TRANSKRIPT 🔗
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.910 --> 00:00:03.490
Welcome, everyone, to another edition of 45 Forward, where our
2
00:00:03.509 --> 00:00:05.690
mission is to help you, our listeners from Los Angeles
3
00:00:05.750 --> 00:00:08.089
to Long Island, make your second half of life even
4
00:00:08.130 --> 00:00:12.029
better than the first. Americans approaching retirement, however they plan
5
00:00:12.050 --> 00:00:16.449
to spend those years, have experienced some frightening economic waves recently.
6
00:00:17.170 --> 00:00:20.339
During the Great Recession of 2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic
7
00:00:20.379 --> 00:00:23.640
of the early 2020s, older workers experienced higher rates of
8
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:26.620
job loss than younger ones, and many have not fully recovered.
9
00:00:27.440 --> 00:00:30.449
Spiking inflation and the possibility of another recession have led
10
00:00:30.489 --> 00:00:33.850
to a stressful economic circumstance for millions who've been thrown
11
00:00:33.869 --> 00:00:37.030
off course and are still struggling to envision a secure future.
12
00:00:37.049 --> 00:00:41.159
In today's episode, Mark Miller, a veteran journalist, author, and
13
00:00:41.200 --> 00:00:44.740
podcaster who is a nationally recognized expert on trends in
14
00:00:44.780 --> 00:00:47.460
retirement and aging, walks us through a short course of
15
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:50.899
decisions we could make to improve our financial security in retirement,
16
00:00:51.579 --> 00:00:54.079
even if it's just a few years away. Mark, the
17
00:00:54.119 --> 00:00:57.140
author of the recently published book, Retirement Reboot, Common Sense
18
00:00:57.179 --> 00:01:00.829
Financial Strategies for Getting Back on Track, outlines the steps
19
00:01:00.850 --> 00:01:03.630
we need to remake, the retirement plan, and the critical
20
00:01:03.659 --> 00:01:06.819
importance of managing the risk of longevity by optimizing Social
21
00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:09.780
Security and Medicare benefits. He'll also talk about how to
22
00:01:09.799 --> 00:01:13.079
build savings, even late in the game. And he'll provide
23
00:01:13.099 --> 00:01:16.870
some refreshing insights in conversations with his own children, answering
24
00:01:16.890 --> 00:01:20.989
their questions about retirement, discovering some unexpected conclusions about the
25
00:01:21.030 --> 00:01:24.530
next generation's preparedness for their later years. So now let's
26
00:01:24.569 --> 00:01:27.129
meet our guest, Mark Miller. Mark, welcome back to the show.
27
00:01:27.150 --> 00:01:28.959
Thanks, Ron. Great to be here.
28
00:01:29.250 --> 00:01:31.189
Yeah, I say welcome back because Mark was one of
29
00:01:31.250 --> 00:01:34.180
my first guests when I started the podcast. We had
30
00:01:34.200 --> 00:01:37.459
a great session then, and I know we'll have another
31
00:01:37.480 --> 00:01:39.859
great one today. So welcome back, Mark.
32
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:41.040
Thanks so much.
33
00:01:42.620 --> 00:01:45.849
So we'll talk a lot more about Mark's book, The
34
00:01:45.930 --> 00:01:48.650
Retirement Reboot. There's a lot of great information in there.
35
00:01:49.409 --> 00:01:51.569
I just wanted to start with you, Mark, about one
36
00:01:51.590 --> 00:01:53.709
of the interesting things you say is that people talk
37
00:01:53.730 --> 00:01:56.319
about a lot of the risks of retirement planning. And
38
00:01:56.439 --> 00:01:58.739
one of the main premises you make is, well, there's
39
00:01:58.799 --> 00:02:01.819
a risk people don't recognize, which is longevity. So talk
40
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:02.599
a little bit about that.
41
00:02:03.599 --> 00:02:06.140
Right. So the surveys that have been done where you
42
00:02:06.180 --> 00:02:09.159
just ask people about what they think the biggest risk
43
00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:13.280
is in retirement, people tend to answer with things like
44
00:02:14.259 --> 00:02:18.069
the risk of poor health or stock market risk would
45
00:02:18.110 --> 00:02:20.469
be a couple of examples of things that people tend
46
00:02:20.509 --> 00:02:24.289
to cite. But from a kind of a quantified research
47
00:02:24.330 --> 00:02:28.680
standpoint with the researchers tell us is that longevity is
48
00:02:28.719 --> 00:02:32.599
the biggest thing, what they call longevity risk, namely the
49
00:02:32.639 --> 00:02:36.020
risk about living your money. And it's become a bigger
50
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:39.659
deal in recent decades for a number of reasons. One
51
00:02:39.780 --> 00:02:44.120
is longevity, generally speaking, is up, which is great. It's
52
00:02:44.159 --> 00:02:47.250
a good thing. Although there are some footnotes to that,
53
00:02:47.310 --> 00:02:51.270
I think. They're not up for everybody. The biggest gains
54
00:02:51.330 --> 00:02:55.349
have been among people who are more affluent, better educated,
55
00:02:57.810 --> 00:03:00.050
people have tended to enjoy the greatest gains in longevity.
56
00:03:00.069 --> 00:03:03.400
But at any rate, overall longevity has generally been on
57
00:03:03.409 --> 00:03:06.460
the upswing the last few decades. And at the same time,
58
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:12.979
fewer Americans have robust sources of guaranteed lifetime income from,
59
00:03:13.159 --> 00:03:18.719
let's say, a traditional defined benefit pension. So for most
60
00:03:18.759 --> 00:03:21.550
of us, the main source of guaranteed income will be
61
00:03:21.590 --> 00:03:25.270
Social Security. which is terribly important. I'm sure we'll talk
62
00:03:25.289 --> 00:03:27.689
more about that, but it's only going to replace a
63
00:03:27.729 --> 00:03:29.949
certain amount of your income. So as we've shifted to
64
00:03:30.009 --> 00:03:33.830
more of this system of the defined contribution system for
65
00:03:33.870 --> 00:03:37.550
saving for retirement, which most people would label as 401k plans,
66
00:03:39.050 --> 00:03:40.650
I get asked this all the time. Well, how do
67
Load full transcript
00:03:40.710 --> 00:03:44.150
I plan to manage my savings so that I can
68
00:03:44.189 --> 00:03:47.289
stretch them throughout my retirement? And I said, well, that's easy.
69
00:03:47.310 --> 00:03:49.699
You just need to supply me with one number, which
70
00:03:49.759 --> 00:03:50.659
is how long will you live?
71
00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:51.860
Right, right.
72
00:03:52.409 --> 00:03:56.909
So that illustrates the problem. And that's not the only problem.
73
00:03:56.960 --> 00:04:00.219
The other problem with the 401k system is that it
74
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:03.759
only reaches about half of workers in the first place.
75
00:04:04.539 --> 00:04:07.879
And generally speaking, this is an experiment we've running now
76
00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:12.580
since the 1980s, this shift from defined benefit to defined contribution.
77
00:04:13.000 --> 00:04:14.560
And what we see is that all the money is
78
00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:19.329
being accumulated in sort of the top 20% of households,
79
00:04:19.610 --> 00:04:21.069
almost all of it. I mean, when you look at
80
00:04:21.110 --> 00:04:23.829
it broken up by quintiles, as soon as you get
81
00:04:23.870 --> 00:04:26.360
below those top two quintiles, what you see is that
82
00:04:27.899 --> 00:04:31.899
the amounts saved are much smaller or negligent or non-existent
83
00:04:33.139 --> 00:04:37.199
and certainly not significant enough to be a meaningful source
84
00:04:37.259 --> 00:04:41.430
of income throughout retirement. So those are the reasons why
85
00:04:41.449 --> 00:04:43.550
longevity risk is such a big deal.
86
00:04:43.970 --> 00:04:47.029
Right. Yeah, it's hard to know. I mean, I guess
87
00:04:47.069 --> 00:04:51.949
there are some longevity projection calculators that you've talked about. But,
88
00:04:52.829 --> 00:04:57.029
you know, they're not that good, questionable ones, certainly.
89
00:04:57.230 --> 00:04:59.449
I mean, a good one is, I think it's a
90
00:04:59.529 --> 00:05:02.769
good illustration to get. It just is going to help
91
00:05:02.829 --> 00:05:07.709
people be thoughtful and think through these issues. The one
92
00:05:07.730 --> 00:05:10.509
that I mentioned in the book that I particularly like
93
00:05:10.649 --> 00:05:14.620
is called the Longevity Illustrator Calculator, which is created by
94
00:05:14.639 --> 00:05:18.459
the American Academy Actuaries. It's a very simple calculator. you know,
95
00:05:18.540 --> 00:05:20.660
set of inputs, you know, your age, your gender, do
96
00:05:20.680 --> 00:05:22.879
you smoke or not your own general assessment of health.
97
00:05:23.709 --> 00:05:25.649
And it kind of spits back a kind of a
98
00:05:25.750 --> 00:05:29.089
range of possible outcomes that for some people will be
99
00:05:29.189 --> 00:05:32.629
eye openers because the people tend to underestimate their own
100
00:05:33.189 --> 00:05:36.449
possible longevity. I think people tend to fixate on what
101
00:05:36.470 --> 00:05:39.470
they read or hear are the averages. So the average
102
00:05:39.509 --> 00:05:42.170
male lives to age 80, you know, whatever it is, 83,
103
00:05:42.149 --> 00:05:46.019
I forget. Um, without stopping to think about that that's
104
00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:50.050
just the average. So many will outlive that. Women tend
105
00:05:50.060 --> 00:05:54.350
to outlive that. And for married couples, it's quite likely
106
00:05:54.389 --> 00:05:59.089
that one spouse will outlive the mortality averages. So those
107
00:05:59.129 --> 00:06:02.629
are the sorts of planning considerations that need to come
108
00:06:02.670 --> 00:06:08.110
into play. But anyway, that illustrator is at longevityillustrator.org.
