Superlongevity, Memory and Identity with Transhumanist Pioneer, Dr Natasha Vita-More #6

WEBVTT
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:21.760
Welcome to the future view.
00:00:22.239 --> 00:00:31.519
So now and again you meet someone who is rather unique and who has done so much and has so much to say that well you have to give over the whole episode to them.
00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:37.359
Usually, as you know, I invite two guests along, but for today's discussion I have invited only one.
00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:40.000
My guest today is Natasha Vitamore.
00:00:40.240 --> 00:00:52.320
Now I could take the 45 minutes just to talk you through her CV because it reads like an historical timeline stretching all the way back to 1983 when she first wrote the Transhumanist Manifesto.
00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:54.399
And she's done quite a lot since.
00:00:54.640 --> 00:01:02.560
Natasha holds a PhD from the University of Plymouth School of Media Arts, Design and Architecture and a Master's in Future Studies from Houston.
00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:10.640
She was a filmmaker in residence at the University of Colorado and has credentials in the world of paralegal, law, nutrition and sports.
00:01:10.879 --> 00:01:16.239
In 2001, Village Voice called her a role model for super longevity.
00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:22.959
And she will no doubt tell us more about her concept of the whole body prototype or whole body prosthetic.
00:01:23.359 --> 00:01:36.959
She's the executive director of Humanity Plus and a professor at the University of Advancing Technology, and she's also the co-editor of the 2012 book, The Transhumanist Reader, and lots more besides.
00:01:37.359 --> 00:01:43.599
The interesting thing is that after all this work and all this innovation, Natasha doesn't feel like stopping.
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:55.760
Indeed, this is one of the central theses of her work: that human life should be less limiting, and we should be achieving a much longer lifespan than the one we currently settle for.
00:01:56.159 --> 00:02:19.199
And so it is in that vein that we have a fascinating discussion about radical life extension, binary thinking that perhaps limits some of our visions and possibilities and potential, the importance of the continuity of the person for identity and whether it's possible to live over different platforms and inhabit different substrates.
00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:31.120
We talk about the growth of AI assistance services that might in the future open up the doorways of perception for us, enhancing our senses, showing us new realities all around us.
00:02:31.280 --> 00:02:45.439
And she tells us a little about her scientific work that involved the reviving of earthworms after they'd been cryonically preserved and how she could demonstrate that there was a continuity of memory in the animal afterwards.
00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:54.560
And we finish up talking about multiple selves in the cybersphere and also what it's like to be a pioneering woman in transhumanism.
00:02:54.719 --> 00:03:01.199
So let's listen in to this episode about longevity, memory, and identity with Natasha Veter Moore.
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:06.879
So welcome Natasha.
00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:09.439
Oh my gosh, it's such a thrill to speak to you.
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:11.439
I've wanted to speak to you for quite some time.
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:15.199
I've followed you and your work for ages and ages.
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:18.800
And I'm thrilled that you've been able to join us today.
00:03:19.280 --> 00:03:20.319
Thank you, Tracy.
00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.800
I am absolutely delighted to be here.
00:03:23.360 --> 00:03:24.000
It's great.
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:28.960
Now, let's get straight into it and talk a little bit about transhumanism.
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:35.360
I don't necessarily want to start with a definition, but I think you will explain it very well to our listeners.
00:03:35.439 --> 00:03:45.039
And I wonder if we could start by thinking about the intersection between transhumanism and the notions of identity, personal identity.
00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:46.800
All right.
00:03:47.039 --> 00:04:10.319
Well, uh, transhumanism started out as a philosophy, a codified philosophy, uh, stems from humanism, has was arrived at around the time of postmodernism, and saw some difficulties with the postmodernist uh rhetoric and aimed to seek beyond a lot of the fear syndrome of during that time.
00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:36.319
And it reached back into historically into looking at the advances of humanity and through the use of technology and science and ethics and the wonderful things that humanity has developed over the years, and toward a more rational, logical way to assess where we are as futurists and looking at the advances that are taking place and some of the concerns we have about the future, the pros and cons.
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:42.879
So it's really a type of rational, sensible, critical thinking and creative visionary thinking philosophy.
00:04:43.199 --> 00:04:59.680
It became a movement in the 1990s and a worldview that is spread throughout the planet and uh is still esteemed as a fundamental philosophy about the future and advances in technology and science.
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:01.279
Yes, exactly.
00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:12.639
And I I often, when I'm reading about transhumanism and looking at, you know, the seminal work on this, it feels to me that it's a lot to do with the removal of limits.
00:05:12.800 --> 00:05:19.439
I don't know if you'd agree, but it could be political or cultural limits or psychological or biological limits.
00:05:19.519 --> 00:05:33.360
And I know you've done a lot of work around, you know, how we get to a longer life where we perhaps remove some of the limits to our current, you know, time span, our current span on this earth.
00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:41.920
Can you tell us a little bit about longevity and the work that you have been doing for, well, some decades now in this area?
00:05:42.800 --> 00:06:00.560
Surely I I want to acknowledge that you have a very strong, insightful sensibility about transhumanism and the and longevity and the desire and the practical applied science and technology of removing limitations.
00:06:00.720 --> 00:06:21.759
And I think we are seeing this today with getting beyond binary thinking, for example, getting beyond biases, getting beyond prejudices and limitations in all ways put on humanity through social dictums, through political type of hegemony, through corporate structures, through a type of vying for position and social media.
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:30.560
I mean, all these things are a reminder of our limits, that we need to use social media so much to have followers, for example.
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:34.240
It's one day we'll look back at that and go, what the heck were we thinking?
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:41.360
But in regards to longevity, I think that is applicable and looking, you know, theoretically and practice-based longevity.
00:06:41.759 --> 00:06:51.439
And there's a very strong link between the transhumanist agenda of seeking beyond limits of disease and suffering and uh you know anguish.
00:06:51.759 --> 00:06:54.639
Why live a life full of anguish and disease?
00:06:54.800 --> 00:07:04.560
Why not try to be as healthy and focused on possible futures and positive ways to overcome odds and help each other in this way?
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:07.040
So I think that's core to transhumanism.
00:07:07.279 --> 00:07:17.120
You asked about longevity, and I really am so glad you didn't say immortality because the the term immortality does have a heck of a lot of baggage over the years.
00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:22.480
Immortality is a pipe dream, it's it's a it's an improbability and possibility.
00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:25.279
Nothing in the universe is immortal.
00:07:25.439 --> 00:07:31.680
So to aim for immortality would be a little bit foolish for a focused sensibility.
00:07:31.920 --> 00:07:36.240
Longevity, on the other hand, offers all sorts of possibilities.
00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:52.959
I think it's really important to mention here that longevity refers to living healthy lives within the range of human life expectancy, which currently is a maximum of around an approximate 123 years.
00:07:53.519 --> 00:08:08.800
Alternatively, super longevity, radical longevity, or extreme life extension refers to expanding the current maximum lifespan well beyond that given shelf life of 123 years in good health.
00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:11.199
Not in poor health, but in good health.
00:08:11.600 --> 00:08:14.399
And I think you wanted to ask me how long life should be is.
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:24.720
I was going to ask you that because I know that um, well, actually, we get on to that, that um it must be 20 years ago that you were referred to as a role model for super longevity.
00:08:24.959 --> 00:08:28.639
And I am going to ask you, what have we been doing for the last 20 years?
00:08:28.959 --> 00:08:35.279
Um But yes, if if we're not immortal, then you know, what is a long life?
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:51.840
Uh yeah, it's um a long life is living as long as possible in good health, as long as the cells are functioning, as long as the body is is cooperating with its systems and the brain is functioning.
00:08:52.399 --> 00:08:54.240
So that is life.
00:08:54.480 --> 00:08:56.720
You know, that's what the aim is for.
