I should know what this is about in- just in case the BBC comes on it." [laughs] "I should know how it works.
56
00:09:24.940 --> 00:09:28.960
I don't wanna, uh, I don't suddenly have to use it for work and look like an idiot."
57
00:09:29.020 --> 00:09:41.060
So I started making, um, a video which was based on a trend that I'd seen, uh, and that's because I'd spent time on TikTok and I saw a number of people doing the same audio meme. So I thought, "Oh, okay. I'll do it."
58
00:09:41.400 --> 00:09:53.160
I did it and it blew up and it gave me, I think I got 4,000 followers just from that one video over a s- short space of days, and I just kept making them.
59
00:09:53.250 --> 00:10:03.440
Anyone who's ever gone viral before knows that the hit of virality is infectious. Mm-hmm. So you get it and then you think, "God, I wanna do it again. I want that to happen again."
60
00:10:04.140 --> 00:10:16.440
Um, and so when you have a video tank you think, "Oh, no." You know? [laughs] You get really, uh, upset and then, then you have a video do really well, uh, it feels deeply gratifying and validating.
61
00:10:16.640 --> 00:10:27.680
So that's basically what kept me on there. And then the longer time I spent on there, the more I realized that, "Oh, this could be useful. This could be a useful journalistic tool for me.
62
00:10:27.740 --> 00:10:38.920
It's not just something to have fun on." [laughs] And obviously over the past couple of years, we have really seen it become an app that provides us with so many different types of content.
63
00:10:39.160 --> 00:10:51.600
Increasingly, lots of it is very creative, very engaging, very informative. Um, it's not simply a place where we joke around or we share, um, sort of relatable content.
64
00:10:51.660 --> 00:11:01.120
It's also very much become an information space, an information sharing space. Is the, is the instance of going viral on TikTok, do you think it's different?
65
00:11:01.180 --> 00:11:17.100
There's something about it that's s- somewhat unique compared to going viral with a tweet on, on Twitter and, and y- and second part to that question, do you think that TikTok is somewhat unique amongst the social platforms, particularly in your world of, of social in, in journalism?
66
00:11:17.520 --> 00:11:26.440
Is there something special about it or is it just another social platform? I can... This is completely based on my personal experience, so other people may have found something different.
67
00:11:26.460 --> 00:11:37.950
But I have found that I, in terms of reaching an audience that is not yet connected to me, i.e. they may not already follow me, they may not even follow any of my acquaintances.
68
00:11:38.540 --> 00:11:47.980
For me to reach them rapidly, I know that, oh, if I make a good enough TikTok, I'll reach them, and I'll reach them within a day, two days. Mm.
69
00:11:48.120 --> 00:11:56.200
Um, I, I know that a tweet or Instagram post wouldn't necessarily deliver me, um,
70
00:11:57.120 --> 00:12:10.216
what I'd want, which would be a lot of people getting in touch with me, um, or even a lot of people- Sim- simply sharing something that could then lead me onto the next tip and the next tip after that. Mm.
71
00:12:10.416 --> 00:12:23.736
Um, so, so it's that speed that i- is very efficient for me. Mm. Um, that being said, that this, that only comes with having developed a profile on there, which is not efficient. [laughs] It's a lot of- Mm...
72
00:12:23.936 --> 00:12:31.456
it's a lot of work every day. Um- Got it... and, or every week. Yeah. So it's tricky. And, and what, what's- Yeah... and what's cut through the most for you?
73
00:12:31.496 --> 00:12:38.896
Then what's, what's the video that you think has cut through the most for you and been most successful in terms of it- its impact, sup- both on TikTok and beyond?
74
00:12:38.976 --> 00:12:47.776
'Cause these things reach out and, you know, I've seen your stuff far more on Twitter, I suppose, than I have on TikTok, so, um, because people have shared it and go, "Hey, check out this." Yeah.
75
00:12:47.816 --> 00:12:55.176
And I deliberately don't share most of my TikToks on Twitter- Mm... 'cause that's how I work out who's actually following me on TikTok or not.
76
00:12:55.216 --> 00:13:04.256
[laughs] Um, and I even, even on Instagram, I don't of- I often don't share a lot of my TikTok content either. Um,
77
00:13:05.476 --> 00:13:18.116
there are two ways that I measure impact with TikTok, and again, it's dependent on, on various things that I like to do, and I appreciate the same video doesn't necessarily achieve all these different things that I like to do.
78
00:13:18.176 --> 00:13:28.636
So you could make a video that gets you loads of new followers, but it may not necessarily, um, help me with a story that I'm currently working on, for example. Mm. However, it's all useful.
79
00:13:28.956 --> 00:13:36.736
It's all beneficial to, to me growing my audience and that audience being there when I do have a new story or when I do need new information.
80
00:13:37.416 --> 00:13:51.186
Um, so if we take an example that put me on people's radar, like the Suez Canal Sea Shanties, a really brilliant example of that. Um, it put me on such a big, um, you know, megaphone- [laughs]...
81
00:13:51.196 --> 00:14:01.236
that it got me on the, on the front page of Egypt's, uh, newspap- most read newspaper. It got me on Greg James' [laughs] One Breakfast Show. I remember this. Yeah.
82
00:14:01.296 --> 00:14:11.175
Like, if you'd said to me, "Sofia, figure out a way for you to get your journalism on, um, the front page of an Egyptian newspaper and Greg James' show," I'd have been like, "Uh, gosh, what am I gonna have to do to do that?"
83
00:14:11.696 --> 00:14:24.556
Well, it was a Suez Canal Sea Shanty. Um, but then there are other videos that I've made that ha- have had maybe 30,000 views, 40,000 views. Natively, there is no way I'd get that amount of views with a Twitter video.
84
00:14:25.216 --> 00:14:37.116
Um, even though I have, you know, a not completely tiny Twitter following, but if I, if I just put a video out there, it would get maybe 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 views if I'm lucky, if it didn't go viral.
85
00:14:37.776 --> 00:14:45.996
Um, on TikTok, 30,000 views, and if it's about quite a niche topic where I'm inviting people to say, "Hey, I'm working on this.
86
00:14:46.076 --> 00:15:00.416
I'd love to talk to people who have a relevant experience they'd be happy sharing," that can deliver me so many DMs even though it only has 30,000 views. Um, and in that respect, that's very useful to me.
87
00:15:00.456 --> 00:15:07.636
So it really differentiates for me, um, what a useful or, or good TikTok can be.
88
00:15:08.496 --> 00:15:24.856
So in terms of, like, approaching news then and as a journalist that predominantly uses or likes to use social platforms, is the process for those of s- who are uninitiated with the, the, the world of creating a news story for the BBC or any of these news publishers, is there a quite different approach to it?
89
00:15:24.936 --> 00:15:38.916
Um, what, the i- coming up with the idea, developing the idea, producing it for, for, for use on whatever platform, if you know from the outset that this is, you know, one that you can see or aiming it to be a successful piece that is geared towards, say, TikTok.
90
00:15:39.366 --> 00:15:47.276
I- is there a difference in the approach? And if so, could you s- help us understand how, you know, how you approach it differently? What things do you consider, um, when you're, when you're go through the process?
91
00:15:48.276 --> 00:15:54.436
That's a really good question. Um, there are different things that you could do.
92
00:15:54.686 --> 00:16:07.776
If you've noticed that there's a particular topic that loads of people on TikTok seem really invested in and are talking about, it, it, that it seems smart to think, oh, well, they're talking about it in this way.
93
00:16:07.816 --> 00:16:19.226
However, they haven't covered this part of the conversation. Um, and perhaps they haven't covered this part of the conversation because they haven't been able to directly speak to an expert, for example. Mm.
94
00:16:19.256 --> 00:16:29.536
So your additional value that you can provide, for example, as a public service broadcaster, would be, right, let's, let's bring something into this conversation that they're not already talking about.
95
00:16:29.716 --> 00:16:37.976
But, um, they are hyper-engaged, and they'll appreciate it. It, it will give them some new information and that they're more likely to engage and share it.
96
00:16:38.716 --> 00:16:48.296
Um, one example is I made a video about forced marriage and that, that used a TikTok, uh, creator who had gone viral on the platform.
97
00:16:49.036 --> 00:16:58.236
Um, and he still isn't a massive creator on there or anything, but there will be people who remember his video because it was so moving. Mm.
98
00:16:58.396 --> 00:17:06.656
Um, so including him as, as the author of the film, again, um, drove some engagement. Um,
99
00:17:08.356 --> 00:17:17.396
really I would suggest, 'cause most people won't necessarily be able to spend the time to look on TikTok for case studies and contributors, um,
100
00:17:19.336 --> 00:17:27.786
it is smart to spend time on there and at least see simply what people are talking about. And then very quickly you'll start to see, ah, they're really interested in this.
101
00:17:28.436 --> 00:17:36.096
And if you're thinking, oh, well, I wanna do a report on this, but no one's talking about it on there, chances are it's because younger audiences aren't that interested in it.
102
00:17:36.736 --> 00:17:41.836
Um, or maybe it's simply never been served to them in a way that's actually relevant to their lives.
103
00:17:42.696 --> 00:17:49.376
'Cause one of the challenges that the news publishers face at the moment, or you hear a lot talked about, is, is reaching younger audiences.
104
00:17:49.416 --> 00:18:05.216
And you look at the Reuters digital news reports and you see, um, lots of coverage, uh, in, in the world of journalism about how do you reach that, you know, these younger audiences who are heavy, heavy or heavier users of social platforms who are disenfranchised, disengaged in, in news media.
105
00:18:05.616 --> 00:18:09.676
Uh, and we're gonna talk about some of the possible reasons for that later on. I've got a couple of questions I wanted to ask you.
106
00:18:09.756 --> 00:18:16.396
But, you know, um, what, you know, what sort of things do tend to work well s- on, on platforms?
107
00:18:16.436 --> 00:18:22.996
Is, is it easier saying, well, if it's TikTok, then stories that are about A, B, C, D, they're, they're gonna reach people, younger audiences there really easily.
108
00:18:23.036 --> 00:18:32.156
But topics like this isn't, they're not gonna work so much. Is it, is it as clear cut as that? Or is it more about just the style and it doesn't matter about what the story's about, it's the way that you deliver it?
109
00:18:32.876 --> 00:18:39.336
I was gonna say, I don't think it's to do with topics, to be honest. Mm-hmm. I think it's far more style-wise.
110
00:18:39.516 --> 00:19:03.676
Um, I, I do genuinely believe there is something in every topic to make it interesting to younger audiences, and if not, you know, all younger audiences, at least a niche within younger audiences who, who are only gonna encounter that cont- content on their social media platform because they're not interested in consuming your n- you know, they don't go to your website, they don't buy your paper, th- they don't listen to your radio station.
111
00:19:03.716 --> 00:19:10.805
Like, they're not gonna find it that way. So the only way it's gonna get to them is on a social media platform. Um, style-wise,
112
00:19:11.796 --> 00:19:23.016
we do know that people, uh, uh, from that digital news report, we know that Twitter is realistically the only app that people go to for mainstream news content. Mm.
113
00:19:23.096 --> 00:19:28.256
For other platforms, for, for YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, they go for personalities.
114
00:19:28.936 --> 00:19:43.036
Um, and if you look at a number of the, I'd, I'd say sort of a couple of on TikTok, like leading news creators, they, they do have personality. Th- they are, their face has become their brand attribution.
115
00:19:43.496 --> 00:19:50.316
Um, you see their face and you know you're gonna learn something new. Mm. And that's taken a lot of time for them to build.
116
00:19:50.836 --> 00:20:05.656
And obviously you may, just like if, if you, just like if you loved a morning news program on TV, y- you can love the program without loving every single story they do, but generally you probably, y- you're engaged in most of them.
117
00:20:05.916 --> 00:20:16.176
The, or, you know, half of them. It's, it's exactly the same thing with, for example, news accounts on, on Instagram and TikTok. Um, you know you're gonna learn something new.
118
00:20:16.436 --> 00:20:24.076
Every now and again you're like, "Ah, nah, that doesn't interest me." But most of the time you are invested in listening to these people. And
119
00:20:24.976 --> 00:20:36.276
if you take the example of TikTok, mainstream journalists are not occupying the space. Uh, they aren't going in there and being personalities. I see a bit of it on Instagram.
120
00:20:36.356 --> 00:20:46.296
Um, for some reason Instagram seems more natural for a lot of us to go on rather than TikTok. Um, y- you even don't necessarily many on YouTube either.
121
00:20:46.836 --> 00:21:02.636
Twitter is the easiest, uh, possibly because, you know, it's text-based and you can, um, push out a few tweets during a busy working day. Can you push out a TikTok? You c- you can if you have a skillset, e.g.