109
00:06:08.410 --> 00:06:13.740
Yeah. I think you're right in terms of people can underestimate.
110
00:06:13.779 --> 00:06:19.089
I was on a webinar yesterday. It was about caregiving
111
00:06:19.370 --> 00:06:22.910
and it was a lot about long-term care and how
112
00:06:22.930 --> 00:06:27.629
do people plan for caregiving. And the call-in people, there
113
00:06:27.649 --> 00:06:30.110
were about half a dozen call-in people from around the country.
114
00:06:30.129 --> 00:06:33.360
And I think the youngest person on the call was
115
00:06:33.579 --> 00:06:37.759
in their high 80s. And there was a couple in
116
00:06:37.779 --> 00:06:42.899
their 90s. So yeah, I think that it's still it's
117
00:06:43.079 --> 00:06:47.949
a bonus, but it's a concern as well. So let's
118
00:06:47.990 --> 00:06:51.069
dive into some of the themes of your book, Retirement Reboot,
119
00:06:51.129 --> 00:06:54.649
Common Sense, Financial Strategies for Getting Back on Track. It's
120
00:06:54.689 --> 00:06:58.689
a six-part series, and I have listened to a bunch
121
00:06:58.709 --> 00:07:01.899
of them of your reboot casts on your website. We'll
122
00:07:02.100 --> 00:07:03.779
talk about that more later so people know where to
123
00:07:03.839 --> 00:07:06.579
find the outline of some of these chapters. But so first,
124
00:07:07.339 --> 00:07:10.230
just in the title, Getting Back on Track. So I
125
00:07:10.259 --> 00:07:13.550
assume then that a lot of people are on track
126
00:07:13.629 --> 00:07:16.350
for a number of reasons. And so what are some
127
00:07:16.370 --> 00:07:17.829
of those reasons? I mean, I think part of it
128
00:07:17.889 --> 00:07:21.569
is people don't plan very well. But is that your
129
00:07:21.610 --> 00:07:23.410
sense that a lot of people are not on track
130
00:07:23.430 --> 00:07:24.089
in the first place?
131
00:07:25.750 --> 00:07:27.870
Yeah. You know, going back to what I said about
132
00:07:28.009 --> 00:07:31.209
retirement savings, if you just start with a really kind
133
00:07:31.230 --> 00:07:34.889
of wide view of this, you know, most people receive
134
00:07:34.930 --> 00:07:38.540
Social Security in retirement. Social Security, on average, is going
135
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:42.399
to replace 40% of your pre-retirement income.
It's a little
136
00:07:42.439 --> 00:07:45.839
higher for low-income households, and it's a little lower than
137
00:07:45.879 --> 00:07:51.019
that for high-income households. But that's generally the replacement figure. Now,
138
00:07:51.540 --> 00:07:54.899
from my perspective, the goal that we're trying to reach
139
00:07:55.689 --> 00:07:58.829
in terms of a retirement plan is maintaining your standard
140
00:07:58.850 --> 00:08:03.389
of living in retirement. It's really that simple. if there
141
00:08:03.420 --> 00:08:06.079
are bonuses such as the ability to spend money on
142
00:08:06.139 --> 00:08:10.540
travel or spoil your grandchildren, that's great too. And you
143
00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.459
can plan that into it. But the real question is,
144
00:08:13.540 --> 00:08:17.670
can you meet your basic living expenses in retirement and
145
00:08:17.689 --> 00:08:20.670
hopefully have something left over? Now, kind of the rule
146
00:08:20.709 --> 00:08:23.029
of thumb that you hear from financial planners is that
147
00:08:23.129 --> 00:08:27.800
most of us need to replace 70% of our pre-retirement income.
148
00:08:27.839 --> 00:08:30.959
Some would even say higher And that's a very, very
149
00:08:31.300 --> 00:08:34.779
crude rule of thumb. It's not really the number. But
150
00:08:34.919 --> 00:08:37.279
as a starting point, it's not a bad place to
151
00:08:37.320 --> 00:08:40.879
consider that there's this gap for many people from the
152
00:08:40.879 --> 00:08:44.000
40% that Social Security will replace. How do we close
153
00:08:44.039 --> 00:08:47.460
that gap to 70? Now, what we know is, as
154
00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:52.360
I said, is that retirement saving has worked out. The
155
00:08:52.379 --> 00:08:55.529
401k system has worked really well for affluent households and
156
00:08:55.570 --> 00:08:57.870
for people who have access to them. And it's done
157
00:08:57.879 --> 00:09:01.029
next to nothing for everybody else. So depending whose numbers
158
00:09:01.070 --> 00:09:04.269
you look at, at least half, maybe two thirds of
159
00:09:04.789 --> 00:09:08.830
near retirement households, which we define as those within 10
160
00:09:08.830 --> 00:09:12.450
years of retirement, have an issue that they need to
161
00:09:12.490 --> 00:09:15.970
sort out. And one of the things I'm at pains
162
00:09:15.990 --> 00:09:19.250
to do in the book is to say, when we
163
00:09:19.289 --> 00:09:22.029
consider why, why do we have that situation for so
164
00:09:22.049 --> 00:09:25.389
many households? I'm at pains to say, let's not blame
165
00:09:25.409 --> 00:09:29.360
the victim here. First off, only half of households have
166
00:09:29.379 --> 00:09:33.330
access to a 401k. If you're getting near retirement now,
167
00:09:33.450 --> 00:09:37.090
you have lived and worked through four major economic downturns
168
00:09:37.690 --> 00:09:42.509
during your working years, two of which were severe crisis-level events,
169
00:09:42.610
--> 00:09:46.889
the financial crisis and Great Recession that occurred in 2009, 2010,
170
00:09:46.889 --> 00:09:50.649
and really stretched out for many of us throughout the
171
00:09:50.889 --> 00:09:54.289
rest of that next decade. Was it really a signature
172
00:09:54.309 --> 00:09:59.879
kind of economic cataclysmic event for millions of people. I
173
00:09:59.909 --> 00:10:01.980
think we have short memories in this country. We tend
174
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:03.940
to think of things like that as sort of having
175
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:07.940
receded into the distant past, but that's not really how
176
00:10:08.000 --> 00:10:11.419
it works from an economic standpoint. If you lost your job,
177
00:10:11.700 --> 00:10:15.019
lost your home, lost your retirement savings in the Great Recession,
178
00:10:15.779 --> 00:10:18.220
you may have gotten back on track sometime over the
179
00:10:18.500 --> 00:10:22.879
following years in terms of finding a new job. But
180
00:10:23.379 --> 00:10:27.480
the losses that you incurred during that period are permanent
181
00:10:27.500 --> 00:10:29.840
in the sense that it's very difficult to make those
182
00:10:29.879 --> 00:10:32.179
things up. People that go back to work after a
183
00:10:32.220 --> 00:10:36.940
long layoff typically go back at a lower wage. The
184
00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:41.139
losses in terms of assets, it's very hard to catch
185
00:10:41.220 --> 00:10:43.639
up with that. They tend to compound out over the
186
00:10:43.940 --> 00:10:47.600
following years. So there's any number of reasons, I think,
187
00:10:47.700 --> 00:10:52.889
why We find ourselves in this situation and people face
188
00:10:52.909 --> 00:10:57.649
a lot of financial pressures, whether it's dealing with student debt,
189
00:10:57.710 --> 00:11:00.450
the cost of sending kids to college, the escalating costs
190
00:11:00.529 --> 00:11:03.009
of housing and healthcare. So when we ask the question,
191
00:11:03.049 --> 00:11:06.179
why aren't more people saving? I think the answer simply
192
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:09.519
is that the money isn't available. Now, people who sort
193
00:11:09.539 --> 00:11:12.259
of focus on behavioral economics like to say that, oh,
194
00:11:12.340 --> 00:11:15.179
there's all these sort of psychological reasons people don't do it.
195
00:11:15.659 --> 00:11:19.820
People don't want to think about their future selves. People procrastinate.
196
00:11:20.580 --> 00:11:23.620
All that may be true to an extent, but from
197
00:11:23.639 --> 00:11:26.740
where I'm sitting, if the dollars aren't available, you can't
198
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:29.759
save them. And not only that, there may be things
199
00:11:29.799 --> 00:11:33.179
you should be using those dollars for first before you
200
00:11:34.450 --> 00:11:36.950
sock them away in an IRA account. If you're carrying
201
00:11:37.870 --> 00:11:41.120
high interest rate credit card debt, for example, you know,
202
00:11:41.409 --> 00:11:44.460
the first available dollar ought to go to reducing that debt,
203
00:11:44.519 --> 00:11:48.259
not into a 401k again. So lots of reasons, you know,
204
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:51.000
why I felt there was an opportunity to do a
205
00:11:51.039 --> 00:11:55.490
book for that part of the near retirement population. You know, I,
206
00:11:56.240 --> 00:11:59.179
I write about both public policy and kind of the
207
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:02.980
personal finance side of retirement. And then the public policy side,
208
00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:06.850
there's this endless debate about, you know, the retirement crisis,
209
00:12:06.990 --> 00:12:09.789
which is broadly speaking, the topic we're talking about here.
210
00:12:09.809 --> 00:12:10.309
Right.
