250: Seven Years, 700 Cholesterol, Zero Plaque: What Dr. Nick Norwitz's Case Report Changes

WEBVTT
00:00:34.999 --> 00:00:36.429
welcome, folks.
00:00:36.609 --> 00:00:48.210
It is Stay Off My Operating Table with Dr. Philip Ovadia, and we are joined today by, first time I've e- I'm ever using this label, my favorite double-degreed provocateur.
00:00:48.210 --> 00:00:48.889
I like that one.
00:00:48.889 --> 00:00:49.039
I think.
00:00:49.260 --> 00:00:49.799
What do you think?
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:50.350
Pretty good?
00:00:50.350 --> 00:00:50.969
I like it.
00:00:51.198 --> 00:00:52.359
Double de- I have a secret.
00:00:52.359 --> 00:00:56.159
So sometimes when I give lectures, after my MD, PhD, I throw in some other letters.
00:00:56.159 --> 00:01:01.489
There's two sets of letters, PGP and PP. No one ever asks what they stand for.
00:01:01.719 --> 00:01:03.859
They're Professional Guinea Pig and Professional Provocateur.
00:01:03.909 --> 00:01:07.618
And I'm just like... I play on the letter thing because everybody just likes tossing letters in the left and right.
00:01:07.618 --> 00:01:13.368
I'm old enough to- So I, I like to play with it I'm old enough to remember when PGP meant Pretty Good Privacy,. Hey, Phil, it's your show.
00:01:13.368 --> 00:01:14.688
Would you like to say something?
00:01:15.639 --> 00:01:16.229
Awesome.
00:01:16.229 --> 00:01:19.308
No, actually today I'm probably just gonna wanna listen.
00:01:19.338 --> 00:01:22.149
Very excited to have Nick Norwitz back on with us.
00:01:22.539 --> 00:01:29.278
When we last checked in with Nick I believe you were maybe just getting ready to start third year of medical school.
00:01:29.748 --> 00:01:31.509
A lot has happened since then.
00:01:31.509 --> 00:01:39.749
And would love to let the audience who hasn't been following maybe catch them up on what you've been up to.
00:01:39.808 --> 00:01:44.249
And we really we'll let everyone behind the curtain a little bit.
00:01:44.278 --> 00:01:55.079
This is one of those breaking episodes that Nick had a case report published just I think it officially published last week, but really just breaking this week.
00:01:55.308 --> 00:01:56.999
So we're recording this on Monday.
00:01:56.999 --> 00:02:03.609
It's coming out tonight at midnight, and really excited to get into that and talk about the implications.
00:02:03.609 --> 00:02:11.028
But yeah, before we get to the, that, Nick, let, how'd the rest of medical school go, and what kind of stuff are you up to now?
00:02:11.618 --> 00:02:19.598
To cut to the chase, or let's say frame this discussion, I'm building off what, how Jack opened it with double-degreed double doctor provocateur.
00:02:19.649 --> 00:02:23.799
The funny thing about me, and people who know me closely, is I'm completely an introvert.
00:02:23.848 --> 00:02:29.899
The idea that Nick would be a public figure in any sense five years ago would've been ridiculous.
00:02:30.408 --> 00:02:49.689
My journey through my own health issues and then medical school really set a fire in my belly, not sh- because I want to be a rabble-rouser, but, I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here with you and your audience that there are things in science and medicine that are just screwed up.
00:02:49.809 --> 00:02:52.668
And far more than we're gonna discuss on this podcast.
00:02:52.978 --> 00:03:03.793
There's a lot I saw behind the scenes, and one of the most oppressive things was a resistance to look at what I thought were important questions in medicine, those that really serve science and the patients.
00:03:04.444 --> 00:03:13.754
And what I kept coming back to is that the questions that were being asked, the data that were being amplified, weren't on the basis of meritocracy, weren't on the basis of importance.
00:03:13.944 --> 00:03:16.963
It was on a basis of how we'd built the system and the incentive structures.
00:03:16.963 --> 00:03:22.324
And when I say that, it's not conspiratorial, it's not pointing fingers at anybody, not even pharma.
00:03:22.353 --> 00:03:32.463
It's just to say we have a system that's built in a very particular way that directs the spotlight of medicine on certain things, and if you just step back and think about it, there have been some abysmal failures.
00:03:32.463 --> 00:03:35.804
I think heart health is one obvious example.
00:03:35.843 --> 00:04:01.343
Irrespective of what your particular belief is, you have to admit, for half a century or so of chasing one, rabbit down a hole, cholesterol, and investing many billions of dollars in it, more than most other fields, we've made remarkable, remarkably abysmal progress, and that needs to be owned by the scientific and medical community to figure out innovative solutions.
00:04:01.783 --> 00:04:19.283
So sometimes things that are, quote-unquote, naturally provocative, like the existence of me as a patient, which shouldn't necessarily piss off people, but seems to, I have no problem amplifying those questions, and if somebody gets ticked off, my rule is ask a question.
00:04:19.613 --> 00:04:21.934
If you don't get a satisfactory answer, keep asking.
00:04:22.244 --> 00:04:25.494
If people get pissed off at you, you're probably asking a really important question.
00:04:25.814 --> 00:04:29.504
So I won't be bullied into submission if I genuinely think a question is important.
00:04:29.884 --> 00:04:38.274
The provocateur nature comes from the fact that asking some questions is perceived as taboo, and that is not how science works if it's a legitimate question.
00:04:38.274 --> 00:04:41.283
So to cut to the chase, I finished up medical school.
00:04:41.634 --> 00:04:53.903
As I was finishing up, a lot of opportunities were falling at my feet in the business world, in the research world, in the public-facing world of public education, and I'm lucky.
00:04:53.903 --> 00:05:01.293
Unlike prior generations like my parents or I guess even you when you were going through training, we now have a very different information ecosystem.
00:05:02.093 --> 00:05:21.194
And my perception is that the internet, social media, the availability of science is creating a democratization with respect to health information and that medicine as a team sport is evolving, and there are gonna be people in my generation who are stepping up as primarily the people who are the educators.
00:05:21.243 --> 00:05:22.683
So that's what I wanna specialize in.
00:05:22.683 --> 00:05:31.194
I'm doing a lot of things, but I'm like, I wanna devote my life to reading data, communicating it, more so than being a boots-on-the-ground clinician, which is also incredibly important.
00:05:31.194 --> 00:05:32.324
That's why I say team sport.
00:05:32.894 --> 00:05:34.933
It's not that I've lost any respect for the profession.
00:05:34.963 --> 00:05:36.144
It's remarkably admirable.
00:05:36.144 --> 00:05:41.293
The people in my life who are physicians, my parents, my siblings are in medical school, my girlfriend's a surgeon.
00:05:41.685 --> 00:06:04.694
What they do is nothing short of heroic, and I find myself just with a different skill set and different passions that lends itself to talking to people, educating people, yes, in certain circumstances provoking Because, and this is the last thing I'll say before I'll shut up- You can speak to this I'm sure, Dr. Ovadia, is that like in a medical system, especially for people who are lower on the totem pole, you just have to stay in your lane.
00:06:05.404 --> 00:06:10.384
So even if something's interesting, even if something's important to the patient, you just have to suck it up, stay in your lane, bite your lip.
00:06:10.454 --> 00:06:12.714
And I'm, first of all, not good at that.
00:06:13.435 --> 00:06:23.805
So long story short is I didn't even apply to residency, and ended up going down an alternate path with research, education, and I will be building some things, probably including a telemedicine company.
00:06:24.204 --> 00:06:25.584
But it's not gonna be a conventional route.
00:06:25.985 --> 00:06:30.324
I could always go back to residency if I want, but at the end of medical school I decided not to apply and do something else.
00:06:30.615 --> 00:06:33.625
So now I find myself here.
00:06:33.654 --> 00:06:38.305
Actually, the room we're standing in, I keep on lying, is gonna be my new studio, so I have to build it out.
00:06:38.344 --> 00:06:43.714
But I got, I bought a property and I'm gonna be upgrading the content game, probably starting a podcast.
00:06:43.714 --> 00:06:49.435
Just getting more bells and whistles than recording in my medical school dorm, which has been, Oh historically the game.
00:06:49.555 --> 00:06:50.584
So leveling up.
00:06:50.584 --> 00:06:52.545
I'm gonna miss the dorm room, Nick.
00:06:53.534 --> 00:06:53.675
Oh, geez.
00:06:53.675 --> 00:06:58.754
I'll always have a little me flare, childish goofiness, even when I'm 60.
00:06:58.985 --> 00:07:00.724
But time to level up, and I'm excited about it.
00:07:01.534 --> 00:07:14.784
Now, one of the- Anyway... things I think it's really important that people who don't know who you are know about you, you described yourself as your existence as a patient should trigger some questions.