00:08:56.879 --> 00:09:00.159
And you mentioned uh role model for super longevity, yes.
00:09:00.559 --> 00:09:28.559
It's interesting that over 20 years I can't see that a lot has happened in regards to the expanding of humanities and with the Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence or narrow AI looking at general intelligence or AGI looking at nanotechnology, looking at the you know, the virtual worlds and computational theories, and it's just the space exploration, all these things have really advanced.
00:09:28.799 --> 00:09:32.879
However, we still have a maximum lifespan of 123 years.
00:09:32.960 --> 00:09:42.879
So over the the 20 years since that quote about me, my work has taken some shifts and turns and uh advances.
00:09:43.120 --> 00:10:01.519
But in the field of longevity, we have really good therapies that are band-aids that are helping to keep us alive and maybe give us good life, but we haven't had major advances in the industry of life extension or longevity.
00:10:01.679 --> 00:10:03.759
And that's something we're going to get to.
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:11.279
I don't know how long life should be, but I I do have a view on how long life could be.
00:10:11.679 --> 00:10:17.279
And since life is a process of functions, it depends on how well we function.
00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:23.759
And life lasts actually as long as the capacity of these functions cooperate.
00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:26.240
And different life forms have different lifespans.
00:10:26.399 --> 00:10:39.840
I think this is important to consider because, I mean, for example, take a look at the great uh basin Bristol cone pine trees has lived up to and maybe longer than 4,845 years.
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:40.320
Whoa.
00:10:40.559 --> 00:10:41.840
I mean, think about that.
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:47.679
A tree has life, it has its process, it goes through from a seed to an elder.
00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:49.600
But 4,000 years, wow.
00:10:49.679 --> 00:10:52.399
So a tree's not that long, we don't question it, we accept it.
00:10:52.559 --> 00:10:58.480
The bowhead whale, and I think it's the giant tortoise, the one I'm thinking of weighs 800 pounds.
00:10:58.639 --> 00:11:05.919
Well, both of these two beings can live well beyond 200 years and even double that.
00:11:06.320 --> 00:11:22.000
And if we look at you know, sea life in their environments, the hydra, simple water fresh organism, never dies, and the uh sea anatomy never dies, and a lobster does not experience metabolic changes that cause aging.
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:28.480
So we accept these other life forms living different types of lifespans.
00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:40.720
So we ought to hopefully remove the biases on life extension that humans are only supposed to live a certain number of years, and that's long enough we need to die and pass on our genes to our offspring.
00:11:40.879 --> 00:11:48.480
And that type of ingrained societal or cultural meme is slowly fading away.
00:11:48.639 --> 00:11:52.559
People want to live longer and um in good health.
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:56.799
So lifespan for longevity is based on how long we can live in good health.
00:11:57.120 --> 00:12:06.720
And in my view, we can live as long as biomedical interventions and technology and its advances provide solutions to the disease of aging.
00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:15.600
And so we could live many hundreds of years with biology and far longer within semi-biological environments.
00:12:15.759 --> 00:12:22.000
Remember, the hydra within its environment of water is immortal or never dies.
00:12:22.399 --> 00:12:31.759
However, taken out of that environment, the consequences are clearly fundamental to its life and cannot exist outside of water.
00:12:31.919 --> 00:12:36.320
So we need to think about the environments we're living in, our exchange, our ecosystem.
00:12:37.039 --> 00:12:43.360
Yeah, so thinking about our ecosystem and um actually a kind of societal environment, if you like.
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:51.759
I remember I saw um Peter Schwartz talking, I think it was one at the world, one of the World Future Society conferences, and he was talking about longevity.
00:12:52.159 --> 00:13:10.559
And he made the point that he was talking about, let's say, you know, if if the younger generation who were in the audience lived to 120, and he was talking about obviously uh future generations living longer than that, but if they were living to 120, you know, they could be married for 100 years.
00:13:10.799 --> 00:13:17.279
So to pick that person wisely, because you could be having to put up with them for a long time.
00:13:17.519 --> 00:13:33.840
My question to you really is around this societal environment, if there is no aging, or if there is greater longevity and we are living a lot longer, we're not really going to see ourselves as aging, are we?
00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:39.759
Certainly, let's say at the age of 200, we wouldn't necessarily see ourselves as being old.
00:13:40.000 --> 00:13:54.720
So do you think a life where we have such longevity, super longevity, we're also, you know, aging is disappearing, but so is the language around, you know, an old person or an aged person.
00:13:55.039 --> 00:13:58.720
What do you think the implications are for, you know, for society?
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:06.879
I think the implications are very strong because you know, consider age as a number that holds significant social prestige.
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:13.519
A person conjures up all sorts of views, opinions, beliefs, and prejudice based on age.
00:14:13.840 --> 00:14:22.879
And you know, we consider the the older person, the senior person, signifies knowledge and wisdom, and the younger person signifies youth and foolishness.
00:14:23.039 --> 00:14:26.799
But that again is binary thinking, which is not always accurate.
00:14:26.960 --> 00:14:29.919
In fact, the converse is often true.
00:14:30.559 --> 00:14:44.799
And I think that the social structures that have created this norm for what age looks like and how we're supposed to respond to age or step away from age is shifting at its core.
00:14:45.039 --> 00:14:48.320
And I think that that Swartz makes a really good point.
00:14:48.480 --> 00:14:52.559
It's tongue-in-cheek that if you live 200 and you're married, you're going to be married to the same person.
00:14:52.720 --> 00:15:01.440
Well, I mean, that's kind of a I think that the whole idea of marriage is shifting, and you people used to think you had to be married to one person.
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:04.960
If you divorced, then you had a bad or failed marriage.
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:06.720
But now we look at it differently.
00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:13.360
You hear people coming out of a marriage, maybe they married 10, 20, 30, 40 years, and they said they had a good marriage.
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:15.759
It lasted as long, it ran its course.
00:15:16.000 --> 00:15:20.799
People leave as friends, and I think that is the the wise thing to consider.
00:15:21.360 --> 00:15:31.600
With that, we don't, you know, marriage doesn't mean you're forever with one person for the rest of your life, just like we don't have one career for the rest of our lives, and and I think I'm a good example of that.
00:15:32.639 --> 00:15:40.639
But separately, aging is a biological condition brought about by the loss of cellular and metabolic functioning.
00:15:41.200 --> 00:15:54.000
So if we consider maybe the Hay Fleck theory, early on in the 1960s, it was espoused a lot of cell division means that there's a limit on the capacity or then many, how many times a cell can divide.
00:15:54.240 --> 00:15:56.080
And so that means we have a shelf life.
00:15:56.159 --> 00:16:00.639
And we this goes back to the 123 approximate maximum years for lifespan.
00:16:01.039 --> 00:16:02.799
But this is not a good thing.
00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:08.159
And the process of aging ought to be slowed down and reversed for the health of society and people.
00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:43.759
A lot of our angst, perhaps, aggression and depression, stems from a limited time frame on how long we're going to be alive, andor from the diseases that we have: depression, anxiety, certain psychological influencers of envy and jealousy and greed and all those things that are very reptilian, fight or flight, and as well as the diseases of dementia and Alzheimer's and you know the heart disease and all these different diseases frighten us.
00:16:43.919 --> 00:16:49.679
And what would it be like if we didn't have to live by that dictum?
00:16:49.919 --> 00:17:04.559
What would it be like if we didn't have to have the albatross of time and age and you know the symbolic rhetoric and archetypes of it constantly elbowing their way into our conscious mind?
00:17:04.960 --> 00:17:06.319
We would be freed from that.
00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:07.440
And what would we do?
00:17:07.680 --> 00:17:11.759
Many people say we'd be bored with longer lives, but I don't think so.
00:17:11.920 --> 00:17:20.799
I think we haven't even scratched the surface of who we could become as an evolved humanity, perhaps.