122
00:21:02.916 --> 00:21:14.256
you're a video journalist and you, you are equipped to pump these things out very quickly. But if you're not, it really, I think it does feel like an awful lot of effort. What does your social media toolkit contain?
123
00:21:14.296 --> 00:21:25.816
I'm thinking software, hardware. Is it literally just your phone or do you have special microphones and things, special software? What do you use? So I have been thinking that I might amp up what I have.
124
00:21:26.516 --> 00:21:35.356
Um, but up until now, I mean, even to make my TikToks, it's incredibly low production and it literally is just my phone. Um- Mm-hmm...
125
00:21:35.366 --> 00:21:50.086
and s- I mean, sometimes I'll also use my AirPods, but otherwise I don't, I don't even have a sort of a microphone. I may get one though. Um, I'm kind of hoping to make a bit of a better jazzier setup, um- Yeah...
126
00:21:50.196 --> 00:22:00.796
which I'll do over the next couple of months. Um, other than that, obviously I have my laptop. Um, for work I have a camera. I have a Canon 5D. That's what I shoot everything on.
127
00:22:01.176 --> 00:22:18.216
Um, and for my radio, I record with an H5 Zoom. And when I, because everything I do generally is very multimedia, so if I'm making radio I'm also making video, uh, and possibly also doing text as well.
128
00:22:18.396 --> 00:22:31.736
So I need to make sure that my audio quality, if I'm filming, is good enough for radio. So I generally record my audio externally on the Zoom, um, and then I will sync up the audio in the edit with my video.
129
00:22:31.766 --> 00:22:41.285
And I use Final Cut Pro and that's, uh, mainly because that's what I have to use as a BBC journalist because Final Cut Pro is where all our templates live that we use- Right...
130
00:22:41.505 --> 00:22:48.796
to edit video and make them all look, um, in BBC style. So other than that, I'm trying to think. Those are the main tools I use.
131
00:22:48.876 --> 00:22:57.336
I'm guessing Tweet, I'm guessing things like TweetDeck and stuff like that as, are just a standard. But did you use any other publishing tools or was that all really dictated by what the publisher you work for uses, i.e.
132
00:22:57.556 --> 00:23:07.166
BBC for you is using whatever tools you have to, you kind of follow that lead, I guess? Yeah, exactly. Um, I do, I do use tools for my journalism. Mm.
133
00:23:07.296 --> 00:23:16.876
Um, I do use, I found a really good tool the other day where I could analyze, uh, user profiles on Reddit. Um, and I did that. This was for my book. So I did that.
134
00:23:17.036 --> 00:23:32.316
I gathered a sample of users from a particular subreddit and looked at what other subreddits they, um, they were in to see if I could find any kind of connection, um, or similar interests. Uh, what other tools?
135
00:23:33.156 --> 00:23:42.776
There are, um, what's it called? W- is it called what does the public, ask the public? I really like that tool. Ooh Um- Don't, never known that one. I'll have to look one up...
136
00:23:42.836 --> 00:23:59.136
Google Ngrams, um, Google Trends, they're things I use sometimes just to get a, to sort of litmus test whether something's interesting or, or a trend that's changing. Yeah. They're the kind of things that I may use. Um,
137
00:24:00.776 --> 00:24:13.636
otherwise trying to think if there's anything else that I use. In terms of like third party tools to analyze how my content's done, um, I don't really have access- Mm... to anything like that. Not for my personal stuff.
138
00:24:14.256 --> 00:24:26.346
Yeah. Um, I just u- I literally just use the in-platform analytics. Got you. Brilliant. Martin. Yeah. Um, shifting gear a little bit. Um, we notice you're on TikTok's Creator Council. Yeah.
139
00:24:26.476 --> 00:24:35.746
Um, just wonder what that is and, uh, what does it involve and how did you get involved with it? So it sounds very impressive, doesn't it? [laughs] It does.
140
00:24:35.746 --> 00:24:46.016
Sounds like a, a table of creators who govern all from a big table somewhere in the sky or something. I, uh, yeah. I, I mean, I was, I didn't apply for it or anything.
141
00:24:46.176 --> 00:24:59.212
I just got an email one day saying, "We'd love you to join it." And- What I do is very, very small and not impressive, even though it sounds very impressive, and it's literally, um, about, I think, uh, it's, it's this...
142
00:24:59.292 --> 00:25:10.072
I, I'm pretty sure it's a six-month post that I'm probably nearing the end of. But all it is, is they, um, as creators, we can just simply offer our user experience.
143
00:25:10.432 --> 00:25:20.692
Um, and it's a space for us to ask for changes if we'd like them. Um, it's a space for TikTok to say, "Hey, we launched this new feature a month ago. Have you used it? Do you like it?"
144
00:25:21.432 --> 00:25:33.262
Um, it's basically just a chinwag, um- [laughs]... using, I guess, some of our creator expertise. And th- the Creators Council that I'm sitting in, I am by far the least, uh, popular.
145
00:25:33.532 --> 00:25:42.552
I think I probably have the lowest following amongst all of them. Um, but we all do come from really different niches within, within the creative space, which is what I think is quite interesting about being in it.
146
00:25:43.212 --> 00:25:56.652
Um, but yeah, I did get to speak at a TikTok festival in London about a month ago, and I got to meet some of them in real life, which was really nice. Um, because otherwise I don't meet creators day to day.
147
00:25:56.772 --> 00:26:00.052
I do not work with other creators in that sense.
148
00:26:00.092 --> 00:26:17.252
Of course, everyone I work with is a creator because I think j- journalists are creators, but, um, I don't necessarily surround myself with, uh, creators whose lives are completely on these platforms, and I feel like I'm in a weird limbo between the two.
149
00:26:17.932 --> 00:26:28.442
Um, so it was really interesting to actually meet some people as well. You just talked about, there, about features and things. Is there, is there any particular features that you, um, have come across that are lacking?
150
00:26:28.472 --> 00:26:35.872
Things that you think, "Why have they not got this on, on TikTok or in other platforms", particularly around the work you do, uh, uh, in journalism.
151
00:26:36.012 --> 00:26:45.672
Is there, is there some obvious ones that you've already shouted about to, to the people at TikTok? Um, I'm trying to think. All I'm desperate for at the moment, I want, um...
152
00:26:46.202 --> 00:26:54.142
And they will roll out for us, they just haven't yet, because in the US they already have. But, um, automatic captions. Yeah, yeah.
153
00:26:54.172 --> 00:27:01.372
I have to spend quite a lot of time editing my captions to make sure that they are, my videos are more accessible. Um,
154
00:27:02.472 --> 00:27:11.572
and that's not only for people who may have, I don't know, special educational needs, but additionally I have so many people who follow my content for whom English is not their first language.
155
00:27:11.692 --> 00:27:19.962
So having my captions on there is really, really helpful. Um, just like if I was following, like, a Spanish influencer, it, it would help me as well. Mm.
156
00:27:20.132 --> 00:27:28.472
Um, so I just, I'd love them to introduce that so I can spend less time, and that will make, uh, making TikToks take up even less of my time.
157
00:27:29.412 --> 00:27:40.492
So moving away slightly from TikTok, um, but the, some of the questions that, uh, people have asked me who work in journalism are, are, I think, are questions related to newer platforms or newer t- uh, newer sort of formats.
158
00:27:40.532 --> 00:27:48.852
And one of the ones that's been talked about a lot in the last, uh, 6 to 12 months is, is audio, and we're talking on one of them right now with Twitter Spaces- Yeah... and Clubhouse.
159
00:27:49.292 --> 00:28:02.352
Um, and there are, you know, newsletters have had a, a resur- a, you know, resurgence of interest in it, and there, there, there's probably a few others that we could think about that are somewhat flavor of the month at the moment for, for use of, for people consuming content, whether it's news or otherwise.
160
00:28:02.412 --> 00:28:09.702
Um, are these ones that you, uh, ex- excite you? Do you see them as opportunities for journalists that are, are un- as, as yet untapped?
161
00:28:09.772 --> 00:28:20.772
Because at the moment, you know, it's still very early on for, for the likes of Clubhouse and Twitter Spaces, but to me it seems like quite an obvious and, uh, good thing for, for them to tr- try out for, for different formats for, for content.
162
00:28:20.792 --> 00:28:31.212
What, what, what have you made of all of these things that have come out recently? Yeah. I think, um, the minute I am le- I am more time rich, 'cause at the moment I'm so time poor with my book. Mm.
163
00:28:31.252 --> 00:28:40.232
But the minute my book, uh, takes up less of my day to day, um, I got so obsessed with Clubhouse when it did first launch.
164
00:28:40.812 --> 00:28:53.252
Um, and you could see in the terms of, like, battery usage on my phone, the amount of time I was spending on Clubhouse really, really shot up. It was impacting on my Netflix time. Mm. It was impacting on my TikTok time.
165
00:28:53.952 --> 00:29:09.252
Um, and that's because a lot of the Clubhouse chats were just really juicy conversations, and they were talking about really important things that, I think, had I tried to make an appointment to listen to them, I would've forgotten about them, or something else in my life would've taken priority.
166
00:29:09.652 --> 00:29:18.271
But it's the fact that I'd get a notification that an interesting chat is happening, and I would just turn it on, um, and have it on in the background, just like radio.
167
00:29:18.292 --> 00:29:29.932
[laughs] Um, but radio doesn't necessarily notify me that there's an interesting chat happening, whereas Clubhouse does. Therefore, I'm more likely, my smartphone habits mean I'm more likely to tap into it.
168
00:29:30.692 --> 00:29:39.632
Um, I don't know if it's still as compelling, 'cause I think I see less people in my social circles talking about Clubhouse now. Yeah. But, um, I would, will go back in there.
169
00:29:39.712 --> 00:29:52.422
And there is an example in the book where I was on, I was listening to a Clubhouse chat, and I did hear, like, really wild health misinformation. And because the Clubhouse chat was a very much, um,
170
00:29:53.472 --> 00:30:04.282
self-confirming space, it, it was a space where everyone was very like-minded. No one in there was gonna pipe up- Mm... and challenge what had been said. Everyone was just gonna absorb it as, as truth.
171
00:30:04.932 --> 00:30:15.512
Uh, so I think there's probably a lot on Clubhouse that is worth examining. I see so much, um, there's so much finance chat on there and entrepreneurialism chat. There must be finance scams happening.
172
00:30:15.912 --> 00:30:17.992
I just, I haven't looked on there, but there must be.
173
00:30:18.572 --> 00:30:27.872
Do you think that there'd be, the, the, these audio platforms could be used in a way where there's, like, a big s- like, long-running story such as, I don't know, COVID's maybe not the best example from what I'm thinking of.
174
00:30:27.912 --> 00:30:34.352
But certainly a story that is in, in the news cycle frequently and it hasn't got a distinct end date, k- so it's rolling news.
175
00:30:34.792 --> 00:30:44.472
Um, where journalists will find ways to use audio as a way of jumping in, bringing people that are involved in the story, getting it, making it happen live, and just having those live discussions.
176
00:30:44.492 --> 00:30:59.252
Do you see that as a way that audio could be used in, in the news production or in f- for some of these news companies, or, or is it something that you just don't think is gonna be whetting the appetites of people, or it's too tricky to organize, or it doesn't make sense with all the other things that a journalist might have to do?
177
00:30:59.322 --> 00:31:09.583
'Cause to me it seems like a, an obvious thing that they might try and do as a journalist. I don't know. I would counter that and say, why does the company have to do it? Mm. Why can't individual journalists do it?
178
00:31:10.384 --> 00:31:20.544
Um, I think the minute the, the company does it, um, I don't know if that is in line with these personality trends that we're seeing.
179
00:31:21.904 --> 00:31:26.724
Well, then that leads, uh, neatly into a, into a, a relevant question, and that's the question around creators.
180
00:31:26.804 --> 00:31:36.844
Because one of the things that has changed over the last 12 months, um, sig- significantly is this role of the creator, the buzzword creator economy, and then all these monetization tools.
181
00:31:37.184 --> 00:31:43.524
And then we've seen a lot of journalists, or at least a number of journalists, jump into a kind of inde- more of an independent role.
182
00:31:43.564 --> 00:31:49.784
So they've got their own Substack, they've got their own kind of paid-for community they've developed, and their own personal brand, you know.
183
00:31:50.144 --> 00:32:03.644
I would say someone like Taylor Lorenz shares a lot of the similarities in many ways with the things that you do, you know, in terms of works in journalism, is very much a heavy user of social, you know, is big o- and, and into TikTok and in that kind of w- that whole environment.
184
00:32:03.654 --> 00:32:13.124
Um, but that, that, that causes quite a lot of friction, I would imagine, with, with between the journalist and the, the employer who's giving them the, the, you know, opportunity to, to write for them, whatever.