00:07:15.343 --> 00:07:26.045
Real quickly if you would, please, for those who haven't followed you, explain why your mere existence as a patient is offensive.
00:07:26.985 --> 00:07:27.574
Yeah.
00:07:27.604 --> 00:07:31.063
That is a multi- multifaceted answer because it's actually a pattern.
00:07:31.303 --> 00:07:43.873
It's been a pattern where I was the patient who walked into the doctor's office, and there's a saying in medicine, if you hear hoof beats, look for horses, not zebras, which is the idea that, you want the most common explanation's probably right.
00:07:43.873 --> 00:07:51.123
The issue is if you have a zebra that walks in, you have to look and see the zebra, and it seems like that doesn't happen.
00:07:51.123 --> 00:07:55.683
And the fact of the matter is most of us aren't the population average.
00:07:55.923 --> 00:07:57.584
We're different in some way, shape, or form.
00:07:57.584 --> 00:08:08.805
So what I was finding again and again through my health journeys I could say, is I'd walk in and I wouldn't get critical thought about what made me unique as a patient, and then I wouldn't get optimal care.
00:08:08.834 --> 00:08:13.104
And I found myself, even as a kid, like having to think through this by myself.
00:08:13.104 --> 00:08:19.144
In fact, the first paper I ever wrote was a case report on I had ended up with a weird bone condition, and I thought they misdiagnosed me.
00:08:19.144 --> 00:08:20.694
I was like 20 at the time.
00:08:21.063 --> 00:08:28.754
And I'm like, "This does not make sense. Your diagnosis doesn't make sense, so I'm gonna write a paper on it." So I have more, background and resources to do that kind of thing, but that happened again and again.
00:08:28.754 --> 00:08:36.004
And most recently, and maybe most pertinent and interesting to your audience was- my cholesterol story, where I had pretty bad inflammatory bowel disease.
00:08:36.004 --> 00:08:37.305
I went on a ketogenic diet.
00:08:37.335 --> 00:08:39.144
It treated the inflammatory bowel disease.
00:08:39.185 --> 00:08:41.254
I got my life back, but my cholesterol went through the roof.
00:08:41.644 --> 00:08:44.154
And I walked in, and I got the rule book thrown at me.
00:08:44.305 --> 00:08:53.925
You fit here in the algorithm, so here's what we're gonna do." Even though I knew the algorithm was built on people who were not like me, and I kept on trying to enforce that.
00:08:53.925 --> 00:08:57.545
This is what makes me different, this is what makes me different, so can't we think about my case as an individual?
00:08:57.545 --> 00:09:03.295
Which is what medicine is, it's treating the individual in front of you, and I think that sometimes gets lost.
00:09:03.965 --> 00:09:10.165
So- ... it makes people very uncomfortable to see somebody walk in, again, focusing on cholesterol, with my cholesterol profile.
00:09:10.265 --> 00:09:24.825
My total cholesterol has historically been over 700, my LDL in the high 500s, and that just s- sets alarm bells off, because there's no point of reference for a patient like that other than some very rare genetic conditions which I do not have.
00:09:25.785 --> 00:09:32.395
So you end up in a position where, yeah, your existence is a challenge.
00:09:32.395 --> 00:09:33.585
A refutation.
00:09:34.435 --> 00:09:43.725
You're exposing a gap in knowledge, and when you push on that button, especially when you choose to do so publicly, and I won't say whether or not that was a smart thing to do.
00:09:43.725 --> 00:09:44.995
The fact of the matter is I did it.
00:09:45.865 --> 00:09:50.835
I've been public about my health background and who I am as a patient, a cholesterol patient, what's happening to me.
00:09:50.835 --> 00:10:01.325
So when you then amplify your story, it takes that uncomfortable cognitive dissonance and scales it, because it's a threat- ... to conventional models.
00:10:01.905 --> 00:10:03.055
I wanna pause and focus on this.
00:10:03.055 --> 00:10:06.555
People talk about whether or not LDL is causal, how important it is.
00:10:07.004 --> 00:10:13.655
The fact of the matter is the way we think and treat cholesterol is almost like it is the disease.
00:10:13.685 --> 00:10:14.945
Almost like it is heart disease.
00:10:15.325 --> 00:10:29.265
So if you have a patient with astronomically high cholesterol, where the expectation is their heart is gonna be clogged, up with plaque, and they're gonna be having heart attacks by, if you use the reference population, homozygous FH, before they turn age 10.
00:10:29.725 --> 00:10:39.865
And then that patient, and this is a spoiler alert to the case report, ends up having absolutely no plaque whatsoever, not soft, not calcified, nothing, zero millimeters cubed, that spits in the face of the conventional model.
00:10:39.865 --> 00:10:46.725
Now, there's always mental acrobatics like, "Oh it's an outlier." The fact of the matter is we learn the most from studying outliers.
00:10:46.725 --> 00:10:48.055
That is not a sufficient explanation.
00:10:48.055 --> 00:10:53.685
You have to say, "Okay why does this person break the rule? Like, why am I the exception?" It's not magic.
00:10:54.634 --> 00:10:57.515
There's physiology there, and what is the unique physiology?
00:10:57.515 --> 00:11:06.985
The fact of the matter is I'm not alone, but the point is even one case, one extraordinary case that butts against the rule deserves attention and discussion.
00:11:07.065 --> 00:11:11.925
So that's what I mean by my existence is an offense, and implicitly provocative.
00:11:12.915 --> 00:11:16.265
And what you started off talking about, right?
00:11:16.305 --> 00:11:20.754
Is something that I think is so important and doesn't get recognized.
00:11:21.085 --> 00:11:27.825
Because it would be one thing if- managing cholesterol was truly fixing heart disease, right?
00:11:27.855 --> 00:11:33.494
And then, okay, maybe there's this outlier that, he can have high cholesterol and doesn't have heart disease.
00:11:33.884 --> 00:11:45.164
But, we can't even talk about in medicine, it doesn't get talked about in medicine, that fixing heart... fixing cholesterol is not fixing heart disease, right?
00:11:45.164 --> 00:11:48.334
And, I- I've said it a few times on this program, right?
00:11:48.644 --> 00:12:03.174
When I was figuring out, 25 years ago what area of surgery I wanted to specialize in, and I told my mentors I wanted to go into heart surgery, they told me I was an idiot and I shouldn't do that because there's gonna be nothing left for us to do.
00:12:03.595 --> 00:12:05.095
We figured out heart disease.
00:12:05.095 --> 00:12:07.345
We have these miracle m- medications.
00:12:07.533 --> 00:12:12.134
We lower cholesterol and heart disease is done, and you're gonna have no job.
00:12:12.514 --> 00:12:32.194
And here I am 25 years later, and there is a massive shortage of heart surgeons that we cannot... there aren't enough surgeons to go around and do the amount of surgery, and no one is stepping back, not the American Heart Association, not, any of the, leading health organizations.
00:12:32.194 --> 00:12:41.414
No one is stepping back and saying, "What did we miss?" Why isn't heart disease going away like it should if it was all about cholesterol?
00:12:42.134 --> 00:12:42.244
Yeah.
00:12:42.244 --> 00:12:48.524
I mean, there are a few things I really want to dig into, nuances that I think people overlook, because you're 100% right.
00:12:48.824 --> 00:12:56.624
Sometimes I feel like we're playing cholesterol Uno, where it's oh, there's still cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis in people with an LDL of 55.
00:12:56.624 --> 00:13:01.024
So m- like, you just need to get it to 40 or 30, and then it's just like we're trying to get to zero, basically.
00:13:01.334 --> 00:13:07.674
And there's always an excuse for, why the LDL cholesterol is a problem, why lower is better, et cetera, et cetera.
00:13:08.004 --> 00:13:14.064
And I think what's interesting to observe is how people get hung up on particular concepts and use them as an excuse.
00:13:14.064 --> 00:13:18.674
So I'll lean into one word that I know you both have heard a lot, which is causality.
00:13:19.704 --> 00:13:27.254
I hate causality because every time causality comes up, it's conflated with importance.
00:13:27.783 --> 00:13:35.975
We hear people talk about, like Peter Attia was on Huberman, and he was like,"I'm obsessed with causality." And I'm like, you can have a causal variable that is actually not important.
00:13:35.975 --> 00:13:38.685
It's part of the domino chain, but it doesn't mean you need to treat it.
00:13:39.165 --> 00:13:42.884
And very importantly, it doesn't mean treating it's a good thing.
00:13:43.215 --> 00:14:05.105
In fact, one of, and I will use Peter again for his own analogy, an analogy he used early on when he had his podcast with Dave Feldman, was to describe the relationship between LDL cholesterol and atherosclerosis as oxygen and fire, since oxygen- is necessary and causal for a fire, which is hilarious because what happens if you lower oxygen more and more?