211
00:12:10.710 --> 00:12:12.330
And what we can do about those things on the
212
00:12:12.370 --> 00:12:14.769
public policy side. And I have thoughts about that, which
213
00:12:14.809 --> 00:12:16.490
we can get into later if you want to. And
214
00:12:16.509 --> 00:12:18.669
I deal with them in the book. But it really
215
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:23.220
has struck me over the years that the personal finance
216
00:12:23.440 --> 00:12:30.679
journalism field has things exactly upside down. Most personal finance
217
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:34.759
journalism is written for and targets the people who need
218
00:12:34.779 --> 00:12:38.460
the help least. The people who actually have savings and
219
00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:40.779
are trying to figure out how to you know, get
220
00:12:40.820 --> 00:12:43.779
the edge on their investment portfolio or the latest trick
221
00:12:44.179 --> 00:12:47.330
they can pull on to save on taxes or, you know,
222
00:12:48.210 --> 00:12:51.830
on and on. It's an endless menu. And we don't
223
00:12:51.889 --> 00:12:55.250
focus so much on, and a lot of those people,
224
00:12:55.309 --> 00:12:57.580
by the way, have financial planners too, who can help
225
00:12:57.620 --> 00:13:00.720
them out. So, but, so I felt like, well, and I,
226
00:13:00.759 --> 00:13:04.580
there are reasons for that, that probably listeners aren't that,
227
00:13:04.600 --> 00:13:06.700
can be that interested in the inside baseball of how,
228
00:13:07.259 --> 00:13:10.399
journalism works. But I thought there was an opportunity to
229
00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:12.659
do a book that maybe could lay out some practical
230
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:17.450
steps for people to take who find themselves in this situation.
231
00:13:17.470 --> 00:13:19.490
And so that's what I set out to do. Yeah.
232
00:13:20.330 --> 00:13:26.049
Yeah, the terrific points. Yeah, I think that last thing
233
00:13:26.070 --> 00:13:28.169
too about the people who really need it most are
234
00:13:28.210 --> 00:13:31.990
the ones we're not targeting. Now, just getting back to
235
00:13:32.009 --> 00:13:34.870
Social Security for a second, granted that it does not
236
00:13:36.250 --> 00:13:40.529
cover the needs
for most people fully for their retirement.
237
00:13:41.330 --> 00:13:43.789
And yet it is an important component, as you pointed out.
238
00:13:44.000 --> 00:13:46.860
And one of the most important things is about the
239
00:13:46.899 --> 00:13:49.759
timing of it and how you do it. And also
240
00:13:49.799 --> 00:13:53.980
there's a lot of constant chatter about cutting it and
241
00:13:54.039 --> 00:13:56.919
what the impact would be. So we may have to
242
00:13:56.960 --> 00:13:58.139
take and carry this over to the other side of
243
00:13:58.159 --> 00:14:01.100
the break, but let's start on, so what's your sense
244
00:14:01.200 --> 00:14:06.110
about all the arguments about what happens if Social Security
245
00:14:06.230 --> 00:14:09.309
is cut. I think you've made a good point about it.
246
00:14:09.309 --> 00:14:12.450
It's not about going bankrupt. That's not really the right terminology.
247
00:14:13.129 --> 00:14:17.870
But what are the risks of the Social Security system
248
00:14:17.929 --> 00:14:20.269
now in terms of its solvency?
249
00:14:20.960 --> 00:14:22.980
Right. Well, and I want to just say first that
250
00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:27.600
I definitely would concur that there's nothing more important in
251
00:14:27.620 --> 00:14:30.019
the kind of the retirement landscape of the United States
252
00:14:30.059 --> 00:14:33.049
than Social Security and Medicare. Mm-hmm. You know, I write
253
00:14:33.110 --> 00:14:36.330
probably three quarters of my work in journalism is about
254
00:14:36.370 --> 00:14:40.850
those two things because there are two universal social insurance programs.
255
00:14:40.889 --> 00:14:45.169
They impact everybody. So I couldn't agree more that these
256
00:14:45.220 --> 00:14:49.139
are terribly important topics, Social Security and Medicare. So back
257
00:14:49.159 --> 00:14:52.799
to your question on Social Security. So, you know, Social
258
00:14:52.820 --> 00:14:56.580
Security is on track right now. You know, the finances
259
00:14:56.600 --> 00:14:58.940
of Social Security work this way. We talk about the
260
00:14:58.960 --> 00:15:02.740
Social Security Trust Fund or actually technically it's two trust funds.
261
00:15:02.820 --> 00:15:05.460
It's the disability and the retirement funds, but they often
262
00:15:05.500 --> 00:15:08.809
get lumped together and talked about as one, which is fine.
263
00:15:09.970 --> 00:15:12.389
And you could think about these trust funds as though
264
00:15:12.409 --> 00:15:16.889
they were a checking account. So the payroll taxes come
265
00:15:16.929 --> 00:15:19.909
into the checking account and then the checking account is
266
00:15:19.980 --> 00:15:22.840
used to pay out the benefits. That's really what a
267
00:15:22.860 --> 00:15:27.019
trust fund is. And while the money is sitting in there,
268
00:15:27.059 --> 00:15:31.500
it also gets invested in very conservative treasury notes. to
269
00:15:31.519 --> 00:15:34.960
earn some return. So the issue
that Social Security has
270
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:38.000
right now is that over the last several decades, Social Security,
271
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:42.679
the checking account's been running huge surpluses and it built
272
00:15:42.820 --> 00:15:48.720
up reserves of about $ 3 trillion. And those reserves are
273
00:15:48.779 --> 00:15:52.419
now being drained for two primary reasons. One is the
274
00:15:52.460 --> 00:15:58.519
accelerating pace of claims by retirees as the country ages.
275
00:15:59.470 --> 00:16:02.490
And the other is we've had a sharp decline in
276
00:16:02.909 --> 00:16:05.110
birth rates in the United States. So there are fewer
277
00:16:05.190 --> 00:16:07.509
workers coming into the system to pay into it than
278
00:16:07.529 --> 00:16:09.809
there used to be. So that mismatch is what we're
279
00:16:09.830 --> 00:16:12.830
dealing with. And what the trustees have been telling us
280
00:16:12.889 --> 00:16:15.450
is that we're on track for that checking account to
281
00:16:15.490 --> 00:16:19.870
be empty in 2035. And that forecast fluctuates a little
282
00:16:19.889 --> 00:16:22.230
bit from year to year, but not a lot. A
283
00:16:22.269 --> 00:16:23.409
year ago, it was 2034. Now it's 2035. It could
284
00:16:23.450 --> 00:16:30.429
drop back down. And so- If we reach the point
285
00:16:30.710 --> 00:16:34.049
where the checking account is empty, current revenue coming in
286
00:16:34.090 --> 00:16:37.009
from the payroll tax is enough to cover roughly 80%
287
00:16:37.009 --> 00:16:40.039
of the scheduled or promised benefits. So it implies a
288
00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:43.620
20% across the board cut in Social Security benefits, which
289
00:16:43.639 --> 00:16:47.720
would be catastrophic for current retirees and for future retirees.
290
00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:51.059
That's the most kind of primary issue that needs to
291
00:16:51.080 --> 00:16:54.129
be dealt with. And you can deal with it one
292
00:16:54.169 --> 00:16:57.509
of two ways. You can either raise taxes, you can
293
00:16:57.529 --> 00:17:00.090
cut benefits, or a third way is you can do
294
00:17:00.110 --> 00:17:01.750
some combination of the two. Right.
295
00:17:01.980 --> 00:17:05.519
Mark, let's just hold that thought. We're going to take
296
00:17:05.559 --> 00:17:09.200
a quick break, but don't go anywhere, folks. When we
297
00:17:09.240 --> 00:17:11.720
come back, we'll be talking much more with Mark Miller,
298
00:17:12.160 --> 00:17:15.849
the author of Retirement Reboot, Common Sense Financial Strategies for
299
00:17:15.890 --> 00:17:18.970
Getting Back on Track. So don't go anywhere. We'll be
300
00:17:19.029 --> 00:17:23.069
back very shortly. Welcome back, folks. We're talking with Mark Miller,
301
00:17:23.190 --> 00:17:26.910
a veteran journalist, author, and podcaster who's a nationally recognized
302
00:17:26.990 --> 00:17:30.950
expert in trends and retirement and aging. Now, before the break,
303
00:17:30.990 --> 00:17:34.430
we were talking about Social Security, and Mark was mentioning
304
00:17:35.450 --> 00:17:39.940
the conundrum we're in now about the trust fund theoretically
305
00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:42.859
being depleted by 2035 and a couple of different solutions
306
00:17:42.880 --> 00:17:45.119
to that. So let's just go back to that, Mark,
307
00:17:45.180 --> 00:17:48.359
and mentioning that we can raise taxes or Right.
308
00:17:48.740 --> 00:17:50.519
So if you look at where sort of the two
309
00:17:50.559 --> 00:17:54.349
political parties are on this, it's reasonably clear at this point.
310
00:17:54.769 --> 00:17:57.910
You know, there was a lot of coverage on this
311
00:17:57.950 --> 00:18:00.769
topic right after President Biden's State of the Union address
312
00:18:00.809 --> 00:18:04.130
in February, where, you know, he kind of laid down
313
00:18:04.190 --> 00:18:06.269
the gauntlet on this. And there was a lot of
314
00:18:06.309 --> 00:18:08.829
back and forth about cutting Social Security and Medicare between
315
00:18:08.849 --> 00:18:13.329
the political parties. Right. You know, the Democrats are pretty
316
00:18:13.410 --> 00:18:15.309
united on what they want to do. Basically, what they
317
00:18:15.329 --> 00:18:19.210
want to do is raise taxes on the wealthy and
318
00:18:19.289 --> 00:18:24.609
also expand benefits modestly. So it's a two-part punch there.
319
00:18:24.750 --> 00:18:27.089
One is you raise revenue to close that gap we
320
00:18:27.109 --> 00:18:31.460
were discussing, and then you raise enough to also expand benefits.
321
00:18:31.500 --> 00:18:36.720
The Republicans, you can't really generalize where they're at at
322
00:18:36.880 --> 00:18:40.839
this point. There's kind of the populist Trump wing basically says,
323
00:18:42.049 --> 00:18:44.450
don't touch Social Security, don't touch Medicare, but they're not
324
00:18:44.490 --> 00:18:47.369
proposing what they actually want to do to deal with
325
00:18:47.390 --> 00:18:50.390
the solvency problem. So it's not really a coherent position.