185
00:32:13.544 --> 00:32:22.594
Um, do, do you see that as a big shift, or do you think this is just a small thing that can run neatly alongside people's jobs whilst working for a BBC or a, a New York Times?
186
00:32:22.624 --> 00:32:32.794
Or do you think there is, there's friction that's gonna continue to cause trouble there for people who wanna create a personal brand like the, your own personal brand versus that of, of BBC or whoever you work for? It...
187
00:32:32.864 --> 00:32:38.264
Just I'd be interested to get your views on, on that shift in, in the way that people operate now as in that space. Yeah.
188
00:32:38.544 --> 00:32:54.044
I would instinctively see this new space as really good news for freelancers and people with multi-hyphenate careers, um, who pe- perhaps work for some of these major outlets, but not necessarily full time.
189
00:32:54.624 --> 00:32:58.524
Um, that's where I see some of these spaces being most useful.
190
00:32:59.064 --> 00:33:09.524
It is inevitable obviously that if you work for a major out- outlet, and you work for them full time, and all of your content is gonna be kind of associated with them, it, it, it makes sense.
191
00:33:09.554 --> 00:33:15.564
And it's, in many cases, you know, it's right that there is some, um, you know, you need to have some boundaries.
192
00:33:16.124 --> 00:33:32.584
But I, I, I j- I think it offers so many opportunities for people who aren't journalists, um, and who don't come from the places that do traditionally get all the power and access to use these tools and be heard.
193
00:33:32.844 --> 00:33:41.014
That's what's so exciting about it, and that's not a new conversation. I remember when I first entered journalism, people were talking about citizen journalism.
194
00:33:41.844 --> 00:33:56.304
Um, and that's something that's been around that's far predated social media. Um, so yeah, it's, it, I- it is a tricky one, but just because there's friction doesn't mean that you can't innovate. Yeah.
195
00:33:56.404 --> 00:34:21.304
I think, uh, it certainly seems like some of the f- forward thinking, maybe that's the politest way, nicest way of sort of framing it, uh, publishers are trying to find working relationships or working models that allow for the independence of the writer to create a, a brand for themself, which in- inevitably will generate, you know, more page views, more listeners, more views, whatever it is that they're hoping to gain from having, you know, this person write for them or, or present for them.
196
00:34:21.404 --> 00:34:28.404
Um, building the... helping them build a brand around that i- i- 'cause personalities are what sells news more than, than the many other things these days.
197
00:34:28.484 --> 00:34:45.304
So, uh, to me, it makes sense, but I, but I can certainly see some of the sort of legacy publishers struggling with the, the concept of having, uh, someone who's got their own brand and, and maybe monetizing it and finding a way to make a, a side hustle alongside their job as a paid-for employed member of, of the, of the journalist team.
198
00:34:45.364 --> 00:34:52.353
But, but, um, but Martyn, there were some other topics we were gonna pick up as well, 'cause I know we're conscious that we've been speaking for like 10 or 15 minutes into the second stamina list- Yeah...
199
00:34:52.364 --> 00:35:03.764
and I don't wanna keep Sophia longer than maybe she, she needs to. So w- what else have we got on the list? Yeah. Yeah. So we, um, are in the age of misinformation and fake news and, and all of that.
200
00:35:03.804 --> 00:35:10.644
And, uh, you k- joined the BBC while that had already kinda kicked off with the election of, uh, Donald Trump.
201
00:35:11.224 --> 00:35:21.674
And, uh, so you've maybe got a different perspective on this than someone who's maybe been in journalism for years and looks at this and goes, "Ah, uh, we've lost all trust of our audience," and, and, and that kind of thing.
202
00:35:21.734 --> 00:35:41.984
So I just wonder what your perspective is on keeping audience trust, especially when you look at social media and you look at, uh, even the, um, the BBC's misinformation reporter, uh, just gets a load of abuse about, uh, how, um, you know, how, how what they're saying is misinformation even though they're reporting on misinformation.
203
00:35:42.404 --> 00:35:57.824
So it's a complex minefield. And, uh, how do you approach that? Um, it's tricky because it, I, I don't gen- I am not someone who generally faces much online abuse.
204
00:35:58.504 --> 00:36:10.324
Um, and I don't generally... I'm also not actually employed to be a reporter. Yeah. So I'm not a news reporter technically. All the news reporting I do has been outside the remit of my role.
205
00:36:11.124 --> 00:36:23.304
Um, but certainly in the times when I have done reports, um, if, if someone does message something that's a bit nasty, I always counter it with kindness and more information.
206
00:36:23.924 --> 00:36:35.204
Um, I don't believe in kind of being snide and mean, and, "How can you think that? That's stupid." [laughs] Like, that would never be me. Um, and I have always, with my videos,
207
00:36:36.154 --> 00:36:42.564
um, that I've made for Heart N Soul, um, after I've published the videos, I do spend time in the comment sections.
208
00:36:42.624 --> 00:36:55.724
And if I see people sharing things that are just really, really wrong and inaccurate about a faith group, I will reply. I will say, "Hello. I made this video. Actually, blah, blah, blah, blah." Mm. Um, "Have a nice day."
209
00:36:56.104 --> 00:37:06.304
[laughs] Uh, again, I, I don't wanna ever be seen as being... It's not only about being seen as mean. I don't wanna be seen as patronizing as well. Um, because often-
210
00:37:07.384 --> 00:37:19.944
I, that's not how you're gonna persuade someone into, um, reading your fact, uh, and, you know, absorbing it and hopefully not sharing misinformation again. But I would say
211
00:37:20.844 --> 00:37:26.844
what I try to do, and very much part of why I am on TikTok, is that people get to know me
212
00:37:27.764 --> 00:37:42.104
and they have a direct r- they feel like they have a direct relationship with me, and that, for example, if something really, um, bad or, or simply mad happened in their lives, they would feel like they could tell me about it.
213
00:37:42.864 --> 00:37:48.264
Um, and while that's not necessarily about countering misinformation, that is about building trust.
214
00:37:48.544 --> 00:37:54.344
I think we do need to think about building trusting relationships that aren't necessarily about countering misinformation.
215
00:37:54.864 --> 00:38:10.664
Building trust is also how we, we tell better stories, full stop, because more people will talk to us, more people will, um, be happy sharing something with us, and they're not, and they're gonna know that, um, in speaking to us, we also, you know, protect them in some way.
216
00:38:10.744 --> 00:38:20.084
We aren't gonna take advantage. Um, so for me, trust, uh, is actually more about that than it is about, um, explicit countering misinformation.
217
00:38:20.124 --> 00:38:33.564
However, in, in my future career and changing job roles, that might change, and I may see that challenge as actually, um, taking up more of my time. But for now, it's more about simply connecting with people. Yeah.
218
00:38:33.574 --> 00:38:56.604
Um, one, one of the other areas of concern that we were just gonna pick up on before we wrap things up today is, and this discussion around the topic that comes up every time you speak about Facebook or TikTok and Twitter and social media, and that's its role, uh, its somewhat negative, uh, role it plays in society and, and the dangers it presents particularly to young and vulnerable users and what their level of responsibility is as a, as a company.
219
00:38:56.764 --> 00:39:10.104
But also how much actually should we be laying at the door of, of a Facebook or a TikTok in terms of the concerns we have around polarization and many other, these other topics we've sort of touched on, uh, in the last 20 minutes or so.
220
00:39:10.124 --> 00:39:17.864
But you, you know, you operate in this space as, as, as much as any journalist does, and also, uh, I'm sure have a view on, on these platforms.
221
00:39:17.904 --> 00:39:26.144
I just wonder what your take is on, on kind of the real and present danger these platforms present to, to, certainly to younger audiences.
222
00:39:26.344 --> 00:39:35.104
Um, and also how much responsibility do you think they have as, as companies versus maybe parents and teachers have versus governments and regulators.
223
00:39:35.424 --> 00:39:43.524
So just wanted to get your spin on, on that, having been in this space for some time and, and, and reported on it, I guess. Um, I, I...
224
00:39:43.804 --> 00:39:51.244
This is a very, uh, impartial answer, but [laughs] I think everyone could be doing a bit better. That is what I think. That's my honest opinion.
225
00:39:51.744 --> 00:40:05.024
Everyone from, from the people with the highest and greatest amounts of power to Joe Bloggs who sees a nasty comment online, um, and doesn't bother reporting it when they could be reporting it. Um,
226
00:40:06.444 --> 00:40:19.324
it, in my, I can s- personally, I can sp- speak from, um, the more I've reported on all of this, the more I've become an active... B- I don't know if this is the right way to describe it, but, like, a,
227
00:40:20.564 --> 00:40:29.084
a, a bystander, but an active bystander. So if I do see a nasty comment online, it's irrelevant that it wasn't directed at me, I still report it.
228
00:40:29.184 --> 00:40:34.304
Um, I don't know if people get taught at school, at, you know, at schools now that that should be something that you do.
229
00:40:34.784 --> 00:40:48.824
I think we talk a lot about reporting abuse, like report abuse directed at you, and it's like, yes, we do need to do that, but we also need to make sure that other people, um, are happy and healthy as well.
230
00:40:49.884 --> 00:40:58.064
Um, so I think everyone. Do you think we're expecting too much of them? Everyone is people. Do you think it, do you think the media criticizes social media platforms too much?
231
00:40:58.133 --> 00:41:11.844
And do you think that we as a society or as a, um, or as individuals are expecting or have unrealistic expectations of what can be done in terms of the issues such as, you know, trolling and, and abuse of people and harassment and things like that?
232
00:41:12.124 --> 00:41:23.784
Yeah. Uh, what, what's your take on that? I 100% agree with that because I think that obviously the things that are gonna make news stories are often negative.
233
00:41:24.763 --> 00:41:45.564
Um, and even if I look at my own life, the role that the internet has played in making parts of my life so much better, my health, my relationships, my access and knowledge about my own human rights, um, I have gained from the internet.
234
00:41:45.744 --> 00:42:03.284
Connectivity, meeting people, uh, learning languages, all of these things have been infinitely improved by being able to find community online in a way that I can't find in my physical life, or I can find it in my physical life, but to a limit.
235
00:42:04.044 --> 00:42:18.124
Um, and there's only so much time in the day, especially for me, and the internet really helps me max out my life as much as I possibly can. Um, I really grew up with the internet.
236
00:42:18.504 --> 00:42:27.984
I can remember my earliest friendships and relationships really being informed and shadowed by the internet. And
237
00:42:29.204 --> 00:42:42.164
as much badness as it causes, my life has really been infinitely improved by all the wonderful connections that I have been able to make. Um, I would not, I possibly wouldn't even be a journalist without it.
238
00:42:42.784 --> 00:42:50.524
Um, and I wouldn't be the journalist that I am without it either. That's such an optimistic, uh, kind of- It is. It really is... orsun- I, I like it.
239
00:42:50.944 --> 00:43:01.684
[laughs] Because that, that's the kind of attitude people had to the internet, uh, and to social media 10 years ago, and we've lost that, and it's great to see that people, even though we don't hear it shared that much, that pe- some people still think that.
240
00:43:01.804 --> 00:43:03.974
That's, that's great to hear. Absolutely. It does.
241
00:43:03.974 --> 00:43:14.544
And actually, uh, as we're wrapping some of these bits and pieces up, because I've, um, I think we've got like a couple of minutes and I'm gonna let, uh, Sophia have the rest of her day to herself, is, you know, what, who are the people that you, you, excite you online at the moment?
242
00:43:14.704 --> 00:43:23.784
You know, com- uh, and whether it's because they're doing amazing journalisticy things, they're just incredible creators, or they're people that are telling really important stories.
243
00:43:23.884 --> 00:43:30.784
You, you're in and around this stuff all day long, so you'll be as good as anyone to, to tell us who, who should be inspiring us or who is inspiring you. Who, who should we look for?
244
00:43:31.496 --> 00:43:37.436
I mean, you compared me to Taylor earlier, and I died because I'm in love with Taylor. I just think her journalism is amazing. She is great. She's pretty awesome.
245
00:43:37.456 --> 00:43:51.176
Um, but from, from a journalistic perspective, she is who I aspire, uh, to be more like. Um, if I speak about creators, I mean, my For You page on TikTok, because I look for content that informs me- Mm-hmm...
246
00:43:51.186 --> 00:43:52.636
um, I get fed it, which is very nice.
247
00:43:53.156 --> 00:44:05.276
So, um, there's a great creator on there called Benji who talks a lot about, um, systemic racial injustice and, and the h- how to meet it and compute it in day-to-day life that I've really benefited from.
248
00:44:05.316 --> 00:44:15.976
He's an excellent example of, um, TikTok style, uh, and how that can work well. Um, gosh, who else? Um- What about also about publishers?