00:14:05.675 --> 00:14:10.715
The chance of me spontaneously combusting into flames does go down.
00:14:11.285 --> 00:14:14.055
But you'd also suffocate and die if you hit zero oxygen.
00:14:14.325 --> 00:14:22.185
Now, obviously that's an extreme analogy, but you could use many analogies, like a biological male, their equipment being causal for certain STDs.
00:14:22.185 --> 00:14:24.134
Do you want to remove that causal variable?
00:14:24.435 --> 00:14:27.085
I would argue that would cause more harm than good.
00:14:27.305 --> 00:14:37.475
So this idea of causality that always gets brought up with the Mendelian randomization, I'm like, it misses the point completely, because it doesn't actually mean the treatment is actually going to have the benefit.
00:14:37.634 --> 00:14:45.455
And even worse than that, or not worse than that, but compounding on that, th- there are, like, things that then seem like, oh, the trump card.
00:14:45.455 --> 00:14:48.465
Oh, in these populations statins improve cardiovascular outcomes.
00:14:48.465 --> 00:14:59.415
But if you actually look at some of those studies and then do the meta-analysis to see, okay when statins improve cardiovascular mortality, like in metabolically sick populations, is there an association with how much they lower LDL?
00:14:59.875 --> 00:15:03.945
And the R squared ends up being like 0.0 to 0.1, so basically no relationship.
00:15:03.945 --> 00:15:14.445
So maybe there's something there, but it's being misattributed to a reductions in LDL when maybe the effect is, oh, statins are improving endothelial function in people with high baseline inflammation who are metabolically unhealthy.
00:15:15.165 --> 00:15:16.085
We can go down the rabbit hole.
00:15:16.085 --> 00:15:31.525
The point is not that LDL and ApoB aren't important at all or aren't causal at all, but I think it's really hard to make an argument that they deserve all the oxygen they're getting.
00:15:31.835 --> 00:15:33.125
They're a small side player.
00:15:33.125 --> 00:15:35.995
In the forest of cardiovascular disease, they're a stupid little shrub.
00:15:36.754 --> 00:15:46.384
So why are we spending billions of dollars and all our attention on the stupid little shrub, is my provocative presentation.
00:15:46.645 --> 00:15:53.375
Yeah I could hazard a guess, and it might be that we have a pill that will affect the number when we measure it.
00:15:54.155 --> 00:15:57.115
Oh, I think that is- That is the answer.
00:15:57.425 --> 00:15:58.935
But it's actually more sinister than that.
00:15:58.985 --> 00:15:59.315
Oh, God.
00:15:59.315 --> 00:15:59.795
Not sinister.
00:15:59.795 --> 00:16:03.275
No, sinister's not the right word, because sinister implies malintent.
00:16:04.705 --> 00:16:14.555
It's more problematic than that- There we go ... because I think people really buy in to the fact that we have a pill, this is an actionable item, and you can do something and help someone.
00:16:14.795 --> 00:16:17.295
There's a very tempting story.
00:16:17.705 --> 00:16:26.025
The issue with that story is to provide proper informed care, the patient and the doctor need to be informed.
00:16:26.055 --> 00:16:32.865
So what if you have an ecosystem that amplifies and over-exaggerates the benefits and suppresses the harms?
00:16:33.245 --> 00:16:35.815
And we have this ecosystem, and I see it again and again.
00:16:35.815 --> 00:16:37.835
So for example, here are just facts.
00:16:38.615 --> 00:16:51.394
One of the most popular statins of all time, like atorvastatin, is known to suppress GLP-1 levels in human controlled trials, which is GLP-1 being now one of the most sexy hormones of the era, you'd think that would be something that gets a little bit of attention.
00:16:52.004 --> 00:16:52.434
None.
00:16:53.455 --> 00:16:56.925
When I found that study I walked around asking cardiologists if they'd ever heard about it.
00:16:56.925 --> 00:16:57.264
No.
00:16:58.089 --> 00:17:07.499
It's not because they were malicious and trying to avoid it, it's just that there was no incentive to amplify those data, which clearly had serious potential implications for health.
00:17:07.848 --> 00:17:10.078
Or another example, women.
00:17:11.439 --> 00:17:14.818
I did not learn in medical school that women are more likely to be harmed by statins than men.
00:17:14.868 --> 00:17:24.308
Apparently, it's a very well-documented finding, and the reason is also known, more or less, which has to do with change- differences in sex chromosomes.
00:18:00.188 --> 00:18:08.368
So women have two sex chromosomes, and therefore have a different dose of certain genes, and this ends up interacting with statins, actually through omega-3 pathways.
00:18:08.858 --> 00:18:11.038
In fact, these studies provide solutions.
00:18:11.038 --> 00:18:14.779
In women you can just give an omega-3 and it can help with blood sugar increases on statins.
00:18:15.108 --> 00:18:16.219
All that's besides the point.
00:18:16.219 --> 00:18:30.788
The point is there are these signals for both harms, and then also solutions to those harms that are potentially very clinically important, but they don't get elevated because there's no business model around them, to your point, Jack.
00:18:31.448 --> 00:18:32.479
And I think that's a huge problem.
00:18:34.698 --> 00:18:48.168
At this point, what do you think the average doctor needs to do differently when considering things like, the zebras, the b- the black swans, right?
00:18:48.209 --> 00:19:01.898
A case like yours and again, to get to the punchline your case report that was just published, Seven Years of 700 Cholesterol Without Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Lean Mass Hyper-Responder Case Report.
00:19:01.898 --> 00:19:08.709
And we'll have the link to the publication and to a video of you discussing it in all the show notes.
00:19:09.269 --> 00:19:13.338
But, the average doctor is just trying to get through their day, right?
00:19:13.338 --> 00:19:18.328
And here comes Nick into the office saying, "Yes, my cholesterol's 700.
00:19:18.608 --> 00:19:27.178
Yes, every algorithm, leading society across the world says that's something that needs to be treated, emergently.
00:19:27.778 --> 00:19:46.250
And here I am, having had this for a long period of time without any problems related to it that anyone can document now using the best imaging we have." To be quite frank the average doctor, that, that hurts their brain, and they don't want to think this much about it.
00:19:46.298 --> 00:19:48.519
And where do we go from here?
00:19:48.519 --> 00:20:01.658
What are your thoughts now, having trained, gone through medical school and all of this, and having experienced it as a patient, as to the doctors that are out there listening, how they start to integrate this into their lives?
00:20:02.019 --> 00:20:02.398
Yeah.
00:20:03.088 --> 00:20:12.433
That is a very good question, because I'm trying not to assume that every clinician will have access to, all the data in my brain, because now I specialize in reading all these papers.
00:20:12.834 --> 00:20:19.134
And so you're gonna have to make a hard call based on something you pr- might not have seen before or might not have learned about.
00:20:19.864 --> 00:20:20.793
So where do you start?
00:20:21.094 --> 00:20:29.364
I think step one is a little bit of introspection about what you assume to be the default safe path.
00:20:30.003 --> 00:20:42.963
Because the interesting thing is the default assumption is that e- even if it's been a long time, better part of a decade, very high cholesterol, there's no plaque, still hedge your bets, take the statin, just in case.
00:20:43.573 --> 00:20:48.403
So the default is the safe thing is to take the powerful pharmaceutical that also has side effects.
00:20:49.073 --> 00:20:51.783
Is that reasonably the default safe assumption?
00:20:51.823 --> 00:20:53.584
I would argue probably no.
00:20:54.203 --> 00:20:59.223
That doesn't mean it's not a defensible path, and that's one of the things is in these situations there are multiple defensible paths.
00:20:59.854 --> 00:21:10.313
So step one is to interrogate are your assumptions about what the safe path is fair, should that actually be the default, or should you be going with an alternative default?
00:21:10.903 --> 00:21:13.263
And then thinking about the whole system.
00:21:14.463 --> 00:21:21.334
So for example, after my seven-year scan, and I did this intentionally after, I considered restarting ezetimibe.
00:21:22.213 --> 00:21:26.273
Now, somebody might be asking, okay, wait, ezetimibe is another cholesterol-lowering drug.
00:21:26.273 --> 00:21:26.903
It's not a statin.
00:21:26.903 --> 00:21:34.334
But why now if you are stipulating that you don't have high cardiovascular risk, you have no plaque, would you take a cholesterol-lowering med?
00:21:35.063 --> 00:21:48.463
And this is where we genuinely need open-mindedness on both sides because even that idea, be it a statin, ezetimibe, something else, a quote unquote cholesterol-lowering med is a very narrow scope.
