النص 🔗
1
00:00:02,490 --> 00:00:06,450
Identifying vulnerability and ambiguity in the US.
2
00:00:06,450 --> 00:00:12,390
The Great, both the civilian and military world just loves models, mathematical models.
3
00:00:13,140 --> 00:00:16,020
But the problem is that they're not capturing the nuance.
4
00:00:16,620 --> 00:00:22,769
And because they're not capturing nuance, if you only have good data going in, then you're understanding what's happening.
5
00:00:22,770 --> 00:00:26,610
If you don't, if you have limited data or siloed data, then there's big problems.
6
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:33,480
So I've seen that as a huge problem and not only in the US, but they're particularly vulnerable to that with mathematical modelling.
7
00:00:33,990 --> 00:00:41,940
But elsewhere as well. We focusing on transitions, developing effective responses for different volatile environments,
8
00:00:42,450 --> 00:00:46,670
a non cookie cutter approach and avoiding unintended consequences.
9
00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:48,509
Let's see how this is going to play out.
10
00:00:48,510 --> 00:00:57,510
That vulnerability and ambiguity in crises civilian perceptions of personal security is an under-discussed issue.
11
00:00:58,170 --> 00:01:01,889
What do people in the country really think will keep them safe?
12
00:01:01,890 --> 00:01:07,200
And there's been a few attempts at understanding that, but mostly it's been an external view of security.
13
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:14,580
It's either been a military version of security, it's been a human rights aid organisations version of security.
14
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:21,030
But usually that often the people in country are not really asked use on a generosity of force.
15
00:01:21,570 --> 00:01:24,750
And they're it's about their exposure to formal and informal armed groups.
16
00:01:24,750 --> 00:01:30,150
And early on, long before Iraq and Afghanistan, I understood that communities could be,
17
00:01:30,540 --> 00:01:36,780
if you want to use the term occupied or are would be visited by formal forces during the day.
18
00:01:37,320 --> 00:01:45,389
It's could be security forces, could be army, it could be policing who would then leave at night and then be visited by informal forces,
19
00:01:45,390 --> 00:01:51,840
militias, rebels, terrorists, whoever at night and civilians would be caught in the middle.
20
00:01:52,290 --> 00:01:56,040
So I'd be asking, who did you see? What are they saying? But they're caught in the middle there.
21
00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:59,610
It's their lives at stake. They're the ones in true danger and they feel unprotected.
22
00:02:00,990 --> 00:02:05,090
Different roles of civilians, of complex crises. Well, as far as I'm concerned,
23
00:02:05,100 --> 00:02:12,870
you got some role play the Bible on that and killing civilians about depicting the many roles of civilians in these situations.
24
00:02:13,380 --> 00:02:19,110
I also found victim and perpetrator were often the same person
Load full transcript
it depending on timing
25
00:02:19,770 --> 00:02:26,549
a victim could a victim defined as individuals and communities often were targeted,
26
00:02:26,550 --> 00:02:28,709
had the most horrific incidents happened to them,
27
00:02:28,710 --> 00:02:35,310
but could later in the right circumstances and act exactly the same on the group that originally attacked them.
28
00:02:35,730 --> 00:02:41,670
So there a cycle of revenge that was being perpetuated complicit supporters in
29
00:02:41,670 --> 00:02:47,040
communities and areas who just would allow groups to come in and never say anything,
30
00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:50,190
would see things happening and never say a word.
31
00:02:50,730 --> 00:02:54,720
Then a truly tragic, innocent bystander overtaken by events.
32
00:02:54,990 --> 00:03:03,719
This is really the real sad, sad situation of of individuals and communities who have no interest in conflict.
33
00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:09,720
Trying to live their lives are in the wrong place and time and then community advocate not activists
34
00:03:09,990 --> 00:03:16,559
are are highly visible people individuals so on who understand that they can be targeted,
35
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:23,340
who have an understanding of the risks, the different roles of formal informal security forces and complex crises.
36
00:03:23,340 --> 00:03:30,209
Unfortunately, as we have seen, both state forces, formal forces and informal militias,
37
00:03:30,210 --> 00:03:34,350
rebel forces can both uphold law and order and protect civilians,
38
00:03:34,350 --> 00:03:41,069
and they can enact agendas and kill civilians depending on the situation either or in a conflict.
39
00:03:41,070 --> 00:03:46,560
And a real understanding of that by external civilian and military groups is essential.
40
00:03:48,630 --> 00:03:57,480
Refocusing on transitions is developing and communicating strategies for addressing major shifts within a country region caused by conditioned events.