00:17:21.680 --> 00:17:25.119
It is challenging though, isn't it, to think about our lives.
00:17:25.440 --> 00:17:28.960
I mean, I was even going to say the phrase going forward, but even that's linear.
00:17:29.519 --> 00:17:39.599
Thinking of our lives, you know, chronologically, it's very, very difficult to think of our lives for most people, but uh in any way that isn't linear.
00:17:39.759 --> 00:17:46.400
Because obviously we think back in history, we think forward to our visions and our dreams and our hopes, and obviously we're in the present.
00:17:46.480 --> 00:17:50.960
And those three time horizons are very connected in a certain sequence.
00:17:51.200 --> 00:18:06.880
I guess when you talk about some of the other aspects of transhumanism, like cognitive intelligence and mind uploading and things like that, would be inhabiting a different kind of sphere, perhaps we might call it the cyber sphere, that isn't really chronological time.
00:18:06.960 --> 00:18:25.039
So, do you think the more that we consider that and try to bring it about in reality, the more we will get used to sort of a different time construct, and that will take us away from the whole idea of, you know, uh a limited life and a chronological time?
00:18:25.759 --> 00:18:26.559
Yes, I do.
00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:29.920
I think that I think that we're we're seeing the beginnings of this.
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:31.440
It's on the horizon.
00:18:31.680 --> 00:18:48.160
For example, the virtuality and gamification of education, the awareness of space exploration and coming back into the biosphere, the weight of gravity, once having been freed from gravity, going back to gravity, you know, it's it's hard to walk at first.
00:18:48.480 --> 00:19:09.279
Seeing experience with um, in again, virtuality, going into that sphere uh where you move information and um synthetic structures and virtual agencies back and forth through time, and then you go back into this physical material world, it's quite different to get a grasp on it again.
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:15.680
So I think that we're developing this equilibrium through different modalities, different environments.
00:19:15.839 --> 00:19:30.559
And I think again, that's just on the horizon for what we can be doing, where uh time will not be exclusively linear, it'll be varied, going back and forth in time, across time, leaping through time.
00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:35.759
There are some movies that kind of exemplify this in a very entertaining way.
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:43.200
Limitless is one movie that is quite exponential in its time prognostication.
00:19:43.359 --> 00:19:52.960
Other movies like Memento, you know, where you have no memory and you're you have to really rely on what you write on your skin to remember day to day.
00:19:53.200 --> 00:20:01.359
You ask those who have been in a coma or you know suffered from some time of time differentiation what it's like.
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:02.960
And it's it's hard to adjust.
00:20:03.039 --> 00:20:20.640
But if you scuba dive like I do, and you go into the sea and you go down 40 feet, 100 feet, when you uh resubmerge in the water, uh you have to stop and pause and let your body adjust and go to another 15 feet and stop and pause and let the body adjust.
00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:39.039
So, like with space exploration for astronauts and for uh scuba divers who do deep sea diving or you know, night diving, every time we go through these environments, these ecosystems, we have to come back and readapt to get our homeostasis back on target and balance.
00:20:39.359 --> 00:20:47.440
And I think that those particular physical experiences or exercises help us better understand what it will be like.
00:20:47.599 --> 00:20:58.079
I think the same as for someone who's a gamer that goes into a game and lives in that environment and then comes back out into this world, this biosphere, has an adjustment to make.
00:20:58.240 --> 00:21:06.799
So we're all making adjustments as we're going through the virtual, the artificial, the synthetic environments, and then adapting.
00:21:07.039 --> 00:21:10.480
For the transhumanist perspective, this is quite normal.
00:21:10.640 --> 00:21:35.440
And there's been a lot of work, uh, writing research on what will the human be like as far as identity in the future when we can coexist in these multiple environments, and how will we keep this continuity of ourselves intact without having fractured identity that could cause chaos in, you know, mentally.
00:21:35.599 --> 00:21:52.240
So these are all things that are really important that tie into longevity and aging and looking at the technologies that will give us different environments to exist on, or it's often said substrates or platforms to exist within or on.
00:21:53.599 --> 00:21:59.680
So you've done quite a lot of work, haven't you, on what those substrates should be like or or could be like.
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:13.279
I'm thinking in particular your work on the whole body prosthetic, or there was a great quote here actually from a piece of work I saw of yours called Body by Design, where you talked about the importance of art and the aesthetics.
00:22:13.440 --> 00:22:17.839
I think you said the aesthetic approach and design intensifies perceptions of reality.
00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:31.519
Bodily adornments and artifacts have become wearable technologies, computerised devices and apps, altering physiology by adding strength to our muscles, speed to our limbs, intelligence to our cognition, and memory to our experience.
00:22:31.759 --> 00:22:33.839
And I really did wonder about that last bit.
00:22:33.920 --> 00:22:48.640
And given everything you've just said about memory and identity and the continuity of the person, how can we, using some of these systems and design, add to the memory or use memory to add to our experience?
00:22:49.039 --> 00:22:51.359
What have you got in mind there specifically?
00:22:52.640 --> 00:23:08.480
Well, I think memory is a composite of experiences and helps us remember who we were and project who we are today and imagine who we might become tomorrow based on the continuity or the combination of experiences.
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:17.119
If thinking about that body by design, it was originally prima post-human that I innovated in 1996 with a metabrain.
00:23:17.200 --> 00:23:21.039
And I'm going to mention the metabrain because I think that's that's important here.
00:23:21.359 --> 00:23:54.799
The concept for that future whole body prosthetic or prostheses was to act as a non-aging engineered body that one could have in this environment, this ecosystem of the biosphere, and also have a connection called the metabrain to other types of platforms or substrates, computational, cybernetic, synthetic, whole brain emulation, type of uploading and downloading to simplify it.
00:23:55.119 --> 00:24:09.440
And the the continuity there would be that it would be continuous, that any gaps in it would be smoothed out through a link to an idea that would represent what occurred during that time.
00:24:09.519 --> 00:24:16.240
So just like today, I mean, you know, you you stop and you you daydream for a moment, then you come back to reality, go, oh, what was I thinking?
00:24:16.480 --> 00:24:19.200
Those those things are not problems with cognition.
00:24:19.359 --> 00:24:24.799
They're just giving yourself a moment to redigest where you are in life at that at that time.
00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:28.640
And those reflective processes go on continually.
00:24:29.039 --> 00:24:34.240
Sometimes you're totally alert and aware of what you're doing moment to moment, and other times you kind of space out.
00:24:34.400 --> 00:24:40.960
But as you're spacing out, your body's doing something else and your mind's doing something else that are equally interesting.
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:50.799
So the issue there is that the need to have a backup system for the brain is really important.
00:24:51.039 --> 00:25:08.960
And I think that's what I was aiming for with that project, and looking at the future of AI and nanomedicine, for example, and the importance of that as far as why are we in longevity or super longevity in the first place?
00:25:09.119 --> 00:25:10.960
We want to live longer, healthier lives.
00:25:11.119 --> 00:25:13.680
123 years isn't long enough.
00:25:14.000 --> 00:25:15.759
Okay, that is a given.
00:25:15.920 --> 00:25:21.759
We want to live healthy lives with longer, maybe 100 years, maybe 200 years, however longer.
00:25:22.079 --> 00:25:24.799
Do we really want to stay in this biosphere?
00:25:24.960 --> 00:25:28.319
Maybe, maybe not, but that will probably be an option.
00:25:28.559 --> 00:25:46.720
Some people may prefer to remain exclusively biological in these bodies, others may opt for my design, prima post-human, and have a prosthesis to exist within in this biosphere and upload or transfer memory and cognitive properties into other worlds.
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:53.759
And that's really frightening to many people, and they don't understand the continuity of who they are in those worlds.