00:21:48.834 --> 00:21:58.663
We have named it a cholesterol-lowering med because of what we care about tracking, but the fact is biology and physiology doesn't give a crap what we name things.
00:21:59.183 --> 00:22:02.153
So often things have off-label use.
00:22:02.183 --> 00:22:08.354
Actually, a lot of medications are used off label for other indications, and I happened to come across some data that I can send you now.
00:22:08.384 --> 00:22:17.763
I will caveat it's very preliminary early data, but nevertheless was intriguing to me that ezetimibe might have potential neuroprotective effects completely independent of cholesterol.
00:22:17.763 --> 00:22:18.723
Not a cholesterol story.
00:22:18.753 --> 00:22:25.663
It goes into the brain and can interrupt interaction between two proteins that might otherwise increase risk for Alzheimer's, which is important to me.
00:22:26.173 --> 00:22:35.403
Based on the safety profile and even those early data with all their caveats, I'm like, the risk-benefit analysis in me, if I tolerate it, probably is helpful for brain purposes.
00:22:36.253 --> 00:22:47.043
The reason I present that is because, from the clinical point of view, just taking a step back and thinking, look, whether I'm a cardiologist or a primary care clinician, there's a whole person in front of me.
00:22:47.773 --> 00:22:51.513
What are the true risks and benefits of every option?
00:22:52.273 --> 00:22:53.673
And then, what does the patient care about?
00:22:53.713 --> 00:22:55.283
I care a lot about Alzheimer's disease.
00:22:55.753 --> 00:22:56.783
And then having that discussion.
00:22:56.864 --> 00:22:58.233
I mean, that's patient-centered medicine.
00:22:58.233 --> 00:23:04.354
So literally list out pros and cons, all that you know about, try to find those that you might not.
00:23:04.818 --> 00:23:08.219
And then decide is this something worth trying, and then collect data, right?
00:23:08.469 --> 00:23:11.068
It's really about what the patient is willing to try out.
00:23:11.408 --> 00:23:20.158
But me, you know me like do- I like doing experiments, sometimes it's maybe you're worried about a side effect, a temporary one, muscle pains, like you could just try and see what happens.
00:23:20.229 --> 00:23:22.108
It's not a signature you're signing up for life.
00:23:22.108 --> 00:23:40.668
You can be like, "I'm gonna try this, see what it does to my overall metabolic profile, my lipids, how I feel, and then reevaluate." So I think the difficult thing is approaching this with acknowledgement of the unknown, and that you might revise your decision as more information arises.
00:23:40.668 --> 00:23:49.778
But I think starting with imaging studies, starting with figuring out what your default assumption is as to what is the conservative safe path and whether that's correct, and then looking at the whole person.
00:23:50.868 --> 00:24:00.568
There's no good algorithm because humans are a web, and I hate when s- people try to like fit humans down a linear algorithm because we are a complex web.
00:24:00.568 --> 00:24:05.009
So those al- like linear algorithms don't often work well at the individual level.
00:24:05.398 --> 00:24:07.068
And I know I'm talking a lot.
00:24:07.388 --> 00:24:07.658
No.
00:24:07.658 --> 00:24:25.388
But I... And one last thing I wanna say, because I often get kickback from senior clinicians where they're like, "Know your place. You don't have my 20 years of clinical experience." And I wanna respect and also push back hard on that point, because clinical experience can be amazing.
00:24:25.668 --> 00:24:34.618
It can give you intuition for things that you can't gain through textbooks, but it's a double-edged sword because it also is like just, confirmation bias.
00:24:34.938 --> 00:24:36.578
Sometimes it is just confirmation bias.
00:24:36.769 --> 00:24:44.448
Just because somebody sits with patients over the course of decades and has dominion over a prescription pad does not mean they're actually practicing good medicine.
00:24:45.028 --> 00:24:48.229
In fact, they might have a tendency to be cemented in an idea that is suboptimal.
00:24:48.848 --> 00:24:56.178
So clinical experience can have value, but it is not in and of itself sufficient to discredit critical thinking.
00:24:56.568 --> 00:24:58.038
There is a... I put a post up the other day.
00:24:58.078 --> 00:25:04.388
You know that like plaque, that meme that's "Don't for- don't mistake your Google search for my medical degree"?
00:25:04.818 --> 00:25:10.848
I have a variation that is, "Don't confuse your prescription pad for critical thinking," 'cause it's true.
00:25:10.979 --> 00:25:19.969
It's like there's a tendency to be like I'm experienced." What is experience truly worth is a larger question, and I think that is a bit of a double-edged sword.
00:25:21.019 --> 00:25:32.418
Yeah, I mean, it's a big blind spot that I think a lot of doctors have in that we, whi- which zebras will we pay attention to, I guess, is what I'm getting at, right?
00:25:32.418 --> 00:25:37.098
Because, li- listen, if you have a heart attack, five years from now, right?
00:25:37.578 --> 00:25:49.318
Every cardiologist, every doctor, all the AHA and all of them are gonna come out of the woodwork and say of course-" Nick had a heart attack because he had a cholesterol level of 700 and he didn't take a statin, right?
00:25:49.538 --> 00:25:51.028
He didn't lower his cholesterol.
00:25:51.519 --> 00:26:02.308
And yet the m- average cardiologist if you ask them"How many of your patients on these medications have heart attacks," right?
00:26:02.378 --> 00:26:06.578
I think they're going to vastly underestimate that number, right?
00:26:06.648 --> 00:26:14.499
And they tend to think the ones that did, it's because they weren't really... they didn't start soon enough," or, "They weren't really taking the medicine," right?
00:26:14.499 --> 00:26:15.719
"They were non-compliant," right?
00:26:15.719 --> 00:26:21.628
We blame all of this stuff and we just don't realize the shortcomings of these algorithms.
00:26:21.658 --> 00:26:26.759
What you said earlier, I think is one of the most important things that we have forgotten in medicine.
00:26:27.168 --> 00:26:39.938
Humans are incredibly complex, and the combination of the complexities within each individual human is still way beyond our capacity to, conceive and compute, right?
00:26:39.938 --> 00:26:43.198
Even with all the stuff we have available to us today.
00:26:43.229 --> 00:26:43.288
Yeah.
00:26:43.668 --> 00:27:00.489
And to say that we're gonna, be able to take the vast majority of people on whatever topic you wanna pick and put them into an algorithm i- is really a kind of a foolhardy pursuit, and I think it's been problematic the more that we have tried to do that in medicine.
00:27:01.078 --> 00:27:01.348
Yeah.
00:27:01.808 --> 00:27:05.948
And, you're speaking to confirmation bias, and it's so much worse than I think people realize.
00:27:06.368 --> 00:27:10.068
Speaking of case reports, so we're f- we're, comparing, apples to apples here.
00:27:10.688 --> 00:27:14.408
I don't know if you remember, I think it was a couple of years ago, that case report in Circulation.
00:27:14.788 --> 00:27:23.818
It was entitled, I remember the title was Rapid Progression of Coronary Artery Disease After Stopping a Statin and Starting a Ketogenic Diet in a Lean Mass Hyper-Responder.
00:27:24.938 --> 00:27:30.348
And that, I'm sure, gets much more play in academia because just like you said, like that's the cautionary tale.
00:27:30.348 --> 00:27:34.098
Whoa, lean mass hyper-responder, he stopped his statin, he went keto, now he had a heart attack.
00:27:34.269 --> 00:27:34.648
Bummer.
00:27:35.729 --> 00:27:42.918
I will tell you, and people can look this up, Google the name I, the title I just wrote the case report wasn't only sloppy, it was a lie.
00:27:43.418 --> 00:27:45.198
It was a- ... completely bold-faced lie.
00:27:45.538 --> 00:27:51.408
And Circulation, which is a major cardiology journal, accepted it, and then it was presented at an American Heart Association conference.
00:27:51.408 --> 00:27:57.128
So what actually happened in this case, first of all, didn't meet lean mass hyper-responder criteria, so they're labeling him incorrectly.
00:27:57.838 --> 00:28:11.158
S- But then, more appallingly, the actual patient history was the guy, before ever trying a ketogenic diet, had to go into the operating room, probably to have a stent put in, a percutaneous intervention.
00:28:11.158 --> 00:28:16.469
I'm not sure exactly what they did, but presumably he had a stent put in his left anterior descending artery because it was all clogged.
00:28:17.128 --> 00:28:24.038
While they were in his heart, they're like, "Oh look, his other artery, his right coronary, is mostly clogged or partially clogged." There was moderate blockage.
00:28:24.378 --> 00:28:26.408
"Okay, so we'll stent up in the one artery.
00:28:26.408 --> 00:28:32.229
We'll send him on his merry way with some treatment, some statins, along with other meds." Then multiple years pass.