249
00:44:16.016 --> 00:44:27.506
For, for those who, who are kind of like maybe fed up with kind of following one particular news publisher and they're not getting that kind of the source, source, the, the quality of the news that they want or want a different take and a different spin on it, are there other...
250
00:44:27.876 --> 00:44:30.606
We, we'll assume that you think BBC is the best thing ever- [laughs]...
251
00:44:30.616 --> 00:44:40.116
but aside from BBC, can you tell us sort of some of, some of the, um, publishers that you follow or maybe some of the journalists that, other than Taylor of course, that you, you find quite good on, on these platforms at the moment?
252
00:44:41.836 --> 00:44:57.075
Hmm. Gotta be honest, I get most of my news from social media. I do not follow publishers. Um, I- if I wasn't a journalist, I'd be a massive news avoider. Really? I, I am really a person of my generation.
253
00:44:57.216 --> 00:45:02.596
I, I probably wouldn't see a lot of it. Um, I subscribe to The New York Times.
254
00:45:02.796 --> 00:45:11.126
Would you say, do you think that's actually, uh, uh, something that is a generational thing then, in the sense that m- me, I'm, I'm a little bit older than you, not much, a little bit [laughs]
255
00:45:11.126 --> 00:45:18.736
But I certainly, you know, will d- gravitate to certain news publishers, and increasingly now in the last few years, individual writers and reporters as well.
256
00:45:19.166 --> 00:45:23.776
Um, and so I will think of like Now This or, or an Al Jazeera or a BBC or a Sky whatever.
257
00:45:24.176 --> 00:45:40.736
Um, but it sounds to me as, um, having spoken to yourself and a few other people, uh, in, I guess in your generation of people, that it's more about the, uh, the, the stories and the individuals, and it's, it's the brand of the news and maybe the, the kind of, uh, the thing that overrides it is, is less important.
258
00:45:40.816 --> 00:45:48.396
It's more about individuals. And, and I don't know if that is a generational thing or whether it's a shift in just the way we all consume news. I don't know what your thoughts are on that.
259
00:45:49.216 --> 00:46:00.506
Uh, I do think some of it is generational, 'cause even when I speak to friends of mine who aren't journalists, um, they are kind of semi-religious fanatics of certain podcasts- Mm-hmm...
260
00:46:00.526 --> 00:46:09.936
which I think is a bit like what you're describing as well. I used to be, too, but none of the podcasts that I listened to, again, were newsy. Um, they were always comedians. Um,
261
00:46:12.076 --> 00:46:27.556
I also have a lot of friends who follow YouTubers, and I am increasingly following more YouTubers who, who share interesting content that is newsy. But they're, again, not journalists, but they are filmmakers. Um,
262
00:46:29.436 --> 00:46:42.016
so you could be onto something there. Um, but I, I really don't know how much of it is informed by my job, um, that makes me, you know, not a reflective representative sample. [laughs] Okey-doke.
263
00:46:42.096 --> 00:46:52.156
Well, um, I'm conscious of the time, and so th- uh, maybe you could just quickly tell us a bit about what's coming up for you then, because I know that you're leaving the, uh, the BBC, and you've not quite yet revealed your full plans.
264
00:46:52.196 --> 00:46:55.696
I haven't. But you've also got this book that you're writing, and there's, uh, probably lots of other bits and pieces.
265
00:46:55.776 --> 00:47:05.236
So, so what does take up your time at the moment, or what is it your, your, people, where people can find you and what you're doing? Yeah. So you can, you can find me on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok.
266
00:47:05.276 --> 00:47:11.416
They're the places that I'm most active. Um, the book is taking up most of my time, and that's gonna be out in January.
267
00:47:11.676 --> 00:47:16.726
And it's, uh, published by Harper Collins, called Losing It: Dispelling the Sex Myths that Rule our Lives.
268
00:47:17.406 --> 00:47:40.756
And it's me, um, investigating and debunking lots of the sex myths that have been handed down to us either by, uh, faith or cultural backgrounds or even, um, medical myths, um, that have perpetuated despite studies coming out and, and debunking them, um, which has been thrilling to write and is full of internet culture things.
269
00:47:40.916 --> 00:47:43.516
So- How, how did you-... if you're listening-... decide that?... you'll actually like it. Sorry?
270
00:47:43.536 --> 00:47:50.956
How did you, how did you come to w- and decide that that was something you wanted to write about and it was, uh, substantial enough for you to write about? Where, where did that interest come from? Yeah.
271
00:47:50.996 --> 00:47:59.006
It began as I got approached to write a book, which was very exciting. Um, but that happens to a lot... I've discovered that happens to a lot of people. But then
272
00:47:59.956 --> 00:48:07.616
getting a successful book proposal is not what happens necessarily. Mm-hmm. So I'm really l- fortunate that I had wonderful support from my editor, Grace Pangelli.
273
00:48:08.156 --> 00:48:25.576
But, um, originally it was gonna be a book about virginity, and this idea, it, uh, in my research I came to learn and understand how, wow, actually virgini- virginity is this sort of destructive origin myth that we're first told about sex.
274
00:48:25.616 --> 00:48:33.936
And then as we go through our lives and reach sexual maturity, you sort of learn, actually, what is this all about? I've been fed lots of lies.
275
00:48:34.036 --> 00:48:42.136
Uh, I also don't necessarily have access to an ethical, pleasurable sex life, and it turns out it's because of all the, all these things I've been told that simply aren't true.
276
00:48:42.996 --> 00:49:06.396
Um, so some of it is informed by personal experience, uh, but mainly it's informed by all these interviews that I've been doing around the world with, um, everyone from hymen repair surgeons to pornographers to, uh, a lot of doctors and sex therapists, but mainly normal people just trying to lead happy, normal lives, uh, and sort of being confounded by all this misinformation they've been given.
277
00:49:07.296 --> 00:49:16.156
Um, but yeah, other than that, uh, I'm, I'm sort of tidying those edits up. I'm getting excited for my new role. Um, there'll be news about it soon hopefully.
278
00:49:16.456 --> 00:49:31.056
Um, I am still a reporter, so if you have, if anyone has something that they think they'd love me to cover, um, I'm always here ready to report on new stories, um, and look for new stories ahead of my new job as well.
279
00:49:31.216 --> 00:49:43.566
Um, so it's a lot of change. Hope- I will be TikToking. I'll continue to TikTok and Instagram and Reddit and Discord and maybe try Twitch. It depends how much time I have in the day. Yeah.
280
00:49:43.576 --> 00:49:53.976
But, um, yeah, it's still, it's still [laughs] social media- [laughs] The social media side of my journalism is not gonna stop. If anything, it's gonna get bigger. Thanks to Sophia for taking the time to talk with us.
281
00:49:54.076 --> 00:50:05.896
That was a lot of fun. We'll be back soon with our next interview, when we'll be talking to David Carroll and Carol Cadwalladr from activist group the self-styled Real Facebook Oversight Board. Look out for that soon.
282
00:50:05.916 --> 00:50:11.376
In the meantime, don't forget that you can join the Geekout community by searching for the Social Media Geekout group on Facebook.
283
00:50:11.636 --> 00:50:18.636
And why not subscribe to my Geekout newsletter with all the week's social media news and discussion in your inbox for free every Friday?
284
00:50:19.256 --> 00:50:26.196
Or my newsletter, Tech Revolution, which brings you all of the most important tech news from the week if you want to understand the future.
285
00:50:26.656 --> 00:50:37.356
I make sense of the biggest, most impactful stories to help you understand what's coming next. Links to all of those are in the show notes for this episode. We'll be back soon. But for now, goodbye, geeks.
286
00:50:38.016 --> 00:50:47.176
[outro music]
1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:15.760
It's time to Geek Out. [upbeat music] Hello, and welcome to Geek Out with Matt Navarra, with me, Matt Navarra. And me, Martin SFP Bryant.
2
00:00:16.140 --> 00:00:28.740
Now, what happens when you cross a professional news report about a stuck ship on the Suez Canal with a sea shanty? The answer was one of BBC journalist Sophia Smith Galer's biggest hits on TikTok. Yes.
3
00:00:28.840 --> 00:00:38.820
Sophia has made a name for herself using TikTok to explain both news stories and how journalism itself works, and she joined us live on Twitter Spaces to talk about her work and her career.
4
00:00:38.830 --> 00:00:46.400
And there's far more to her than just a few viral hits. So we chatted about everything from dealing with negativity online to her social media toolkit.
5
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:58.059
This is a really fun conversation if you're interested in how news works on social media and how a new generation of journalists are forging careers that put their own identity front and center.
6
00:00:58.100 --> 00:01:08.940
Sophia has announced that she's leaving the BBC soon for pastures new, so this was a great time to chat to her. Here's what happened when we spoke to Sophia Smith Galer. Hi. Hey, both. How are you doing, Matt and Martin?
7
00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:16.580
I'm good. I'm, I'm reading on the news that your life is changing. We're gonna come onto all of that in a minute because you've got some, all sorts of things going on in your world.
8
00:01:16.660 --> 00:01:24.620
But, um, but yeah, what's, uh, what's the week been like for you to date? Have you started off with a, a usual working week, or have you had a day off, or? No, it's been a usual working week.
9
00:01:24.720 --> 00:01:29.280
The last fortnight I've been on and off with book edits, which has been very exciting. Um- Ooh...
10
00:01:29.360 --> 00:01:43.700
but no, I am, I'm back working this week, um, on my next couple of, uh, BBC Radio docs, which, um, are gonna be my last, uh, for now as- Oh. Oh... you know. Well, we- Little BBC journo. Yeah...
11
00:01:43.730 --> 00:01:50.520
w- we're gonna dig into all of that stuff, but th- maybe the first thing that would be worth starting off with is I've got a little bit of a background on, on what you've done up until now.
12
00:01:50.620 --> 00:01:59.380
You can correct me and us if we're wrong on any of these. You, you did a master's, is that right, in broadcast journalism in London. Is that right? Yes, I did. Yes. And you started doing work for the BBC.
13
00:01:59.440 --> 00:02:07.600
Was that kind of your first job out of that kind of studies, or w- did you do other things before then? It was my first proper job, as it were.
14
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:22.609
But, um, before I'd left that master's, I had done a couple of cool other things. I'd worked on a, a BBC One documentary. Um, I'd spent some time with NBC's London bureau as well. Uh, that was all during the master's.
15
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:33.260
But yeah, my first proper job was social media producer at bbc.com. And what does that involve then? When, 'cause the j- title social media producer could n- could be construed as many things.
16
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:43.180
Is that basically a journalist, but it's geared towards content that goes on social, or is it a specific aspect of the production of news for social? What, how, uh, you know, tell us a bit about that. Yeah.
17
00:02:43.220 --> 00:02:54.700
So it was specifically for... So bbc.com straddles the US and UK, and I was working for the two feature sites that are in the UK- Mm... which are BBC Culture and BBC Future.
18
00:02:55.480 --> 00:03:03.000
And the job before me, uh, it was, uh, two different people held those roles, and I was the first to do both of them, uh, in my role together.
19
00:03:03.470 --> 00:03:18.020
And it meant that the work was really varied because I had to make, um, social media content on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram for both of those verticals. So nice m- you know, Future covers tech, science,
20
00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:28.740
lots of random things like psychology, the world of tomorrow. And Culture, pretty self-explanatory. It would be music, arts, literature. So it was really varied.
21
00:03:29.300 --> 00:03:38.710
And I would, a lot of my job would be figuring out ways to promote text, these text features on social media. Yeah.
22
00:03:38.780 --> 00:03:52.079
Um, it would be working with video producers to maybe make some videos out of text features we anticipated would do well, uh, as, as social video. Um, and then like you say, I did a lot more than that.
23
00:03:52.160 --> 00:04:00.720
I, I wrote features myself. I made videos myself. Um, it was a bit of a mix, yeah. Okay. And so then you moved on and worked for the World Service.
24
00:04:00.760 --> 00:04:08.840
And, am I, am I right in saying also that for that, your job title changed again, and you was more of a visual journalist. Is that what they call it at the BBC? Yes, a visual journalist.
25
00:04:09.060 --> 00:04:18.740
Um, and it is depend- like, it does change what that means. So some people who are visual journalists at the BBC actually deal with visualizing data. Yeah. That was not my job.
26
00:04:18.899 --> 00:04:32.080
Uh, really I was just more of a- [laughs]... of a video journalist. So it was, it's my job to make sure that Heart N Soul, the religion documentary strand of the BBC World Service, has a digital presence. Um- Yeah...
27
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:40.920
so sometimes that means making a video for them. Sometimes that, um, it might not be making a video, but it would be sort of creating Instagram content for it.
28
00:04:41.320 --> 00:04:53.380
Just finding a way, or even if it's just an interesting way to tweet it out, just finding a way for it to reach digital audiences because obviously it's already reaching radio audiences. Yeah, yeah.