326
00:18:50.970 --> 00:18:56.529
The more Tea Party conservative wing, particularly in the House
327
00:18:56.569 --> 00:19:01.670
of Representatives, has a very well-articulated plan that they've been
328
00:19:02.430 --> 00:19:04.630
pushing for a number of years now. So it's no
329
00:19:04.710 --> 00:19:07.109
mystery as to what they want to do. They would
330
00:19:07.329 --> 00:19:11.089
cut benefits by raising the full retirement age further And
331
00:19:11.130 --> 00:19:14.230
that is a benefit cut that translates over time to
332
00:19:14.289 --> 00:19:17.539
about a 6% cut in benefits for every 12 months
333
00:19:17.579 --> 00:19:21.440
of delay or extension of the full retirement age. That
334
00:19:22.480 --> 00:19:24.319
may sound like a lot of jargon. We can unpack
335
00:19:24.359 --> 00:19:26.019
it if you want to, but it's a benefit cut.
336
00:19:26.700 --> 00:19:28.660
And then the other
thing that they want to do,
337
00:19:28.700 --> 00:19:32.059
which I think is significant, is they want to refocus
338
00:19:32.079 --> 00:19:34.400
Social Security so that it is mainly a program for
339
00:19:34.440 --> 00:19:37.660
low-income people. They're very upfront about this. They say that
340
00:19:37.799 --> 00:19:41.619
Social Security is not needed for middle income and affluent households,
341
00:19:41.660 --> 00:19:44.920
which I vehemently disagree with. I think that's just wrong, wrong, wrong.
342
00:19:45.420 --> 00:19:49.970
But it's a dangerous position also because it fundamentally moves
343
00:19:50.170 --> 00:19:52.839
social security away from what it is, which is an
344
00:19:52.930 --> 00:19:55.759
earned benefit program to one that is essentially kind of
345
00:19:55.799 --> 00:19:59.299
a means tested or welfare program. We don't award social
346
00:19:59.319 --> 00:20:02.019
security benefits based on need. We based it on what
347
00:20:02.039 --> 00:20:05.880
you've earned. So the benefit is determined by number one,
348
00:20:05.940 --> 00:20:08.740
having paid into the system with your payroll taxes and
349
00:20:09.160 --> 00:20:12.279
but actually your benefit amount is determined by your wage history.
350
00:20:12.759 --> 00:20:16.240
So Social Security takes your 35 highest years of wages
351
00:20:16.299 --> 00:20:20.440
and punches it through a formula that translates into a
352
00:20:20.480 --> 00:20:25.589
adjusted for wage inflation benefit amount that has nothing to
353
00:20:25.630 --> 00:20:28.829
do with your need for the benefit when you claim
354
00:20:28.849 --> 00:20:33.170
this is what you've earned. So those are the two approaches. Now,
355
00:20:34.789 --> 00:20:38.029
I used to think that Congress would come together and
356
00:20:38.349 --> 00:20:43.369
solve the problem, the exhaust, the trust fund problem, well
357
00:20:43.430 --> 00:20:47.500
ahead of 2035. But given the way politics have evolved
358
00:20:48.180 --> 00:20:50.240
in this country over the last five years, I'm not
359
00:20:50.279 --> 00:20:53.279
so sure anymore that they'll be able to come together
360
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:57.069
around a solution. So then the question becomes, what happens
361
00:20:57.130 --> 00:21:00.410
if we get right up against that deadline? Mm-hmm. The
362
00:21:00.470 --> 00:21:03.829
answer is, I think that you would have an emergency
363
00:21:03.869 --> 00:21:06.950
infusion of new revenue to avert the cuts. And that
364
00:21:06.970 --> 00:21:11.390
would happen either through taxes or some form of borrowing, perhaps,
365
00:21:12.710 --> 00:21:15.500
because the closer you get to 2035, you really can't
366
00:21:15.539 --> 00:21:19.119
solve the problem through cuts. Mathematically speaking, you can't get
367
00:21:19.180 --> 00:21:21.579
it done because it takes much more time for those
368
00:21:22.000 --> 00:21:25.200
changes to wash through the system. So, you know, it
369
00:21:25.740
--> 00:21:27.839
would be unfortunate to get to that because I think
370
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:30.710
the longer we wait, it just contributes to the public
371
00:21:30.890 --> 00:21:33.690
worry about the future of the program. You know, I
372
00:21:33.710 --> 00:21:36.430
think there's some evidence that it leads to some bad
373
00:21:36.470 --> 00:21:40.890
decisions on claiming strategies with people saying, oh, I better
374
00:21:40.930 --> 00:21:42.859
get my money while I can, that sort of thing,
375
00:21:43.900 --> 00:21:46.180
which is, we probably will get to this, but that's
376
00:21:46.279 --> 00:21:50.420
not an optimal strategy for optimizing your security benefits. Right.
377
00:21:51.529 --> 00:21:56.349
You know, unfortunately, that's the way it's evolving. You know,
378
00:21:56.369 --> 00:21:59.789
and I just am a strong proponent of the inject
379
00:21:59.829 --> 00:22:04.069
new revenue into the program approach. The standard line about
380
00:22:04.089 --> 00:22:07.039
this is, well, we can't afford, these programs are unaffordable.
381
00:22:08.319 --> 00:22:11.180
Where are we going to find the money to put
382
00:22:11.220 --> 00:22:15.880
into Social Security? This is, to me, nonsensical. It's not
383
00:22:15.920 --> 00:22:18.339
a question of money. It's a question of values. So
384
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:21.119
if I lay out the case that two-thirds of the country,
385
00:22:21.819 --> 00:22:26.099
has been left behind by the 401k system and needs
386
00:22:26.220 --> 00:22:30.299
more in the way of retirement income. We can certainly
387
00:22:30.359 --> 00:22:32.799
find the money to do that. We're a wealthy country.
388
00:22:32.859 --> 00:22:36.160
Social Security is like about 5% of gross domestic product.
389
00:22:36.220 --> 00:22:39.559
It's going to peak at 6% with the aging of
390
00:22:39.579 --> 00:22:41.980
the baby boom wave and then come back down to
391
00:22:42.019 --> 00:22:45.099
about 5%. And when we need to find money in
392
00:22:45.140 --> 00:22:47.400
this country to do things, we find it. When we
393
00:22:47.420 --> 00:22:51.140
need money for COVID emergency relief, I don't remember anybody asking,
394
00:22:51.160 --> 00:22:52.799
where are we going to find the money? We find it.
395
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:58.009
When we needed to make changes to security after 9-11,
396
00:22:58.029 --> 00:23:02.990
we find the money. It's only on topics like this
397
00:23:03.390 --> 00:23:06.109
where it's all about hand-wringing about where the money's going
398
00:23:06.130 --> 00:23:08.750
to come from. So we know where we can find
399
00:23:08.789 --> 00:23:10.519
the money. There's lots of places to go get it.
400
00:23:10.549 --> 00:23:13.980
I can get into them if you like, but that's
401
00:23:14.019 --> 00:23:17.079
what this is about. And so I actually think kind
402
00:23:17.099 --> 00:23:23.089
of a broad rethink of Social Security's role would be terrific.
403
00:23:23.180 --> 00:23:28.490
You know, the expansion programs, proposals that have been made,
404
00:23:29.910 --> 00:23:31.690
I just don't think go far enough. I mean, I
405
00:23:31.710 --> 00:23:34.190
really think that what we should do is have Social
406
00:23:34.230 --> 00:23:40.490
Security replace 60% or so of free retirement income, certainly
407
00:23:40.529 --> 00:23:43.269
for middle class and lower income households, maybe less so
408
00:23:43.309 --> 00:23:45.680
for on the affluent end. And, you know, we could
409
00:23:45.720 --> 00:23:47.819
find ways to do that if we decided we wanted
410
00:23:47.839 --> 00:23:52.390
to make Social Security the pension program with fewer and
411
00:23:52.410 --> 00:23:55.990
fewer people getting a traditional pension, which is a guaranteed
412
00:23:56.029 --> 00:23:59.329
lifetime payment. You know, this could be very beneficial. Instead,
413
00:23:59.369 --> 00:24:02.539
we're constantly fiddling around the edges here. Well, how do
414
00:24:02.559 --> 00:24:06.319
we create programs in the states to have like a
415
00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:10.099
public option auto IRA for low income workers, which is,
416
00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:13.339
you know, you know, a nice idea, but it's not
417
00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:17.609
a It's not a game changer. This Secure 2.0 legislation
418
00:24:17.630 --> 00:24:21.130
that was just recently passed into law, more marginal stuff,
419
00:24:21.170 --> 00:24:25.910
a lot of it benefits the wealthy. Extending required minimum
420
00:24:25.930 --> 00:24:30.130
distribution ages to 75 helps nobody except the most affluent.
421
00:24:31.150 --> 00:24:32.670
There are a few things in that bill that I
422
00:24:32.710 --> 00:24:37.380
think marginally are good for lower income people, but they
423
00:24:37.400 --> 00:24:40.480
take a long, long time to kind of wash through
424
00:24:40.519 --> 00:24:43.759
the system And they don't produce anything like the dramatic
425
00:24:43.940 --> 00:24:48.299
impact that you could have by reimagining Social Security to
426
00:24:48.339 --> 00:24:48.680
do more.
427
00:24:50.279 --> 00:24:54.400
Yeah, again, excellent points. I think that, you know, so I'm,
428
00:24:55.200 --> 00:24:59.009
you know, I'm still working, but I file for Social Security.
429
00:24:59.029 --> 00:25:03.089
So I'm getting Social Security as well. And it seems
430
00:25:03.150 --> 00:25:04.769
to me that I guess first, the thing that was
431
00:25:04.789 --> 00:25:08.990
hardened initially, you know, when people say, well, do you
432
00:25:09.019 --> 00:25:11.400
pay taxes on your Social Security? And the answer is yes.