41
00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:03,390
Time. Everyone was woefully unprepared for what happened in North Africa, really unprepared for Syria.
42
00:04:04,470 --> 00:04:10,800
If there's any way to anticipate and begin to understand that this the transitions that are the hard part
43
00:04:11,610 --> 00:04:17,430
stop stopping fighting or preventing fighting or securing an area is might very well be the easy part.
44
00:04:17,730 --> 00:04:21,540
But assisting an area in transition in a region transitioning is difficult.
45
00:04:22,170 --> 00:04:28,229
Refocus civilian military interventions on conflict transformation, prevention, mitigation, they said,
46
00:04:28,230 --> 00:04:37,470
protecting individuals and communities also in addressing the legitimacy of the judicial and political systems that exists in that country or region.
47
00:04:38,580 --> 00:04:42,750
Whether they're perceived to be legitimate or not is makes a huge difference.
48
00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:48,360
Host Nation Ownership and capacity. Is there an infrastructure, institutional infrastructure?
49
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:56,550
Is there not? That requires two very different approaches coordinated efforts to civil, military and regional engagement.
50
00:04:56,820 --> 00:05:02,100
I still hear people say a conflict, talk about a conflict.
51
00:05:02,210 --> 00:05:08,870
So it's local, though. It's isolated. I really don't think there's any such thing as a isolated conflict anymore.
52
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:15,740
And a local conflict can become global really quickly with the right motivation and technological tools.
53
00:05:16,100 --> 00:05:23,210
And it needs to be looked at that way if it stays local and stays local, because that's the decision of all parties to keep it that way.
54
00:05:25,100 --> 00:05:32,990
Developing effective responses. Re-examining ways to achieve high impact and low visibility cost effective operations.
55
00:05:33,350 --> 00:05:36,770
Cost effective is the key phrase now.
56
00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:41,959
Budget constraints for the ERA, certainly for the US, have trillions of dollars.
57
00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:46,040
This is absolutely gone and I see that certainly in Europe and other places as well.
58
00:05:46,700 --> 00:05:51,380
And there are many ways to achieve really good results without spending a lot of money.
59
00:05:52,070 --> 00:05:55,580
But it didn't seem no one seemed to be bothering with that because there was so much money.
60
00:05:56,270 --> 00:06:00,049
So it requires a rethink about how to do this effectively.
61
00:06:00,050 --> 00:06:07,820
And in small, small footprint, developing a better understanding of distinct responses and roles required by different global crises.
62
00:06:08,300 --> 00:06:15,500
A mali will require a different response than perhaps a crisis in a part of Latin America or the Asia-Pacific.
63
00:06:15,830 --> 00:06:20,690
It's not that they're so different, it's just the context may be slightly skewed.
64
00:06:20,690 --> 00:06:22,610
Maybe reform may reformatted,
65
00:06:22,610 --> 00:06:31,860
so certain action in one place may produce an unintended consequence and another incorporating constraints caused by local domestic geopolitics.
66
00:06:32,180 --> 00:06:39,440
I think of politics as a player in all of this, almost a person, almost an entity, but it needs to be figured in any equation.
67
00:06:39,470 --> 00:06:46,160
I don't think there's any way around it. Better understanding of the impact of international criminal syndicates and cartels.
68
00:06:46,730 --> 00:06:54,860
If you want to know how people, how terrorists, insurgents, rebels, arms their narcotics, money is flowing.
69
00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:57,440
Just watch the flows of human trafficking.
70
00:06:58,220 --> 00:07:06,020
Human trafficking is the number one most profitable resource in the criminal world, and on the back of that flows everything else.
71
00:07:06,020 --> 00:07:07,190
So those are mafias.
72
00:07:07,190 --> 00:07:17,210
When people are doing good research on that and you'll see how everything else is flowing globally, avoiding unintended consequences.
73
00:07:17,300 --> 00:07:22,450
This is so difficult when you see civilian organisations and military organisations.
74
00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:32,390
We're trying to help with help people have good intentions and then don't understand why their good intentions aren't rewarded with good outcomes.
75
00:07:33,470 --> 00:07:38,140
But there needs to be a better understanding of the advantages and pitfalls of waging war by proxy.
76
00:07:38,150 --> 00:07:43,850
This is part of the regional conflict dimension. We're seeing that with Iran in the US, for instance.