29
00:04:53.420 --> 00:04:57.740
And then you, so you worked quite heavily on the, the sort of faith content for the BBC, didn't you?
30
00:04:57.770 --> 00:05:05.969
And sort of some of the user-generated stuff, and particularly around, like, an, uh, the Instagram account for BBC World. Was it for BBC World that you were doing that for? Was that, or was it one of the sub brands?
31
00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:15.780
BBC... Yeah, BBC World Service- Right... uh, is who it was for. Um- Yeah... and they, I pitched that Instagram account in my job interview. Right. So it didn't exist before I came.
32
00:05:16.680 --> 00:05:25.460
And how did you approach that 'cause the topic of religion is always [laughs] a contentious one? Mm. I know I put some of the content that talks about things to do with politics or religion in my Facebook group.
33
00:05:25.520 --> 00:05:32.980
I'm always a bit like, "Oh, if, unless this is a really important story, it's gonna cause a lot of friction and a lot of tension. There's a lot of polarization."
34
00:05:33.380 --> 00:05:41.300
So that must have been quite a, a challenging role I would imagine, or did you find it easier than you imagined, like, dealing with the topic of faith, uh, on social?
35
00:05:42.100 --> 00:05:51.700
You are right that especially in comment sections it can drive some vitriol. Mm. But I think it's also because of the kind of stories that I do.
36
00:05:51.760 --> 00:06:03.060
They're not necessarily on the diary kind of news stories, that, that it's slower journalism. It's more featurey, documentary. Um, and by nature of Heart N Soul being a doc program, um, I think-
37
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:14.060
We do sometimes avoid that, like, really nasty side of the internet. Um- Yeah... but with Instagram, my strategy was use,
38
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:29.600
uh, BBC World Service and other BBC outlets' content that was around religion, spirituality, and complement that with content that was simply, it only ever went out on our Instagram account.
39
00:06:29.660 --> 00:06:38.400
So sometimes that would be Instagram bespoke. Films I'd make or posts I'd do, or I remember in the very beginning I would do seasons.
40
00:06:38.430 --> 00:06:43.660
So each month we'd focus on something different, be it sacred music, be it faith and fashion.
41
00:06:44.300 --> 00:06:53.780
Um, and I would try and, and involve people who were influencers in the religious space to get involved with the Instagram account. Yeah. Um, and as a way to grow it early on.
42
00:06:54.420 --> 00:07:01.860
And was BBC pretty good with that in terms of kind of giving you some level of autonomy, in terms of letting you put your own kind of thoughts into that?
43
00:07:01.940 --> 00:07:11.940
Or, or is it, is it quite bureaucratic and, and it's quite difficult in that, in that sort of environment with BBC compared to maybe a Sky News or another sort of more sort of profit-driven, uh, organization?
44
00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:22.800
How, how's that been? I, um, I was given a lot of freedom with that Instagram account, and I really enjoyed it, and it wouldn't have grown at, at the rate that it did if I didn't have that freedom.
45
00:07:22.880 --> 00:07:30.710
Uh, so I had a really great time running it. Oh. Well, I w- I think what we, I guess we should ch- talk a little bit about is TikTok, because I guess- [clears throat]...
46
00:07:30.710 --> 00:07:42.740
most people are familiar with a lot of the stuff that you've done in, in relation to TikTok, whether it's because you've talked about the, um, the platform or you've done something on the platform yourself and you've, you know, been in the news in relation to TikTok.
47
00:07:43.020 --> 00:07:58.320
So I guess one of the questions I wanted to ask you about is kind of, um, how much of your r- role now revolves around, like, the, the, that specific platform, or do you treat it more as social platforms more broadly and it just happens to be that TikTok for you is one that you favor and find it most interesting, you know?
48
00:07:58.360 --> 00:08:11.280
Where does it sit amongst, uh, the mix of things? It's really difficult to answer that really because especially as I'm in this weird life limbo at the moment- Yeah... and it's all probably about to change slightly.
49
00:08:11.740 --> 00:08:11.859
Yeah.
50
00:08:11.980 --> 00:08:30.820
Um, but I mean, up until now it's been this bizarre platform that has provided me with so much, so many ideas, uh, such a big audience that I never thought I would really be able to access, certainly not at this stage in my career, uh, this early on.
51
00:08:30.900 --> 00:08:44.880
Uh, however, it is the one app that I use day to day, which the BBC is not on, uh, BBC editorial news content that is. So- Why is that? Oh, I don't know. That's sort of- [laughs]... a pay grade, Matt. I wouldn't know.
52
00:08:44.980 --> 00:08:55.570
[laughs] Fair enough. Fair enough. Martin. Yeah. So, so how did you break through on TikTok? Was there one video that kind of clicked with the audience and you thought, "Ooh, I'm onto something here"?
53
00:08:57.560 --> 00:09:07.240
The first video I made was all because I had heard about TikTok. I'd been on there for a few days, weeks. Thought, "Oh yeah, this is fun."
54
00:09:07.700 --> 00:09:14.929
And at the time it was so nascent, um, I was the only person my age who I knew had even gone on it out of curiosity.
55
00:09:15.560 --> 00:09:24.440
Um, and I, you know, as a video journalist, I just thought, "Hmm, I should know what this is about in- just in case the BBC comes on it." [laughs] "I should know how it works.
56
00:09:24.940 --> 00:09:28.960
I don't wanna, uh, I don't suddenly have to use it for work and look like an idiot."
57
00:09:29.020 --> 00:09:41.060
So I started making, um, a video which was based on a trend that I'd seen, uh, and that's because I'd spent time on TikTok and I saw a number of people doing the same audio meme. So I thought, "Oh, okay. I'll do it."
58
00:09:41.400 --> 00:09:53.160
I did it and it blew up and it gave me, I think I got 4,000 followers just from that one video over a s- short space of days, and I just kept making them.
59
00:09:53.250 --> 00:10:03.440
Anyone who's ever gone viral before knows that the hit of virality is infectious. Mm-hmm. So you get it and then you think, "God, I wanna do it again. I want that to happen again."
60
00:10:04.140 --> 00:10:16.440
Um, and so when you have a video tank you think, "Oh, no." You know? [laughs] You get really, uh, upset and then, then you have a video do really well, uh, it feels deeply gratifying and validating.
61
00:10:16.640 --> 00:10:27.680
So that's basically what kept me on there. And then the longer time I spent on there, the more I realized that, "Oh, this could be useful. This could be a useful journalistic tool for me.
62
00:10:27.740 --> 00:10:38.920
It's not just something to have fun on." [laughs] And obviously over the past couple of years, we have really seen it become an app that provides us with so many different types of content.
63
00:10:39.160 --> 00:10:51.600
Increasingly, lots of it is very creative, very engaging, very informative. Um, it's not simply a place where we joke around or we share, um, sort of relatable content.
64
00:10:51.660 --> 00:11:01.120
It's also very much become an information space, an information sharing space. Is the, is the instance of going viral on TikTok, do you think it's different?
65
00:11:01.180 --> 00:11:17.100
There's something about it that's s- somewhat unique compared to going viral with a tweet on, on Twitter and, and y- and second part to that question, do you think that TikTok is somewhat unique amongst the social platforms, particularly in your world of, of social in, in journalism?
66
00:11:17.520 --> 00:11:26.440
Is there something special about it or is it just another social platform? I can... This is completely based on my personal experience, so other people may have found something different.
67
00:11:26.460 --> 00:11:37.950
But I have found that I, in terms of reaching an audience that is not yet connected to me, i.e. they may not already follow me, they may not even follow any of my acquaintances.
68
00:11:38.540 --> 00:11:47.980
For me to reach them rapidly, I know that, oh, if I make a good enough TikTok, I'll reach them, and I'll reach them within a day, two days. Mm.
69
00:11:48.120 --> 00:11:56.200
Um, I, I know that a tweet or Instagram post wouldn't necessarily deliver me, um,
70
00:11:57.120 --> 00:12:10.216
what I'd want, which would be a lot of people getting in touch with me, um, or even a lot of people- Sim- simply sharing something that could then lead me onto the next tip and the next tip after that. Mm.
71
00:12:10.416 --> 00:12:23.736
Um, so, so it's that speed that i- is very efficient for me. Mm. Um, that being said, that this, that only comes with having developed a profile on there, which is not efficient. [laughs] It's a lot of- Mm...
72
00:12:23.936 --> 00:12:31.456
it's a lot of work every day. Um- Got it... and, or every week. Yeah. So it's tricky. And, and what, what's- Yeah... and what's cut through the most for you?
73
00:12:31.496 --> 00:12:38.896
Then what's, what's the video that you think has cut through the most for you and been most successful in terms of it- its impact, sup- both on TikTok and beyond?
74
00:12:38.976 --> 00:12:47.776
'Cause these things reach out and, you know, I've seen your stuff far more on Twitter, I suppose, than I have on TikTok, so, um, because people have shared it and go, "Hey, check out this." Yeah.
75
00:12:47.816 --> 00:12:55.176
And I deliberately don't share most of my TikToks on Twitter- Mm... 'cause that's how I work out who's actually following me on TikTok or not.
76
00:12:55.216 --> 00:13:04.256
[laughs] Um, and I even, even on Instagram, I don't of- I often don't share a lot of my TikTok content either. Um,
77
00:13:05.476 --> 00:13:18.116
there are two ways that I measure impact with TikTok, and again, it's dependent on, on various things that I like to do, and I appreciate the same video doesn't necessarily achieve all these different things that I like to do.
78
00:13:18.176 --> 00:13:28.636
So you could make a video that gets you loads of new followers, but it may not necessarily, um, help me with a story that I'm currently working on, for example. Mm. However, it's all useful.
79
00:13:28.956 --> 00:13:36.736
It's all beneficial to, to me growing my audience and that audience being there when I do have a new story or when I do need new information.
80
00:13:37.416 --> 00:13:51.186
Um, so if we take an example that put me on people's radar, like the Suez Canal Sea Shanties, a really brilliant example of that. Um, it put me on such a big, um, you know, megaphone- [laughs]...
81
00:13:51.196 --> 00:14:01.236
that it got me on the, on the front page of Egypt's, uh, newspap- most read newspaper. It got me on Greg James' [laughs] One Breakfast Show. I remember this. Yeah.
82
00:14:01.296 --> 00:14:11.175
Like, if you'd said to me, "Sofia, figure out a way for you to get your journalism on, um, the front page of an Egyptian newspaper and Greg James' show," I'd have been like, "Uh, gosh, what am I gonna have to do to do that?"
83
00:14:11.696 --> 00:14:24.556
Well, it was a Suez Canal Sea Shanty. Um, but then there are other videos that I've made that ha- have had maybe 30,000 views, 40,000 views. Natively, there is no way I'd get that amount of views with a Twitter video.
84
00:14:25.216 --> 00:14:37.116
Um, even though I have, you know, a not completely tiny Twitter following, but if I, if I just put a video out there, it would get maybe 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 views if I'm lucky, if it didn't go viral.
85
00:14:37.776 --> 00:14:45.996
Um, on TikTok, 30,000 views, and if it's about quite a niche topic where I'm inviting people to say, "Hey, I'm working on this.
86
00:14:46.076 --> 00:15:00.416
I'd love to talk to people who have a relevant experience they'd be happy sharing," that can deliver me so many DMs even though it only has 30,000 views. Um, and in that respect, that's very useful to me.
87
00:15:00.456 --> 00:15:07.636
So it really differentiates for me, um, what a useful or, or good TikTok can be.
88
00:15:08.496 --> 00:15:24.856
So in terms of, like, approaching news then and as a journalist that predominantly uses or likes to use social platforms, is the process for those of s- who are uninitiated with the, the, the world of creating a news story for the BBC or any of these news publishers, is there a quite different approach to it?
89
00:15:24.936 --> 00:15:38.916
Um, what, the i- coming up with the idea, developing the idea, producing it for, for, for use on whatever platform, if you know from the outset that this is, you know, one that you can see or aiming it to be a successful piece that is geared towards, say, TikTok.
90
00:15:39.366 --> 00:15:47.276
I- is there a difference in the approach? And if so, could you s- help us understand how, you know, how you approach it differently? What things do you consider, um, when you're, when you're go through the process?
91
00:15:48.276 --> 00:15:54.436
That's a really good question. Um, there are different things that you could do.
92
00:15:54.686 --> 00:16:07.776
If you've noticed that there's a particular topic that loads of people on TikTok seem really invested in and are talking about, it, it, that it seems smart to think, oh, well, they're talking about it in this way.
93
00:16:07.816 --> 00:16:19.226
However, they haven't covered this part of the conversation. Um, and perhaps they haven't covered this part of the conversation because they haven't been able to directly speak to an expert, for example. Mm.