433
00:25:12.029 --> 00:25:15.430
But on the other hand, that revenue goes back in
434
00:25:15.450 --> 00:25:17.509
the Social Security Trust Fund. So it doesn't go into
435
00:25:17.549 --> 00:25:19.470
general revenue. So I was like, okay, well, that's good.
436
00:25:19.490 --> 00:25:21.130
It goes back into the fund, number one.
437
00:25:21.799 -->
00:25:24.980
Number two, I think- And not everybody pays taxes on
438
00:25:25.000 --> 00:25:29.980
their benefit, it's worth mentioning. It really targets more people
439
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:31.480
with higher ordinary income.
440
00:25:32.140 --> 00:25:32.779
Right, right.
441
00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:36.259
Which in your case is because you're still working and
442
00:25:36.279 --> 00:25:38.059
so on. Yeah. Yeah.
443
00:25:39.720 --> 00:25:42.369
But going back to your initial thing about longevity, if
444
00:25:42.569 --> 00:25:46.210
we're living longer, if you create a base for people
445
00:25:46.309 --> 00:25:51.109
to be productive and secure and stable during those years,
446
00:25:51.910 --> 00:25:54.819
I think you'll get the return on investment is high
447
00:25:54.859 --> 00:25:57.400
on that in terms of not having them worry about
448
00:25:57.420 --> 00:26:01.980
not spending any money. If you provide a base of support,
449
00:26:02.500 --> 00:26:05.329
I think that'll come back in a societal way.
450
00:26:06.220 --> 00:26:08.500
In a societal way, yes, I think you're right. Not
451
00:26:08.559 --> 00:26:12.730
so much so for the trust fund. Taxes on benefits
452
00:26:12.789 --> 00:26:15.829
are a relatively trivial revenue source in the trust fund.
453
00:26:16.390 --> 00:26:19.450
So it doesn't solve the trust fund issues. But the
454
00:26:19.490 --> 00:26:22.670
question of working, there's lots of benefits to working longer,
455
00:26:22.809 --> 00:26:26.869
both societally and for the individual. I get into this
456
00:26:26.910 --> 00:26:29.789
in the book in some detail. I think it's a
457
00:26:29.829 --> 00:26:33.230
highly personal choice. It's not the right prescription for everybody.
458
00:26:33.250 --> 00:26:37.869
I think people who have worked in more physically demanding jobs.
459
00:26:37.890 --> 00:26:40.869
They're going to have trouble extending their working years into
460
00:26:40.930 --> 00:26:44.450
the late 60s and 70s, for example. And the other
461
00:26:44.470 --> 00:26:48.509
thing about this is that the older we get, time
462
00:26:48.529 --> 00:26:50.970
becomes that much more valuable to us. And so kind
463
00:26:50.990 --> 00:26:53.079
of being thoughtful about how you want to use your time,
464
00:26:54.079 --> 00:26:57.539
I think is important. So I don't say that working
465
00:26:57.579 --> 00:26:59.779
longer is a universal prescription, but one of the key
466
00:26:59.819 --> 00:27:04.369
chapters illustrates the critical importance of timing of retirement and
467
00:27:04.410 --> 00:27:07.369
how big of an impact, you know, when you retire
468
00:27:07.450 --> 00:27:11.630
can have on your security and retirement. So I'm illustrating
469
00:27:12.049 --> 00:27:15.269
that as an option, one of the main options for
470
00:27:15.490 --> 00:27:19.279
improving outcomes, if it's a path that's available to you.
471
00:27:19.319 --> 00:27:22.000
And then I've got another chapter that just looks at
472
00:27:23.079 --> 00:27:25.180
managing your career later in life. So I think it's
473
00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:27.680
an important topic, but it's just one of the many.
474
00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:30.539
You know, I basically have sort of six key things
475
00:27:31.089 --> 00:27:33.609
chapters in the book that outline what I call levers
476
00:27:33.650 --> 00:27:37.549
you can pull to improve outcomes. And they're not, none
477
00:27:37.589 --> 00:27:40.410
of them are, number one, they're not gimmicks. Number two,
478
00:27:40.470 --> 00:27:43.599
they're not necessarily easy to do, but they are achievable.
479
00:27:44.380 --> 00:27:46.759
And they're all worth, not all of them will be
480
00:27:46.819 --> 00:27:49.240
right for everybody, but they're all worth considering, I think,
481
00:27:49.259 --> 00:27:52.700
for people who find themselves approaching retirement without a lot
482
00:27:52.720 --> 00:27:53.299
of money saved.
483
00:27:53.740 --> 00:27:57.539
Yeah. So let's just finish up on social security, because
484
00:27:57.559 --> 00:28:00.640
you do mention that there are some decisions you can
485
00:28:00.680 --> 00:28:04.319
make irrespective of the global systems affecting Social Security, about
486
00:28:04.839 --> 00:28:11.119
when you file and how you file. This comes up
487
00:28:11.180 --> 00:28:12.980
a lot. Do you file sooner or later? What are
488
00:28:13.009 --> 00:28:15.549
the implications of when it is you decide to file?
489
00:28:16.369 --> 00:28:19.210
Right. Simply put, most people should be claiming later than
490
00:28:19.230 --> 00:28:25.170
they are. That's the headline. 80% of people have claimed
491
00:28:25.289 --> 00:28:29.299
by their full retirement age. And Just to be clear
492
00:28:29.359 --> 00:28:32.140
what we're talking about here, full retirement age is kind
493
00:28:32.160 --> 00:28:36.589
of a funny, jargony phrase. You might think it means
494
00:28:36.829 --> 00:28:38.930
the maximum amount you're going to get, but no, it
495
00:28:38.970 --> 00:28:43.150
means the age at which you're qualified to receive 100%
496
00:28:43.150 --> 00:28:46.750
of the benefit you've earned through your working years. Right now,
497
00:28:46.809 --> 00:28:50.880
it's about 66 years old and change. For anybody born
498
00:28:50.930 --> 00:28:52.559
after 1960 and later, it's 67, and that's because the
499
00:28:52.579 --> 00:28:59.410
age has been gradually pushed up as a result of
500
00:28:59.430 --> 00:29:02.410
the reforms that were enacted in 1983 to the program.
501
00:29:02.690 --> 00:29:05.400
It went from 65 to 67 over a long period
502
00:29:05.420 --> 00:29:09.440
of time. So you can claim as early as 62
503
00:29:09.440 --> 00:29:12.180
and you can wait as late as 70 to claim.
504
00:29:12.740 --> 00:29:15.220
And the earlier you claim, you're going to have an
505
00:29:15.359 --> 00:29:20.779
early claiming reduction if you file before your full retirement age.
506
00:29:20.819 -->
00:29:23.319
And if you claim after it, you get these delayed
507
00:29:23.380 --> 00:29:26.650
retirement credits. And the delayed credits are amount to about
508
00:29:26.710 --> 00:29:31.140
an 8% annual bump in your benefit amount. And the
509
00:29:31.200 --> 00:29:35.420
reductions are a little less on the order of 6.8%
510
00:29:35.420 --> 00:29:38.170
for every 12 months before your full retirement age. So
511
00:29:38.190 --> 00:29:42.890
like I said, say, 80% of us claim by our
512
00:29:42.910 --> 00:29:47.460
full retirement age. A very small percentage, maybe 15% claim
513
00:29:47.500 --> 00:29:50.500
at the latest age is that you would wait until
514
00:29:50.500 --> 00:29:55.880
70 to file. There has been some improvement in the
515
00:29:55.940 --> 00:29:58.819
percentages of people who are claiming at the earliest age.
516
00:29:58.859 --> 00:30:04.490
That's dropped from like 60% in the mid-1990s, I think,
517
00:30:04.910 --> 00:30:07.589
to about 30% now. So it's a dramatic decline. So
518
00:30:07.609 --> 00:30:09.329
people are at least getting the messages that they should
519
00:30:09.750 --> 00:30:15.029
delay somewhat. But for most people, delaying longer would be
520
00:30:15.069 --> 00:30:17.880
a good thing, especially for married couples. So that's the
521
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:23.279
basic message. The challenge here is, how do you fund
522
00:30:23.400 --> 00:30:26.240
that delay? And I mean fund from the standpoint of
523
00:30:26.740 --> 00:30:29.559
meet your living expenses. So some people can do it
524
00:30:29.599 --> 00:30:32.160
by drawing on savings while they wait, which can be
525
00:30:32.200 --> 00:30:35.299
a smart strategy. Some are going to do it by
526
00:30:35.660 --> 00:30:39.400
working longer. So there's always the question of how you
527
00:30:39.440 --> 00:30:44.220
fund a delay. The people who are wise probably to
528
00:30:44.240 --> 00:30:47.660
claim earlier are those who, for whatever reason, don't have
529
00:30:47.700 --> 00:30:53.099
an expectation of great longevity. And for married couples, it's
530
00:30:53.140 --> 00:30:55.569
good to have a coordinated strategy. It shouldn't be done
531
00:30:55.609 --> 00:31:00.809
in isolation. So the higher earner, higher earning spouse, if
532
00:31:00.849 --> 00:31:04.910
the higher earning spouse delays, uh, the longest that's, that's
533
00:31:04.990 --> 00:31:08.210
beneficial because that, that net person is bringing in the
534
00:31:08.230 --> 00:31:11.329
maximized monthly benefit to the household. Right.
535
00:31:11.910 --> 00:31:14.359
Now the other piece, um, that you've talked about a lot,
536
00:31:14.420 --> 00:31:19.079
of course, is Medicare. Uh, and we'll probably, uh, run
537
00:31:19.099 --> 00:31:22.329
through the break with this topic, but, uh, Again, let's
538
00:31:22.349 --> 00:31:24.930
just look at some of the general observations you have
539
00:31:24.990 --> 00:31:29.450
about Medicare. And then you got a good piece recently
540
00:31:29.470 --> 00:31:33.349
about some of the changes that are going to come into,
541
00:31:33.410 --> 00:31:37.480
have been coming in 2023. So first of all, you know, let's,
542
00:31:37.599 --> 00:31:41.660
if you've had some interesting observations about just comparing traditional
543
00:31:41.680 --> 00:31:45.180
Medicare and, you know, the Medicare Advantage.