00:25:53.920 --> 00:26:03.279
But if we consider that, let's just let's take the onus off of that and say, okay, yes, it could work and it will work, let's just start there.
00:26:03.359 --> 00:26:05.519
And if it does work, what would it be like?
00:26:05.680 --> 00:26:11.359
Well, it wouldn't be too much different than being a deep-sea diver, a scuba diver, or an astronaut.
00:26:11.519 --> 00:26:17.519
You go into another world, you experience a different environment, you adapt and adjust to it, and then you come back.
00:26:17.759 --> 00:26:57.359
So if we look at the highway of the future and what that transportation modality could be, it might be a seamless transference of a person identity from our ecosystem in the biosphere to a computational system, into a gamification, into all sorts of different environments, simulated and non-simulated, and that would probably become as seamless as it is for me to be here in Scottsdale talking to you in the UK through a studio that has a microphone and a headset.
00:26:57.920 --> 00:27:18.799
And I can't see you and you can't see me, but I trust that you're you and you trust that I'm me because we had an agreement prior to this, and we know each other's background, we checked each other out, we Googled each other, let's say, and we see that we're good people, we have a solid reputation as scholars or entrepreneurs or innovators.
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:34.240
And those elements outperform any type of negativity or bias someone may have said or written about us, but we we trust the that I went to university, I got my doctorate, you went to here, and you got your this, and so we have this agreement.
00:27:34.480 --> 00:27:47.680
And it doesn't matter that I can't see you or you can't see me because we're so engaged in what we're sharing from our experiences and our you know curiousness about this conversation that that becomes primary.
00:27:47.839 --> 00:27:58.480
And I think in the future, as far as identity is concerned and memory, that what will be primary is the instantaneous integrity of the discussion or the communication.
00:27:59.359 --> 00:28:00.400
That's fascinating.
00:28:01.119 --> 00:28:07.200
In that scenario though, what what happens to our senses because it is so uh cognitive?
00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:20.640
What about the what about the physicality for not sort of working out whether you can trust someone or kind of checking them out or even your intuition, just uh sensing what's around you and communicating that to the other person?
00:28:20.799 --> 00:28:32.880
How does how does the senses influence or communicate back to the mental states when it is a kind of mind uploaded or or it's just pure cognition in a different substrate?
00:28:33.359 --> 00:29:02.640
It's so interesting that you asked that, and we've we've veered in this direction because just two days ago I was watching a YouTube expose on body language by an expert in body language, and he was reviewing a recent incident at the Academy Awards and taking down every moment-to-moment facial expression, body language with the hands, the shoulders, you know, the stride, the body movements, and what was probably or possibly going on.
00:29:03.519 --> 00:29:17.839
And it's interesting that because we can't see each other, I'm listening to the tonality of your voice, the amplitude, or the velocity of the words, and the reflections, your pauses, and it's a visual thing.
00:29:18.000 --> 00:29:28.960
So even though I can't see you, I'm visualizing because you're speaking with a tonality and a reference point that affords a visual interpretation.
00:29:29.119 --> 00:29:33.759
So maybe our senses will increase in ways that we haven't considered.
00:29:34.240 --> 00:29:45.920
We know that a bat can do things we can't do with its hearing, and that a will can do things with escalation that we can't do, and a dog can smell things that we can't smell, etc.
00:29:46.319 --> 00:29:56.079
So other animals have senses that are far more refined and advanced than our capabilities, but that doesn't mean our senses can't be even more enhanced and capable.
00:29:56.160 --> 00:30:25.039
And and it go back to my whole body prosthetic, prima posthuman, that I included this in that particular engineering or a theoretical engineering of the prosthesis, that our senses would be enhanced to catch things that we might not catch otherwise, and to be able to increase the volume or reduce the volume, to be able to see telescopically or microscopically and reduce and improve that.
00:30:25.359 --> 00:30:38.160
So I think that our senses, um, to cut to the chase here, will advance and largely through devices and uh enhancement and other types of things.
00:30:38.400 --> 00:30:41.359
But what I think the question becomes, why?
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:42.720
Why would we need to do this?
00:30:42.880 --> 00:30:45.920
And I think the answer is because we want to communicate.
00:30:46.160 --> 00:31:00.880
And it all kind of boils down to our need and desire to communicate, to find likeness, to expose differences, to try to share love, to experience.
00:31:01.119 --> 00:31:05.839
And, you know, without love and kindness and sharing, what's the point?
00:31:06.000 --> 00:31:07.920
You just sit by yourself and masturbate.
00:31:08.000 --> 00:31:14.160
You know, it's so it's you know, it's so the the what we want to do is to have engagement.
00:31:14.400 --> 00:31:17.680
Some people need more engagement than others, but you know, that's okay.
00:31:17.839 --> 00:31:24.720
The level or degree of engagement is is, you know, can be parsed out to you know individual personality and behaviors.
00:31:25.039 --> 00:31:29.119
But the whole point is is to have that shared sensibility.
00:31:29.519 --> 00:31:36.559
Yeah, because I was wondering if the senses would be enhanced rather than diminished, because I was listening to Eric Schmidt the other day.
00:31:36.720 --> 00:31:44.319
I think I've mentioned this on the podcast before, but he was talking about having AI assistants that could obviously fill out around the world and detect.
00:31:46.240 --> 00:31:47.119
Oh, well, there you go.
00:31:47.279 --> 00:31:49.279
You can go on, you can tell the original.
00:31:49.440 --> 00:31:55.920
Well, tell it, tell us about that because that's fascinating because it could open more doors to perception rather than shut them, I felt.
00:31:56.319 --> 00:31:59.440
Yeah, I wrote about this many years ago.
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:07.680
And um, actually, I worked with Peter Voss, who is the co-creator of artificial general intelligence.
00:32:07.839 --> 00:32:12.960
He co-u-coined the term with Ben Gertzwall and a couple of other people.
00:32:13.200 --> 00:32:24.880
And Peter and I were talking again a few decades ago about AGI, and I was working on at that time uh what I thought would be a great cognitive assistant.
00:32:25.119 --> 00:32:34.000
And this is based on my concern about binary thinking, biases, hearsay, uh, judgment, prejudices, and et cetera.
00:32:34.240 --> 00:32:42.319
And it was in the 1990s, I remember I got some bad press by people who said, oh, she doesn't care about her body, she just wants to live forever.
00:32:42.559 --> 00:32:46.000
She's an elite, you know, one of those wealthy Silicon Valley people.
00:32:46.079 --> 00:32:48.160
And I'm going, I don't live in Silicon Valley.
00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:51.839
I work three jobs working on both my master's degree and my PhD.
00:32:51.920 --> 00:32:53.039
I work full-time.
00:32:53.279 --> 00:32:55.839
I waited tables for my undergraduate.
00:32:55.920 --> 00:33:02.559
You know, I come from a you know a good family, but I worked from you know 16 and continue working today.
00:33:02.720 --> 00:33:07.359
I was never handed anything, and I had to work twice as hard as a woman.
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:09.920
And I say that very openly.
00:33:10.160 --> 00:33:22.240
Uh so my reaction to any journalist or or you know media person saying that, making this false assumption about uh me, caused me to go, okay, wait a minute.
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:25.039
I'm getting angry, I don't like that.
00:33:25.200 --> 00:33:27.279
Wait, I'm getting resentful, I don't like that.
00:33:27.359 --> 00:33:38.720
So I thought I I would love to have an AI work with my brain, with my personality and my reactions, to go, oh, wait a minute, do you really want to do that?
00:33:38.880 --> 00:33:40.160
Hey, stop a moment.
00:33:40.319 --> 00:34:02.640
So I saw it as a type of best friend that would kind of be like the angel on your shoulder, instead of like having knee-jerk reaction to things and getting angry or you know, defensive and retaliating, maybe to think about it, to be a little bit wiser, to pause for a moment and collect, you know, your thoughts and realize the person saying this may have their own problem.