00:28:32.898 --> 00:28:37.328
They're not doing follow-up imaging during these multiple years, and he's presumably on his medication.
00:28:38.188 --> 00:28:45.108
Then what happens is he stops his statin, starts a ketogenic diet, and then has a basically a heart attack, a STEMI.
00:28:45.989 --> 00:28:48.719
They did not say how long he was on keto.
00:28:49.009 --> 00:28:52.378
They did not say what the ketogenic diet was.
00:28:52.578 --> 00:29:02.739
This literally could be... And they o- they omitted time points and durations in a way that made it im- impossible to figure out the timeline, almost like it seemed almost intentional.
00:29:02.989 --> 00:29:09.778
So there's a serious possibility here that the case was something like dude was eating a standard American diet, nearly had a heart attack.
00:29:10.118 --> 00:29:12.858
They did procedure, put in a stent, gave statins.
00:29:12.858 --> 00:29:14.128
The other artery was already clogged.
00:29:14.128 --> 00:29:20.239
He went off for a couple of years, and then, he stopped taking a statin for a week, and during that week, he ate a little bit more bacon with his toast.
00:29:20.239 --> 00:29:22.148
And we'll call it keto and just blame it all on the keto.
00:29:22.318 --> 00:29:24.519
Oh, by the way, let's call him a lean mass hyper-responder for good measure.
00:29:24.878 --> 00:29:25.868
It was a complete lie.
00:29:26.479 --> 00:29:31.908
It was a bold-faced lie, and that kind of stuff passes, and I'll tell you it is not a one-off.
00:29:32.928 --> 00:30:01.239
So this idea that we're actually good at, identifying what, as you said, what zebras to focus on and what outliers we can learn from, there are grotesque double standards, and there's always mental gymnastics to explain why the current model is defensible despite, at a population level, an abysmal failure- Yeah of cardiology at actually curing, treating, or making heart disease a rarity, which it should be by now.
00:30:04.068 --> 00:30:05.158
Oh my goodness.
00:30:06.178 --> 00:30:06.388
Oh.
00:30:06.469 --> 00:30:12.138
And to I mean, to properly, I think, bring focus to why this is such an important question, right?
00:30:12.138 --> 00:30:17.928
'Cause, many people might hear your story, Nick, and just say why don't you go off the diet," right?
00:30:17.959 --> 00:30:23.858
Or, "Why don't you just, take the medication to lower your cholesterol while you're on the diet," right?
00:30:24.298 --> 00:30:29.469
And, I think again what gets lost is the unbelievable benefits, right?
00:30:29.469 --> 00:30:32.828
That you and many others have gotten from this, right?
00:30:32.828 --> 00:30:37.878
This wasn't like you just wanted to lose a few pounds, so you went on a ketogenic diet, right?
00:30:37.878 --> 00:30:43.328
And your cholesterol went up, and now you're just being sort of a difficult person, right?
00:30:43.798 --> 00:30:46.568
You had a serious life-threatening condition, right?
00:30:46.568 --> 00:30:52.688
If I remember correctly, you were literally placed on hospice care because of this condition.
00:30:53.038 --> 00:30:54.519
And- I was in a PAL care ward.
00:30:54.668 --> 00:30:54.818
PAL care.
00:30:54.818 --> 00:30:55.538
I wasn't quite hospice.
00:30:55.538 --> 00:30:57.068
I wasn't six months to live, but I was sick.
00:30:57.068 --> 00:30:57.318
Yeah.
00:30:57.698 --> 00:31:00.578
And this is the only thing that has fixed it, right?
00:31:00.578 --> 00:31:09.568
You had tried all of the traditional medicines and stuff to address your ulcerative colitis and the ketogenic diet is literally the only thing that has fixed it.
00:31:09.903 --> 00:31:13.594
And so going off this diet isn't really an option for you.
00:31:14.043 --> 00:31:15.513
Not a reasonable one, no.
00:31:15.543 --> 00:31:15.913
Yeah.
00:31:16.124 --> 00:31:17.604
You're not unique in that.
00:31:17.693 --> 00:31:25.124
We have hundreds of thousands of people at this point, in the low carb community who have similar stories to you.
00:31:25.153 --> 00:31:33.844
They have very serious medical issues, whether it's diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, s- neuropsychiatric conditions, right?
00:31:33.844 --> 00:31:36.874
That only respond well to this diet.
00:31:37.193 --> 00:31:44.263
And so to dismiss the diet and say... A- and this again, is exactly what the mainstream system is trying to do.
00:31:44.594 --> 00:31:49.023
This isn't about individual cases of, this isn't valid, right?
00:31:49.023 --> 00:32:02.323
They are trying to say that the ketogenic diet is not a valid dietary approach for people because some people see increased cholesterol when they go on these diets.
00:32:02.834 --> 00:32:03.023
Yeah.
00:32:03.073 --> 00:32:09.473
It's a very reductionistic point of view and honestly, not supported by data, unless you consider lies and circulation data.
00:32:10.533 --> 00:32:26.004
One other thing I wanna point out- Yeah ... if in case it went over people's heads with respect to my own case, whether or not people like me or don't like me, and there are definitely a lot of people who aren't fans, and I appreciate them just as much, but I don't think anybody thinks I'm stupid.
00:32:27.413 --> 00:32:31.294
And no- people I think are aware that I come from a, like a medical background.
00:32:31.663 --> 00:32:34.924
Not only having, a medical degree myself, but my parents have medical degrees.
00:32:34.924 --> 00:32:36.244
I come from a family of doctors.
00:32:36.323 --> 00:32:42.524
So with that in mind, take my case, 700 cholesterol, seven years, no plaque.
00:32:44.213 --> 00:33:05.914
It's one thing to say, "Oh, it's just N equals one." And again, there are more people like me, but bear in mind this isn't a matter of I had a magic eight ball, and seven years ago, I'm like, "I know how this is gonna turn out. Let me wait and then I'll amplify the story as N equals one." This was something I bet on prospectively, because back when I was 23, there was a choice.
00:33:06.503 --> 00:33:29.805
There was a choice of take the medication or don't take the medication, and I made a choice and was bold enough to make a bet while knowing that decades of cardiology, quote unquote, wisdom built by people with far more clinical experience than me said otherwise.
00:33:30.464 --> 00:33:32.394
But I made that bet, and I was right.
00:33:33.404 --> 00:33:38.374
So was I just incredibly lucky, or did I maybe have an idea that is legitimate?
00:33:39.313 --> 00:33:43.743
And I, I ask that as a, not just a rhetorical question, but something to seriously ponder.
00:33:44.413 --> 00:33:45.293
Maybe I was lucky.
00:33:45.663 --> 00:33:50.923
Maybe 99 times in alternate universes out of 100 alternate universes, I died.
00:33:51.864 --> 00:33:52.703
I don't think that's the case.
00:33:53.043 --> 00:33:57.438
I think there's something here and I think that is at least a discussion worth having.
00:33:57.749 --> 00:34:05.588
Sadly, as you probably well know, very few of the critics are willing to actually have a long-form discussion.
00:34:05.588 --> 00:34:05.729
Yeah.
00:34:06.209 --> 00:34:08.009
Make some snarky remark and then run away.
00:34:08.579 --> 00:34:08.778
Yeah.
00:34:09.528 --> 00:34:11.719
And I think that is also telling.
00:34:12.259 --> 00:34:25.838
There's a, an old saying that has hung around for thousands of years because it carries so much truth with it, where there's smoke, there's fire.
00:34:26.229 --> 00:34:46.208
And what we are seeing week after week for 250 episodes, we've had interviews with healthcare professionals and normal patients whose lived experience, I'm gonna use that phrase even though I hate it, contradicts official medical dogma.
00:34:47.078 --> 00:34:58.338
And the rational response when you walk into your house and there's smoke pouring out of every window is to go look for the fire.
00:34:59.608 --> 00:35:23.138
And what I've, what I have seen in my own experience and the experience of my family, and the sp- experience of the hundreds of people that have been affected by the work that we're doing here, is the fire and smoke analogy may be a little misleading but if, for example, statins did what they told us they'd do 30 years ago, then Phil wouldn't have a job.
00:35:25.458 --> 00:35:25.908
Yeah.
00:35:26.038 --> 00:35:34.558
I mean, the only advantage really- And I'm not a medical professional but I can add one and one together and I'll come up with two almost every time.
00:35:34.998 --> 00:35:42.988
If statins actually were solving the s- the root problem, then the root problem would go away.
00:35:44.318 --> 00:35:49.048
And not only has it not gone away, it's worse than it's ever been.
00:35:51.028 --> 00:35:51.818
In some senses.