94
00:16:19.256 --> 00:16:29.536
So your additional value that you can provide, for example, as a public service broadcaster, would be, right, let's, let's bring something into this conversation that they're not already talking about.
95
00:16:29.716 --> 00:16:37.976
But, um, they are hyper-engaged, and they'll appreciate it. It, it will give them some new information and that they're more likely to engage and share it.
96
00:16:38.716 --> 00:16:48.296
Um, one example is I made a video about forced marriage and that, that used a TikTok, uh, creator who had gone viral on the platform.
97
00:16:49.036 --> 00:16:58.236
Um, and he still isn't a massive creator on there or anything, but there will be people who remember his video because it was so moving. Mm.
98
00:16:58.396 --> 00:17:06.656
Um, so including him as, as the author of the film, again, um, drove some engagement. Um,
99
00:17:08.356 --> 00:17:17.396
really I would suggest, 'cause most people won't necessarily be able to spend the time to look on TikTok for case studies and contributors, um,
100
00:17:19.336 --> 00:17:27.786
it is smart to spend time on there and at least see simply what people are talking about. And then very quickly you'll start to see, ah, they're really interested in this.
101
00:17:28.436 --> 00:17:36.096
And if you're thinking, oh, well, I wanna do a report on this, but no one's talking about it on there, chances are it's because younger audiences aren't that interested in it.
102
00:17:36.736 --> 00:17:41.836
Um, or maybe it's simply never been served to them in a way that's actually relevant to their lives.
103
00:17:42.696 --> 00:17:49.376
'Cause one of the challenges that the news publishers face at the moment, or you hear a lot talked about, is, is reaching younger audiences.
104
00:17:49.416 --> 00:18:05.216
And you look at the Reuters digital news reports and you see, um, lots of coverage, uh, in, in the world of journalism about how do you reach that, you know, these younger audiences who are heavy, heavy or heavier users of social platforms who are disenfranchised, disengaged in, in news media.
105
00:18:05.616 --> 00:18:09.676
Uh, and we're gonna talk about some of the possible reasons for that later on. I've got a couple of questions I wanted to ask you.
106
00:18:09.756 --> 00:18:16.396
But, you know, um, what, you know, what sort of things do tend to work well s- on, on platforms?
107
00:18:16.436 --> 00:18:22.996
Is, is it easier saying, well, if it's TikTok, then stories that are about A, B, C, D, they're, they're gonna reach people, younger audiences there really easily.
108
00:18:23.036 --> 00:18:32.156
But topics like this isn't, they're not gonna work so much. Is it, is it as clear cut as that? Or is it more about just the style and it doesn't matter about what the story's about, it's the way that you deliver it?
109
00:18:32.876 --> 00:18:39.336
I was gonna say, I don't think it's to do with topics, to be honest. Mm-hmm. I think it's far more style-wise.
110
00:18:39.516 --> 00:19:03.676
Um, I, I do genuinely believe there is something in every topic to make it interesting to younger audiences, and if not, you know, all younger audiences, at least a niche within younger audiences who, who are only gonna encounter that cont- content on their social media platform because they're not interested in consuming your n- you know, they don't go to your website, they don't buy your paper, th- they don't listen to your radio station.
111
00:19:03.716 --> 00:19:10.805
Like, they're not gonna find it that way. So the only way it's gonna get to them is on a social media platform. Um, style-wise,
112
00:19:11.796 --> 00:19:23.016
we do know that people, uh, uh, from that digital news report, we know that Twitter is realistically the only app that people go to for mainstream news content. Mm.
113
00:19:23.096 --> 00:19:28.256
For other platforms, for, for YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, they go for personalities.
114
00:19:28.936 --> 00:19:43.036
Um, and if you look at a number of the, I'd, I'd say sort of a couple of on TikTok, like leading news creators, they, they do have personality. Th- they are, their face has become their brand attribution.
115
00:19:43.496 --> 00:19:50.316
Um, you see their face and you know you're gonna learn something new. Mm. And that's taken a lot of time for them to build.
116
00:19:50.836 --> 00:20:05.656
And obviously you may, just like if, if you, just like if you loved a morning news program on TV, y- you can love the program without loving every single story they do, but generally you probably, y- you're engaged in most of them.
117
00:20:05.916 --> 00:20:16.176
The, or, you know, half of them. It's, it's exactly the same thing with, for example, news accounts on, on Instagram and TikTok. Um, you know you're gonna learn something new.
118
00:20:16.436 --> 00:20:24.076
Every now and again you're like, "Ah, nah, that doesn't interest me." But most of the time you are invested in listening to these people. And
119
00:20:24.976 --> 00:20:36.276
if you take the example of TikTok, mainstream journalists are not occupying the space. Uh, they aren't going in there and being personalities. I see a bit of it on Instagram.
120
00:20:36.356 --> 00:20:46.296
Um, for some reason Instagram seems more natural for a lot of us to go on rather than TikTok. Um, y- you even don't necessarily many on YouTube either.
121
00:20:46.836 --> 00:21:02.636
Twitter is the easiest, uh, possibly because, you know, it's text-based and you can, um, push out a few tweets during a busy working day. Can you push out a TikTok? You c- you can if you have a skillset, e.g.
122
00:21:02.916 --> 00:21:14.256
you're a video journalist and you, you are equipped to pump these things out very quickly. But if you're not, it really, I think it does feel like an awful lot of effort. What does your social media toolkit contain?
123
00:21:14.296 --> 00:21:25.816
I'm thinking software, hardware. Is it literally just your phone or do you have special microphones and things, special software? What do you use? So I have been thinking that I might amp up what I have.
124
00:21:26.516 --> 00:21:35.356
Um, but up until now, I mean, even to make my TikToks, it's incredibly low production and it literally is just my phone. Um- Mm-hmm...
125
00:21:35.366 --> 00:21:50.086
and s- I mean, sometimes I'll also use my AirPods, but otherwise I don't, I don't even have a sort of a microphone. I may get one though. Um, I'm kind of hoping to make a bit of a better jazzier setup, um- Yeah...
126
00:21:50.196 --> 00:22:00.796
which I'll do over the next couple of months. Um, other than that, obviously I have my laptop. Um, for work I have a camera. I have a Canon 5D. That's what I shoot everything on.
127
00:22:01.176 --> 00:22:18.216
Um, and for my radio, I record with an H5 Zoom. And when I, because everything I do generally is very multimedia, so if I'm making radio I'm also making video, uh, and possibly also doing text as well.
128
00:22:18.396 --> 00:22:31.736
So I need to make sure that my audio quality, if I'm filming, is good enough for radio. So I generally record my audio externally on the Zoom, um, and then I will sync up the audio in the edit with my video.
129
00:22:31.766 --> 00:22:41.285
And I use Final Cut Pro and that's, uh, mainly because that's what I have to use as a BBC journalist because Final Cut Pro is where all our templates live that we use- Right...
130
00:22:41.505 --> 00:22:48.796
to edit video and make them all look, um, in BBC style. So other than that, I'm trying to think. Those are the main tools I use.
131
00:22:48.876 --> 00:22:57.336
I'm guessing Tweet, I'm guessing things like TweetDeck and stuff like that as, are just a standard. But did you use any other publishing tools or was that all really dictated by what the publisher you work for uses, i.e.
132
00:22:57.556 --> 00:23:07.166
BBC for you is using whatever tools you have to, you kind of follow that lead, I guess? Yeah, exactly. Um, I do, I do use tools for my journalism. Mm.
133
00:23:07.296 --> 00:23:16.876
Um, I do use, I found a really good tool the other day where I could analyze, uh, user profiles on Reddit. Um, and I did that. This was for my book. So I did that.
134
00:23:17.036 --> 00:23:32.316
I gathered a sample of users from a particular subreddit and looked at what other subreddits they, um, they were in to see if I could find any kind of connection, um, or similar interests. Uh, what other tools?
135
00:23:33.156 --> 00:23:42.776
There are, um, what's it called? W- is it called what does the public, ask the public? I really like that tool. Ooh Um- Don't, never known that one. I'll have to look one up...
136
00:23:42.836 --> 00:23:59.136
Google Ngrams, um, Google Trends, they're things I use sometimes just to get a, to sort of litmus test whether something's interesting or, or a trend that's changing. Yeah. They're the kind of things that I may use. Um,
137
00:24:00.776 --> 00:24:13.636
otherwise trying to think if there's anything else that I use. In terms of like third party tools to analyze how my content's done, um, I don't really have access- Mm... to anything like that. Not for my personal stuff.
138
00:24:14.256 --> 00:24:26.346
Yeah. Um, I just u- I literally just use the in-platform analytics. Got you. Brilliant. Martin. Yeah. Um, shifting gear a little bit. Um, we notice you're on TikTok's Creator Council. Yeah.
139
00:24:26.476 --> 00:24:35.746
Um, just wonder what that is and, uh, what does it involve and how did you get involved with it? So it sounds very impressive, doesn't it? [laughs] It does.
140
00:24:35.746 --> 00:24:46.016
Sounds like a, a table of creators who govern all from a big table somewhere in the sky or something. I, uh, yeah. I, I mean, I was, I didn't apply for it or anything.
141
00:24:46.176 --> 00:24:59.212
I just got an email one day saying, "We'd love you to join it." And- What I do is very, very small and not impressive, even though it sounds very impressive, and it's literally, um, about, I think, uh, it's, it's this...
142
00:24:59.292 --> 00:25:10.072
I, I'm pretty sure it's a six-month post that I'm probably nearing the end of. But all it is, is they, um, as creators, we can just simply offer our user experience.
143
00:25:10.432 --> 00:25:20.692
Um, and it's a space for us to ask for changes if we'd like them. Um, it's a space for TikTok to say, "Hey, we launched this new feature a month ago. Have you used it? Do you like it?"
144
00:25:21.432 --> 00:25:33.262
Um, it's basically just a chinwag, um- [laughs]... using, I guess, some of our creator expertise. And th- the Creators Council that I'm sitting in, I am by far the least, uh, popular.
145
00:25:33.532 --> 00:25:42.552
I think I probably have the lowest following amongst all of them. Um, but we all do come from really different niches within, within the creative space, which is what I think is quite interesting about being in it.
146
00:25:43.212 --> 00:25:56.652
Um, but yeah, I did get to speak at a TikTok festival in London about a month ago, and I got to meet some of them in real life, which was really nice. Um, because otherwise I don't meet creators day to day.
147
00:25:56.772 --> 00:26:00.052
I do not work with other creators in that sense.
148
00:26:00.092 --> 00:26:17.252
Of course, everyone I work with is a creator because I think j- journalists are creators, but, um, I don't necessarily surround myself with, uh, creators whose lives are completely on these platforms, and I feel like I'm in a weird limbo between the two.
149
00:26:17.932 --> 00:26:28.442
Um, so it was really interesting to actually meet some people as well. You just talked about, there, about features and things. Is there, is there any particular features that you, um, have come across that are lacking?
150
00:26:28.472 --> 00:26:35.872
Things that you think, "Why have they not got this on, on TikTok or in other platforms", particularly around the work you do, uh, uh, in journalism.
151
00:26:36.012 --> 00:26:45.672
Is there, is there some obvious ones that you've already shouted about to, to the people at TikTok? Um, I'm trying to think. All I'm desperate for at the moment, I want, um...
152
00:26:46.202 --> 00:26:54.142
And they will roll out for us, they just haven't yet, because in the US they already have. But, um, automatic captions. Yeah, yeah.
153
00:26:54.172 --> 00:27:01.372
I have to spend quite a lot of time editing my captions to make sure that they are, my videos are more accessible. Um,
154
00:27:02.472 --> 00:27:11.572
and that's not only for people who may have, I don't know, special educational needs, but additionally I have so many people who follow my content for whom English is not their first language.
155
00:27:11.692 --> 00:27:19.962
So having my captions on there is really, really helpful. Um, just like if I was following, like, a Spanish influencer, it, it would help me as well. Mm.
156
00:27:20.132 --> 00:27:28.472
Um, so I just, I'd love them to introduce that so I can spend less time, and that will make, uh, making TikToks take up even less of my time.
157
00:27:29.412 --> 00:27:40.492
So moving away slightly from TikTok, um, but the, some of the questions that, uh, people have asked me who work in journalism are, are, I think, are questions related to newer platforms or newer t- uh, newer sort of formats.
158
00:27:40.532 --> 00:27:48.852
And one of the ones that's been talked about a lot in the last, uh, 6 to 12 months is, is audio, and we're talking on one of them right now with Twitter Spaces- Yeah... and Clubhouse.
159
00:27:49.292 --> 00:28:02.352
Um, and there are, you know, newsletters have had a, a resur- a, you know, resurgence of interest in it, and there, there, there's probably a few others that we could think about that are somewhat flavor of the month at the moment for, for use of, for people consuming content, whether it's news or otherwise.