00:34:02.799 --> 00:34:08.400
You know, maybe it's not directed towards you, maybe they're making an assumption based on something that they experience.
00:34:08.559 --> 00:34:20.960
So I came up with this idea, this AGI assistant, and it would be an augment to the brain, and it would be part of that meta-brain, and it would be working on, you know, 24-7, doing instant replay.
00:34:21.039 --> 00:34:27.360
So if you said something and you left the room and you thought, oh, did I really say that, or did I really interpret that correctly?
00:34:27.519 --> 00:34:32.079
This AI assistant would would replay the situation to you.
00:34:32.159 --> 00:34:42.320
So you go, oh, I see what I did, or I, you know, you you can have a more accurate memory than what most of us have, which is a a subjective memory.
00:34:42.880 --> 00:34:46.480
And that was published as a paper, and it's quite good.
00:34:46.559 --> 00:34:48.719
It's right on my website, as a matter of fact.
00:34:48.800 --> 00:34:53.920
It's called Wisdom Meta-Knowledge through HEI Neural Macrosensing.
00:34:54.159 --> 00:35:18.639
And uh yeah, right on my website, I wrote that and the worked on it in 1999, published the paper in 2006, and it says wisdom meta-knowledge through AGI neuromacrosensing, in other words, narrow advanced AI and neuromacrosensing, which is a whole uh sensing system and your central nervous system and peripheral nervous system in acquiring wisdom.
00:35:18.800 --> 00:35:57.119
And so this AGI assist would give you feedback and reflection, analysis, help you better weigh your responses to situations in life through a stronger mindfulness, to better steer us to be clearer thinkers and more agile, and to be more compassionate, I suppose, rather than retreat with a defensive statement or an offensive attack to weigh the conversation carefully, to respond in ways that would advance thinking and emotional input and output.
00:35:57.280 --> 00:35:59.360
I think that's the main thing for it.
00:35:59.519 --> 00:36:13.360
But getting to that point, I think it's really, I mean, I wish we had it today because things are so emotional, so heated in the binary landscape, that I just wish people would pause for a moment before overreacting to things, myself included.
00:36:13.519 --> 00:36:19.280
I think all of us are part of this, this it's almost an amplified emotional state.
00:36:19.519 --> 00:36:35.599
So getting, how do we reduce that with the social media pressures and the instantaneous internet thumbs up, people not informed, maybe thumbs upping someone's bad behavior when you have a slap in the face?
00:36:35.760 --> 00:36:37.679
That's totally inappropriate.
00:36:37.920 --> 00:36:41.599
But to that person, it was in that moment and it and it happens.
00:36:41.760 --> 00:37:03.440
And looking at the Ukraine right now and and that the hurt all of us feel, and it's just this continuous immediate observation about global information and global tragedies without enough balance for the global good things that are going on and the global kindnesses and successes.
00:37:03.599 --> 00:37:10.719
So we're it's the scale is not balanced, it's leading towards a pretty unhealthy emotional state.
00:37:10.880 --> 00:37:13.280
You know, if you put if you took the temperature, yeah.
00:37:13.599 --> 00:37:22.480
It feels like we're being programmed to react continually, immediately, and that you know, you get the biggest reactions when you show the greatest harms.
00:37:22.639 --> 00:37:25.920
And that's something that I feel like we're getting into a cycle of.
00:37:26.079 --> 00:37:30.880
But you know, maybe the AI assist can remove us from that or help us stand back.
00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:45.280
Or it made me wonder if this does come off and we have these sort of sensing devices or AI or extensions, if you like, if they do become more part of the self rather than a separate device.
00:37:45.440 --> 00:37:50.079
I mean, we'll have such a continual exchange of data, and it'll be very personal data.
00:37:50.239 --> 00:37:52.960
It makes me wonder if this becomes quite integrated.
00:37:53.119 --> 00:38:07.199
And either we're developing these multiple cells because we have these almost monitors, these AI monitors, these friendly monitors helping us, turning inward to help us deal with the world, or perhaps it does become integrated and it becomes part of the self.
00:38:07.360 --> 00:38:09.360
I don't know if you've got any views on that.
00:38:09.679 --> 00:38:10.719
Oh, yes, I do.
00:38:10.880 --> 00:38:11.840
I do, I do.
00:38:12.000 --> 00:38:23.119
I think that without any question, it will become part of ourselves and um be seen as a natural aspect of ourselves.
00:38:23.440 --> 00:38:53.760
And I also think that will help us with our fundamental uh programming and to take us from the uh brainstem, fight or flight reaction or rectilian brain, more towards a frontal lobe with some finessing along the way, so that our frontal lobe and the aspects of the brain that are more the logical will not be just logical or rational, that they'll have a semblance of smart emotions.
00:38:53.920 --> 00:39:04.000
So when I worked on this years ago, I also wrote about smart emotions and the need to have smart emotions, basically, that the that were always on alert.
00:39:04.159 --> 00:39:20.559
And we had to be for our survival from the savannas to fight or flight to overcoming all sorts of hardships on a daily basis in our earliest evolution to overcoming the social dictums on us today and the pressure of that.
00:39:21.440 --> 00:39:23.280
It's a continuous battle.
00:39:23.440 --> 00:39:27.599
It'd be lovely to get to a point where our skins were not so thin, is what I'm saying.
00:39:27.760 --> 00:39:36.960
Our membrane could be smarter and um uh absorb more, absorb more positive stuff rather than toxins that are around us.
00:39:37.360 --> 00:39:42.000
I was also wondering whether it could help with dementia or people who are cognitively impaired.
00:39:42.159 --> 00:39:59.280
I mean, if you know soon enough, then maybe you can turn to some of these enhancements to either help you record memories or store memories or play them back to you, or sense out new, because obviously when one's suffering from dementia, some senses recede and other senses strengthen.
00:39:59.519 --> 00:40:01.360
I've noticed that in people I know.
00:40:01.440 --> 00:40:10.800
And again, you know, maybe this could be a very valued enhancement for people who do end up suffering with these sorts of cognitive impairments.
00:40:11.119 --> 00:40:13.920
I think so on a you know, a step two basis.
00:40:14.079 --> 00:40:27.039
I think step three would be the, I'd like to talk about not in this right now in this part of our conversation, but I think that step three would be nanorobots repairing neurological damage, uh, continuously biocompatible.
00:40:27.199 --> 00:40:34.159
But as far as the devices augmenting or enhancing our senses, um, I think definitely could help with dementia.
00:40:34.320 --> 00:40:39.840
Not so much with uh, you know, certain other cognitive diseases like Alzheimer's, where memory's gone.
00:40:40.000 --> 00:40:51.519
And there's not much that can be done there at this time, but is but if memories are, you know, they're part of the brains that aren't functioning because of dementia, then certainly there's a hope that those memories can be found and restored.
00:40:51.920 --> 00:40:52.320
Yeah.
00:40:52.559 --> 00:40:54.559
So so what other work have you been doing?
00:40:54.639 --> 00:41:04.639
Because I know you you you have done a lot of um experiments, you've done a lot of scientific research into life extension, or I know you've done work in uh cryonics.
00:41:04.719 --> 00:41:21.119
Um, I'm wondering if you can just give our listeners a bit of an insight into the sort of practical scientific advancements that uh you've either been involved with or have you know have been privy to, and helps to give us more of a picture about where transhumanism is is going practically.
00:41:21.840 --> 00:41:23.360
Okay, um let me think here.
00:41:23.599 --> 00:41:32.480
Okay, I think to lead into that, uh setting the pace that the life extension and the longevity industry has been around for a long time.
00:41:32.639 --> 00:41:33.679
Most people don't realize that.