00:35:51.818 --> 00:35:57.978
In some sense, I mean, I think I think, you can correct me if I'm wrong, mor- mortality's gone down, but that again is because of emergency medicine.
00:35:58.498 --> 00:36:18.618
If you have a heart attack, we're much better at not letting you die in the moment, but in terms of actual morbidity and overall burden of who has cardiovascular disease, yeah, over time, LDL levels have been dropping more and more as we come up with more and more ways to plummet it down, and people still get heart disease because the landscape has changed.
00:36:18.618 --> 00:36:20.708
There's more people with obesity, metabolic syndrome.
00:36:20.708 --> 00:36:22.148
Now, you know what will be really interesting?
00:36:23.288 --> 00:36:39.528
With the advent of GLP-1s and their evolutions, and I think, a focus now on adiposity, insulin sensitivity, I think we're gonna see a changing landscape in what we focus on probably as a function of that, which isn't necessarily bad.
00:36:39.858 --> 00:36:45.463
I think a large question that I don't have an answer to is- You know we talked earlier about incentive structures.
00:36:45.903 --> 00:36:46.143
Yeah.
00:36:46.173 --> 00:36:49.483
How the incentive structures of the system are misaligned with what's best for patients.
00:36:50.383 --> 00:36:58.143
Th- the question that, is in my mind is not like we're gonna let altruism rule the day,'cause i- in, in a capitalist economy it's not going to.
00:36:58.913 --> 00:37:06.873
The question then becomes how do we create a system where the incentive structures, the financial, business, economic incentive structures of the system are aligned with what's best for patients?
00:37:07.433 --> 00:37:13.073
Now, is it... It's possible that the advent of GLP-1s and similar drugs are just gonna do that by serendipity at least temporarily.
00:37:13.613 --> 00:37:14.223
Maybe.
00:37:14.313 --> 00:37:16.313
And if so, fantastic for a generation.
00:37:16.923 --> 00:37:22.483
But how do we keep that consistent where the incentive structure's parallel interests the patients?
00:37:23.163 --> 00:37:24.753
How do we generate that system?
00:37:24.753 --> 00:37:29.003
Because that would be a system that is really robust in improving individual healthcare.
00:37:29.033 --> 00:37:31.213
So food for thought.
00:37:31.383 --> 00:37:32.133
Yeah, we're...
00:37:32.133 --> 00:37:38.603
And for... I would say for the first time in a long time, I'm hopeful that maybe we are starting to get there.
00:37:38.943 --> 00:37:55.493
For instance our RFK and HHS and I think this was just last week or the week before I saw this, that they now are going to have a... A- and it was specific to neuropsychiatric, but they're gonna have a code for deprescribing basically, right?
00:37:55.493 --> 00:38:01.543
Doctors will be able to bill for and get paid for deprescribing- Huh ... medications.
00:38:01.583 --> 00:38:07.373
And this was around SSR- SS- SSRIs and psychiatric conditions I saw that.
00:38:07.373 --> 00:38:10.813
That starts to move us a little bit towards the right direction.
00:38:10.813 --> 00:38:12.763
There's still a lot of work to be done there.
00:38:13.023 --> 00:38:22.493
But I'm hopeful that, and again, because of questions that are being raised from the low carb keto community, right?
00:38:22.493 --> 00:38:25.423
These things are starting to be looked at finally.
00:38:25.483 --> 00:38:29.603
A lot of work to be done, but I do have some optimism at least.
00:38:30.323 --> 00:38:33.093
I think we have to be optimistic to some extent.
00:38:33.093 --> 00:38:35.143
Yeah, I think we always have to be optimistic.
00:38:35.143 --> 00:38:43.923
And I think more importantly though doctors and patients need to be need to be properly focused on this, right?
00:38:44.133 --> 00:38:54.123
Again, one of the things that I would say I'm most critical of my colleagues these days about is we've forgotten who we're working for, right?
00:38:54.123 --> 00:38:54.293
Yeah.
00:38:54.363 --> 00:38:56.603
We as doctors, we work for the patient.
00:38:56.983 --> 00:39:01.923
Our goals should all be around, What is going to help the patients.
00:39:02.183 --> 00:39:05.713
And we've lost that plot line in medicine largely.
00:39:06.053 --> 00:39:10.563
And the more that we can get back towards that's what I think really starts to turn this around.
00:39:10.833 --> 00:39:22.763
And again, maybe it's my own confirmation bias, but I see that happening more within the low-carb ketogenic community than I do in the mainstream medical community these days.
00:39:24.033 --> 00:39:24.333
Yeah.
00:39:24.383 --> 00:39:39.653
It's a difficult thing for me personally because I'm also very keenly aware of the changing landscape of medicine and the pressures that are on, especially like young clinicians in training, the amount of time they have, like the forces that are pressing them in a particular direction.
00:39:40.273 --> 00:39:57.813
And the last thing I want to do is have those people who are working so hard to do the right thing feel alienated by creating this us versus them mentality of the metabolic health community's doing the right thing, and you by prescribing medications are doing the wrong thing, because that's not how this divide works.
00:39:58.453 --> 00:40:06.673
So if nothing else, just take a moment to acknowledge that the system is creating a very difficult situation for the doctor and the patient.
00:40:06.813 --> 00:40:18.793
I think especially young doctors in training where there, I can tell you from knowing people in my class, in my life, there's a lot of will to always do what is best for the patient and just a very little permissible autonomy.
00:40:19.873 --> 00:40:24.393
And I'm not a person who's qualified to tell, say what the solution is for that.
00:40:24.393 --> 00:40:30.383
I just wanna say like it's a privilege for me to be able to talk on these things so openly and directly because of the choices I made.
00:40:30.413 --> 00:40:41.203
If I had made other choices, I wouldn't be able to, not only because of my time, but because of the amount of trouble I could get in for even voicing all the things I've said thus far, which, maybe they're provocative, but I hope they're pretty reasonable.
00:40:41.203 --> 00:40:48.573
I try to be pretty precise with my wording and my claims even if they're ex- excited.
00:40:49.533 --> 00:41:04.983
I think I'm generally pretty on point, but like you said, we've been saying earlier, some of the things are implicitly threatening to the present model, and it's really sad that in medicine there isn't like a meritocracy for ideas.
00:41:05.063 --> 00:41:07.243
I talked about this with, a lot of people probably know Dave Feldman.
00:41:07.353 --> 00:41:14.673
He's "If you're an engineer, like you're a junior engineer, you have a good idea, you tell the senior engineer what's up," and they'll be like, "Oh, good idea." Doesn't work like that in medicine.
00:41:15.373 --> 00:41:20.923
A junior person pushes back, even if it's completely legitimate, you can get in a lot of trouble.
00:41:20.923 --> 00:41:22.013
It can harm your career.
00:41:22.513 --> 00:41:25.598
So it puts let's say, the new innovative thinkers in a very difficult position.
00:41:27.738 --> 00:41:32.868
Yeah, and, again i- it, it didn't used to be that way, right?
00:41:32.868 --> 00:41:35.958
I, again, obviously I have my bias as a heart surgeon, right?
00:41:35.958 --> 00:41:43.748
But the story around how heart surgery came to be i- in the history of medicine is just a fascinating one, right?
00:41:44.098 --> 00:41:46.208
And, it was dogma, right?
00:41:46.208 --> 00:41:51.278
That there is no way that anyone could ever touch the human heart without killing the patient.
00:41:51.688 --> 00:42:05.028
And, we look at the innovators and the, the people that led the development of heart surgery, and it really should be a model for how we approach, everything in medicine.
00:42:05.298 --> 00:42:12.508
And yet, if we had to start from the beginning today and try and establish heart surgery, never would've happened, right?
00:42:12.848 --> 00:42:22.998
There are so many crazy stories from, just the history of heart surgery and that just there's no way they could ever happen in today's environment.
00:42:23.348 --> 00:42:34.808
And again, what I see as a clinician is the m- the more we stifle that innovative thinking and the independence of physicians the worse spot we're ending up in.
00:42:35.778 --> 00:42:36.068
Yeah.
00:42:36.678 --> 00:42:48.708
What I guess I'd love to hear a little bit more about, your decision-making around, not going down the traditional route, not, continuing on to a residency after you graduated medical school.
00:42:48.978 --> 00:42:55.588
I think the audience would love to hear, Yeah ... what has led you in the pa- down the path that you're going down now.
00:42:56.218 --> 00:43:00.368
Yeah, I mean, there were many layers of motivation.
00:43:01.048 --> 00:43:14.758
I think the thing I needed to push the most against was feeling that I was letting down the people in my life or in some way giving up on what was, quote-unquote, the right thing to do.