544
00:31:47.000 --> 00:31:52.240
Well, Medicare has been massively privatized over the last couple
545
00:31:52.259 --> 00:31:54.799
of decades. People talk about it as government, quote unquote,
546
00:31:54.839 --> 00:32:00.970
government health care. And it is, and it's not. You
547
00:32:00.990 --> 00:32:03.690
can either be in traditional fee-for-service Medicare, or you can
548
00:32:03.730 --> 00:32:09.210
be in this managed care alternative called Medicare Advantage. And
549
00:32:09.230 --> 00:32:13.170
it's a critical choice that people need to pay a
550
00:32:13.170 --> 00:32:17.269
lot of attention to. at the point of initial enrollment
551
00:32:17.329 --> 00:32:20.529
in Medicare for reasons that I get into in the chapter.
552
00:32:20.869 --> 00:32:24.329
And I say in the chapter that, you know, I'm
553
00:32:24.369 --> 00:32:28.269
a believer in traditional Medicare wherever possible. You know, I
554
00:32:28.289 --> 00:32:30.809
think traditional Medicare to me is the gold standard of
555
00:32:30.829 --> 00:32:37.569
health insurance, United States. Traditional Medicare paired with a Medigap
556
00:32:37.589 --> 00:32:41.809
supplemental policy and a Part D drug plan. That's the
557
00:32:41.869 --> 00:32:44.130
most rock solid coverage you can get. Now you're going to,
558
00:32:44.569 --> 00:32:48.509
pay more in premiums on the front end because you'd
559
00:32:48.529 --> 00:32:52.309
be paying a Medigap and a Part D drug premium.
560
00:32:52.890 --> 00:32:55.869
But once you've done that, most of your, that's pretty
561
00:32:55.890 --> 00:32:59.579
much it. Nearly everything is going to be covered, uh, that,
562
00:32:59.700 --> 00:33:02.519
that Medicare is going to cover. Um, and you're going
563
00:33:02.539 --> 00:33:07.700
to have the greatest flexibility in your choice of healthcare providers, uh,
564
00:33:07.720 --> 00:33:10.440
where in your Medicare advantage, you're, you'd be subject to more,
565
00:33:10.640 --> 00:33:13.259
you know, the, the so-called narrow network approach of, uh,
566
00:33:14.750 --> 00:33:18.390
HMOs and PPOs. And so, you know, if some of
567
00:33:18.430 --> 00:33:20.970
this is financial and some of it is quality of life,
568
00:33:21.779 --> 00:33:24.319
you know, there's nothing more important than your health, particularly
569
00:33:24.339 --> 00:33:26.579
as we get older. And let's face it, you know,
570
00:33:26.640 --> 00:33:30.220
it's when we're older that we encounter more serious health issues. So,
571
00:33:30.259 --> 00:33:33.519
you know, I'm laying out the case here for people
572
00:33:33.559 --> 00:33:36.759
to give a hard think to being in traditional Medicare
573
00:33:36.779 --> 00:33:38.740
when they first sign up and sticking with it.
574
00:33:38.740 --> 00:33:42.759
Right. Okay, so we're going to talk about some of
575
00:33:42.779 --> 00:33:45.940
the changes that have come up in the last few
576
00:33:45.980 --> 00:33:50.269
months and look forward to this year. But before we
577
00:33:50.309 --> 00:33:52.990
do that, we're going to take another quick break. So, folks,
578
00:33:53.170 --> 00:33:55.190
we'll be back with much more in our last segment
579
00:33:55.210 --> 00:33:58.819
with Mark Miller, the author of Retirement Reboot, Common Sense
580
00:33:58.859 --> 00:34:02.200
Financial Strategies for Getting Back on Track. So don't go anywhere.
581
00:34:02.279 --> 00:34:05.750
We'll be right back. Welcome back, folks. We're talking with
582
00:34:05.809 --> 00:34:09.969
Mark Miller, veteran journalist, author, and podcaster, a nationally recognized
583
00:34:10.070 --> 00:34:13.719
expert on retirement and aging. Before the break, Mark was
584
00:34:13.780 --> 00:34:16.860
talking about Medicare, and I asked him, you know, what
585
00:34:16.900 --> 00:34:19.559
are some of the changes that we should expect this
586
00:34:19.639 --> 00:34:24.199
year for various reasons, you know, change in rules as
587
00:34:24.260 --> 00:34:27.170
well as legislation. So I'd just ask him to quickly
588
00:34:27.210 --> 00:34:27.809
touch on those.
589
00:34:28.670 --> 00:34:31.530
Sure. There's sort of a collection of things that take
590
00:34:31.570 --> 00:34:33.710
effect this year that, you know, I don't think any
591
00:34:33.789 --> 00:34:36.469
one of them are uh, game changers, but, you know,
592
00:34:36.510 --> 00:34:39.889
taken together are, I think, interesting. One is, uh, a
593
00:34:39.929 --> 00:34:44.880
streamlining of the, um, process for enrolling in Medicare when
594
00:34:44.920 --> 00:34:49.860
you enroll late. And people do, unfortunately, sometimes enroll later
595
00:34:49.880 --> 00:34:54.369
than they're, than they should. Um, And this first change
596
00:34:54.829 --> 00:34:59.599
streamlines the process for enrolling when you enroll late. It
597
00:34:59.679 --> 00:35:02.619
used to be that if you didn't enroll on time,
598
00:35:02.659 --> 00:35:05.460
you had to wait for a general enrollment period that
599
00:35:05.500 --> 00:35:08.719
ran from January through March. And that could expose you
600
00:35:08.760 --> 00:35:11.440
to a long wait, depending on the time of year
601
00:35:11.460 --> 00:35:15.840
that you enrolled. And so starting this year, whenever you enroll,
602
00:35:16.719 --> 00:35:20.090
you're going to be covered during the first month following enrollment.
603
00:35:20.670 --> 00:35:21.150
Enrollment.
604
00:35:21.210 --> 00:35:25.760
So it sort of streamlines that process. Another one that
605
00:35:25.980 --> 00:35:29.019
got a lot of headlines and is important is the
606
00:35:29.059 --> 00:35:32.340
cap on the cost of Medicare. Sorry, excuse me, is
607
00:35:32.360 --> 00:35:34.500
the cap on the cost of insulin for people enrolled
608
00:35:34.539 --> 00:35:38.429
in Medicare. Insulin costs have been a very big deal.
609
00:35:38.949 --> 00:35:41.309
And starting this year, the maximum you can be charged
610
00:35:41.690 --> 00:35:46.590
in Medicare Part D is $ 35 a month. Another change
611
00:35:46.630 --> 00:35:52.929
this year is that vaccine coverage is provided, adult vaccines
612
00:35:53.550 --> 00:35:56.449
are covered for free under Part D. This is gonna
613
00:35:56.489 --> 00:36:00.130
be important for some of the more expensive vaccines out there,
614
00:36:00.170 --> 00:36:03.469
such as the one for shingles. And then kind of
615
00:36:03.769 --> 00:36:08.219
more of a technical change that kicks in that involves
616
00:36:09.119 --> 00:36:12.340
rebates that pharmaceutical companies have to start paying back to
617
00:36:12.400 --> 00:36:16.199
Medicare if they boost prices at a rate that's higher
618
00:36:16.280 --> 00:36:20.260
than the general inflation rate. So it's an incentive to
619
00:36:20.380 --> 00:36:25.880
get drug companies to start moderating price hikes on drugs.
620
00:36:26.000 --> 00:36:27.960
So there's a number of things that were included in
621
00:36:28.019 --> 00:36:32.909
the Inflation Reduction Act passed last year that kick in
622
00:36:33.349 --> 00:36:35.829
over the next few years. But this last one I
623
00:36:35.849 --> 00:36:39.789
was just mentioning and the insulin provision became effective this year.
624
00:36:40.110 --> 00:36:43.679
Right. And on the talk about Medicare having the ability
625
00:36:43.699 --> 00:36:48.159
now to negotiate drug prices, those measures really kick in
626
00:36:48.199 --> 00:36:50.210
over the next few years, right? They're not immediate.
627
00:36:50.409 --> 00:36:54.210
Yeah, they're not immediate. They started in 2025, and even there,
628
00:36:54.250 --> 00:36:57.750
it's a limited list of drugs. So that's kind of
629
00:36:57.809 --> 00:36:59.730
a longer-term proposition.
630
00:37:00.130 --> 00:37:03.559
Right, right. So let's shift back now to our segment
631
00:37:03.739 --> 00:37:07.440
earlier about Social Security, about how we save for retirement
632
00:37:07.460 --> 00:37:11.269
in terms of our assets and income. So let's talk
633
00:37:11.289 --> 00:37:13.289
a little bit about other kinds of ways that you
634
00:37:13.329 --> 00:37:15.150
talk about how to build savings. And you've got a
635
00:37:15.750 --> 00:37:18.690
pretty good, streamlined approach to this.
636
00:37:19.909 --> 00:37:22.860
Well, I'm thinking here about a reader who hasn't saved
637
00:37:23.050 --> 00:37:25.559
earlier and might be getting close to retirement, maybe has
638
00:37:25.599 --> 00:37:28.579
the opportunity to do it now. Let's say kids are
639
00:37:28.599 --> 00:37:30.800
out of the house, college costs have been dealt
with.