00:41:33.760 --> 00:41:35.119
They think it's just recent.
00:41:35.360 --> 00:41:37.679
It's not, it's been around a long time.
00:41:37.760 --> 00:41:57.280
But let's just say most of the practical aspects of biomedical interventions for longevity, say in the 1960s with Roy Walford, uh, maximum lifespans, uh, Dick Pearson and Sandy Shaw, I mean, there is there's some really key figures there that really establish the life extension industry and movement.
00:41:57.519 --> 00:42:18.800
Unfortunately, and you mentioned early on that the 20 years that have gone by there, well, there hasn't been much going on other than band-aids, you know, therapies, CRISPR, stem cells, uh, vitamins, um, you know, injections, um hormone replacement therapy, all these different therapies are great, but they're they're not really extending life.
00:42:19.039 --> 00:42:33.199
So all we have there is number one, which I think is plan A, which is cryonics, which you touched on, and then from there go into nanomedicine, and then the the third I would say would be the whole body prosthesis.
00:42:33.440 --> 00:42:43.039
So with my work, I I tend to look at the work that's been done prior to me and see what has been accomplished and if there's any gaps.
00:42:43.360 --> 00:42:52.800
And I filled the gap for the whole body prosthesis in 1996, and that work was really well received.
00:42:53.039 --> 00:43:00.079
What if we had a whole body prosthesis that could back up the brain and you know live and you know be an alternative body?
00:43:00.320 --> 00:43:08.800
But I think that as far as what I stands out more is is something that is not so theoretical, something that is actual.
00:43:09.280 --> 00:43:26.480
In crossing fields from let's just say science to design, and I'm also uh have you know work as a futurist in future studies and ethics, the aim is always, no matter what field I'm in or what I'm working on, the aim has always been to innovate.
00:43:26.800 --> 00:43:35.199
And I think that's the earlier artist in me, or the designer or the architecture of innovation really, really fascinates me.
00:43:35.280 --> 00:43:38.159
So I look for gaps and I found a gap.
00:43:38.320 --> 00:43:44.239
In the sciences, I found that the issue of memory and cryonics.
00:43:44.400 --> 00:43:48.000
And so understanding this, that there was a gap.
00:43:48.159 --> 00:43:58.320
In other words, we know that we can cryosuspend animals, humans and simple animals, and we know that simple animals can be revived, brought back to healthy life.
00:43:58.480 --> 00:43:59.760
This Yelegans, this has been put.
00:44:00.159 --> 00:44:03.679
Proven in scientific research on numerous occasions.
00:44:04.239 --> 00:44:09.599
But the part that was missing was that you can revive a simple animal like a C.
00:44:09.760 --> 00:44:14.000
elegans nematode, but no one had checked to see if that C.
00:44:14.159 --> 00:44:22.719
elegans' memory was intact, or whether it's a neurological structure which is based on 302 neurons were functioning after being revived.
00:44:22.880 --> 00:44:26.079
If you're going to be revived, you want to have your memory, right?
00:44:26.159 --> 00:44:27.440
You want to have an identity.
00:44:27.599 --> 00:44:28.880
It doesn't want to be a thing.
00:44:29.119 --> 00:44:31.360
So I this really stood out for me.
00:44:31.599 --> 00:44:36.000
So I developed a laboratory to address the what-if question.
00:44:36.079 --> 00:44:37.760
And that question is, what if?
00:44:38.000 --> 00:44:42.159
Will chronic patients remember who they were after they were brought back to life?
00:44:42.320 --> 00:44:47.760
I mean, very obvious question to ask, and one I've been asked many times in doing interviews.
00:44:47.920 --> 00:44:50.239
And my answer was, well, we hope so.
00:44:50.400 --> 00:44:51.039
We don't know.
00:44:51.199 --> 00:44:53.199
And I thought, okay, I'm tired of saying that.
00:44:53.360 --> 00:44:56.079
I'm going to say definitively yes or no.
00:44:56.559 --> 00:45:05.119
So I couldn't work on a human, obviously, because we don't have the biomedical interventions to mitigate the damage.
00:45:05.679 --> 00:45:08.639
So that's really a bit far off for me.
00:45:09.119 --> 00:45:14.159
So I put that theoretical question of will chronics patients remember to test?
00:45:14.320 --> 00:45:22.719
And I developed a methodology for testing long-term memory of simple animals who have been placed in chronics and revived.
00:45:22.800 --> 00:45:24.960
And I worked with a simple animal.
00:45:25.119 --> 00:45:38.159
Remember, this is simple, not a complex animal, a simple animal, and I chose one that, regardless of its simplicity, is exceedingly renowned in biomedical research, and that simple animals known as the C.
00:45:38.320 --> 00:45:44.719
elegans, which is a nematode or an ematode, which means, in plain speech, it's earthworm.
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:56.800
These elegant creatures, and thus elegans, early name Latin Greek for elegant, have actually been the heroes of four Nobel Prizes in scientific research.
00:45:56.960 --> 00:45:59.920
So it's a highly renowned, respected, simple animal.
00:46:00.079 --> 00:46:01.280
And that's the one I chose.
00:46:01.599 --> 00:46:08.719
And I did, my methodology is based on olfactory imprinting, which means smell association with food.
00:46:08.880 --> 00:46:29.119
So when they were babies, I associated their food with a particular chemical, benzeldehyde, in their feeding essays and vitrified them in cryonics using a slow, safe speed method, cryotop, which is often used with embryo freezing, which is a very commonplace everyday practice.
00:46:29.280 --> 00:46:35.039
So I wanted a renowned simple animal and I wanted a practice that had already been accepted in society.
00:46:35.199 --> 00:46:39.440
So I wasn't pushing any, you know, anyone's neck out of joint.
00:46:39.599 --> 00:46:43.119
And I thought, okay, so those things, then I'll have to teach it something.
00:46:43.199 --> 00:46:47.039
And I use the Pavlovian protocol of imprinting.
00:46:47.280 --> 00:46:50.880
And with smell, smell is highly associated with memory.
00:46:51.119 --> 00:46:57.440
And the the long and short of it is that working with hundreds and hundreds of these C.
00:46:57.599 --> 00:47:27.679
elegan nematodes, we proved, my lab and I proved, that long-term memory was intact, that after bringing these simple animals out of cryonics, out of vitrification, and place warming them up in a very comfortable ecosystem, putting them in the petri dish with very healthy argur, which is a type of jelly, and watching them under the microscope to see if they went to the food with the Chemical Association or went to the food without the Chemical Association.
00:47:27.840 --> 00:47:30.079
That would prove long-term memory.
00:47:30.320 --> 00:47:38.079
And in fact, they went to the food with the Chemical Association in the olfactory or a smell imprinting.
00:47:38.239 --> 00:47:40.800
And it wasn't just a few, it was all of them.
00:47:41.039 --> 00:47:45.920
And so that imprinting lasted through crowd preservation.
00:47:46.079 --> 00:47:48.239
And that was really exciting to me.
00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:56.000
And I published a paper in rejuvenation research, and it had over 16,000 downloads within the first couple of months.
00:47:56.159 --> 00:47:58.880
So it is really a wonderful first.
00:47:59.119 --> 00:48:00.239
I love that I did it.
00:48:00.320 --> 00:48:01.199
I love the work.
00:48:01.360 --> 00:48:05.039
I loved my team and I did what I set out to do.
00:48:05.199 --> 00:48:06.000
And that's that.
00:48:06.159 --> 00:48:07.679
But it I learned a lot from it.
00:48:07.840 --> 00:48:14.239
And I think the next step of that research is the secondary findings, which was a happenstance.
00:48:14.400 --> 00:48:20.639
And that was in the Petri dish while I was, you know, checking out the their health and their movement.