00:43:14.758 --> 00:43:26.898
Because when you grow up in that environment when your entire life is geared towards it, when you've worked so hard to get to a point where it's all supposed to culminate, I mean, which is to, I had a lot of privileges and I acknowledge those.
00:43:26.898 --> 00:43:33.358
I still worked incredibly hard in college to get a scholarship to do my PhD, to get into medical school, to go through medical school.
00:43:33.358 --> 00:43:34.288
It's a long road.
00:43:34.828 --> 00:43:37.028
And the whole idea is then at the end of the road you become a clinician.
00:43:37.028 --> 00:43:38.108
That is the concept.
00:43:38.738 --> 00:43:46.848
And there's also a pride one takes in adopting that calling.
00:43:47.628 --> 00:43:52.768
But to sit and care for people, I mean, is there anything greater, more admirable?
00:43:53.348 --> 00:43:55.088
And you wanna be that person.
00:43:55.218 --> 00:44:02.688
You wanna be the person who's "I wanna get up every day and sacrifice myself for my patients." That was the narrative I was told and for some people it's true.
00:44:02.918 --> 00:44:03.968
It's an incredible narrative.
00:44:04.068 --> 00:44:06.948
I have friends, I have loved ones who that's what they do.
00:44:07.588 --> 00:44:13.938
And for me it was interesting'cause I like caring for people, but I was realizing there were different ways to care for people and things that really made me excited.
00:44:14.488 --> 00:44:21.438
And this is i- it was very hard for me to say the first time, but there was like, I just didn't love patient care.
00:44:21.758 --> 00:44:30.208
I would end up in a patient room and I'd be thinking about the Nature paper I read that mor- that morning, and I had a terrible amount of guilt for it because I'm like, "This person deserves my attention.
00:44:30.798 --> 00:44:35.048
This human deserves my attention," but it's also not where I wanna be.
00:44:35.048 --> 00:44:36.418
It's not where I'm excited to be.
00:44:36.568 --> 00:44:38.228
Me, Nick, where I'm excited to be.
00:44:38.228 --> 00:44:47.948
And I realized through what I was doing on the side that there actually is another opportunity here to help people, but do it through my skill set and what I love, which is teaching.
00:44:48.378 --> 00:45:01.008
To take information, even like basic science, cell science, nature, and get people excited about how their bodies work, and teach them how to take control of their own health journey as a complement to the support they might be getting from conventional medicine.
00:45:01.628 --> 00:45:03.698
Because that doesn't get serviced.
00:45:04.458 --> 00:45:06.168
It's something that I wish I had.
00:45:07.348 --> 00:45:18.138
The power of information, the power of, not to be too cheesy, but curiosity, like curiosity in your own health path, and be like, look, this is hard.
00:45:18.138 --> 00:45:19.168
Yeah, it's always gonna be hard.
00:45:19.168 --> 00:45:20.458
My job is not to make it easy for you.
00:45:20.458 --> 00:45:30.178
My job is to be like, it's gonna be hard, but it can also be a privilege and fun, not a chore, to figure out how your body works and how you can attrea- treat your whole life as an experiment.
00:45:30.178 --> 00:45:43.148
And what I was finding was, as this started to scale, and people can accuse me of confirmation bias here, but I've decided I can help a lot more people this way, and as a person selfishly be happier doing it.
00:45:43.418 --> 00:45:56.878
But I actually think there's an alternate path for me as an individual where I can help a lot more people with their health doing what I'm going to do than treating patients one-on-one.
00:45:57.248 --> 00:46:08.788
Not to devalue that by any means, but it was my personal recognition about what I wanted to do and where I would fit in the evolving sport of medicine.
00:46:08.818 --> 00:46:08.878
Okay.
00:46:08.878 --> 00:46:10.968
So that was ultimately my decision.
00:46:10.968 --> 00:46:18.728
You can imagine it was hard to tell my family my mentors, but once I decided that was what I was gonna do, that's what I did.
00:46:18.798 --> 00:46:22.738
There was, like, n- nothing left to prove, I proved what I need to prove to myself.
00:46:23.128 --> 00:46:35.428
I know how to play this game, and I know I'm gonna get some hate for not quote unquote, "completing the journey," 'cause now I've gone from being as inside the insiders as you could be to being on the, quote unquote,"outside," but I'm like...
00:46:36.558 --> 00:46:56.538
People who know my background know I... it's not that I couldn't do it, it was that this is a very conscious d- choice to, quote unquote, "give up" and that on one path and go on another, but- It was the right thing for me and I guess it took me 30 years to develop... 28, I guess, develop the confidence to make that leap and do what I thought was best for me and for what I can do for the world.
00:46:56.598 --> 00:47:01.448
And I, now being a year out from school, am tremendously confident in that choice.
00:47:01.978 --> 00:47:05.708
And some people can hate on it, some people can accept it, but it was 100% the right choice.
00:47:07.548 --> 00:47:11.628
Oh, I have no question it was the right choice for the public at large.
00:47:11.678 --> 00:47:17.758
Your skills would be wasted in a tiny little examination room one at a time.
00:47:18.458 --> 00:47:26.008
You're a tremendous communicator, which is something that is a little rare amongst practicing physicians.
00:47:26.668 --> 00:47:29.748
It's a gift that you're able to do this.
00:47:31.148 --> 00:47:31.348
Thanks.
00:47:31.348 --> 00:47:34.138
Phil, I have all kinds of things I could comment on.
00:47:34.478 --> 00:48:02.388
Coming at it from the patient point of view I'm a massive fan of what Nick is doing because as a patient, I've sat in too many examination rooms and been treated as the average of an algorithm rather than as an actual human being who has a unique set of backgrounds and circumstances and motivations and pre- presenting symptoms, and I...
00:48:02.428 --> 00:48:03.798
it just drove me crazy.
00:48:03.798 --> 00:48:07.778
That's why I gave up on, on the traditional medical community 20 years ago.
00:48:08.498 --> 00:48:08.858
Yeah.
00:48:09.018 --> 00:48:14.348
I was tired of not being listened to and treated as a...
00:48:16.578 --> 00:48:16.818
Yeah.
00:48:17.258 --> 00:48:17.858
It's too common.
00:48:18.478 --> 00:48:20.288
I mean, that's where I speak from a place of authority.
00:48:20.288 --> 00:48:21.818
If y- We were talking about clinical experience earlier.
00:48:21.818 --> 00:48:24.158
It's "Oh, you don't have clinical experience." But I have a patient experience.
00:48:24.608 --> 00:48:26.858
Set aside my doctorates, whatever.
00:48:26.888 --> 00:48:31.308
I know what it's like to be in that position and that's what I'm willing to fight for.
00:48:31.788 --> 00:48:36.008
And if I need to fight fire with fire and have a little letters and fancy affiliations screw it.
00:48:36.008 --> 00:48:36.258
Fine.
00:48:36.258 --> 00:48:36.568
Whatever.
00:48:36.598 --> 00:48:37.188
I'll use that.
00:48:37.348 --> 00:48:46.158
I'll use that, but really my motivation and my ethos, my experience is, that happened to me again and again, and it's happened to so many people.
00:48:46.248 --> 00:48:53.368
And so I, I love teaching, but it's also part of the broader effort to scrap for the right of that person to advocate for themselves in an informed manner.
00:48:55.828 --> 00:49:01.618
And so where do you see this kind of fitting into the future of medicine?
00:49:01.828 --> 00:49:11.568
You alluded to that the, doctors... the medical profession were sort of, the gatekeepers of the information in the past, right?
00:49:11.568 --> 00:49:13.108
No one else had access to it.
00:49:13.428 --> 00:49:15.358
But we're in a much different era now.
00:49:15.628 --> 00:49:18.478
Everyone has access to the information, right?
00:49:18.478 --> 00:49:23.688
That starts to re calculate, I guess, what is the doctor's role in this?
00:49:24.028 --> 00:49:28.168
What, the information curation, right?
00:49:28.218 --> 00:49:29.788
Getting that to the patients.
00:49:30.028 --> 00:49:32.338
Where do you think we're headed with all of this?
00:49:33.078 --> 00:49:53.658
I think there's gonna be a big uptake in true patient-centered care, not just lip service and individualized care, for the reason you said, which is patients have information, they're gonna be advocating for themselves, they're not looking for gurus anymore, and there really is no option than, other than to service what their desires are and respect their perspectives.
00:49:53.908 --> 00:50:02.558
Doesn't mean there can't be, like, s- true mutual respect and that patients shouldn't respect their doctors, because they do have training and skillsets, and it should be a teamwork.
00:50:02.588 --> 00:50:09.438
But I think we're gonna see the rapid demise of paternalism in medicine, which has lasted too long.
00:50:09.498 --> 00:50:15.818
The funny thing, I'm gonna be provocative right now, is- I s- I see a lot of...