160
00:28:02.412 --> 00:28:09.702
Um, are these ones that you, uh, ex- excite you? Do you see them as opportunities for journalists that are, are un- as, as yet untapped?
161
00:28:09.772 --> 00:28:20.772
Because at the moment, you know, it's still very early on for, for the likes of Clubhouse and Twitter Spaces, but to me it seems like quite an obvious and, uh, good thing for, for them to tr- try out for, for different formats for, for content.
162
00:28:20.792 --> 00:28:31.212
What, what, what have you made of all of these things that have come out recently? Yeah. I think, um, the minute I am le- I am more time rich, 'cause at the moment I'm so time poor with my book. Mm.
163
00:28:31.252 --> 00:28:40.232
But the minute my book, uh, takes up less of my day to day, um, I got so obsessed with Clubhouse when it did first launch.
164
00:28:40.812 --> 00:28:53.252
Um, and you could see in the terms of, like, battery usage on my phone, the amount of time I was spending on Clubhouse really, really shot up. It was impacting on my Netflix time. Mm. It was impacting on my TikTok time.
165
00:28:53.952 --> 00:29:09.252
Um, and that's because a lot of the Clubhouse chats were just really juicy conversations, and they were talking about really important things that, I think, had I tried to make an appointment to listen to them, I would've forgotten about them, or something else in my life would've taken priority.
166
00:29:09.652 --> 00:29:18.271
But it's the fact that I'd get a notification that an interesting chat is happening, and I would just turn it on, um, and have it on in the background, just like radio.
167
00:29:18.292 --> 00:29:29.932
[laughs] Um, but radio doesn't necessarily notify me that there's an interesting chat happening, whereas Clubhouse does. Therefore, I'm more likely, my smartphone habits mean I'm more likely to tap into it.
168
00:29:30.692 --> 00:29:39.632
Um, I don't know if it's still as compelling, 'cause I think I see less people in my social circles talking about Clubhouse now. Yeah. But, um, I would, will go back in there.
169
00:29:39.712 --> 00:29:52.422
And there is an example in the book where I was on, I was listening to a Clubhouse chat, and I did hear, like, really wild health misinformation. And because the Clubhouse chat was a very much, um,
170
00:29:53.472 --> 00:30:04.282
self-confirming space, it, it was a space where everyone was very like-minded. No one in there was gonna pipe up- Mm... and challenge what had been said. Everyone was just gonna absorb it as, as truth.
171
00:30:04.932 --> 00:30:15.512
Uh, so I think there's probably a lot on Clubhouse that is worth examining. I see so much, um, there's so much finance chat on there and entrepreneurialism chat. There must be finance scams happening.
172
00:30:15.912 --> 00:30:17.992
I just, I haven't looked on there, but there must be.
173
00:30:18.572 --> 00:30:27.872
Do you think that there'd be, the, the, these audio platforms could be used in a way where there's, like, a big s- like, long-running story such as, I don't know, COVID's maybe not the best example from what I'm thinking of.
174
00:30:27.912 --> 00:30:34.352
But certainly a story that is in, in the news cycle frequently and it hasn't got a distinct end date, k- so it's rolling news.
175
00:30:34.792 --> 00:30:44.472
Um, where journalists will find ways to use audio as a way of jumping in, bringing people that are involved in the story, getting it, making it happen live, and just having those live discussions.
176
00:30:44.492 --> 00:30:59.252
Do you see that as a way that audio could be used in, in the news production or in f- for some of these news companies, or, or is it something that you just don't think is gonna be whetting the appetites of people, or it's too tricky to organize, or it doesn't make sense with all the other things that a journalist might have to do?
177
00:30:59.322 --> 00:31:09.583
'Cause to me it seems like a, an obvious thing that they might try and do as a journalist. I don't know. I would counter that and say, why does the company have to do it? Mm. Why can't individual journalists do it?
178
00:31:10.384 --> 00:31:20.544
Um, I think the minute the, the company does it, um, I don't know if that is in line with these personality trends that we're seeing.
179
00:31:21.904 --> 00:31:26.724
Well, then that leads, uh, neatly into a, into a, a relevant question, and that's the question around creators.
180
00:31:26.804 --> 00:31:36.844
Because one of the things that has changed over the last 12 months, um, sig- significantly is this role of the creator, the buzzword creator economy, and then all these monetization tools.
181
00:31:37.184 --> 00:31:43.524
And then we've seen a lot of journalists, or at least a number of journalists, jump into a kind of inde- more of an independent role.
182
00:31:43.564 --> 00:31:49.784
So they've got their own Substack, they've got their own kind of paid-for community they've developed, and their own personal brand, you know.
183
00:31:50.144 --> 00:32:03.644
I would say someone like Taylor Lorenz shares a lot of the similarities in many ways with the things that you do, you know, in terms of works in journalism, is very much a heavy user of social, you know, is big o- and, and into TikTok and in that kind of w- that whole environment.
184
00:32:03.654 --> 00:32:13.124
Um, but that, that, that causes quite a lot of friction, I would imagine, with, with between the journalist and the, the employer who's giving them the, the, you know, opportunity to, to write for them, whatever.
185
00:32:13.544 --> 00:32:22.594
Um, do, do you see that as a big shift, or do you think this is just a small thing that can run neatly alongside people's jobs whilst working for a BBC or a, a New York Times?
186
00:32:22.624 --> 00:32:32.794
Or do you think there is, there's friction that's gonna continue to cause trouble there for people who wanna create a personal brand like the, your own personal brand versus that of, of BBC or whoever you work for? It...
187
00:32:32.864 --> 00:32:38.264
Just I'd be interested to get your views on, on that shift in, in the way that people operate now as in that space. Yeah.
188
00:32:38.544 --> 00:32:54.044
I would instinctively see this new space as really good news for freelancers and people with multi-hyphenate careers, um, who pe- perhaps work for some of these major outlets, but not necessarily full time.
189
00:32:54.624 --> 00:32:58.524
Um, that's where I see some of these spaces being most useful.
190
00:32:59.064 --> 00:33:09.524
It is inevitable obviously that if you work for a major out- outlet, and you work for them full time, and all of your content is gonna be kind of associated with them, it, it, it makes sense.
191
00:33:09.554 --> 00:33:15.564
And it's, in many cases, you know, it's right that there is some, um, you know, you need to have some boundaries.
192
00:33:16.124 --> 00:33:32.584
But I, I, I j- I think it offers so many opportunities for people who aren't journalists, um, and who don't come from the places that do traditionally get all the power and access to use these tools and be heard.
193
00:33:32.844 --> 00:33:41.014
That's what's so exciting about it, and that's not a new conversation. I remember when I first entered journalism, people were talking about citizen journalism.
194
00:33:41.844 --> 00:33:56.304
Um, and that's something that's been around that's far predated social media. Um, so yeah, it's, it, I- it is a tricky one, but just because there's friction doesn't mean that you can't innovate. Yeah.
195
00:33:56.404 --> 00:34:21.304
I think, uh, it certainly seems like some of the f- forward thinking, maybe that's the politest way, nicest way of sort of framing it, uh, publishers are trying to find working relationships or working models that allow for the independence of the writer to create a, a brand for themself, which in- inevitably will generate, you know, more page views, more listeners, more views, whatever it is that they're hoping to gain from having, you know, this person write for them or, or present for them.
196
00:34:21.404 --> 00:34:28.404
Um, building the... helping them build a brand around that i- i- 'cause personalities are what sells news more than, than the many other things these days.
197
00:34:28.484 --> 00:34:45.304
So, uh, to me, it makes sense, but I, but I can certainly see some of the sort of legacy publishers struggling with the, the concept of having, uh, someone who's got their own brand and, and maybe monetizing it and finding a way to make a, a side hustle alongside their job as a paid-for employed member of, of the, of the journalist team.
198
00:34:45.364 --> 00:34:52.353
But, but, um, but Martyn, there were some other topics we were gonna pick up as well, 'cause I know we're conscious that we've been speaking for like 10 or 15 minutes into the second stamina list- Yeah...
199
00:34:52.364 --> 00:35:03.764
and I don't wanna keep Sophia longer than maybe she, she needs to. So w- what else have we got on the list? Yeah. Yeah. So we, um, are in the age of misinformation and fake news and, and all of that.
200
00:35:03.804 --> 00:35:10.644
And, uh, you k- joined the BBC while that had already kinda kicked off with the election of, uh, Donald Trump.
201
00:35:11.224 --> 00:35:21.674
And, uh, so you've maybe got a different perspective on this than someone who's maybe been in journalism for years and looks at this and goes, "Ah, uh, we've lost all trust of our audience," and, and, and that kind of thing.
202
00:35:21.734 --> 00:35:41.984
So I just wonder what your perspective is on keeping audience trust, especially when you look at social media and you look at, uh, even the, um, the BBC's misinformation reporter, uh, just gets a load of abuse about, uh, how, um, you know, how, how what they're saying is misinformation even though they're reporting on misinformation.
203
00:35:42.404 --> 00:35:57.824
So it's a complex minefield. And, uh, how do you approach that? Um, it's tricky because it, I, I don't gen- I am not someone who generally faces much online abuse.
204
00:35:58.504 --> 00:36:10.324
Um, and I don't generally... I'm also not actually employed to be a reporter. Yeah. So I'm not a news reporter technically. All the news reporting I do has been outside the remit of my role.
205
00:36:11.124 --> 00:36:23.304
Um, but certainly in the times when I have done reports, um, if, if someone does message something that's a bit nasty, I always counter it with kindness and more information.
206
00:36:23.924 --> 00:36:35.204
Um, I don't believe in kind of being snide and mean, and, "How can you think that? That's stupid." [laughs] Like, that would never be me. Um, and I have always, with my videos,
207
00:36:36.154 --> 00:36:42.564
um, that I've made for Heart N Soul, um, after I've published the videos, I do spend time in the comment sections.
208
00:36:42.624 --> 00:36:55.724
And if I see people sharing things that are just really, really wrong and inaccurate about a faith group, I will reply. I will say, "Hello. I made this video. Actually, blah, blah, blah, blah." Mm. Um, "Have a nice day."
209
00:36:56.104 --> 00:37:06.304
[laughs] Uh, again, I, I don't wanna ever be seen as being... It's not only about being seen as mean. I don't wanna be seen as patronizing as well. Um, because often-
210
00:37:07.384 --> 00:37:19.944
I, that's not how you're gonna persuade someone into, um, reading your fact, uh, and, you know, absorbing it and hopefully not sharing misinformation again. But I would say
211
00:37:20.844 --> 00:37:26.844
what I try to do, and very much part of why I am on TikTok, is that people get to know me
212
00:37:27.764 --> 00:37:42.104
and they have a direct r- they feel like they have a direct relationship with me, and that, for example, if something really, um, bad or, or simply mad happened in their lives, they would feel like they could tell me about it.
213
00:37:42.864 --> 00:37:48.264
Um, and while that's not necessarily about countering misinformation, that is about building trust.
214
00:37:48.544 --> 00:37:54.344
I think we do need to think about building trusting relationships that aren't necessarily about countering misinformation.
215
00:37:54.864 --> 00:38:10.664
Building trust is also how we, we tell better stories, full stop, because more people will talk to us, more people will, um, be happy sharing something with us, and they're not, and they're gonna know that, um, in speaking to us, we also, you know, protect them in some way.
216
00:38:10.744 --> 00:38:20.084
We aren't gonna take advantage. Um, so for me, trust, uh, is actually more about that than it is about, um, explicit countering misinformation.
217
00:38:20.124 --> 00:38:33.564
However, in, in my future career and changing job roles, that might change, and I may see that challenge as actually, um, taking up more of my time. But for now, it's more about simply connecting with people. Yeah.
218
00:38:33.574 --> 00:38:56.604
Um, one, one of the other areas of concern that we were just gonna pick up on before we wrap things up today is, and this discussion around the topic that comes up every time you speak about Facebook or TikTok and Twitter and social media, and that's its role, uh, its somewhat negative, uh, role it plays in society and, and the dangers it presents particularly to young and vulnerable users and what their level of responsibility is as a, as a company.
219
00:38:56.764 --> 00:39:10.104
But also how much actually should we be laying at the door of, of a Facebook or a TikTok in terms of the concerns we have around polarization and many other, these other topics we've sort of touched on, uh, in the last 20 minutes or so.
220
00:39:10.124 --> 00:39:17.864
But you, you know, you operate in this space as, as, as much as any journalist does, and also, uh, I'm sure have a view on, on these platforms.
221
00:39:17.904 --> 00:39:26.144
I just wonder what your take is on, on kind of the real and present danger these platforms present to, to, certainly to younger audiences.