00:48:20.800 --> 00:48:23.840
You see how they swim, and that's a sign of health.
00:48:24.079 --> 00:48:26.960
I saw one of the worms was laying eggs.
00:48:27.119 --> 00:48:40.639
And I looked and I looked and I captured on video and in images of the eggs hatching and little babies swimming out of their ovum or their eggs and um, you know, growing up.
00:48:40.719 --> 00:48:42.320
And it was really quite wonderful.
00:48:42.480 --> 00:48:56.559
So the secondary outcome of that research was that the pregnant simple animals can be put in cryonics while pregnant and give birth when after being brought out and revived.
00:48:56.719 --> 00:48:58.000
And so that's quite wonderful.
00:48:58.079 --> 00:49:01.840
I haven't written about that, but I will be talking about it at an upcoming conference soon.
00:49:02.159 --> 00:49:03.280
Wow, that's amazing.
00:49:03.440 --> 00:49:05.519
Um, remind me what year that was.
00:49:05.920 --> 00:49:11.039
The research started in 2014 and the paper was published in 2015.
00:49:11.360 --> 00:49:16.719
And do you feel that that research has had the public acknowledgement that it deserves?
00:49:17.039 --> 00:49:17.360
No.
00:49:17.599 --> 00:49:17.920
No.
00:49:18.079 --> 00:49:23.599
So you see, this this is one of the things I really w want to ask you as we draw to the conclusion.
00:49:23.679 --> 00:49:28.079
I'm I'm afraid of this uh conversation which I could um have forever.
00:49:28.239 --> 00:49:50.159
But you see, there's a lot of chat at the moment, and there has been in Silicon Valley, obviously, over the past few years, and you've got people like Balaji Srinivazan writing that life extension is the most important thing that we can invent, and talking about, you know, how longer lifespans lead to the reduction in the cost of everything, and so it's our purpose of technology to eliminate mortality.
00:49:50.480 --> 00:50:02.400
You've been talking about this for a long time, you've done the hard yards of doing research into this, you've published an inordinate amount of papers, you've lectured.
00:50:02.639 --> 00:50:06.880
You know, why hasn't this taken off more than it should have?
00:50:07.119 --> 00:50:10.719
Or maybe, and I hope you don't mind me saying this, why aren't you?
00:50:10.800 --> 00:50:25.679
I mean, because you are very famous in transhumanist circles, but why aren't your blog posts about why life extension is the most important thing we can invent more popular and more circulated than, you know, a VC investor in Silicon Valley?
00:50:26.000 --> 00:50:27.280
That's a really good question.
00:50:27.440 --> 00:50:30.079
And I wonder about that myself, and it breaks my heart.
00:50:31.199 --> 00:50:37.679
You know, I think it has a lot to do with people wanting to get their name out there.
00:50:37.920 --> 00:50:45.360
And it also has a lot to do with people not doing their due diligence on prior art or prior knowledge or prior companies, prior writings.
00:50:46.079 --> 00:50:56.559
When I was full-time faculty and chair of the graduate studies department at university, I would tell my students, always cite the work that came before you.
00:50:56.719 --> 00:51:00.239
Give recognition because your work is based on their work.
00:51:00.400 --> 00:51:10.320
That will not only give them recognition, which is warranted, but will also give you the credence of being a scholar, of being a unique thinker, of someone with integrity.
00:51:10.719 --> 00:51:18.320
Unfortunately, in today's environment, largely, um, people just want to get their name out there and they're like they invented it.
00:51:18.800 --> 00:51:27.119
What's interesting too is I've seen a number of transhumanist manifestos, and I'm going, excuse me, that was written in 1983, and my name's on it.
00:51:27.199 --> 00:51:29.679
It's published in books, many books.
00:51:29.920 --> 00:51:42.320
And even within the scientific realms, because I'm a transhumanist, I get overlooked, and I think that because I'm not selling a product with my name all over the place, I'm the first to do this.
00:51:42.559 --> 00:51:44.559
People are not paying attention.
00:51:44.800 --> 00:51:52.400
And I intentionally did not want to do that because I respect the work too much, and I respect myself too much.
00:51:52.639 --> 00:51:55.760
And in the longevity community, I do see this.
00:51:55.920 --> 00:52:01.760
I see people who say they can solve aging or are solving aging, and they're not.
00:52:02.079 --> 00:52:09.599
And I see people saying, like, uh pushing their product or their company and being the first to do this or the first to do that.
00:52:09.760 --> 00:52:16.800
And maybe they are the first in their particular slice of the pie of longevity, and that's great.
00:52:17.119 --> 00:52:25.039
But the hyperbole around it and the self-promotion around it is, I think, something shameful.
00:52:25.280 --> 00:52:28.880
So maybe I'm a fool, maybe I should have, or maybe not.
00:52:29.039 --> 00:52:32.159
Maybe later on in life I'll be thankful that I didn't.
00:52:32.320 --> 00:52:33.519
I don't know.
00:52:33.920 --> 00:52:37.840
But I I do think that there is a big miss here.
00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:45.760
I think it's it's it speaks louder about uh humanity, our lack of humaneness, and about our lack of respecting others.
00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:52.079
And I think it's it speaks largely about people wanting to be famous and wanting to have their name out there.
00:52:52.480 --> 00:52:54.960
Do you think it's anything to do with gender or not?
00:52:55.039 --> 00:52:55.360
Yes, I think.
00:52:56.320 --> 00:52:57.440
I answered immediately.
00:52:58.079 --> 00:52:58.480
You did.
00:52:59.280 --> 00:53:07.760
Because I I mean, I have spoken before on this podcast series about the lack of very public profiles of women in transhumanism.
00:53:07.920 --> 00:53:19.039
And I know there are lots of women in transhumanism and working in the various aspects of it, whether through art or design or, as you say, science.
00:53:19.280 --> 00:53:23.360
But they don't seem to, and I might be wrong, but they don't seem to have the same sort of profile.
00:53:23.440 --> 00:53:30.239
What's your take on that as the pioneering woman in transhumanism and the one who wrote the original manifesto?
00:53:31.119 --> 00:53:35.199
My take on it is that maybe it's based on several things.
00:53:35.360 --> 00:53:39.920
Maybe it's ageism that I'm older, so I don't matter anymore.
00:53:40.239 --> 00:53:49.360
Maybe because I'm a woman who comes from the humanities and arts, uh, you know, as a performer, a fine artist.
00:53:49.440 --> 00:53:58.239
I've exhibited in museums, my videos have been exhibited at film festivals, I've performed in many places.
00:53:58.400 --> 00:54:00.960
Um, so maybe that aspect of it.
00:54:01.119 --> 00:54:03.119
But artists are highly regarded.
00:54:03.280 --> 00:54:12.000
I mean, if Sting had gotten into longevity, he would be, you know, well, let's take a woman, Annie Lennox or a Beyoncé, you know, they're artists.
00:54:12.239 --> 00:54:14.159
They would be highly revered.
00:54:14.320 --> 00:54:16.800
And um, you know, I don't know.
00:54:16.960 --> 00:54:18.320
Maybe it's my own fault.
00:54:18.559 --> 00:54:24.239
Maybe um I've distance people, I don't know, but I I not intentionally.
00:54:24.480 --> 00:54:30.079
I think that because I'm a woman and a transhumanist and don't have a corporation, perhaps.
00:54:30.239 --> 00:54:39.679
I don't have like a silicon corporation or you know, any that that I'm pushing a product that I'm not taken seriously because it's you know world of entrepreneurs.
00:54:39.840 --> 00:54:41.360
I don't want to push a product.
00:54:41.599 --> 00:54:49.679
And in fact, I intentionally did not because I wanted the science and my own work as a visionary and futurist to speak louder.
00:54:49.920 --> 00:54:52.239
And I think a lot of it is binary thinking.