00:50:12.568 --> 00:50:28.708
paternalism is dying because of the democratization of science, and the f- and there's a certain type of old guard doctor who, in seeing this happen, tries to defend against it by doubling down with more paternalism and arrogance.
00:50:28.788 --> 00:50:39.538
In effect, accelerating their own demise, and they can't help it, and I see it happening right in front of me, where somebody like a physician on social media will make some snarky remark about the stupid LDL deniers.
00:50:39.538 --> 00:50:50.228
And I'm like, "You do realize you're losing credibility because people think you're an arrogant dick, so maybe you shouldn't be an arrogant dick. Maybe." They're like how dare you say that?
00:50:50.228 --> 00:51:05.128
You're my junior." I'm like n- this is the situation we have in. Have the emotional intelligence to see what's going on here and become part of the new ecosystem, otherwise you're going to go extinct." So that is the tough love directive that I can say now because of the choices I make.
00:51:05.128 --> 00:51:06.938
You can imagine me saying that as an intern.
00:51:07.638 --> 00:51:08.778
My God, I'd get crucified.
00:51:09.478 --> 00:51:13.758
But I think that's the matter of fact, and it's gonna pu- piss some people off, and maybe that's necessary.
00:51:13.808 --> 00:51:15.188
If I were... I am.
00:51:15.418 --> 00:51:19.998
I would say for the patients, I'd be very optimistic, because n- the power is being shifted into your hands.
00:51:20.208 --> 00:51:29.008
And I will also just say in parallel with all this are emerging technologies that will enhance individualized care with the combination of AI, bio-tracking technologies.
00:51:29.008 --> 00:51:31.148
I think we're gonna move towards a lot more personalized medicine.
00:51:32.698 --> 00:51:34.528
So I am optimistic for the future.
00:51:35.078 --> 00:51:41.578
I just It's like a slow, large ball rolling in front of me, and I'm just trying to give it some shoves along the way, accelerate it a little bit.
00:51:41.988 --> 00:51:42.648
I guess that's my duty.
00:51:42.698 --> 00:52:06.668
I have a friend in the an online friend who operates in a completely different realm of the scientific world who is he's a theoretical physicist, and he has a theory of energy that, Is testable and falsifiable, and has been tested, and is replicable.
00:52:09.148 --> 00:52:14.868
And he's also flying in the face of accepted theoretical physics for the last 40 years.
00:52:15.698 --> 00:52:27.198
And because I recognize patterns, I was able to say to him, "You're dealing with a situation that's very common any time you're trying to make a massive change in anything that's got a lot of inertia.
00:52:29.238 --> 00:52:35.898
First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win." Yeah.
00:52:36.428 --> 00:52:38.158
And he is now in the fighting stage.
00:52:38.158 --> 00:52:41.138
When I met him, he was in the ignoring stage.
00:52:41.138 --> 00:52:42.948
He's already gotten through the mocking.
00:52:43.628 --> 00:52:46.318
And I, and I see the same thing here.
00:52:47.008 --> 00:53:02.628
The l- the low carb diet, when it first started getting talked about, was ignored and we're largely in the mocking stage, and I can see that we're moving to the fighting stage.
00:53:03.068 --> 00:53:03.898
That's fun.
00:53:04.248 --> 00:53:12.538
I mean, another way to phrase it is the present sees lunatics and geniuses as the same, and then, history will sort out the difference.
00:53:12.538 --> 00:53:17.308
I'm not making which claim- I'm I'm not making a claim as to which group I'm in, I'm just saying this is how things operate.
00:53:17.768 --> 00:53:24.678
People with bold ideas who history sees as the geniuses at a point in time will be like, "You're crazy, you're fringe," and get a lot of hate.
00:53:25.318 --> 00:53:30.078
Yeah I'm willing to fight for it because obviously I think I'm right.
00:53:30.748 --> 00:53:37.218
I could end up being wrong, but also that's part of being a true scientist and you you defend your ideas- Yes ... and at the end the data will be what the data will be.
00:53:37.308 --> 00:53:49.978
And if I end up a laughing stock of history, I will probably die content in the belief that I genuinely did everything I believed was right every step of the way.
00:53:50.418 --> 00:53:51.808
So that's just how I try to live my life.
00:53:52.138 --> 00:53:55.368
Hopefully I don't end up that way, but, do what makes you super nice.
00:53:55.368 --> 00:53:55.458
Yeah.
00:53:55.458 --> 00:53:59.718
And I think that does, That does hit on a very important point, right?
00:53:59.718 --> 00:54:04.358
Is that we don't want to fall into the same traps, right?
00:54:04.358 --> 00:54:13.088
Of the sort of religiosity of just defending o- our ideas when i- if there is evidence to the contrary.
00:54:13.428 --> 00:54:15.908
And again, going back to your case report, right?
00:54:15.908 --> 00:54:22.108
And all of this if your CT angiogram showed high levels of plaque, right?
00:54:22.158 --> 00:54:24.368
That changes the discussion.
00:54:24.828 --> 00:54:25.198
Yeah.
00:54:25.228 --> 00:54:25.918
I had a vein on my face.
00:54:25.918 --> 00:54:31.228
But the fact that it doesn't so far, I think it says that we're, y- you're still on the right path.
00:54:31.958 --> 00:54:39.508
I was actually struck it was a zero 'cause 'cause, at the time, like this was all coming out, I had talked to the CEO of the company that did the analysis.
00:54:39.508 --> 00:54:42.298
Yeah, people in their 20 to 30s, like it's pretty common for them to have plaque.
00:54:42.298 --> 00:54:45.808
And then there were some influencers like Simon Hill, who's also in his 30s, came out.
00:54:45.808 --> 00:54:47.568
He's like he has 60 millimeters cubed of plaque.
00:54:47.568 --> 00:54:48.098
I'm like, ooh.
00:54:49.468 --> 00:54:53.238
So when it was a flat zero, that was surprising even to me.
00:54:53.238 --> 00:54:56.478
People watched the video, which I released this morning, and I encouraged them to do.
00:54:56.878 --> 00:55:01.028
You see... I videotaped the moment of my reaction, and I was like, I was flabbergasted.
00:55:01.028 --> 00:55:03.648
You see me go into the CT machine, get the contrast dye.
00:55:03.648 --> 00:55:04.128
It's all fun.
00:55:04.128 --> 00:55:06.238
So I encourage people to check that out.
00:55:06.238 --> 00:55:12.688
And at the end, I get more vulnerable than I ever have in a video, talking about some of the things we talked about today.
00:55:12.718 --> 00:55:15.128
So thank you for having me.
00:55:15.158 --> 00:55:19.258
I do have to jump to my next meeting, but this is a, this was a lovely hour, and I appreciate your hospitality.
00:55:19.258 --> 00:55:20.428
Oh my goodness, It's been an hour.
00:55:20.668 --> 00:55:21.888
Time flies when you're having fun.
00:55:22.338 --> 00:55:22.788
Awesome.
00:55:22.788 --> 00:55:25.618
Gi- give people the quick where they can find you.
00:55:25.618 --> 00:55:29.688
Not that you're hard to find, but, Yeah ... we'll have all the links in the show notes.
00:55:30.138 --> 00:55:33.288
Yeah, X, Instagram, and YouTube, I'm Nick Norwitz.
00:55:33.288 --> 00:55:35.198
That's N-O-R-W-I-T-Z.
00:55:35.268 --> 00:55:36.378
No other Nick Norwitzs.
00:55:36.418 --> 00:55:40.238
I probably put the most information on my Substack now, which is Stay Curious Metabolism.
00:55:40.888 --> 00:55:49.528
You can find it is now number two best-selling globally in science on Substack, so I'm very proud of that, and that's where we have the most in-depth information coming out.
00:55:49.528 --> 00:55:50.978
It's also the lifeblood of everything I do.
00:55:50.978 --> 00:55:52.048
It's financing all of it.
00:55:52.098 --> 00:55:56.788
If people want the deep dives at least three times a week on all things cutting edge metabolic health, go there.
00:55:56.788 --> 00:56:01.368
If you want the top of funnel, nice video production quality, totally free within the YouTube channel.
00:56:01.468 --> 00:56:02.228
Thank you for having me.
00:56:02.448 --> 00:56:04.198
I'll let you guys get to the rest of your afternoon.
00:56:05.209 --> 00:56:05.639
All right.
00:56:06.639 --> 00:56:09.419
For Nick Norwitz and Dr.
00:56:06.639 --> 00:56:10.819
Phil Ovadia, this has been Stay Off My Operating Table.
00:56:10.908 --> 00:56:11.868
Thanks for joining us.
00:56:12.228 --> 00:56:15.599
All the information will be in the show notes, and we'll see you all next time.