222
00:39:26.344 --> 00:39:35.104
Um, and also how much responsibility do you think they have as, as companies versus maybe parents and teachers have versus governments and regulators.
223
00:39:35.424 --> 00:39:43.524
So just wanted to get your spin on, on that, having been in this space for some time and, and, and reported on it, I guess. Um, I, I...
224
00:39:43.804 --> 00:39:51.244
This is a very, uh, impartial answer, but [laughs] I think everyone could be doing a bit better. That is what I think. That's my honest opinion.
225
00:39:51.744 --> 00:40:05.024
Everyone from, from the people with the highest and greatest amounts of power to Joe Bloggs who sees a nasty comment online, um, and doesn't bother reporting it when they could be reporting it. Um,
226
00:40:06.444 --> 00:40:19.324
it, in my, I can s- personally, I can sp- speak from, um, the more I've reported on all of this, the more I've become an active... B- I don't know if this is the right way to describe it, but, like, a,
227
00:40:20.564 --> 00:40:29.084
a, a bystander, but an active bystander. So if I do see a nasty comment online, it's irrelevant that it wasn't directed at me, I still report it.
228
00:40:29.184 --> 00:40:34.304
Um, I don't know if people get taught at school, at, you know, at schools now that that should be something that you do.
229
00:40:34.784 --> 00:40:48.824
I think we talk a lot about reporting abuse, like report abuse directed at you, and it's like, yes, we do need to do that, but we also need to make sure that other people, um, are happy and healthy as well.
230
00:40:49.884 --> 00:40:58.064
Um, so I think everyone. Do you think we're expecting too much of them? Everyone is people. Do you think it, do you think the media criticizes social media platforms too much?
231
00:40:58.133 --> 00:41:11.844
And do you think that we as a society or as a, um, or as individuals are expecting or have unrealistic expectations of what can be done in terms of the issues such as, you know, trolling and, and abuse of people and harassment and things like that?
232
00:41:12.124 --> 00:41:23.784
Yeah. Uh, what, what's your take on that? I 100% agree with that because I think that obviously the things that are gonna make news stories are often negative.
233
00:41:24.763 --> 00:41:45.564
Um, and even if I look at my own life, the role that the internet has played in making parts of my life so much better, my health, my relationships, my access and knowledge about my own human rights, um, I have gained from the internet.
234
00:41:45.744 --> 00:42:03.284
Connectivity, meeting people, uh, learning languages, all of these things have been infinitely improved by being able to find community online in a way that I can't find in my physical life, or I can find it in my physical life, but to a limit.
235
00:42:04.044 --> 00:42:18.124
Um, and there's only so much time in the day, especially for me, and the internet really helps me max out my life as much as I possibly can. Um, I really grew up with the internet.
236
00:42:18.504 --> 00:42:27.984
I can remember my earliest friendships and relationships really being informed and shadowed by the internet. And
237
00:42:29.204 --> 00:42:42.164
as much badness as it causes, my life has really been infinitely improved by all the wonderful connections that I have been able to make. Um, I would not, I possibly wouldn't even be a journalist without it.
238
00:42:42.784 --> 00:42:50.524
Um, and I wouldn't be the journalist that I am without it either. That's such an optimistic, uh, kind of- It is. It really is... orsun- I, I like it.
239
00:42:50.944 --> 00:43:01.684
[laughs] Because that, that's the kind of attitude people had to the internet, uh, and to social media 10 years ago, and we've lost that, and it's great to see that people, even though we don't hear it shared that much, that pe- some people still think that.
240
00:43:01.804 --> 00:43:03.974
That's, that's great to hear. Absolutely. It does.
241
00:43:03.974 --> 00:43:14.544
And actually, uh, as we're wrapping some of these bits and pieces up, because I've, um, I think we've got like a couple of minutes and I'm gonna let, uh, Sophia have the rest of her day to herself, is, you know, what, who are the people that you, you, excite you online at the moment?
242
00:43:14.704 --> 00:43:23.784
You know, com- uh, and whether it's because they're doing amazing journalisticy things, they're just incredible creators, or they're people that are telling really important stories.
243
00:43:23.884 --> 00:43:30.784
You, you're in and around this stuff all day long, so you'll be as good as anyone to, to tell us who, who should be inspiring us or who is inspiring you. Who, who should we look for?
244
00:43:31.496 --> 00:43:37.436
I mean, you compared me to Taylor earlier, and I died because I'm in love with Taylor. I just think her journalism is amazing. She is great. She's pretty awesome.
245
00:43:37.456 --> 00:43:51.176
Um, but from, from a journalistic perspective, she is who I aspire, uh, to be more like. Um, if I speak about creators, I mean, my For You page on TikTok, because I look for content that informs me- Mm-hmm...
246
00:43:51.186 --> 00:43:52.636
um, I get fed it, which is very nice.
247
00:43:53.156 --> 00:44:05.276
So, um, there's a great creator on there called Benji who talks a lot about, um, systemic racial injustice and, and the h- how to meet it and compute it in day-to-day life that I've really benefited from.
248
00:44:05.316 --> 00:44:15.976
He's an excellent example of, um, TikTok style, uh, and how that can work well. Um, gosh, who else? Um- What about also about publishers?
249
00:44:16.016 --> 00:44:27.506
For, for those who, who are kind of like maybe fed up with kind of following one particular news publisher and they're not getting that kind of the source, source, the, the quality of the news that they want or want a different take and a different spin on it, are there other...
250
00:44:27.876 --> 00:44:30.606
We, we'll assume that you think BBC is the best thing ever- [laughs]...
251
00:44:30.616 --> 00:44:40.116
but aside from BBC, can you tell us sort of some of, some of the, um, publishers that you follow or maybe some of the journalists that, other than Taylor of course, that you, you find quite good on, on these platforms at the moment?
252
00:44:41.836 --> 00:44:57.075
Hmm. Gotta be honest, I get most of my news from social media. I do not follow publishers. Um, I- if I wasn't a journalist, I'd be a massive news avoider. Really? I, I am really a person of my generation.
253
00:44:57.216 --> 00:45:02.596
I, I probably wouldn't see a lot of it. Um, I subscribe to The New York Times.
254
00:45:02.796 --> 00:45:11.126
Would you say, do you think that's actually, uh, uh, something that is a generational thing then, in the sense that m- me, I'm, I'm a little bit older than you, not much, a little bit [laughs]
255
00:45:11.126 --> 00:45:18.736
But I certainly, you know, will d- gravitate to certain news publishers, and increasingly now in the last few years, individual writers and reporters as well.
256
00:45:19.166 --> 00:45:23.776
Um, and so I will think of like Now This or, or an Al Jazeera or a BBC or a Sky whatever.
257
00:45:24.176 --> 00:45:40.736
Um, but it sounds to me as, um, having spoken to yourself and a few other people, uh, in, I guess in your generation of people, that it's more about the, uh, the, the stories and the individuals, and it's, it's the brand of the news and maybe the, the kind of, uh, the thing that overrides it is, is less important.
258
00:45:40.816 --> 00:45:48.396
It's more about individuals. And, and I don't know if that is a generational thing or whether it's a shift in just the way we all consume news. I don't know what your thoughts are on that.
259
00:45:49.216 --> 00:46:00.506
Uh, I do think some of it is generational, 'cause even when I speak to friends of mine who aren't journalists, um, they are kind of semi-religious fanatics of certain podcasts- Mm-hmm...
260
00:46:00.526 --> 00:46:09.936
which I think is a bit like what you're describing as well. I used to be, too, but none of the podcasts that I listened to, again, were newsy. Um, they were always comedians. Um,
261
00:46:12.076 --> 00:46:27.556
I also have a lot of friends who follow YouTubers, and I am increasingly following more YouTubers who, who share interesting content that is newsy. But they're, again, not journalists, but they are filmmakers. Um,
262
00:46:29.436 --> 00:46:42.016
so you could be onto something there. Um, but I, I really don't know how much of it is informed by my job, um, that makes me, you know, not a reflective representative sample. [laughs] Okey-doke.
263
00:46:42.096 --> 00:46:52.156
Well, um, I'm conscious of the time, and so th- uh, maybe you could just quickly tell us a bit about what's coming up for you then, because I know that you're leaving the, uh, the BBC, and you've not quite yet revealed your full plans.
264
00:46:52.196 --> 00:46:55.696
I haven't. But you've also got this book that you're writing, and there's, uh, probably lots of other bits and pieces.
265
00:46:55.776 --> 00:47:05.236
So, so what does take up your time at the moment, or what is it your, your, people, where people can find you and what you're doing? Yeah. So you can, you can find me on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok.
266
00:47:05.276 --> 00:47:11.416
They're the places that I'm most active. Um, the book is taking up most of my time, and that's gonna be out in January.
267
00:47:11.676 --> 00:47:16.726
And it's, uh, published by Harper Collins, called Losing It: Dispelling the Sex Myths that Rule our Lives.
268
00:47:17.406 --> 00:47:40.756
And it's me, um, investigating and debunking lots of the sex myths that have been handed down to us either by, uh, faith or cultural backgrounds or even, um, medical myths, um, that have perpetuated despite studies coming out and, and debunking them, um, which has been thrilling to write and is full of internet culture things.
269
00:47:40.916 --> 00:47:43.516
So- How, how did you-... if you're listening-... decide that?... you'll actually like it. Sorry?
270
00:47:43.536 --> 00:47:50.956
How did you, how did you come to w- and decide that that was something you wanted to write about and it was, uh, substantial enough for you to write about? Where, where did that interest come from? Yeah.
271
00:47:50.996 --> 00:47:59.006
It began as I got approached to write a book, which was very exciting. Um, but that happens to a lot... I've discovered that happens to a lot of people. But then
272
00:47:59.956 --> 00:48:07.616
getting a successful book proposal is not what happens necessarily. Mm-hmm. So I'm really l- fortunate that I had wonderful support from my editor, Grace Pangelli.
273
00:48:08.156 --> 00:48:25.576
But, um, originally it was gonna be a book about virginity, and this idea, it, uh, in my research I came to learn and understand how, wow, actually virgini- virginity is this sort of destructive origin myth that we're first told about sex.
274
00:48:25.616 --> 00:48:33.936
And then as we go through our lives and reach sexual maturity, you sort of learn, actually, what is this all about? I've been fed lots of lies.
275
00:48:34.036 --> 00:48:42.136
Uh, I also don't necessarily have access to an ethical, pleasurable sex life, and it turns out it's because of all the, all these things I've been told that simply aren't true.
276
00:48:42.996 --> 00:49:06.396
Um, so some of it is informed by personal experience, uh, but mainly it's informed by all these interviews that I've been doing around the world with, um, everyone from hymen repair surgeons to pornographers to, uh, a lot of doctors and sex therapists, but mainly normal people just trying to lead happy, normal lives, uh, and sort of being confounded by all this misinformation they've been given.
277
00:49:07.296 --> 00:49:16.156
Um, but yeah, other than that, uh, I'm, I'm sort of tidying those edits up. I'm getting excited for my new role. Um, there'll be news about it soon hopefully.
278
00:49:16.456 --> 00:49:31.056
Um, I am still a reporter, so if you have, if anyone has something that they think they'd love me to cover, um, I'm always here ready to report on new stories, um, and look for new stories ahead of my new job as well.
279
00:49:31.216 --> 00:49:43.566
Um, so it's a lot of change. Hope- I will be TikToking. I'll continue to TikTok and Instagram and Reddit and Discord and maybe try Twitch. It depends how much time I have in the day. Yeah.
280
00:49:43.576 --> 00:49:53.976
But, um, yeah, it's still, it's still [laughs] social media- [laughs] The social media side of my journalism is not gonna stop. If anything, it's gonna get bigger. Thanks to Sophia for taking the time to talk with us.
281
00:49:54.076 --> 00:50:05.896
That was a lot of fun. We'll be back soon with our next interview, when we'll be talking to David Carroll and Carol Cadwalladr from activist group the self-styled Real Facebook Oversight Board. Look out for that soon.
282
00:50:05.916 --> 00:50:11.376
In the meantime, don't forget that you can join the Geekout community by searching for the Social Media Geekout group on Facebook.
283
00:50:11.636 --> 00:50:18.636
And why not subscribe to my Geekout newsletter with all the week's social media news and discussion in your inbox for free every Friday?
284
00:50:19.256 --> 00:50:26.196
Or my newsletter, Tech Revolution, which brings you all of the most important tech news from the week if you want to understand the future.
285
00:50:26.656 --> 00:50:37.356
I make sense of the biggest, most impactful stories to help you understand what's coming next. Links to all of those are in the show notes for this episode. We'll be back soon. But for now, goodbye, geeks.
286
00:50:38.016 --> 00:50:47.176
[outro music]