77
00:07:43,850 --> 00:07:49,160
Now in various areas in the Middle East, you're going to see it with China and the U.S. You'll see that with other countries in Europe
78
00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:54,800
and the superpowers in different parts of the world who are really it's really nothing new.
79
00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:57,500
The Cold War, that's really what was going on in the Cold War as well.
80
00:07:58,970 --> 00:08:03,770
Need more communication between civil military individuals and organisations in the virtual around.
81
00:08:03,770 --> 00:08:11,239
There are some attempts to do this, but there really needs to be more communication and the civilian military cross training on
82
00:08:11,240 --> 00:08:17,510
concepts of provocation and deterrence in volatile environments when it's affected by external,
83
00:08:17,870 --> 00:08:26,389
by virtual and external events. And just think of the Koran burning in one country and how many people are killed in another country because of it.
84
00:08:26,390 --> 00:08:34,880
And within the same day and you begin to picture the sort of the issues that are going on and why they need to be addressed.
85
00:08:37,980 --> 00:08:45,810
Looking ahead, developing international civilian military protocols for rapid and deeply thoughtful responses.
86
00:08:46,230 --> 00:08:49,980
This is aspirational, of course, to decision timelines affected.
87
00:08:50,310 --> 00:08:52,080
Salary by information technologies.
88
00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:58,740
There really needs to be and I think there's a lot of good people really beginning to think about this in various parts around the world.
89
00:08:59,430 --> 00:09:01,409
How can everyone communicate with each other?
90
00:09:01,410 --> 00:09:07,050
We have amazing technologies at our disposal now, but how we use them are using them to really communicate.
91
00:09:08,060 --> 00:09:15,930
And none of the I have found personally, and I think others as well have found that none of the issues have really changed the core issues.
92
00:09:16,560 --> 00:09:20,580
It's dealing with them in a more global way, a sort of a macro micro view,
93
00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:29,220
simultaneously increased international civilian military coordination and communication for effective response.
94
00:09:29,820 --> 00:09:35,250
And the US role is rapidly changing. As everyone knows. I think America is slowly coming to terms with this.
95
00:09:35,970 --> 00:09:45,810
Anyone, any Americans who work outside that country understand that America's power and affect and effective role influence has diminished greatly.
96
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:53,610
And so while they have great, great military capacity, their ability to influence has changed a great deal.
97
00:09:53,610 --> 00:10:00,980
And that's directly connected to Iraq and Afghanistan, which I recently heard on a major political show in the US.
98
00:10:00,990 --> 00:10:07,380
A foreign correspondent returned and said, Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan are considered catastrophes by the rest of the world.
99
00:10:07,750 --> 00:10:15,920
There's a sort of silence, but no argument. Seek ways to better support internal groups seeking peaceful mitigation of conflicts.
100
00:10:15,930 --> 00:10:19,230
Again, that goes back to individual perceptions of security.
101
00:10:20,160 --> 00:10:23,700
Often those are linked conflict mitigation.
102
00:10:23,700 --> 00:10:30,299
There are usually groups really trying to peacefully settle problems that are often overlooked and ignored.
103
00:10:30,300 --> 00:10:35,790
And then as violence began to take hold or are just sidelined until much later.
104
00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:51,770
And then finally, in Iraq in 2012, I had the privilege of going back to Erbil in Kurdistan and Baghdad with the U.S. Institute of Peace.
105
00:10:51,780 --> 00:11:00,570
I then working with them on writing their history in Iraq from 2003 to 2011, and it was a good time to go back as an American.
106
00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:04,680
The military was gone, the trillions of dollars were gone, and they were not coming back.
107
00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:08,610
It was the new beginning of a new world, so to speak.
108
00:11:09,510 --> 00:11:17,940
And I spoke to a number of Iraqis and this comment about we talked about civilian and military organisations in general,
109
00:11:17,940 --> 00:11:22,829
as well as USAID, his role and this comment stuck, stuck with me.
110
00:11:22,830 --> 00:11:27,840
And I think I want to leave you with this on the value of civilian organisations versus military.
111
00:11:28,380 --> 00:11:35,670
And this was said this was told to me by a senior politician of a minority background in Iraq.
112
00:11:36,510 --> 00:11:43,800
Civilian organisations, if they do things that arms and forces cannot do, prevent the conflict and save $1,000,000,000.
113
00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:47,970
Security is not peace and the target must be peace.
114
00:11:48,450 --> 00:11:55,250
Security is everywhere because there's no peace. So thank you very much.
115
00:11:55,610 --> 00:11:58,190
Moving on to other questions.