640
00:37:31.239 --> 00:37:33.340
There can be a number of reasons. People tend to
641
00:37:33.380 --> 00:37:36.219
be in their higher earning years. It can be a
642
00:37:36.239 --> 00:37:38.380
number of reasons that it was possible to save. But
643
00:37:39.340 --> 00:37:42.119
I think one of the problems with retirement savings is
644
00:37:42.159 --> 00:37:46.940
an intimidation factor. It's not that many of us are
645
00:37:46.980 --> 00:37:51.260
investment experts. Not that many of us are, I think,
646
00:37:51.519 --> 00:37:55.000
interested in becoming investment experts. And so there is a
647
00:37:55.039 --> 00:37:59.699
fear factor of how to deal with this. So one
648
00:38:00.070 --> 00:38:02.929
bit of good news in the retirement landscape over the
649
00:38:02.949 --> 00:38:07.940
last couple of decades has been the advent of more simple,
650
00:38:08.239 --> 00:38:14.619
low-cost ways to invest in the market with great diversification
651
00:38:14.800 --> 00:38:22.409
and relatively lower risk. And that is using the approach
652
00:38:22.449 --> 00:38:26.449
of just using passive index funds, invest in a fund
653
00:38:26.489 --> 00:38:30.139
that just buys the entire stock market fundamentally. And so
654
00:38:30.199 --> 00:38:32.699
what I'm basically doing is laying out a simple approach here.
655
00:38:32.719 --> 00:38:35.590
It says, look, if you're able to save Do it
656
00:38:35.630 --> 00:38:40.550
in these low-cost, passive, total stock market vehicles. Pay careful
657
00:38:40.590 --> 00:38:44.559
attention to your costs because fees are the enemy here.
658
00:38:45.599 --> 00:38:49.099
It's very possible to invest in products that carry very
659
00:38:49.159 --> 00:38:55.500
low expenses these days. And when you compound costs out
660
00:38:55.579 --> 00:38:59.159
over a couple of decades, you start to see how
661
00:38:59.219 --> 00:39:01.559
big of a deal it is, how much of the
662
00:39:01.599 --> 00:39:05.869
money you keep in your pocket versus... what's staying in
663
00:39:05.889 --> 00:39:09.090
the pocket of the investment company. I think there's a
664
00:39:09.110 --> 00:39:11.130
tendency to think when you look at the fees on
665
00:39:11.170 --> 00:39:15.039
an investment product, let's say it says, we're only going
666
00:39:15.059 --> 00:39:18.360
to charge you 1% a year. It doesn't sound like much,
667
00:39:18.440 --> 00:39:20.659
but when you start doing the math and see that
668
00:39:20.699 --> 00:39:24.409
that's going to be charged to your account annually, year
669
00:39:24.469 --> 00:39:28.110
after year after year, and as your account grows, those
670
00:39:28.150 --> 00:39:31.670
fees get bigger, you start to see that it can
671
00:39:31.690 --> 00:39:35.150
really be determinative in terms of your ability to succeed
672
00:39:35.210 --> 00:39:39.000
building savings. So it's a very straightforward look. Kind of
673
00:39:39.019 --> 00:39:43.039
just do it this way, folks. This is the
way
674
00:39:43.179 --> 00:39:45.179
to do it if you're getting a late start. Keep
675
00:39:45.219 --> 00:39:48.360
it simple. By all means, keep it low cost.
676
00:39:49.340 --> 00:39:52.860
Right, right. And then on the other side of that,
677
00:39:52.920 --> 00:39:55.559
of course, is a lot of discussion about the withdrawal rate,
678
00:39:55.900 --> 00:40:00.179
you know, and some discussion, some differences about what changes
679
00:40:00.239 --> 00:40:02.440
in terms of how much, you know, makes sense in
680
00:40:02.460 --> 00:40:05.119
terms of withdrawal, you know, on a yearly basis.
681
00:40:07.119 --> 00:40:09.210
Yeah, there's a lot of research out there on that,
682
00:40:09.230 --> 00:40:11.829
you know, with the so-called safe withdrawal rate, what can
683
00:40:11.869 --> 00:40:15.610
you afford to withdraw in a way that, and safe
684
00:40:15.670 --> 00:40:20.550
means not exhausting your resources before you die and So
685
00:40:20.610 --> 00:40:25.219
it's really those calculations are done using mortality averages. So
686
00:40:25.260 --> 00:40:28.820
how meaningful are they? Yeah. I'm not sure. Current thinking
687
00:40:28.860 --> 00:40:32.139
seems to be, you know, somewhere a little bit below
688
00:40:32.139 --> 00:40:35.920
4% a year. So that gives you an idea of
689
00:40:35.980 --> 00:40:39.739
the kinds of, um, portfolios you need to build in
690
00:40:39.780 --> 00:40:42.309
order for retirement savings to be a meaningful part of
691
00:40:42.329 --> 00:40:44.730
your retirement income. Right. Right.
692
00:40:45.630 --> 00:40:50.030
Um, uh, I did want to get to, uh, I thought, uh, um,
693
00:40:50.650 --> 00:40:54.820
Your discussion with your kids was about retirement. What questions
694
00:40:54.840 --> 00:40:58.679
they had was really interesting and some of the questions
695
00:40:58.699 --> 00:41:01.039
they had. Maybe you could just mention some of the
696
00:41:01.079 --> 00:41:04.159
questions they had and how you responded to and what
697
00:41:04.199 --> 00:41:05.920
your reaction was to the questions.
698
00:41:07.139 --> 00:41:09.280
I mean, my big takeaway, this was for a podcast
699
00:41:09.360 --> 00:41:12.050
I did where I answered my kids and my nieces'
700
00:41:12.090 --> 00:41:15.989
questions about retirement. They really are paying attention. I think
701
00:41:16.030 --> 00:41:18.849
this idea that younger people aren't interested in this, I
702
00:41:19.030 --> 00:41:21.309
think they are. I think they have the general idea
703
00:41:21.349 --> 00:41:24.789
that maybe Social Security is not going to be what
704
00:41:24.829 --> 00:41:29.150
it has been for previous generations. And they'd be right
705
00:41:29.210 --> 00:41:32.630
about that because they're going to have a higher retirement
706
00:41:32.710 --> 00:41:37.440
age of at least 67, maybe higher, which means that
707
00:41:37.500 --> 00:41:39.300
they're going to take away less from the program. So
708
00:41:39.340 --> 00:41:43.380
they are thinking about saving. Questions had to do with
709
00:41:43.420 --> 00:41:47.559
things like where to prioritize retirement saving as compared with
710
00:41:47.599 --> 00:41:51.449
other things. And I basically say, It's not necessarily, unfortunately,
711
00:41:51.469 --> 00:41:53.449
the first thing you should be thinking about. I think
712
00:41:53.510 --> 00:41:59.849
if you're carrying high-cost student debt or high-cost credit card debt,
713
00:42:00.469 --> 00:42:03.880
and if you haven't built up some emergency savings, that
714
00:42:03.920 --> 00:42:08.119
ought to be done first. The rule of thumb is,
715
00:42:08.920 --> 00:42:11.119
especially for younger people, have three to six months of
716
00:42:11.480 --> 00:42:16.000
expenses socked away in a readily available liquid savings account.
717
00:42:17.559 --> 00:42:20.119
that's important because it can help you avoid going into
718
00:42:20.199 --> 00:42:23.829
debt when emergency needs come up and you want to
719
00:42:23.869 --> 00:42:25.190
stay out of debt. You don't want to be paying
720
00:42:25.230 --> 00:42:27.530
a lot of interest costs. So, you know, that was
721
00:42:27.949 --> 00:42:31.710
one area. I got a question about environmental, social and
722
00:42:31.750 --> 00:42:38.550
governance investing from my highly idealistic politically oriented niece. You know,
723
00:42:38.590 --> 00:42:41.030
so I think there's lots of things that, you know,
724
00:42:41.219 --> 00:42:44.000
are on their minds that I got questions about, you know,
725
00:42:44.019 --> 00:42:47.239
should they be worried about social security and, you know,
726
00:42:47.260 --> 00:42:49.039
that sort of thing. Right, right.
727
00:42:49.530 --> 00:42:51.909
Yeah, I think that I'm not, I think one of
728
00:42:51.929 --> 00:42:54.590
the articles maybe you referred me to was, but, you know,
729
00:42:54.610 --> 00:42:57.909
an interesting, you know, optimistic thing is that, yeah, they
730
00:42:57.949 --> 00:43:01.670
are thinking about retirement and that, in fact, millennials, from
731
00:43:01.710 --> 00:43:06.280
what I read, 7% of millennials contributed 7% or more
732
00:43:06.320 --> 00:43:11.699
to the 401ks last year, which is a lot more
733
00:43:11.739 --> 00:43:14.260
than we baby boomers did, which we saved an average
734
00:43:14.280 --> 00:43:17.460
of 3% or less, you know, for our 401ks. 401k
735
00:43:17.500 --> 00:43:19.349
so yeah the.
736
00:43:19.280 --> 00:43:21.920
Uh i mean i hope that survey is correct.
737
00:43:22.050 --> 00:43:26.829
Yeah yeah that'd be great yeah yeah yeah so um
738
00:43:27.730 --> 00:43:31.449
um so any additional thoughts before we leave uh you
739
00:43:31.469 --> 00:43:34.730
know you mentioned things about you know career choices and
740
00:43:34.929 --> 00:43:39.230
deciding when to retire as you know um uh part
741
00:43:39.269 --> 00:43:41.150
of the part of your equation.
742
00:43:42.170 --> 00:43:44.170
Well i'll just
mention one other thing which is another
743
00:43:44.190 --> 00:43:47.829
i think bit of good news on the retirement landscape
744
00:43:47.889 --> 00:43:50.409
in the last couple of decades is sort of, I'll
745
00:43:50.429 --> 00:43:55.190
call it the small D democratization of retirement advice or
746
00:43:55.210 --> 00:43:58.309
planning help. It used to be that this was just
747
00:43:58.349 --> 00:44:00.469
the province of the wealthy and it kind of went
748
00:44:00.489 --> 00:44:03.110
by wealth management was the acronym, the name for it.