00:54:52.400 --> 00:55:01.360
You know you wonder why someone is said as the hero of longevity and it's a guy, and you then you look, well, what scientific research has that person done and what breakthrough?
00:55:01.440 --> 00:55:02.880
And you go, well, there isn't anything.
00:55:02.960 --> 00:55:05.039
He's just good at speaking at conferences.
00:55:05.679 --> 00:55:07.679
So I don't know.
00:55:08.079 --> 00:55:12.000
I think it's because you I think you go against the stereotype.
00:55:12.159 --> 00:55:24.159
I think people are quite intimidated and and quite fearful about seeing a woman who's obviously an intellect and who has these visionary thoughts that can alter humanity.
00:55:24.320 --> 00:55:35.039
It just goes against um stereotypes we have of women, and and and it could come from a misperception of transhumanism, and I think it actually does partly.
00:55:35.119 --> 00:55:40.400
Um, but I think it's I think it's that people are are quite intimidated, and that's not an excuse for it.
00:55:40.559 --> 00:55:43.360
And I think, you know, obviously you have lots of work out there.
00:55:43.519 --> 00:55:45.039
I don't mean to diminish it in any way.
00:55:45.119 --> 00:55:57.599
I just it would be nice to hear more people talking about, you know, you as the author and pioneer of the transhumanist manifesto, and for you to have the rightful ownership of it, that's all.
00:55:58.079 --> 00:56:07.679
Yeah, and you know, you know, in thinking, I remember early on when the philosophy was written, even right before the philosophy was written, I wanted to create a movement.
00:56:07.920 --> 00:56:10.000
Movements were normal in the art world.
00:56:10.159 --> 00:56:16.480
You know, if you have the impressionism, post-impressionism, uh, surrealism, every movement.
00:56:16.559 --> 00:56:18.800
And it just seemed like it was a movement.
00:56:19.039 --> 00:56:20.639
So it was always on my mind.
00:56:20.719 --> 00:56:24.239
And yes, I that was an intention, uh, a forthright intention.
00:56:24.400 --> 00:56:35.119
In fact, what's interesting is my advisors at the university where I got my doctorate didn't want me to write on transhumanism because they said you can't write on something you've already created.
00:56:37.119 --> 00:56:37.440
Okay.
00:56:39.840 --> 00:56:41.360
It's yeah, yeah.
00:56:41.679 --> 00:56:47.760
And you know, maybe I should have taken that quote and put it on a billboard.
00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:49.199
Um, but no hard feelings.
00:56:49.280 --> 00:56:50.320
It's it's all good.
00:56:50.400 --> 00:56:51.360
I think it's all good.
00:56:51.440 --> 00:56:58.639
I just think that maybe some of these guys um that you've interviewed, namely, but some of you know the people need to take a pause.
00:56:58.800 --> 00:57:07.440
What's interesting, I remember I was a plenary speaker at a conference at the University of Arizona in Tucson, in Tucson, Arizona.
00:57:07.840 --> 00:57:16.880
And there was a guy who was working with brain preservation, plastination, and me, having worked with memory with C.
00:57:17.039 --> 00:57:20.239
elegans, and he would not look at me the whole time.
00:57:20.480 --> 00:57:22.480
He would not even turn around and look at me.
00:57:22.639 --> 00:57:31.920
And another guy said to David Chalmers, one of the co-organizers of the conference, well, you should have me up there rather than Natasha.
00:57:32.000 --> 00:57:34.960
I'm I'm the expert in whole-brain emulation.
00:57:35.119 --> 00:57:40.159
And David Chalmers was very upset about this and said, This is wrong.
00:57:40.639 --> 00:57:54.960
It was just again, it's part of that thing where if you theorize on something and your work is really good, but you you're you're not from a particular community, then your work does not count.
00:57:55.199 --> 00:57:57.679
So anyway, I I don't know what to do about it.
00:57:57.920 --> 00:58:00.159
You're not the first person who's mentioned this.
00:58:00.320 --> 00:58:09.039
And I'm I'm referring to my AGI assist right now who's telling me that it's the gracious thing to do is say, that's life, you know, all is good.
00:58:10.480 --> 00:58:16.320
Um, you know, it's been going on for so many years, I've kind of gotten a little tone-deaf to it.
00:58:16.800 --> 00:58:28.559
But I I do think it's endemic of a larger issue about where we are and the immaturity of the need for fame and recognition.
00:58:28.880 --> 00:58:35.360
I just I just think um you we need more women in transhumanism, is what I think.
00:58:35.440 --> 00:58:47.360
And so obviously you are a role model and there are some others, but I think the more the better, because I think it will only improve transhumanism and it will only improve the communication about transhumanism to the wider society.
00:58:47.440 --> 00:58:48.639
I really believe that.
00:58:48.960 --> 00:58:49.360
Thank you.
00:58:49.440 --> 00:58:50.079
I do too.
00:58:50.159 --> 00:58:51.119
I really do.
00:58:51.840 --> 00:58:57.519
Well, Natasha, we are unfortunately getting to the end of our fantastic conversation.
00:58:57.760 --> 00:59:12.719
It's been fascinating to talk to you, but I do ask uh all the guests one final question, which is what action, and maybe we've just summarised it, what action um would you like to see for identity in the future?
00:59:12.800 --> 00:59:17.920
We're going to come back in one second to hear your answer, but we're just going to take a slight pause for an ad break.
00:59:18.239 --> 00:59:20.960
The Future of You is sponsored by FutureMade Consulting.
00:59:21.119 --> 00:59:28.880
Writing for outlets like Forbes, Reuters, Cool Hunting and Wired means I'm always on the lookout for those who can inspire me on alternative futures and work with me to activate them.
00:59:29.119 --> 00:59:34.639
That's why I tap into the brains at FutureMade, a network of established professionals in research for strategic thinking.
00:59:34.719 --> 00:59:38.639
They help me spot trends, roadmap innovation, and fully prepare for what comes next.
00:59:38.800 --> 00:59:46.559
They've worked with a host of global brands, businesses and organizations, whether it's consulting, speaking, or curating future on projects big and small.
00:59:46.719 --> 00:59:48.880
They even do training to teach you these skills too.
00:59:49.119 --> 00:59:57.360
Whether you're a CEO, CMO, or just in the business of starting up, FutureMade can help you grow business, design product, and make decisions, or with a future in mind.
00:59:57.599 --> 01:00:00.000
Find out more at futuremade.consulting.
01:00:00.159 --> 01:00:01.360
Made with a future in mind.
01:00:01.840 --> 01:00:02.880
Okay, and we're back.
01:00:02.960 --> 01:00:05.760
So Natasha, your action for identity.
01:00:06.320 --> 01:00:31.440
My action plan for identity would be a more humane humanity, which is inclusive of allowing people just to be who they are, recognizing others' work, building off of it, and embracing a level of kindness, and I suppose that goes to a type of fairness, not meaning equity for all, that everyone needs to be the same or equal.
01:00:31.679 --> 01:00:32.960
No one is ever equal.
01:00:33.360 --> 01:00:38.239
There'll always be someone smarter or faster or kinder.
01:00:38.719 --> 01:00:48.719
But I think that if we find what we do, each person's own individuality, build on that and allow others a space to build on theirs.
01:00:49.360 --> 01:00:50.000
Very good.
01:00:50.159 --> 01:00:56.559
Well, Natasha Vitamore, you are a fascinating person, pioneer and practitioner, and um thank you.
01:00:56.639 --> 01:00:58.960
It's been a privilege to speak to you today.
01:00:59.280 --> 01:01:00.239
Thank you.
01:01:18.400 --> 01:01:29.199
And if you haven't left a rating, please do, and do visit the futurofieu.co.uk if you'd like to sign up to our newsletter covering all things identity in a digital world.