749
00:44:03.650 --> 00:44:08.780
But we've seen the advent of much lower cost, good,
750
00:44:08.989 --> 00:44:12.780
solid advice solutions that are unbiased. I have a chapter
751
00:44:12.880 --> 00:44:14.320
on how to hire a planner, how to get advice.
752
00:44:16.679 --> 00:44:20.179
And I think, you know, even for the households we're
753
00:44:20.340 --> 00:44:24.300
talking about, which are not those that have big investment portfolios,
754
00:44:24.760 --> 00:44:27.099
you know, building a plan for retirement and getting a
755
00:44:27.119 --> 00:44:30.219
little professional help with it can definitely pay off. And
756
00:44:30.239 --> 00:44:34.119
it can be done these days, you know, relatively inexpensively.
757
00:44:34.179 --> 00:44:38.940
You can hire a fee-only registered investment advisor who's a
758
00:44:39.000 --> 00:44:44.360
fiduciary advisor, he said, underscore, bold face, fiduciary advisor. You
759
00:44:44.380 --> 00:44:47.289
want somebody who is acting as a fiduciary in all
760
00:44:47.369 --> 00:44:51.190
cases on your behalf. Hire such a person to do
761
00:44:51.210 --> 00:44:53.849
a one-time plan for you, give you sort of a
762
00:44:53.889 --> 00:44:57.829
checkup on where you're going. There are online services that
763
00:44:57.849 --> 00:45:00.869
can be helpful. So I think for those of us
764
00:45:00.909 --> 00:45:03.949
who are not necessarily expert in some of these areas,
765
00:45:04.010 --> 00:45:05.809
getting some help can really be a great thing.
766
00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:09.710
Yeah. One thing that I've covered a bit in the
767
00:45:09.750 --> 00:45:12.210
past is just that, how do people think about their
768
00:45:12.250 --> 00:45:14.360
housing as they get older? I think that a lot
769
00:45:14.389 --> 00:45:17.849
of people They want to age in place, but in
770
00:45:17.909 --> 00:45:20.730
some cases, you've got to transition somehow and you've got
771
00:45:20.750 --> 00:45:25.969
to think about your houses. It's a home, but it's
772
00:45:26.010 --> 00:45:30.380
an asset. How does that fit into your planning?
773
00:45:31.460 --> 00:45:34.039
I have a chapter in the book about home equity
774
00:45:34.460 --> 00:45:36.300
and how to think about it in a retirement plan,
775
00:45:36.320 --> 00:45:38.380
which I think you have to do when you're talking
776
00:45:38.420 --> 00:45:44.800
about a middle-income reader. where the home is probably the
777
00:45:44.820 --> 00:45:49.039
biggest source of saving, you know, with quote marks around it. Right.
778
00:45:50.280 --> 00:45:53.639
That they have, you know, most older Americans are homeowners
779
00:45:53.719 --> 00:45:55.670
and they have some equity built up in the home.
780
00:45:56.849 --> 00:45:59.250
But as you say, it's not the same. It's not
781
00:45:59.289 --> 00:46:01.210
a liquid asset in the way that, you know, a
782
00:46:01.250 --> 00:46:04.869
bank account is because it's wrapped up in a need
783
00:46:04.909 --> 00:46:09.460
for shelter and be lifestyle considerations. Where do you want
784
00:46:09.480 --> 00:46:13.090
to live, et cetera, et cetera. So I walk through
785
00:46:13.179 --> 00:46:17.500
in that chapter different options to consider everything from downsizing
786
00:46:17.519 --> 00:46:22.219
and moving to something less expensive. And I actually walk
787
00:46:22.239 --> 00:46:25.639
through some, for instance, examples on how big a deal
788
00:46:25.699 --> 00:46:31.519
that can be, sometimes involving a shift of location. But
789
00:46:31.840 --> 00:46:35.739
as you say, the surveys tell us ad nauseum over
790
00:46:35.780 --> 00:46:37.880
and over and over and over again, people want to
791
00:46:37.940 --> 00:46:41.639
age in place. And you know, I take that survey
792
00:46:41.699 --> 00:46:43.420
result with a grain of salt because I don't think
793
00:46:43.440 --> 00:46:48.690
people really have thought through what it means. I get it.
794
00:46:48.800 --> 00:46:50.320
I guess I would say I want to age in
795
00:46:50.360 --> 00:46:51.900
place too, but I don't know if it's the right
796
00:46:52.380 --> 00:46:55.440
move for me just yet. And I don't think we
797
00:46:55.460 --> 00:46:58.920
have as a country have thought through the implications of,
798
00:47:00.260 --> 00:47:02.159
you know, a country that we're all saying we want
799
00:47:02.179 --> 00:47:04.960
to stay right where we are when you know, first
800
00:47:05.079 --> 00:47:08.460
off communities aren't prepared to provide the kinds of services
801
00:47:08.500 --> 00:47:10.739
we're going to need if we're all living in, you know,
802
00:47:10.780 --> 00:47:15.599
suburban single family dwellings or, or multi dwelling walk-ups for
803
00:47:15.619 --> 00:47:19.219
that matter. Right. Um, you know, housing stock isn't really
804
00:47:19.260 --> 00:47:22.829
ready for it. You know, most, most houses are, you know,
805
00:47:22.849 --> 00:47:26.230
really equipped for people to age in place and get
806
00:47:26.269 --> 00:47:28.469
to a very advanced age as we haven't figured out
807
00:47:28.949 --> 00:47:33.329
how to provide the appropriate level of social and healthcare supports, um,
808
00:47:34.269 --> 00:47:38.230
Even basic things like transportation in the community. So, you know,
809
00:47:38.289 --> 00:47:40.210
I can frame that as a problem. I can also
810
00:47:40.269 --> 00:47:43.150
discuss it as an opportunity for
communities to get on
811
00:47:43.170 --> 00:47:45.809
the ball and start thinking about innovative solutions that can
812
00:47:45.849 --> 00:47:49.309
be opportunities to create businesses and jobs and all kinds
813
00:47:49.369 --> 00:47:52.590
of things. So I think it's a big unaddressed topic
814
00:47:52.650 --> 00:47:55.489
in most American communities. And then the final thing about
815
00:47:55.530 --> 00:47:58.199
home equity I'll say is that, so I have a
816
00:47:58.260 --> 00:48:01.019
section in the chapter about reverse mortgages, not because I
817
00:48:01.099 --> 00:48:04.530
love that solution, but, um, You know, I think they
818
00:48:04.610 --> 00:48:08.670
can be used safely. They've been regulation of reverse mortgages
819
00:48:08.730 --> 00:48:11.849
has been improved over the last decade or so. It's
820
00:48:11.869 --> 00:48:14.989
a very complicated product. Most people aren't that interested in
821
00:48:15.010 --> 00:48:18.440
it because it kind of feels like yet another form
822
00:48:18.480 --> 00:48:23.219
of debt that they're taking on, which it is. So
823
00:48:23.360 --> 00:48:25.539
it's not my number one choice, but I lay it
824
00:48:25.699 --> 00:48:28.940
out in some detail, you know, is that how they work,
825
00:48:29.840 --> 00:48:31.679
how they can be used, you know, how can they
826
00:48:31.699 --> 00:48:34.949
be used safely in retirement? Right. Great. I think home
827
00:48:34.989 --> 00:48:38.010
equity is, and just, you know, the whole question of
828
00:48:38.050 --> 00:48:39.789
housing is terribly important. Yeah.
829
00:48:40.690 --> 00:48:43.190
Well, we're going to save that for another show, Mark.
830
00:48:44.510 --> 00:48:46.809
But I just, so before we end, I just wanted
831
00:48:46.829 --> 00:48:49.940
to thank you for a lot of terrific information. And
832
00:48:49.980 --> 00:48:53.599
I wanted to, as we close to just let our
833
00:48:53.639 --> 00:48:58.440
guests know, our audience know where to reach you, where to,
834
00:48:58.500 --> 00:49:01.179
I mean, how to get in touch with you, where
835
00:49:01.199 --> 00:49:02.699
to find out about your stuff.
836
00:49:03.369 --> 00:49:05.570
Yeah, the easiest way is through my website. And the
837
00:49:05.610 --> 00:49:11.320
website is retirementrevised.com. And there you'll see a couple of things.
838
00:49:11.480 --> 00:49:14.820
One is an opportunity to sign up for the free
839
00:49:15.650 --> 00:49:18.409
email newsletter that I do. I generally publish it two
840
00:49:18.449 --> 00:49:21.820
or three times a month. sometimes with a podcast attached.
841
00:49:22.519 --> 00:49:25.079
And also at the site, you'll see a lot more
842
00:49:25.139 --> 00:49:28.760
detail and information about Retirement Reboot, the book. Yeah.
843
00:49:29.239 --> 00:49:32.380
It's a terrific site. You can listen to his podcast,
844
00:49:32.420 --> 00:49:35.039
read his articles, his blog, and so forth. And I've
845
00:49:35.079 --> 00:49:37.909
done it, so I recommend that you do it as well,
846
00:49:37.949 --> 00:49:40.170
and you can find out about his books on that
847
00:49:40.369 --> 00:49:43.530
site as well. So, folks, you can listen to Mark
848
00:49:43.769 --> 00:49:47.409
as a podcast at voiceamerica.com. You can also find it
849
00:49:47.949 --> 00:49:52.079
on my website, rowellresources.com. Just click on the 45 Forward tab.
850
00:49:53.519 --> 00:49:56.900
And so be sure to join me next Monday, 12
851
00:49:56.900 --> 00:50:00.099
noon Pacific, 3 p.m. Eastern time, when I'll be talking
852
00:50:00.159 --> 00:50:03.960
with Diane Jakobowicz of Fitness Empowerment. who is going to
853
00:50:03.980 --> 00:50:06.639
be doing the first of two shows about fitness and exercise,
854
00:50:07.179 --> 00:50:09.929
and does more broadly what she defines as movement for life.
855
00:50:10.670 --> 00:50:14.679
So with that, folks, keep moving forward. 45 forward.